Talk:Butt Hole Road
![]() | A fact from Butt Hole Road appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 September 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability of Butt Hole Road
editGranted the street has got at least two mentions in sources that would be considered reliable sources, but in passing in one. I can't see that it passes WP:N in terms of "Significant coverage". FlowerpotmaN·(t) 19:06, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- I admit to being very puzzled by your comment. Geographical locations are really subject to quite different standards than some random person or some self-published book. Indeed, there are plenty of articles on Wikipedia about "towns" with less than a dozen people living there (see for example, Milltown,_South_Dakota). Here we are talking about a road that has gotten notoriety in the BBC and NY Times, was the inspiration for a book (which also selected it for an entry out of the laughingly large number of rude place names in Britain), and is a tourist attraction of sorts.
- Anyway, I removed the tag. The article is well-referenced, so I don't see what further work is required, other than to put in some geographical details and so forth. --C S (talk) 19:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- This page should have a facebook like button. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.33.124.146 (talk) 16:25, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
is there an unsound end?
editWhat is the "sound end" of a street? —Tamfang (talk) 21:06, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Uh, it's where the street begins from its southern point. All road articles use it. See {{Infobox road}}. –Dream out loud (talk) 04:24, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Pull the other one. —Tamfang (talk) 16:23, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- I don't understand. Are you trying to make a bad joke or something? –Dream out loud (talk) 17:38, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- That's my line. I saw the template, as you suggested; it does not contain 'sound'. So who's the joker? —Tamfang (talk) 21:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- I don't understand. Are you trying to make a bad joke or something? –Dream out loud (talk) 17:38, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Pull the other one. —Tamfang (talk) 16:23, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Why did they pay for the sign?
edit"Because the Doncaster Council would only replace a street sign for free if it was damaged or in a state of disrepair, the residents of Butt Hole Road had to raise £300 for a new street sign."
So why didn't the sign just have an "accident"? After all, people kept trying to nick it anyway. (Ref 13 that migtht explain it is gone.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.74.105.50 (talk) 22:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
the eponym is not transparent
edit- ... the street was renamed to "Archers Way", named after the 930-year-old Conisbrough Castle ...
Huh? —Tamfang (talk) 03:43, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- Probably the castle was protected by archers during times of siege. However, whatever the connection is, I agree that it does need to be clarified in the article. 108.246.205.134 (talk) 07:33, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Butt Hole Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090726201126/http://www.rac.co.uk:80/know-how/motoring-news/item/2009/05/28/residents-rename-butt-hole-road/ to http://www.rac.co.uk/know-how/motoring-news/item/2009/05/28/residents-rename-butt-hole-road/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 11 November 2016 (UTC)