User talk:Mattes/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archives: Part 1 · Part 2 · Part 3 · Part 4 · Part 5

de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Matt1971 – en:User talk:Scriberius – fr:Discussion Utilisateur:Mathieu.Sebulke – it:Discussioni utente:Matt1971 – pl:Dyskusja Wikipedysty:Matt1971

Add a new section

New section

Could you please explain...

I saw you replace Category:Nunavut with Category:Canadian North. Could you please explain this replacement?

Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 23:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi, the sub-cat. Category:Resolute, Nunavut is still in there. Greetz, --Mattes (talk) 05:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

File:Pos-licht.bb.gif

BotMultichillT 20:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Vindelicia=Haus Munich.JPG

Hallo Mattes, ich wollte die Kategorie Munich Altstadt buildings ursprünglich in die übergeordnete Kategorie verschieben und habe erst dann gesehen, dass es eine Kategorie Vindelikerhaus gar nicht gibt, und in Lueg ins Land passt es nicht so richtig rein. Gibts eigentlich auch eine Kategorie für ehemalige Gebäude? Bisher habe ich da in Commons nichts gefunden.

Soweit ich weiß, enthält nur der rechte Teil des Vindelikerhauses, der nicht bemalt ist, Reste des alten Wachturms. Dort ist sogar noch eine Schießscharte erhalten. Hast du auch ein Foto, wo das zu sehen ist? Grüße --Bjs (talk) 11:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Bjs! Freut mich, dass Du meine Fotos verwenden konntest. Die Schießscharte fotografiere ich Dir mal im Ende Februar, ich bin erstmal noch in Unterfranken. Es gibt für die ehemaligen Gebäude die Ober-Kat. "former buildings", siehe auch User_talk:Mattes/Archive_3#Category:Schwarzes_Haus. Schön, dass Du so viele Artikel über die Münchner Geschichte geschrieben hast. Lueg ins Land paßt tatsächlich nicht, weil das Gebäude in der Marienstraße situiert ist ... MfG, --Mattes (talk) 22:03, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Mattes, die Diskussion former/demolished habe ich gelesen, in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia ist die Verwendung von "Ehemaliges Gebäude" auch nicht so klar. Ich werde also auch demolished für nicht mehr bestehende und former für in der Funktion veränderte gebäude verwenden. Grüße --Bjs (talk) 19:56, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

OK --Mattes (talk) 21:20, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

FOP in Italy

Yes, you understand: in Italy there aren't exceptions for pictures taken in public places. So, if your photo shows a copyrighted work of art (note: a car or a landscape aren't pieces of art. Instead, a sculpure or a building are works of art. See COM:DW for further informations about "derivative work" concept) you can't public it under a free license: it is an unauthorized derivative work. For publication, you need the artist's permission. And this is not enough! :( Also, if you are an Italian citizen, you can't public photos about public domain works of art, because on these photo there are also Non-copyright restrictions. If you are an US citizien, I believe that you can public your photo on en.wiki under fair use: see en:Template:Non-free 3D art.--Trixt (talk) 18:35, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Ohhh, I'm sorry. Only in this moment I noticed that the subject of your shot is not the building on the background, but the police's car! I'm so sorry... I restore the photo immediately. Thank you for your patience.--Trixt (talk) 18:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for restoring! --Mattes (talk) 06:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

"Photographs of signs" categories

Hi, I was wondering if you have any objection to the following categories that you created or changed being renamed:

"Category:Photographs of signs" → "Category:Signs"
"Category:Photographs of signs in Germany" → "Category:Signs in Germany"
"Category:Photographs of signs in Italy" → "Category:Signs in Italy"
"Category:Photographs of signs in Thailand" → "Category:Signs in Thailand"

Most of the images at the Commons are photographs anyway, so it is not really necessary to have both an "XYZ" category and a "Photographs of XYZ" category. If you have no objections, I will list the categories for renaming at "User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands". — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 16:41, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello Jacklee,

Thanks for joining the discussion. Yes I would like to reject that proposal stating that:

people may look for just ("Most of the images at the Commons are photographs anyway")
we have a "diagrams of signs" also so they is a place for the photographs, too.

Your stated categories ("Photographs of signs in <country>") were recently emptied by a bot ^(disc.) without prior notice or discussion. I'd like to have a regular discussion the next time prior to any actions ...

I have no idea what to do next, because the Bot owner does not answer.

Greetings from Bad Kissingen, --Mattes (talk) 17:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC) P.S. RE: Bot -- Of course, it is not an owner but an operator.

The problem is that it is confusing to have both "XYZ" and "Photographs of XYZ". Some editors will put photographs in the first category and some in the second, so what will happen is that photographs of XYZ will get split over two categories. Files at the Commons are generally photographs, so that is the default. These are best placed in the main "XYZ" category. Then special types of files can go into specific subcategories (such as "Diagrams of XYZ", "Symbols of XYZ", "XYZ in art", and so on). Will you reconsider? Otherwise, I suggest listing the categories at "Commons:Categories for discussion" so that other editors can provide their views.

If you have a query about a bot move and the bot owner is not responding, you can try leaving a message at the Village Pump. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 17:12, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. It's fine with me to delete -- Talk to you later (gotta go) ... Bye, --Mattes (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

OK, thanks very much. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 06:54, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:BGN LY King David Lounge birdseyeview.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:BGN LY King David Lounge birdseyeview.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:BGN LY King David Lounge birdseyeview.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

DrKiernan (talk) 11:46, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Eurogames Munich.JPG

Schreibst du bitte dazu, wo das eingraviert ist. --Fg68at de:Disk 15:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

OK Danke für den Hinweis, --Mattes (talk) 07:28, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Hochwasserschutz Bad Kissingen 2003 - 2007 - Schild.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:39, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

File:BOSTRAB-Signale.jpg

Please, do you know what mean the depicted signs with numbers "5" and "10" in Braunschweig? In the Czech Republic and Slovakia, just similar signs are used as speed limit signs for trams. --ŠJů (talk) 23:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, they have the same meaning in Germany (start of a maximum speed according to BO Strab), see http://www.meyer-strassenbahn.de/BOStrab/bostrab-signale-start.htm See you around, --Mattes (talk) 07:16, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Nolde, Emil - La Cima della Pala and la Vezzana - 1897.jpg

Hi Mattes, I'm about to speedy-delete File:Nolde, Emil - La Cima della Pala and la Vezzana - 1897.jpg, which you uploaded. The author of the painting, Emil Nolde, died in 1956, so the painting won't enter the public domain until 2027. Pruneau^talk 12:06, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Judas.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Judas.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Herr Kriss (talk) 22:34, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

[1]

Please don't revert my edits when you don't know how it works. The source in description page is source of the file, but there's no source and author of original work. I know, it looks old and it's probably PD, but i'm not sure, that's why i added this template. We had some problems with old-looking pictures which really are modern works. Herr Kriss (talk) 02:53, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

The source is stated in the Commons file since 2009-03-09. That is what your concern was about. I thought that you have not seen the URL so I've reverted it. Now you're saying the atuhor is not stated. Yes, that is true. --Mattes (talk) 06:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Nachtrag: Sei so gut und artikuliere Dich nächstes Mal klarer. Die Bemerkung "when you don't know how it works" kann ich nicht nachvollziehen. --Mattes (talk) 13:32, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Infrared_dog-cropped.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Infrared_dog-cropped.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Herr Kriss (talk) 03:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

NASA belongs the U.S. federal government. --Mattes (talk) 06:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Judas.jpg

File:Judas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

I changed the nsd to a deletion request, I hope someone can recognize or find out about the image. Cheers, --Infrogmation (talk) 18:22, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Bad Kissingen, Maxbrunnen - Westseite, nah.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Category:Taken with Fujifilm FinePix S5700

Hallo Mattes, in dieser Category stimmt vieles nicht. Die weitaus meisten Dateien darin sind keine Videos sondern Fotos, so dass die übergeornete Category nicht Category:Videos by camera sein darf. Die Mischung von Fotos und Videos in einer Category halte ich hier für problematisch. Kannst Du Dir das bitte mal ansehen? Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 22:45, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Hallo

Hmm, die Kategorie heißt ja "Taken with Fujifilm FinePix S5700". Da ist nicht die Rede davon, dass es Photographien sind (die Beschreibung sagt es auch nicht: "English: Media captured with Fujifilm FinePix S5700. Deutsch: Aufnamen mit dem Kameramodell Fujifilm FinePix S5700 (Fotografien, Videos und Tonaufnahmen)"). Du kannst aber die Videozuordnung herausnehmen, wenn sie nicht ins Konzept paßt (keine Ahnung, in welche Fuji-Kategorien die Videos mittels Fujifilm FinePix S5700 dann hingehören). --Mattes (talk) 22:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

So, ich glaube, ich habe es jetzt passend gemacht, so wie es bei anderen Kameras auch ist. Siehe Category:Videos by video camera. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 11:04, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Danke, sieht gut aus! --Mattes (talk) 03:59, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Polski Fiat 126p

It's not a hatchback. This car is a rear-engine vehicle, so it would be better to call it fastback. If it was a hatchback, back window would open simultaneously with a trunk door. Regards, Pitak (talk) 08:34, 24 April 2010 (UTC).

Polski Fiat 126p

oh sorry. Thanks for your modification in the file. Greetings from Bad Kissingen, --Mattes (talk) 08:42, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Paintings on stamps

Hi Mattes, ich wollte nur mal sagen, ich finde es echt toll, dass du die ganzen Gemälde auf Briefmarken mit den Originalpaintings spickst - ein echter Mehrwert. Vielen Dank dafür. Gruß NobbiP 14:56, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Hallo - Ja, danke, ich habe schon einige fehlende Originale gefunden und dann hochgeladen (außerdem sogar einige, die überhaupt nicht im Netz auffindbar sind). Danke für das Lob, ich heiße Rückmeldungen immer willkommen! Ciao, --Mattes (talk) 15:00, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

... kann es sein, dass du hier ein neues Hobby gefunden hast ;-) ;-) ;-) (aber lass dich bloss nicht aufhalten) Grüßle, NobbiP 14:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Hab' ja sonst nichts zu tun :-) Ich bin am überlegen, ob ich für fehlende Originalvorlagen eine Kategorie anlegen soll und vor allem wie sie heißen soll. Auf Deutsch etwa "Category:Postwerzeichen, deren Originalmotive noch nicht bei Commons vorhanden sind", aber es muß ja englisch sein. Also wie wäre es mit "Category:Stamps with missing originals on Commons" oder "Category:Stamp original motifs not in Commons"? Man könnte sogar "stamp" ganz weglassen (Kopien-Thematik) Du könntest bitte mal mitüberlegen, weil Du ja genau weißt, um was es geht^^ --Mattes (talk) 15:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Die Idee finde ich gut! Mein Vorschlag wäre wie Deiner aber mit Bezug auf "Paintings" also z.B. Category:Painings on Stamps with missing originals on Commons - aber Vorsicht, bei einigen zeitgenössischen Malern besteht auf deren Bildern (von Briefmarken abgesehen, natürlich Copyrigt. z.B. James Rizzi oder Walter Womacka Gruß NobbiP 17:09, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Danke für den guten Vorschlag, habe category:Paintings on Stamps with missing originals on Commons angelegt. Für die einzelnen Künstlerkategorien, für die noch keine PD-Art-Lizenz möglich ist, gibt es ja eine eigene Vorlage mit einem entspr. Hinweis. Frohes Schaffen, --Mattes (talk) 18:15, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

File:KFZ-Zulassungsplakette des Landkreises Mecklenburg-Strelitz, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.jpg

File:KFZ-Zulassungsplakette des Landkreises Mecklenburg-Strelitz, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--PawełMM (talk) 16:25, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Could you please be a bit more careful with your edits?

So this doesn't happen? Cheers and happy editing. Ingolfson (talk) 02:11, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry for that, don't know how this happened ... Yes, I will act more carefully in the future. Thanks for the repair! Bye, --Mattes (talk) 08:11, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

No worries. I only mentioned it at all because if some third party had then come along (not knowing that a wrong edit had occured) and added or changed further stuff, unraveling the wrong stuff from the "correct old stuff" and the "correct new stuff" could have gotten much, much messier. But meh, no harm intended or done. Cheers, Ingolfson (talk) 11:41, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

A mistake?

Hi. "+2" isn't an apposite edit summary for the edit which erased the current content without reasoning. --ŠJů (talk) 03:15, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello ŠJů

Yes, the removal was not on purpose. What the heck ... ?! Should use "show changes" the next time or preview :-/

Bye, --Mattes (talk) 07:23, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Renaming requests

Hi, could you work on these renaming requests? They have not been done for some time:

Thanks very much. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 10:46, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Done Mattes (talk) 11:03, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 11:09, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

You bet ... :-) --Mattes (talk) 11:19, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Juno Beach Centre Courseulles-sur-Mer, 2005-07-09 01.jpg

Hello,

Thanks for the renaming. But in my view the original Flickr title should remmain unchanged. Teofilo (talk) 17:30, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I'm a bit confused ... that was your request?! --Mattes (talk) 18:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Is that more clear ? (you may revert if you disagree). Teofilo (talk) 13:19, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

German army boots model 2000

Hello. Can I answer you concerning German army boots?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kampfstiefel-Bundeswehr.JPG — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] • contribs)

What's your question? --Mattes (talk) 18:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

These boots are original or replica? Who is manufacturer?

I received them from w:Bundeswehr (original) while being in the reserve. Dunno where they are now so I cannot look for the manufacturer. Catch ya latR, --Mattes (talk) 15:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Category:Vatican City

Category discussion notification

Category:Vatican City has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--Teofilo (talk) 13:14, 17 June 2010 (UTC)==

Rome 2009

Excellent altogetther.Especially the Government buildings, signs,and machines.... - the detail of very day.Somehow I always like the pics I intended to take but forgot to most of all.Glad you got back to Rome. All the best from Ireland Robert aka Notafly (talk) 15:11, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello Robert, thanks for your nice feedback! Nobody has made remarks about my captures before :-/ I still did not upload all 3,000 images of Rome, I cannot do it unless I get my data back (hard disk problem). See you around, --Mattes (talk) 15:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

B&W

	Hello, Mattes. You have new messages at Category talk:Black and white reproductions of paintings. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

File:Tom Yam Pla Buek.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:57, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Interessanter Flickr-Nutzer

Der Photostream http://www.flickr.com/photos/28433765@N07/ lohnt einen Blick. Auch schöne Sammlungen, z.B. Prado. --Martin H. (talk) 22:44, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Danke für den Tipp, der hat viel in guter Qualität hochgeladen und gut geordnet. Das Prado-Set ist auch nicht übel: [2]. Grüße, --Mattes (talk) 06:40, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Google Earth ???

Hallo Mattes, was hat ein Bild von Hieronimus Bosch wie dieses mit Category:Google Earth zu tun? Verstehe ich nicht, vermutlich auch sonst niemand. -- Ies (talk) 17:23, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Hallo, die Bilddateien/Fotografien sind von Google, Inc. (Google Earth) finanziert resp. in Auftrag gegeben worden. → youtube. 14 Gemälde im Prado wurden in der jemals größten Auflösung abfotografiert. --Mattes (talk) 17:47, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Offizielle Seite (Engl.): http://www.google.com/intl/en/landing/prado/ --Mattes (talk) 04:52, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Ware da ein andere Kategoriename nicht sinnvoller und weniger irreführend? Mein Vorschlag ist Category:Paintings in the Prado Museum pictured by Google Earth, mit den Elternkategorien Category:Paintings in the Prado Museum und Category:Google Earth. Einverstanden? -- Ies (talk) 15:36, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Also, das ist zwar nicht irreführend (Quelle steht in jeder entspr. Datei), aber mach' es so. --Mattes (talk) 15:43, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Favorite files/Sound

I feel very flattered to be in your list of favorite files (twice: Domus Patri and Laus Pluviae). Thanks. The band (officially) is named "Kleuske & the Bad Boys", both songs are from the album "Out There", which nobody ever heard of. Kleuske (talk) 19:49, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

nice songs. I found them by accident ... Thanks for producing and uploading! Best regards, --Mattes (talk) 01:44, 17 July 2010 (UTC) P.S. in the File:Laus pluviae.ogg, children voices can be heard in the background. Is that on purpose?

Yup. The kid is crying "Moooom! It Rains!" (in dutch). My microphone was open by accident (i was recording the sound of rain), but the fragment was too good not to use. Kleuske (talk) 12:00, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

oh

OK! Keep up your production :-) Best regards, --Mattes (talk) 18:30, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Since you're my biggest (well... only) fan, check this out. I posted my music online, since i did not want to abuse commons as a publication medium. You're free to up- and download it and to spread it around, it's all CC-by-SA. Grusse... Kleuske (talk) 11:13, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Mattes!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:17, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Image:Telecom-icon.jpg was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:17, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-08-16/News and notes

Hello. I am a HK Wikipedian and I am now going to tell you a bad news: your photo about Hong Kong is plagiarize by the Hong Kong Book publisher. See the link on the title to see the news. We are discussion now in Chinese Wikipedia, fell free to give comment in Chinese or English. If it is in English, we will translate it. Thanks and hope you can reply. (Leave comments on zh:WT:HK) -Waihorace (talk) 10:48, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi -- I don't know which photo you're referring to. --Mattes (talk) 16:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Russian consulate-general in Munich

Hi Mattes, some time ago User:Rufus46 took a photo of the Russian consulate-general in Munich for me, which can be found at File:Russisches Konsulat Muenchen-1.jpg. In April 2010, the consulate-general relocated to a new building at Maria-Theresia-Straße 17, 81675 München, and I will be needing a photo of this. Full details of what I need, and why I need them, can be found at: en:User:Russavia/Required_photos#Munich. Is there any possibility that you may be able to help with this photo request at all? Any assistance/advice would be appreciated. Cheers, --russavia (talk) 17:18, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

No prob until the next two weeks (that's right around the corner of the Constulates I've captured recently). --Mattes (talk) 20:38, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Deutsches_Museum_-_Historisches_Werbeplakat.JPG

File:Deutsches_Museum_-_Historisches_Werbeplakat.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

–Tryphon ^☂ 07:57, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Screenshots from "Earthly Delights" with different resolutions

Hi! Thanks for uploading the high-resolution screenshots of details of Bosch's "Garden of Earthly Delights". I have been adding them as annotations to File:The Garden of Earthly Delights by Bosch High Resolution.jpg. However I noted an artifact on File:Bosch, Hieronymus - The Garden of Earthly Delights, central panel - Detail Men upside down (upper left).jpg: some areas of that image appear to have lower resolution than others. I had the same problem when stitching the big image together: sometimes Google Earth appears to serve different resolutions. Could you try to fix it? Thanks, AxelBoldt (talk) 15:12, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Well the reason for that is that I have made screenshots with different resolutions, I assume the photographs of eaxh picure made by Google (at least in their behalf) are made out of one piece. These are professional photographs → Video "Making of". Instead of stichting 'em together try to make a screenshot of a specific section yourself, e.g. with IrfanView. It's so easy that even I achieved to do it :-) Greetings, --Mattes (talk) 16:54, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Well, I don't know whether it's Google, the screenshots or the stitching, but there are definitely two rectangles in File:Bosch, Hieronymus - The Garden of Earthly Delights, central panel - Detail Men upside down (upper left).jpg that have lower resolution than the rest. I have marked them on the image with annotations. AxelBoldt (talk) 12:27, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

I understand now, that might be an IrfanView problem (screenshot). Try to take a look at the original. I'm not able to fix that unfortunately. You might add a {{Tlc}} template and/or contact a graphics lab (Commons/Wikipedias). Greetings, --Mattes (talk) 12:52, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

de:Amtsgericht Fulda

Hallo Mattes, Du hast nicht zufällig auch ein Foto des Gebäudes? Der Artikel auf de.WP würde sicher davon profitieren. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 12:53, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Hallo, leider muss ich da passen. In dem Moment, wo ich vor Ort war, hat es furchtbar geregnet. Ich habe daher darauf verzichtet. Ich meinte auch, dass so ein großes Gebäude bereits bei dem Commons ist ... → ist vorgemerkt --Mattes (talk) 13:46, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Danke! --4028mdk09 (talk) 13:51, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Irrtum meinerseits, hab ich doch aufgenommen: File:Fulda - Justizgebäude (Treppe und Skulptur).JPG --Mattes (talk) 10:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Danke - auch fürs Einbinden. --4028mdk09 (talk) 12:10, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Immer wieder gern; Hoffentlich komm ich mal mit mehr Zeit in die schöne Stadt, dann gibt's mehr pics :-) --Mattes (talk) 13:01, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Caspar Aquila - Wider den spöttischen Lügner und unverschämten Verleumder M. Isleblum Agricolam (title page).jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:54, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Philips.JPG

Ich versteh nicht, was du dort getan haben willst. --Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Bei der Vorschau habe ich die Meldung bekommen, dass mit dem Dateiname bereits ein Bild existiert (Rasiererwerbung). Irgendwie bin ich auf den falschen Knopf gekommen und es wurde überschrieben. Wieso das in der Versionsgeschichte nicht erscheint, ist mir schleicherhaft. Jedenfalls einfach löschen. Ich wollte ja eh einen besseren Dateinamen. --Mattes (talk) 09:50, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Was du gesehen hast, war wohl File:Philips.jpg. Die ist aber noch intakt. Trotzdem löschen? --Túrelio (talk) 09:52, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

ach so, also File:Philips.JPG muß weg. Das mit der Werbung kann bleiben (Lizenz naja...). Danke, --Mattes (talk) 10:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Peter.shaman (talk) 18:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

File:DB-Werbung_1980er_Jahre_"Alle_reden_vom_Wetter._Wir_nicht.".jpg

File:DB-Werbung_1980er_Jahre_"Alle_reden_vom_Wetter._Wir_nicht.".jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

sугсго 20:28, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

template information missing

Hallo Mattes,

da niemand die Kategorie abarbeitet, wäre es vielleicht sinnvoller, wenn du die Vorlage selbst einfügst. Dazu gibt es auch ein Gadget unter Special:Preferences einstellbar. Das Ergenis muss allerdings nachbearbeitet werden.

Grüße --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 17:32, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Sinnvoll wäre es. Hoffentlich erbarmt sich mal jemand. Ich finde, dass ich hier schon genug "Hausmeisterarbeit" verrichte. Meine wertvolle Zeit verwende ich derzeit erstmal anderweitig auf Commons. Wie Du evtl. bemerkt hast, habe ich meine Aktivität vorübergehend stark heruntergefahren. Es gibt auch noch andere Dinge im Leben. Das Gadget kannte ich noch nicht; muß ich mal anschauen. Danke für die Info. Alles Gute, --Mattes (talk) 18:25, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— Jeff G. ツ 04:13, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Jan van Kessel

Jan van Kessel el Mozo, activo en España y pintor de retratos no es el mismo Jan van Kesel llamado the Younger, que nunca estuvo en España y pintaba bodegones. Están en un error, confunden dos personas distintas, error que se repite en en:wiki. Sólo tiene que mirar las imágenes para comprobar que de ningún modo puede haber pintado esos cuadros la misma persona.

please create the category, thanks! --Mattes (talk) 19:15, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Combat_Action_Ribbon.png

File:Combat_Action_Ribbon.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

75.69.64.117 17:29, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Federal_Bureau_of_Prisons_Central_office.jpg

File:Federal_Bureau_of_Prisons_Central_office.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

66.173.140.100 19:55, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Federal_Bureau_of_Prisons_Seal.jpg

File:Federal_Bureau_of_Prisons_Seal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

66.173.140.100 12:51, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

File:MCPON.gif

File:MCPON.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Benchill (talk) 12:29, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Image:Va 2euro sede.jpg

Image:Va 2euro sede.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Asclepias (talk) 13:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Question about Google Arts Project detail

Hi Mattes, I noticed your recent upload of File:Lastman, Pieter - Orestes and Pylades Disputing at the Altar (detail triangle player).jpg from the Google Arts Project. What confuses me is that the resolution of the image - 756 x 733 - appears to be higher than the maximum resolution available from Google (about 488 x 468 for the same detail). Did you upscale this image, or did Google used to have higher resolution for this image, or what happened? Thanks! Dcoetzee (talk) 22:19, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I have enlarged it :-) --Mattes (talk) 06:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Contradictory tags: Saying something is public domain and requiring attribution

Hi. At the page https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/File:Beethoven_-_Piano_Sonata_No._28_in_A_Major,_Op._101_-_I._Etwas_lebhaft,_und_mit_der_innigsten_Empfindung.ogg I found your edit there at 17:48, 27 September 2009 which added the tag/template "The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that the copyright holder is properly attributed. Redistribution, derivative work, commercial use, and all other use is permitted." while previously Daniel Veesey had already waived his rights to the musical work: "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Daniel Veesey. This applies worldwide.". That makes the page say that public domain requires attribution which is not true. Thank you for your time. Logictheo (talk) 19:38, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello. Don't know what you mean, in addition, there is no edit done at 17:48 h in that file. Maybe you're bothered by {{Attribution}}? diff 2009-09-27T19:48:09 --Mattes (talk) 19:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

The {{Attribution}} template adds a "You need to attribute" kind of reasoning. Public Domain works do not require attribution. Logictheo (talk) 20:18,20:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

"Hello. Don't know what you mean" << I think this helps: On the page it says "Musopen has requested a courtesy in-line attribution in any article this file is used in.". That means from my interpretation that Musopen wishes to be attributed. Now that is only a wish and not a legal requirement. As by their new faq at http://www.musopen.org/faq.php on the section "2. What is the public domain?" where they explain what Public Domain is. Logictheo (talk) 20:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Oh, Category_talk:Musopen#Wrong_tag_or_contradictory_tags.3F. I have added at least 20 files with that template. Most or at least old versions of 99% of Musopen-sourced files contain this:

[...] We do ask, out of courtesy, two things. One, that you do not directly sell our recordings for profit, as a great amount of work has been donated to this project, and for the benefit of the public, not profit. Two, we ask that any commerical or derived works attribute Musopen somewhere, to give credit to this project. And for all the film students emailing, yes you may use it in your film, you can then sell the film, containing our music. It's in the public domain afterall.
— http://www.musopen.com/faq.html

Should we be nice and include it (which may not be in accordance to PD) oder just ignore the request (wish) ... --Mattes (talk) 20:44, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

category:Joconde

Hello Mattes, do you mind if I nominate category:Joconde for selection. It has been replace by two automatically populated categories: d category:Images from Joconde for images that were copied from Joconde and category:Base Joconde for pages that just have a link to a Joconde entry.--Zolo (talk) 07:54, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

By the way do you have any info about File:Kessel, Jan van I - L'entrée de l'arche - 1725-1750.jpg, I have mentionned some problems on its talk page.--Zolo (talk) 07:58, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Category:Joconde should be a redir. The image you've noted is new to me. --Mattes 15:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

For this kind of "flat" source categories it seems better (more maintainable) to use a template rather than add them manually ({{From Joconde}} adds category:images from Joconde. It thus does not make much sense have a redirect. Additionnally category redirect seem to be rather incovenient (and thus often get deleted) and it is not clear whether category Joconde means "referenced in Joconde" or "image taken from Joconde" so I don't know wether it should redirect to category:images from Joconde or category:Base Joconde (granted ("Base Joconde" is not very clear either but since it is added through a template it is very simple to fix that).--Zolo (talk) 13:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Trycatch (talk) 12:34, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Category:Stamps

Category discussion notification

Category:Stamps has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--ŠJů (talk) 23:32, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Pieter Bruegel the Elder- The Magpie on the Gallows - detail.JPG

I think, you are in mistake about impossibility. Please, reply here. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:47, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Deutsches Freimaurermuseum Bayreuth - inventory (596).jpg

Have no idea what a "bijous" is, but that's a translation into metal form of the famous Charlemagne signature (mirror-reversed to make an imprint, I presume)... AnonMoos (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

... de:Bijou#Freimaurerei --Mattes (talk) 16:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

—

pixelio User:Mattes/Projects/Future uploads

@User:Mattes/Projects/Future uploads Hallo Mattes, beachte, dass viele (oder gar alle - das weiß ich nicht) der pixelio-Lizenzen nicht Commons-kompatibel sind, da sie meist bestimmte Nutzungsarten ausschließen. Siehe auch: de:Wikipedia:Bilder_von_pixelquelle.de (allerdings nicht mehr ganz aktuell - aber es hat sich anscheinend nichts geändert) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 19:59, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Gott zum Gruße! Danke für die Info. Bei PD-Art und PD-old kann man aber doch grundsätzlich alle Fotografien von zweidimensionalen Motiven hier hochladen resp. bei Wikimediaprojekten einbinden unabhängig davon, was der Einsteller wünscht oder nicht wünscht vgl. en:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. Hoffe, ich sehe das richtig.

Das sagt {{PD-Art/de}}:

Dies ist eine originalgetreue fotografische Reproduktion eines zweidimensionalen Kunstwerks. Das Kunstwerk an sich ist aus dem folgenden Grund gemeinfrei:

	This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer. You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. Note that a few countries have copyright terms longer than 70 years: Mexico has 100 years, Jamaica has 95 years, Colombia has 80 years, and Guatemala and Samoa have 75 years. This image may not be in the public domain in these countries, which moreover do not implement the rule of the shorter term. Honduras has a general copyright term of 75 years, but it does implement the rule of the shorter term. Copyright may extend on works created by French who died for France in World War II (more information), Russians who served in the Eastern Front of World War II (known as the Great Patriotic War in Russia) and posthumously rehabilitated victims of Soviet repressions (more information).
	This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights.

Nach offizieller Ansicht der Wikimedia Foundation sind originalgetreue Reproduktionen zweidimensionaler gemeinfreier Werke gemeinfrei. Diese fotografische Reproduktion wird daher auch als gemeinfrei in den Vereinigten Staaten angesehen. Die Verwendung dieser Werke kann in anderen Rechtssystemen verboten oder nur eingeschränkt erlaubt sein. Zu Details siehe Reuse of PD-Art photographs.

{{PD-Art}} template without license parameter: please specify why the underlying work is public domain in both the source country and the United States
(Usage: {{PD-Art|1=|deathyear=''year of author's death''|country=''source country''}}, where parameter 1= can be PD-old-auto, PD-old-auto-expired, PD-old-auto-1996, PD-old-100 or similar. See Commons:Multi-license copyright tags for more information.)

Das sagt Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag This page in a nutshell: {{PD-Art}} may be used by the uploader of a photograph taken by somebody else to assert that the photograph can have no independent copyright as it is simply a faithful reproduction of an old, public domain, two-dimensional work of art. The tag can be used on any such photograph regardless of the source country, following a poll in July 2008. (gibt's nicht auf Deutsch)

Das sagt {{PD-old/de}}: Template:PD-old/de

Das sagt {{Copyright claims/en}}:

While Commons policy accepts the use of this media,

one or more third parties have made copyright claims against Wikimedia Commons in relation to the work from which this is sourced or a purely mechanical reproduction thereof. This may be due to recognition of the "sweat of the brow" doctrine, allowing works to be eligible for protection through skill and labour, and not purely by originality as is the case in the United States (where this website is hosted). These claims may or may not be valid in all jurisdictions. As such, use of this image in the jurisdiction of the claimant or other countries may be regarded as copyright infringement. Please see Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag for more information.

This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. See Commons:Licensing.

(gibt's nicht auf Deutsch)

(tifft z.B. auf National Portrait Gallery zu > User:Dcoetzee/NPG legal threat/Coverage).

Bis die Tage, --Mattes (talk) 21:41, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Ja, ich wusste nicht, dass dort auch Reprofotos von gemeinfreien zweidimensionalen Werken sind. Ja, die kannst du natürlich "holen". Entschuldige bitte die Verwirrung. :-) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 22:04, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Frans_Francken_(II),_Kunst-_und_Raritätenkammer_(1636,_detail).jpg

File:Frans_Francken_(II),_Kunst-_und_Raritätenkammer_(1636,_detail).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— billinghurst sDrewth 05:08, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Category:Black_and_white_photographs_of_people

Category discussion notification

Category:Black_and_white_photographs_of_people has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

ELEKHH^T 06:27, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Deletion of images of Canadian coins

Several images of Canadian coins have been listed for deletion so that the community can discuss if they should be kept or not. We would appreciate if you could contribute your opinion, seeing as you created a category that is now up for deletion. The discussion is here: Commons:Deletion requests/Coins of Canada. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:58, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

You are now a image-reviewer!

I have assigned you the image-reviewer right per your successful request at Commons:License review/requests. Please review Commons:License review one more time before you start reviewing. Feel free to ask on my talk page if you have any questions. MorganKevinJ^(talk) 03:38, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Permission to use one of your photo for documentary video

Dear Matt,

I would like to ask something about the permission to use one of your photo on Don Muang Airport in our documentary video project. Is it possible for you to email me to discuss further about this? Appreciate so much for your help in advance. My email will be tanyikyu@gmail.com

Cheers, Yikyu

I will only discuss the issue only here. Please specify further details (e.g. URL). Greetings, --Mattes (talk) 14:16, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. The photo we wanted to use is http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Don_Mueang_Airport_near_Bangkok_-_Skyway_seen_from_domestic_terminal.JPG

1) Are we allow to use this photo in the documentary project under the free use license? Can I know what's the procedure that need to be done? 2) How should the credit be put at the video's 'end credit' screen?

Thanks

Cheers, yikyu

Hi again!(1) An image has a specified license, that one is here is "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported". If you state that in your documentary, the usage is granted (you don't have to ask). (2) Credit: "User:Mattes (Wikimedia Commons)". Best wishes, --Mattes (talk) 05:24, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Mattes, Just a courtesy to notify you. Thanks again.

Cheers,yikyu

File:Water Taxi.jpg

Hi Mattes, bist du der Urheber der oben genannten Datei? Ich habe sie ein wenig aufgeräumt, es war aber nicht eindeutig ob du die Datei auch erstellt hast oder nur von en.Wikipedia nach Wikimedia Commons transferiert hast. Kannst du vielleicht bitte noch den Urheber hinzufügen? Danke schön. --Pilettes (talk) 20:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi there! Well, unfortunately I did not take the photograph. I don't know who it took. It was some years ago. Today, I would of course name the author in the file.

"Originally uploaded on en.wikipedia (transferred to commons by Mattes)

This file was originally uploaded at en.wikipedia as Water_Taxi.jpg, before it was transferred to Commons.". Thanks for clean-up. Anyone able to look up the photographer in the original file description (deleted)? Ciao, --14:07, 27 May 2011 (UTC) --Mattes (talk) 16:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Notice regarding to your vote on 2010 POTY election

Hi Mattes, I am part of the Picture of the Year Organizing committee. I would like to inform you that the finalist you voted for - File:Fruitbowlwithmelons.jpg has been disqualified due to copyright issues. We have restored your voting quota so you might vote again for another image on the list. I regret any inconvenience in the mean time. Regards. — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 12:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

OK --Mattes (talk) 16:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

File:U.S. Dept. of State Mobile Security Deployment Special Agents at work 2005.jpg

Hallo Mattes, warum hast du dich hier als Urheber eingetragen? Hast du dieses Foto tatsächlich geschossen? --Túrelio (talk) 19:19, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Ups, nein - schon berichtigt. --Mattes (talk) 19:23, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Lagrenee, Louis Jean - ? - ?.jpg

Dear Mattes, I hope you enjoy reading the following: [3] --Thorvaldsson (talk) 17:02, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Great, thanks! --Mattes (talk) 17:44, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Category:Flags by color of stars

Category discussion notification

Category:Flags by color of stars has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--Metrónomo (talk) 09:47, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Mochica_Portrait.jpg

File:Mochica_Portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 04:20, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Emblem "Deutsche Antarktische Expedition 1938 39".jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:59, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

WGA images

Hi, I see you are busy categorizing WGA images - great. I thing you might find your task easier with help of {{WGA tag}} template. At the moment it does not do anything except collecting a lot of parameters from each image, but after all images are uploaded it can be used for mass categorization without bots. --Jarekt (talk) 01:33, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Your bot was very busy, 13,759 uploads! Too bad there are some duplicates, too (older uploads by other users). I just use Category:Images of WGA batch upload for finding the uploads. Template:WGA tag is a bit too complicated, it should be presented with a mask just like HotCat. HotCat is working really great (but sometimes does not fill the Edit summary automatically). Best greetings and keep up your work. Maybe Joconde comes up next... :-) BTW regarding the file names: I would like to see the family name of artists at first and then the Christian name, that way the cat piping is working accordingly without {{DEFAULTSORT}}. Anyway it is a great pleasure to get so much addings to Commons, thanks for that! --Mattes (talk) 16:40, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Yes over 5k images were already uploaded from WGA and many of them have minimal metadata. I was working on creating processes for automatically fixing those descriptions, but have to be careful not to delete contributed metadata which goes beyond WGA metadata. The next data set I have my eyes on is artyzm.com - a data base of Polish paintings, since I noticed we have very few examples of some of my favorite Polish painters. By the way, I noticed that you were working on a lot of Institution templates - please do not add categories directly to those templates but by "Homecat" field. Adding categories directly to templates also adds them to images using the templates, and those categories are impossible to remove (in order to move them to a subcategory for example) without a bot. --Jarekt (talk) 17:42, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Hmm, the templates are widely untouched by me. I guess you mean my addings of valid categories on institutions. --Mattes (talk) 14:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

I am sorry I got users confused - it is user:Mattis who was creating institution templates. My apologies. --Jarekt (talk) 15:30, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

The Deluge, by John Martin

Hello. I wonder if a naming mistake has occurred. According to http://www.muian.com/muian05/05Martin.htm the John Martin painting you uploaded and called 'The Deluge' is in fact 'Christ Stilleth the Tempest'. The Deluge is a different painting by Martin. (See also Victorian Web.) Of course, Muian and Victorian Web could be wrong, but would you be able to check your sources and make any necessary amends? I can help if you wish. Thank you. --Wavehunter (talk) 16:51, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Hmm, I need some time to check that. --Mattes (talk) 17:28, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Any joy? --Wavehunter (talk) 03:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

→ File talk:Martin, John - The Deluge - 1834.jpg#Title "The Deluge" or "Christ Stilleth the Tempest"? --Mattes (talk) 07:49, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. --Wavehunter (talk) 22:12, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:Female breasts of humans

Female breasts of humans has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

- dcljr (talk) 22:20, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

There has been more discussion lately at Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/07/Category:Female breasts of humans. - dcljr (talk) 09:28, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Facing left / facing right

Hello ! Since you've created these categories, I was wondering : what are their purpose exactly ? Are they people who really like to find pictures of objects/people facing left and not able to do a mirror transformation of a nice picture but with the object/personn facing right ? I've created Category:bicycles facing left so I'm really not talking about deleting this category, I'm just a bit curious about "what's the point ?". Léna (talk) 09:09, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi! These categories are good for remembrance (find a picture you have once seen) and for subdivisioning of the left and right categories.

Salut, --Mattes (talk) 12:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ct waikiki.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ct waikiki.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Ct waikiki.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 15:47, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Capemeares_location.gif

File:Capemeares_location.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Marcusmax(speak) 18:17, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Israel_Batch_3_(141).JPG

File:Israel_Batch_3_(141).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 20:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Israel_Batch_2_(85).JPG

File:Israel_Batch_2_(85).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 20:56, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

File:M._Beilhack_Modell_Großschleuder_(Schneeräumfahrzeug)_-_seitlich_-_Deutsches_Museum_Verkehrszentrum.JPG

File:M._Beilhack_Modell_Großschleuder_(Schneeräumfahrzeug)_-_seitlich_-_Deutsches_Museum_Verkehrszentrum.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

79.237.178.19 09:41, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Postomnibus-Modell_-_Verkehrszentrum.JPG

File:Postomnibus-Modell_-_Verkehrszentrum.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

79.237.178.19 09:41, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

File:M._Beilhack_Modell_Großschleuder_(Schneeräumfahrzeug)_-_vorne_links_-_Deutsches_Museum_Verkehrszentrum.JPG

File:M._Beilhack_Modell_Großschleuder_(Schneeräumfahrzeug)_-_vorne_links_-_Deutsches_Museum_Verkehrszentrum.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

79.237.178.19 09:46, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Category talk:Savoury salads

Hi, could you define this category you created? It is kind of difficult to understand without a proper definition (at least for me as a non-native speaker of English, even with the help of a dictionary). Thanks in advance. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 16:50, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bozen_1_(177)_copy.jpg Frankensteam (talk) 19:15, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for awarding me! ... but please don't copy files without changing the media (adjustments etc.) --Mattes (talk) 01:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Pontormo,_Jacopo_-_Vertumnus_and_Pomona_-_1519-21.jpg

File:Pontormo,_Jacopo_-_Vertumnus_and_Pomona_-_1519-21.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Pratoprovincia 22:27, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Sarto,_Andrea_del_-_Triumph_of_Caesar_-_c._1520.jpg

File:Sarto,_Andrea_del_-_Triumph_of_Caesar_-_c._1520.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Pratoprovincia 22:33, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Ligozzi,_Bartolomeo_-_Flowers,_Fruit_and_a_parrot_-_1688.jpg

File:Ligozzi,_Bartolomeo_-_Flowers,_Fruit_and_a_parrot_-_1688.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Pratoprovincia 23:46, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Good work on your photos and tasks, you should be an admin here now if your good here. Thanks Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 15:54, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks a lot!!! Best wishes, --Mattes (talk) 17:23, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Male beards in art

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

unneeded and somewhat nonsensical category Kramer Associates (talk) 04:48, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

seems like you haven't seen female beards. --Mattes (talk) 15:27, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Keep and move I withdraw the deletion request as several images under Category:Bearded ladies also fall under Category:Beards in art. I'd rather the category be called "Men with beards in art" to be consistent with the rest of the categories. --Kramer Associates (talk) 20:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Closed, nomination withdrawn. Category may be renamed without deletion listing. As category had been in use for some time, I suggest leaving a cat redirect to new name. -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:04, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tiksi-Aerodrom.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tiksi-Aerodrom.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Tiksi-Aerodrom.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Badzil (talk) 02:18, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Category:16th century oil portraits of women at bust length

Dear Mattes,
‘16th-century’ is a compound modifier used adjectivally, therefore hyphenated.
A similar mistake was made: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:18th-century_portraits_at_bust_length&action=history
--Thorvaldsson (talk) 09:50, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Category:DJanes

Category:DJanes has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 20:10, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

GrapedApe (talk) 23:34, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Sundial

Thank you for your kind words. The inscription "Pigghia e potta" means "Piglia e porta": "Get it (the Sicilian sunshine) and take it away". --User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:13, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Very nice, thanks! --Mattes (talk) 22:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Deutsches Freimaurermuseum Bayreuth - inventory (279).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Deutsches Freimaurermuseum Bayreuth - inventory (279).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Deutsches Freimaurermuseum Bayreuth - inventory (279).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Jay8g 01:29, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Sea Lions and Dolphins in Category:People with fish

Sea lions and dolphins are not fish -- fish are cold blooded and mammals are warm blooded. I have created Category:People with sea mammals and moved your recent moves there. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:01, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

great thanks, --Mattes (talk) 16:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Category:Paintings_by_Anthony_van_Dyck_in_the_Czech_Republic

Paintings by Anthony van Dyck in the Czech Republic has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Sammyday (talk) 22:32, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Airports are not buildings

Hello! You recently reverted my edits on Category:Munich Airport Riem. Please note, that airports are not buildings. (See en:Building and en:Airport for definitions.) Airport terminals, towers, hangars etc. are buildings (and we have Category:Airport buildings and its sub-categories for them) but airports themselves definitely are not. ––Apalsola ^{t • c} 20:14, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Well I think so indeed, any airport is a building in sense of a structure (runways, taxiways, maintenence buildings, tanks, hangars, roads, towers, etc.). I have seen this building assignments to airports everywhere @ Commons. We should discuss this matter on a meta level... --21:03, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

An airport is a piece of transport infrastructure and it may also be a structure, but not all structures are buildings. (See en:Nonbuilding structure.) And, according to wiktionary:en:building, a building is "[a] closed structure with walls and a roof." Airports have no walls nor roof, so they are not buildings.

About the meta level, Category:Airports has not been a subcategory of Category:Buildings since October 2008. Anyway, if you think this matter requires a broader discussion, you can start one, of course. (Please leave a notice at least on Commons talk:WikiProject Aviation.) In the meanwhile, I'll follow the meta level category hierarchy. ––Apalsola ^{t • c} 21:41, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Guess you're right, case solved. Thanks. Comparison to en: Parent cat. of w:Category:Airports is w:Category:Transport buildings and structures among others. Happy New Year! --Mattes (talk) 01:14, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Happy New Year to you, too! ––Apalsola ^{t • c} 02:06, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Michelangelo_-_Sistine_Chapel_ceiling_-_Lunette_"Hezekiah_-_Manasseh_-_Amon".jpg

File:Michelangelo_-_Sistine_Chapel_ceiling_-_Lunette_"Hezekiah_-_Manasseh_-_Amon".jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

J Milburn (talk) 02:30, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Category:Wehrmacht_Panzertruppen

Wehrmacht Panzertruppen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

91.57.86.224 01:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Munch?

Wenn das hier wirklich von Edvard Munch stammen sollte, dann muss es gelöscht werden. 91.64.140.221 22:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

scheint so, kann kein Ukrainisch: "Едвард Мунк «Мадонна»" ([4]). Ich denke, dass das Werk kaum noch erkennbar ist und daher die Schutzhöhe fehlt. --Mattes (talk) 22:16, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Nikbot, Lizenz: File:Tegernseer-Platz.nord.JPG

Hey, der Nikbot hat eine Nachricht auf meiner Disk hinterlassen, aber dir komischerweise nicht. --McZusatz (talk) 19:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC) Danke erl. OK --Mattes (talk) 05:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

File:National_Building_Museum_logo.jpg

File:National_Building_Museum_logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

B william r (talk) 16:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Renaming files for sorting purposes

I noticed that you renamed File:Chopin, Frédéric - Opus 25 - Twelve Grand Etudes - a minor (2).ogg for sorting in catogories. Using a sort tag seems to me to be preferable to renaming the file. Sort tags are more flexible, easily edited, and can be tailored to the category. --Robert.Allen (talk) 21:19, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

I find the format "family name", "first name(s)" - <further information> useful for the following reasons:

(a) uniform naming (artist's work at least)

(b) sorting w/o catpipes (sort keys) which most files do not have. Renaming is easier

Such actions are scheduled for later OK ... --Mattes (talk) 21:40, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Not OK. I think maybe you should hold off. Adding a default sort key or a sort key appropriate to a category is just as easy, and does not create more redirects with every change. Where is the consensus for this? Where is the discussion? --Robert.Allen (talk) 03:32, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Cancelled for already existing files. Commons:First_steps/Upload_form#4._Set_an_appropriate_file_name & Commons:First steps/Upload form & Commons:File renaming does not state the format described above or necessary renamings. --Mattes (talk) 06:38, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:People with black skin

Category:People with black skin has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Danmichaelo (talk) 23:38, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

call delails to 9425021453 sep 2011

i want know call details in my no

What kind of #? --Mattes (talk) 12:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Celilo mural salem capital.jpg

File:Celilo mural salem capital.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

russavia (talk) 10:54, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Old woman with young baby boy.JPG

We wanted to let you know that we've used one of your pictures in a project of ours: http://litpics.tumblr.com/post/18572319429/lit-peterkin-by-mrs-molesworth-pic-mattes

We created a computer program to generate random pairings of sentences from public domain texts and public domain / creative commons images. Some of the pictures we've selected come from the Wikipedia Commons. All the pictures we select ourselves, but the pairings and the text are random. Of these pairings that are generated, we only post the most interesting combinations.

We welcome any feedback about our site.

Thanks for sharing your pictures,
Samantha and Patrick

blog: http://litpics.tumblr.com/
email: litpicsbloggmail.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/litpics

Litpics (talk) 02:47, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

OK Glad i could contribute --Mattes (talk) 08:55, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Waschsalon.JPG

Hi! Do you remember what some of the signs inside say?

I added some image annotations at File:Waschsalon.JPG but I can't read all of the text Also, have you thought about re-visiting that washateria and taking another photo with the flash on? That way we could get a clearer image

Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 07:20, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello, the image is too blurry to read all signs. I could go there again to take a new photo. We'll see, maybe this month. Bye, --Mattes (talk) 07:32, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Okay. If/when you do take a new pic, please let me know :) WhisperToMe (talk) 08:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

File:2 Euro Gedenkmünze 2012 (Revers)- Schloss Neuschwanstein.jpg

File:2 Euro Gedenkmünze 2012 (Revers)- Schloss Neuschwanstein.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hammersoft (talk) 01:11, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Freistemplung Deutsche Post 15.11.2011 (Frankit) vom Bayerischen Landtag.jpg

File:Freistemplung Deutsche Post 15.11.2011 (Frankit) vom Bayerischen Landtag.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

De728631 (talk) 20:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Arts

Hallo Mattes, ich bin interessiert an dem Projekt und brauche auch beim Sortieren der Art Kategorien Unterstützung, weil ich noch nicht so viel Erfahrung habe, die vielen Schleifen herauszubekommen. Wie integriert man denn die Kategorie "works"? zB sehe ich mir gerade Category:8th-century BC works an. Um die Schleife von Category:8th-century BC pottery (13C) herauszunehmen würde ich gerne Category:8th-century BC art auflösen. Kannst Du mir weiterhelfen oder hast Du einen Tip. DankeOursana (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC).

Hallo Oursana, das ist einfach :-)

Die Category:Art works ist die Oberkategorie, darin sind u.a. Works by artist‎ (17 C), Works by continent‎ (1 C), Works by country‎ (22 C) und Works by date‎ (9 C) eingehängt. Grafik: http://toolserver.org/~dapete/catgraph/graph.php?wiki=commons&lang=de&cat=8th-century+BC+art&d=0&n=0&format=png&links=0&sub=1

Deine Frage "Wie integriert man denn die Kategorie "works"?" ist mir etwas unklar... Beste Grüße, --Mattes (talk) 06:59, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Mattes, ganz herzlichen Dank. Meine 1. Frage hast Du mir super geklärt. Oberkategorie von Category:Art works ist Category:Art. Aber es gibt unendliche Wiederholungen. Nicht umsonst ist das Überarbeitungsbanner auf der Seite. 1. Category:8th-century BC works sieht so aus: [−] 8th-century BC works‎ (4 C, 6 F) [×] 740s BC works‎ (2 F) [+] 8th-century BC architecture‎ (2 C, 5 F)

[−] 8th-century BC art‎ (2 C, 12 F)
  [+] 8th-century BC sculptures‎ (2 C, 1 F)
  [+] 8th-century BC pottery‎ (13 C, 57 F)

[+] 8th-century BC pottery‎ (13 C, 57 F). Diese wiederholte Unterkategorie werde ich löschen, oder?

2. art by date ist 4.Unterkategorie zu Category:Art aber auch Unterkategorie zu Unterkategorie Category:Art works ??Geht das nicht ohne diese vielen Wiederholungen?

[+] Art by Wikipedians‎ (1 C, 42 F)

[−] Art works‎ (31 C, 1 P, 468 F)

 [+] Works by artist‎ (17 C)
 [+] Works by continent‎ (1 C)
 [+] Works by country‎ (22 C)
 [−] Works by date‎ (9 C)
  [+] Works by century‎ (66 C)
  [+] Works by decade‎ (192 C, 4 P)
  [+] Works by millennium‎ (22 C)
  [+] Works by year‎ (1058 C, 3 P)
  [+] Works by continent by date‎ (2 C)
  [+] Works by country by date‎ (20 C)
  [+] Art by date‎ (10 C)
  [+] Buildings by date‎ (9 C)
  [+] Illustrations by date‎ (2 C)

3. [−] Art by movement‎ (39 C, 5 F)

[−] Design by movement‎ (7 C)
 [−] Furniture by movement‎ (7 C)
   [+] Art Nouveau furniture‎ (3 C, 19 F)
   [×] Biedermeier furniture‎ (25 F)
   [×] Directoire furniture‎ (29 F)
   [+] Empire furniture‎ (1 C, 1 P, 90 F)
   [+] Historicist furniture‎ (1 C, 8 F)
   [+] Rococo furniture‎ (1 C, 25 F)
   [+] Shaker Furniture‎ (2 C, 42 F)

Bis auf Shaker u Art noveau (?) Furniture, sind es doch alles keine Bewegungen sondern zeitliche Perioden, so wie Barock, Renaissance......?

4. [−] Art by movement‎ (39 C, 5 F)

 [−] Design by movement‎ (7 C)
  [+] Furniture by movement‎ (7 C)
  [−] Art Deco‎ (12 C, 2 P, 1 F)
    [−] Art Deco by country‎ (24 C)
     [−] Art Deco architecture by country‎ (40 C)
       [−] Art Deco architecture by country‎ (40 C)
          [+] Art Deco architecture in Argentina‎ (5 C, 74 F)
          [+] Art Deco architecture in Australia‎ (15 C, 44 F)

..

          [×] Art Deco architecture in Vietnam‎ (1 F)
       [−] Art Deco in Argentina‎ (1 C)
          [+] Art Deco architecture in Argentina‎ (5 C, 74 F) . Auch diese beiden letzten Einträge möchte ich entfernen w Wdh

Grüße Oursana (talk) 23:45, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Danke für die Hinweise, das Kudddelmuddel ist leider normal bei Commons, weil so wenige Leute mitarbeiten resp. zuviele Daten vorhanden sind.

(1) Category:8th-century BC pottery‎, Category:8th-century BC art und Category:8th-century BC works repariert

(2) Category:Works by date repariert

(3) Category:Furniture by historical period, Zuordnungen geä.

(4) Category:Art Deco in Argentina repariert

(5) Die Hilfeseite ist Commons:Kategorien. Es ist unpraktisch, dass die Kategorien in englischer Sprache gehalten sind. In ein paar Jahrzehnten sieht es vielleicht anders aus :-) --Mattes (talk) 08:12, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:Works by date

Hallo Mattes,

ich glaube Deine Umsortierung ist nicht gut. Es passt nicht in Category:Events by date, da findet es niemand. Man kann es doch einfach in Category:Categories by date 1 x lassen, in gleicher Ebene wie Category:Art by date und aus Category:Events by date nehmen, braucht man die dann noch? Wichtig ist, dass aus Category:Works by date Category:Art by date als Unterkategorie herausgenommen wird.

Übrigens die ganz große Schleife ist schon bei Category:Categories by time:

[+] Categories by age‎ (9 K)

[+] Categories by century‎ (29 K)

[−] Categories by date‎ (33 K)

     [+] Categories by century‎ (29 K)

Freue mich von Dir zu hören und meine Rückfrage nimmst Du mir bitte nicht übel.Oursana (talk) 17:23, 14 May 2012 (UTC) P.S. Category:Art works war vielleicht doch nicht schlecht, eine Kat. in Category:Art ist auch sinnvoll????Oursana (talk) 17:31, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Man bräuchte evtl. Category:Art works by time statt Category:Art by date. Category:Art works mit Event-Zuordnung ist nicht komplett verkehrt, was nicht heißt, dass das perfekt ist. Category:Events by date und Category:Events müßte mal definiert werden. Ich hatte vor Jahren schon mal so eine Diskussion bei WP (de:Kategorie:Ereignis war 3 x Löschkandidat, nun rot) ...

Übrigens: sofern Du es Dir und dem Projekt gegenüber verantworten kannst, brauchst du nicht um Erlaubnis zu fragen - oder bist Du Dir nur unsicher? Für den großen Bereich Kategorien gibt es hier sicherlich versiertere Mitarbeiter als mich ... Um eine größere Zahl an Meinungen einzuholen, empfielt es sich, die Kategorie-Diskussionen oder das Commons:Forum zu nutzen. --Mattes (talk) 18:30, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Damenschuh mit Fischschuppen-Optik.JPG

Hi Mattes,

es ist möglich, dass meine Anfrage etwas unkonventionell ist. Sollte dem so sein, entschuldige das bitte. Es geht um das Bild "Damenschuh mit Fischschuppen-Optik.JPG" (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Damenschuh_mit_Fischschuppen-Optik.JPG) bzw. die Schuhe selbst. Habe das Bild gesehen und bin völlig fasziniert von den Schuhen. Muss sie unbedingt meiner Freundin kaufen, sofern es sie noch gibt. Leider habe ich sie im Internet auch nach ewiger Suche absolut nicht (mehr) finden können. Gibt es eine Chance, dass Du noch weißt, wie der Hersteller heißt? Ich würde mich wirklich sehr freuen. Vielleicht finde ich sie dann doch noch irgendwo. Sorry nochmal für die egoistische Anfrage.

Ich danke Dir schon jetzt,

Niklas

Hallo, kein Problem. Die Schuhe habe ich beim Kaufhof in München (Marienplatz oder Stachus) gesehen (vor 4 Jahren). Den Hersteller weiß ich leider nicht, die Verkäufer dort können sich aber bestimmt erinnern. --Mattes (talk) 08:43, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

danke, werde mich drum bemühen!

Schönes Wochenende,

Niklas

File:Et selskab af danske kunstnere i Rom.jpg

Please don't be in such a hurry! I am working on the file. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 18:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

OK --Mattes (talk) 19:08, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Using one of your pictures in a textbook

I am thinking of using one of your picture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Triclinium_-_Archäologische_Staatssammlung_München.JPG) in a textbook. It would show at about 5 cm high and be credited in the legend immediately below. Since this is print, and I can't hyperlink to your picture or user page, I was wondering if you would like to show any information in the credits instead of/other than 'Wikimedia:User:Mattes' --such as name, location, any URL, whatever. Just in case, I can be contacted at thechabon aaa ttt hotm ail doo t com. [Thanks for sharing that picture, which is perfect for this book.] Iiiiaaaa (talk) 12:06, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm glad to hear this. Citation of "Wikimedia Commons, User:Mattes" is enough. What's the book called? --Mattes (talk) 12:20, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Baaba-Beeba-Buuba.png

File:Baaba-Beeba-Buuba.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:10, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Bozen 1 (177).JPG

File:Bozen 1 (177).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

188.104.122.61 19:09, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletions?

Hello,

Why did you add a speedy deletion category to many paintings, without a reason? [5] Regards, Yann (talk) 09:47, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

bad click, not intended. Don't delete! --Mattes (talk) 09:53, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Formen - Mattes.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Formen - Mattes.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

McZusatz (talk) 09:39, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Category:1575_-_1599_paintings

Category:1575_-_1599_paintings has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 10:27, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Hooters Calendar Girl Melissa Poe.jpg Full Gear Version?

Hallo. Sie haben nicht zufällig ein Bild das auch Socken und Schuhe als Teil der Uniform zeigt? (Im Deutschen Artikel über de:Hooters beschrieben) User:GMLSX

z.B. File:Waitress and patrons at 'Hooters'.jpg --Mattes (talk) 04:33, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Well. I noticed it before. Thinking about how small the thumbnail will be it (guy's legs) may not even be to distracting. --GMLSX (talk) 20:26, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Category:Quadricycles

Quadricycles has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

丁 (talk) 13:52, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Regnault, Henri - Salomé - 1870 - low-res.jpg

File:Regnault, Henri - Salomé - 1870 - low-res.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Shakko (talk) 07:18, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Monolith-Archäologische_Staatssammlung.JPG

Hallo, weißt Du zufällig noch, wo Du die Informationen in der Beschreibung her hast oder weißt Du überhaupt noch mehr zu den Heunensäulen? Ich denke nämlich gerade über eine Veränderung des Artikels de:Heunensäule (disk) nach und es erweist sich als nicht ganz leicht, den Verbleib der anderen Heunensäulen zu rekonstruieren. Vielen Dank, --Marsupium (talk) 23:49, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Halllo Marsupiumi! Die Infos zur Münchner Heunensäule vor dem Haupteingang der Archäologischen Staatssammlung basieren auf der Infotafel am Gebäude neben der Säule. Darauf befinden sich evtl. noch weitere Informationen. Ich kann Sie Dir erst nächstes Jahr abfotografieren, da ich mich b.a.w. in BaWü aufhalte. --Mattes (talk) 07:39, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Bozen 1 (176).JPG

File:Bozen 1 (176).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 16:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Straubing 001 (128).JPG

File:Straubing 001 (128).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 16:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Israel Batch 1 (716).JPG

File:Israel Batch 1 (716).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 16:12, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Israel Batch 3 (178).JPG

File:Israel Batch 3 (178).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 16:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Israel Batch 3 (131).JPG

Template:Copyvionote/layout Vera (talk) 16:15, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Israel Batch 1 (101).JPG

#invoke:Autotranslate Vera (talk) 16:17, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Deutsches Museum Haupthaus - Radarbild.JPG

Template:Copyvionote/layout Vera (talk) 16:24, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Florence - CCTV of Giotto's Bell Tower.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Vera (talk) 16:25, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Bahnanlagen sind kein Spielplatz (Bundespolizei).JPG

Template:Autotranslate Vera (talk) 16:27, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Vera (talk) 16:39, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Bahnanlagen sind kein Spielplatz (Bundespolizei).JPG

Template:Autotranslate Common Good (talk) 17:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Israel Batch 3 (131).JPG

Template:Autotranslate Common Good (talk) 18:00, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Israel Batch 1 (101).JPG

Template:Autotranslate Common Good (talk) 18:01, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Straubing 001 (128).JPG

Template:Autotranslate Túrelio (talk) 18:22, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Israel Batch 3 (178).JPG

Template:Autotranslate FunkMonk (talk) 15:54, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Fences and windows (talk) 19:55, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Paintings by Jacopo Tintoretto in the Academia Galleries (Venice) u andere Sortierung

Soweit ich sehe, wird unterschiedlich sortiert, Richtlinien gibt es nicht. Ich finde die Sortierung nach Entstehungsjahr nur nachrangig sinnvoll, also erst Künstler, Werkname, Museum und dann Jahr. So sind die Bilder in großen Kategorien auch von allen auffindbar, denn gesucht wird meist ein bestimmtes Bild nach Titel zB Mona Lisa. Wer kennt schon das Entstehungsjahr. Auch kommen so gleiche Themen zB Madonnen, Kreuzigungen nebeneinander.Oursana (talk) 23:16, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Die Kategorie wurde von User:MrPanyGoff angelegt. Generell ist die Hinzufügung des Entstehungsjahres in Kunstkategoriennamen nur zur Unterscheidung notwendig (wenn nicht, sollte es weggelassen werden). Commons:Kategorien sagt nichts zu Kuntwerk-Kategorien und Commons:WikiProject_Arts/Manual_of_Style#Piece_of_art_categoriesist noch ausbaufähig.... --Mattes (talk) 09:24, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Danke für den Link, das sieht ja super aus. Wahrscheinlich habe ich bei meinen Änderungen Sorting and (their) order (wer ist their??) und Catsort nicht verstanden, oder meinst du categorizations and their order Du hattest b.File:Jacopo Tintoretto - Solomon and the Queen of Sheba - WGA22651.jpg meinen sortkey Solomon and the Queen of Sheba,1545 zurück zur Jahreszahlangabe verändert. Dann wäre bei Dir entgegen deiner Antwort doch das Jahr vorrangig. Grüße Oursana (talk) 11:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Die Kategorie für Werke eines Künstlers sollte schon zuerst nach dem Jahr geordnet werden. Wenn kein Jahr zur Verfügung steht, wäre der Werkname (idealerweiese in der Originalsprache) als Ordnungskritierum für die Kategorieneinordnung zu verwenden, soweit meine Idealvorstellung.

Ich finde meine selbstgewählte(!) Rolle des Alleinentwicklers für das „Kunstverwaltungsportal“ etwas anstrengend, vor allem wenn andere (z.B. Du) mehr Sachverstand in dem Metier haben. Es ist ein Gratwanderung zwischen „Mensch, der prescht ganz schön vor“ und „die Kunstleute haben keinen Plan“. Daher finde ich es begrüßenswert, dass Du da mitmachst. Ergänzungen, Korrekturen und neue Inhalte kannst Du gerne ohne Rückfragen direkt vor Ort vornehmen. Geht schneller und ist unkomplizierter :-) --Mattes (talk) 16:41, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Danke Mattes, Du stellst Dein Licht grundlos unter den Scheffel.

Bei der Sortierung bin ich nicht Deiner Meinung. Zu diesem Punkt würde ich gerne einen breiteren Konsens haben. Die Dateien sollen von allen gefunden werden. Nehmen wir mona Lisa,da weiß docj keiner das Datum. Vielleicht können wir uns das mal anhand von Beispielen anschauen.

Übrigens bin ich begeistert von dem Projekt Alte Pinakothek. Ich habe da einiges verändert, einiges kommt vielleicht noch. Ich halte mich am liebsten an die websides der Museen.

s.

Ich halte NICHTS von der allgemeinen Sortierung nach Jahren. Die Software müsste das können müssen (nach Vorlagenparamtern sortieren), tut sie aber nicht. Am besten finde ich, wenn die Files nach ihren Namen sortiert sind, und wenn einige etwas ausreißen, kann man sie dann ja in die sonstige Ordnung der Kategorie reinsortierten. Bei der Kunst ist das meist gar kein großes Problem, aber die Sortierung nach Jahren macht die Kategorien oft genug unnötig unübersichtlich. --AndreasPraefcke (Diskussion) 17:53, 9 July 2012 (UTC) Grüsse Oursana (talk) 14:44, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Beim Namen des Kunstwerks müßte man sich dann noch einigen, welchen Titel man hierfür verwendet, wenn der Künstler das Werk nicht zu Lebzeiten betitelt hat. --Mattes (talk) 15:17, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Stimmt; AndreasPraefcke hat schon recht, am besten von selbst, ist aber abhängig von guter Dateibenennung, Problem der Vornamenverwendung.Oursana (talk) 15:34, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

(zum Diskussionsbeitrag von Oursana]], 21 August 2012, 11:44) Mit "categorizations and their order" meinte ich die Abfolge von Kategorienzuordnugnen. Das Thema ist allerdings ziemlich unwichtig (Hauptsache die Künstlerkategorie ist an erster Stelle). --Mattes (talk) 16:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

File:2007 and 2008 Violence in Kenya.jpg

Template:Autotranslate —LX (talk, contribs) 09:14, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Jerusalem

Hallo Mattes, hast du hier http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Israel_Batch_1_(999).JPG auch ein Bild vom Inneren der Kirchenruine "St. Maria der Deutschen" aufgenommen? Da fehlt bei Commons noch was Aussagekräftiges! Gruß --Chris06 (talk) 14:34, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Muß ich mal nachsehen, ich habe noch einige Bilddateien von Israel zu Hause. --Mattes (talk) 17:44, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Copy paste

Ich glaube du hast da aus Versehen zuviel eingefügt. --McZusatz (talk) 21:35, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

ja und das ca. 300 Mal. Liegt an der kleinen Textbox beim Commonist (hätte ich vielleicht auch vor dem Aktivieren überpfüfen sollen) --Mattes (talk) 11:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

User talk:Mattes/Archive 4

Could you please explain...

Please help replace this outdated license

FOP in Italy

"Photographs of signs" categories

File tagging File:BGN LY King David Lounge birdseyeview.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Judas.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Infrared_dog-cropped.jpg

Polski Fiat 126p

Paintings on stamps

Could you please be a bit more careful with your edits?

A mistake?

Renaming requests

German army boots model 2000

Rome 2009

B&W

Interessanter Flickr-Nutzer

Google Earth ???

Favorite files/Sound

Tip: Categorizing images

Russian consulate-general in Munich

Screenshots from "Earthly Delights" with different resolutions

template information missing

Notification about possible deletion

Jan van Kessel

Question about Google Arts Project detail

Contradictory tags: Saying something is public domain and requiring attribution

Notification about possible deletion

pixelio User:Mattes/Projects/Future uploads

Deletion of images of Canadian coins

You are now a image-reviewer!

Permission to use one of your photo for documentary video

Notice regarding to your vote on 2010 POTY election

WGA images

Facing left / facing right

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ct waikiki.jpg

A barnstar for you!

A barnstar for you!

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tiksi-Aerodrom.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Sundial

File tagging File:Deutsches Freimaurermuseum Bayreuth - inventory (279).jpg

Sea Lions and Dolphins in Category:People with fish

Airports are not buildings

Munch?

Nikbot, Lizenz: File:Tegernseer-Platz.nord.JPG

Renaming files for sorting purposes

call delails to 9425021453 sep 2011

File:Old woman with young baby boy.JPG

File:Waschsalon.JPG

WikiProject Arts

File:Damenschuh mit Fischschuppen-Optik.JPG

File:Et selskab af danske kunstnere i Rom.jpg

Using one of your pictures in a textbook

Speedy deletions?

Copyright status: File:Formen - Mattes.JPG

File:Hooters Calendar Girl Melissa Poe.jpg Full Gear Version?

Category:Paintings by Jacopo Tintoretto in the Academia Galleries (Venice) u andere Sortierung

Jerusalem

Copy paste

Navigation menu

Search