User talk:Céréales Killer
Image Tagging Image:Alain_Ghertman_076.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Alain_Ghertman_076.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 20:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Alain_Ghertman_138.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Alain_Ghertman_138.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 20:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Tugny).ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 21:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Problème d'attribution d'images
[edit]Salut, Bapti. Je suis actuellement sur OTRS (ticket 2009042410025995) un épineux problème d'attribution d'image. Tout une série de planches sur les cactées a été mise sur commons mais en omettant l'origine et l'auteur des planches rectifiées. Elles viennent d'un ouvrage tombé dans le domaine public mais les images publiées ont été reprises d'un travail (travail dérivé) de retouche et d'amélioration des dites planches par Daniel Schweich qui met son travail (fichier PDF et pages web) sous licence Creatives Commons. Or, l'utilisateur qui a mis ces planches sur Wikimedia a totalement occulté l'origine de ces planches. Donc, Daniel Schweich demande que l'on conserve ces planches (il en propose même d'autres) mais que son travail soit reconnu. Or, il s'agit de dizaines et de dizaines de planches. Donc, à ta connaissance, y aurait-il un bot capable de faire ce travail ? Merci de ton attention. ~Je peux te fournir le fichier .doc qu'il m'a fait parvenir avec la liste des images et le texte qu'il voudrait voir inséré. Céréales Killer (talk) 08:50, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Salut,
- Je ne connais pas particulièrement de bot sur Commons. Le plus simple me semble être de contacter un dresseur sur Wikipédia et qu'il fasse les modifs ici en vitesse réduite (1 édit/min) sur son compte principal.
- Mais ça serait peut être tout aussi rapide de faire les corrections à la main... Ça serait peut être plus clair si tu pouvais déjà faire un exemple...
- Bon courage en tout cas...--Bapti ✉ 10:49, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:44, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Portrait Thierry Chenavaud.jpg was uncategorized on 5 September 2009.
- Image:Ansacq.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Méthode Coué.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Tvvmb.png was uncategorized on 23 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Image 40.png was uncategorized on 25 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:13, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Nuancier Pantone.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Pompage illicite et intensif de photos
[edit]Ce site http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/angicourt a récupéré ta photo sans indiquer les mentions nécessaires : type de licence + ton nom. Je viens d'ajouter sur leur page ce qui est nécessaire ... mais l'affichage n'est pas automatique, et les responsables refusaient jusqu'à la semaine dernière de citer WP, Commons et les auteurs ! Gonflé, hein ! Voir http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Le_Bistro/16_mars_2011#Suivi_de_l.27affaire_Infotourisme.net et le Bistro des jours précédents et suivants, ainsi que User:Markus3/Photos réemployées. Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 21:27, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Merci de m'avoir prévenu ! C'est fou ce que les gens sont irrespectueux du travail des autres. À suivre ! Céréales Killer (talk) 21:43, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Nouvelle "intrusion corrective" de ma part pour http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/ansacq - Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 05:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Merci ! Et tu peux aussi ajouter : http://www.infotourisme.net/circuit-touristique/1622/bienvenue-a-creil (quartier Saint-Médard)... Céréales Killer (talk) 08:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Voilà qui est fait ! Je ne sais quand (et si) ils "vailderont". Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 07:58, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- Tiens ! ... Ta photo est d'ailleurs utilisée 2 fois ... voir onglet "Jour 1" et onglet "Jour 4". Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 08:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- Alleluya ! Ils ont ajouté : Crédit photo : Céréales Killer, licence CC-BY-SA-3.0 Céréales Killer (talk) 10:19, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- Merci ! Et tu peux aussi ajouter : http://www.infotourisme.net/circuit-touristique/1622/bienvenue-a-creil (quartier Saint-Médard)... Céréales Killer (talk) 08:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Nouvelle "intrusion corrective" de ma part pour http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/ansacq - Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 05:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Avetik-Issahakian.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stefan4 (talk) 19:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 06:01, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Chloedeslysses.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Chloedeslysses.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Chloedeslysses.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Rosenzweig τ 16:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Salut,
- Je ne vois pas d'autorisation pour ce fichier. Par ailleurs, j'ai ajouté le modèle qui-va-bien pour les œuvres d'Alain Ghertman où il manquait. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Bonsoir, Yann et merci pour tes interventions. Chloé des Lysses à écrit à permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org le 11 août dernier pour autoriser la publication de son autoportrait. Elle m'en a fait parvenir deux autres mais j'attends que la situation soit réglée pour les téléverser. Céréales Killer (talk) 18:55, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Cambio de nombre
[edit]Hola, Céréales Killer. ¿Puedes indicarme cuál es el procedimiento? ¿Hablas de un sysadmin de commons, de meta...? Gracias y perdona por los inconvenientes. --Discasto talk 10:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hola, Discasto, te hablo de un sysadmin de meta (Legoktm) que solo puede actuar sobre cuentas con muchas ediciones. Céréales Killer (talk) 10:54, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Vote Arlette.L 2002 par département.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kumkum (talk) 23:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Taghazout.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Taghazout.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Smooth O (talk) 08:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Taghazout.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Green Giant (talk) 17:56, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
User talk:Memersonloh has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this user page ⧼pageinfo-talkpage⧽, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Flabbergabber246 (talk) 16:50, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Rename
[edit]Please cancel my renaming because it was caused by mistake. I normally intended to be renamed to ΟΤΜΑ in the future. Please...--ΟΜΚΑ (talk) 13:47, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Please renaming from Πλάτανος to Σοκολάτα.--Πλάτανος (talk) 13:53, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Derivative works
[edit]I noticed some of your uploads include derivative work. And in France there is sadly no FoP. So photos of photos, artworks at concerts, stuff like that.. You should probably go over your uploads and crop/blur a few things. File:TAPFS 2019-4-14 Seine 04.jpg could be cropped. Sadly, you can't show Skippy. If you need help, I can make stuff disappear. People too. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:46, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- I went ahead and cropped Skippy, but I'll leave the rest to you. (unless you need my help) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- I understand, France is not the best way to post such kind of pictures... You work with Photoshop or Gimp or something else? If you have time, you can proceed with the other photos, your work is nice. Céréales Killer (talk) 06:58, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- Gimp mostly. Unfortunately I couldn't do much about most of the other images. They would become unusable, but if you disagree, let me know which files could be saved. I don't know how old File:Johannes Gutenberg, Tours.jpg is, is it PD? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:36, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- I understand, France is not the best way to post such kind of pictures... You work with Photoshop or Gimp or something else? If you have time, you can proceed with the other photos, your work is nice. Céréales Killer (talk) 06:58, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Saint-Jeannet - La Main au collet.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Saint-Jeannet - La Main au collet.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:08, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:TAPFS 20170318B.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:TAPFS 20170318B.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:09, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Space Invaders entrée A6B x Périphérique.jpg
- File:Île de Ré 2015 076.JPG
- File:Île de Ré 2015 036.JPG
- File:Île de Ré 2015 037.JPG
Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:20, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- It is too difficult to manage with all these rules. I will stop right now to upload pictures. Too bad, because the project needs such kind of work. Céréales Killer (talk) 10:50, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Please don't be discouraged. It's too bad France doesn't have FoP, but there are still many things you can upload. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:44, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- I am sorry, but, no, I do not want to work for hours managing between licenses, categories, captions, etc. to see my work deleted. I will not upload nothing else. I am in the project since 2003 and I have spent enough hours here. Céréales Killer (talk) 11:58, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- I can look at what you want to upload before you upload it? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:04, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- No. Thanks. Céréales Killer (talk) 16:22, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- I want you to know I feel rather bad about this. And I don't know what I can do. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:21, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- No. Thanks. Céréales Killer (talk) 16:22, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- I can look at what you want to upload before you upload it? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:04, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- I am sorry, but, no, I do not want to work for hours managing between licenses, categories, captions, etc. to see my work deleted. I will not upload nothing else. I am in the project since 2003 and I have spent enough hours here. Céréales Killer (talk) 11:58, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Please don't be discouraged. It's too bad France doesn't have FoP, but there are still many things you can upload. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:44, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Nostalgie
[edit]Hi! Are you sure that on these photos is Rosa 'Nostalgie'? I think it may be rather 'Double Delight'. Regards, Salicyna (talk) 12:25, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hello ! Yes, I am sure, I bought these roses from Willemse almost twenty years ago and they still are alive ;) Céréales Killer (talk) 12:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
File:Diego Maradona, Napoli.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 09:12, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Texte Star Wars.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Clodion (talk) 20:14, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Boby3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Racconish 💬 10:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Capture Google La Poste bancale.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JopkeB (talk) 14:50, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
User:LeonaardoG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Leonaardog (talk) 01:01, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
User talk:Eric Mainier has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this user page ⧼pageinfo-talkpage⧽, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:07, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Autopatroller
[edit]Salut, Je t'ai donné le droit Autopatroller. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:29, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Salut, Yann. Merci ;) Céréales Killer (talk) 19:39, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Din Grogu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Di (they-them) (talk) 22:38, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Jeux sans frontières - trophée emporté par Charleroi en 1980 à Fribourg (Suisse) - 04.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jeux sans frontières - trophée emporté par Charleroi en 1980 à Fribourg (Suisse) - 04.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |