Talk:Adam and Eve, Norwich
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Earliest known reference: 1241 or 1249?
editHi everyone. Sources differ as to the earliest reference to a pub on the site. The Good Pub Guide gives 1241 while the EDP suggests 1249. Can anyone find a conclusive source? Duffit talk 14:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Adam and Eve, Norwich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222003821/http://www.edp24.co.uk/norfolk-life/norfolk-history/1_adam_and_eve_1_213829 to http://www.edp24.co.uk/norfolk-life/norfolk-history/1_adam_and_eve_1_213829
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 4 October 2016 (UTC)