User talk:Tinux

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Tinux. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Tinux~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:10, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:KonzessionH9R11.pdf

Copyright status: File:KonzessionH9R11.pdf

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:KonzessionH9R11.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: Thanks, I changed the license to Public Domain. How will the warning be removed, do I have to do this? Didn't find out... Tinux (talk) 18:43, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

This is scan of historical document. It may be in public domain, but non because you scanned it. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:44, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation. I found the correct tag meanwhile. Tinux (talk) 07:51, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:KonzessionH9R11.pdf

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:KonzessionH9R11.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 19:53, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, I changed source and author to the name of the Swiss authority which published the document. Hope that's OK. --Tinux (talk) 07:54, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Grab Paulette Goddard Remarque.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Grab Paulette Goddard Remarque.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Afeef (talk) 06:42, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sichten sichten Bild 1 von Leo Bettina Roost.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sichten sichten Bild 1 von Leo Bettina Roost.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Hallo @Martin Sg.. Das Bild wurde durch die Fensterfront gemacht und nicht von innerhalb, darum sollte die Panoramafreiheit gültig sein. Es handelt sich um ein öffentlich zugängliches Gebäude (Schulhaus). Wäre da auch ein Bild von innen gestattet? Ich habe nämlich noch ein anderes Objekt, das nur von innen sichtbar ist. Danke und liebe Grüsse, Tinux (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2023 (UTC)