Talk:Neo-Aramaic languages
It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in the Middle East may be able to help! |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Title
editCall the languages modern Assyrian language and dialects....lets take a democratic vote. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.194.28.186 (talk • contribs) 18 May 2006
Zohar?
editI'm deleting the claim that the Zohar is an early neo-Aramaic text; as this article clearly states, neo-Aramaic refers to vernacular--that is, spoken--forms of Aramaic. The writer(s) of the Zohar knew Aramaic only as a literary language, and mostly through ancient Aramaic texts.Bws2002 (talk) 01:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Neo-Aramaic languages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029202639/http://www.premiumwanadoo.com/cuneiform.languages/syriac/index.php to http://www.premiumwanadoo.com/cuneiform.languages/syriac/index.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC)