User talk:Michael.Kramer
Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f3/LUSITANA_WLM_2011_d.svg/150px-LUSITANA_WLM_2011_d.svg.png)
Hallo Mich.kramer,
nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.
Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.
Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.
Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.
( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)
Wiki Loves Earth 2017
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f4/WLE_Austria_Logo.svg/150px-WLE_Austria_Logo.svg.png)
Hallo Michael.Kramer,
bald startet wieder Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland, unser Fotowettbewerb rund um das Themengebiet Naturschutz. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du wieder mitmachst.
Bilder können vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2017 eingereicht werden.
WLE Deutschland kooperiert dieses Jahr mit der Deutschen UNESCO-Kommission (DUK). Die bestplatzierten Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten, Weltnaturerbe und UNESCO-Geoparks sollen auf http://www.unesco.de präsentiert werden.
Die allgemeinen Wünsche der Organisatoren haben sich nicht geändert: Schutzgebiet oder -objekt angeben, Originalauflösung, keine Signaturen oder ähnliches im Bild.
Die Suche nach geeigneten Motiven erleichtern unter anderem neue Listen aller deutschen Naturwaldreservate oder Listen der Naturdenkmale in Baden-Württemberg, im Saarland, Hessen und Brandenburg. Stöbere einfach mal bei Wikipedia, z. B. auf der Karte.
Eine Vorjury wird die Vorauswahl der Bilder übernehmen. Hier kannst Du Dich ebenfalls gerne beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.
Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,
File:Melanochromis auratus femelle dominante.jpg
[edit]Back in 2015 you renamed File:Lake Malawi cichlid.jpg to File:Melanochromis auratus femelle dominante.jpg. Was it misidentified by the original Flickr photographer? Brightgalrs (talk) 13:18, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Earth 2018
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f4/WLE_Austria_Logo.svg/150px-WLE_Austria_Logo.svg.png)
Hallo Michael.Kramer,
vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2018 können beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland wieder Landschafts- und Naturfotos eingereicht werden. Sie sollen in Schutzgebieten aufgenommen worden sein. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch dieses Jahr mitmachst.
Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen, als Einstiegsseite kann diese Karte dienen.
Als ehemaliger Teilnehmer kannst Du bis Ende April bei der Wahl der Jury abstimmen.
Da viele tausend Bilder zu bewerten sind, wird die sogenannte Vorjury ab Anfang Mai eine Vorauswahl der eingereichten Bilder übernehmen. Deine Beteiligung daran ist ausdrücklich erwünscht. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt dann per E-Mail.
Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,
File tagging File:H2 Mobility Tankkarte.pdf
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:H2 Mobility Tankkarte.pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:H2 Mobility Tankkarte.pdf]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
- Hey Krd, Mail ist raus. Oder kann ich da einfach was ändern? cu --Michael (talk) 11:08, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Es wird die Freigabe duch den Rechteinhaber an dem Werk benötigt. Liegt Dir die vor? --Krd 16:46, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Dateiumbenennungen
[edit]Schau doch bitte einmal in den folgenden Thread: Commons:Forum#Policies (Verschieberegeln) und schau dir nochmal die Verschieberegeln an, insbesondere natürlich die hier bemühte Regel 5. Danke! Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:45, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Your best shot 2018
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
I'm wishing you all the best for the New Year and I hope you're going to have many memorable photo opportunities in 2019. With 2018 coming to an end, it's time to look back at the past 12 months. I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2018 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:
Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!
Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:44, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Polestar 2 002.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Polestar 2 002.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
MB-one (talk) 10:51, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Polestar 2 004.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Polestar 2 004.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
MB-one (talk) 10:51, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Polestar 2 013.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Polestar 2 013.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Polestar 2 013.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
MB-one (talk) 10:53, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Polestar 2 016.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Polestar 2 016.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Polestar 2 016.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
MB-one (talk) 10:54, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Photo walk in Stockholm
[edit]It's only a few weeks until Wikimania 2019 in Sweden. I'd like to invite you to the Commons Photographer's photo walk. If you're planning on going to Stockholm in August, please consider joining this event. This is an opportunity to connect with other photographers, have fun together, and explore the beauty of an iconic Scandinavian city… All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Die neue Tankkarte H2.LIVE-CARD.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Die neue Tankkarte H2.LIVE-CARD.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Quedel (talk) 18:04, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6a/Commons_File_mover.svg/75px-Commons_File_mover.svg.png)
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Your best shot 2019
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
It's early 2020, which means it's time again to look back at photographs taken over the course of the past 12 months. As always, I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2019 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:
Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!
All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Der blaue Harry Hase.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
DiegoAma (talk) 02:54, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Verschiebung von File:Europe laea location map with borders.svg
[edit]Moin! Wieso war der alte Name meaningless or ambiguous name? NNW 13:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
- Die Begründung mag etwas doof sein aber der neue Name erschien mir nicht schlechter als der Alte. Möchtest du das zurückdrehen? dann bitte einfach umbenennen und ich schiebe das durch. --Michael (talk) 13:42, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello
You recently turned down my request to rename the file [[[1]]. purporting to be of Dr James Barry. I apologise if I went about this the wrong way, but it has come to my attention that this picture has been misidentified, as illustrated here [2] and here [3]. It is not in fact of Dr James Barry, but of a Mr Joseph Barry, a South African businessman. The image has been removed from the English Wikipedia article for Dr James Barry (surgeon) [[4]] for that reason. I was attempting to rename it so that the mistake could also be rectified at other Wikipedia pages. I would also like to include this image at the article for Swellendum [[5]] as an image of an influential person in the development of that town. Would you be able to assist me in having the image correctly named? Autumnking2012 (talk) 17:01, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Done. Gruß, --Achim (talk) 20:00, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:11-09-fotofluege-cux-allg-04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 08:24, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Michael, ich spar mir mal einen eigenen Thread. obwohl es um die umbenannte Datei Hubschrauber Bell 407 auf dem Flugplatz Borkum, 2011.jpg geht:
- Mit meiner Nebenbemerkung in Special:Diff/404621367/404639780 meinte ich nicht, dass die Dateiumbenennung als solche fehlerhaft gewesen wäre, sondern, dass man aufpassen solle, ein mögliches Dateischema nicht zu zerstören; in COM:FR steht das (leider nur) im Vortext des ersten Abschnitts. Konkret wäre sicherlich ein Name wie
File:11-09-fotofluege-cux-allg-04 - Hubschrauber Bell 407 auf dem Flugplatz Borkum, 2011.jpg
angebracht gewesen – man hätte das Schema erhalten und die Mehrdeutigkeit aufgelöst. Dass Ralf auch das nicht mag, ist dann ein anderes Problem, wo ich nicht seiner Meinung bin. Man muss nur verstehen, dass sich da zuletzt etwas aufgeschaukelt hat zwischen diesem anderen Nutzer und ihm. — Speravir – 17:37, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo Speravir, alles gut. dass die Umbennenung außer Frage steht ist kein Ding. Okay, man hätte vielleicht auch auf einen vorhandenen Namen Bezug nehmen können, wenn der tatsächlicht erkennbar gewesen wäre. Und ich denke jetzt nur an die Flüge über das Sauerland. Alle Bilder wurden umbenannte aber ich kann noch immer jedes Bild identifizieren weil ein kleiner Baustein erhalten geblieben ist. Das Problem ist, dass es Mitarbeiter gibt die es weder links noch rechts rum interessiert und beleidigt reagieren wenn es nicht nach ihren eigenen speziellen Vorstellungen geht. Man hat das Prinzip Wiki 2.0 nicht verstanden. Jedem das seine. Ich kenne Ralf persönlich und habe meine eigene Meinung. Aufgeschaukelt halt Ralf das Thema aus verletztem Ego. Mit Verständnis und Umsicht hätte das sehr friedlich geregelt werden können, nicht nur Ralf aber eben auch. Die Wikipedia hat zu viele massive Egos. --Michael (talk) 17:44, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Das Thema regt Ralf schon viel länger auf, soweit ich das in Commons:Forum immer mitbekomme. Jetzt ist wohl ein Fass übergelaufen. Dass normalerweise der alte Name als Weiterleitung erhalten bleibt, darauf habe ich ihn schon hingewiesen. Da ist dann sogar ein Verhalten wie bei der Datei, um die es hier geht, kontraproduktiv (und leider auch das neue Recht, als Dateiverschieber die Weiterleitung zu unterdrücken, so dass man auf den Verstand des Verschiebers angewiesen ist). — Speravir – 18:04, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Klares Nein. Es geht auch um das Bewusstseins des Uploaders Ralf einen vernüftigen Namen zu hinterlegen. Namen ohne vernünftigen Bezug laden ein um einen deutlichen Bezug zum Bild über den Namen herbei zu führen. Eine harmonische Benamsung ist dabei irrelevant wenn nicht deutlich nachvollziehbar. Und in dem bestehenden Namen ist eine einfache Nummerierung keine einheitliche Benamsung der Bilder sonder willkürliche Reihenfolge. Die Dateiverschiebung war gut und richtig. Es fehlt dem Uploader am Verständnis einen Namen mit Bezug zum Bild herzustellen. Mit solchen Bildnamen lädt man nur ein das massiv und ohne virtuelles Verständnis für die bisherigen Namen neu zu benennen. Die Verantwortung für solche Aktionen liegt deutlich beim Uploader. Da ich auch einige mehr Bilder hochgeladen habe weiß ich wovon ich spreche. Und nach den Sauerlandflugaktionen ist das nur sehr deutlich. Ralf sollte mal erwachsen werden und sich bewusst so verhalten statt nur irgendwelche verrückten Namen zu vergeben die nicht das Bild erklären.--Michael (talk) 19:27, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Das Thema regt Ralf schon viel länger auf, soweit ich das in Commons:Forum immer mitbekomme. Jetzt ist wohl ein Fass übergelaufen. Dass normalerweise der alte Name als Weiterleitung erhalten bleibt, darauf habe ich ihn schon hingewiesen. Da ist dann sogar ein Verhalten wie bei der Datei, um die es hier geht, kontraproduktiv (und leider auch das neue Recht, als Dateiverschieber die Weiterleitung zu unterdrücken, so dass man auf den Verstand des Verschiebers angewiesen ist). — Speravir – 18:04, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Hey Speravir, ein neuer Antrag auf den alten Namen zu verschieben ist sowas von ignorant jeder Diskussion und zeugt von einem persönlichem Ego statt von einer einvernehmlichen Lösung des Problems. Der Antrag wurde schon mehrfach abgelehnt aber wird nochmals gestellt? In der Wikipedia wäre das Vandalismus. Wenn Ralf noch nicht verstanden hat wie hier der Hase läuft sollte er sich eine andere Plattform für seine Bilder suchen. Hier gelten die Regeln von commons und die erlauben solche Umbenennungen ausdrücklich. Die erlauben eine solche Rückbenennung ausdrücklich nicht. Sorry, wenn wir mit commmons Wikipedia unterstützen gehört hier etwas mehr Geist dazu. --Michael (talk) 17:22, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Ja. Ein Teil des Problems ist ja, dass er der Meinung ist, dass seine Bilder nicht mehrdeutig sind – oder nicht schlimmer als andere Dateien, die nicht umbenannt werden. Nein, falsch formuliert: Obwohl der Dateiname nur eine sehr allgemeine Angabe macht, ist das auscreichend, weil es die Dateibeschreibung gibt, und wenn seine Dateien umbenannt werden, dann müssten noch viel andere Dateien umbenannt werden. Unabhängig davon scheint dieser russische Nutzer ihn wohl wirklich als Opfer auserkoren zu haben. Und weil Smial Ralf zur Seite sprang, wurde er von diesem gleich auch noch als Userproblem gemeldet. Das ist doch auch nicht korrekt. — Speravir – 18:09, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Da ich erst jetzt auf diese Disk stieß: Ich bin Ralf nicht zur Seite gesprungen, sondern meine Absicht war, mich allgemein gegen solche willkürlichen und bezüglich Benutzerschemata zerstörend wirkende Dateiverschiebungen zu wenden, da ich in der Vergangenheit ebenfalls mehrmals von solchen Aktionen betroffen war. Ich ahnte ja nicht, daß ich sogleich diesen Troll an den Hacken haben würde... Ich unterstütze Ralfs sehr pauschale Dateibenamsung ausdrücklich nicht, habe ihn darauf auch schon mal hingewiesen. --Smial (talk) 17:13, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- … schrieb ich, denn ich hatte noch gar nicht bemerkt, dass nun noch ein dritter unter ihm leiden musste und seinerseits ein Userproblem meldete. — Speravir – 18:19, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Hey Speravir, du hast das Bild in den alten Namen verschoben. Was willst du? Mach es rückgänig oder bring es in einen Namen der allen entspricht. Hier wird commons gerade vorgeführt und zeugt von Unfähigkeit und persönlichem Ego verschiedener Personen. Mein Anteil ist es Bilder für Artikel zu liefern. Bilder wie das hier sind für die Wikipedia unwichtig. Mit solchen Namen, die commons nicht entsprechen, gehören sie umbenannt oder gelöscht. Mir als aktiver Fotograf für die Wikipedia ist solch egozentrisches Verhalten ein Graus. Damit werden wir für Wikipedia oder commons keine weiteren Teilnehmer gewinnen können. Frage: was will jeder für sich und die Community? --Michael (talk) 19:10, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Nein, du irrst. Der alte Name ist hier oben im Titel verlinkt. — Speravir – 19:12, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Sorry Speravir, dass der alte Name oben steht ist keine Frage. Die Frag ist, ob deine Verschiebung auf diesen Namen der Diskussion gerecht wird und nicht ein neuer Name unter allen Betrachtungen besser gewesen wäre, spricht: die Verschiebung ablehnen und einen neuen Namen vergeben der beiden Perspektiven gerecht wird. Hier hast du die Diskussion auch vollständig ignoriert. Und jetzt bitte wieder in der Diskussion um das Bild und nicht bei mir. Hier ist die Diskussion fehlt am Platz und das möchtest du doch nicht oder? Wenn dann für alle. Danke und schlusss. --Michael (talk) 19:40, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Eine hoffentlich letzte Anmerkung: Ja, womöglich wäre es besser gewesen, die Umbenennung nicht durchzuführen (also, dass ich das tat – das ist mir kurz danach sogar selber in den Sinn gekommen), aber sie tauchte normal in der Liste der Anfragen auf, die ich gerade durchging, und Ralfs Wunsch, das Dateinamensschema im Namen zu haben, ist legitim. Übrigens habe ich Ralfs Wunsch gar nicht exakt entsprochen, denn das wäre genau der alte Name gewesen. — Speravir – 22:40, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Hey Speravir, das während der laufenden Diskussion zu tun war sehr unglücklich. Und es wäre doch ein leichtes gewesen danach das Bild diskussionskonform zu benennen? Aber gut, ich werde alle Bilder die auftauchen weiter umbenennen wie du es getan hast ohne Vorwürfe. Nur ist damit die Diskussion ad absurdum geführt, wie so viele hier. Zu viele Leute haben zu viel Zeit.--Michael (talk) 05:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello. If you think this complies with the rules, please rename this file to File:Kontaktflächen eines Prozessors in LGA 775.jpg. — Ирука13 06:09, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
07W track file name
[edit]Just to note that I will be reverting your edit to changing the file name of [Heling 1994 track.png] because I have found out that they were not the same system. Thanks. -- Typhoon2013 04:09, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- This is to the same as 1993's Indang. -- Typhoon2013 (talk) 05:18, 15 April 2020 UTC)
Revert renaming
[edit]Hi Michael, in the Gartenlaube project we have a clear naming pattern for our thousands of pages and contained images, see https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Die_Gartenlaube#Bilder. Please do not break it and revert the renaming of File:Die Gartenlaube (1869) b 509; Arab University in Cairo, Egypt.jpg. Thanks in advance, --Arnd (talk) 05:58, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Commons Photographers User Group: Meeting on May 30, 2020
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
I’d like to invite you to our group’s first Virtual Meeting on Saturday, May 30, 2020. The meeting will serve as an opportunity to get to know each other better, share learnings, and connect in times of the global COVID-19 pandemic.
Please take a look at the meeting page and add your name to the list of participants if you’re planning to attend.
Hope to see you in a week! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:53, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Commons Photographers User Group: Meeting on September 26 and other stuff
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
I've got a quick update for you, containing three items:
- I’d like to invite you to our group’s second Virtual Meeting on Saturday, September 26, 2020. As last time, this meeting will serve as an opportunity to get to know each other better, share learnings, and connect in times of the global COVID-19 pandemic. If you'd like to present, please add your name and the proposed topic to the list on the talk page.
- Also, I'd like to start a conversation about how we should be sharing responsibility for the user group going forward. I'd love to get some help when it comes to organizing things and I'm convinced that we can achieve more if a couple of people helped with coordinating stuff.
- Finally, the Wikimedia Foundation has asked me to spread the word about their latest survey: Universal Code of Conduct Survey. The goal is to create a safer environment on Wikimedia projects and the Foundation gathers feedback prior to coming up with a first draft.
Hope to see you at the Zoom meeting in September!
All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:55, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2020
[edit]Hallo Michael.Kramer,
bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!
Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.
Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.
Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.
Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.
Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Reminder: User Group Meeting this Saturday
[edit]Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,
This is a quick reminder that our second virtual meeting will take place this Saturday, September 26. The agenda entails presentations about drone photography, about the story behind a featured picture, and about the future of LRMediaWiki. We'll also discuss photographers’ contacts with the Wikimedia Foundation and the election of representatives for our user group. You'll find information about all of this on the event page:
I'm also inviting you to share some information about yourself and your photography work with other members of the user group on our new membership list:
I hope you're well during these difficult times. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Reminder about file renaming
[edit]Per COM:FRNOT #4, file renaming requests for files with copyright issues should be declined. This includes files with no license template, like File:Les Nombre XXX.png. I also do not see how COM:FNC#6 applies to that file, but that isn't a problem as criterion 1 applies. Thanks, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Commons Photographers User Group meeting on Saturday
[edit]Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,
I'd like to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, December 12. We'll have two presentations: Habib Mhenni aka Dyolf77 will answer the question Do "we" need DSLRs anymore? and Martin Falbisoner will walk us through the making of his featured picture File:Caribbean_Sea_-_Long_Exposure.jpg.
If you can make it, please add your name to the list of attendees to this page:
I hope to see you in three days. Also, I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2021. Your contributions to Commons make a big difference.
Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:16, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Your most memorable shot 2020
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
Over the course of the past two years, we've been sharing pictures that have a special meaning with each other at the start of the new year. Today, I'm inviting you add your most memorable shot of 2020 to this page:
I hope you, your familiy, and your friends are well during these difficult times. I wish you all the best for 2021 and I can't wait to see what your most memorable shot of 2020 looks like.
Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:45, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Next Commons Photographers meeting featuring large format photographer Ben Horne
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
I'm happy to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, March 20, at the usual time. As I mentioned during our last get-together, I'd like to invite external guests every now and then, given that it seems good to expand our view and learn something from someone outside our community.
Our first external guest, Ben Horne, will talk about large format wilderness photography, followed by a question-and-answer session. Ben is maybe one of best known contemporary large format photographers in the United States. On his excursions to national parks, he shoots 8×10 film and talks about his adventures on his YouTube channel which has attracted more than 48,000 followers so far. He is YouTube's first, and longest active landscape photography vlogger and I'm thrilled that he has agreed to join our next meeting and talk about his experiences.
If you're interested in joining this meeting, please sign up on the page below:
Also, don't forget to post your question(s) prior to the meeting on the following page in order to ensure a good and fruitful question-and-answer session:
I'm very much looking forward to this event and I hope you'll be able to join.
All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Reminder: Commons Photographers meeting tomorrow
[edit]Just a quick reminder: the meeting with large format-photographer Ben Horne will happen tomorrow, Saturday, March 20. If you haven't done yet, please consider signing up for the event and add your questions to this page. This will be our first virtual meeting in 2021 and I'd be super happy if you could join. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:China Construction Bank Luxemburg 8452-153 China Construction Bank.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Commons Photographers meeting on October 30th
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
I'm happy to invite you to our next virtual meeting next Saturday, October 30. This time, our colleagues User:Dey.sandip from India and User:Ermell from Germany will talk about their work.
If you're interested in joining this meeting, please sign up on the page below:
I'm very much looking forward to this event and I hope you'll be able to join.
All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:48, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Commons Photographers User Group: first board election
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
In preparation of the first board election of our group, I invite you to take a look at the following page:
and provide feedback. I've listed a number of positions for our first board and I've also outlined a possible timeline for the elections. The current plan is to open the self-nomination process up on November 15 and then have the election start on December 1.
I'm super excited to get this going and I'm very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.
I hope you're safe and well, and I wish you all the best! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Commons Photographers elections: self-nomination phase is open
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
The self-nomination phase for the first board election of our group is open as of today. If you'd like to take on a more active role and take our user group to the next level, please consider running for one of the open positions. Please check out the Board Election 2021 page for more details.
I hope you, your family, and your friends are doing well. All the best! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Board election: voting is open!
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
The voting phase for our group's board election starts today. Please consider casting your vote. Voting ends on December 17.
I wish you all the best for the rest of the year 2021. Stay safe and healthy! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Your most memorable shot of 2021
[edit]Happy New Year! As always at the beginning of the new year, I'm inviting you to share your most memorable shot of the past year. Which of your photos stood out in 2021? Which image created special memories that you'd like to share with others? On behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2022. Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Save the date: Commons Photographers meeting next week
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
Please save the date: on Saturday, June 19th, our next virtual Zoom meeting is going to take place. As you know, one goal of these meetings is to share knowledge about different types of photography. This time, we've lined up the following presentations:
- Photography in Nigeria
- Photographing vehicles
- I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…
If you'd like to participate in this event, please consider signing up on this page. Also, if you'd like to present at one of the next meetings, please send me a quick note. Sharing your experiences and learnings with others can make a huge difference!
I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best! Hope to see you on the 19th.
Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
This Sunday!
[edit]Hi, this is just a quick reminder: the next virtual meeting of our user group is scheduled for Sunday, June 19, 16:00 UTC. Topics are: “Photography in Nigeria”, “Photographing Vehicles”, “Wildlife photography and citizen science”, and “I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…”. I'm thrilled about this great agenda and I'm looking forward to connecting with you again. Stay safe and all the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Quick update on behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
I hope you're well and enjoy taking photos for Wikimedia Commons. Here are a couple of quick updates on behalf of our group:
- Our next virtual meeting will take place on Saturday, August 27. At this point we have two presentations lined up:
- Suitable! Unsuitable! How to choose photos for a Wikipedia for children, “Klexikon” (Ziko)
- The aperture and its (less known) effects (XRay)
- You can sign up for the event on this page: Virtual Meeting on August 27, 2022. – Given that we can accommodate more speakers, I'll invite you to get in touch with me in case you'd like to present on the 27th. You can reach me any time on my talk page or by sending a quick email.
- Also, we now have a page for local events organized by members of our user group: Local events 2022. Please check it out and consider organizing an event yourself!
- And finally, we're planning on offering a Post-processing Workshop on October 8. Please save the date; an events page with more information will go up later.
Thanks for being a member of our group and for sharing your works under a free license. Have fun taking pictures!
All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
You're invited to provide input…
[edit]Dear fellow member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
At our last meeting end of August, we talked about getting in touch with the Wikimedia Foundation and offering our help for improving Wikimedia Commons. Today, I invite you to provide your input on a draft open letter to the Foundation. Over the course of the next ten days, we'll further improve the text together, before inviting people to sign it. If you're interested in providing input, please engage in the discussion on the talk page of the draft.
In the meanwhile, I hope you're well and have a great time taking photos! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 08:42, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Online workshop this weekend
[edit]Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,
This coming Saturday, October 8, we'll host an online post processing workshop. On behalf of our events coordinator Shreya I invite you to sign up for the event using this Google form.
I hope you're well. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Question from the CPUG Board
[edit]Dear user group member,
I'm writing you to today on behalf of the board of the Commons Photographers User Group. The past year has been a busy one for us. In 2022, we've had more activities than ever before in the history of our group and you'll find an overview on our group's page.
With that being said, 2022 was also a year of learning for the current board members. Most of us hadn't been involved in running the Photographers User Group and we spent quite some time on getting used to our new roles. We all feel it was a steep learning curve.
That's why, at our last board meeting, we decided to ask our members whether they'd be ok with us serving for another year. Extending our board duties to the end of 2023 would allow us to continue the work we've started this year, and to benefit from the knowledge we've built over the past twelve months.
However, in the end, it's up to you and the other members of our group to decide whether such an extension of our board term should be granted. I invite you to voice your opinion on this page:
Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2022
We'll gather feedback until December 27, and we'll keep you in the loop about the outcomes of this process.
Thanks so much for your ongoing support of our group. I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best.
--Ailura (talk) 12:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Most memorable shot 2022 / Wikimania 2023
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
I wish you a Happy New Year! As it has been our tradition at the beginning of the new year for a while, we're sharing our most memorable shots of the past year with each other. I invite you to share a picture that is particular meaningful to you and to describe why that's the case. Also, as Wikimania 2023 will be here before we know it (August 16 to 19), please consider adding your thoughts on our planning page, where we gather ideas for how we can make Commons photography more visible than in the years before.
All the best to you, your family, and friends! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Stamp GDR 1963 Michel 1129.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: CSD G2 (Unused and implausible, or broken redirect))
Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Meno25.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 18:51, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on August 5
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, August 5th. We'll have two speakers: Poco a poco will provide us with an update on his underwater photography and George Oates from the Flickr Foundation will talk about the Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) that is currently in the works. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on August 5, 2023.
I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you on August 5th.
All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Quick reminder: Commons Photographers meeting this Saturday
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
This is a quick reminder that our next meeting will happen on Saturday, August 5th. If you haven't registered yet and you're interested in learning more about underwater photography and “Flickypedia”, please sign up on this page. Also, I invite you to fill out this survey created by the people who are working on the Flickr-to-Wikimedia Commons software. Your input will make a difference.
We haven't had a virtual meeting in a while and I'm so looking forward to this weekend!
All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
in preparation of the 2023 board election of our group, we invite you to take a look at the following page:
Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2023
and provide feedback.
The timeline for the 2023 election will be
- September 15 – September 30: Applications for the election committee
- October 1 – October 9: Vote for election committee (ideally comprised of three members)
- October 10: Election committee starts work
- October 20 – November 9: Nomination phase for candidacies
- November 10 – December 10: Elections
- December 15: Results announced
In the first step we ask you to be part of the election committe. Please add your name on the Election Page.
We are very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.
All the best
--Ailura (talk) for the CPUG board
WikiCon Photowalk der CPUG in Linz
[edit]Hallo Michael.Kramer,
die Commons Photographers User Group lädt alle Gruppenmitglieder und weitere Interessierte, die an der WikiCon in Linz teilnehmen, zu einem Photowalk ein. Wir treffen uns am Freitag, 29. September um 14:15 Uhr bei der Anmeldung im Wissensturm und werden rechtzeitig zur Kaffeepause um 15:45 Uhr zurück sein.
Viele Grüße --Ailura (talk) 14:56, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023 - Nomination Phase
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
the 2023 board election of our group is run at
Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2023.
The next steps in the timeline for the 2023 election are
- October 20 – November 16: Nomination phase for candidacies
- November 17 – December 10: Elections
- December 16: Results announced
If you are interested in being a member of the board, please nominate yourself on the Election Page.
We are very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.
All the best
--Ailura (talk) for the CPUG board
![]() |
File:62751338058089.Y3JvcCw0ODAsMzc1LDE2LDY1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 09:42, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Flickypedia soft launch and a huge thank you
[edit]Dear fellow Commons photographer,
I hope this message finds you well. As you might already know, the Flickr Foundation has been busy creating a new Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) this year. After a successful demo at the GLAM Wiki Conference in Montevideo, the Flickr Foundation team is now inviting all members of the Commons Photographers User Group to be the first to review their alpha, reporting any technical issues or other feedback via the Flickypedia project talk page.
At the same time, this message is an opportunity for me to thank you for your trust and support over the past couple of years. Since 2017, we've grown into being one of the largest user groups in the Wikimedia universe. I've tremendously enjoyed interacting with all of our members when it came to joint photowalks at Wikimanias, virtual Zoom meetings where we covered a wide variety of photography topics, as well as our annual “Most memorable shot of the year”, among many other events. As I'm not running for an official position in our current board election, this will be my last message on behalf of the user group to you. Thanks for all the happy moments we shared together over the years! I hope you'll continue creating free images for the millions of people we serve through Wikipedia and Commons.
All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deadline Approaching for Most Memorable Shot Submission!
[edit]Hello Michael.Kramer !,
![Camera1 mgx](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1d/Camera1_mgx.svg/100px-Camera1_mgx.svg.png)
![Commons-Photographers User Group-logo-en](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f1/Commons-Photographers_User_Group-logo-en.svg/110px-Commons-Photographers_User_Group-logo-en.svg.png)
Just a quick reminder that the deadline for submitting your most memorable shot of 2023 is swiftly approaching! As tradition holds, since 2018, we've been sharing our favorite captures from the past year with each other. This year marks the sixth iteration of our beloved "Most Memorable Shot" tradition, and we're excited to see what everyone has to share.
Whether you're a member of the Commons Photographers User Group or not, you're warmly invited to participate. Your unique perspective adds to the richness of our community, and we'd love to see the world through your lens.
So, if you haven't already, take a moment to pick out your most cherished picture of 2023 and share it with us on the designated page. The deadline is February 29th, so don't let time slip away!
Let's keep this wonderful tradition alive and celebrate the beauty and diversity of our collective experiences through photography.
Looking forward to seeing your memorable shots!
Best regards,
Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on April 13, 2024
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, April 13, 2024 at 9.00 UTC ( start time in your timezone (via zoneStamp!) (expected duration for 2 hrs). The primary agenda of this gathering will revolve around discussions regarding the Movement Charter. Your valuable input and participation in these discussions would be highly appreciated. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on April 13, 2024.
I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you.
All the best, -- Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
[edit]- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,