User talk:ArkadiuszZ

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ArkadiuszZ!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warszawa Kościół Matki Boskiej Loretańskiej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good; but there is a fat dust spot and some bird spots in the sky (please clean). --A.Savin 19:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded --ArkadiuszZ 06:57, 2 May 2014 (UTC)  Support OK. --A.Savin 09:35, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Ostróda location map

Hej. Obie mapki są potrzebne? File:Ostróda location map(1).png, File:Ostróda location map.svg. pjahr @ 20:23, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Łomża - kaplica cmentarna cmentarz wojskowy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI.--Jebulon 16:33, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katedra św. Michała Archanioła w Łomży.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction necessary. --Cccefalon 04:49, 13 June 2014 (UTC)  Done--ArkadiuszZ 05:28, 13 June 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:13, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Szablon zabytek

Używa Pan starą (błędną) formę szablonu : tak jest źle ((zabytek|PD|A-956 z 30.06.2152)) a tak jest dobrze ((zabytek|PD/A-956 z 30.06.2152)). Zostało to już wyjaśnione w tym szablonie: "((Zdjęcia poniżej ożywają starej formy szablonu "Zabytek" i mogą nie być poprawnie skategoryzowane w podkategoriach "Category:Cultural heritage monuments in ... Voivodeship‎". Jeśli możesz to sprawdź kategorie i zmień format. Zdjęcia te docelowo powinny zostać skategoryzowane pod własnymi kategoriami, a wtedy szablon "Zabytek" powinien zostać przeniesiony do kategorii zabytku i usunięty z opisu pliku. Pozdr. Gdaniec (talk) 14:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Mapa Marek z Open Street Map ma błędny przebieg granic miasta.

Mapa miasta Marki, którą zrobiłeś na podstawie danych z OSM w 2014 roku, konkretnie File:Marki location map(1).png ma niewłaściwy kształt granic miasta (np. jezioro Czarne jest przecięte granicą, natomiast rzeczywiście znajduje się całkowicie w granicach Marek). Poprawiłem ostatnio przebieg granicy miasta na podstawie strony [1], stąd moje pytanie czy mógłbyś wykonać nową wersję? Chciałem zrobić to sam, ale wydało mi się to dość skomplikowanym zadaniem po chwili zabawy w jednym z programów do renderowania map z OSM. Nie wiem jak dokładnie to robiłeś, ale jeśli masz po prostu gotowy kod na wyrenderowanie tego w taki sposób, że granica jest niebieską linią, reszta jest taka i taka, to nie powinno zająć to zbyt długo. Crusier (talk) 13:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dębki – słup graniczny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Superb bokeh, very nice! And extraordinary sharp where it has to be. --Basotxerri 18:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pomnik Chrystusa Króla w Świebodzinie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Kroton 18:28, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pałac Zamoyskich w Kozłówce 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 17:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katedra św. Michała Archanioła w Łomży (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:46, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 September 2016 (UTC)