User talk:Auréola
Activity | Talk | Contribs | Gallery |
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--SieBot 22:10, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Cchegas.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Cchegas.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Finn Rindahl 00:20, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 07:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 08:05, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 21:06, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 21:10, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
Deleted contents
[edit]
Hello Auréola,
the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:
- Image:Mariabethania.jpg
- Image:Difereiro.jpg
- Image:Carlosdrummonds.jpg
- Image:Fanpaulo.jpg
- Image:Rcarlos.jpg
- Image:Rdesenho.jpg
The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on the Wikimedia Commons. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on the Wikimedia Commons: "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how the Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Copyright violations
[edit]
Hello Auréola,
You have uploaded several images that are copyright violations and you have done so despite our requests not to do so, and despite our instructions. If you do not stop uploading pictures that are not free, your account will be blocked. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on the Wikimedia Commons. Please do leave me a message if you have further questions. →Christian.И 19:39, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Re: Esclarecimentos
[edit]Sim, claro, fique à vontade, apenas peço desculpas pois demorará algum tempo entre uma mensagem sua e uma resposta minha. Se preferir, pode me localizar no MSN durante os fins-de-semana. Boas contribuições Lugusto • ※ 17:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) 17:18, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) 17:19, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Please note that if you won't provide a valid license in 7 days your image will be deleted and if you upload a lot of images without licenses you may be blocked from editing wikimedia-commons. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) 17:28, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Imagens da Agência Brasil
[edit]Ao carregar imagens da Agência Brasil, por gentileza use SEMPRE a maior resolução disponível, que você deve baixar clicando em "baixar alta resolução" que está um pouco abaixo da foto. Não copie apenas o thumbnail. Obrigado, Dantadd✉ 14:07, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Outros esclarecimentos: ao carregar imagens da Agência Brasil use APENAS a tag "{{Agência Brasil}}" (e não "{{AgenciaBrasil}}"). Não use qualquer outra tag de licença, uma já basta. Também procure categorizar corretamente as imagens. Jogá-las na categoria "Brazil" não é lá muito construtivo. Dantadd✉ 14:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Critically evaluate Flickr licenses | Image:The Beatles EMI. GEP 8946.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters.
|
-Brynn (talk!) 00:42, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Critically evaluate Flickr licenses | Image:The Beatles EMI. GEP 8946 (2).jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters.
|
-Brynn (talk!) 00:45, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Critically evaluate Flickr licenses | Image:The Beatles in John's House.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters.
|
-Brynn (talk!) 00:50, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:The_Beatles_wax_dummes_(2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Megapixie (talk) 04:02, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but Image:Beatles sculptures.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-dave pape (talk) 16:32, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:The Beatles in Nevada.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 17:46, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:The Beatles Draw Image.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 17:46, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Please link images
[edit]
Hello Auréola!
Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.
To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.
You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!
Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 17:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Mapinha.jpg is uncategorized since 6 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 17:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Vilmarosa.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Map question
[edit]I made a blank map (no labels) so you can add the labels in Portugese (I use MS Paint). If you can not do this, please let me know. Ruhrfisch (talk) 14:47, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- It looks very nice - there was a white rectangle below Paris, so I filled that in and moved the Londres (London) label up slightly. Hope that was OK. Ruhrfisch (talk) 19:10, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- Glad to help, I also added interwiki links to the English and Portugese articles Ruhrfisch (talk) 13:17, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Categorias e outros
[edit]Queria pedir, novamente, que não jogue todo e qualquer arquivo sobre o Brasil na categoria "Brazil". Por favor! Isso só superlota a categoria e dá um trabalho danado para limpar depois. Reflita com calma antes de inserir categorias. Também quero pedir que fotos publicadas no Brasil há mais de 70 anos devem ser marcadas com a licença {{PD-Brazil-media}}. As licenças {{PD-Art}} ou {{PD-old}} só devem ser atribuídas se temos CERTEZA que o autor das imagens morreu há mais de 70 anos. Conto com sua colaboração. Obrigado. Dantadd✉ 22:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- Outra coisinha: se a imagem não tiver outra versão, deixe o campo em branco. Não marque com um "X". Dantadd✉ 22:55, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Are you claiming to be the photographer of File:Stanley Kubrick 1968.jpg? Or did you make a mistake? The description has "I took this picture in 1968, when Kubrick was filming 2001. Other photos were taken by other photographers present at the time." It is identical to the poster attributed to Dmitri Kessel (1902 – 1995) at Director, Stanley Kubrick, During Filming of His Movie "2001: A Space Odyssey" Premium Photographic Print by Dmitri Kessel at AllPosters.com. The caption there reads "From the archives of LIFE magazine, this image is digitally printed on high gloss premium photographic paper resulting in a unique silver pearlescent finish with stunning visual impact and depth that is suitable for museum or gallery display." 84user (talk) 20:45, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Paulo_Porto_e_Sônia_Oitica_como_Romeu_e_Julieta.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Paulo_Porto_e_Sônia_Oitica_como_Romeu_e_Julieta.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Martin H. (talk) 22:01, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Machado_de_Assis,_busto_por_Jean_Magrou.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Machado_de_Assis,_busto_por_Jean_Magrou.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Machado_de_Assis,_busto_por_Jean_Magrou.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Martin H. (talk) 22:03, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Estátua_em_bronze_de_Machado_de_Assis.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Estátua_em_bronze_de_Machado_de_Assis.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Estátua_em_bronze_de_Machado_de_Assis.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Martin H. (talk) 22:04, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Olá Auréola.
Você carregou diversas imagens que violam os direitos de autor e fê-lo apesar dos nossos pedidos para não o fazer. Se você não parar de carregar imagens não-livres, a sua conta será bloqueada e deixará de poder contribuir no Commons. Informe-se sobre a política de imagens do Wikimedia Commons na página sobre o Licenciamento. Por favor, se tiver dúvidas entre em contacto comigo na minha página de discussão. Muito obrigado.
|
-- Infrogmation (talk) 04:15, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Harold_Bloom.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Justass (talk) 00:34, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Brazilian_Actor_Sergio_Cardoso_as_Hamlet.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Brazilian_Actor_Sergio_Cardoso_as_Hamlet.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Martin H. (talk) 07:36, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
MSN
[edit]Hallo Areola, unfortunately no, I have not MSN. Actually, I just moved to a new home, and for a while I shall not have access to the internet. I will check my messages on Commons once or twice a week. If you want to leave me a message anyway, you may. Thank you for your patience. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 20:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
TUSC token 83ebf7d4c1db9e77eb95892cb7b92afd
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
File:Raphael missing.jpg
[edit]Do you have any information, that it is leopard, the young man wears?--Kürschner (talk) 12:37, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
File:Dreaming_with_gods.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Amada44 (talk) 10:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:DanielGranieri.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:DanielGranieri.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:DanielGranieri.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Martin H. (talk) 03:45, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:DanielGranieri.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:DanielGranieri.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:DanielGranieri.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Please forward a written permission from the copyright holder. The linked email is no permission at all, at best a "Wikipedia only" permission. The linked photographer website, likely the copyright holder, does not mention any permission on free reuse by everyone, everywhere for any purpose including commercial purposes as required on this project. --Martin H. (talk) 15:18, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
File:ZeusCourtingGanymede.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
It is not enough that the original piece (of art) is old, when it was found only recently and thereby the photographer can't be dead since >70 years. --Túrelio (talk) 06:42, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
File:Mapinha.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
malo (talk) 03:29, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Alex_Sanders_coven.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Prosfilaes (talk) 23:09, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Files you uploaded may be deleted
[edit]The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commonswikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 08:24, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Stones_members.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stones_members.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Stones_members.JPG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Denniss (talk) 00:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Stones_members.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Denniss (talk) 00:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Brazilian_Actor_Sergio_Cardoso_as_Hamlet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 13:35, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
File:Brasileiros_000.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Denniss (talk) 23:06, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
File:AWallandMyHairStyle.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
– Adrignola talk 21:15, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Orange_Blue_Boy.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:39, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Nando-souzamay.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
– Adrignola talk 14:55, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Jorge Rafael Videla cropped.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jorge Rafael Videla cropped.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Jorge Rafael Videla cropped.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Cambalachero (talk) 00:37, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
File:CapaVidasSecas 1ed.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
— billinghurst sDrewth 10:24, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:31, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Gasparetto.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Gasparetto.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Gasparetto.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gunnex (talk) 10:59, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Considering "Author=Victor Affaro" + http://casa.abril.com.br/materia/casaroes-e-suas-historias#5 (2009, "Fotos: Victor Affaro", © Todos os direitos reservados) = http://msalx.casa.abril.com.br/2011/10/15/1033/casaroesaecjan09-05.jpeg. Gunnex (talk) 11:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, Indeedous (talk) 00:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Pete F (talk) 22:50, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Myself in my bed.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Josve05a (talk) 18:25, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
File:Daniel Granieri Ator.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 17:33, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
File:LeonardoAmuedo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 18:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
File:GTM Esculpindo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 14:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Audubon-page-turning 240.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Audubon-page-turning 240.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Audubon-page-turning 240.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gunnex (talk) 14:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
File:The Modernity of Shakespeare.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hop on Bananas (talk) 19:29, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Arquivo Nacional
[edit]Olá Auréola! Saudações. Vi que adicionou uma imagem à categoria do Arquivo Nacional. Que bom que se interesse por este acervo. Talvez não seja de seu conhecimento, e aproveito para convidá-lo a conhecer, o wikiprojeto que desenvolvemos com o arquivo nacional: [1]. Boas edições! --Joalpe (talk) 15:20, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Mais uma coisa! Tome cuidado para não duplicar imagens já carregadas, só que mal categorizadas, vide: File:BR RJANRIO PH 0 FOT 34783 027.tif. Note que o AN nos envia as imagens em muito boa resolução. Abraço. --Joalpe (talk) 17:05, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Avenida Presidente Vargas Igreja de Nossa Senhora da Candelária Centro Rio de Janeiro 2013.jpg
[edit]
Ww2censor (talk) 20:19, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
File:HairStyle.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:43, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Fernanda Montenegro e Bibi Ferreira 1972.jpg
[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 20:04, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Bibi Ferreira 1972.jpg
[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 20:04, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Clementina de Jesus e Paulinho da Viola 1963.jpeg
[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 20:04, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Gilberto Gil outubro de 1972.jpg
[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Gilberto Gil outubro de 1972 (cropped).jpg
[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Fernanda Montenegro e Bibi Ferreira 1972.jpg
[edit]
Elisfkc (talk) 16:55, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Clementina de Jesus e Paulinho da Viola 1963.jpeg
[edit]
Elisfkc (talk) 16:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Gilberto Gil outubro de 1972.jpg
[edit]
Elisfkc (talk) 16:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 20:09, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Lula Pelo Nordeste - Caravana Dia 15 - 31 08 2017 - Ouricuri e Araripina (PE).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Lula Pelo Nordeste - Caravana Dia 15 - 31 08 2017 - Ouricuri e Araripina (PE).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Lula Pelo Nordeste - Caravana Dia 15 - 31 08 2017 - Ouricuri e Araripina (PE).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Deputado Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT-SP) discursa na Assembleia Nacional Constituinte (1988).jpg
[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 18:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:LulaPeloNordeste - Caravana Dia 14 - 30 08 2017 - Carirí + Juazeiro do Norte (CE).jpg
[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 18:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Lula Pelo Nordeste - Caravana Dia 11 - 27-08-2017 - Campina Grande + Currais Novos (RN).jpg
[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 17:57, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Lula Pelo Nordeste - Caravana Dia 15 - 31 08 2017 - Ouricuri e Araripina (PE).jpg
[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 17:57, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Lula Pelo Nordeste - Caravana Dia 6 - 22-08-2017 - Aracajú (SE) + Penedo (AL).jpg
[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 17:57, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Lula Pelo Nordeste com indígenas - Caravana Dia 6 - 22-08-2017 - Aracajú (SE) + Penedo (AL).jpg
[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 17:57, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Category:Carolina Maria de Jesus has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)