| Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Euro article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 180 days  |
 | Euro is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Euro has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This  level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Negatives
editI see no mention of the arguments against the Euro, and little mention of the countries that have rejected it. Something that I think the article sorely needs for balance. 128.151.71.7 (talk) 15:20, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- So go ahead and find a consensus of critical appraisals, written from a WP:Neutral point of view by wp:reliable sources, please. Then propose a draft here. You may find some starting points at optimum currency area. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 17:35, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
"Pros and Cons of the Euro" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect Pros and Cons of the Euro has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 13 § Pros and Cons of the Euro until a consensus is reached. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 19:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:08, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Organizing the article
editAfter the recent changes by Dasomm, the article has two very similar sections: Countries that use Euro and Direct and indirect usage. This isn't good for the article, especially considering that the section titled Countries that use Euro talks also about countries that don't use the euro. Any suggestions to fixing this? Merging the two sections? Vgbyp (talk) 14:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- I edit the article once again, I think now it looks better. Dasomm (talk) 11:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, that's much better! Thank you! Vgbyp (talk) 09:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)