Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 24 2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Butter Tubs Pass, North Yorkshire --Kreuzschnabel 19:47, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 22:07, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Germany, Heppenheim, main market place --Berthold Werner 19:05, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 19:15, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination KOBELCO mobile crane RK450 in front of SOGT Kimanis plant --Cccefalon 18:15, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:27, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination District Kota Belud, Sabah: Rice winnowing with traditional winnowing tray --Cccefalon 18:15, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:27, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint John the Evangelist church in Paczków --Jacek Halicki 17:53, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 19:17, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint John the Evangelist church in Paczków --Jacek Halicki 17:53, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:27, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hermitage of St Peter, Tepeyahualco, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 17:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:05, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zagreb Cathedral, Croatia --Poco a poco 17:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 19:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Unusual windows in Preradoviceva Street, Zagreb, Croatia --Poco a poco 17:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 22:07, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Art Pavillon, Zagreb, Croatia --Poco a poco 17:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:05, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gardens of the Linderhof Palace, Bavaria, Germany --Poco a poco 17:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 19:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mourèze, Hérault --Christian Ferrer 11:11, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 14:25, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villeneuvette, Hérault --Christian Ferrer 11:11, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn I withdraw my nomination --Christian Ferrer 11:15, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Antonov An-12, registration RA-93913. Malmö Airport control tower. --Tupungato 10:28, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:46, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 378s pass at Highbury & Islington. Mattbuck 06:50, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion ok --Taxiarchos228 07:03, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lighthouse at Cap Formentor --Taxiarchos228 06:25, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 07:57, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lighthouse at Cap Capdepera --Taxiarchos228 06:02, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kadellar 14:36, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Naturschutzgebiet “Rheinaue zwischen Büderich und Perrich” and city view, Wesel, Germany --XRay 05:54, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Steinsplitter 14:58, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Viktor, Xanten, Germany --XRay 05:54, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:58, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination By Gormé. Macro picture of a small-sized stereo camera -- Gormé 14:52, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, --Démosthène 14:26, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination By Démosthène. Rusted hinges on the sea shore --Démosthène 14:49, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Dust spot left side. Left part completly oof and bad crop. Middle part not sharp. No QI. --Cccefalon 13:27, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination By Démosthène. Optical isolator used to protect lasers diodes from scattering --Démosthène 14:38, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Dust spot. Blue hot pix under the "P". But the reason for decline is: It is not not sharp enough because the DoF is too shallow. The sharpness is exactly on the "20", hence all other characters are blurry. Sorry, no QI for me. --Cccefalon 13:34, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Al Koot Fort, Qatar --Poco a poco 11:31, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment dust spot (see notice) --P e z i 20:16, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Gone Poco a poco 22:01, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Strange... The fort and the wall before it look rather tilt, but the other buildings seem straight. What happend here? Is this a stitch? --Stegop 00:20, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
What is more reliable an old fort or newly built buildings? It is a single frame picture Poco a poco 18:48, 21 July 2014 (UTC) Support QI. --P e z i 21:31, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Château de Tanlay, Burgundy, France: the facade of the big castle seen from the courtyard. --Myrabella 09:24, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Sharpness just ok --Poco a poco 11:53, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Done Sharpened a bit. --Myrabella 11:25, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Ciampinoi bowel and the downhill Fis Ski World racetrack in Gröden --Moroder 08:05, 20 July 2014 (UTC) I withdraw my nomination Picture already QI --Moroder 14:25, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
-
- Nomination Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa --Jacek Halicki 22:09, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion IMO, it's QI. Nevertheless, I would have not corrected the perspective so perfectly, as our vision expects a little bit of convergence with such high POV. But I guess that the majority here disagreess with that, righ? --Stegop 00:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wrocławska Gate in Nysa --Jacek Halicki 20:16, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Stegop 00:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination National Park De Alde Feanen. Location, It Wikelslân. Marked footpath through marshland.
Famberhorst 04:42, 17 July 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Support A little bit yellow but IMO still QI. --XRay 06:13, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination National Park De Alde Feanen. Location, It Wikelslân. Marked footpath through marshland.
-
- Nomination Lúgano Tower, Benidorm, Spain --Poco a poco 18:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support The light and natural contrast are rather dull, but IMO is technically excellent. --Stegop 00:09, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
So, what speaks against a promotion? Poco a poco 18:59, 21 July 2014 (UTC) Support --Stegop 21:15, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 91110 at King's Cross. Mattbuck 06:55, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Crop could have been better. I personally don't like foreground and background. Why is it so significant to see this train at King's Cross? In my opinion "only" valuable, but don't want to make a decision. --Klaproth 18:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
This is QI, not VI - significant is irrelevant, value is irrelevant. Resistance is futile. Mattbuck 23:06, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
very bad composition, disturbing wires, random crop, bad angle --Taxiarchos228 06:39, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Capturing the yearlings: Wildpferdefang 2014, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmen, Germany --XRay 05:02, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose only foreground (grass) and the boy at right are in focus IMO --Christian Ferrer 17:32, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination National Park De Alde Feanen. Location, It Wikelslân. Nuphar lutea.
Famberhorst 04:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 06:17, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination National Park De Alde Feanen. Location, It Wikelslân. Nuphar lutea.
-
- Nomination Traffic signs in Malaysia: Warning sign "Obstacle, road diverges/splits" in Kimanis --Cccefalon 13:31, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Not sharp enough IMO. Mattbuck 20:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Disturbing background (the second sign). Standing a half a meter right would have been much better. -- DerFussi 12:31, 20 July 2014 (UTC) - Withdrawn I don't think, that the background part - which is neither overlapping nor in focus - is disturbing. It is not a studio shot. However, Matt is right, it is not sharp enough - that's reasonable enbough to withdraw. --Cccefalon 05:00, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Traffic signs in Malaysia: Warning sign "Obstacle, road diverges/splits" in Kimanis --Cccefalon 13:31, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Mallorca_-_Leuchtturm_am_Kap_Formentor15.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Lighthouse at Cap Formentor --Taxiarchos228 12:18, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Comment it's tilted Ezarate 14:02, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
it isn't --Taxiarchos228 20:06, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Clearly tilted. The sky is dirty: Noise. Perspective distortion. A bit blueish IMO. --Lmbuga 17:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC) - Comment Slight CCW Tilt and some dust spots in the sky could easily be repaired. -- Smial 23:20, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Jubilee Campus MMB X2 Newark Hall and International House.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Jubilee Campus. Mattbuck 05:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Needs more brightness IMO. -- Slaunger 20:46, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Done Mattbuck 22:26, 14 July 2014 (UTC) - Decline
SupportThe light is rather dull, but the shooter could do nothing about it, could he? --Stegop 04:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC) I must agree with the others on the blurr. --Stegop 23:04, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
OpposeYes, he could wait or chose another day... Anyway, I think that most of the picture is blurry, only the central part is sharp...--~~~~ - Oppose 1/4 right is blurred --Christian Ferrer 22:00, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose as for Christian. -- Smial 23:25, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Caen - Rennes 20140709 - Mexer.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Association football player Mexer (Edson André Sitoe), in Vire, France. --Buffoleo 13:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Decline With another crop, you could avoid the disturbing other persons. I made a proposal, see my annotation. --Cccefalon 14:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Done Thanks for your advice ! Buffoleo 16:18, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:05, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Not a sharp image. Very fuzzy lips or blurred lips. Not QI for me, sorry--Lmbuga 18:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Underexposed IMO--Lmbuga 18:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Oppose per Lmbuga. Focal shift – left ear is sharp, lips and nose aren’t. --Kreuzschnabel 20:30, 16 July 2014 (UTC) - Oppose Per others.--Jebulon 14:34, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? Joydeep 06:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Marennes_17_Coin_de_rue&cour_2014.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Street corner with old building and closed courtyard, Marennes, Charente-Maritime, France. --JLPC 13:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment I am sorry, anything really noteworthy: Out of scope IMO--Lmbuga 17:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Let's ask someone else. --JLPC 21:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC) - Support QI imo. --P e z i 09:01, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support Maybe a bit confusing, but technically very good. In scope: it remembers me my birth country, (normal: it is.). Typical architecture of the departement of Charente-Maritime.--Jebulon 14:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The pespective correction is "overdone", giving an unreal look. In such cases, a wee "convergence of verticals" should be kept to keep the image natural and here ther are "divergent verticals", like the photo was taken from up looking down. --Stegop (talk) 14:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- weak Support --Lmbuga 18:14, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- weak Support due to the aspect ration. (@Lmbuga: I move the weak. This confuses the bot :) ) -- DerFussi 19:26, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks--Lmbuga 20:59, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support QI for me. --Joydeep 06:50, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Joydeep 06:50, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Francia_vs_Portugal_-_2014_CERH_European_Championship_-_07.jpg
[edit]- Nomination France vs Portugal, 2014 CERH European Championship. --Kadellar 23:15, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose The head of the blue person is crossing the image border. --Cccefalon 05:48, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
But he is not the main subject. --Kadellar 09:21, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
He is interacting with the main person, so he is part of the topic "France vs. Portugal". Feel free to send to CR. --Cccefalon 10:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
I'd like to read more opinions if you don't mind. I understand yours, but imo the crop isn't so severe. File names are all in a row so I don't go crazy :P (but they're precise enough imo). --Kadellar 11:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Of course I don't mind. I cannot be right all the time Of course it was not the name of the file, but in my perception, the motif is about a duel between the two opponents. So in my understanding, the opponent in blue clothing should not touch the image border with his head. Yes, let's hear other reviewers, it might be interesting to listen their opinion. --Cccefalon 13:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC) - Oppose Per Cccefalon. a little less below = a little more above... This is a composition issue, IMO.--Jebulon 14:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Either the player in blue is part of the main subject, in which case his head should not be cut off, or he isn't part of the main subject, in which case he is too sharp and distracting. Unlucky composition. --Generic1139 (talk) 20:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- weak Support Somewhat overexposed, composition is ok, it's sports... -- Smial 21:42, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Porta_del_Carmine_Salo.jpg
[edit]- Nomination City gate "Porta del Carmine" in Salò --Moroder 18:08, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 05:12, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
{{weak oppose}}The top half is too bluish. The color of the sky is not vivid because the sky was darkened IMO (underexposed). Too tight at left--Lmbuga 11:39, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
CommentThe crop can be an opinion and a taste but if it does not take away something I don't see why it should not make the image eligible for QI. Underexposure is a fact and this sky is NOT underexposed --Moroder 14:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC) {{o|Strong oppose}}See what has been said before. I'm not sure how to say this (es: El edificio está cortado) in English, perhaps "leaning out at left (SEE NOTE)". --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 18:24, 17 July 2014 (UTC)- Done Changed crop, I got your point, thanks for the hint--Moroder 11:36, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks and sorry. Better now Support QI for me--Lmbuga 23:04, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Sarah_Chepchirchir_-_Paris_Half_Marathon_-_5222.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Sarah Chepchirchir, 3rd of the Paris Half Marathon 2014, crossing the arrival line --PierreSelim 14:13, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment I'm pretty sure it's tilted to the left.--Tupungato 08:47, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
I think it's ok. Mattbuck 21:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC) - Support It is a QI for me. Very nice "capture" and composition.--Jebulon 14:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support Very nice and good IMO--Lmbuga 18:28, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Christian Ferrer 11:11, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Joydeep 06:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)