Talk:Cool for the Summer

Sources

To use:

• https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/pop-shop/6612640/demi-lovato-cool-for-the-summer-single-july-1
• http://www.ew.com/article/2015/06/25/demi-lovato-cool-for-the-summer
• http://www.mtv.com/news/2196416/demi-lovato-cool-for-the-summer-single/
• http://www.ryanseacrest.com/2015/06/25/demi-lovato-announces-new-single-cool-for-the-summer-see-cover-art/
• http://www.musictimes.com/articles/41643/20150625/demi-lovato-cool-for-the-summer-new-single-release-date-sexy-artwork.htm
• http://www.idolator.com/7598236/demi-lovato-cool-for-the-summer-sexy-cover
• http://abcnewsradioonline.com/music-news/2015/6/25/demi-lovato-announces-new-single-is-cool-for-the-summer.html

Feel free to add more to this list. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:14, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

• http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/pop-shop/6296806/demi-lovato-new-album-2015
• http://www.ryanseacrest.com/2015/02/09/demi-lovato-teases-upcoming-fifth-album-this-will-be-my-best-work-yet/
• http://www.latina.com/entertainment/celebrity/demi-lovato-always-radiant-collection-new-music
• http://www.ryanseacrest.com/2015/06/08/demi-lovato-announces-new-music-coming-this-summer-at-digifest-nyc/
• http://www.mtv.com/news/2178475/exclusive-demi-lovato-album-inspriation/
• http://www.mtv.com/news/2197490/demi-lovato-summer-single-art/
• http://www.mtv.com/news/2197850/demi-lovato-cool-for-summer-teaser/

Official songwriting credits:

http://se.warnerchappell.com/song-details/WW010499884000

Coastside2 (talk) 17:46, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Spain

The position of 13 on the Spanish Singles Chart is incorrect. The reference refers to the digital chart which is different from the official chart which also includes streaming along with digital downloads. On the official chart, the song has yet to enter the Top 100.

No COI, so closed the COI edit request tag. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:43, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Also,  Not done Please provide reliable sources to support your changes. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:43, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 July 2015

Genre = Pop 73.131.35.133 (talk) 13:42, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 15:01, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

"emulates a new thematic"?

@Cabocla: The sentence

The track is a comeback to Lovato's pop rock roots, but also emulates a new thematic for the singer, with a more provocative theme.

is not reasonable English; it looks more like a dictionary translation.

• "Emulate" does not mean "display or demonstrate", but something more like "copy".
• "Return" would be better here than "comeback".
• "Thematic" is an adjective, only marginally related to a singer's style or subject matter.

I have changed it to

With this track Lovato returns to her pop rock roots while breaking new ground for herself with its provocative subject matter and treatment of it.

I'm not familiar with the song, but this seems to be what you're trying to say and is consistent with the rest of the paragraph. Maybe someone else who's a fan of Lovato's can check the whole article over. --Thnidu (talk) 21:14, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

@Thnidu: Well, sorry then (?). English is not my first language, and there are similar words to "emulate" and "thematic" in my native language, and they mean what I wanted to express in the sentence (those false cognates always get me). "Comeback" was just my mistake, actually (maybe I got confused because the track is Lovato's comeback single, I don't know).

Thanks for the change, it's better now and expresses exactly what I wanted.

Cabocla (talk) 15:44, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

@Cabocla: That's what I figured. I'm glad I captured the meaning you wanted. You're welcome! --Thnidu (talk) 16:12, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 August 2015

Adding MTV Song of the Summer nomination. Yololorenzo (talk) 23:23, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 08:48, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Commercial performance section

Why is there no "Commercial Performance" section which discusses the song's chart history and sales? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.107.136.44 (talk) 07:47, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cool for the Summer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160311114957/http://www.aria.com.au/pages/httpwww.aria.com.aupagesSingleAccreds2016.htm to http://www.aria.com.au/pages/httpwww.aria.com.aupagesSingleAccreds2016.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130604153636/http://www.riaa.com/newsitem.php?content_selector=riaa-news-gold-and-platinum&news_month_filter=5&news_year_filter=2013&id=C19496E7-CEC0-C453-D8A1-BD80E56E610F to http://www.riaa.com/newsitem.php?content_selector=riaa-news-gold-and-platinum&news_month_filter=5&news_year_filter=2013&id=C19496E7-CEC0-C453-D8A1-BD80E56E610F

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Cool for the Summer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ryanseacrest.com/2015/06/26/demi-lovato-teases-new-pop-rock-single-cool-for-the-summer-listen/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ryanseacrest.com/2015/09/09/demi-lovato-delivers-haunting-cover-of-hoziers-take-me-to-church-watch/
• Corrected formatting/usage for https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/cool-for-the-summer-single/id1013069897
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150929064150/http://www.billboard.com.br/tipo_lista/top-100/20150928/ to http://www.billboard.com.br/tipo_lista/top-100/20150928/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Rock version

Should the "rock version" of the song have its own section on the article? (This also counts for the pages of "Sorry Not Sorry", "Heart Attack", and "Confident") Since it did not receive much coverage and did not chart at all... It seems like just another remix that could easily be merged onto the Release or Remixes section. BePlus (talk) 22:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Charts (or lack thereof) aren't as relevant as how much attention it got from the media. For what it's worth, there are pieces from Rolling Stone, Alternative Press, American Songwriter, The Line of Best Fit, Billboard, and more specifically focusing on the rock re-recording. While it's accurate to describe this and the other rock renditions as remixes of past singles, I'm hesitant to get rid of their separate sections. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

I agree. However, it is just one of the explanations that I have. It did not chart, was not officially sent to radio, did not have much promotion (exepting one live performance), etc. I do not think it has sufficient relevance to have its own separate section on the article. It can be merged to other like in Dreamlover (song), for example. The thing that makes me doubt is the existence of Revamped. BePlus (talk) 22:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

I do see what you mean with the rock remix not being a separate single, but what does the Revamped compilation have to do with whether a separate section is warranted? SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

@SNUGGUMS, Because the "rock version" technically is a single from an album but I don't know... I was just looking for things that would lead me to understand why to oppose. BePlus (talk) 00:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)