User talk:JuTa/Archive 56

给您一个星章！

	勤奋星章
	Thanks for all the diligent works you've done for the community. 維基小霸王 (talk) 14:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of notable people's cats

Hi. Would you mind bringing back the cats Category:Belgin Doruk and Category:Ayhan Işık which were deleted by you? I would like to ask you not to delete empty artist cats; with the passage of time it is more and more probable to find images for those cats. Let away their own images, street signs with their names etc may already be somewhere within this ocean called Commons and we can find them at any time; so no need to delete those cats with a hurry, indeed... Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 14:11, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi, the 2 named cats are back. I've updated the description pages as well. PS: I only delete empty and uncategorized or empty cats for more than 10 months. --JuTa 15:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Statue of Liberty (Mytilene)

Please revive Category:Statue of Liberty (Mytilene). Thx. --E4024 (talk) 01:24, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Remove this text when Category becomes active: Momentarily empty. Preparatory Page as Link goal for the Landing Pages currently built for this year's contest.

Hätte ich diesen Text auch auf Deutsch übersetzen müssen, oder liest Du bei Löschungen so etwas gar nicht? --Wuselig (talk) 11:45, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Das nächste mal verwendest Du besser {{Prospective category}}. Ansonsten solltest auch neue Kategorien kategorisieren. Ich bin da via Special:UncategorizedCategories drüber gestolpert. --JuTa 11:51, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Okay, sorry! --Wuselig (talk) 14:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:தமிழ் இலச்சினைகள், இலச்சினைகள், வள்ளுவர் வள்ளலார் வட்டம்

Hi, We have observed that these categories have been removed. The categories are the name of Cultural group and its coordinator who developed and released in open license. Can you please let me know the reason for this? or can you revert back? -Neechalkaran (talk) 13:35, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Categories here are generally in latin script. The english translations would be Category:Tamil Icons, Category:Icons, Category:Valluvar Vallalar Circle. And please: When you create new categories please find and use suitable parent cats for them. --JuTa 13:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. We will follow the same. -Neechalkaran (talk) 14:13, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Theodore Stephanides

Hello, may I ask why you deleted these five images?

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Theodore_Stephanides_WWII.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Theodore_Stephanides_World_War_One.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Theodore_Stephanides_visiting_Corfu_with_the_BBC_in_1967.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Theodore_Stephanides_in_Corfu,_about_1938.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Theodore_Stephanides_in_Bombay_in_1901.jpg

All these images were taken from this source, and the blog's owner, Catherine Brown, clearly says that "all photos in this post belong to the family; anyone is welcome to reproduce them". (Catherine Brown is married to Theodore Stephanides' grandson, Alexander Mercouris.) Best regards. Taurus Littrow (talk) 08:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Taurus Littrow, belonging the images does not neccessarily mean owning the copyright of the photos. And "reproduce" is not enough, they must be modifyable as well. As the was {{OTRS received}} on the file description pages please ask at Commons:OTRS noticeboard for your case. Perhaps User:Mussklprozz can tell you more who seemed to have worked on it. regards --JuTa 09:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi JuTa, can you please give me the ticket # for convenience? Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:20, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Sure, it was 2020122410007914 at least for the first one. --JuTa 09:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

OK, I asked at Commons:OTRS noticeboard. Frankly, all this OTRS talk is completely new to me. I can contact Catherine Brown if necessary so she could clarify things. Taurus Littrow (talk) 09:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks to both of you. I answered on the OTRS notice board. --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:OGDL v1.0

A deletion request page was categorized into Category:OGDL v1.0 somehow, could you fix it? Thanks. --Larryasou (talk) 11:14, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I cant follow. The cat is empty. --JuTa 11:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

A null edit to Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/07/23 helped. --JuTa 11:26, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Löschungen von Bilder mit hängigem OTRS-Ticket

Hallo JuTa. Am 28. Januar hast du diverse Fotos gelöscht, bei denen das OTRS-Team einen Wartungsbaustein eingefügt hatte, wonach sie am abklären sind, ob die eingegangen Informationen für eine Freigabe genügen. Wird das OTRS-Team diese Fotos wieder hervorholen, wenn sie zum Schluss kommen, dass eine Freigabe in Ordnung ist? Oder wie geht das weiter? Ein Beispiel eines solchen Fotos: File:Theaterfotograf Fred Erismann bei der Arbeit.png --Hadi (talk) 15:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Hadi, da waren die OTRS-Freigaben länger als einen Monat ohne Bestätigung. Solche Fälle können und sollen gelöscht werden. Falls die Freigabe noch bestätigt wird, sorgt OTRS für die Wiederherstellung.´Du kannst auch auf Commons:OTRS noticeboard nachfragen was den das Problem war/ist. PS: Die Ticket Nr. war 2020111910011019. --JuTa 21:45, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Löschen File:Bekannt2.JPG

Ist diese Datei immer noch zu löschen/zu beanstanden? Dieser veröffentliche Aufruf zur Räte-Wahl über über 100 Jahre alt, Urheber unbekannt und daher insgesamt gemeinfrei. Gruß --Fibe101 (talk) 10:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Das ist über 7 Jahre her, und seither besteht sie unbeanstandet. --JuTa 10:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Victoria VV 's Herenelderen

Hi JuTa,

I added a photo yesterday, but wasn't sure about all the copyright options. It's about a football club. The original photographer is unknown, but since the photograph was taken around 1918, I don't think we're able to ask him (or her) anymore.

As far as I know, the original photo is know in posession of the club itself. I'm a member of the management of this club, that is why I thought it would be ok to place it here.

What is the right procedure to use this photograph on Wikipedia?

Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jelto88 (talk • contribs) 13:55, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Jelto88, if the image is free enough for Commons depend of when the author Gilbert Timmermans died. If before 1951 {{PD-old-70}} can be applied. If not, the inage is still copyrighted sand should be deleted from Commons. regards --JuTa 16:57, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Fortunately, he is still alive :-), but he is not the photographer. He is also a memeber of the clubmanagement and wrote a book about the club. He is not the owner of the photograph, he merely featured it in his book. The original owner as of this date is the club. If necessary, I can vouch for the club to give this permission (I am vice-president of the club). Sincerly, Jelto88

That Wouldnt help, we should know the name and life-span of the photographer himself. If the author was intentialy anonymous the the license-template {{Anonymous-EU}} could be used. regards --JuTa 17:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

I'm afraid we don't know who took the picture. This picture was found in a very old archive with no trace whatsoever about the photographer. So it's better to use the license-template {{Anonymous-EU}} then? Jelto88

You can try, thou I'm not 100% convinced. --JuTa 18:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Ok so just to make sure you understood right: - The original picture is currently owned by the club itself. - Gilbert Timmermans is NOT the author of the picture, but of the book he wrote. He freely used the picture with permission of the club. - The original photographer is unknown. - this picture is being used freely by the club on its own website and social media.

I will re-upload it with the

This image (or other media file) is in the public domain because its copyright has expired and its author is anonymous. This applies to the European Union and those countries with a copyright term of 70 years after the work was made available to the public and the author never disclosed their identity. Important: Always mention where the image comes from, as far as possible, and make sure the author never claimed authorship. Note: In Germany and possibly other countries, certain anonymous works published before July 1, 1995 are copyrighted until 70 years after the death of the author. See Übergangsrecht. Please use this template only if the author never claimed authorship or their authorship never became public in any other way. If the work is anonymous or pseudonymous (e.g., published only under a corporate or organization's name), use this template for images published more than 70 years ago. For a work made available to the public in the United Kingdom, please use Template:PD-UK-unknown instead.

tag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jelto88 (talk • contribs) 18:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Please undelete

• Category:Elevador do Lavra at night -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Wrong deletion of Template:Brazil GLAM partnership license

Hello, JuTa. This template is very important to optimize the process of creating a license for a GLAM-Wiki partnership. Maybe there was an misunderstanding on the transclusion of the documentation? Please revert the deletion, thank you. Ederporto (talk) 16:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, its back, but the (expired) OTRS templates in Template:Brazil GLAM partnership license/doc should be fixed. That was the reason I stumbled over it. --JuTa 17:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:NoFoP-Greece

Template:NoFoP-Greece has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Ditto for {{NoFoP-Ukraine}}. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Zirkolu.jpg restored1

I've restored the file, because 1) it was in use, 2) it only had no source because User:Magog the Ogre removed it and 3) it's PD-Shape and wouldn't really need a source anyhow. --rimshot^talk 09:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Thx. --JuTa 11:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I haven't the slightest clue why I did that. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Ah, such things happen. I only gave you a ping, too, because I thought I might be missing something. --rimshot^talk 06:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear JuTa

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Findling von Hüven

Bitte Bilder löschen stoppen, da ich im Begriff die Genehmigungen beizubringen. Die anderen Bilder unter Commons wurden bereits auf diesem Wege vom gleichen Autor genehmigt. --AxelHH (talk) 23:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, da war seit über einem Monat keine Bestätigung von OTRS erkennbar. Solche Bilder können und sollen gelöscht werden. Ggf. bitte unter Commons:OTRS noticeboard nachfragen, die können die Wiederherstellung dann auch anstoßen. Gruß --JuTa 09:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

Hello JuTa,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:Maint:locdec

Hallo JuTa, ich möchte Dich um Hilfe bitten. Nachdem ich einige Bilder hochgeladen hatte, tauchte bei den Bildern plötzlich die Category:Maint:locdec auf. Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, wie es dazu kam. Ich habe diese Category nicht erstellt. Trotzdem befinden sich 4 Bilder darin. Ich kann den Eintrag auch nicht entfernen. Im Voraus sage ich herzlichen Dank. --Elcom.stadler (talk) 15:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Hmm, keine Ahnung, das klingt mir nach irgend einer automatisch hinzugefügten "maintenance" Kategorie. Evtl. mal auf Commons:Forum oder Commons:Village pump fragen. Du hattest sie übrigens letzten April erezugt und ich sie als leer wieder gelöscht. --JuTa 15:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Nachricht. Das vom April habe ich gelesen und mich deshalb an Dich gewandt, weil Du es damals löschen konntest. Auch damals habe ich die Category nicht erstellt. Irgend etwas geistert da herum. --Elcom.stadler (talk) 16:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Ich hab gemarkt, dasss, wenn man {{Object Location dec}} weglässt, die ominöse cat verschwindet. Frag also ggf. mal auf dessen Talk-Page mal nach. Gruß --JuTa 21:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Dein Tipp war die Lösung. In der Zeile Object location waren Tippfehler. Nach der Richtigstellung war die seltsame Categorie auch weg. Vielen Dank für Deine Unterstützung. --Elcom.stadler (talk) 19:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Royal Saudi Air Force (Seal).svg

Ciao,
I added the source(s) of the incorporated work(s).
I apologize for the oversight.
Instead, this file File:Flag of Saudi Arabia (Reverse).svg (according to Saudi flag photos on Wiki-Commons: see related category) is a mistake/false (the reverse of the flag should be identical to the obverse) and in my opinion can be deleted.
Cheers.

(FDRMRZUSA>talk) 12:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC+1)

Thx, I removed the problem tag. --JuTa 20:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

About File:Rana Abughali.jpg

Hello and hope you are fine. could you plz help me with how to resolve the problem so it will not be deleted?Geekperson (talk) 11:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC).

You need to find out the forographer and ask him if he agrees to publish it under a free license of his choice (see Commons:Copyright tags). If he agrees he has to send a confirming mail to the commons support team - see Commons:OTRS. Once you know the mail has been sent, you better place {{subst:OP}} to the file description page to indicate this is in progress. regards --JuTa 11:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for your reply. Frankly, I do not know how to do that and I really upload it from a trustworthy website as I mentionedGeekperson (talk).

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BernatOrtin.png

La imatge prové del web de l'Hemeroteca Digital de la Biblioteca Nacional d'Espanya: http://www.bne.es/es/Catalogos/HemerotecaDigital/. Tot el contingut d'aquesta web està sota llicència CC-BY 4.0 tal com informen en la pàgina d'avís legal: http://www.bne.es/ca/NavegacionRecursiva/Pie/avisoLegal/. Potser el malentès ve del fet que indico que el fotògraf és desconegut, però l'ús de la reproducció de la fotografia és legítim sota les condicions de llicència CC-BY 4.0.

Em sembla que després dels teus comentaris he pogut explicitar millor aquest aspecte a la pàgina https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BernatOrtin.png. Per tant, t'agrairé que si creus que el problema s'ha resolt suprimeixis l'advertiment que amablement has fet, i si et sembla que el problema persisteix t'agrairé que m'indiquis què és el que falta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xrofes (talk • contribs) 11:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Well, a museum normaly does not own the copyright of photos they own, but if the photographer is anonymous and the photo is created in 1923 the license {{Anonymous-EU}} likely applies. I fixed the description page now. regards --JuTa 11:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Statistika návštěv voleb AV 2021.png

Ahoj, tuto statistiku jsem vytvořil pomocí komunitních nástrojů wikiprojektů. Jak snímek obrazovky, kterou jsem zobrazil pomocí komunitních nástrojů olicencovat nevím. Pokud ani ty nevíš, jak to olicencovat, budiž smazáno.--Rosičák (talk) 18:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

OK, I deleted it. --JuTa 20:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:VladimirKackaLetec.jpg

Hi, can you pls indicate what exactly is missing?, did you mean |Source=Own work? Thank you.--Jancimusic (talk) 07:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

You didnt shot this photo yourself and its very liekely not from 2009. Please indicate the source where you got it from and a correct date. Then we can decide if there is a valid license for it. --JuTa 07:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Its comming from family photo album of my wife, I put it on scanner. Can you pls advice how it should be corrected. Thanks a lot.--Jancimusic (talk) 08:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

We need to know when it was made, who shot the photo and his/her lifespan. --JuTa 08:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, photo was made in 1948 by Father of my wife Vladmir Kačka(1930-2003)--Jancimusic (talk) 11:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Is your wife the only heir of her father? --JuTa 20:08, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

No, she got it before he died, so it was his gift to her and not part of his herrittance, thats the law in Slovakia.--Jancimusic (talk) 09:00, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Hmm, getting a paper copy of a photo does not mean getting the copyright of. But she (your wife) can try to update the description page accordingly and use the license template {{PD-heirs}}. --JuTa 10:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, It was changed, hope it is now okey. Is there anything else you would like to correct?--Jancimusic (talk) 14:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi JuTa, so case closed. Than you for help.--Jancimusic (talk) 12:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Missing file

I made some kind of mistake when I was renaming this file:File:Thissa Wewa in Sri Lanka.jpg and it disappeared (from my point of view). I'm very sorry, Krok6kola (talk) 20:25, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

No problem. --JuTa 20:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Bilder gelöscht

zB https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wartin_(Casekow),_Dorfkirche,_Orgel_(3).jpg Das ist ja echt ärgerlich, wenn ich mich recht erinnere, hatte er mir ausdrücklich versichert, die (von mir wie immer vorbereitete) Mail gesendet zu haben, schon vor vielen Wochen. (Genehmigung habe ich natürlich!) Oft dauert das ja ewig. Und überhaupt: wieso kann man die Uploader nicht informieren, wenn dieser Textbaustein "könnte gelöscht werden" (automatisch?) hinzugefügt wird? Da wird man erst benachrichtigt, wenn schon "gelöscht" (naja, wohl eher versteckt) wurde. Zufällig hatte ich das heute morgen noch gesehen. Jetzt haben wieder viele Leute vermeidbare Arbeit.... --Subbass1 (talk) 10:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Wenn eine solche Bestätigung von OTRS mehr als einen Monat nicht geschieht können und sollen die Bilder gelöscht werden. Frag doch bitte auf Commons:OTRS noticeboard nach, was fehlte bzw. warum dies nicht erfolte. Gruß --JuTa 10:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

re:File:Els bibliobusos porten llibres a persones en situació vulnerable (352p 30fps H264-128kbit AAC).webm

Hello, JuTa! Thanks for your message. IMHO, I think it's the same case like c:File:Bibliobús Puigdon es posa en marxa.webm. If you view the video, it is made by a public administration (Diputació de Barcelona) with a public domain license. Therefore in 00:58 appears clearly Public Domain mark. Thanks!--Docosong (talk) 18:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

I dont see a public domain mark there. --JuTa 18:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

The original source in 00:58 at bottom right: [1]--Docosong (talk) 07:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Easy to miss is, but ok. --JuTa 07:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

sorry

I'm not sure of what's the problem, what's missing? --FLAK-ZOSO (talk) 18:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Mainly a valid license template is missing - see Commons:licensing and Commons:Copyright tags. regards --JuTa 01:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Atanas Ivanov.jpg

Hi, you say that File:Atanas Ivanov.jpg is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image" - what do you mean? Where do you see another image within this image, I don't get it? It's just a picture of my grand-father standing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheAlcostar (talk • contribs) 15:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

No, but you didnt shot this image yourself as claimed. We should know who shot it and his/her lifespan to be able to decide if the image is in th e public domain or not (normaly 70 year after the authors death). regards --JuTa 16:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Covenant between William & Mary’s Catholic Student Association and Canterbury, 1977.jpg

Hi, I went through the official process to release the document contained in the image File:Covenant between William & Mary’s Catholic Student Association and Canterbury, 1977.jpg and sent the relevant email. Nobody processed that release and this deletion occurred erroneously. Please advise about how to approach the situation. I was in the position to formally release the document as part of the organization in possession of the copyright and hard-copy when I filed the email. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Well, you didnt created that document yourself as claimed on the description page. The question is: Who designed it and the wrote the text on it. This person is lilely the copyright owner, and this person has to confirm the relase by the process documeted on Commons:OTRS. If allready done, you might like to ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for this case. Next time please indicate the sent releasing mail by adding {{subst:OP}} to the description page. This will prevent the deletion for about a month. regards --JuTa 00:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Ah, that's excellent info. I was not properly informed on the process of appeals. I can see where the reasonable assumptions come from, too. Thank you for the explanation. Cheers. ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Response to provide permission to use AREAi logo on Common

Thank you for your notification. I have forwarded the required evidence permission to use AREAi logo on Common via info-commons@wikimedia.org Maje203 (talk) 14:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Maje203, the copyright holder should send a mail topermissions-commonswikimedia.org - see Commons:OTRS. regards --JuTa 15:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Ok Maje203 (talk) 16:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Droits d'auteur sur les publications de Nicolas ThéobaldMireille Théobald (talk) 17:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Bonsoir, Depuis dimanche dernier, j'erre sur Commons sans comprendre dans quelle case je peux déposer ma déclaration sur l'honneur que je suis bien dépositaire des droits d'auteur sur les publications de mon père Nicolas Théobald, décédé le 10 Mai 1981. Je suis sa fille Mireille Théobald, née le 6 Février 1939 à Obernai (Bas-Rhin), épouse Darmois. Pendant quelques années après son décès, j'ai touché des droits d'auteur des éditeurs des ouvrages de mon père. On m'avertit en plus qu'une tierce personne prétend être l'auteur des fichiers. J'ai déposé successivement 2 fois 3 fichiers sur Commons: Une première série de 3 fichiers: Nicolas Théobald, Aquisextana Irenaei ; Terrasses emboîtées ou étagées, M. Darmois-Théobald et Y. Rangheard ; Thèse de Nicolas Théobald, pl. II, Insectes du Sannoisien du Gard. Comme mon tuteur sur Wikipédia trouvait les fonds de ces photocopies trop gris, j'ai ensuite déposé sur le site de Commons une nouvelle série de photocopies scannées dont le fond était blanc: Terrasses alluviales Fig. 1 et 2, T. emboîtées Fig. 3, T. étagées ; N. THEOBALD, Fig. 4 Fac-similé Pl. II Thèse 1937 ; N. THEOBALD, Fig. 5 Aquisextana Irenaei. Je vous prie d'excuser ma maladresse. Je n'ai pas trouvé moyen de faire une déclaration sur l'honneur de propriété des droits d'auteur sur les fichiers eux-mêmes. Que dois-je faire maintenant? Merci de votre aide.--Mireille Théobald (talk) 17:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Mireille Théobald, please change the source= {{Own}} i.w. {{Self scanned}}. The author should be changed from your yusername to the name and lifespan of your father included a note that you are his daughter. And finally the license should be changed from {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} ti i.e. {{Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs}}. If you did that you can remove the probölem tag. regards. --JuTa 20:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletions

Guten Nachmittag. I noticed you deleted some categories that were empty at the moment with the c2 tag. I'd like you to notice that this reason to delete is linked to empty and (...) obviously unusable, unlikely to be ever meaningfully used (categories). I'd love to know how you can tell a category named XXXX works in YYY or Built in YYY in XXXX is unusable and unlikely to be ever used. When creating (filled) categories, I encountered notices that you already deleted them before. Cleaning is good and necesary, overcleaning is just useless, a loss of time and can even be stupid as some categories will obviously be filled one day. Have a nice day. --Birdie (talk) 11:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

I only delete cats not used for more than 8 months. They can easily be recreated (or undeleletd if you give me a ping). Empty cats are disturbing readers, who opens them in the hope to find content and got disappointed. --JuTa 12:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Restore

Hi! Please restore this category. --Микола Василечко (talk) 06:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --JuTa 06:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:Shanghai_style_restaurants

Shanghai style restaurants has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 11:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Lord Goff young.jpg

Hello JuTa. This is about the file referenced in the title, which you just deleted. Just after I uploaded it, I arranged for the copyright holder to fill out the OTRS release form. I was informed by another user/OTRS volunteer that an email had been received confirming the permissions, but that there was a backlog and they'd take some time to get to it. Was the email not enough? Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 08:06, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, the best will be you ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard cause I have no access to those mails. The Ticketnumber was 2021012610006341. regards --JuTa 11:45, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Rücksetzung

Hallo JuTa! Ist diese Zurücksetzung, weil nicht weiter in die DR geschrieben wurde? Ich habe dutzende Schnelllöschanträge bekommen und nicht die Zeit diese innerhalb von 7 Tagen abzuarbeiten. Da die Bilder definitiv aus Regierungsquellen stammen und nur die URL nachgereicht werden muss, was erfolgen wird, bitte ich um entsprechende Geduld. Angesichts der Schwemme wird das wohl einen Monat dauern. Wenn Du wünschst, kann ich Dich direkt informieren, wenn URLs in einzelnen Bildern eingetragen sind, um den Vorgang dort abzuschließen. Schönen Gruß, --JPF (talk) 12:44, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hallo, wie Du einen vollständigen Löschantrag stellt, findest Du unter Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually. Oder Du aktiviert QuickDelete in Deinen Einstellungen. Dann geht das mit einem Klick. Es fehlte hier die Request-Unterseite und deren Listung auf der entsprechenden Tagesseite. Gruß --JuTa 12:51, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Ich verstehe absolut nicht, was Du meinst. Ich habe die Schaltfläche für den Einspruch geegn Schnelllöschung gedrückt und die Seite erstellt. Man kann ja nicht mal hieredirekt einen Kommentar ergänzen. Die LA von A1Cafel machen durch ihre Zahl eine weitere Bearbeitung auch absolut unmöglich. Das beste wäre, wenn man alle gesammelt in einen LA vereinen und ich dort entsprechend der Abarbeitung den Vollzug melden könnte. So ist das Ganze für mich von der Durchführung unverständlich und in der Übersichtlichkeit ungenügend. Wie gesagt, es geht nur um eine Ergänzung der Informationen. Eine URV liegt hier nicht vor und ist auch nicht zu erwarten. Dem Projekt droht kein Schaden, wenn die Bilder einige Wochen noch keine URL haben.

Übrigens, reicht eine Verlinkung zur Gallery oder muss jedes Bild einzeln verlinkt werden? (muss jetzt wieder zur Redaktionssitzung) --JPF (talk) 12:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Massen-Löschanträge erstellst Du am besten mit Help:VisualFileChange.js/de. Damit kannst Du auch die bisherigen Schnelllöschanträge rausnehmen. Gruß --JuTa 13:04, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

PS: Evtl. hattest Du entsprecheden Tab einfach zu schnell geschlossen? Dann wurde das Script im Hintergrund nicht fertig. --JuTa 13:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: from Ric1967

Hi I have corrected all the files you have indicated to me. Thank you.--Ric1967 (talk) 18:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Well, but now we need a confirmation through Commons:OTRS of their author(s). regards --JuTa 01:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi I provided to help the copyright holder/creator of the pictures (old man) you mentioned. He sent from his e mail all the permission using wikpedia template. Please check. Thank you.--Ric1967

Hi, I cannot check the mail(s), because I not a member of the OTRS team. Please add {{OTRS pending}} to the permission field of the description page, best by using {{subst:OP}}. You can rmove the problem tag then. Thx. --JuTa 21:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Carel Bel

Hello JuTa. You gave me the message that "the source of derivative word is not properly indicated". Could you help me with this? The foto's are from the family archive (from my father and uncle, it concerns their father and mother, my grandfather and grandmother), I got a copy of it. I'm not that familiar with wikipedia. My grandfather and grandmother don't live anymore. I didn't succeed to give the photo's the proper indication, I don't know how to do that. I would appreciate your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MBB1969 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Well, you claimed that the photos are your own work, that means you yourself sot them. This is not true. Please add the true photographer(s) (best including their lifespan)to the authors field, change source to i.e. {{Self scanned}} and the license to i.e. {{Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs}}. regards --JuTa 21:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. I asked my father if he knew the name of the photographer, that was my Grandfather himself (he passed away) or the portret Photographer in de village of my grandfather (passed away). As the portret photo's were bought by my grandfather and has been inhereted by my father, the rights belong to my father / family. I still don't know how to indicate that the right way. Could you tell me how I can change this the right way? Thanks a lot!

Hi MBB1969, I did it for one example - see here. Please at the correct date when the original image was made and the lifespan of your grandfather. And do the same with the other images. --JuTa 00:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ju, thank you very much. I made the corrections, hope I did it right. Thanks a lot! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MBB1969 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Images from Saxony

Hi. I found these files which give rambling guides to paths in Saxony:

Wanderung um Nassau und Frauenstein

On the page here,

• the images can be seen;
• they appear in high resolution when clicked and can be downloaded;
• they are also listed on the page as jpg files.

As far as I can tell, there is no indication of copyright anywhere. I would like to use two images

The village church in Nassau

The Silbermann Organ in the church

Please could you tell me if this is possible?

Thanks in advance, Mathsci (talk) 21:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Generally no, because everything is per default "all right reserved" except otherwise explicit stated. You yould need a release from the author as documented on Commons:OTRS. regards --JuTa 10:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Please delete another photo series of File:Sarita Reth 01.jpg

Please delete another photo series of File:Sarita Reth 02.jpg, File:Sarita Reth 03.jpg & File:Sarita Reth 04.jpg here, as you did before on File:Sarita Reth 01.jpg! I'm not allowing my own photo work to be publicized and spread online, It's against my client privacy.. Please takedown this images before 24 hours!!! Best regards Jeremie Verde Montessuis --180.253.161.49 21:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

• File:Sarita Reth 01.jpg
• File:Sarita Reth 02.jpg
• File:Sarita Reth 03.jpg
• File:Sarita Reth 04.jpg

Hi, I marked the now as "no permission". They will likely get deleted in about a week. --JuTa 10:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Undeletion request regarding File:Stacey Long in West Kowloon 20191026 by Raymond Lo 01.jpg

@JuTa: This file has already been given permission by Ticket:2020101510012054. Would you please restore the file? Regards! Joe FSF (talk) 06:29, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, OTRS release is not confirmed since October last year. Please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard about this case. There is lilely something wrong or still mising. regards --JuTa 10:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

@JuTa: Ganímedes has raised some questions and I have already clarified. You can see the latest talks under the topic "Raymond Lo's files Ticket:2020101510012054" on Commons:OTRS noticeboard#Raymond Lo's files Ticket:2020101510012054. Regards! Joe FSF (talk) 01:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Then Ganímedes should raise an Commons:Undeletion request if he accepts the release. --JuTa 01:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi! No, I won't accept this release and I'll open DR for the other files in the ticket. Thanks a lot. --Ganímedes (talk) 11:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

@Ganímedes: I really don't understand. I have already answered you questions and clarified that two sets of pictures are different. I really don't know what is still missing. Raymond Lo have submitted information to verified himself and have even submitted information to prove he is the copyright owner of his two photos. You have given the permission but suddenly changed your mind saying that they seemed to be screen capture. Please, I really feel helpless here. I really don't know what is still missing. Regards! Joe FSF (talk) 02:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

File:INDEPENDENCE DAY 20191 - Celebration at B. M. Ruia Girls College, Mumbai, 2019.jpg and similar images?

Dear JuTa,

Some interesting historical photographs from a girl's college in Mumbai, India, disappeared in the last weeks from Category:B. M. Ruia Girls' College, Mumbai. You seem to be involved in some way, you know what happened ? Thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 08:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

It was deleted because of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bmrgirls. --JuTa 08:12, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

O, thank you. (I had requested another related undeletion). The disputed image of Independence Day by Bmrgirls is of the same occasion as the video, but is not a part of the video. Independence celebrations are of historical interest. "Out of scope"? only edited by me? The arguments seem moot. We should not be rash in deleting? Can i request undeletion of the images of the category? Thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 08:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Its not only "out of scope", its mainly because likely a copyright violation. The source of the images of the collage was not stated. --JuTa 08:27, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, OK, you're right, that compilation is dubious. But for the other images we should have the assumption of innocence. A photographer could make pictures of the same occasion as the video. Then those other images are legal and should not be deleted. We should not exaggerate the hunt for extreme copyright of innocent school pictures? The uploaders "Bmrgirls" on Commons and "BMRMM SDIMS" on YouTube do not have to be identical/different. So i would give them the benefit of the doubt until protests arise, good Dutch legal practice. Hansmuller (talk) 08:57, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Thats not the practice on commons - see Commons:PRP. --JuTa 08:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Picture of Tannenberg and Schwerin

please excuse the confusion, which was originally caused by the change of the file name by Wikipedia during uploading, resulting in a page where I could not clarify the liscence permission. I added now two lines hoping they make it clear. For clarity: The photo was taken by my father (Wilhelm Fricke) 1940 in Cherbourg. It was a color slide handed over to me, so I have the copyright. I scanned the color slide and removed dirt and restored the colors.--Wolfgang Fricke (talk) 10:03, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, dann solttest Du bei "source" besser {{Self scanned}}, bei "author" den Namen und die Lebensdaten Deines Vaters und die Lizenz durch z.B. {{Cc-by-sa-3.0-heirs}} ersetzen. So ist es jedenfalls äußerst unglaubwürdig, dass Du das Photo 1940 selbst geschossen hast. Gruß --JuTa 10:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

archive.org

Hi! Can I upload this book ([2]) from archive.org ? or it's copyrighted?--Eru Rōraito (talk) 21:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Publicated in 1524. Thats likely {{PD-old-100-1923}}. regards --JuTa 21:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Restore

Hello JuTa, I hope you're doing well. I'm working on a disambiguation page of Kapil Sharma. Their are 2 commons page Category:Kapil Sharma (actor), Category:Kapil Sharma (comedian). Can you restore the Category:Kapil Sharma. Thanks for your consideration. --C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 05:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

No, it was about the actor. Please create the disabig as desired. --JuTa 11:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Wie kann ich diese Karte bearbeiten?

Sie ist nicht mehr aktuell: Marko8726 (talk) 09:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Ja. --JuTa 11:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Sie haben wohl meine Frage nicht verstanden, wie kann ich die Karte bearbeiten? Oder wissen Sie es auch nicht? Marko8726 (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Keine Ahnung, hilft evtl Help:SVG oder frag auf Commons:Forum oder Commons:Village pump. --JuTa 22:03, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Hassan Maatouk with a fan 2019.jpg

I've been told here that the correct thing to do is to overwrite the original file. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 14:53, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Hmm, normaly such "3rd party" overwrites gets quickly reverted. And the current situation does not realy help for your privavy issue. Anybody can access the file description page, pick out the old version and reuse it according the given license. --JuTa 16:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

...and you crop is not only a crop, but a mirror too, which is a distortion for a person portrait. --JuTa 16:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

The point is: when asking a person who took a selfie to upload it to commons, what should I do? Because if they crop it themselves, the metadata might be removed and it may look like the image was taken from the internet. If I create a derivative version of the original, and delete the original, then that might also cause some issues. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 01:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

So: the original image is a selfie of User:Maroun1899? Why you investigating privacy issues for him and not he himself? It looks to me that he has no privacy problems... --JuTa 07:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Maroun is my friend. I asked him personally to upload it, and he did. He then saw his selfie on google one day when searching for "Hassan Maatouk", and asked me if there was any way to remove it.

Say that, from the beginning, I ask someone to upload a selfie and he tells me "ok but I don't want my face on Wikipedia". What's the correct procedure? Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 17:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

The image should get cropped before uploading it. --JuTa 22:49, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Which often times results in the metadata being deleted if done through an external software like photoshop. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 16:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Authorship could be confirmed through Commons:OTRS. --JuTa 21:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 23:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Copyright calim for Hungaryan state issued coins?

Hello JuTa, I hope you're doing well. I can see that you deleted most of the pictures from the Hungaryan Forint coins. For example these files: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:50_Ft_1992.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:50_Ft_1992_b.jpg

These files were used in this highlighted article: https://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_magyar_forint_p%C3%A9nz%C3%A9rm%C3%A9i&action=history

Can you explain what was the legal basis with the removal of those pictures? As I understand, the copyright owner is the Hungaryan National Bank ( MNB in short ) in the case of Hungaryan State issued Forint coins. The MNB gives a general authorization by Law for online publication of the pictures of the Forint coins.

The MNB states that there is no need for special authorisation for imitation of forint coins made available by electronic means, on a website, by wired or wireless means. In Hungaryan: "elektronikus eszköz útján, internetes honlapon, vezetékes vagy vezeték nélküli eszközzel hozzáférhetővé tett forintérme-utánzathoz." Source: https://www.mnb.hu/bankjegy-es-erme/informaciok-a-penzutanzatok-keszitesevel-kapcsolatban/mnb-engedelye-nelkul-keszitheto-forinterme-utanzat

Further more "(4) Without the permission of the MNB, a forint coin may be made as an illustration on a paper and other non-metallic raw material, as well as on a forint coin made available by electronic means, on a website, by wire or wireless means." In Hungaryan: "(4) Az MNB engedélye nélkül készíthető a forintérme-utánzat illusztrációként papír és egyéb nem fém alapanyagon, valamint az elektronikus eszköz útján, internetes honlapon, vezetékes vagy vezeték nélküli eszközzel hozzáférhetővé tett forintérme-utánzat." Source: https://www.mnb.hu/letoltes/7-2021-mnbrendelet-ermeutanzat-hatalyos-2021-04-01-tol.pdf

I can understand that you dont speak Hungaryan. It isn't an international language. What I can not understand is that what is the basis of your decision if you can not understand Hungaryan Law becaouse of language barriers? Please help me how to avoid similar situations in the future in the case of pictures from Forint coins. What is the proper place / way for discussion issues of this legal matter?

Nomine capta est (talk) 16:04, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Nomine capta est. There was an unconfirmed so called OTRS for more than a month in progress. The Ticket ID was 2021010710008643. Please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for the details and reasons that the release dodnt got confirmed. --JuTa 16:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi JuTa I will do that. Thank you! Nomine capta est (talk) 16:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Andrea Maraventano

Hi. I am a bit confused about how to fix the license. The photo was sent to me by the writer portrayed. He told me it was shot by his brother-in-law some years back. It is in the public domain as it is used in his LinkedIn profile and also was used when he appeared in a broadcast on the National Italian television. --Giona LoRe (talk) 12:22, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Then hs brother in law has to confirm that the image is public domain by sending a mail to the commons support team - see Commons:OTRS. regards --JuTa 15:16, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi. I uploaded two pics I took today. I hope I did it right this time. Thanks a lot for your patience and support. --Giona LoRe (talk) 14:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Axiom2.png

File:Axiom2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

W_I^KImaniac 18:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

File:27u.png

File:27u.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

W_I^KImaniac 18:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

File:26u.png

File:26u.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

W_I^KImaniac 18:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for cleaning up the mess with the Guam images. I don't know why Flickr2Commons let me upload them, but I appreciate you sorting out the mess. - Featous (talk) 20:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

You are wellcome :) --JuTa 23:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

File:11 07 029 R 自衛隊記念日 観閲式(Parade of Self-Defense Force) 52.jpg

File:11 07 029 R 自衛隊記念日 観閲式(Parade of Self-Defense Force) 52.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Not needed) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Ominae.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 03:41, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Deleted File

Good Evening JuTa, I am sending you this message to apologize for using the uploader without knowing the licenses of the files I uploaded since I am new to wikimedia commons. you can freely delete the file. Best regards --Lorypigghy97 (talk) 07:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Cat

Hi. Can you bring back Category:Villages in Ankara Province please? Thx. --E4024 (talk) 01:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done --JuTa 01:24, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

File:G338-路线图.svg

Please can you cancel this unfair "redirect to duplicated file", and try to find original file and restore it? Because G338 isn't really a duplicate with G307, the G307 runs from Huanghua, Hebei Province to Shandan County of Zhangye, Gansu Province, where G338 runs from Haixing County of Hebei to Tianjun County in Qinghai, both are different highways. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Ditto for File:G358-路线图.svg. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:33, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

They were binary identical. I could removed the redirect, but then you have to upload new differnent images. --JuTa 13:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Deleting media that *have* all the required permissions for use on Wikipedia

Hello!

You have already deleted a photo that had an explicit permission for use on Wikipedia.

You are now threatening to delete another one - again, a photo that has an explicit permission from the holder of the rights published on its info page. I believe that you might be confused because the permission is not in a language you understand, but this can hardly be a reason for deleting.

Please refrain from such zealous performative "cleaning" and try to gather as much information as you can *before* you act.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by B15563T5 (talk • contribs) 10:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi B15563T5. The image does not need a permission to use on wikipedia, but a permission for anybody in the world for any purpose, including commercial ones. The copyright holder has to confirm an accepted free license of his choice by sending a mail to the commons supportteam - see Commons:Licensing and Commons:OTRS. Once you know he did that you should add [[subst:OP}} to the files description page. --JuTa 10:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

The mail is sent, the code is added. Now is it possible to assign another, less zealous and more nuanced editor to deal with files I upload? — Preceding unsigned comment added by B15563T5 (talk • contribs) 10:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Where did you added the code? I cant find any edits of you on files description pages today. And no, there is nobody asigned here for anything. This is a project of volounteers. --JuTa 13:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

File:MediaWiki-2020-logo-(black).svg

Hi, this file was used in MediaWiki logo guidelines page with correct filename, description, licenses and categories. Сan you please restore it, and instead remove an old one File:Mediawiki logo proposal (dark translucent, capitalised).svg? Thanks. Serhio Magpie (talk) 22:56, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --JuTa 02:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

HIDDENCAT

Hi, I saw that you pushed it as an hidden cat, however I did not that because I don't want to flood "Media needing categories...", I will categorize the files that I uploaded, so I removed "HIDDENCAT". Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 16:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Question regarding copyvios

Can you get blocked for recviving more than three copyvios at once? SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 10:54, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

If you talk about uploading: yes. --JuTa 10:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Okay because I stumbled upon logos from Albanian universities that were uploaded 4 years ago and recently, it has be tagged as copyvio just recently. Around the same year, that user (who I am talking about) had uploaded Albanian football logos in the past which were deleted possibly because of copyright. I am asking this because the user in question got more than three copyvios recently. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 11:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

You can request block ofa user i.e. on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. --JuTa 03:04, 22 March 2021 (UTC)