Talk:F-Droid

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on F-Droid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203061021/http://www.thepowerbase.com/2012/08/f-droid-the-android-market-that-respects-your-rights/ to http://www.thepowerbase.com/2012/08/f-droid-the-android-market-that-respects-your-rights/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141210121308/https://gitorious.org/f-droid/fdroidclient/source/0b71cb7e7331fb73ee762225d0225fd92ce99010:src/org/fdroid/fdroid to http://gitorious.org/f-droid/fdroidclient/source/0b71cb7e7331fb73ee762225d0225fd92ce99010:src/org/fdroid/fdroid

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Criticism

The allegations in the Criticism section have been responded to by F-Droid and others, yet there is no mention of that. Also, that section references a single, non-independent source, which may or may not itself be reliable. The article has been tagged accordingly, feel free to improve. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.36.150.191 (talk) 13:15, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on F-Droid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150426020000/https://f-droid.org/posts/client-0-54-released/ to https://f-droid.org/posts/client-0-54-released/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://gitorious.org/f-droid/fdroidclient/source/0b71cb7e7331fb73ee762225d0225fd92ce99010%3Asrc/org/fdroid/fdroid

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

WP:PRIMARY, to tag or not to tag?

The following do not look WP:PRIMARY to me.

• Ref 6 from AndroidCentral by Jerry Hildenbrand
• Ref 7 from The Powerbase by "Tom Nardi: Tom is a Network Engineer with focus on GNU/Linux and open source software. He is a frequent submitter to "2600", and maintains a personal site of his projects and areas of research at: www.digifail.com ."
• Ref 14 from Free Software Foundation. It is an interview of F-Droid's founder, but it is published by an independent organization.
• Ref 17 published by Fosdem. It is a talk by an F-Droid developer, but it is published by an independent organization.
• Ref 18, 19, 20, 21 published by Replicant (Free Software Foundation), independent organization.
• Ref. 22 published by Guardian Project, independent organization.
• Ref. 23, 24 published by FSFE, independent organization
• Ref. 25, published by GNU, independent organization.

I could go on, but we evidently have different understandings of "primary" sources; I will untag. -- Yae4 (talk) 16:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

I'll let others participate; I'll just clarify that I meant "primary or self-published" in my edit summary, not just primary. DFlhb (talk) 18:54, 13 April 2023 (UTC)