User talk:PercevalBxl
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
FrancoGG ( talk ) 23:35, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Bl-emaux-or.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Bl-emaux-or.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. FrancoGG ( talk ) 23:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Orgullomoore 08:12, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --
Image Tagging Image:Pieces-pointebande.svg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Pieces-pointebande.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Yonatan talk 08:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Pieces-pile.svg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Pieces-pile.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Yonatan talk 08:39, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Orgullomoore 02:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Salut,
Juste pour dire que par définition le burelé est de dix, dont c'est pas nécessaire d'ajouter ce détail à un blasonement. Je vais quand même laisser ton ajout puisque çe n'est pas faut non plus.--Caranorn 12:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Je viens juste de jeter un coup d'oeil sur tes très beaux blasons. Tu devrais peut être entrer en contact avec le Projet Blason de wikipedia francophone. La raison est que Min's vient d'aussi créer un fichier SVG du blason de Charleroi et probablement de certains autres fichiers. Dont il y a double emploi et vous pourriez peut être vous coordiner. Et tu peux biensur remplacer tous mes png, ou les nominer pour suppression (je ne travaille pas en SVG, ou pas encore, et je ne peux pas publier mes png plus récents).
- Note je viens de réaliser que tu es déjà en contact avec le projet blason. Je recommanderais quand même une coordination, il ne sert à rien de faire le même travail deux fois. J'ai aussi laissé une note pour Min's avec lequel tu es déjà en contact.--Caranorn 12:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Tu as mille fois raison ! Mea culpa. J'ai d'autant plus honte que j'insiste généralement très fort pour le respect de ce genre de règle. J'ai donc corrigé ma correction ! :) Pour ma défense, je dirai que je venais de passer près de dix-huit heures d'affilée devant mon écran et que je ne n'avais plus les yeux en face des trous... On fait (et on dit) parfois de fameuses bêtises quand on est fatigué.
- Quoi qu'il en soit, je te remercie pour ton avis sur mes blasons. J'aime beaucoup les tiens et je ne me permettrai pas de les remplacer parce que ce n'est pas le but de ma démarche... Pour le moment, il s'agit surtout de compléter un projet de traité du blasonnement qui soit plus complet et plus "correct" que celui du portail héraldique. Et aussi de tenter un véritable armorial exhaustif des communes de Belgique. J'ai, en effet, la possibilité d'obtenir auprès des administrations communales les blasons exacts, y compris des anciennes communes des nouvelles entités ; ça devrait permettre de "boucher" les nombreux trous...
- Pour ce qui est de la coordination, j'espère qu'elle viendra bientôt et, surtout, j'attend les remarques, suggestions et critiques sur l'article "règles du blasonnement" que je prépare. Cela dit, il n'y a pas vraiment de double emploi des blasons, dans la mesure où ils n'ont pas la même "présentation". J'ai simplement voulu que les miens soient plus "formattés" en fonction des règles précises de l'héraldique (mes écus, par exemple, sont "aux normes"...). Ils ne sont pas meilleurs, loin de là, mais, dès que j'aurai complété mon article, toutes les partitions et les pièces seront disponibles en format svg et dans les proportions "correctes" 7/8, ce qui, je l'espère, servira à tous.
- N.B. Mes lions ont la queue mal orientée, je vais devoir les redessiner ! ;)
- Cordialement, PercevalBxl 19:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Juste pour note, la forme de l'écu peut varier énormément donc la proportion 7/8 n'est pas nécessaire, bien qu'effectivement le type d'écu que tu utilise est beaucoup plus adapté aux armes écartelées ou encore plus complexes. Normalement je ne m'occupe que d'armoiries médiévales, c'est là raison pour laquelle j'avais adopté l'écu arrondi et coupé. Depuis j'ai opté pour une variante toujours arrondie mais sans avoir découpé le chef, mais c'est un vrai casse tête pour adapter certaines armoiries dépassant le début du 14ème siècle.
- Pour les sources c'est très bien si tu peux avoir les blasonnements et exemples directement des sources. J'avais commencé avec uniquement une copie de l'armorial de Max Servais en ignorance que beaucoup d'armes avaient changées avec les reformes des années 70. Malheureusement la bibliothèque nationale ici au Luxembourg n'a pas de copie des deux armoriaux publiés par la banque Dexia dans les années 90.--Caranorn 11:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- La forme de l'écu n'est effectivement pas "fixée" et l'artiste héraldiste est tout à fait libre de l'adapter à son inspiration. cependant, au risque de paraître puriste ou tétracapillotomiste, je noterai que l'écu "en accolade" ou "français moderne" est un peu moins libre que les autres, dans la mesure où, daté des XVIIIème-XIXème siècles, il a été adopté d'emblée dans ces proportions et qu'aucune autorité héraldique française n'a pu le modifier depuis... je le répète, c'est couper les cheveux en quatre, mais l'héraldique n'est-celle pas, précisément, du coupage de cheveux en quatre ?
- Pour ce qui est des armoriaux publiés par Dexia, ils s'arrêtent en 1990 et ne tiennent pas compte des modifications ultérieures de toute façon... il n'y a donc qu'une seule source fiable : les communes elles-mêmes. Je tâcherai de mettre les blasonnements en ligne à mesure que je les recevrai.
- Mes contacts étant valables au Luxembourg aussi, si tu en as besoin, n'hésite pas à me faire signe...
- Cordialement, PercevalBxl 12:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Orgullomoore 16:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --
Image Tagging Image:YadBlasons-echiquette-5tires.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:YadBlasons-echiquette-5tires.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Adambro 21:50, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Coats of arms of the county of Hainaut.svg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Coats of arms of the county of Hainaut.svg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Coats of arms of the county of Hainaut.svg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |