Wikipedia

Talk:Cracking of wireless networks

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Sakhumza in topic Cracking Wireless
Learn more about this page

Terms used — ‘hack’ vs. ‘crack’

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The use of the term “hacking” (and derivative terms, such as hacker) are misleading. Terms such as white-hat and black-hat should be used, or at least some kind of distinction between those with knowledge/experience who use it for evil-doing, and those who don’t. Perhaps the older term of “cracker” (and derivatives, such as cracking, and cracked) should be included where black-hat would not be grammatically appropriate. In short, a ‘hacker’ is not an evil-doer (even though they may know how to), and such concepts should not be implied by context of use. — See the usage notes & references for the entry in Wiktionary — Lee Carré (talk) 00:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


Request to change the title

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:23, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply


Wireless cracking → Cracking of wireless networks –

Dear fellow editors,

I have hereby requested to alter the title "Wireless cracking" into "Cracking of wireless networks".

I regard "Wireless cracking" as slipshod English, because the cracking itself is not wireless. (The cracking is performed by a human or by a computer; both of them are not wireless phenomena.) The title is also ambiguous, because it can mean the cracking of radio sets.

Firstly, I thought of "Cracking of wireless networks", which I derived from the current title.

Secondly, I considered "Cracking of WLANs" as an alternative to "Cracking of wireless networks". To obtain direction, I consulted the book Upgrading and Repairing PC's, 19th edition, by Scott Mueller. This most authoritive book on computer hardware has "Wireless networks" as a main entry in its index, while "WLAN" is not even present as a normal entry. Therefore, the use of the acronym WLAN should be rejected.

Thirdly, I considered "Intrusion of wireless networks" as an alternative to "Cracking of wireless networks". This alternative is based on the modern book Sams Teach Yourself TCP/IP in 24 Hours, 4th edition, by Joe Casad. This book favours the words intrusion and intruder. I think that "Intrusion of wireless networks" is more appealing in the perspective of someone who wants to secure a wireless network, but "Cracking of wireless networks" is more appropriate in the perspective of someone who wants to crack a wireless network, because cracking precedes intrusion, and it is the cracking that takes the effort.

I conclude that "Cracking of wireless networks" is the right title for our article.

Yours faithfully,

Maarten 1963 (talk) 17:28, 30 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.


Report of style

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  • The article uses British English.
  • The article is fully referenced. There is a reference at the end of each section and subsection, but not necessarily at the end of each sub-subsection, paragraph, sentence, or list item. However, when a switch is made to another source, there is always a reference at that point.
  • Remarks that comment the article itself or a named document are not referenced but they are verifiable by reading the article or by downloading the document and then reading it.
  • The article has internal links. They are not repetitive within a section, but can be repetitive within the article as a whole.
  • The article generally uses logical, chronological, or alphabetical ordering of list items.
  • When external documents themselves are accessible, their specifying information is in blue letters. When only more information about them is accessible, their specifying information is in black letters, followed by a blue external link icon.

Maarten 1963 (talk) 15:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

assesment

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

there are far too many external pdf links in this article. try to change them to source refs, and reference the sources properly. has great information, but it needs cleanup and proper style. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 19:54, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
ok, problem No. 1: the external links
No. 2: the refs. you don't need a ref for each section of a book if your citing a large portion of a book. it's making the reflist extra lengthy without need
-- Aunva6talk - contribs 20:04, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cracking of wireless networks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cracking of wireless networks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Cracking Wireless

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is it possible to hack wifi passwords not using application that are made to hack it? Sakhumza (talk) 15:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cracking_of_wireless_networks&oldid=1201213705"