Talk:Chlorine-36

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Untitled

edit

Information about production rates would be useful —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.198.136.144 (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I added a statement about recent claims of fluctuations and a reference to an arXiv paper. Of course this will soon change: either the fluctuations will be determined to be artifact, or determined to be genuine fluctuations in the decay rate. Either way this article will need editing again soon. Mike (talk) 18:25, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fluctuations have not held up, and are in conflict with more accurate measurements. T. M. Semkow, D. K. Haines, S. E. Beach, B. J. Kilpatrick, A. J. Khan, and K. O’Brien. Oscillations in radioactive exponential decay. Physics Letters B, 675:415–419, May 2009. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.04.051. P. S. Cooper. Searching for modifications to the exponential radioactive decay law with the Cassini spacecraft. ArXiv e-prints, September 2008 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4898:80E0:EE43:0:0:0:4 (talk) 15:07, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chlorine-36. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply