User talk:Rakás

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rakás!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:51, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Műemléki azonosítók

Szia! Szeretném felhívni a figyelmedet, hogy a 'monument Hungary' sablonba írandó azonosító nem azonos a huwiki 'xx megye műemlékeinek listája' lapokon szereplő törzsszámmal! Kérlek, ne írj be téves adatot, ha nem tudod a helyeset! Köszönöm. --Rlevente (talk) 18:41, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

És egy kérés: ne tölts fel időbélyeges képeket, mert azt tiltják a Commons szabályai. --Rlevente (talk) 18:48, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Court_houses_in_Hungary

Court houses in Hungary has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 19:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorizálás

Üdv! A szándékod nyilván jó volt [1], nem tudom, hogy máshol is kategorizáltál hasonlóképpen, de van egy igen egyszerű szabály, amit jobb figyelembe venni: Túlkategorizálás: „A fő irányelv az, hogy egy képet mindig a lehető legpontosabb kategóriába tegyél, de a kategória felettiekbe már ne.“. Üdv, Fauvirt (talk) 11:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vármegyék

Szia, szép de nem igazán értem a gyakorlati hasznát annak hogy magyarul is kategorizáljunk már nem létező vármegyerendszerbe. Kérlek győzz meg, mert különben törlésre javaslom. Hogy lásd mire gondolok: [2] Üdv. Taz666 (talk) 15:35, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Azt értem hogy jó ötletnek találod, de mi benne a lényeg? Ezek ugyanis létező és már kategorizált szócikkek (pl. nyitra megyei/ járási települések) és a ma létező állami közigazgatás szerint találja meg őket az aki keresi. A commonsot én legalábbis segédprojektnek tartom, a magyar wikin magyar nevükön vannak a települések (szlovák redirrel), sőt a képek is lehetnek magyar nevűek, de más wikin és a kategória a commonson szlovákul (angolul), mivel egy külföldi vagy szlovák valószínűleg ezen a néven fogja keresni. Ha az ötlet az hogy az egykori közigazgatási felosztás szerint is megtalálható legyen, akkor azt talán előbb a magyar wikin kéne megvalósítani, nem elsősorban kategóriák segítségével, hanem szócikkel pl. így: Ógyallai járás, vagy Verebélyi járás, de itt is évkörrel különbséget kell tenni, ugyanis a csehszlovák érában is létezett verebélyi járás. De ha nem erre gondoltál jelezd. Taz666 (talk) 18:44, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ikarus 55 Jobbik.jpg

File:Ikarus 55 Jobbik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 20:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's true. I don't understand, what happened, but the picture is really terrible. --Rakás (talk) 20:29, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Káli templom képe nem a káli templomot ábrázolja

Szia Rakás!

Úgy tűnik az általad feltöltött kép nem Kál katolikus templomát ábrázolja, noha az a címe és a huwiki cikkébe is beillesztetted. Erről itt találsz egy beszélgetést. Segíts kibogozni, hogy ez hogyan lehet! És ez tényleg a te képed? Kösz: Piraeus (talk) 23:02, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Szia! Kösz a választ, látom közben tisztázódott a dolog és kiderült, hogy az tényleg nem a káli templom. Megtennéd, hogy vagy törölteted a képet, vagy átnevezteted és kiszeded azokból az interwiki cikkekből, ahol tévesen szerepel? Piraeus (talk) 19:46, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Our Lady of Hungary Church, Nagytálya.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Our Lady of Hungary Church, Nagytálya.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:St. Roch Cemetery Chapel, Eger.JPG

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:02, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nemek szerinti kategóriák

Szia! Mi alapján bontottál szét egy rakás foglalkozási kategóriát nemek szerint (pl. Male journalists from Hungary és Female journalists from Hungary)? A Commonsban néhány kivételtől eltekintve (pl. színészek, énekesek) a nemzetiség+foglalkozás szerinti kategóriákat nem szokás tovább osztani kétfelé. Einstein2 (talk) 08:38, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

szia

megkérhtlek téged hogy amiket én feltötötem be teszed wikipédában anzoknak megfelelő szóclikbe

ja is keres it ha irni akarsz valamit -https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Garbera_levente

szia

a borbánya szóclik a wikipédában rövid szeretném ha ki bővitenénk segienél majd is léci ted mán majd be aszt a képet is ird oda kép leirás nak hogy borbánya egyik lakó része is majd köszönom a sgicségedet

Zentai Márk

Szia! Bocs, de levettem a Magyar Színház kategóriát, mert a darabnak a kategóriája, amiben ott (vendég)szerepelt, már benne van. Üdv! Fauvirt (talk) 21:44, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

szia

a magyar wikipédiában létre hoznád eszta két szócliket ami it alul leirok előre is köszönöm

nyíregyházi Göllesz Viktor Speciális Szakiskola, Általános Iskola
Nyíregyházi Bárczi Gusztáv Speciális Iskola

Levelet kaptam, life.

	Hello, Rakás. You have new messages at Grin's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Category:Shopping_centers_in_Hungary

Shopping centers in Hungary has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

195.50.31.213 22:19, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Calvary_Chapel_an_Church,_Gyöngyös

Category:Calvary_Chapel_an_Church,_Gyöngyös has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Globetrotter19 (talk) 18:02, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pográctelep

Category:Pográctelep has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Globetrotter19 (talk) 13:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Tapolca–Ukk-vasútvonal.svg

Szia! Kérésedre a képet javítottam.

Amúgy az SVG formátum előnye, hogy sima szövegszerkesztővel (pl. notepad-del) is javítható, főleg a szöveget tartalmazó részek. A vonalak és stílusok leírására szolgáló rész javítását már nem tanácsolnám, de ha lesz idő és kedv összedobok vmi leírást, hogy hogyan lehet egyszerűen javítgatni ezeket a vasútvonalas térképeket. Üdv JolietJake (Hu) (talk) 11:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Szia! Elkészítettem az útmutatót, remélem segítettem. JolietJake (Hu) (talk) 14:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kelenföld BKV bus terminal (Őrmező side)

Szia! Ennek nem lehetne valami jobb nevet adni? A címében BKV, a képeken meg egy VT-s és egy volános busz. :) Kemenymate (talk) 19:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kemenymate: Ja, a buszállomás nevére gondolsz? Mi volna jobb szerinted? Végül is át lehet nevezni, ha ennyire nem tetszik. --Rakás (talk) 19:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lehetne mondjuk Kelenföld bus terminal (Őrmező side), Kelenföld bus terminal (Lágymányos side) meg Kelenföld bus terminal (Volánbusz). Vagy utóbbi Kelenföld suburban bus terminal. Még arra gondoltam, hogy BKV helyett BKK, de nem tudom kié pontosan a terület, így lehet az se lenne túl szerencsés. Kemenymate (talk) 19:14, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cities and villages in Pest-Pilis-Solt-Kiskun County

Szia! Látom a XVI. kerület több városrészét is beletetted a Category:Cities and villages in Pest-Pilis-Solt-Kiskun County-ba... esetleg azért, mert korábban önálló települések voltak?... mert lehet, hogy inkább egy alkategóriának kéne akkor lennie (pl. Past cities and villages in Pest-Pilis-Solt-Kiskun County - bár nem vagyok angolos, ezért lehet,hogy ez így helytelen...)... mit gondolsz? Fauvirt (talk) 14:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Fauvirt: Szia! Ma már olyan nagyon én se tudok angolul, de ilyen esetekre a former jelzőt szokták használni, nem a past-ot vagy bármi mást. Ha a commons keresőjébe elkezded beírni, hogy Category:Former ..., akkor láthatod magad is. Szerintem fölösleges ennyire cifrázni, hiszen a vármegyék is történelemnek számítanak ma már. Legalábbis a megnevezésük ezen formája. De még azoknak a (vár)megyéknek is megváltozott a területe mára a szomszédai hasznára vagy kárára — vagy akár egyszerre mindkettőre (pl. Heves és Nógrád esete)—, ahol a megye megnevezéséből csak a vár- előtag tűnt el. Szóval én nem szívesen bonyolítanám túl a dolgot. Rakás (talk) 15:13, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ááá! Utánamentem egy kicsit és segítséget kértem egy angol ismerősömtől... ő elmondta, hogy a "village" nem csak falu/község, hanem közigazgatási egység is és így már akár stimmel is... úhogy bár Sashalomnál kivettem már ezt a kategóriát, most visszaraktam. Bocsi a zargatásért! :o) Fauvirt (talk) 17:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Fauvirt: Szia! Nem zargattál! Pédául Romániában, Ausztriában vagy Szerbiában kettős szint van az alapegységek tekintetében. Vannak a municipiumok, ezeket fordítjuk községnek, és vannak a hozzájuk beosztott falvak. Bár a muninicipiumok lehetnek városok is. Ha bármely romániai település cikkét megnézed, alul a sablonok közt megtalálod azt, amiről beszélek. Persze ez Magyarországon szokatlan lehet, mert itt nemigen volt ilyesmi sohasem, legalábbis az én tudomásom szerint. --Rakás (talk) 18:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Novija crkva u Budimpešti.JPG

Across the street from the hotel Griff.

--August Dominus (talk) 21:34, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Visszavonás (Jászberény)

Visszavontam a szerkesztésed, mert a kategóriához illik a tanárképző főiskola, még ha most nem is akkor is az volt. További jó szekesztést! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 11:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Rendben, igazad van. Neked is jó szerkesztést! Rakás (talk) 11:16, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1956

Szia! A Category:Hungarian Revolution of 1956 in Budapest kategóriában 800 – nagyrészt a Fortepanról származó – kép van. Nincs kedved alkategóriákra bontani (pl. helyszínek, események vagy dátumok szerint)? --Rlevente (talk) 05:55, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Rlevente: Szia! Első ránézésre úgy tűnik nekem, hogy nagyjából el vannak helyezve helyszín és esemény szerint, de azért jobban is rá fogok nézni. Bár meg kell jegyeznem, nem vagyok otthon a témában. Üdv.: --Rakás (talk) 07:25, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Igen, mert Pe-Jo már elkezdte a kategorizálást. --Rlevente (talk) 09:01, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Algyői tisza híd ügye

Ne mozgass magyar objaktumneveket angol fordításnevek alá! Már jópárszor megbeszéltük, hogy a magyar név a hivatalos, mint a pályaudvarok esetében. Hálás köszönet - Beroesz (talk) 06:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons by country

Hello, Rakás. I noticed that you removed Category:Seasons by country from several categories, including Category:Seasons in Austria. Please leave that category on the categories for individual countries. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ikarus 208

Szia! A 208-as így néz ki: [3] :) Kemenymate (talk) 18:13, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category: Jewish cemetery in Felsőábrány (Bükkábrány)

Hi, I have some ancestors buried in this cemetery and would like to contact you about this. Thanks.--Jo scho (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo scho: Hi! What do You interested in? Maybe I can help, but it's no sure. --Rakás (talk) 06:39, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Muki (tramway)

I just struggled over Category:Muki (tramway) which I found in the Category:Electric rack locomotives. I can't see in which way these vehïcles could be "rack" locomotives. Thus I have removed the category.-- Gürbetaler (talk) 21:00, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People by name et al.

Hi, please note that Category:People by name, Category:Men by name and Category:Women by name are flat categories, which should not be removed while adding i.e. Category:Women of Hungary or similer. Thx, --Ju Ta 15:01, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I still see you removing these cats. Please stop this! thx. --Ju Ta 16:13, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JuTa: Hi! Meta categories misses between the upper and the lower categories from the cat hierarchy by me. Maybe it's problem. What do You think? --Rakás (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think you should just stop to remove those flat categories. You are highly welcome if you add other (sensefull) categories, but leave the meta- or flat-categories as they are. regards --Ju Ta 17:47, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Districts_in_Hungary

Districts in Hungary has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Globetrotter19 (talk) 21:46, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:District_halls_in_Hungary

Category:District_halls_in_Hungary has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Globetrotter19 (talk) 22:26, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Egyképes kategóriák

Szia! Ilyen kategóriákra mi szükség van? Azon kívül, hogy bénán néz ki egy egyetlen képből álló kategória, még értelmük sincs – a kategóriák elvileg az összetartozó képeket gyűjtenék. – Tacsipacsi (talk) 15:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Somodor, Som-Nagyberény, Baté, Pannonhalma. Ha jól tudom, a Wikipédián ezért blokk jár, amíg nem reagálsz; nem hiszem, hogy itt nagyon másképp lenne. – Tacsipacsi (talk) 12:54, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tacsipacsi: Már a múlt héten is eléggé megdöbbentem a kérdéseden! Egy ilyen tapasztalt szerkesztőtől nem vártam volna. A válaszom az, hogy több éves szerkesztői tapasztalatom alapján az egyetlen érv ellene a kétségtelen szemantikai probléma, ami valóban fennáll ilyen esetben. Ezzel szemben az előnyei viszont számosak, megegyeznek azokkal, amikben több fájl is található. Például összeköthető a wd-elemmel, stb. Rakás (talk) 10:05, 17 June 2018 (UTC) Ja, és az elsőnek felhozott példád már nem aktuális, csak hogy szóljak. Rakás (talk) 10:07, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Igen, látom. Most már van értelme – akkor kellett volna létrehozni őket, amikor fel lett töltve a második kép. Én viszont azon vagyok megdöbbenve, hogy egy ilyen tapasztalt szerkesztő válasz nélkül folytatja a kifogásolt szerkesztést. Megpróbálhatsz meggyőzni, hogy miért jó ez (eddig még nem sikerült), viszont az, ha nem válaszolsz (és közben újabb kategóriákat hozol létre), számomra elfogadhatatlan. Jó lenne, ha kibontanád a „stb.”-t; a Wikidata-elemmel való összekötés szerintem nem jelent semmi plusz előnyt: ha egyetlen kép van, az amúgy is össze van kötve a Wikidatával, a image (P18) segítségével. – Tacsipacsi (talk) 11:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nemesgulács vs. Hegymagas

File:Nemesgulács Lengyel kápolna templom 2.JPG kép Nemesgulács-hoz van feltéve [4]!

File:Nemesgulács Lengyel kápolna 1.JPG Ez a kép teljesen más mint a többi! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 19:17, 16 August 2018 (UTC) @Globetrotter19: Nem ismerem, csak a feltöltő munkásságára hagyatkoztam. Köszi, hogy ránéztél! --Rakás (talk) 19:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nagycenki Széchenyi Múzeumvasút vs. Category:Széchenyi Railway Museum‎

Szia. Meg tudnád nézni a fennti két oldalt nekem elég félreérthetőnek tünik.

Esetleg az egyik kategória a másik alkategóriája? Ha nem akkor is talán más név jobb lenne? pl Széchenyi Múzeumvasút helyett Széchenyi Múzeumvasútvonal vagy Historical‎ railway line vagy hasonló? - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 22:21, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Köszi, hogy felhívtad rá a figyemet! További jó szerkesztést Neked!

Done Rakás (talk) 07:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Budakalász chapel.jpg

Szia! Ez a kép hol készült? Az utcaképből leginkább Szentistvántelepre tippelnék, de ez elég vad tipp, a leírólap pedig nem sok támpontot ad. – Tacsipacsi (talk) 12:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tacsipacsi: Nem Szentistvántelep, hanem a főutca a falusi katolikus templom közelében, Budai út 56. [5] Rakás (talk) 15:26, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Köszönöm! Mondtam, hogy vad tipp a Szentistvántelep, ezek szerint mellélőttem. (Egyébként mi az, hogy falusi? Budakalász már évek óta város! Próbáld csak ezt mondani egy lokálpatrióta kalászinak…

) – Tacsipacsi (talk) 16:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tacsipacsi: ez a kép ábrázolja a szentistvántelepi templomot. --Rakás (talk) 17:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Male_diplomats_of_Hungary

Male diplomats of Hungary has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:45, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Országos Kéktúra stamps

These are not stamps, as in postage stamps. What are they? They are some sort of markings and this categorisation is wrong. Please advise, so it can be revised. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 13:02, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved this to Category:Országos Kéktúra trail signs per other similar signs. Ww2censor (talk) 16:35, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

== Category:Szentlélek templom (Veresegyház) == OK --Rakás (talk) 15:27, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Szia! A véleményed kérdezném. Ezt nem kellene átnevezni? Pl. Category:Holy Spirit Church (Veresegyház) ra. Válaszod előre is köszönöm. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 15:22, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: . De, már át is neveztem. --Rakás (talk) 15:27, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Köszönöm. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 15:29, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Szívesen, de ha már itt jártál, a hölvényi (ezt már kértem), meg a kiskálnai fájlokat átnevezhetnéd a megfelelő falunévre. Nem szeretem, ha keverik a faluneveket. Megtennéd? --Rakás (talk) 15:33, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Melyik is? - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 15:35, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Category:Hulvinky, Category:Kalnica (Kalná nad Hronom) --Rakás (talk) 15:40, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Az elsőt megtaláltam, a többit nem látom melyiket mire kell nevezni? - - --Globetrotter19 (talk) 15:44, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Category:Reformed church in Kalnica. Kálna nad Hronom (Nagykálna) helyett Kalnica (Kiskálna) Köszönöm az eddigieket is Rakás (talk) 15:51, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nem értem. Most 'Reformed church in Kalnica' kat.-ban van a Kálna nad Hronom kép ez legyen pl Reformed church in Kalnica ill. a Kálna- (13) legyen Református templom, Kiskálna? - - --Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Igen, hiszen Kálna nad Hronom Nagykálnát jelenti, ez a templom viszont Kiskálnán (Kalnica) van. Rakás (talk) 16:04, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Köszönöm

Köszönöm, hogy a helyes kategóriákba helyezte Eger fotóit! --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 08:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sacred Heart Church in Ajkarendek

A http://miserend.hu/templom/2283 szerint ez Szent Márton püspök-templom! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 14:41, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Úgy látszik, valóban! Ezek szerint összekevertem valamelyik másikkal, köszi! Tedd meg a szükséges lépéseket. A kategóriát már át is neveztem. Rakás (talk) 14:48, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kész! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 14:56, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sacred Heart Church in Tósokberénd

Ez se jó! A http://miserend.hu/templom/2281 szerint Szent István király-templom! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 15:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Lásd mint fent. Tudod: Szerkessz bátran! Rakás (talk) 15:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kész! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 15:22, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lakos Mansion in Ajka

Szia! Az iránt érdeklódnék, hogy honnan vetted hogy ez Lakos-kastély Lakos-ház volt? Én azt találtam, hogy 18. században épült egykori evangélikus lelkészlak itt és itt is. Szerintem jobb lenne átnevezni Ajka Városi Múzeum és Fotógaléria-ra. - - --Globetrotter19 (talk) 17:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Úgy tűnik, hogy igen. Ez most a Városi Múzeum (Szabadság tér 2-4.) Én Lakos János tábornok szülőházának olvastam ott helyben a házon elhelyezett emléktáblán (mert van rajta). Üdv: Rakás (talk) 17:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Van képed róla? Az épületen kívül? - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 18:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Nekem sajnos nincs. Az interneten néztem most utána, hogy tudjak válaszolni a kérdésedre. --Rakás (talk) 18:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Találtál valamit? - - --Globetrotter19 (talk) 18:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: [6] Amúgy az épület az épület a kép bal szélén látható. A múzeum honlapja szerint valóban evangélikus lelkészlak volt --Rakás (talk) 18:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Igen tudom És van is rajta vagy fél tucat emléktábla (legalábbis amit én fotóztm), de Lakos egy se. Amúgy itt Szabadság tér 19-nek írják itt is nem 2-4-nek. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 18:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Én azt az emléktáblát olvastam, ami a háromablakos végénél van a hosszú oldalon. Azon az szerepel hogy ott született Lakos János. Ebből feltételeztem azt, hogy kúria/kastély volt. De nem. Lelkészlak volt. --Rakás (talk) 18:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Igen megtaláltam. Azt írja itt született Lakos János Kazinczy barátja. Azért átneveznéd? - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 18:54, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: De mire? Nem volna egyszerűbb, ha Te tennéd meg? Jobban értesz hozzá. Rakás (talk) 19:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ajka Városi Múzeum és Fotógaléria az rendben van? - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 19:04, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Legyen úgy! Rakás (talk) 19:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Köszönöm. Más. Van egy emléktábla? ugyanitt a falon!, hogy Borsos Miklós park. Nem tudod véletlen, hogy az az egész Templomdombi park neve? - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 19:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Bocsi, közben elaludtam. Ezt sajnos nem tudom. Rakás (talk) 03:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:József_Gregor_Elementary_School,_Rákosliget

József Gregor Elementary School, Rákosliget has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Globetrotter19 (talk) 13:02, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Eger Stream, Eger.JPG

And also:

File:Tarnaszentmária 3.JPG

Üdvözlettel, Regasterios (talk) 16:31, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Etyekwood01.jpg

File:Etyekwood01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rosenzweig τ 15:12, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Chiefs of General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Hungary

Kedves Rakás! Itt valami nagy gond van, nem csak a Magyar Köztársaság, hanem a Magyar Királyság vezérkari főnökei is szerepelnek a kategóriában, csakúgy, mint annak a szülőkategóriájában, amit szintén Te hoztál létre. Rendet kellen csinálni sürgősen. Szilas (talk) 13:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sculptors István Szabó Jr & Sr.jpg

File:Sculptors István Szabó Jr & Sr.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Source site under non-commercial license.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Regasterios (talk) 13:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:A szentkúti szabadtéri oltár mozaikkompozíciója (2014).jpg

File:A szentkúti szabadtéri oltár mozaikkompozíciója (2014).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Source site under non-commercial license.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Regasterios (talk) 13:21, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Map of Nagybátony.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Map of Nagybátony.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 13:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Map of Maconka.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Map of Maconka.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 13:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Zsámánd

Zsámánd has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--Hanzlan (talk) 12:45, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ége

Ége has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 02:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Emperor_of_Danube-Budapest_railway_accident

Category:Emperor_of_Danube-Budapest_railway_accident has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Tacsipacsi (talk) 11:17, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Felekezetek

Szia, tudom, hogy régen volt, de ezen a képen nem a katolikus templom található a háttérben, hanem a református. Viszont mivel éppen mert régen volt a szerkesztésed, csaknem tíz éve, félő, hogy más wikikbe beszivárgott, hogy ez a kutasi rk. templom, holott nem. Pasztilla (talk) 19:24, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Raul Cătinaș

Category:Raul Cătinaș is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Doclys👨‍⚕️👩‍⚕️ ^{🩺 • 💉} 05:33, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Rakás

Műemléki azonosítók

Kategorizálás

Vármegyék

Káli templom képe nem a káli templomot ábrázolja

Copyright status: File:Our Lady of Hungary Church, Nagytálya.JPG

Nemek szerinti kategóriák

szia

szia

Zentai Márk

szia

Levelet kaptam, life.

Re: Tapolca–Ukk-vasútvonal.svg

Cities and villages in Pest-Pilis-Solt-Kiskun County

Novija crkva u Budimpešti.JPG

Visszavonás (Jászberény)

1956

Algyői tisza híd ügye

Seasons by country

Ikarus 208

Category: Jewish cemetery in Felsőábrány (Bükkábrány)

Category:Muki (tramway)

Category:People by name et al.

Egyképes kategóriák

Nemesgulács vs. Hegymagas

Category:Nagycenki Széchenyi Múzeumvasút vs. Category:Széchenyi Railway Museum‎

Budakalász chapel.jpg

Köszönöm

Category:Sacred Heart Church in Ajkarendek

Category:Sacred Heart Church in Tósokberénd

Notification about possible deletion

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Map of Nagybátony.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Map of Maconka.jpg

Felekezetek

Navigation menu

Search