Talk:North Carolina Commissioner of Agriculture

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Mid-importance).

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

This should be merged into North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services. This is because the agency/ministry has the primary article, and the head/commissioner/minister position should only get an article if there is enough sourced info about the position separately from the agency/ministry. WhisperToMe (talk) 21:14, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Firmly Oppose: I actually don't want to combine the two, because the head of this agency/ministry is an elected official in North Carolina, and holds office under the State Constitution. Additionally, other offices in the state (elected and unelected) have similar arrangements (see: North Carolina Superintendent of Public Instruction and North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, as well as North Carolina Commissioner of Labor -- although the Department of Labor doesn't have its own page). If this were an unelected office not mandated under NC Constitution Article III, section 7(a), I might agree. For instance, the Secretary of Cultural Resources perhaps shouldn't be a separate article from the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources. I understand your concern about lack of sourced material, and I will try what I can to improve the article, but regardless of content I think combining the two would be unnecessary. Cdtew (talk) 21:23, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oppose per Cdtew. The agency has an elected top official, hence WP:NOTABILITY would indicate that both need their own articles. I believe this pattern holds across most state articles, and if it doesn't, it should. Montanabw^(talk) 23:32, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oppose I agree with WhisperToMe that the department article is an ugly stub of an article. Would agree with Cdtew that they should be separate as, especially in NC since it is a statewide elected position, the office is of equal or even more import than the department as a whole. The department article just needs serious expansion work. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 20:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic