User talk:Ghirlandajo
Sergei Mikhailovich Prokudin-Gorskii images
[edit]Please use {{Creator:Sergei Mikhailovich Prokudin-Gorskii}}, what is common practice for work of art on Commons.
I just created it. Feel free to improve it.
EugeneZelenko 14:27, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
Re: Khatyn images
[edit]Could you explain why you deleted Khatyn images, which were apparently made by your brother? --Ghirlandajo 06:37, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- К сожалению, в Республике Беларусь (кстати, в РФ тоже :-() нет свободы панорамы и эти изображения (как и любые другие снимки скульптур, со дня смерти автора которых не прошло 50 лет) нарушали авторские права скульптора. Подробности можно увидеть в статье 19 закона об авторских правах РБ и консультации юриста (по-белорусски). --EugeneZelenko 14:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Jeremiah
[edit]Hi, Ghirlandaio! I see you have uploaded a restored version of Jeremiah. Very good, but you uploaded the restored one in place of the unrestored one. Please don't! Because if the unrestored painting has been intentionally used on a page, Restoration of the Sistine Chapel frescoes, for example, the image now looks very different.
Would you please revert to the original dirty picture, and upload the restored version under a similiar name with the word "restored" included. Mandy 12:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Russian Kremlin images, etc
[edit]You may remember this Commons:Deletion_requests/License_tags_of_russian_websites from some time ago. I would ask that you look at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#PD-RU-exempt_images_from_Kremlin.ru, as I believe your input may be useful in helping to determine whether Template:PD-RU-exempt is allowable for images and the like. Cheers, --russavia (talk) 02:38, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Walks.ru
[edit]Hi Ghirla, we have quite a few photos from walks.ru, such as File:Kremlingrand.jpg, and it's stated that he has licenced under GFDL and CC. Is there an OTRS for this? It would be good to upload more of his photos for use in articles, if he has given this permission, and perhaps create a category on Commons such as Category:Photos by Marina Lystseva so that all of his photos are also found in one central place on commons. If there isn't OTRS, could you possibly get his confirmation and send it to OTRS, so that there won't be any doubt in case they should ever be put up for deletion. What do you think? --russavia (talk) 07:53, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, scrub that, I see he has it right down the bottom of the main page on his website. I'll create a category for his photos, and perhaps a template. Cheers, --russavia (talk) 07:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- And I see there is already a template. I've updated it a little bit, but have created Category:Photos from Walks.ru in which the photos will be founds. I will go thru the photos which link from the template over time, and will add the Template:Information to them, and then they should all appear in the category also. --russavia (talk) 08:53, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Photo question
[edit]Greeting Ghirla, I have a question about one of your photos from the Ascension Church in Yaroslavl. Can you contact me at: ablattner@osb.org thanks! Ann
|
File:Mikh_yar_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:42, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
|
|
File:Poklonka_tsereteli.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Позднемосковское
[edit]Вот что бы сделать с Category:Late Muscovite period churches и Category:Middle Muscovite period churches ? Там какое-то столпотворение - Ростов, Белоозеро и Каргополь стали московитами, Василий Блаженый - "поздним" ... Офф, читаю на работе монографию - "Ростовские церкви 18 века". Так там автор стили по каждому архиерею анализирует. NVO (talk) 18:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Тут в категориях сам чёрт ногу сломит. У меня не хватает времени и собственные фото загружать, а уж о том, чтобы разгребать накопившиеся за годы авгиевы конюшни, не может быть разговора. Хорошо уже то, что хотя бы в вики разбил по периодам статьи о древнерусских постройках (напр. "Категория:Русская архитектура XVII века" и ее содержимое). --Ghirlandajo (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Хотя по сути, конечно, вы правы. Между каменными храмами конца XVII века в Московской, Ростовской и Холмогорской епархиях не так много общего. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 20:35, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Ярославское
[edit]Андрей, разрешите вопрос айпи: File talk:Shilovka spill in the Volga River.jpg. NVO (talk) 15:23, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Про наличники
[edit]Про наличники (см. Category:Windows in Russia - там их сейчас большинство). Стоит ли для деревянных окошек создать отдельную категорию? Слава Ивана Хафизова покоя не даёт ;). Elekhn предложил вариант Category:Carved wooden windows in Russia, но мне он не вполне по душе - в подмосковье, к примеру, искусство carved давно сгинуло, после войны в основном шло выпиливание лобзиком - какой уж тут carved... ?? NVO (talk) 18:30, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
- Category:Wooden window surrounds in Russia? --Ghirlandajo (talk) 07:00, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- По словарю наличник это platband, jamb, jambeau.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Выбросьте такие словари. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 17:31, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Мультитран даёт architrave (резной профиль).--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:39, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Коллега, мне некогда развлекать вас. ru:Архитрав - похоже на избяной наличник? --Ghirlandajo (talk) 18:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Мультитран даёт architrave (резной профиль).--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:39, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Выбросьте такие словари. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 17:31, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- По словарю наличник это platband, jamb, jambeau.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Про городища
[edit]Андрей, а как по-буржуйски правильно обозвать "городище" в живом городе? Вот, создал к примеру Category:Vereya Kremlin, но никакого kremlin'a в Верее уже пятьсот лет нету - есть только холм городища. NVO (talk) 15:06, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Обычно переводят как en:hillfort, хотя тут подразумевается нечто сельское. Точного соответствия, видимо, не существует. О Переславском кремле я бы написал "the site of Pereslavl Kremlin". --Ghirlandajo (talk) 20:33, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- Чтобы не было путаницы: в Переславле есть кремль (обнесённый валами), а городища нет. Рядом с городом есть городище (Клещин) — место, где был город.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:08, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Про поведение
[edit]Простите пожалуйста, но почему вы подумали, что принятие Гражданского кодекса — это моё поведение? Я не был депутатом Думы, я не голосовал за этот закон.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Oldamberroom.jpg
[edit]Hi Ghirla, in relation to File:Oldamberroom.jpg you have stated that this is your own work, but that it is {{PD-Russia}}. Can you please choose a valid licence in relation to the above, or if it isn't your own work please give sources for it, otherwise it is subject to deletion. I am currently cleaning up the PD-Russia category. russavia (talk) 03:39, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- Please find a diff where I stated that it's my own work. The claim is nonsensical. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:54, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Пришлось весь его вклад за 21 сентября отсмотреть, резвунец эдакий. Тогда он снес все ПД. :(( А первую партию вычистил 5 августа. Но у меня уже нет сил отсматривать. --Shakko (talk) 17:45, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- о, по ходу он больше не админ. Только не могу найти, сняли с него, или он сам отказался. --Shakko (talk) 17:55, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- В журнале прав в последнее время никаких изменений. Думаю, что админ. В испанском и французском разделах я пооткатывал правки бота, остальные пусть разбираются сами. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 09:37, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Ghirlandajo, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
|
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 06:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Здравствуйте! Уважаемый Ghirlandajo, я полагаю, что ваша правка была неконструктивна. Если по правилам Викисклада какие-то фотографии не могут быть здесь размещены, то не стоит их как-то скрывать в попытках защитить от удаления. Фото, за которые вы опасаетесь, можно перенести в локальный раздел, оформив под КДИ (см. пояснение от Alex Spade). --INS Pirat (talk) 11:27, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- ну правильно, давайте дразнить гусей --Ghirlandajo (talk) 14:00, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Андрей, к нам тут такая фотография приплыла, было написано, что церковь Андрея Критского. Это точно неверно. Я посмотрел, решил, что, наверное, Ильи Пророка, но 100% не уверен. Может, Вы знаете, что это может быть?--Ymblanter (talk) 15:12, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- Это церковь Николы в Меленках (File:Николо-Сковородский монастырь (Церковь Николы в Меленках).jpg). У меня много фотографий этого храма, даже и интерьера. Когда-нибудь загружу. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 06:35, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- Большое спасибо, сейчас исправлю.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected File:Гумилевы.jpg
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 14:54, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
[edit]
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 20:58, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014
[edit].svg){kind=logo}
Вітаємо!
З 1 по 31 травня 2014 буде проходити конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Цього року конкурс став міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!
Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) 20:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
You should add a source for the information "name lost". Thats a photo from the studio Mayer & Pierson in Paris, compare to Bildarchiv Preussischer Kulturbesitz, ID 10018396. Therefore also the copyright tag for the country of origin is missing (France), the tag for Russia is irrelevant for Commons unless there is evidence that Russia is the country of first publication. --Martin H. (talk) 22:36, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
С этой биржей вышла путаница и тут, и в статье ру-вп. Да, в изображённом здании - библиотека имени Пушкина, на месте бывшей усадьбы Мухиных (основа - 1-я четверть XIX века [1]). А хлебная биржа постройки 1900х годов, нынешний театр "Модерн", находится не на Спартаковской улице, а на б. Спартаковской (она же Гаврикова) площади - сейчас это угол Третьего транспортного кольца и Переведеновского переулка. Retired electrician (talk) 15:23, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Я видел, что там нестыковки, но не мог понять, в чем дело. Чудно, что все разъяснилось. Теперь осталось переименовать файлы. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 13:14, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Переименовал. Там в Басманном и Лефортове много таких странностей. Пробили сквозь пригородную застройку сначала железные дороги, а потом современные улицы - все связи разорвались, а вывески остались. Эту именно Спартаковскую площадь только по вывеске и можно обнаружить. Retired electrician (talk) 16:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Andrey Korzun (talk) 20:46, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the nice Courbet. Shouldn't the license be PD-Art-100? Courbet is long gone, his work is public domain, not CC. Thanks, regards, Hansmuller (talk) 15:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- PD-art is for "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art". This picture includes a frame which is not two-dimensional. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 15:25, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- That's really funny, the frame is not part of the work of art, you clearly intend the painting, not the frame! A painting is considered to be a two-dimensional object, even a van Gogh with thick paint! So this Courbet it is really PD-Art, like all old pictures from museums irrespective of their packaging etc.. Regards, Hansmuller (talk) 15:51, 31 May
2015 (UTC). Anyway, a 3-dim old artwork would also be PD-Art..Hansmuller (talk) 15:53, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected File:Statue of Ivan Krylov, Partiarshie prudy, Moscow.jpg
Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 12:59, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected File:Ustizhora-cerkov-anevsky.jpg
Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:09, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
- File:00 fomin.JPG
- File:00 shchusev.JPG
- File:00 zholtovsky.JPG
- File:02 sobinov.JPG
- File:02 stanislavsky.JPG
- File:02 yermolova.JPG
- File:03 dovzhenko.JPG
- File:03 tairov.JPG
- File:05 molotov.JPG
- File:Tomb babanova.JPG
- File:Tomb obruchev.JPG
Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 17:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Avvakum.png
[edit]
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Avvakum.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Avvakum.png]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
--Tom-L (talk) 22:16, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Максим Підліснюк (talk) 15:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:Bartholemew rembrandt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rettinghaus (talk) 08:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Levberg.jpg
[edit]Hi Ghirlandajo, how are you? Many years ago I uploaded to Commons a photo of Lev Berg from the English Wikipedia, which you uploaded there. I stated that you were the author of the image, but maybe I made mistake (I was pretty new at that time) and you just uploaded it to en.wiki. Now, they have open a deletion request for the image. Can you remember any useful information about the image to help decide if it should be kept or deleted? Thanks in advance. --Erfil (talk) 19:18, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:Mikh yar 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dogad75 (talk) 20:38, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
|
|
File:Mayak tomb.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dogad75 (talk) 11:42, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Your Photo of St Nikolas
[edit]Hello, I just want to inform you that I have used your good photo in my video/ vlog. I make vlog as a hobby. You can watch in youtube 9-Phq5Ca3o Thank you kindly for sharing your photo.
Best Regards, S. Toha Stef Toha (talk) 23:12, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Camerongallery.jpg
[edit]
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Camerongallery.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Castillo blanco (talk) 13:12, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected file:Mikh yar.jpg Taivo (talk) 10:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
|
|
File:Yar epitome.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.82.181.229 19:23, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 10:50, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
License review of File:Степановское-на-Тече.jpg
[edit]
Looks like you marked this picture Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 after some conversation with Victor Borisov? I can't find the license here: https://victorborisov.livejournal.com/138808.html (which means by default it's all rights reserved) - if he marked it with a free license somewhere else on his website, could you tell me? If he didn't, could you get him to email COM:OTRS? Otherwise we're going to have to assume it's copyrighted. Sorry. --GRuban (talk) 17:59, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Please enable e-mail to be eligible to win a prize in Wiki Loves Monuments!
[edit]
Thank you for uploading images for Wiki Loves Monuments!
However, we have noticed you have not enabled e-mail. To be eligible to win a prize the contest, you need to enable e-mail. This is what to do:
- Check the top right of your screen, and log in if you have not done so already
- Go to your preferences
- Scroll down to Email Options
- Enter your email address and click "Allow other users to email me"
- Click Save
Hello, please, don't just override my image without contacting me first. There are several reason for that: the image is a QI already and shouldn't undergo significant changes; I've the raw file and can always create a new version out of it without quality loss (which happens when reworking a JPG); it's unpolite when I explicitly ask in the description page not to do it. Thank you, Poco a poco (talk) 20:41, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Dear User:Poco a poco, I didn't meddle with color saturation. If you want to see what "oversaturated" means, take a look at File:Iglesia_de_San_Francisco,_Quito,_Ecuador,_2015-07-22,_DD_171-173_HDR.JPG or File:Iglesia_de_La_Compañía,_Quito,_Ecuador,_2015-07-22,_DD_149-151_HDR.JPG. Ghirlandajo (talk) 10:51, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- That's not the opinion of 11 and 14 experienced reviewers, those images are close to reality. Have you calibrated your monitor properly? Sorry, but I have better things to do than discussing this topic here. Thank you. Poco a poco (talk) 11:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.
[edit]
Dear Ghirlandajo,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.
To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)
[edit]
Dear Ghirlandajo,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.
To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
|
|
File:Borisgleb.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Микола Василечко (talk) 13:31, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey
[edit]Dear Ghirlandajo,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.
Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Please enable e-mail to be eligible to win a prize in Wiki Loves Monuments!
[edit]Thank you for uploading images for Wiki Loves Monuments!
However, we have noticed you have not enabled e-mail. To be eligible to win a prize the contest, you need to enable e-mail. This is what to do:
- Check the top right of your screen, and log in if you have not done so already
- Go to your preferences
- Scroll down to Email Options
- Enter your email address and click "Allow other users to email me"
- Click Save
|
|
File:02 nesterov.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Andrei Romanenko (talk) 14:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Great Subashshamis (talk) 11:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC) |
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Noflagofrussia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
