User talk:Satdeep Gill/Archives

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Satdeep gill!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

File:Le Pianiste.jpg

File:Le Pianiste.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

—Tom Morris (talk) 13:39, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the best thing to do is ask on French Wikipedia about local copyright policies. On English Wikipedia, we allow images to be used under the US legal doctrine of "fair use". Commons doesn't contain material that contain non-free images. Try asking a French Wikipedia administrator. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanx for your help. --Satdeep gill (talk) 14:14, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Waris Shah.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Waris Shah.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Waris Shah.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:René Wellek.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:René Wellek.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 22:47, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Teja Singh Sutantar.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Teja Singh Sutantar.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 19:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Teja Singh Sutantar.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Teja Singh Sutantar.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Teja Singh Sutantar.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ju Ta 18:23, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bharat Prakash 2.jpg

File:Bharat Prakash 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

⧼Wikibase-terms/Archives⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear Satdeep Gill,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Manmohan.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Manmohan.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Manmohan.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Balbir Aatish.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Balbir Aatish.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 07:09, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:New Moti Bagh Palace, Patiala.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:New Moti Bagh Palace, Patiala.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:26, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Using your camera right...

At first, you have a good camera and - I presume - quiet good lenses. Enough to make really good pictures!

Use always the RAW versions, not JPGs out of the camera. There is a really big difference!
When focussing, take the spot meter. Otherwise the camera doesn´t know, which is the subject.
Use a tripod as often you can. I always work with a tripod, even a monopod is better. When using the full length of your lens (300mm), you won´t be steady enough to keep the camera stabil.
Learn how to process your pictures. Use a software like Lightroom (if you can afford), but also Raw Therapee (free) or Darktable (also free) can do a good work. Gimp is good for clearing some perspective problems. Every good photographer use some of this tools. But the best is to use Capture One Express (for Sony) which is free for download! (but just a trial-version)
Don´t use some Creative Programs of your camera, Use the AV-Mode. (I don´t know, what term Sony use) You are the photographer, not the camera!! Try to control everything - the camera itself will do it wrong! Don´t belive Sony in any case, whatever they say, its for idiots and not more than jakediyak blah blah.
The most important thing for a good picture is sharpness. Sharpness. Sharpness. Try to start with this.
Do some experiments with the same motif.
Get up early in the morning, the sky is clear, the light is much better. Avoid to make pictures with hazy environment until you know, how to handle it. Make pictures with a really clear blue sky. If you don´t have a blue sky, make close up images of houses or other objects. Or people - but only if they want it!
Read the fucking Manual! Skip everything, were you find the word automatic.
If you mean, that something might be a good subject, just take some time to understand it. Don´t rape the motif (I mean it)! Be respectful. Sometimes I spent hours, even days to understand it. Especially architectural motifs. Take a walk, go farther, than closer. Get into the idea. And then, make your pictures. And make plenty of them and decide later, which represents the idea which makes this building interesting for you. Plenty pictures means eventually sometimes hundreds! From the same subject!
If you work manually, use ISO 100 or 200, 200/sec, f/8. If possible. And always try to have the sun in the back. I this is not possible in the morning, try it on late afternoon.

Bullock cart in Punjab: This is typical for wrongdoing. Why do you use 200 mm instead of 70? If you want to have sharp pictures, do it as close as you can! In this case, the camera doesn´t know what the subject is. There are a lot of different measure methods, use one: The spot-method. The people and the bull is the focus point. Everything else is not important - just for filling the nothing. And use a tripod. 150/sec will be enough in this case.

Gurdwara: Where is the focus? Where are the contrasts? What kind of composition is that? Check out, if the aperture f/5 is too large for this lens, try f/8 (not smaller!). There is no reason at all to use f/5. Use a tripod. And - do you wanted to make a picture of the sky?

New Moti Bagh Palace: This image is much better, much sharper, but what happens right and left? There is always a massive perspective distortion with 18mm, you have to handle during postprocessing. In this case you must go back to get more space on both sides - because you will lose it, when you make the perspective correction. The best zoom is always zooming by foot!

Have fun! I spent two month in India, also parts of Punjab in 1976. It´s a country with some of the greatest motifs we have on earth! Greetings from Austria --Hubertl 08:01, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{ping|Hubertl]] Thanks a lot for this much information. I am sure I will be able to click a Quality image some day. I will start clicking only RAW images from now onwards. Teaching by using my images is really helpful. I will try not to make these mistakes again. Thanks again. I will reach out to you with better images to learn more.--Satdeep Gill (talk) 08:26, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I´m sure, the QI process is the best education for new photograper! Be patient! --Hubertl 14:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ кыргызча ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Satdeep Gill, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:11, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Help desk#File format changes automatically while moving Audio Files

Hi Satdeep,

I want to let you know that I moved your question to Commons:Help desk#File format changes automatically while moving Audio Files. That is the appropriate place for such question. Thank you. Wikicology (talk) 06:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Sanjhe Sah Laindian.pdf

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sanjhe Sah Laindian.pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:100wikidays meetup at Wikimania 2016.jpg

File:100wikidays meetup at Wikimania 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

iopensa (talk) 09:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baptistry (Pisa).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bottom of the photo might have been sharper, but quality is high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:40, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Seagull in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pretty good quality. The species could possibly be identified more accurately. --Peulle 08:21, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ratna Pathak at DIFF 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The crop at the bottom is somewhat too tight, but good quality otherwise. --A.Savin 16:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asif Basra at DIFF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 19:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Karamjit Grewal.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Karamjit Grewal.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Karamjit Grewal.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:09, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old door at Deepgarh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rokhsareh Ghaemmaghami.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 19:37, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Felix Nartey at Wikimania 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak Support Good quality but disturbing background. Please review other images. And you may add the personality rights template. --XRay 07:19, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mardetanha at Wikimania 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality but disturbing background. Please review other images. And you may add the personality rights template. --XRay 07:19, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rohit Dua at Wikimania 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality but disturbing background. Please review other images. And you may add the personality rights template. --XRay 07:19, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Punjabi Ear Cleaner - Portrait.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Please review other images. And you may add the personality rights template. --XRay 07:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farahnaz Ispahani at Times Litfest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Nikhilb239 15:52, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farahnaz Ispahani in 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Nikhilb239 15:52, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Liuto Chittara Player.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Farahnaz Ispahani.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Camera settings

Hi, If I may help you, you should not use automatic settings of your camera. For example, in File:Toadstool at Khanna, Punjab.jpg, you have Exposure time = 1/1,600 sec, F-number = f/4.5, and ISO speed rating = 1,000. You should reduce ISO to 100 and F-number to 9 whenever possible. Here you don't need such a high speed as 1/1,600 sec. 1/125 sec should be sufficient. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: Although I am experimenting with the manual mode, I do understand now that ISO should have been reduced in this case and also the shutter speed should have been less. And F-number to 9 increases the depth of field and focuses on the whole subject right ? I will keep this in mind from now onwards. Thanks a lot.--Satdeep Gill (talk) 03:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I usually don't use the full manual mode, but either the "aperture priority" or "speed priority" mode and I set ISO on 100/200, and I let the camera choose the corresponding speed or aperture. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:08, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farhan Akhtar - Times Litfest 2016, New Delhi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please correct the CAs and also the image needs sharpening. --Nikhilb239 00:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Nikhilb239: --Satdeep Gill 16:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC) Looks OK to me. --Nikhilb239 09:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Asif Basra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woman covering her face with her child on her back.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 12:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated kingfisher near village Zulamgarh, Ludhiana district, Punjab.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:White-thorated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 02.jpg

File:White-thorated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A.Savin 04:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:White-thorated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 04.jpg

File:White-thorated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A.Savin 04:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Back of White-thorated Kingfisher.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 08:03, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

White-throated Kingfisher - White balance

Hallo Satdeep Gill, I have corrected the white balance of all your pictures and I hope you will agree with the result. In addition I have withdrawn my "oppose". Greetings --Llez (talk) 23:23, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Llez: I really appreciate this a lot. Thank you. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 02:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to the review page?

Hi, Satdeep. I want to let you know that somehow, the review page for the VIC in the scope Halcyon smyrnensis (White-throated Kingfisher) was deleted. You should ping or contact User:Charlesjsharp and User:Archaeodontosaurus and let them know you corrected the white balance of that photo, but there's no way for anyone to vote or comment if the review page is deleted, so if there's any way you can restore it, do that.

Best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Or rather, seeing the post above, User:Llez corrected the white balance. But the rest of my remarks stand. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do not rename an image during the contest. The link is broken. But you can always access it manually. Thanks to User:Llez for his work. A good example of cooperation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Archaeodontosaurus: Thanks for informing me about that. And yes, this is indeed a great show of cooperation in the community.--Satdeep Gill (talk) 14:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 10:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated kingfisher in Ludhiana disctrict, Punjab, India 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I think taxa names should be included in the file description --Moroder 08:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated kingfisher in Ludhiana disctrict, Punjab, India 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK, IMHO. --C messier 12:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me. --C messier 12:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

File:White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 04.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated kingfisher in Ludhiana disctrict, Punjab, India 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp image, good contrast, effective use of depth of field to isolate subject. --Ryanx7 07:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:West Bengal Wikimedians User Group logo - variation 3.svg

File:West Bengal Wikimedians User Group logo - variation 3.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Bodhisattwa (talk) 07:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Native Garhwali Woman In Rishikesh, Uttrakhand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:15, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanterns in Rishikesh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Native Garhwali Woman In Rishikesh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Proper categories please. --A.Savin 20:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[OK] Done --Satdeep Gill 01:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC) Good quality --A.Savin 14:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Masked wagtail near Rishikesh 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Borderline to me, but I think the bird is OK although I'd like to see clearer black head and neck feathers. -- Ikan Kekek 12:59, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Masked wagtail near Rishikesh 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Again borderline to me. -- Ikan Kekek 13:00, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bags In Rishikesh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This looks nice and I like it. Perhaps someone could be bothered by the DOF but the first bag is entirely sharp. But: a part of the bag is overexposed, please try to correct it. The image is tilted. And please try to assign more precise categories. --Basotxerri 18:38, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[OK] Done --Satdeep Gill 01:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Sorry, the image is still tilted clockwise. It seems that you've lowered the overall exposure. As I see the EXIF info of Lightroom, could you try to lower the highlights and tone up the shadows a bit? --Basotxerri 16:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Basotxerri: can you please check now ? If there is still some problem then I would request your help in doing so. --Satdeep Gill 11:42, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK for me. --Basotxerri 20:45, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langoor In Rishikesh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Mardetanha and NahidSultan at Wikimania 2016.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Jcb (talk) 08:18, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These files were accidentally added to the DR, I will remove them. Jcb (talk) 08:26, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Love it MarkHilton (talk) 21:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Velvet Mites 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Velvet Mites 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:41, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Velvet Mites 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 05:30, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oriental Garden Lizard in Patiala.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Photographers User Group Meeting 2018

According to your lecture in Montreal we have planned a meeting. Are you interested in that? --Ralf Roleček 21:23, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ralf Roleček, thanks a lot for inviting me to this. I have added my interest on the page and also mentioned a presentation that I would like to give during the conference. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 04:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Korean Statue at Port Vancouver (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 22:37, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Song Sparrow in Calgary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CommentIMO nearly good quality. You should remove the CAs. --XRay 05:24, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done fixed --Satdeep Gill 05:33, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are still CAs. I've added a note. --XRay 06:07, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done I have added a newer version. Please check it if it has been fixed now.--Satdeep Gill 18:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support It's better, but there are still CAs. You are using Adobe LR. It's an easy task to remove the CAs. --XRay 15:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Korean Statue at Port Vancouver.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Looks like it's slightly out of focus, but it is sharp enough. --C messier 09:55, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Namrata Shirodkar (cropped).png

File:Namrata Shirodkar (cropped).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Эlcobbola _talk 17:16, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikisource Urdu logo

Can you develop Urdu Wikisource logo like Punjabi Wikisource logo?----Bukhari ^Talk 14:44, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stray German Shepherd Dog.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:56, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaswant Zafar at Bhai Vir Singh Sahitya Sadan - 17 Feb 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:02, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaswant Zafar at Bhai Vir Singh Sahitya Sadan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:11, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sumail Singh Sidhu at Bhai Vir Singh Sahitya Sadan - 17 Feb 2018 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape near Auroville, Pondicherry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Sky could be improved. And please improve the categorization. All the waste around the path ... :-( --XRay 07:06, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Satdeep Gill 12:40, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. Thank you. --XRay 12:52, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sand crab (Ocypode brevicornis) at University Beach, Pondicherry 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Adorable! and good quality --Trougnouf 16:55, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A view from University Beach, Pondicherry 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and very atmospheric, with a nice rhyme between the clouds and the surf. -- Ikan Kekek 02:53, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pichavaram Mangrove Forest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:21, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A view from University Beach, Pondicherry 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:21, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A view from University Beach, Pondicherry 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment This is sunrise or sunset? Please add categories. --Halavar 11:08, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done It's a sunrise and I have added a category. --Satdeep Gill 11:58, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I helped uoy a little bit with that category:) QI for me --Halavar 13:36, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A photographer at University Beach, Pondicherry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:58, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A view from University Beach, Pondicherry 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:58, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Tamil Boy in Bommayapalayam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chrysocoris stollii at Patiala, Punjab.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality IMO --PJDespa 12:02, 01 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chrysocoris stollii near Patiala, Punjab, India 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me --Cvmontuy 17:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inside Pichavaram Mangrove Forest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:27, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spirit house in Bangkok.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Though the crop is a bit tight at top the quality is fine. However the image should be categorized at least in one of the districts of Bangkok, as well as it should be written in the description field too. If possible the addition of a geolocation with {{Location dec}} would be perfect too. --Christian Ferrer 08:08, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done I have added info and cat regarding the district. I don't have GPS in my camera so I am unable to do that.
Support Good quality. Me too I don't have GPS, I try to localise the places of my photos with Google map and then I copy and paste the coordinates. But anyway thanks you, the descriptions and categories are important. Try to get in the habit of always describing and categorizing to the most precise, it helps the visitors. --Christian Ferrer 20:22, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viruncamban Statue at Suvarnabhumi Airport, Bangkok.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Background has a lot of noise. But for me the photo has sufficient quality.--Famberhorst 15:41, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basket weaver in Bangkok.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:21, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street vendor cart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:13, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Comrade Sukhinder Singh Dhaliwal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:49, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A view of Ao Nang beach, Krabi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grape vine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruins near village Arnauli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality IMO --PJDespa 08:20, 11 April 2018 (utc)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Punjab March 2018 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but you should crop one side to put it off center. --Yann 14:09, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Punjabi turbaned man - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The image is OK but could you add the personality rights template to the file description? --Basotxerri 18:18, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done Satdeep Gill 07:56, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:00, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Punjabi Man from Gulabewala, Sri Muktsar Sahib.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:25, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Darshan Singh, Village Akbarpur Afghana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:25, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Punjabi turbaned man - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rooftops in Phra Nakhon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pleasing interplay of forms and good detail --Daniel Case 19:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Darshan Singh, Village Akbarpur Afghana.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Darshan Singh, Village Akbarpur Afghana.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Darshan Singh from village Akbarpur Afghana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Children of village Gulabewala, Sri Muktsar Sahib.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The children's faces are all in focus and the colors are nice (Although I think you could crop in on both sides and square the iamge up ... the background isn't doing much there) --Daniel Case 16:58, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memorial to the victims of Communism, Prague 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Well done!! The Photographer Thu, 26 Apr 2018 23:45:53 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memorial to the victims of Communism, Prague 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 20:55, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memorial to the victims of Communism, Prague 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 21:57, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! John 14-6 at Blutenberg Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:26, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inside Cango Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:54, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:View from Table Mountain, Cape Town 07.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 16:02, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A nomad putting on his kurta-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:48, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A nomad putting on his kurta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A view from Pinnacle Point, Mossel Bay, South Africa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:52, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Copyright workshop, Delhi, India, 2018

Hi, Thanks for the pictures! Yann (talk) 18:22, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A view from Cape of Good Hope.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:39, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from St. James Beach, Cape Town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Penguins at Boulders Beach 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 19:18, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape near Zebra, Oudtshoorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dyal Singh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. (Minor CAs at the glasses.) --XRay 05:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jamie Tubers at Wikimedia Conference 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A homeless man sleeping in Cape Town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Sorry. but IMO these kind of images should be deleted. I think you have no permission to take a photograph of the person. Otherwise please add the permission (see permissions/OTRS). --XRay 05:11, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Yann 13:03, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Table Mountain, Cape Town 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments difficult to evaluate (because of haze, wide angle etc.) and I'm not a fan of the composition, bit the image quality seems to be good, esp. for a photo like this --Carschten 13:32, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maldivian dish - Kandu Kulkulhu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:08, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maldivian dish - Kandu Kulkulhu 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:03, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seafood Cataplana at World Heritage Cuisine Summit & Food Festival 2018 (Day 2) - 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support - This one is better than the one above.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mongolian Cuisine at World Heritage Cuisine Summit & Food Festival 2018 (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support - This one is a QI, IMO. I'm not sure about some of the others. -- Ikan Kekek 01:06, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cuisines at World Heritage Cuisine Summit & Food Festival 2018 (Day 2) - 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support - Not quite as good as 17.jpg, but the DoF is still sufficient for me. -- Ikan Kekek 01:36, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crab and Prawn Curry at World Heritage Cuisine Summit & Food Festival 2018 (Day 2) - 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support - DoF is sufficient for me. -- Ikan Kekek 01:36, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seafood Cataplana at World Heritage Cuisine Summit & Food Festival 2018 (Day 2) - 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support - Some viewers might object to the crops, but it's an acceptable closeup to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 01:42, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

your e-mail

Hello. Please try again now. --Krd 13:31, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maldivian dish - Kandu Kulkulhu 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Syed07 13:29, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your best shot 2018

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm wishing you all the best for the New Year and I hope you're going to have many memorable photo opportunities in 2019. With 2018 coming to an end, it's time to look back at the past 12 months. I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2018 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:

Your best shot 2018

Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:44, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Love help needed

Hello Satdeep Gill, You indicated to be willing to help and/or participate in the photo contest Wiki Loves Love. This photo contest starts on 1 February. To be able to make the photo contest more accessible and available to more people in the world, it needs translations of the upload wizard, templates and pages to your local language. Please help us! Go to Commons:Wiki Loves Love 2019/Translations to see how needs to be translated. (In some languages there are maybe already some translations available.) Thanks in advance!! For the international Wiki Loves Love organising team - Romaine (talk) 06:30, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Community Programs Team photo at All Hands 2019.jpg

File:Community Programs Team photo at All Hands 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

NSaad (WMF) (talk) 00:36, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your participation in Wiki Loves Love 2019

Wiki Loves Love 2019 has ended and team Wiki Loves Love sends you greetings and appreciation for joining us in spreading love around the globe and documents how love is expressed in different cultures. We hope to see you again in 2020. Till then stay tuned to know the results of WLL19 that will be out in this April. Please make sure that your email is enabled so we can communicate with you if you are one of our prize winners.(learn more how to do)

Best regards.

Wiki Loves Love International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:31, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bombax ceiba near Punjabi University, Patiala (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:17, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bombax ceiba near Punjabi University, Patiala (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:46, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bombax ceiba near Punjabi University, Patiala (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:20, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photo walk in Stockholm

It's only a few weeks until Wikimania 2019 in Sweden. I'd like to invite you to the Commons Photographer's photo walk. If you're planning on going to Stockholm in August, please consider joining this event. This is an opportunity to connect with other photographers, have fun together, and explore the beauty of an iconic Scandinavian city… All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Native Garhwali Woman In Rishikesh.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Native Garhwali Woman In Rishikesh.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manmohan Bawa at People's Literary Festival 2018 (02) (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:51, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buta Singh Brar at People's Literary Festival 2018 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:49, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Surjit Gag at People's Literary Festival 2018 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:53, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eiffel Tower Replica in Chandigarh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bant Singh Jhabbar at World Book Fair, New Delhi (2019) (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 14:59, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

বিশ্বের সর্ববৃহৎ ছবি প্রতিযোগিতায় অংশ নিন

সুপ্রিয় Satdeep Gill,

উইকিমিডিয়া বাংলাদেশ-এর আয়োজনে দেশের প্রত্নতাত্ত্বিক ও গুরুত্বপূর্ণ স্থাপনার ছবি নিয়ে বাংলাদেশে চতুর্থবারেরমত চলছে বিশ্বের সবচেয়ে বড় ছবি প্রতিযোগিতা উইকি লাভস মনুমেন্টস ২০১৯। ১ সেপ্টেম্বর থেকে শুরু হওয়া মাসব্যাপী স্থায়ী প্রতিযোগিতাটি ৩০ সেপ্টেম্বর পর্যন্ত চলবে। প্রতিযোগিতা পাতায় দেয়া বাংলাদেশের গুরুত্বপূর্ণ স্থাপনার তালিকা থেকে যেকোন সময় তোলা যেকোন স্থাপনার ছবি যত খুশি আপলোড করা যাবে। বিজয়ীদের জন্য আলাদাভাবে আন্তর্জাতিক ও জাতীয় পুরস্কার রয়েছে।

২০১৯ সালের প্রতিযোগিতায় অংশগ্রহণ সম্পর্কে বিস্তারিত জানতে ভিজিট করুন: উইকি লাভস মনুমেন্টস ২০১৯।
প্রতিযোগিতা সংক্রান্ত ব্লগ পোস্টে বিস্তারিত: উইকি লাভস মনুমেন্টস ২০১৯ শুরু।

আপনি যদি টুইটার ও ফেসবুকে থাকেন, তাহলে হালনাগাদ সংবাদ ও আরো তথ্যের জন্য @WLMBangladesh অনুসরণ করুন।

আপনার যদি কোনও প্রশ্ন থাকে, তাহলে নিঃসংকোচে ইমেইল করুন wlmwikimedia.org.bd ঠিকানায়। আসুন সবাই মিলে উইকিপিডিয়ার মাধ্যমে বাংলাদেশকে বিশ্ব দরবারে তুলে ধরি। ধন্যবাদ! আপনি এই বার্তাটি পাচ্ছেন কারণ আপনি এর পূর্বে উইকিমিডিয়া বাংলাদেশ আয়োজিত প্রতিযোগিতায় অংশ নিয়েছিলেন

#wlmBangladesh আয়োজক কমিটির পক্ষে,
নাহিদ সুলতান, মঙ্গলবার ২০:২৮, ০৩ সেপ্টেম্বর ২০১৯ (ইউটিসি)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Munkholmen, Trondheim 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:28, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Last Viking, Trondheim, Norway 02.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Last Viking, Trondheim, Norway 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Last Viking, Trondheim, Norway 03.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Last Viking, Trondheim, Norway 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Gamle Bybro, Trondheim 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Gamle Bybro, Trondheim 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:45, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Gamle Bybro, Trondheim 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good but too dark --Poco a poco 08:11, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done I think I fixed it. --Satdeep Gill 11:16, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --SH6188 06:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Munkholmen, Trondheim 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quite dark. Dust spots in the sky --Podzemnik 03:28, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Podzemnik: Done --Satdeep Gill 18:46, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Podzemnik: Just a small reminder. --Satdeep Gill 12:12, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Munkholmen, Trondheim 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spots in the sky. Can zou remove them please? --Podzemnik 03:28, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Podzemnik: Done --Satdeep Gill 18:46, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good good --Podzemnik 03:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sirhindi Gate, Patiala 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments for each photo you need a more detailed description but good for me -Armenak Margarian 07:08, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Gamle Bybro, Trondheim 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
@Cvmontuy: Done Done. Thanks for pointing that out. --Satdeep Gill 14:21, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --IM3847 18:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Munkholmen, Trondheim 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMO too dark. Fixable? --Podzemnik 03:28, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Podzemnik: Done --Satdeep Gill 18:46, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You uploaded a different picture --Podzemnik 03:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Podzemnik: , Aah! My bad. Thank you for poinitng that out. I fixed it now. --Satdeep Gill 05:20, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks --Podzemnik 03:00, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Last Viking, Trondheim, Norway 04.jpg

File:The Last Viking, Trondheim, Norway 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Podzemnik (talk) 21:09, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Samania Gate, Patiala 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:21, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Samania Gate, Patiala 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:20, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Samania Gate, Patiala 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:21, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Samania Gate, Patiala 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good photo, but vertical correction needed. --Manfred Kuzel 10:31, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Manfred Kuzel: Done Thanks for pointing that out. I hope the newer version works :) --Satdeep Gill 10:51, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
SupportGood quality now. --Manfred Kuzel 04:35, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Samania Gate, Patiala 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 05:19, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Gamle Bybro, Trondheim, Norway 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 04:07, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Code issues in User:Satdeep Gill/common.js

Hi Satdeep Gill, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

You edited User:Satdeep Gill/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

ISSUE: line 5 character 47: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: importScript('User:Magnus Manske/sdc_tool.js')

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 13:09, 23 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in India 9th prize

	Congratulations!!
	Your photograph has won the 9th prize for Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in India. We have sent you an e-mail and requested you to provide necessary details, so that you can receive the declared national prize. Thanks for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 09:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rubina Bajwa.jpg

File:Rubina Bajwa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Winged Blades^Godric 18:31, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amarjit Chandan and John Berger 03.jpg

File:Amarjit Chandan and John Berger 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Winged Blades^Godric 18:44, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Satdeep Gill,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Satdeep Gill,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your best shot 2019

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

It's early 2020, which means it's time again to look back at photographs taken over the course of the past 12 months. As always, I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2019 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:

Your best shot 2019

Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers User Group: Meeting on May 30, 2020

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I’d like to invite you to our group’s first Virtual Meeting on Saturday, May 30, 2020. The meeting will serve as an opportunity to get to know each other better, share learnings, and connect in times of the global COVID-19 pandemic.

Please take a look at the meeting page and add your name to the list of participants if you’re planning to attend.

Hope to see you in a week! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

বাংলাদেশে উইকি লাভস আর্থ ছবি প্রতিযোগিতা পুনরায় শুরু হয়েছে!

সুপ্রিয় Satdeep Gill! উইকিমিডিয়া বাংলাদেশ-এর আয়োজনে দেশের সংরক্ষিত প্রাকৃতিক বনাঞ্চল ও এর জীববৈচিত্র্যের ছবি নিয়ে বাংলাদেশে চতুর্থবারেরমত শুরু হয়েছে উইকিপিডিয়ার ছবি প্রতিযোগিতা উইকি লাভস আর্থ ২০২০। এক মাসব্যাপী স্থায়ী প্রতিযোগিতাটি ১ জুন, সোমবার থেকে শুরু হয়ে ৩০ জুন পর্যন্ত চলবে।

প্রতিযোগিতা পাতায় দেয়া তালিকা থেকে বাংলাদেশের প্রাকৃতিক সংরক্ষিত অঞ্চলের যেকোনো সময় তোলা ছবি জুন মাসে জমা দিয়ে প্রতিযোগিতায় অংশ নেওয়া যাবে। প্রতিযোগিতায় একজন একাধিক ছবি জমা দিতে পারবেন। প্রতিযোগিতা শেষে প্রতিটি দেশ থেকে সেরা ১০টি ছবি আন্তর্জাতিক বিচারকদের কাছে পাঠানো হবে এবং সব দেশের ছবি থেকে সেরা ১৫টি ছবি আন্তর্জাতিকভাবে বিজয়ী ঘোষণা করা হবে। বিজয়ীদের জন্য আলাদাভাবে আন্তর্জাতিক ও জাতীয় পুরস্কার রয়েছে।

২০২০ সালের প্রতিযোগিতায় অংশগ্রহণ সম্পর্কে বিস্তারিত জানতে ভিজিট করুন: উইকি লাভস আর্থ ২০২০।
আপনার যদি কোনও প্রশ্ন থাকে, তাহলে নিঃসংকোচে ইমেইল করুন wlewikimedia.org.bd ঠিকানায় অথবা যোগদান করতে পারেন ফেসবুকের facebook.com/groups/wlebangladesh গ্রুপে।

আপনি যদি টুইটার ও ফেসবুকে থাকেন, তাহলে হালনাগাদ সংবাদ ও আরো তথ্যের জন্য @WLEBangladesh অনুসরণ করুন। আসুন সবাই মিলে উইকিপিডিয়ার মাধ্যমে বাংলাদেশের প্রাকৃতিক সৌন্দর্য বিশ্ব দরবারে তুলে ধরি। ধন্যবাদ!

#wleBangladesh দলের পক্ষে,
নাহিদ সুলতান, শনিবার ১৭:০৭, ০৬ জুন ২০২০ (ইউটিসি)

আপনি এই বার্তাটি পাচ্ছেন কারণ আপনি এর পূর্বে উইকিমিডিয়া বাংলাদেশ আয়োজিত ছবি প্রতিযোগিতায় অংশ নিয়েছিলেন

File:Waris Shah.jpg was recently deleted

File:Waris Shah.jpg was recently deleted by Green Giant for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1): e.g. https://m.facebook.com/syedwarisalishah2016/photos/a.1778435965768261/1778436039101587

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:58, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers User Group: Meeting on September 26 and other stuff

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I've got a quick update for you, containing three items:

I’d like to invite you to our group’s second Virtual Meeting on Saturday, September 26, 2020. As last time, this meeting will serve as an opportunity to get to know each other better, share learnings, and connect in times of the global COVID-19 pandemic. If you'd like to present, please add your name and the proposed topic to the list on the talk page.
Also, I'd like to start a conversation about how we should be sharing responsibility for the user group going forward. I'd love to get some help when it comes to organizing things and I'm convinced that we can achieve more if a couple of people helped with coordinating stuff.
Finally, the Wikimedia Foundation has asked me to spread the word about their latest survey: Universal Code of Conduct Survey. The goal is to create a safer environment on Wikimedia projects and the Foundation gathers feedback prior to coming up with a first draft.

Hope to see you at the Zoom meeting in September!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:55, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Welcome to

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020
India

Hello Satdeep Gill/Archives!

From September 1 to September 30, 2020, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the tenth time. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year. You might remember this event as you had participated in one of the previous editions. We will be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record our monuments for future generations and win exciting prizes! You can find more details in this page.

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: User Group Meeting this Saturday

Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,

This is a quick reminder that our second virtual meeting will take place this Saturday, September 26. The agenda entails presentations about drone photography, about the story behind a featured picture, and about the future of LRMediaWiki. We'll also discuss photographers’ contacts with the Wikimedia Foundation and the election of representatives for our user group. You'll find information about all of this on the event page:

Virtual Meeting on September 26, 2020

I'm also inviting you to share some information about yourself and your photography work with other members of the user group on our new membership list:

Comprehensive membership list

I hope you're well during these difficult times. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers User Group meeting on Saturday

Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,

I'd like to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, December 12. We'll have two presentations: Habib Mhenni aka Dyolf77 will answer the question Do "we" need DSLRs anymore? and Martin Falbisoner will walk us through the making of his featured picture File:Caribbean_Sea_-_Long_Exposure.jpg.

If you can make it, please add your name to the list of attendees to this page:

Virtual Meeting on December 12, 2020

I hope to see you in three days. Also, I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2021. Your contributions to Commons make a big difference.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:16, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your most memorable shot 2020

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

Over the course of the past two years, we've been sharing pictures that have a special meaning with each other at the start of the new year. Today, I'm inviting you add your most memorable shot of 2020 to this page:

Your most memorable shot 2020

I hope you, your familiy, and your friends are well during these difficult times. I wish you all the best for 2021 and I can't wait to see what your most memorable shot of 2020 looks like.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:45, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dew kissed mustard flower 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dew kissed mustard flower 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dew kissed mustard flower 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pritam Uncle?

hi, I'm looking to get in touch with Pritam uncle ji. Any chance you can pass me his number? I am Gurdeep Singh Puri's son. Thanks

@Manpreet Puri: Hi, I don't understand anything. Which Pritam uncle? --Satdeep Gill (talk) 08:01, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Next Commons Photographers meeting featuring large format photographer Ben Horne

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm happy to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, March 20, at the usual time. As I mentioned during our last get-together, I'd like to invite external guests every now and then, given that it seems good to expand our view and learn something from someone outside our community.

Our first external guest, Ben Horne, will talk about large format wilderness photography, followed by a question-and-answer session. Ben is maybe one of best known contemporary large format photographers in the United States. On his excursions to national parks, he shoots 8×10 film and talks about his adventures on his YouTube channel which has attracted more than 48,000 followers so far. He is YouTube's first, and longest active landscape photography vlogger and I'm thrilled that he has agreed to join our next meeting and talk about his experiences.

If you're interested in joining this meeting, please sign up on the page below:

Virtual Meeting on March 20, 2020

Also, don't forget to post your question(s) prior to the meeting on the following page in order to ensure a good and fruitful question-and-answer session:

Questions for Ben

I'm very much looking forward to this event and I hope you'll be able to join.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonia Mann at Farmers' Protest (15th February 2021) 02 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good shot. Maybe you should add a category for a portrait of a woman. -- Ikan Kekek 17:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farmers' protest at Singhu Border (15 February 2021) (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Please add categories for the geographic location to this and your other images. --Tagooty 13:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Tagooty: I am not sure what exact category to add for that. --Satdeep Gill 11:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Category:New Delhi, Category for the district of Haryana see list in Category:Districts of Haryana, Category for the NH. --~~~~ --Tagooty 12:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Satdeep Gill 10:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK --LexKurochkin 15:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's Wiki Loves Food time!

Wiki Loves Food 2021
India

Hello Satdeep Gill/Archives!

Do you roam around in search of delicious mouth-watering foods and take photographs of them before you put them into your mouth? Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India photo-competition is then waiting for you! Participate in the competition from March 15 to April 14 this year, photograph and upload all kinds of foods and beverages originated from or found in Indian sub-continent and get a chance to win exciting prizes!

-- Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India team
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Commons Photographers meeting tomorrow

Just a quick reminder: the meeting with large format-photographer Ben Horne will happen tomorrow, Saturday, March 20. If you haven't done yet, please consider signing up for the event and add your questions to this page. This will be our first virtual meeting in 2021 and I'd be super happy if you could join. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rasgulla preparation for Indian wedding 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMO the image is a little bit too dark. --XRay 05:36, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have increased the exposure a little. How is it now? --Satdeep Gill 06:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO it's acceptable. Honestly, it's only weak promotion. --XRay 06:24, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rasgulla preparation for Indian wedding 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Oppose Sorry, IMO the crop should be better (and the image is too dark). --XRay 05:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@XRay: Thanks for the feedback. How does it look now? --Satdeep Gill 06:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support A weak promotion only. IMO more space at top and bottom would be better. --XRay 06:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laddu preparation for Punjabi wedding 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Very nice. DimiTalen 06:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farmers' protest at Singhu Border (15 February 2021) (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farmers' protest at Singhu Border (15 February 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A farmer in Kerala 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boiled corn cob in Araku Valley, Andhra Pradesh 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jassie Gill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:53, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in Trondheim, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A farmer in Kerala 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A farmer in Kerala 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A farmer in Kerala 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:54, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viva La Revolution with a cycle in front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA on the leaves and branches. --F. Riedelio 15:11, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@F. Riedelio: Done I have uploaded a newer version of the image after fixing CA and also a better crop IMO and few other edits. Let me know what you think. --Satdeep Gill 05:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 13:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A farmer in Kerala 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Some might take issue with the bottom crop, but I think it's a nice portrait worth promoting to QI. Only thing: please improve the categorization (it's not categorized for the farmer, for example). --Rhododendrites 15:44, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rhododendrites: Done --Satdeep Gill 04:43, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 17:49, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rasgulla preparation for Indian wedding 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chicken tikka in Araku Valley, Andhra Pradesh 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 14:09, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Homemade hummus and pita 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A bit underexposed --Wilfredor 15:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Wilfredor: Done Thanks for the feedback. --Satdeep Gill 07:28, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 18:28, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your QIs added to "Quality images of India by user"

I see that you are one of the leading Indian contributors of QIs. In order to increase the visibility of QI of India, I've created the category CAT:Quality images of India by User:Satdeep Gill in CAT:Quality images of India by user. I've populated this category with the images of India from CAT:Quality images by User:Satdeep Gill (to the best of my ability). Please add others that I may have missed and correct any mistakes. --Tagooty (talk) 06:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Tagooty, Thank you for creating these categories. I will check and add images in case you missed any. Satdeep Gill (talk) 13:12, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for category name change

Hello Satdeep, I created a category on wikimedia commons which is name "Category:Har Haipur (Tin koni) Bathinda". After created this category i find spelling mistake on category's name. Please change the name of category 'Har Haipur (Tin koni) Bathinda' into Har Raipur (Tin koni) Bathinda. I will be great thank full of you. Stalinjeet Brar (talk) 16:53, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yama and Savitri by Nandlal Bose 1913 (cropped).jpg

File:Yama and Savitri by Nandlal Bose 1913 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fæ (talk) 10:22, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:ਚੰਦ੍ਰਕਾਂਤਾ.pdf

File:ਚੰਦ੍ਰਕਾਂਤਾ.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fæ (talk) 10:25, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Randeep Purewall.jpg

File:Randeep Purewall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2001:569:7CEB:7300:1DA7:B69B:AB16:BB3E 06:10, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spear 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:49, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Churn 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:15, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wooden hand masher 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:22, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neti and Gadvi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice items and good quality, but please select some more specific categories. -- Ikan Kekek 04:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done I have replaced the category with an appropriate one! Perhaps a new category should be created as well. --Satdeep Gill 04:39, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment When I do a web search on "Neti and Gadvi", I'm getting results like "Copper Water Pot" and "Copper Water Pot Lid". I usually think of utensils as being mainly cutlery (forks, spoons, kitchen knives, etc.). -- Ikan Kekek 08:07, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Gadwi is is a water container and I consider containers as part of utensils as well. The Punjabi description in the image says that this combination has a connection with Punjabi weddings. I have added another relevant category as well. --Satdeep Gill 13:14, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't consider that a utensil, but that's probably a difference between American usage and usage in other parts of the English-speaking world (I think including Great Britain). I think you are right that there should be another category more specific to this kind of subject. -- Ikan Kekek 20:00, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Share Your Struggle 2021 - A public photo competition (15 - 31 August)

Share Your Struggle 2021 (15 - 31 August 2021) is a public photo competition on Wikimedia Commons. The goal of the project is to improve coverage of free usable media files related to various struggles, such as, natural disasters, health crises such as COVID-19 pandemic, social movements, conflict-torn areas, and any other humanitarian crises. The goal is not only to document crises, but also humanitarian efforts and acts of kindness that happen during such crises.

Submit photographs/videos and win prizes! Check the campaign page on Wikimedia Commons for more information to participate. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:51, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Welcome to

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021
India

Hello Satdeep Gill/Archives!

We are excited again to let you know that, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the 12th time this year. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year from September 1 to September 30, 2021. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record and digitally document our monuments for future generations and get a chance to win exciting prizes! You can find more details about the Indian part of the competition in this page. See you in action in few hours!!

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:11, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding extension of deadline

@Satdeep Gill: Is the contest Share Your Struggle 2021's deadline going to be extended ? If yes, What will be the next deadline ?--Prajjwal3959 (talk) 06:27, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Prajjwal3959 Yes, we are extending the deadline and the new deadline is 15 September 2021. Satdeep Gill (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farmers' Protest at Tikri Border - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality, but the signature in the bottom-right needs removing per the image guidelines. --Y.ssk 13:36, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Let me do that! --Satdeep Gill 04:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Done --Satdeep Gill 04:59, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks good now. Thanks! --Y.ssk 06:47, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How to upload video

@Satdeep Gill: I have uploaded a video for share your struggle 2021. This is the first i uploaded a video on commons. Can you please just check [1] it do me confirm that the uploaded video has been uploaded properly. --Prajjwal3959 (talk) 10:48, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Indian Farmers' Protest by Ravan Khosa 37 (ed RE1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Indian Farmers' Protest by Ravan Khosa 37 (ed RE1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Indian Farmers' Protest by Ravan Khosa 45.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Indian Farmers' Protest by Ravan Khosa 45.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers meeting on October 30th

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm happy to invite you to our next virtual meeting next Saturday, October 30. This time, our colleagues User:Dey.sandip from India and User:Ermell from Germany will talk about their work.

If you're interested in joining this meeting, please sign up on the page below:

5th virtual meeting of the Commons Photographers User Group

I'm very much looking forward to this event and I hope you'll be able to join.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers User Group: first board election

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

In preparation of the first board election of our group, I invite you to take a look at the following page:

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2021

and provide feedback. I've listed a number of positions for our first board and I've also outlined a possible timeline for the elections. The current plan is to open the self-nomination process up on November 15 and then have the election start on December 1.

I'm super excited to get this going and I'm very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.

I hope you're safe and well, and I wish you all the best! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers elections: self-nomination phase is open

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

The self-nomination phase for the first board election of our group is open as of today. If you'd like to take on a more active role and take our user group to the next level, please consider running for one of the open positions. Please check out the Board Election 2021 page for more details.

I hope you, your family, and your friends are doing well. All the best! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Board election: voting is open!

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

The voting phase for our group's board election starts today. Please consider casting your vote. Voting ends on December 17.

I wish you all the best for the rest of the year 2021. Stay safe and healthy! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Share your Struggle 2021 India Campaign prize winners declared

Greetings @User:Satdeep_Gill,

We are delighted to inform you that our jury has announced the winners of Share Your Struggle 2021, the first-ever public photo competition in India. We have published the list of winners on the event page.

Congratulations! The photographs uploaded by you on behalf of the authors ‘Jaskaran’ and ‘Ravan Khosa’ for Share Your Struggle 2021 have won prizes. To claim the prizes, please forward this form to authors or fill their details on or before 10 January 2022. The awarded prize money either in the form of Amazon or Flipkart gift cards, depending on their preference.

Thank you,

On behalf of the Share Your Struggle 2021 team,

--Nivas10798 (talk) 14:55, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your most memorable shot of 2021

Happy New Year! As always at the beginning of the new year, I'm inviting you to share your most memorable shot of the past year. Which of your photos stood out in 2021? Which image created special memories that you'd like to share with others? On behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2022. Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chandikesvara statue at Pondicherry Museum 11 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jyestha Devi statue at Pondicherry Museum 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Images of Dirk Trost

Hallo Satdeep Gill,

I have no idea what that VTRS communication included, but since I am not sure you read German, I thought I'd update you on this case from the German WP perspective. It's basically the usual misunderstanding: The uploader believes that the person in the image has bought all the rights and doesn't seem to understand that the copyright (by German law) ALWAYS remains with the photographer. She also does not understand that uploading something as "own work" means that it should be own work. This has all been explained to her multiple times now by different users on different pages; it seems a pretty hopeless case: She just put all the pictures back into that article even though several people had told her not to do so until the copyright issue is cleared up.

The article these pictures are meant for is currently being discussed for deletion, so it's by no means sure that these pictures will ever serve a purpose here anyway. --217.239.4.223 01:30, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is exactly what I asked the person. To get a permission from the photographer. Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:12, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright on Bishkek International School logo

Hello Satdeep Gill. This image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bishkek_International_School_logo.png under permissions says I need to contact you to prove that I can publish this image. The image is a school logo and I sent an email to the school and asked for the permission for this image and got permission. Can I maybe somehow send you the email, if it even is sufficient enough evidence? I don't have any other evidence othen than the permission email... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gustamons (talk • contribs) 06:56, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gustamons Can you ask the school to send a release email to VRT. Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Satdeep Gill. I have asked the school to send the permission letter to VRT and they said they have. Waiting for an answer now. --Gustamons (talk) 07:52, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asian green bee-eater in Nasirpur, Patiala 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Matutinho 07:26, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Indian stone-curlew in Nasirpur, Patiala 03 (cropped) (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Matutinho 07:36, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red-naped Ibis in Patiala.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 06:52, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phalaris minor in Jalalpur, Patiala district 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 08:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The image noise should be reduced and the white should be increased a little. --Steindy 08:52, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Steindy: Kindly check. --Satdeep Gill 09:23, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty now! Good quality. --Steindy 00:01, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phalaris minor in Jalalpur, Patiala district 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The image noise should be reduced and the white should be increased a little. --Steindy 08:52, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Steindy: Kindly check. --Satdeep Gill 09:23, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty now! Good quality. --Steindy 00:01, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phalaris minor in Jalalpur, Patiala district 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The image noise should be reduced and the white should be increased a little. --Steindy 08:54, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Steindy: Kindly check. --Satdeep Gill 09:23, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty now! Good quality. --Steindy 00:01, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wild mushroom in Jalalpur, Patiala district 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Imo it needs at least basic identification + the category does not exist. --Nefronus 08:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:54, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Satdeep Gill, thanks for creating a category. I am guessing there are many more photos that should be moved into it, so that's your mission, if you choose to perform it. -- Ikan Kekek 21:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asian green bee-eater in Nasirpur, Patiala 02 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
needs a crop --Charlesjsharp 08:09, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Charlesjsharp: --Satdeep Gill 06:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 16:07, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Indian stone-curlew in Nasirpur, Patiala 01 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
needs a crop --Charlesjsharp 08:09, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Charlesjsharp: --Satdeep Gill 06:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 16:07, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rufous treepie at Hunky Dory Resort near Pathankot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:18, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]