User contributions for Belchfire

18 February 2013

• 06:0006:00, 18 February 2013 diff hist +996 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Belchfire reported by - MrX (Result: )
• 05:4205:42, 18 February 2013 diff hist −15 Chelyabinsk meteor →Object and entry: Switching to terms actually found in the source. If we're not using the convert tool, let's stick to a single system of measurement. Almost nobody understands Petajoules.
• 05:1005:10, 18 February 2013 diff hist +1,151 History of early Christianity →Women: (edited with ProveIt) Expand and reorganize, + cites
• 04:2704:27, 18 February 2013 diff hist +439 Talk:Chelyabinsk meteor →10000 tons is wrong
• 04:2604:26, 18 February 2013 diff hist −1,679 History of early Christianity Reverted good faith edits by Waffleboy15 (talk): Unsourced original research, and not salient to the topic of the article. (TW)
• 04:2304:23, 18 February 2013 diff hist +623 User talk:Belchfire →Edit warring redux
• 04:0304:03, 18 February 2013 diff hist −1,501 The Bible and homosexuality Undid revision 538790914 by MrX (talk) Rm off-topic content. Paul's credibility is not relevant here and sourcing doesn't change that. Perhaps this should be added to Paul of Tarsus.
• 03:5603:56, 18 February 2013 diff hist −855 Book of Leviticus Undid revision 538786776 by 2604:2D00:5:0:216:3EFF:FEF2:5BEC (talk) "Major point"? No. It's 2 verses. And it isn't close to being a "theme".

17 February 2013

• 22:1322:13, 17 February 2013 diff hist +14 The Bible and homosexuality →References to Sodom and Gomorrah in the Bible: This word is in the source and is necessary, as omitting it changes the meaning of the sentence.
• 18:2318:23, 17 February 2013 diff hist +61 The Bible and homosexuality →Other Epistles: The Greek words are useful to connect the quotes to the surrounding prose, but we can't simply omit partions of a direct quote and substitute foreign words in their place.
• 06:1006:10, 17 February 2013 diff hist +1,767 Talk:The Bible and homosexuality →Versions of the bible
• 05:5205:52, 17 February 2013 diff hist −16 Chelyabinsk meteor Undid revision 538668295 by Electron9 (talk) Rv good faith edit. Convert template w/multiple units is standard throughout Wikipedia.
• 05:4505:45, 17 February 2013 diff hist 0 m The Bible and homosexuality →Other Epistles: Copyedit (minor)
• 05:3905:39, 17 February 2013 diff hist +394 User talk:MrX →February 2013
• 05:3205:32, 17 February 2013 diff hist +354 Talk:The Bible and homosexuality →Versions of the bible
• 05:2405:24, 17 February 2013 diff hist +797 User talk:MrX General note: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on The Bible and homosexuality. (TW)
• 05:2205:22, 17 February 2013 diff hist −885 The Bible and homosexuality Undid revision 538669890 by MrX (talk) Fails verification, reverted per WP:V. What version is this from? Figure that out and provide links before reverting.
• 05:2005:20, 17 February 2013 diff hist +157 The Bible and homosexuality →Leviticus 18 and 20: (edited with ProveIt) Ch to NIV, in conformity with the rest of the article. Added cites for verses, slightly better formatting for readability.
• 05:1405:14, 17 February 2013 diff hist −1,327 The Bible and homosexuality →Romans 1: Added version info, rm irrelevant aside arguing against the validity of Pauline doctrine based on off-topic non-sequitur concerning other matters. (edited with ProveIt)
• 05:0605:06, 17 February 2013 diff hist +442 The Bible and homosexuality →Other Epistles: Add version designation, remove overlinking. Also, Pauline authorship of 1 Timothy is disputed. (edited with ProveIt)
• 04:4504:45, 17 February 2013 diff hist +577 Talk:The Bible and homosexuality →Versions of the bible: Yes, identify the translation in use and stick with just one translation throughout the article.
• 04:2704:27, 17 February 2013 diff hist −1,258 The Bible and homosexuality →Does the Bible condemn homosexuality?: Non-encyclopedic section removed per Talk discussion.
• 00:5900:59, 17 February 2013 diff hist +8 The Bible and homosexuality →David and Jonathan and Ruth and Naomi: See John Boswell and David M. Halperin. "Liberal" doesn't really work, but there is no pretense of neutrality or objectivity with these two.
• 00:0500:05, 17 February 2013 diff hist +426 Talk:Chelyabinsk meteor →Energy Released Clarification

16 February 2013

• 23:4323:43, 16 February 2013 diff hist +269 Chelyabinsk meteor →Object and entry: Update mass info, with source, plus added convert template for kiloton equivalent (edited with ProveIt)
• 23:1223:12, 16 February 2013 diff hist +386 Abraham We have a pretty solid tertiary source on the debate (edited with ProveIt)
• 22:5522:55, 16 February 2013 diff hist +281 Talk:Book of Leviticus →Off-topic POV cruft is removed from the lead
• 22:5222:52, 16 February 2013 diff hist +782 User talk:Belchfire →Edit summaries
• 15:5315:53, 16 February 2013 diff hist +913 User talk:Belchfire →Edit summaries
• 15:2815:28, 16 February 2013 diff hist +387 User talk:Belchfire →Edit summaries
• 14:5714:57, 16 February 2013 diff hist −824 Book of Leviticus Undid revision 538561817 by 2.133.93.162 (talk) rv edit warrior
• 06:3806:38, 16 February 2013 diff hist −2 George W. Bush Reverted good faith edits by Myownworst (talk): Restoring consensus version. "Somewhat" is a WP:WEASEL with a somewhat less than precise definition. (TW)
• 05:2105:21, 16 February 2013 diff hist −7 Chelyabinsk →2013 meteor event: Sources disagree wildly on the mass. NASA says 7000 tons. All we really know is that nobody actually knows.

15 February 2013

• 07:1207:12, 15 February 2013 diff hist +154 The Bible and homosexuality →Matthew 8; Luke 7: Good source, let's make full use of it
• 07:0707:07, 15 February 2013 diff hist +8 The Bible and homosexuality →David and Jonathan and Ruth and Naomi: Fraternal love doesn't require brotherhood. "Platonic" is absolutely the wrong word. Feel free to propose an alternative if this doesn't work for you.
• 01:5801:58, 15 February 2013 diff hist −6 American Family Association Undid revision 538287942 by JeffJonez (talk) Restoring consensus wording. There's nothing non-neutral about "values".
• 00:5400:54, 15 February 2013 diff hist −1,434 User talk:Belchfire Undid revision 538261138 by Binksternet (talk) No, that's not what this is about.

14 February 2013

• 15:1615:16, 14 February 2013 diff hist +7 The Bible and homosexuality →Does the Bible condemn homosexuality?: Restoring tag removed during revert. This section needs help.
• 15:0315:03, 14 February 2013 diff hist +7 The Bible and homosexuality →Does the Bible condemn homosexuality?: Entire section appears to be OR, but can be tagged for the time being
• 14:5814:58, 14 February 2013 diff hist +1,034 User talk:216.81.94.78 →February 2013: new section
• 14:5314:53, 14 February 2013 diff hist −1,530 The Bible and homosexuality →Romans 1: rm ad hominem reasoning unrelated to section topic
• 14:5014:50, 14 February 2013 diff hist −22 The Bible and homosexuality →David and Jonathan and Ruth and Naomi: c/e
• 14:4714:47, 14 February 2013 diff hist −955 The Bible and homosexuality Undid revision 538231027 by 216.81.94.78 (talk) Rv disruptive edit by Wiki-hound.
• 07:3907:39, 14 February 2013 diff hist −582 The Bible and homosexuality →Matthew 8; Luke 7: No source for this, and no credible support in the parent articles
• 07:2907:29, 14 February 2013 diff hist −19 The Bible and homosexuality →References to Sodom and Gomorrah in the Bible: "On the other hand" doesn't work here, as Ezekial doesn't set up any contrast to speak of.
• 07:2607:26, 14 February 2013 diff hist −337 The Bible and homosexuality →References to Sodom and Gomorrah in the Bible: rm unsourced original research
• 07:2307:23, 14 February 2013 diff hist −17 The Bible and homosexuality →Leviticus 18 and 20: rm puffery

13 February 2013

• 05:1105:11, 13 February 2013 diff hist +495 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection Requesting full protection of Book of Leviticus. (TW)

12 February 2013

• 03:0503:05, 12 February 2013 diff hist +543 User talk:Belchfire →Ascription of ideas: avoiding the phrase "according to..."
• 02:5102:51, 12 February 2013 diff hist +498 User talk:PiCo →Leviticus: new section