Talk:Ford Ranger

Automobiles High‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trucks Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Proposed merge of Ford Ranger EV into Ford Ranger

Latest comment: 1 year ago6 comments5 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was not to merge. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 18:30, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Just a EV version of the Ford Ranger Qwv (talk) 19:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

The FREV article seems like it has a lot of extra content but I don't see a big issue with keeping it stand alone. Springee (talk) 21:46, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Don't Merge Ford Ranger EV is in a similar context to Chevrolet S-10 EV and Toyota RAV4 EV; on top of that, merging it would clutter up the Ford Ranger (Americas) article too much. -SteveCof00 (talk) 10:09, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Oppose for reasons mentioned above. RickyCourtney (talk) 02:56, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. There's enough unique content in the EV article that I think it would overwhelm the main Ranger article. The vehicle itself is divergent enough from the standard Ranger that I think readers looking for information on either one would be better served by keeping the articles separate. --Sable232 (talk) 14:03, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic