User talk:Plupp
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:55, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Plupp. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Plupp~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
22:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Liebhardt 2009.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Liebhardt 2009.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Liebhardt 2009.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:17, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Deutsche Kirche in Atmagea.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Otto Klett 1971.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Otto Klett 1971.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Otto Klett 1971.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Kirche und Gutshof Alberstedt
[edit]Hallo, ich habe mal eine Frage: Du hast zwei Bilder von der Kirche Alberstedt hochgeladen, die beide mit "22. März 2021" datiert sind. Ist das das Upload-Datum? Mir ist nämlich gerade bei Google Earth aufgefallen, dass der westlich benachbarte Gutshof abgerissen wurde und auf Deinem Bild Kirche St. Peter und Paulus Nord sieht man den noch rechts der Kirche, auf Deinem Bild Kirche St. Peter und Paulus Süd (dort links der Kirche) hingegen nicht mehr. Mich interessiert das nur, weil ich gern rausbekommen würde, wann der ungefähr abgerissen wurde. Ich habe den Gutshof (und die Kirche) 2012 fotografiert und das Bild von Jwaller von 2014 zeigt ihn auch noch.--Martin Beitz (talk) 11:23, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Das Datum stimmt, steht sowohl in den Dateidaten so drin als auch bei den GPS Metadaten:
GPS Date/Time : 2021:03:22 13:17:20
- sollte also stimmen. Das Google so aktuelle Bilder hat ist schon erstaunlich. Plupp (talk) 12:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nochmal, beide Bilder stammen vom angegebenen Datum. Wie ich das sehe, ist sowohl auf Google als auch Bing das Gebäude, welches auf der Ansicht von nord zu sehen ist, noch vorhanden. Ich denke, es liegt ausserhalb das ehem. Gutshofes, genau südwestlich der Kirche. Plupp (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Danke für die schnelle Antwort. Vielleicht hat man dann eines der Gebäude stehen lassen. Ich werde mir das demnächst mal selbst angucken und es dann mit meinen alten Bildern vergleichen.--Martin Beitz (talk) 10:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Biserica Sfântul Anton de Padova.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Biserica Sfântul Anton de Padova.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Biserica Sfântul Anton de Padova.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Sinti-Mausoleum Osendorf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Dumitru Crudu in Berlin Juni 2023.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Biserica Sfântul Anton de Padova 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dieses Foto ist meine eigene Arbeit. User Plupp == Heinz-Jürgen Oertel als real name Plupp (talk) 21:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Iulian Ciocan in Berlin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Sinti-Mausoleum Osendorf.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Sinti-Mausoleum Osendorf.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Sinti-Mausoleum Osendorf.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |