Talk:Keel

Latest comment: 16 years ago by 79.182.121.221 in topic Untitled

Untitled

edit
  • added 'kelson' to the see also list

Kelson Philo 15:40, 22 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Sort of seems like if you say something like "keel was the first written English word" you ought to back that up with a citation? I find this factoid highly suspect and I believe that without further citation/research it should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.204.72.207 (talk) 04:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

A quick search lends some credibility to the claim (see http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/gildas_02_ruin_of_britain.htm) but doesn't verify it, so I'll tag "citation needed" and keep looking. scot (talk) 15:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Found a verification in a book on Google Books. scot (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think the short introduction text needs improving, "these parts overlap" isn't clear at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.182.121.221 (talk) 08:31, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply