User talk:Bautsch
Orgullomoore 13:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Orgullomoore 13:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Otourly (talk) 19:05, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Luetzowplatz.Herkules.1.jpg was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Luetzowplatz.Hotel.Berlin.Berlin.jpg was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Grand.Hotel.Esplanade.SW.jpg was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Luetzowplatz.11-13.jpg was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Luetzowplatz.Hotel.Berlin.Berlin.Night.jpg was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Luetzowplatz.West.jpg was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Grand.Hotel.Esplanade.S.jpg was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Luetzowplatz.3.jpg was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Luetzowplatz.jpg was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Luetzowplatz.1.jpg was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Luetzowplatz.7.jpg was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Luetzowplatz.5.jpg was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Luetzowplatz.9.jpg was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
File talk:Screenshot.Smartphone.Shopping-Apps.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file talk, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Matt (talk) 11:25, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Screenshot.Smartphone.Shopping-Apps.PNG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot.Smartphone.Shopping-Apps.PNG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Screenshot.Smartphone.Shopping-Apps.PNG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Polarlys (talk) 14:54, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
File:Screenshot.Smartphone.Shopping-Apps.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stefan4 (talk) 21:06, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Moin, moin! Bei der Signatur ist irgendwie die Quelle verloren gegangen. Kannst Du die bitte nachtragen? Danke schoen! :-) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:32, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)
[edit]In other languages (translate this)
|
---|
|
Thank you for uploading some images!
Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!
|
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Mater Dolorosa Berlin-Lankwitz - Kreuzweg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 21:32, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Hdr10-plus-logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Draceane talkcontrib. 22:04, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Blutmond.27.7.2018.Blauanteil.nach.Austritt.aus.Kernschatten.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
219.78.190.70 03:02, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Blutmond.27.7.2018.Blaukanal.nach.Austritt.aus.Kernschatten.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
219.78.190.70 03:03, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Blutmond.27.7.2018.Gruenkanal.nach.Austritt.aus.Kernschatten.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
219.78.190.70 03:03, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Blutmond.27.7.2018.Rotkanal.nach.Austritt.aus.Kernschatten.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
219.78.190.70 03:04, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Mater.Dolorosa.Kreuzweg.01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Havang(nl) (talk) 12:02, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Video recording of a meteor of the Perseids.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
File:Aquila.mpg was recently deleted
[edit]File:Aquila.mpg was recently deleted by Magog the Ogre for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: File is empty, corrupt, or in a disallowed format (F7)
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
File:UCLA astrophysicist Andrea Mia Ghez.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whpq (talk) 20:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Planetarium.Kuppel.Silhouette.2048.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2003:EC:5F24:6C00:6C57:949E:1AE5:2BD8 11:54, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request: not creating the subpage and not transcluding. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Papoura.Crete.360degrees.panorama.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Archie02 (talk) 09:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Zugspitzplatt.20220319 004015 078 77 191 100 244.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |