User talk:JuTa/Archive 15

File:France-Football-Barnstar.jpg

Why? [1] I have created the image from other free image of commons. Xaris333 (talk) 17:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Because there is no license template within the file description - compare Commons:Licensing. If you used other free images pls put the license templates of the souce pages onto the description page of your image. regards. --JuTa 17:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Ready. Xaris333 (talk) 18:55, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Fine :) I removed the problem tag. --JuTa 18:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Schematic_diagram_of_the_human_eye_en.svg

Namaste,

Mistakenly i saved the edited version of the picture that i wanted to use in sanskrit wiki articles. Thanks for the revert. Could you also suggest how to save/upload it in a different name? Thanks again - SumanaKoundinya (talk) 14:39, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, you could use i.e. this tool or any other suitable link on the upload page. Choose a non exitsing new filename, link back as "source" to the souce image an choose the same licens(s) as the source image. regards. --JuTa 18:58, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

File deletion?

Hi JuTa,

I uploaded some files and you deleted them because of copyright issues. File:James Baker at the Gulen Institute.png This picture is available online at the institution's website and there is no copyright for it. What should I do? Do I need to get permission from the institute to upload this (and other similar pictures)?

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdchram (talk • contribs) 2013-08-21T21:51:33‎ (UTC)

Hi, when there is no license marked on a website that mean "all right reserved, no copy allowed". Try to find the fotografer i.e. though the websites contact page and ask if he is willing to release the fotos under a free license - {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} is recommanded. If he agrees he has to send a releasing mail to the commons support team - for details see Commons:OTRS. If everything checks out ok, the files will be undeleted. regards. --JuTa 22:02, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Regarding File:R4bia 0 1.png

Hi JuTa, as you can see on the linked website (http://r4bia.com), the whole content of the website is licence free. As you can read there:

All texts, videos and photographs published on r4bia.com can be freely used in newpapers, magaines, tv networks, social networks and internet sites.

What if I'd upload the file again and define it as own work.. would it be okay then?. Greetings --Supermohi (talk) 10:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

just wrote de:Rābiʿa-Zeichen, without the picture it won't be the same.. :) --Supermohi (talk) 10:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi , I'm afraid but even that statement soun not free enough to keep it on commons. The image has be useable by anybody for any purpose, i.e. print it on T-shirts and sell them. And reuploading it and declaring as own work would be a Commons:copyfraud. Please don't do that. --JuTa 10:54, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

JuTa the problem is: nobody knows who the creater or copryright holder is. Is there any solution? --Supermohi (talk) 11:15, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Well, you could try to contact the owner of the website (mailto:info@r4bia.com at the bottom of their main page) and ask them if they are the copyright holders and are willing to release this under a free license - {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} is recommanded. If they agree they have to send an email to the commons support team - for details see Commons:OTRS. Once the mail is sent you better put the template {{OTRS pending}} onto the decription page, which will prevent deletion for about 30 days or until the case will be decided as valid or invalid. regards. --JuTa 11:22, 22 August 2013 (UTC) PS: Ich spreche deutsch :)

cool, dann brauch ich mich nicht so anstrengen;-) Die eMail habe ich weggeschickt:

Hello my dear friends,

as-salamo 3laykom wa rahmatollah!

I just wrote an article about the Rabi'a emblem (the hand with the four fingers) on Wikipedia. If you are the copyright holders of this emblem, would you please send an eMail to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org containing your agreement to use it under the cc-by-sa-3.0 free license. Thank you very much!

Greetings

Your brother in Islam.

Darf ich die Datei jetzt wieder hochladen? --Supermohi (talk) 16:51, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Ging sowieso nicht, hab's mit dem Hinweis auf die ausstehende Anfrage bei de:wp hochgeladen. Grüße --Supermohi (talk) 17:31, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Auf de: hast Du auch deutlich bessere Chancen dass das als de:Vorlage:Bild-LogoSH o.ä. auch ohne Freigabe durch den Urheber durchgeht. Gruß --JuTa 19:26, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Vielen Dank, damit hast Du mir sehr weitergeholfen :) Hab's bereits eingebaut. Grüße und einen schönen Abend --Supermohi (talk) 19:48, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Re: no license tags

Hello, JuTa. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

thx. --JuTa 19:50, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Questioned licenses

File:Gotaverken-flyg.jpg and File:B C Rodhe.jpg that you have questioned, now have the appropriate license {{PD-Sweden-photo}} added. Cheers //--Bulver (talk) 19:44, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Thx, would you pls. add a source and author for File:Gotaverken-flyg.jpg. regards. --JuTa 19:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Buslov F E.tif

Hello, What's the problem with the file. it was published in 1906, more then 100 years ago. Hunu (talk) 09:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, the problem is that there is no license template on the decription page - compare Commons:Licensing an Commons:Copyright tags. A possible license tag woul be {{PD-old}}. But its not clear if this applies, because the author has to be died before 1943 for this. As the image has been taken 1906 a i.e. 20 year old person would be 56 year old in 1943 and could have lived easily another 20 years or more, which would make the image still copyrighted in most countries. regards. --JuTa 09:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Chabaud-Napoléon III.jpg

Bonjour et excusez moi car je ne parle ni l'allemand ni l'anglais, La médaille date de 1861 et a donc plus de cent cinquante ans. Si vous considérez que cette oeuvre est en trois dimensions elle doit être supprimée. En revanche, et je pense qu'il en est ainsi, si on considère qu'il s'agit d'une oeuvre en deux dimensions (comme par exemple un tableau), elle doit être conservée.Robert Valette (talk) 09:26, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I just had a scond look at Commons:Currency which explicitly states:

Attention: a photograph of a coin has two requirements before it can be included. The first is that the design of the coin itself is not copyrighted, or permission has been obtained. The second is that the photographer agrees to license it under a free licence. A picture of a 3D-object creates in most jurisdictions a new copyright on the picture, something that is not the case when photographing pure 2D-objects

So, yes the coin itself is PD-old but the fotografer has to release the foto of under a free license. As the foto is not made by you you cannot release it unter the CC-license which currently on the description page. regards. --JuTa 09:35, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Il ne s'agit pas d'une pièce de monnaie, mais d'une médaille commémorative. Je pense qu'elle peut être conserve.Robert Valette (talk) 22:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

If it is money or a medal does not chance the 3D-character of the image. --JuTa 22:12, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Thomasville Municipal Building (North corner).jpg

One of your templates said to add PD-self so I did then the next said to add the template own so I did. I took this photo. It is my personal upload. --Mjrmtg (talk) 21:33, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

OK, I fixed that now. Compare the file history. --JuTa 21:57, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. After I uploaded the file, I did a rename (move) request. When they renamed it, the photo lost all information including categories and license information. --Mjrmtg (talk) 22:25, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Pre-1801 Union Flag at Fort York, Toronto.JPG

hello:

i am the copyright owner of the photo of the pre-1801 british flag being flown in Toronto, Canada. I made it clear that I was releasing the image into the public domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.118.15.230 (talk • contribs) 2013-08-26T22:19:12‎ (UTC)

Yes, but please log in as User:5v9 and confirm this. thx. --JuTa 22:43, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Séjourné.jpg

Hello JuTa, I've just got your message about the file I uploaded. I'm new here, and as I couldn't find a way to say that I had obtained the authorisation from the photographer, so I uploaded the photo, and made the photographer send his authorisation form at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org If this way doesn't work, please tell me how I should proceed, and I'll follow your advice. Thank you for your help, --Escrivendi (talk) 12:16, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, that way was perfectly OK. It was just not docuemtented on the file description page. A license template is also missing there. I now changed the problem tag to {{OTRS pending}} which prevents deletion of the file for about 30 days or until the case get closed as valid or invalid. If you know which license the autor likes to publish this image, it would be good when you replace the {{Remove this line and insert a license instead}} part with the license of his choise. {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} is the recomanded one according Commons:OTRS. And please be patient, OTRS-stuff is normaly very busy, it could take weeks until the case will be closed. regards. --JuTa 15:34, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Isofts-kiev-ua-archive.jpg

Hi JuTa,

confirmation letter was sent to permissions-commons on August 21. It contained previous version of the image in attachment.

Then on August 22 I uploaded recompressed version. (I did so before reading your talk page.)

Do we need to do something? (Either Mr. Andon to send the letter again, with recompressed image in attachment, or you to delete the current version and restore previous one.) It may be needed if processing of confirmation letters requires binary equivalence of files.

Thank you! --Ncpie (talk) 12:21, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, no other actions are required. Just wait for answerback with perhaps addional questions from OTRS-Team or a final OK from them. And please be patient as OTRS-stuff is normaly very busy. It can take weeks until a case gets finaly decided. regards. --JuTa 15:40, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Helsingborgs IF logo

Hi, I was wondering why I can't upload the logo of Helsingborgs IF? Djurgårdens IF has their logo uploaded here? Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schappe (talk • contribs) 2013-08-29T16:09:31‎ (UTC)

Hi, the image exceeded the so called Threshold of originalaty. If you need it on english wikipedia you might upload it under so called fair use - compare Commons:Fair use and en:Wikipedia:Fair use. About the ruls in th swedish or other language wikipedia I don't know. regards. --JuTa 19:13, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Giglia Tedesco Tatò

Hi, I didn't know how licesing this file File:Giglia_Tedesco_Tatò_(_scheda_del_Senato).jpg. I've found it on the website of the Italian Senate (www.senato.it) where I found this disclaimer ([2]) sorry only in Italian:

"... L'utilizzo, la riproduzione, l'estrazione di copia, ovvero la distribuzione delle informazioni testuali e degli elementi multimediali disponibili sul sito del Senato è autorizzata esclusivamente nei limiti in cui la stessa avvenga nel rispetto dell'interesse pubblico all'informazione, per finalità non commerciali, garantendo l'integrità degli elementi riprodotti e mediante indicazione della fonte. ..."

(draft traslation: The use, reproduction, extraction of copying, or distribution of textual and multimedia elements available on the website of the Senate is authorized only to the extent that the same is done in compliance of the public to information, for purposes non-commercial, ensuring the integrity of the reproduced elements and by indicating the source.)

If it dosn't fit wikipedia rules I agree the deletion of the file. Bye --Giu Pepis (talk) 07:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

I updated the license it would be in the Public Domain in Italy becouse shot before 1992. Bye --Giu Pepis (talk) 08:16, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, the license you applied seems to be OK. Thou the conitions you quotes would be not OK, because every image on commons needs to be reuseable even commecialy. But I'll remove the poblem tag now. regards --JuTa 11:34, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Nyaung Shwe C 2 (1961).jpg

{{OTRS|2013081010006025 --- Haubi (talk) 06:53, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Was möchtest Du mir mit dieser Mitteilung sagen? --JuTa 10:52, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Egerland1322-1806 RegBez Eger1939-1945.gif

Every line of that graphic had been drawn by myself. Therefore it was no violation of copyright, and the deletion of this graphic was a kind of vandalism.--Ulamm (talk) 09:35, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

• Den von dir verlinkten Funktionsseiten kann ich keine Frist zwischen Löschantrag und Löschung entnehmen.
• Sofern überhaupt eine Löschdiskussion stattgefunden hat, hätte ich von der Eröffnung der Diskussion informiert werden müssen, nicht erst von der Löschung.
• Den von dir verlinkten Seiten ist nicht zu entnehmen, wessen Rechte ich mit der Erstellung der Grafik verletzt haben soll.

--Ulamm (talk) 10:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Nunja, das Quellbild File:Egerland1322-1806 RegbezEger1939-1945.gif wurde wegen copyright violation gelöscht. Und auch dessen Quell-Bild cs:Soubor:Protektorát Čechy a Morava - Sudety.jpg wurde gelöscht. Wenn google translate recht hat wohl wegen "fair use".

• Die Löschfrist beträgt in der Regel 1 Woche.
• Du wurdest von mir am 21.8. über den Löschantrag informiert. Der befindet sich übrigens hier und ist in meiner Mitteilung verlinkt. Gelöscht wurde es dann am 28.8., also eine Woche später, übrigens (natürlich) nicht von mir.
• Die Bilder (vor allem das Quellbild) sehen nicht wirklich komplett selbst gemacht aus, sondern eher aus einem Atlas oder sonstigem Kartenwerk kopiert oder zumindest adaptiert aus. Damit würde "dervative work" zutreffen. Dann müsste man den ursprünglichen Kartenautor kennen um anhand seiner Lebendaten entscheiden zu können ob die Ursprungsquelle mittlerweile gemeinfrei ist oder nicht.

Du kannst gerne versuchen einen Wiederherstellungsantrag zu stellen - das geht auf Commons:Undeletion requests. Ggf. wäre es auch hilfreich deine komplette eigene Urheberschaft (sofern diese gegeben ist) mit einer Mail an das Support-Team - siehe Commons:OTRS - zu bestätigen. Gruß --JuTa 11:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Es gibt bei Zeichnungen ein Copyright für eine Darstellung, aber nicht für den Inhalt der Darstellung. Wenn man Grenzen, Flüsse und andere geografische Linien so zeichnet, dass der Zeichnung verschiedene Quellen zugrunde liegen könnten, ist man der Urheber der Zeichnung. Alle renommierten Kartenverlage zeichnen in dieser Weise amtliche Landesaufnahmen ab, ohne dafür Lizenzgebühr zu zahlen oder die amtliche Grundlage im Impressum zu erwähnen. Wenn man dagegen eine Karte ablichtet oder als Datensatz kopiert und nur mit eigenen Ergänzungen versieht, braucht man natürlich einen Lizenzvertrag und muss eine Lizenzgebühr zahlen.--Ulamm (talk) 15:17, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Soubor:Protektorát Čechy a Morava - Sudety.jpg war wohl eine Abllichtung, meine Karte dagegen nicht,--Ulamm (talk) 15:19, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Wie gesagt: Versuch es auf Commons:Undeletion requests. Gruß --JuTa 15:21, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

• Erneut hochladen ging schneller.
• Dabei habe ich die Flächen der Stadtkreise, die ich eigentlich auch in der vorigen Version selbst gezeichnet hatte, die aber wie kopiert aussahen, durch schematische Signaturen ersetzt.--Ulamm (talk) 15:56, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Re: File:New Okinawa Prefectural Museum.jpg

Hello. Thank you for your efforts here on the Commons. You had contacted me a few months ago about an image located at , as seen here: User_talk:LordAmeth#Copyright_status:_File:New_Okinawa_Prefectural_Museum.jpg. I explicitly explained that though I did not take that photo, the photographer, User:絶対◆2BenKiTYKw, who took the photo himself, has released the photo under the GNU License. I asked you to please fix the necessary notices and tags on the photo... And yet the image was deleted anyway. Why was that? Thanks much. LordAmeth (talk) 13:08, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Well, you forgot to apply the license to the dscription page. I missed your answer on your talkpage. Feels free to retansmit the image if the license is valid (I don't speak japaneese) and apply the license this time. --JuTa 13:16, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

About File:600px Giallo e Blu (Bordato)2.png

Hello Ju Ta. I want that you review this file because I modified. At Commons:Café a person answered me that I put this license: Template:PD-shape. I want you understand me that I only did a translate of Wikipedia in Italian to here. I don't know if there is a license trying it. Good bye. --Humberto del Torrejón (talk) 22:59, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I checked it and its OK now. regards. --JuTa 23:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Arena images

File:Arenahtml3math.gif

File:Arena math fig3-12.gif

What is not understandable about the licenses? See en:W3C Software Notice and License. mabdul 05:23, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, the problem is that they were in Category:Free screenshots without complete license a subcatgory of Category:Media without a license: needs history check and I could not find a license template for it. A bot will mark them again an again as "no license - pls. check" if these maintenance cats would just be removed. But I see now that W3C seems to be a commons compatible license. Could you tr to create a Template:W3C? Or alternativly apply {{PD-because}} or similar. --JuTa 07:03, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Nyaung Shwe C 2 (1961)

bitte siehe: OTRS|2013081010006025 --- Haubi (talk) 06:53, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Nochmals, was möchtest Du mir mit dieser Mitteilung sagen? Ich habe das gelöschte Bild weder mit "no permission" gekennzeichnet noch gelöscht, das war beides User:Fastily. Ich bin auch kein OTRS "Mitglied". Wenn Du dazu fragen hast, wende DIch bitte an Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. Gruß --JuTa 10:59, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Racism, editing with no source, sock puppeting, and accusing me of doing Taliban fundamentalism

Can you please take a look on this [3], he accuses me of doing Taliban fundamentalism and use racist words like Pashtun-Tajik ideas have no place in Wikipedia. Even though i am not a Pashtun nor a Tajik it is still racist, every ethnic group is allowed to be here. I have already showed him a source, but he keeps removing the edit. He also does the same here: [4] and here [5]. And he has also been told that he should not edit war but he continues, i have stopped doing it and are waiting for someone to check this. I also think that he using sock puppet as his other account. [6] He recently also said this to me: Please stop Talibanism in wikipedia. Please respect other people, you must know that here is not Kandahar. He also made other disprutive edits on articles some time ago where he removed Persian names and pictures of Iranian kings. --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:00, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Walker Evans

Hi JuTa, the image I posted came from the Getty Research Institute's Open Content Program. Here is the image on their site, and here is the FAQ for their program, where they state that all images in that program are PD.

Are there copyright restrictions for the Getty's open content images?

No. The first release includes 4,600 images of works of art believed to be in the public domain—in other words, works not protected by copyright under U.S. law. The Getty does not claim copyright in digital images of public domain artworks.

What is the correct way to indicate that it is PD. I made a good faith effort to figure out which copyright code I was supposed to use, but apparently didn't do it right. Please advise.--Mandiberg (talk) 19:12, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I guess you are talking about File:Walker Evans Boardwalk.jpg. Well, that a bit hard to decide. The template {{PD-1923}} does not fit because it made later. {{PD-old}} does not fit because the autor died 1975 which is less then 70 years ago. {{PD-US-no notice}} might fit, but as far as I know some recharch for a copyright note is neccessary to be sure there was realy no such note. You better re-ask on Commons:Help desk other people if and which license template is fitting here. regards. --JuTa 19:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I have done so here--Mandiberg (talk) 21:29, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

For US works first published before 2002, the death of the author is irrelevant. They're in copyright or not based solely on publication date and following various bureaucratic rules. (Works published in 1978-2001 will leave copyright based on death of author, but never before 2049.)--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Bilder Malu Dreyer

Wie kommst Du zu der Erkenntnis, dass die 3 Bilder (Beispiel: Malu-Dreyer-03.jpg) von Malu Dreyer ordentlich beschrieben sind. Alle 3 Bilder sind offenkundig in Studios des SWR erstellt worden. Aus meinen bisherigen Erfahrungen mit Rundfunkanstalten habe ich die Erkenntnis gewonnen, das eine Genehmigung vorliegen muss, um im Rahmen von Fernsehsendungen kommerzielle Fotos erstellen zu können. Außerdem sind die Fotos von 2 unterschiedlichen Benutzern hochgeladen worden und beide sind nicht die Urheber. Dem Support-Team liegt auch keine Freigabe durch die Urheberin vor. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 21:59, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Also, das mit den Aufnamen in Fernsehstudios ist kein Urheberrechtliches Problem, damit hier IMHO nicht von belang. Das dritte Bild ist nur ein "crop" eines der anderen. Der Fotograf und die Quelle sind ja angegeben. Wenn Du meinst stelle bitte einen "regulären" Löschantrag, so dass über das Problem, und darüber ob es überhaupt eines ist, dikutiert werden kann. Und informiere dann bitte auch die Hochlader (das hattest Du bei dem "no permission" vergessen). Hinweise wie und was steht dann im Baustein {{Delete}}. (Auf "Weitere Informationen zeigen" klicken). Gruß --JuTa 22:09, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

RE: Copyright status: File:Escudo-LaGuardia.jpg

Please, delete it. It was uploaded in 2006 ;) --Covi (talk) 19:21, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done --JuTa 08:57, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Re: File:Psilocybe-azurescens-range-map.png

Hi. You deleted this file, however I created it myself. I no longer have the original. It would be great if you could undelete it.

-Alan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alan Rockefeller (talk • contribs) 2013-09-07T21:19:59‎ (UTC)

Well the original version was not uploaded by you but by User:Photohound. And on your version I cant find an "green spot" anywhere is the world. --JuTa 21:26, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

License in río Corgo*

I have added the license tag in the photos, I hope that the problem was solved. Bye!, --Elisardojm (talk) 07:19, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thx, I saw it. But someone else did it before leaving a double license template behind. I fixed that now. regards. --JuTa 18:25, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Peruzzi2.jpg

Picture is not mine, I just moved it from another project. --Sailko (talk) 12:19, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I know. But if you an it:-admin or know where to a one you might be able to check the oiginal license applied. regards. --JuTa 18:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Poor deletion

Your deletion at File:Cushioned cork center baseball schematic from Evolution of the Ball.png was not a properly considered decision. A little prod to Wikisource would have allowed this to have been properly licensed with {{PD-US-not renewed, Baseball Digest pre-1964}} as per the file from whence it came File:Evolution of the Ball, Baseball Digest July 1963.djvu. Wikisource asks Commons admins to think outside of the limited square of Commons Commons Commons Commons for files that have been uploaded for a period of time and take a moment to consider the sister projects. Please undelete the file.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:08, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I undeleted the file and renewed the poblem tag. Please correct the license now. --JuTa 07:18, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Santos Lugares train station

Hallo JuTa! Du hast im Januar die Kategorie "Santos Lugares train station gelöscht. Verständlich, da ohne Inhalt. Könntest du die Löschung rückgängig machen? Ich würde die Kategorie in übergeordnete Kategorien einpflegen und mehrere Dateien so kategorisieren. --Geogast (talk) 23:12, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, ist wieder da, nun bitte befüllen :) Gruß --JuTa 18:15, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Besten Dank!--Geogast (talk) 18:20, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Peter Jenni Profile

Hi, I got your message but I am not sure why the file might be considered under deletion since it comes under CERN's Document Server copyright to which I referred when asked about the copyright of this image (also adding a link to it). I am wondering if you could let me know which is the right licence in order to avoid having the image deleted and any inconvenience this might cause. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pcharito (talk • contribs) 2013-09-12T13:27:06‎ (UTC)

Hi, the main problem is that no license template is included on the file description file of File:Peter Jenni profile.jpg. The moe detailed poblem is that the CERN license is not free enough to keep the file on commons. Every image on commons has to be reuseable fo any, including commercial, puposes. When I understand http://copyright.web.cern.ch/ correctly, commercial use is pohibitet by the license. Sorry. --JuTa 17:51, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Re: File:Schema Roller thrust bearing, cylindrical.svg

Ich hab die Lizenzen ergänzt für die Zeichnungen die Du gelöscht und wiederhergestellt hast. Sorry, ich habs erst jetzt gemerkt dass die fehlen! Danke für die Aufmerksamkeit. (Wiki-Archiv:[7]) --Carnaubo (talk) 08:13, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Aber imme gern doch. PS:Ich hatte sie nicht gelöscht, sonden Fastily. Ich hatte sie "nur" als "no license" gekennzeichnet. Gruß --JuTa 17:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Aso. Besten Dank auch von mir! --Carnaubo (talk) 09:03, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Löschung zweier Bilder auf Commons

Du hast meine beiden Bilder File:Telefunken RE144 1937.jpg und gelöscht, angeblich wegen fehlender Lizenz. Hättest Du mich nicht vorher kontaktieren können? Dann hätte ich die Lizenz eingestellt. Jetzt muss ich die Dateien mühselig wieder neu hochladen. Ich habe vor zwei Tagen einen Undelete Requenst gestellt, der aber leider nicht mehr aufzufinden ist. Hihiman (talk) 06:31, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Hallo, Du wurdest doch benachichtigt am 8. bzw. 12. April - steht so auf Deiner Diskussionseite. Und gelöscht wurden sie am 16. bzw. 21 April. Gruß --JuTa 20:36, 13 September 2013 (UTC)