User talk:Melromero
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Yann 18:47, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Ncerrazuriz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Frumpy 19:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Borrado
[edit]Efectivamente, esas entidades son poseedoras de los derechos de autor, por lo tanto las imágenes tienen copyright y el hecho de que el gobierno las divulgue públicamente para conocimiento de sus ciudadanos no significa que sean aptas para Commons, donde se exige que sean libres para su redistribución, modificación e incluso uso comercial. Lee Commons:Sobre las licencias. Anna 03:40, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- No cumple los requisitos de Commons, según esta cita:
- "se permite, sin la necesidad de remunerar o de obtener la autorizacion del autor, la reproduccion en obras de caracter cultural, cientifico o didactico, de fragmentos de los trabajos protegidos de otros autores, siempre y cuando su fuente, titulo y autor sean mencionados."
La reproducción para obras de carácter cultural, científico o didáctico se considera fair use (uso legítimo) y esta licencia no está permitida aquí. Lee Commons:Sobre las licencias#No se acepta material bajo el supuesto de uso legítimo Anna 04:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Pinochet
[edit]Si la imagen está en dominio público, lo que dudo, puede ser subida aqui en Commons y borrada en en.wiki. Si la imagen no está en domínio público, no hay fair use rationale porque hay (varias) otras imágenes de Pinochet disponibles aqui. Dantadd✉ 12:06, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Esto se esta convirtiendo en una broma. Si tanto dudas te refiero a la Ley 17.336 (de 28 de agosto de 1970): Art. 88 (El Estado, los Municipios, las Corporaciones oficiales, las Instituciones semifiscales o autónomas y las demás personas jurídicas estatales serán titulares del derecho de autor respecto de las obras producidas por sus funcionarios en el desempeño de sus cargos); Art. 11 (Pertenecen al patrimonio cultural común: (e) Las obras que fueren expropiadas por el Estado, salvo que la ley especifique un beneficiario. Las obras del patrimonio cultural común podrán ser utilizadas por cualquiera, siempre que se respete la paternidad y la integridad de la obra.) por supuesto siempre teniendo en cuenta lo establecido en el Art. 9 (Cuando la obra original pertenezca al patrimonio cultural común, el adaptador, traductor o transformador gozará de todos los derechos que esta ley otorga sobre su versión; pero no podrá oponerse a que otros utilicen la misma obra originaria para producir versiones diferentes.) Todas esas caracteristicas se conforman a la descripcion del fair use rationale establecido por Wikipedia. No asi las otras imagenes contenidas en el commons sobre el sujeto en cuestion. --Melromero 01:57, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- No hay ninguna broma. Si hay buenas imágenes libres disponibles no subsisten condiciones de fair use RATIONALE, es así de sencillo. Si la imagen está en dominio público intente subirla en el Commons y el problema está resolvido. Dantadd✉ 12:37, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:RLagosWeber.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
-Nard 04:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Eugenia_huici1_300.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
84.57.78.85 05:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:FLastra.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:FLastra.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 03:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:FLastra.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:FLastra.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 03:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:EBermudez.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Melromero 03:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Image with unknown source, license or permission
[edit]Hi Melromero! In the past hours you got a warning about an Image with missing source, license or permission. Because many users ignore such important warnings I am leaving you this message to turn your attention towards it. Please fix the Image or it will be deleted in 7 days. If you have doubts COM:L will help you. Best regards,
abf /talk to me/ (using a bot) 12:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Aylwin.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Aylwin.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Mifter (talk) 00:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Deletion
[edit]Please note that blanking a page is considered on commons as vandalisme. If you want to delete something, then you have to do a nomination for deletion. Note that I see no reason to delete the galleries you have emptied. After all, these galleries are made by several people and might evolve to something beautiful. Best regards. --Foroa (talk) 07:51, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
File tagging File:MonicaJimenez.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:MonicaJimenez.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:MonicaJimenez.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kam Solusar (talk) 03:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
File:EFreiM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Belgrano (talk) 03:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
File:Presidente-EFreiMontalva.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Belgrano (talk) 03:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Image:EDato.jpg is uncategorized since 1 June 2009.
- Image:InigoMelchorVelasco.JPG is uncategorized since 1 June 2009.
- Image:CondeDeParedes.jpg is uncategorized since 29 June 2009.
- Image:GHMendoza.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:DomingoSantaMaria.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:DiegoPortalesMinistro.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:MelchorConchayToro.jpg was uncategorized on 26 September 2009.
- Image:DJBenavente.jpg was uncategorized on 26 September 2009.
- Image:DZañartuRio.jpg was uncategorized on 26 September 2009.
- Image:JLSanfuentes.jpg was uncategorized on 26 September 2009.
- Image:MJYrarrazavalL.jpg was uncategorized on 26 September 2009.
- Image:PRamirezR.jpg was uncategorized on 27 September 2009.
- Image:APratC.jpg was uncategorized on 27 September 2009.
- Image:MAZañartu.jpg was uncategorized on 27 September 2009.
- Image:RSubercaseauxP.jpg was uncategorized on 27 September 2009.
- Image:LClaroSolar.jpg was uncategorized on 27 September 2009.
- Image:EOyarzunM.jpg was uncategorized on 27 September 2009.
- Image:RWachholtzA.jpg was uncategorized on 27 September 2009.
- Image:RSantelicesC.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
- Image:GBarrosJ.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
- Image:ManuelSalinasG.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
- Image:LMartinianoRodriguezH.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
- Image:ASubercaseauxP.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
- Image:EAninatU.jpg was uncategorized on 8 October 2009.
- Image:GGallardoN.jpg was uncategorized on 11 October 2009.
- Image:AEdwardsV.jpg was uncategorized on 11 October 2009.
- Image:MelchorConchaToro01.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:04, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:EBoeninger.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:EBoeninger.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:EBoeninger.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 18:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:HCubillosS.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:HCubillosS.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:HCubillosS.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Martin H. (talk) 18:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:MShweitzerS.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:MShweitzerS.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:MShweitzerS.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Martin H. (talk) 18:29, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
File:FHerreraL.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 06:50, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
I have some doubts that you read the requirement of Template talk:PD-Chile... The requirement is
- The work was published and the author died before September 16, 1962.
In fact this means: You can not upload photographs created after 1962 under this template. But you did this with File:MCostabalL.jpg and others. Other photographs will become public domain 70 years after the authors death and there you can use Template:PD-old instead. And btw., can you explain why File:EFigueroaGeisse.jpg is public domain?? --Martin H. (talk) 06:54, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:JoseToha.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:JoseToha.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:JoseToha.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Martin H. (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
File:MCostabalL.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 07:11, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:PCarvajal.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:PCarvajal.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Martin H. (talk) 07:12, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:PatricioRojas.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PatricioRojas.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:PatricioRojas.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Martin H. (talk) 07:13, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:EAninatU.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:EAninatU.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:EAninatU.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Martin H. (talk) 13:46, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:EFigueroaGeisse.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:EFigueroaGeisse.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:EFigueroaGeisse.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 13:46, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:AZaldivarL.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:AZaldivarL.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:AZaldivarL.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 13:46, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
End uploading copyright protected images, provide sources
[edit]Please stop uploading copyrighted images from unfree sources. “National Library of Chile” is no source at all. --Polarlys (talk) 21:59, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
File:Carrera.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Belgrano (talk) 22:04, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Macdonald-zebra-knopf.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:06, 11 September 2016 (UTC)