Talk:House of Bogdan-Mușat

House of Bogdan, or House of Musat

I've got a problem. It seems that Bogdan I is not a member of the Musat house, which begins with Costea. So, maybe we simply need two articles instead of one. Dpotop 12:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

This is absurd. Ever wondered why the "-"? That's why. (The point is about all of them being members of the House of Bogdan,. not about some of them not being members of the Muşatin House). This article used to be placed at "House of Bogdan", which I guess was clearer, but then someone moved it. Really, why do you always come up with the most superficial "solutions"? Dahn 12:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Ok, then let's make clear what was the rule of succession in this family, to see why Costea Musat or his children were members of the House of Bogdan. The standard rule I knew is that the children of a woman belong to its husband's house. Dpotop 12:54, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

I think this would be about the 40th time I explain that the Moldavian princes had no clear system of succession (which is why the term "dynasty" is ridiculous in this context). All children, legitimate and illegitimate alike, had equal chances of inheriting (this is what os de domn refers to). Dahn 14:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Unsourced

The tree says Bogdan I had a grandson named Stefan (Stephen). This is unsourced and may be bulls. 2A00:23C7:5882:8201:E880:CF61:6180:F7B0 (talk) 13:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)