Talk:Evangeline Adams

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Valetude in topic Discrepancy

Article structure

edit

The initial section is too long (as often in W.P.). It should only contain the first sentence. The following sentences, while containing useful information, should be placed under subsequent sections and headlines; a new sub-section "Works" or "Books" should be included. -- 147.142.186.54 (talk) 13:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

The reference to Crowley may be misplaced. Was it that Editor's Intro that alleged plagiarism? Did the same editor relate the story about the convinced jurist as well? Bn (talk) 14:38, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


Without credit of the original author, the article is leaving out a relevant detail. The original author of this stub left out Crowley's involvement as original writer of the General Principles of Astrology. This is newer information that the Adams estate recognizes and admits. Ref needed :) The original author of this stub included the story of the jurist.

I'll have to read up on how to add new sections and reword things to make it completely neutral.

Acowisatree (talk) 03:29, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Needs a general reworking

edit

This is a piss-poor article. It needs to be thrown out and rewritten from the ground up. Here are two references:

Forseeing the Future, by Karen Christino, published by One Reed Publications, Amherst, MA, in 2002

and,

What Evangeline Adams Knew, by Karen Christino, published by Stella Mira Books, Brooklyn Heights, NY, 2004.

Both books are copiously referenced. Dave of Maryland (talk) 21:19, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Discrepancy

edit

Lede says: February 8, 1868 at 8:30 am – November 10 or 12, 1932. Article says: Adams was born on 8 February 1859 Valetude (talk) 23:23, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Reply