User talk:とある白い猫/Archive/2007/07
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
——————————————— Archive, July 2007 ——————————————— All of those you list, ecluding only Image:IMG 7503 - MI - Stazione Cadorna FN - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto 31-Mar-2007.jpg and Image:IMG 6470 - Milano - Stazione Nord Cadorna - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto - 3-March-2007.jpg, which were not nominated by me but by another anonymous user. In my personal opinion they do not pass the "threshold of originality" test and could hopefully stay in Commons. --User:G.dallorto 16:54, 5 July 2007 (UTC) hello[edit]Hmm... --Sadik Khalid 09:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC) ERROR Please Visit this [[1]] --Sadik Khalid 06:23, 9 July 2007 (UTC) Thank you very much for helping malayalam wikipedia --Sadik Khalid 08:40, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
malayalam for computer is കമ്പ്യൂട്ടര്--Vssun 12:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
typo[edit]Hi. There is a spelling mistake in User:とある白い猫/Talk Template/intogen/ar. I corrected it in User talk:とある白い猫/Talk Template/intogen/ar. --Meno25 13:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Done at User:Meno25/White Cat. (Some links don't exist in arwiki. Note that the Arabic language is written from right to left.) I am glad that I helped you. --Meno25 16:24, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Closing of Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Foto[edit]You haven't notices i requested Template:PLCC to be deleted (that is: replaced by just GFDL) too. A.J. 18:48, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations! It has administrators rights now. --EugeneZelenko 14:01, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Close on Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Su-37-Draft.svg wrong conclusion[edit]During the course of the discussion the user pretty much admits admits that he traced the image using the automatic tracing function in inkscape on a copyright to produce the resulting svg. That would be pretty much the definition of a derivative work. If you zoom into the SVG [2] you can see none of the lines are distinct - they are blobby and indistinct as the result of automatic tracing process - during the discussion he refuses to explain why the lines are blurry and repeatedly ducks the question The worst thing is that the user in question has uploaded dozens of other images that appear to equally be copyvios.
If you need a final proof that it's a tracing - I've uploaded my own tracing of the image temporarily to bayimg here: http://bayimg.com/faeOBaabk.svg All I did was download the image, resized it to approx 2k, loaded it into inkspace and traced it. I'm not alone in this - four other users indicated that they thought it was a copyvio in the deletion discussion. The only two who didn't were the uploaded and a low contribution user whose argument amounted to "You can't prove it's a copyvio". I urge you to reconsider the closing and take action on the other images. Megapixie 13:35, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
|