User talk:Dcastor

Uppskjutet/Höjdskräcken

Jag är tvungen och fråga om fotot i Göteborgs artikeln.. Är det som jag tror så att du tagit bilden i attraktionen "uppskjutet"? 213.15.70.204 12:15, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nej, den är tagen från "Höjdskräcken", men "Uppskjutet" borde ge en snarlik vinkel. /Dcastor 20:38, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Oskar_Braaten-1.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Oskar_Braaten-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dcastor 01:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lerbergets kyrka-1.jpg

Hejsan David. Jag satt och skrev om Henrik Jais-Nielsen på svenska Wikipedia och ett av de projekt han ritat var Lerbergets kyrka 1982. Men bilden du har tagit är på Höganäs kyrka (ritad av Ivar Tengbom) och inte Lerbergets kyrka. Lerbergets kyrka är en låg byggnad i mörkbrunt tegel, typisk för sin tids kyrkoarkitektur. Jag har bytt plats på bilderna på svWiki, men namnet är fortfarande fel. Jag vet inte hur man byter namn på bilder här så jag tänkte bara skriva till dig så du vet. MVH Jsdo1980 17:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tack för meddelandet. Jag har själv inte besökt någon av kyrkorna utan frågade min vän från trakten efter det att vi flugit över Kullahalvön vilken kyrka det var - det måste ha blivit någon miss i kommunikationen oss emellan. Jag ska försöka få bilden flyttad till rätt namn när helgerna är över. /Dcastor 22:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lerbergets_kyrka-1.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Lerbergets_kyrka-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dcastor 13:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:David_Castor.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:David_Castor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dcastor (talk) 17:59, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Eslövs kyrka

Hi Dcastor, you have categorized this church as "Brick Gothic" but we use this category only for medieval Brick Gothic architecture and this church is obviously "Brick Gothic revival". There is not yet any category covering this topic, I propose to create it soon. chhers --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 17:01, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see. Perhaps it would be good with an explanatory note on this on the category page. /Dcastor (talk) 23:32, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Medborgarhuset-1.jpg

Fint foto!--Ankara (talk) 22:35, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tackar. /Dcastor (talk) 14:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Compliment on Valbourgsbrasa-1

I came across your photo in [1], and found it stark, evocative and remarkable. The full-size photo, is subtle in other ways. I wonder what the "original" is! (I'm a sometime professional photographer, and this is the first time in Wiki I felt impelled to communicate my appreciation.) Best regards, Piano non troppo [2] (talk) 07:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your appreciation. /Dcastor (talk) 13:17, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lunds domkyrka exterior-2.jpg

Jag gillar verkligen den bilden! Anar att den inte har nån chans att få utvald status (den visar ju inte hela kyrkan) men ville bara säga det. Majbrasan kanske har en chans? Känner mig dock inte tillräckligt kunnig om fotografi för att våga nominera bilder här. /grillo (talk) 21:11, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tack för uppmuntran. Jag gillar ljuset i domkyrkobilden, men den är delvis oskarp. Majbrasan har jag fått en hel del positiv respons för, men det är en väldigt mycket enklare bild att ta. Själv räknar jag den inte bland mina 50 bästa här på Commons ;-) /Dcastor (talk) 20:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Green/yellow

Hi! I replaced your version of File:Heimaey.JPG because it looks rather washed-out and has very low contrast. I would prefer the original version to your over-brightened one, but thought that version too could use some improvement. I may have put a bit too much contrast into the picture, but your replacement comment puzzles me: "I preffer when the grass looks green". I fail to see what grass in my version (or the original) that is not green. In your version the color borders on yellow and the sky has lost most of it's blue, so I am wondering if you have a very dark setting on your computer screen. /Dcastor (talk) 18:10, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Yes perhaps your computer screen and my computer screen have a different rendering of brightness/darkness.

What do you think of File:Heimaey,_vu_du_Nord.jpg, which is inserted next to File:Heimaey.JPG on English Wikipedia's article en:Heimaey ?

On my computer, File:Heimaey,_vu_du_Nord.jpg's grass and sky look good, and I would like File:Heimaey.JPG to look similar : the sky is pale, but people watch the picture in order to see the Island. The sky is not the important part of the picture. And most of the sky is filled with white clouds. Teofilo (talk) 19:35, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a big difference between the two. File:Heimaey,_vu_du_Nord.jpg is sharp and not at all hazy like File:Heimaey.JPG. I am making a new attempt, trying to make a brighter version, but without the haze. /Dcastor (talk) 20:02, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your last version is OK for me. Teofilo (talk) 20:28, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lynx lynx-4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent --Cayambe 18:11, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jonstorps_kyrka_interior-4.jpg

File:Jonstorps_kyrka_interior-4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:42, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Julkrubba.jpg

File:Julkrubba.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HEJ

Hej, får jag ladda upp följande bilder:

Är lite osäker, det står "Fri för publicering" men jag hittar inte licensen och den måste väll va http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.sv . EWR (talk) 20:22, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hej. Nej, den texten räcker inte eftersom den inte uttryckligen tillåter redigering av bilden. Du kan ju eventuellt försöka att kontakta fotografen om du vill och försöka få bilden släppt under godkänd licens. /Dcastor (talk) 20:29, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

International Photoworkshop

Hello, motivated by the six Fotoworkshops of the German Wikipedia an international Photoworkshop in the Swedish Nyköping will be launched during the Easter Weekend 2010. Nyköping was chosen since Skavsta Airport is a Ryanair Base and very close to Stockholm. Further information can be found on Commons:Photoworkshop_Nyköping_2010.--Prolineserver (talk) 22:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liam Norberg-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment QI. Wikipedia is in need of high-quality, original pictures of celebrities. Fred Hsu 00:49, 26 March 2010 (UTC) Question is this man is a celebrity ? --Jebulon 22:16, 27 March 2010 (UTC) Comment Well, he's got an wiki article, and you and I don't. What I really meant: look at Gong Li. There is exactly one image of her in entire wikidom. Fred Hsu 03:49, 28 March 2010 (UTC) Comment Norberg is best known for en:Sökarna and his unusual way to help finance the production. Quite famous in Sweden.--Ankara 15:35, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you mr. Bot, but the image was not nominated by me. I am the photographer who took the picture, and I do not nominate my own photos. Thank anyway for the appreciation and for the notification. /Dcastor (talk) 19:01, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have now changed the text of template. /Dcastor (talk) 16:04, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I have started to nominate my own pictures after all... ;) /Dcastor (talk) 21:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Used your photo of Earthrace from Wikimedia Commons

I just put your image of Earthrace in Malmo in the "Peter James Bethune" article on Wikipedia. It's only my second upload. If you have a chance, please check the licensing detail and credits. I'm not sure if I did it correctly. Nice photo! Now I need one of Bethune... Ghostofnemo (talk) 08:48, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ghostofnemo. The Wikimedia Commons is the main databse for media used in all Wikimedia projects. The media in this database are directly accesssible from the different Wikipedia projects (I found that the one you are referring to is the English Wikipedia). This means that there is no use in re-uploading media from Commons locally on the English Wikipedia, since the media files on Commons can be directly used fith the File-tag inside Wikipedia. I am changing the tag in en:Peter James Bethune to point at the Commons original so you can see how it works. Here is the edit. /Dcastor (talk) 10:46, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see! I can just use the Wikimedia Commons file name! Cool, thanks for the tip! Ghostofnemo (talk) 11:02, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

QI oppose

Thanks for the note on File:Black Moshannon SP Pump House 2.jpg and explaining your oppose. I kind of figured when it had not been promoted in this many days that it was not going to make it, and I appreciate your helpful explanation. Take care, Ruhrfisch (talk) 18:58, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Highbury Clock-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Meets QI, like that it shows the clock is situated slope. Gnangarra 02:06, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inre hamnen i Helsingborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 20:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Low clearance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments beautiful Framing QI IMO --Croucrou 12:02, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
But imo tilted cw --Mbdortmund 13:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment My original upload was tilted ccw, I am pretty sure that this one is not tilted, though it may at first glance give that impression because the top of the carts are not even (which is, I think, why I uploaded a tilted version in the first place). /Dcastor 13:29, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My idea was really caused by the top of the carts --Mbdortmund 14:57, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent changes

Hi, this recent edit of yours specified the license better, thank you, but also removed other useful notes from the image and the deletion discussion template. A deletion discussion template should remain until the discussion is closed. Also, please do not omit major changes to a page from the edit summary in the future. Best Hekerui (talk) 09:53, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was an obvious mistake, I am not in the habit of deleting tags (which, with the exception of QI, all were placed there by myself or on my initiative, the deletion nomination included). I don't know why they were lost in my last edit, but thanks for putting them back. /Dcastor (talk) 10:20, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, in retrospect it seems weird, since no one deletes his own QI tag, so sorry for the lecture :) Best wishes Hekerui (talk) 10:29, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Begynnelse-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice --Mbdortmund 20:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Begynnelse-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Begynnelse-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Avenue 17:25, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Lynx lynx-4.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lynx lynx-4.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 15:05, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brompton Oratory-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 21:56, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin in the Fields-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Albans, Golders Green-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Jovianeye 23:50, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Albans, Golders Green-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments 14:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC). good. --Cayambe 08:06, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Östra Broby kyrka-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 14:40, 20 May 2010 (UTC) Support Agree for this one from the series. No visible geometric artifacts here. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:58, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Östra Broby kyrka-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, QI IMHO. — Jagro 12:33, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Östra Broby kyrka-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Östra Broby kyrka-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Ill Verldshistoria

Tack! Jag saknar bra eller ens hyfsad programvara för dylikt puts. Du är mer än välkommen att putsa på andra skanningar också om du vill. Det kommer att ramla in flera hundra (rena textsidor oräknade) om jag inte tappar sugen. -- Lavallen (talk) 13:39, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jag har inte gjort den här typen av puts tidigare, så jag prövade mig fram lite. Jag putsar gärna några till, men jag är rätt säker på att jag tappar sugen långt innan flera hundra. ;-) /Dcastor (talk) 13:58, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gör inget om du tappar sugen. - Det du inte gör, det gör någon annan eller så blir det inte gjort - är inte hela världen det heller... Men din hjälp uppskattas! -- Lavallen (talk) 13:44, 30 May 2010 (UTC) (som är tillbaka efter att min ISP tyckte jag skulle ha ett vitt dygn.)[reply]

Technical note on JPEG compression

Hi. I have just made the following modification to your file:

Recompressed (using XnView, at JPEG quality level 80) from 6.5 MB to 1.2 MB. No loss of quality is detectable even to an inquisitive eye.

If you decide that this change is detrimental, please, revert it.

You may want to check JPEG compression settings in your camera. I find level 80 satisfactory.

Greetings
—6birc (talk) 15:22, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that a higher compression rate is satisfactory for most uses, but keeping as much information as possible makes is good for people who might want to re-edit the picture. /Dcastor (talk) 16:39, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Operaen på Holmen-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice --Mbdortmund 21:03, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria and Albert Museum-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me, good composition --J. Lunau 19:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Victoria and Albert Museum-2.jpg

Såg att du nominerat File:Victoria and Albert Museum-2.jpg för QI. Jag tycker att fotot (som annars ser mycket bra ut) lutar lite åt vänster?--Ankara (talk) 20:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Det har du rätt i. Jag var på resa och hade ingen möjlighet att se över det när det var aktuellt. Kanske redigerar och åternominerar jag så småningom. /Dcastor (talk) 09:57, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lunds domkyrka i maj-1.jpg

Jag lade upp din excellenta bild av Lunds domkyrka på http://wikitravel.org/sv/Lund -- Inteloutside2 (talk) 13:05, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trevligt att den kommer till användning. /Dcastor (talk) 09:47, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you weigh in here (hidden image author categories)

Here - you previously noted that you were similarly unhappy about the automatic "hide" on the user categories. Ingolfson (talk) 09:26, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree with you on this one. I don't think it will make much difference to discuss it on a user talk page, though. If you start (or come across) a new discussion on the topic in an official spot, please let me know. /Dcastor (talk) 10:05, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NT 1526

Vem han i mitten är vet vi ju...

Men de andra två. Jag är inte så hemma på bilder som dessa som jag tror du är. Min gissning är att det är fråga om Maria och aposteln Johannes, och är ganska säker på det. Då utgår jag från att det är bara en enda (inte alltför ung) kvinna, och hon anses ofta vara den mest centrala qwinnan i NT. Och den som var med henne på Golgata var just J, som däremot är mycket ung, vilket åtminstone jag utläser av NT att han var.

Men du ser troligen mer än jag i en bild som denna... -- Lavallen (talk) 17:36, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jag ser ganska precis det du beskriver och skulle också gissa på jungfru Maria och aposteln Johannes. Men jag är inte expert på symboler i målningar och om det finns någon sådan ledtråd så missar jag den i det här fallet. (Kan man få någon ledning utifrån var i verket bilden är placerad?) /Dcastor (talk) 19:38, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I en faksimil från 1951 av 1526 års utgåva av NT. Detta är sidan före Förordet. Träsnittet (som jag gissar det är) återkommer i slutet efter felstavningar och register, men före faksimilutgivarens efterskrift. Denna bild ska även finnas före förordet till NT i 1541 års utgåva. Natan Lindqvist återger åtminstone denna bild i sin textkommentar från 1941. -- Lavallen (talk) 08:31, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Det sammanhanget säger ju just ingenting. Hade bilden funnits i anslutning till något specifikt textstycke kunde man ju eventuellt ha dragit slutsatser utifrån det. /Dcastor (talk) 09:39, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Man pratar om örnar och kalkar som attribut i artiklarna, men jag ser inget dylikt... -- Lavallen (talk) 11:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terrakottaarmén-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, QI for me --Chmee2 11:25, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grattis!

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xi'an bell tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:00, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

V-wolf (talk) 13:50, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niklas Piensoho.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Lmbuga 16:53, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Samuel Ljungblahd-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bit yellowish but ok. --kallerna 10:44, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

monument

Hi. Random comment. I was looking through the cat on this subject, File:Trafalgar Square-1.jpg jumped right out. Glancing through this page, I also notice you have a talent for photographing bildings and such. Cheers for making them available! cygnis insignis 03:31, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It's inspiring to know that the effort is appreciated. /Dcastor (talk) 04:08, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanya quarry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --kallerna 08:17, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kullens fyr 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments some problems, but good work und nice colors. QI --Carschten 18:06, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kullens fyr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. A geocode would help.--Jebulon 17:27, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mushrooms in Scania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 18:59, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DavidCastor 000230.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Waltham, The Duke of 19:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Resonans.jpg

File:Resonans.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

178.232.124.8 11:12, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Grattis till priset i Wiki Loves Monuments Sverige!

Juryn har utsett dina bilder File:Stora Kronohuset.jpg och File:Två vattentorn.jpg till delad andraplats i kategorin Byggnader. Båda bilderna skickas vidare till Europafinalen.

Med vänliga hälsningar

Jan Ainali, Wikimedia Sverige

Jonas Hedberg, Nordiska museet

Lars Lundqvist, Riksantikvarieämbetet

Oj. Tack så mycket. Imponerande snabbt jobbat med bedömningarna. /Dcastor (talk) 22:38, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Dcastor,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 21:01, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Två vattentorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice composition --Taxiarchos228 16:04, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Begynnelse-3.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Begynnelse-3.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 16:20, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. (The information was there, so there was no cause for deletion. It is now made more obvious, though.) /Dcastor (talk) 19:42, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing this. --Jarekt (talk) 19:55, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder från KMB

Hej. Jag ser att du nyligen laddat upp en del bilder från Kulturmiljöbild/KMB (t.ex. File:Dalboslätten.jpg). Jag ville dels tipsa om {{Kulturmiljöbild-image}} som är designad för dessa bilder och dels om detta verktyg som fyller i mallen åt dig. Allt du behöver är det 14-siffriga nummret efter "id=" i bildens url. / Lokal _Profil 23:00, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Insåg nyss att bilden inte alls var uppladdad speciellt "nyligen". Jaja, hoppas att tipset kan komma till nytta i framtiden ändå =) /Lokal _Profil 23:05, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tack för tipsen. /Dcastor (talk) 11:25, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Dcastor,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 01:34, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank You for Your post and nice comment. I try my best and will try to contribute as many quality pictures as possible. Your photos are also very nice. /Mihael Grmek (talk) 15:20, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token c32e3afc17034980c0ccec587d9bb04f

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Wiki Loves Public Art about to take off!

Dear Dcastor,
During May we are running Wiki Loves Public Art, a photo contest focused on getting photographs of artworks and sculptures uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.

Have a look at the lists of objects included, and of participating GLAMs in your country, and upload as many images as you can.

Kind regards,

the organizers of Wiki Loves Public Art

Message delivered by odderBot on 13:33, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tre nya bilder

Hej!

Jag har laddat upp tre nya bilder som du skulle kunna lägga in i svwps artiklar.

Alimemazin APL 20mg.jpeg
Nitrazepam Recip 5mg.jpeg ‎
Paroxetin 20mg.jpeg

Mvh Obelix (talk) 00:15, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Identification of files

Hi Dcastor,

The identification of my file is in no way associated with their classification in the Commons but a classification system that I use in other area.

Just to be convinced to see a category such as this one.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Ancient_Roman_reliefs_in_Rome

Here you can see that my files are not systematically placed at the head of class.

However, you are free to think what you want.

Regards

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 13:45, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to explain. I am glad that I was wrong. Good luck with your continued uploads. /Dcastor (talk) 13:50, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beautiful Crucifixion

Greetings David Do you know anything about this [3] wonderful artwork in Basilica San Sebastiano on Appia Antica, Roma? I'm assuming it is Medieval Best regards RobertNotafly (talk) 19:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but I know nothing about it. It seems like you're not the only one assuming it's medieval, tho. /Dcastor (talk) 22:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks.I'll enquire in Rome (and let you know) Robert aka Notafly (talk) 20:43, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neptune's fields

Hi David, just a quick note to say that I used one of your beautiful photos, here. Thanks so much, Drmies (talk) 20:49, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dag Hammarskjold.jpg

File:Dag Hammarskjold.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ankry (talk) 18:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skånes universitetssjukhus i Lund–flygbild 06 september 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:58, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Södervidinge kyrka, flygfoto 2014-09-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:58, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thanks for all the nice photos you contribute to this project! I just used one of them in de:Esbjörn Hagberg. Tkarcher (talk) 09:40, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou, Tkarcher. /Dcastor (talk) 18:12, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I use one of your photos

Hello David!

I have used a photo of Felis silvestris in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org)

You can see directly in the follow link and clic over "Siguiente" ("Next"):

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/imagen.php?id=45212

If you wish (and I hope yes), you can send me (via fernando.lison@educa.madrid.org) some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor profile" in Animalandia:

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=David+Castor

I want show to my students (and so everybody) that Animalandia is make for "real person", and I can tell them about "generosity", "share" and other similar words that we use very few at this time...

This is my "contributor profile" and others, for example:

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Carmen%20Jim%E9nez

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=David%20P%E9rez

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Steve%20Garvie%20%28Rainbirder%29

In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!!

Regards!

Fernando Lisón, from Spain --Fernando.lison (talk) 15:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me. :) /Dcastor (talk) 01:27, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zelenskydebati (cropped).jpg

File:Zelenskydebati (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Krdbot 17:00, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September är nästan slut: missa inte Wiki Loves Monuments 2019!

Hej,

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare bidragit med bilder till den svenska deltävlingen av Wiki Loves Monuments, och jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också. Kategorierna är som vanligt byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer, och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september. Om du varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 15:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Garpenbergs herrgård-panoramat

Hej David! Jag fick se att mitt panorama över Garpenbergs herrgård är med i urvalsrond 1 av WLM. Nu är ju inte risken så stor att den går längre än så, men jag skulle ändå vilja att ni inte tar den i beaktande under resten av processen. Detta då bilden kraftigt accentuerar en svag lutning på grusplanen, så att den inte gör terrängen rättvisa. Jag vill också ge ett tack för att du och de andra ställer upp på detta viktiga juryarbete! Allt gott / Vivo (talk) 16:30, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tack för det glada tillropet såväl som för påpekandet om bilden. Det sistnämnda hade jag redan anat och låtit påverka min bedömning i nästa rond. Allt gott! /Dcastor (talk) 06:23, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Almquist

Hi, David. Just dropping by to let you know that I've used all of your superb photos of stained-glass windows by Carl Almquist on English Wikipedia. You'll find them at Carl Almquist and List of works by Carl Almquist. Thanks for posting them here. Antiquary (talk) 21:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nu är det dags för Wiki Loves Monuments 2020!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2020 – stort grattis till Brydand100 och hans fotografi av Röttlefallet! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!

Den 1 september inleds 2020 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 14:24, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Dcastor,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Nu presenterar vi vinnarna i Wiki Loves Monuments 2020!

Hej,
(For information in English, see here.)
Årets WLM-jury har efter hårt kämpande och stor vånda kommit till ett resultat, och på fredag 11 december, 10.00 (SNT), tar vi första steget i tillkännagivandet när vi i en livestream på youtube presenterar de tio bilder som går vidare till internationella finalen. Du, och alla andra, är välkommen att vara med när bilderna presenteras av Eric Luth och Johanna Berg.
Passa även på att boka in 15 januari då pallplatserna kommer att tillkännages under födelsedagsfirande i samband med Wikipedias 20-årsdag. /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 10:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update on usage of image of the Capture of Astartu

Per your request, this is to let you know that I am using your image of the Capture of Astartu (File:Capture of Astartu-1.jpg) in the website http://alamapa.com/ (a website in Hebrew focused on mapping the Bible), specifically in the page for biblical Astartu: http://alamapa.com/location/%d7%a2%d7%a9%d7%aa%d7%a8%d7%95%d7%aa

Thanks, --Aaadir (talk) 19:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me. I did study some (Biblical) Hebrew at the University, but that's long ago and I only learned the basics, so I can read the text only by help from machine translation. Great to see that you found use for my picture, tho. Dcastor (talk) 08:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nu är det dags för Wiki Loves Monuments 2021!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2021 – stort grattis till Måns Hagberg och hans fotografi av reveln vid Vivesholms naturreservat! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!

Den 1 september inleds 2021 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 12:53, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hög tid att ladda upp: Wiki Loves Earth 2022!

Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Tävlingen började 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Även om fortsatt försiktighet är att rekommendera går det bra att ge sig ut på fotosafari och fotografera naturen i ditt närområde – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 13:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nu startar Wiki Loves Monuments 2022!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth!

Den 1 september inleds 2022 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, kulturmärkta fartyg och fritidsbåtar och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 10:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Dcastor,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

An exhibit from an unidentified museum

Hello, do you think you could remember or look up where you made File:Hotchkiss M1900-1.jpg in 2008? Ain92 (talk) 16:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to remember exactly where already when uploading. It was taken somewhere near Karlskrona, Sweden, but we visited several parts of the old military fortifications that day and I was part of a group, just tagging along with a bit too little attention as to exactly where we were. /Dcastor (talk) 07:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UFO-monument photo

Hello, when improving the UFO-monument in Ängelholm on en-wikipedia, we used your excellent photograph for the main image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%84ngelholm_UFO_memorial Per the message on the image, I'm posting this note to say thanks. Regards, Rjjiii (talk) 01:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Äntligen maj: Wiki Loves Earth 2023!

Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2023 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Nytt för i år är att vi utöver bästa foto även belönar fotograferande av tidigare ofotograferade objekt samt bästa bildserie om minst tio fotografier av samma objekt. Tävlingen börjar 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Expeditioner, fotosafari eller en helt vanlig promenad? Via en smidig karta som visar ditt närområde hittar du bra ställen att besöka – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 12:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tack. Jag har några bilder redo för uppladdning. Förhoppningsvis hinner jag ta några till. /Dcastor (talk) 17:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gällande bilder från Hallands Väderö

Hejsan! Tittar igenom bilderna från tisdagens WLE-uppladdningar och upptäckte att dina bilder från Hallands Väderö har fått fel taggning i mallen {{Wiki Loves Earth Sweden}}. Istället för 2000962 har de fått id-numret för Söderåsens nationalpark (2001828). Är det okej för dig att jag redigerar mallen och lägger in rätt NVR-id? -- LevandeMänniska (talk), 00:16, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tack för kollen. Helt okej att ändra. Om du inte redan har gjort det så fixar jag det nu. /Dcastor (talk) 12:07, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bara kul att hjälpa till. Finns betydligt mer svårupptäckta och skumma fel här på Commons :-)

Gillar förresten bilden File:Stenbrottet i Svanshall 4, 26 februari 2022.jpg . -- LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:13, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Äntligen maj: Wiki Loves Earth 2024!

Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Utöver bästa foto belönar vi även fotograferande av tidigare ofotograferade objekt samt bästa bildserie om minst tio fotografier av samma objekt. Tävlingen börjar 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Expeditioner, fotosafari eller en helt vanlig promenad? Via en smidig karta som visar ditt närområde hittar du bra ställen att besöka – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! / Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 10:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nu startar Wiki Loves Monuments 2024!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth!

Den 1 september inleds 2024 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera det svenska kulturarvet. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, kulturmärkta fartyg och fritidsbåtar samt arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! / --Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 08:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forsmarks kyrka 20 juli 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tullportsbron 15 maj 2024 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prästamarken 24 maj 2023 bild 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 22:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prästamarken 24 maj 2023 bild 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 22:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prästamarken 24 maj 2023 bild 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 22:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sävelången vid Nääs 11 maj 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 22:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tullportsbron 15 maj 2024 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:56, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Högakustenbron 12 juli 2024 Bild 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 20:29, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 10:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]