Talk:Biome

Leading space

Hey everyone, I am thinking the Holdridge life zone classification scheme diagram could use some updating, such as capitalization and maybe a slightly reworded outline. Cheers70.26.201.121 (talk) 04:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

ah! any leading space on the left margin converts to ugly-font (whatever the technical term is). What you want are multiple asterisk for different bullets. -- 66.153.24.xxx — Preceding undated comment added 15:21, 13 December 2001; Modified by Conversion script, 15:43, 25 February 2002

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711070312/http://www.galeschools.com/environment/biomes/overview.htm to http://www.galeschools.com/environment/biomes/overview.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Biome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161006125220/http://www.ecology150anniversary.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/tansley-1935.pdf to http://www.ecology150anniversary.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/tansley-1935.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081007024422/http://www.feow.org/mht.php to http://www.feow.org/mht.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110228054041/http://www.uwsp.edu/geo/faculty/ritter/geog101/textbook/biomes/outline.html to http://www.uwsp.edu/geo/faculty/ritter/geog101/textbook/biomes/outline.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:09, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

So is biome and ecosystem the same or not?

I am currently working on the article on ecosystems. I came to this article and find it doesn't explain clearly anywhere what the difference is between biome and ecosystem. E.g. there is this sentence here "The multiauthored series Ecosystems of the world, edited by David W. Goodall, provides a comprehensive coverage of the major "ecosystem types or biomes" on earth" - seems to imply that ecosystem and biome is the same? Is it? EMsmile (talk) 02:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

New Image for article

A high resolution PNG adapted from Terpsichores's SVG map of the world's biomes according to the WWF (found here - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Biomes_of_the_world.svg). I have gone through it and cleaned up the image where necessary to provide a high resolution, accurate, and worthy adaptation of the original map as made by Terpsichores.

Hello, a few days ago I found this article and thought the lead image to be a very interesting and informative graphic. I downloaded it to get a closer view but I found that when rendered as a raster image there was quite a lot of blurring and corruption. I took the time to clean up the image and make some minor changes (e.g. drawing more mangrove wetland areas where they are found in the world, and rendering a more accurate East Coast and Great Lakes regions of the USA).

I'm not sure how to convert the file to SVG format, I have tried to do so with Inkscape but it always comes out looking wrong. To my understanding the original SVG graphic made by Terpsichores has a superior level of detail at least as far as various fjord-lined coasts go, but when rendered as a PNG it has a noticeable decline in quality that I sought to rectify in my adaptation. If my retouching of the image is a more accessible and easily readable version of the map, I am tossing it out here for potential inclusion in this article. I won't make the change myself because I'm not sure whether it is a superior replacement of the one present in the article now, but I'll post it here to get hopefully a second opinion on the matter. Thank you. ADMelnick (talk) 23:45, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

All of the sections (conflicting with the more recent and widely accepted Olson et al. categorization) of the original map have been fixed. It wasn't an easy task, had to be edited pixel by pixel over a very long period of time (almost a year), but for the sake of keeping the simplistic and easy to read map for reader, it has been worth it. Berkserker (talk) 08:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2019 and 24 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kn 1997.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

colors do not match on map

The colors are different in the key vs the colored-in areas on the map. confirmed with gimp color picker tool. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.77.44.40 (talk) 09:57, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Colors not matching issue has also been fixed. Berkserker (talk) 08:49, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Vector version of the map

There is a vector version available, why isn't it being used?

File:Biomes_of_the_world.svg

VectorizeEverything (talk) 01:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Good call, I'll swap the current one with the vector version. Although lakes and oceans could use a different color to make it easier to distinguish from desert regions. It might get confusing for some, especially with places like East Africa, where several small desertic regions and lakes are rather difficult to tell apart. It is also worth mentioning that Global 200 uses a slightly different version of the same map, with certain temperate coniferous regions being classified as temperate grasslands. Might be worth including both versions in the article. Berkserker (talk) 10:41, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Is the lead image in this article following any particular biome/ecoregion classification?

I've been attempting to track down how the lead image was made, how regions like "tree savannah" are defined in the source material, and if any equirectangular examples following the format exist. Thus far, the only source for the image I've found is a paper atlas in Finnish. Is it following one particular set of standards (Koppen, Allee, etc.) or is it entirely freehand? If it does follow one particular standard, which is it, and can it be included in the caption instead of the vague "One way of mapping terrestrial (land) biomes around the world" the article currently uses? TheLazyBot (talk) 06:51, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Ecological Methods

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2022 and 16 November 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ShaniceTillery (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by ShaniceTillery (talk) 16:16, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Added excerpt from effects of climate change on biomes

I've just added an excerpt from effects of climate change on biomes as I know that article was recently updated so should have good content in the lead. My suggestion is to move what is currently in the section about climate change (if it's any good) to the lead of effects of climate change on biomes and then to bring it back with the excerpt tool. - The same could be done at ecosystem by the way if we decide to keep the article effects of climate change on ecosystems (which we might not). Pinging User:InformationToKnowledge in case they don't have this article on their watchlist. EMsmile (talk) 20:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)