Talk:Oasis Management
Latest comment: 2 months ago by SandraMurphy33 in topic Excessive detail?
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Excessive detail?
editThe user below has a request that an edit be made to Oasis Management. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is moderate. Please be patient. There are currently 116 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hi, I am posting on behalf of Oasis Management. I am asking to reconsider the language of the 4th paragraph of the "Background" which appears to violate WP:UNDUE given the level of detail and overall weight compared to the rest of the article. I'd like to suggest that the content be summarized in a more encyclopedic manner as follows:
- In September 2011, the Securities and Futures Commission publicly reprimanded and fined Oasis and Fischer HK$7.5 million ($961,767) each for trades done in 2006 relating to Japan Airlines shares, which appeared to have been intentionally driven down to benefit Oasis. Oasis and Fischer did not admit wrongdoing but accepted SFC sanctions and took voluntary measures in 2007 to prevent similar events reoccurring.[1]
References
- ^ Hu, Bei (15 September 2011). "Hong Kong Regulator Fines Hedge Fund Oasis, CIO for JAL Trade". Bloomberg News. Retrieved 20 January 2024.
Would be grateful for the input of the wider community. SandraMurphy33 (talk) 10:25, 18 June 2024 (UTC)