Talk:Jesus Is Lord/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Ultimate Boss (talk · contribs) 23:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

For helping me getting "Cups" to GA. I am going to review this! I do have some homework to do so I'll finish the review by tomorrow. :) The Ultimate Boss (talk) 23:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The Ultimate Boss The bot has finally updated things but it has been a while since you opened this review and nothing has been done, any updates on this? --K. Peake 07:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

1. Well written:
   1. the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct;
   2. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
   1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
   2. all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
   3. it contains no original research; and
   4. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
   1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and

The Release and reception has grammar issues. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 15:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC) Are you sure the source lists it as Gospel? The Ultimate Boss (talk) 15:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

The Ultimate Boss Thank you for the review and yes, the bot did deliver the message but your ping came through too. As for the source, it mentions the song as one of the three gospel tracks on the album. About the grammar issues too; I have fixed what I can see and can you point out any remaining issues if they are present now? --K. Peake 16:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

1. 1. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
2. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
3. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
4. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
   1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
   2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
5. Overall
   1. 

user:Kyle Peake, I'm pinging you just in case the bot does not work. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 15:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

user:Kyle Peake, everything looks good! ✓ Pass The Ultimate Boss (talk) 16:54, 15 September 2020 (UTC)