Content deleted Content added
TonyBallioni (talk | contribs) ←Created page with '==GA Review== {{Good article tools}} {{subst:GAN/subst|{{subst:PAGENAME}}}} '''Reviewer:''' [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]] (User...' |
→GA Review: Thank you so much! |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 6:
I'll try to get at this one this week. It is an in-depth article on a vital topic, so it might take some time, but I'll do my best. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 00:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
'''[[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|GA]] review – see [[WP:WIAGA]] for criteria'''
#Is it '''well written'''?
#:A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: {{GAList/check|+}}
#:: <s>{{tq|she presided over her sisterhood, the Athenai}} is a bit unclear. I'm not sure what her sisterhood is.</s>
#::::I have revised the phrase in question to better explain what the ''Athenai'' sisterhood was. --[[User:Katolophyromai|Katolophyromai]] ([[User talk:Katolophyromai|talk]]) 20:07, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
#:: <s>{{tq|and thus perhaps the Lady of Athens.}} perhaps seems out of place and speculative. If it is a possible translation, there is probably a better way of phrasing it.</s>
#::::I have reworded this passage. "The Mistress of Athens" is a probable translation of "Athana Potnia." It is not speculative; it is used in most works on the subject. In fact, in more recent works, "the Mistress of Athens" seems to be the more common translation; "Athena of Athens" still occurs, but is generally more prevalent in older writings. --[[User:Katolophyromai|Katolophyromai]] ([[User talk:Katolophyromai|talk]]) 18:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
#:: <s>{{tq|In this aspect, Athena was also known as Parthenos, which means "virgin", because she was believed to have never married or taken a lover}} How does this connect to the previous sentence about war? The phrasing seems to link the virginity to it.</s>
#::::Athena Parthenos was envisioned as a warrior maiden; this aspect of her emphasized her status as a virgin and also her status as a warrior. I have amended the passage to try to make this more self-evident. --[[User:Katolophyromai|Katolophyromai]] ([[User talk:Katolophyromai|talk]]) 19:06, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
#::
#:B. It complies with the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|manual of style]] guidelines for [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section|lead sections]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout|layout]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch|words to watch]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists|list incorporation]]: {{GAList/check|+}}
#::
#Is it '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]''' with '''no original research'''?
#:A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with [[WP:FNNR|the layout style guideline]]: {{GAList/check|+}}
#::
#:B. All [[WP:Inline citation|in-line citations]] are from [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or [[Wikipedia:Likely to be challenged|likely to be challenged]], and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the [[Wikipedia:Scientific citation guidelines|scientific citation guidelines]]: {{GAList/check|+}}
#::
#:C. It contains [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research]]: {{GAList/check|+}}
#::
#:D. It contains no [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright violations]] nor [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]]: {{GAList/check|+}}
#:: Nothing coming up in Earwig.
#Is it '''broad in its coverage'''?
#:A. It addresses the [[Wikipedia:Out of scope|main aspects]] of the topic: {{GAList/check|+}}
#::
#:B. It stays [[Wikipedia:Article size|focused on the topic]] without going into unnecessary detail (see [[Wikipedia:Summary style|summary style]]): {{GAList/check|+}}
#::
#Is it '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral]]'''?
#:It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: {{GAList/check|+}}
#::
#Is it '''stable'''?
#: It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]] or content dispute: {{GAList/check|+}}
#:: No edit wars
#Is it illustrated, if possible, by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]'''?
#:A. Images are [[Wikipedia:Copyright tags|tagged]] with their [[Wikipedia:Copyright FAQ|copyright status]], and [[Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline|valid fair use rationales]] are provided for [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|non-free content]]: {{GAList/check|+}}
#:: All good
#:B. Images are [[WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE|relevant]] to the topic, and have [[Wikipedia:Captions|suitable captions]]: {{GAList/check|+}}
#:: Looks fine
#'''Overall''':
#:Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|+}}
#::Looks good overall. The only issues I found were those with clarity early in the article, and you've corrected them. I'm passing this now. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 03:44, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for agreeing to review this article. I really appreciate it. If you happen to notice any problems at all, I am more than willing to address them. --[[User:Katolophyromai|Katolophyromai]] ([[User talk:Katolophyromai|talk]]) 03:54, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|TonyBallioni}} Thank you so much! This is the third article I have nominated for GA that has been reviewed and the first one that has passed. I really appreciate you taking the time to review this article. I do still have five articles in the "Philosophy and religion" category that are still currently awaiting review. These are: [[Inanna]], [[Enlil]], [[Anunnaki]], [[Jonah]], and [[Pythagoras]]. I also have several other articles I am currently working on trying to bring to GA. In the meantime, I will continue reviewing your article [[Papal conclave, 1655]]. --[[User:Katolophyromai|Katolophyromai]] ([[User talk:Katolophyromai|talk]]) 04:13, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
| |||