User talk:Chrumps
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Halo in cirrostratus 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--Tony Wills 08:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello Chrumps, your photo does not show Coenagrion puella. Much "better": It is a male specimen of Ischnura pumilio. Please correct that. -- Regards, Fice 14:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ischnura pumilio is very similar. Thanks for paying attention, fixed. BTW could you take a look on Image:Calopteryx virgo F.jpg - is it female Calopteryx virgo or maybe female Calopteryx splendens? I'm not 100% sure. -- Chrumps 22:07, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- I think, Calopteryx virgo is correct - the wings are rather brown. Indead, often it is quite difficult to decide between these two species, when only females are present. Back to the other picture: Couldn't you reload it with a new file name? That would be the best solution. -- Kind regards, Fice 09:08, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Cetonia-aurata.jpg, which was nominated by Lycaon at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Cetonia-aurata.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
--Simonizer 22:11, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Proposal concerning User PH-n templates
[edit]Hi, there is a proposal and vote concerning the {{User PH-0}},...,{{User PH-3}} templates, that you may be interested in. --Tony Wills 10:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I was doing some category sorting and came across this image you uploaded last summer. Have you ever nominated it for QI? I really enjoyed it and would like to nominate it for you, if you don't mind. Durova 17:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- (just my 2 cents worth) Well below the size guideline, it would be an up-hill battle :-) --Tony Wills 22:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that became a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. -- Bryan (talk to me) 14:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ischnura pumilio M.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rhododendron luteum (flower).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kosciol sw Idziego w Inowlodzu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wieża neobarokowa Uniejów.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berberis chinensis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hibiscus-syriacus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit].jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rhododendron williamsianum (flower).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Liatris spicata Purple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aythya nyroca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Calopteryx virgo F.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cetonia-aurata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hypericum oblongifolium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zamek Królewski w Łęczycy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kosciol sw Katarzyny w Korczewie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hi Chrumps.
Info I listed your deletion requests there. --Leyo 12:58, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rhododendron catawbiense.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Schemat
[edit]Hehe, po dwóch latach ktoś zauważył, brawo! ;) Będziesz na 10-leciu? Jeśli tak, to stawiam Ci piwo. ;) -- CLI (talk) 15:04, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- Poprawiłem, dzięki za przypomnienie. Mam czas reakcji jak polskie urzędy... ;) -- CLI (talk) 10:29, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Location?
[edit]Hi Chrumps - do you have a location for this pic, please? File:Aythya nyroca.jpg. Is it captive, or wild? Thanks! MPF (talk) 22:01, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Używam ChemOffice. Struktury tworzę sam, bardzo rzadko ze wzorów SMILES i praktycznie zawsze upewniam się, że są poprawne. O ile tylko mam jak. :) Pozdrawiam, Adam Rędzikowski (talk) 00:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC).
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Chrumps⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Requests for Translation Adminship
[edit]Hi there! I am looking for the RfTA page and I am sure that I have seen it before but can't seem to find it now. I would be most grateful if you could point me in the right direction :) Thanks in advance! --WikiBronze (talk) 23:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi WikiBronze! The place for RfTA is Commons:Bureaucrats' noticeboard. Just add a new section. Regards, --Chrumps (talk) 09:25, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your swift response! Have a good one. --WikiBronze (talk) 01:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Chrumps,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Zmiana nazwy kategorii
[edit]Witaj,
Po prostu zmień nazwę kategorii. Polecam włączenie w "preferencjach" gadżetu "Cat-a-lot", co znacznie przyspieszy pracę. Pamiętaj też o aktualizacji odnośników w Wikipediach, w których jest hasło o tej uczelni, np. w pl:Politechnika Łódzka jest link do Category:Technical University of Lodz. Po przenosinach proponuję pozostawić przekierowanie w opróżnionej kategorii. Pozdrawiam, tsca (talk) 09:22, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- Nie bardzo rozumiem, na czym polega problem z utworzeniem nowej kategorii.
- Przekierowanie warto zostawić na wypadek odnośników z zewnątrz i jako wskazówkę dla ew. innych edytorów, którzy mogliby ją omyłkowo odtwarzać.
- tsca (talk) 09:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ratusz w Łęczycy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Macrolepiota-procera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Magdalene of Canossa Verona.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town Hall in Łęczyca, Poland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euphorbia epithymoides.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panthera tigris altaica in Lodz Zoo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oryx dammah 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amanita muscaria 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Great Synagogue in Piotrków Trybunalski.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Łęczyca Castle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panthera tigris altaica in Lodz Zoo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Corpus Christi in Łowicz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Corpus Christi in Łowicz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gentiana dinarica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macrolepiota procera (Parasol mushroom).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gentiana dinarica.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary and Saint Alexius collegiate church in Tum view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Margaret of Antioch church in Zadzim, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Nicholas in Papowo Toruńskie, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 15:20, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
PH-4 | This user is able to take professional quality photographs. |
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary and Saint Alexius collegiate church in Tum view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Cześć, przyszedłem tu tylko z prośbą o poprawienie obrazka. Przyjęło się określenie "deklaracja" zamiast "stwierdzenie" :) KABEXXXIOR | DYSKUSJA 15:59, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Ostatnio tłumaczę teksty na Wikidanych i nie spotkałem się z claim, ale spokojnie, wierzę Ci :) Ja proponuję użyć słowo "deklaracja", bo jest tak używane w tłumaczeniach :) KABEXXXIOR | DYSKUSJA 16:29, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Ale w tym przypadku chodzi o statement, które jest (nie patrz na to, co jest powszechne w informatyce, tylko to, co na Wikidanych) tłumaczone, zarówno przez ludzi, jak już przez sam system jako deklaracja. KABEXXXIOR | DYSKUSJA 17:07, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
PŁ
[edit]Witaj – mam prośbę, czy mógłbyś w jakiejś nieokreślonej przyszłości, będąc przypadkowo w pobliżu zrobić choć po jednym zdjęciu do tych dwóch cat.: [1] [2]? pzdr. Darekm135 (talk) 08:46, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!
[edit]https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wl7zNEQdp6z9Vb
This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.
To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
New version of Wikidata statement.svg
[edit]Hi there!
I just thought I would drop you a not and let you know that I have just updated File:Wikidata statement.svg and then saw that you uploaded the translated versions! I did take a quick look at the tool URL referenced but it seems to be down. It would be great if you could upload new translations :) ·addshore· talk to me! 17:12, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Christ Pantocrator in Nesebar, Bulgaria (front view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Giles' church in Inowłódz, Poland (a view from SW).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of_St. Giles in Zrębice, Poland (a view from SW).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church in Tanum, Sweden (view from the west).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Peter and St. Paul in Ciekocino (front view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Toxotes jaculatrix (Banded archerfish).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
|
File:Tornado aircraft.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
De728631 (talk) 18:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Request for Commons page of WikiScienceCompetition
[edit]Hi! The translation was introduced when i was still polishing the page, days ago. As a result, there is a last change who should be done. The section "National competitions" should be put under the "rules". is it possible to do that? It's not a big deal, I just had no idea how to do it manually with all the tags.--Alexmar983 (talk) 04:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Atlantoxerus getulus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbary ground squirrel (Atlantoxerus getulus) on Fuerteventura.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Catherine church in Korczew.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Osby kyrka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Prośba o małe poprawki na grafice
[edit]Czy mógłbyś zmienić daty w tej grafice? A konkretnie zmienić daty oddania do użytku trzech teleskopów na rok 2024: Gigantyczny Teleskop Magellana, Thirty Meter Telescope, Ekstremalnie Wielki Teleskop Europejski. Pewnie będą jeszcze obsuwy, ale na razie tak będzie OK. Pikador (talk) 09:25, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Dzięki, mógłbyś jeszcze zerknąć na któryś z artykułów z tą grafiką, bo czcionka jakaś taka mniej czytelna się zrobiła. Pikador (talk) 16:03, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Minął prawie rok i są niestety kolejne opóźnienia, czy mógłbyś zaktualizować? Kosmiczny Teleskop Jemesa Webba - 2021, Large Synoptic Survey Telescope - 2021, Gigantyczny Teleskop Magellana - 2025, Ekstremalnie Wielki Teleskop Europejski - 2025, Thirty Meter Telescope - 2027. Pikador (talk) 07:03, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Re: File:Muzeumwlokna.jpg
[edit]Bardzo przepraszam za te metadane z pliku z Siklawicą, to faktycznie niedopuszczalne aby takie dane znikały w jakichkolwiek okolicznościach. Będę miał to na uwadze, jak też pozostałe uwagi. Czonek (talk) 20:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Re: Kiedy nie można nadpisywać zdjęć
[edit]Dziękuję za wszystkie uwagi w tym i poprzednim wątku, masz oczywiście we wszystkim rację. Aby rozwiać jakiekolwiek kontrowersje wycofałem wszystkie swoje edycje plików graficznych wykonane programami wpieranym AI. A ponieważ i tak nie byłem dumny z dokonywanych zmian, to chciałbym całkowicie usunąć dodane prze zemnie wersje z wiki, ale albo nie mam uprawnienia albo przyrastają mnie technikalia. Czonek (talk) 14:36, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Gapurov1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
