Commons:Kandidater til fremragende billeder
Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文(中国大陆) | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/−
Dette er kandidater til at blive fremragende billeder. For et arkiv over tidligere nominerede billeder, se loggen. Der findes også en kronologisk liste over fremragende billeder.
Nominering
[edit]Hvis du tror at du har fundet eller gemt et meget godt billede, læg det til i sektionen for nominationer, øverst i listen, ved hjælp af dette link (hjælp). Du behøver ikke at have en konto – selv anonyme brugere kan nominere billeder.
Billedet som nomineres skal have en god beskrivelse og en god licens.
Afstemningsregler
[edit]- Aftenstemningen foregår i 9 dage; resultatet bliver fastsat den 10. dag.
- Eftersom et billede ikke har fået nogle positive stemmer fra andre end den som nominerede inden 5 dage, kan billedet fjernes fra listen.
- Nominationer fra anonyme brugere er tilladt.
- Bidrag til diskussioner fra anonyme brugere er tilladt.
- Stemmer fra anonyme brugere gælder ikke.
- En nomination gælder ikke som en stemme – den som nominerer har også stemmeret.
- Den som nominerer et billede kan når som helst fjerne nominationen.
En kandidat bliver et fremragende billede eftersom følgende krav mødes:
- Korrekt licens (selvsagt)
- Mindst fem stemmer for
- Et stemmeforhold på 2:1 (dobbelt så mange ja-stemmer som nej)
- To forskellige versioner af samme billede kan ikke blive fremragende; kun det med højest antal stemmer bliver valgt.
Stemning kan gøres med skabelonerne {{support}}
eller {{oppose}}
, neutralitet angives med {{neutral}}
.
Kandidater
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 19:11:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phalacrocoracidae (Cormorants)
- Info A widespread and sociable species; several FPs of individuals. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:11, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:11, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 19:01:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
- Info Endangered species with no FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 21:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 16:24:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People
- Info created by unknown - restored by Wcamp9 – uploaded byWcamp9 – nominated by Wcamp9 -- Wcamp9 (talk) 16:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Wcamp9 (talk) 16:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:35, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 14:13:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Russia
- Info Overall view of Solovetsky Monastery created by Новинская Г. - uploaded and nominated by FBilula (talk) 14:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 14:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose It makes me very sad to oppose this photo. The composition is wonderful, I love the reflections, I love the subject, I really like the boat in the foreground. At thumbnail size I was ready and eager to support. But at full size it is both badly oversharpened and noisy. Cmao20 (talk) 14:19, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I make Cmao20 words mine. FBilula, you nominate a lot of pictures to QI I'd expect that you have a feeling about quality (this is not) and usually I recommend you to nominate here only images that became QI Poco a poco (talk) 15:16, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 13:45:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Ukraine
- Info I know there are some blown highlights (though, the walls are white so there's not a lot of detail lost) but nevertheless I think in terms of composition this is an outstanding drone photo that gives us a privileged view of this interesting fifteenth century fortified monastery. created by Rbrechko – uploaded by Rbrechko – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for nomination. I've fixed blown highlights. --Rbrechko (talk) 14:18, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! Even better now. Cmao20 (talk) 15:03, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 13:23:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
- Info created by Kabelleger - uploaded by Kabelleger – nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support A splendid view Cmao20 (talk) 13:50, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support A little bit blurred, but anyway nice view. --Rbrechko (talk) 14:21, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Could perhaps be sharper but the scene is stunning.--Ermell (talk) 21:42, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 08:27:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info Princess Elizabeth of York — the future Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom — when she was seven years old. Oil on canvas, artist Philip de László. Created by Philip de László – uploaded by The Most Comfortable Chair – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 08:27, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 08:27, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent quality reproduction of a superb painting Cmao20 (talk) 13:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 21:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 05:53:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Switzerland
- Info Reformierte_Kirche_S-charl
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:05, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Very satisfying composition. Good quality and colours Cmao20 (talk) 13:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Splendid autumn scenery. --Rbrechko (talk) 14:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Water reflection of trees on islands with pirogue being careened at golden hour in Si Phan Don Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 04:59:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support the lack of a reflection near the right bothers me, but that's not really within your control. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 14:22, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 04:38:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
- Info Maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) at Parken Zoo, Eskilstuna, Sweden. Photo taken through a wire net fence. Created by Calle Eklund/V-wolf – uploaded by V-wolf (current user name Vivo) – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 04:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 04:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Really poor quality. Not even a QI for me. The background suffers from chroma noise and the animal is unsharp. For a zoo picture "taken through a wire net fence" it's quite disappointing -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but per Basile Morin. Nice composition and light but the quality is not good, too much chroma noise at full size, shadow detail lost (contrast overall too high), and low sharpness Cmao20 (talk) 13:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Zquid (talk) 15:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2025 at 15:18:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Phylum_:_Porifera
- Info Sea sponge (Cinachyra australiensis), Anilao, Philippines. Note: we have no FPs of the whole order Tetractinellida. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:18, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:18, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support High resolution and quality for an underwater image Cmao20 (talk) 15:40, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 21:17, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Link Cinachyra australiensis above goes to an empty page. Yann (talk) 21:18, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- True, I removed it Poco a poco (talk) 23:20, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Interesting biological shape, looking like a friend of virus SARS-CoV-2 :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2025 at 07:10:43
- Info This retouched version is broken. If you open both this and the original and switch between them a few times it's easy to see the problem: Perry's face is scaled down here (which itself might violate COM:BLP), leaving behind misalignment artifacts, most noticeably in the top left and top right of her hair where it meets the background. Additionally, her ear and chin aren't scaled down with the face, making them appear proportionally larger (for some reason, part of the earring is scaled, leaving it warped).
I'll be more than happy to abandon this in favor of a "delist and replace" if someone uploads a similar retouched version that doesn't have technical issues (I've asked the original editor if he could upload a corrected version but was denied). (Original nomination) - Delist -- AVDLCZ (talk) 07:10, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist per nomination. --Harlock81 (talk) 09:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist Clear technical problem. -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist Thank you, AVDLCZ --Poco a poco (talk) 12:23, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist per nomination. Very well observed. Cmao20 (talk) 15:40, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist --Thi (talk) 11:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist Wilfy ? --Mile (talk) 11:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist very definately. --Msb (talk) 14:27, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2025 at 04:56:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Daphniidae
- Info created by Janeklass – uploaded by Janeklass – nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 04:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 04:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Souvenir program for the première production of Gilbert and Sullivan's Patience - Cover.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2025 at 02:11:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera
- Info created by D'Oyly Carte Opera Company, printed by Clement Smith and Company, London, signed "J. W." – restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:11, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:11, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support We need an FP for every Savoy Opera! Cmao20 (talk) 15:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Looks like we'll have at least one for seven of the 14 after this (plus a number of related works like The Contrabandista and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern). Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:12, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Flight of Papilio polytes Linnaeus, 1758 - Common Mormon (Female) Form- romulus WLB IMG 9780a.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2025 at 01:45:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
- Info created by Sandipoutsider – uploaded by Sandipoutsider – nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 01:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 01:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 04:45, 11 January 2025 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Impressive capture but sorry, quality is too poor for FP Cmao20 (talk) 15:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 22:43:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2010-2019
- Info Memorial Ceremony at the Raoul Wallenberg square in Stockholm with Holocaust survivors. A participant shows number tattoo on the arm. 27 January 2013, International Holocaust Remembrance Day. Created by Lesula – uploaded by Lesula (Frankie Fouganthin - current user name FrankieF) – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 22:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 22:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Info I didn't know if I should have put this photo and File:Överlevande från förintelsen.jpg together as a set (I'm still new at this), but now I nominated the photos one by one. If you want, perhaps we can change? I also choosed gallery Historical#2010-2019 because showing Holocaust survivors. --Zquid (talk) 22:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment 3600 ISO, flash fired, harsh shadow, light reflection -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:32, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow effect with light or sharpness. The composition is not good. There is a problematic artifact above the arm. The person's head should have been captured. I agree that there is little opportunity to take a photo of a concentration camp prisoner tattoo, but the fact that it is a more dramatic historical fact cannot be put aside all other aesthetic criteria. Sorry. (And sorry for the English mistakes, I'm French). --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Zquid (talk) 04:05, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 22:37:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2010-2019
- Info Memorial Ceremony at the Raoul Wallenberg square in Stockholm with Holocaust survivors (one showing number tattoo on the arm). 27 January 2013, International Holocaust Remembrance Day. Created by Lesula – uploaded by Lesula (Frankie Fouganthin - current user name FrankieF – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Info I didn't know if I should have put this photo and File:Tatuerat fångnummer.jpg together as a set (I'm still new at this), but now I nominated the photos one by one. If you want, perhaps we can change? I also choosed gallery Historical#2010-2019 because showing Holocaust survivors. --Zquid (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Flash fired, cluttered composition with busy background, tight crop at the bottom. And are we sure these people want to be on Commons? (no {{PR}}) -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Let's ask the photographer... Pinging @FrankieF - do you remember the occasion and what the participants said about photos? (this and File:Tatuerat fångnummer.jpg) --Zquid (talk) 14:03, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Obviously I can't answer for FrankieF, but this is a public annual event (often with Swedish dignitaries present) where you are free to take photos, so much like this FP or this FP. The absent {{PR}} is probably just an oversight. Frankie is one of the top people-at-events photographers we have in the wiki-Sweden community, and he usually never adds that template to his photos. Just my 2 cents. --Cart (talk) 19:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Let's ask the photographer... Pinging @FrankieF - do you remember the occasion and what the participants said about photos? (this and File:Tatuerat fångnummer.jpg) --Zquid (talk) 14:03, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Zquid (talk) 04:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 19:05:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Atelidae_(Howler,_Spider_and_Woolly_Monkeys)
- Info Female, baby, and male Panamanian white-faced capuchins (Cebus imitator). I originally called this a "family," but apparently capuchins practice alloparenting, so it's hard to say. We got lucky catching a troop of maybe 25 individuals crossing a clearing between patches of forest. I uploaded some other shots, too, but I think this is the one with the best combination of detail and comp? Surprised by how few decent photos we have of these and other new world monkeys. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 19:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 19:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:37, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 17:09:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info There is already another FP of the Basilic but this is a vertical panorama with a very different angle not frequently exploited, which takes in the staircase on the right that leads towards the top. In the foreground, more shots were necessary in order to select the smallest number of people in the frame, together with scattered objects such as backpacks, water bottles and any other stuff removed. In fact, the grassy meadow on the left free and the empty staircase depicted are impossible to find at any time, even and especially on evenings and nights. Created, uploaded, nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 08:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:55, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Interesting composition Cmao20 (talk) 15:37, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 16:56:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info Marly Palace, en:Peterhof, Saint Petersburg created by Игорь Гордеев - uploaded and nominated by FBilula (talk) 16:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 16:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Love the details! Wolverine X-eye 20:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:12, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support But a bit oversharpened --Llez (talk) 07:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:26, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 08:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Very nice but chromatic aberrations and overshapened, yes, as noticed by Llez -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:41, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Excellent composition and colours outweighs quality issues Cmao20 (talk) 15:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Agree, the processing is not good and the building is overexposed. The compo is great, though. Poco a poco (talk) 15:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 12:31:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Posters and advertisements
- Info created by James Gillray, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Info Satirical caricature about the fight between the British and the French over Malta. The cartoonist has misplaced Malta, possibly confusing its location with that of Cyprus.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 12:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 17:21, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:57, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 05:50:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Russulaceae
- Info Russula, oddly shaped Russula in decline. Focus stack of 146 photos. This Russula dies back in beautiful colors and contributes to biodiversity.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent focus stack Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 17:23, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support That's looking pretty good. Wolverine X-eye 20:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Focus stacking issue on the yellow leaf (image note added) and other places, for example at the lower right corner -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. But sorry, I don't see any mistakes in the yellow half-decayed leaf. The further away the leaf is from the camera (so behind the mushroom) the leaf fades. That was also the intention. I took the first photo of the rear tip of the mushroom and then further forward so that the entire mushroom (so the object) was sharp. I think that worked out well.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:19, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry but the top of that leaf is in focus, while the bottom is blurry, all around the mushroom. You might have a frame in your batch with that leaf in focus. Then please, fix the issue on a software. Best regards -- -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:34, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have 146 photos each with a space of half a millimeter between them of the mushroom. There is no sharp leaf that you mean in between. That is not possible because that part of the leaf is behind the mushroom. Only the forward curled ends of the leaf were captured by the camera at f/5.6.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Basile and would agree with trying to correct the focus issue. IMO still think this is an impressive image and support for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:04, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 01:47:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1800-1849
- Info created by Léon Sabatier after Louis Le Breton and Auguste Étienne François Mayer - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Really interesting and beautiful artwork Cmao20 (talk) 03:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 17:25, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 23:28:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
- Info created by Petrovskyz – uploaded by Petrovskyz – nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I think this motif has potential but it seems tilted and not centred, so I'm not sure the composition is quite there for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 03:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done I've corrected the tilt and centred the picture.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Perspective correction necessary. The boards on the right and left run slantwise inwards. --Llez (talk) 07:55, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:44, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
File:005c Greater flamingos courtship display in the Camargue during mating season Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 21:57:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
- Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice posture, interresting light and high level of detail of a bird in its natural environment. I've suggested a crop (see image note) with less empty space around -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done Thank you for the review, crop done, new version uploaded -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:54, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent light and superb quality Cmao20 (talk) 03:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 17:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Funny stance, almost looks like it's dancing. Wolverine X-eye 20:52, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- It's because it's actually a dance move part of it's courtship display ;) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:46, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:27, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:37, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:04, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:41, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:47, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support very rare capture of a nice posture. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:08, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 21:20:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Order_:_Chiroptera_(Bats)
- Info Proboscis bats (Rhynchonycteris naso), also known as long-nosed bats, resting on a branch during the day in Alajuela Province, Costa Rica. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note - There is another active nomination of this subject, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Proboscis bats (81745).jpg. It was suggested there that this shot may be preferable. As it's a totally different photo (not another version of the same photo), it does not quality as an alternative in the same nom. Figured I'd just nominate it separately to see what happens. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Update: Withdrew the other one, as there seems like a clear preference for this one. — Rhododendrites talk | 19:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support They are both FP. If the consensus is that only one should be promoted, I'll change my vote and strike my support on whichever has the least support. Cmao20 (talk) 21:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support These bats look like natural branches of a tree. And I find this picture better than the other one, due to a more appealing light, higher level of detail, and a great background, that makes the subject standing out visually. -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I prefer this one and -as I would do with an alt- oppose the other one. Poco a poco (talk) 22:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:05, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:44, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 19:48:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
- Info I thought this was a great composition, with the sweeping curves of the platform and the Moscow Leningradskaya Hotel, an important and historic landmark, in the background. Created by Mike1979 Russia – uploaded by Mike1979 Russia – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Simply stunning! Wolverine X-eye 20:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. I agree the composition is well balanced, and find the light compelling -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yaqub Qomarudin Dibiazah (talk) 11:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Quality is exellent, but I miss wow factor here. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:06, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 18:02:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Agamidae (Dragon Lizards)
- Info created by Blackmysterieux – nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Very good find, however, I had to correct the gallery for you, it would be appreciated if you could make sure that's correct in future. Cmao20 (talk) 19:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The shadows ruin this image for me. Wolverine X-eye 20:27, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:07, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Is that noise around the eye? Poco a poco (talk) 15:50, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:07, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 16:14:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
- Info The flooded bell tower of St. Nicholas Cathedral. Kalyazin. Tver region, Russia. All by Елена Нечипоренко -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 16:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 16:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Stunning motif and composition, but it seems tilted to me Cmao20 (talk) 19:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, the water is not horizontal -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, you were right. I fixed it Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 07:25, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much Cmao20 (talk) 14:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:15, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:47, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:08, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:34, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Exposure management and detail not the best, but the motif and compo are extraordinary Poco a poco (talk) 15:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Poco -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:58, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 11:15, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 14:58:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train_stations
- Info: Riomaggiore railway station, Liguria, Italy. Second nomination; redeveloped to improve fidelity. Also visible is the Via dell'Amore coastal path, which is quite prone to rockslides due to the nearly vertical bedding of the cliffs. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:49, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment It looks Overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:42, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose When you superimpose this picture to this one from the history, it's very clear that the post-treatment has gone too far. Also an image from 2016 of low quality, sorry. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Impressive; if it is overprocessed, it don't bother me. —Bruce1eetalk 07:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:46, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:03, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:31, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The view is great but it isn't even a QI, do you have similar images with more detail? Poco a poco (talk) 15:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose overprocessing very visible. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 10:35:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Hesse
- Info The Rhön Mountains seen from the west (Horst). All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 10:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 10:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Not just a large panorama but a satisfying composition too Cmao20 (talk) 14:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 18:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support This panorama is best appreciated by looking at it with the zoomviewer tool. Terragio67 (talk) 17:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:46, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:29, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:29, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Three golden statues of the Buddha at Wat Mai with colorful clouds at sunset in Luang Prabang Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 02:23:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful place, excellent light Cmao20 (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 16:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Cmao20. -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:36, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:27, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I'd though warm the WB a bit Poco a poco (talk) 16:07, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:10, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 12:10, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 01:24:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1880-1889
- Info created by Charles Milton Bell – uploaded and restored by Wcamp9 – nominated by Wcamp9 -- Wcamp9 (talk) 01:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Wcamp9 (talk) 01:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Not with this yellow tint. Yann (talk) 09:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The yellow is too prominent. Wolverine X-eye 20:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Black-and-white version
[edit]- Support - Wcamp9 (talk) 03:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- May I suggest that you adjust the contrast? Yann (talk) 09:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose We should not get in the habit of treating "make historic image black and white" as if that's a good thing, or a default improvement. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: No chance to succeed. Yann (talk) 09:31, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2025 at 15:30:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Cheloniidae (Sea Turtles)
- Info Portrait of a Hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata), Ad Dimaniyat Islands, Oman. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice face. Wolverine X-eye 18:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Another one for the 'featured pictures that could be repurposed as memes' category. Seriously though, excellent quality and detail Cmao20 (talk) 20:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support What a look. – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 18:46, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I am not so happy with colors (WB). --Mile (talk) 11:16, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2025 at 09:52:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Switzerland
- Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Some technical limitations due to an old drone sensor but the overall composition, light and colors are beautiful to me. Also, this is a shot from a unique perspective that can't be reproduced because it's not possible to fly a drone there anymore due to a change of regulation (it was previously only possible with drones bellow 500g like the Mavic Air used for this) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:11, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Now that's a high vantage point. Wolverine X-eye 18:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 19:50, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. Excellent weather and superb composition from this special viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:37, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Indeed very beautiful colours, light, and composition; we can excuse the technical limitations thanks to these virtues and to the special situation (it’s a pity about all these excessive drone regulations). – Aristeas (talk) 10:05, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 16:18, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:06, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:10, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 17:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2025 at 08:47:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Conidae
- Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 08:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Pretty shell, usual great quality Cmao20 (talk) 14:11, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I love them shells. Wolverine X-eye 18:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 15:37, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:39, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 04:46, 11 January 2025 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:07, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2025 at 13:37:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
- Info I thought this was a superb composition with magical light. No similar FPs. created by Aristeas – uploaded by Aristeas – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 15:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 16:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good choice. Wolverine X-eye 20:42, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition with the water in front, mirror effect and good weather. (The blurred face at the right is fortunately very small, almost invisible, perhaps it was not even necessary.) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:06, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much for the nomination, Cmao20, and all of you for your support! – Aristeas (talk) 11:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:37, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice shot, was passing that bridge in winter. --Mile (talk) 11:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 16:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 00:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:08, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:12, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2025 at 12:41:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Siberian Federal District
- Info created and uploaded by Alexandr frolov – nominated by AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:41, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:41, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral Really nice photo and composition, but IMHO too much saturation in the sky (with a cyan colour prevalence) makes it an ordinary one, sorry. Terragio67 (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Beautiful composition and impressive landscape. But I understand Terragio67’s concerns about the sky: these pure colours look somewhat artificial to me. – Aristeas (talk) 09:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Per above and on top of that I find the level of detail not really FP-worthy Poco a poco (talk) 16:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral – sky colours feel unnatural. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:12, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2025 at 10:30:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Others
- Info created by Shufu Liu, uploaded by 鐵路1, nominated by Yann
- Info Rescue workers near the semi-collapsed ten-story Uranus Building on Xuanyuan Road after the 2024 Hualien earthquake.
- Support Average quality, but can't be taken again, and a lot of wow. -- Yann (talk) 10:30, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--🚊。鐵路Railway Talk 11:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose No, definitely not with that problem of perspective, which gives the impression that all the buildings are collapsing, while in fact there is only one in the center. But believe it or not, I was working on a derivative version of this file on my computer to propose a "delist and replace" nomination on en-Wikipedia. In addition to this major problem of perspective, the sky is horribly dotted with many dust spots. The resolution is not great and I'm not sure that, even with these corrections, it can become a FP on Commons. Still, I'm going to upload another version soon, so you can compare. To finish, I'm not sure the file name, that translates into "04.03 The Vice President went to Hualien to learn about the disaster situation and rescue progress - 53629407644" really describes the image. I don't think the Vice President is a fireman :-) Best regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done: File:Rescue workers near the semi-collapsed ten-story Uranus Building on Xuanyuan Road after the 2024 Hualien earthquake.jpg -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- {{Support}} only perspective corrected version; Oppose original version. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:43, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- AirshipJungleman29, your (double) vote will be invalid for the User:FPCBot we use here for the result. There is no alternative yet, thus I've fixed your (invalid) support. -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:48, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Update: Now Yann has added the alt, AirshipJungleman29, you are free to cast your green support below. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose this version but would support Basile's version. The perspective problems in this one are the killer. If you're illustrating a collapsing building you really need to aim for realism. With no perspective correction it genuinely looks like all the buildings are damaged and leaning. Cmao20 (talk) 13:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose against, subject very interesting but "it would be possible to take a better photo" => there are some stain on the tract-sin. Olivier LPB (talk) 15:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]- Support --Yann (talk) 14:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:32, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Better focus on the central theme.--Paracel63 (talk) 17:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per above. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:05, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:34, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much for the editing, Basile! – Aristeas (talk) 19:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 21:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 02:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cool stuff Poco a poco (talk) 16:11, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 07:56:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Monarchidae (Monarch Flycatchers)
- Info created and uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Kaim Amin -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Too much empty space IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 12:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support A square crop would improve this one, but still good Cmao20 (talk) 13:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Info Kaim Amin, I have made a cropped version of this image that reduces the amount of empty space here. If you like this version and think it would improve this nomination's chances of success, I can add it as an alternative? Cmao20 (talk) 21:46, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Cmao20, Sure go ahead. I wasn't sure how to do it otherwise I'd have done it myself. — Kaim Amin (talk) 09:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support (would also support crop) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:03, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 02:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Alternative version
[edit]- Support . Pinging Kaim Amin, Poco a poco, Giles Laurent, Harlock81 to notify about alternative version. Cmao20 (talk) 13:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for pinging me. I prefer the first one, but my support is for both versions. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the ping Cmao20 but as Poco a Poco says I think the image needs lead room on the left. I would support an alternative with square crop that has more lead room to the left or an alternative with a crop with same format as the original but with less space at top and left or an alternative horizontal 4:3 format -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for pinging me. I prefer the first one, but my support is for both versions. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I'd have left a bit more of space as lead room on the left but I still prefer this one. Thank you for the alt version, Cmao20 --Poco a poco (talk) 23:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Not a fan of this crop. If anything, a slight from to the left and the top of the original, but I prefer as is. — Rhododendrites talk | 02:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Vulcan supports both version –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2025 at 14:27:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia
- Info: Peace River Valley in autumn colours; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful panorama and I love the subtle changes in the landscape across its span Cmao20 (talk) 18:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Oh my. Wolverine X-eye 20:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:54, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful panorama and also interesting due to the disposition of the clouds caused by the particular orography of the area. --Terragio67 (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I love the photo (and don't want to be pixel-peeper), but there are some stitching errors in the image (blurry areas). See notes (probably I haven't catched all of them). — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:07, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Reading the comments on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kiskatinaw River Bridge.jpg – it could be caused by some optical distortion of your lens, because there is striking difference of sharpness in the panorama. — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- You're correct, the unsharp areas are the artifacts of the lens, not the stitcher. I took care of the most problematic parts prior to nominating. I'm currently travelling with a small laptop, and, unfortunately, I won't be able to edit this immediately. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Reading the comments on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kiskatinaw River Bridge.jpg – it could be caused by some optical distortion of your lens, because there is striking difference of sharpness in the panorama. — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 22:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Until it's fixed. — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2025 at 08:11:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Spain
- Info created & uploaded by Mikipons – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 08:11, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:11, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
SupportGood composition and light Cmao20 (talk) 12:46, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Per below, I think it's bad cloning rather than the sky being replaced - can't see any issues elsewhere along the horizon that suggest the image is a composite - but yes, unfortunately noticeable, likely to be building work. Cmao20 (talk) 17:21, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 13:44, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Support Amazing light.--Rbrechko (talk) 19:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- per Charlesjsharp --Rbrechko (talk) 19:18, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:24, 4 January 2025 (UTC)SupportAppealing composition, interesting building and compelling light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 5 January 2025 (UTC)- Support --Llez (talk) 09:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Support--Mile (talk) 10:07, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Times have come, where you must check each pixel. @Charlesjsharp ping the voters. --Mile (talk) 11:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose No response to identification of editing flaws. And as requested: @Tomer T, Agnes Monkelbaan, Giles Laurent, Rbrechko, Ermell, and Llez: @SHB2000, Crisco 1492, Poco a poco, Famberhorst, Aristeas, and Paracel63: Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:52, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Will also Weak oppose per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:26, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Support— Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)SupportPoco a poco (talk) 12:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC)- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral It's a pity that the sky is oversaturated a bit, IMO. — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Weak supportBeautiful view, good light. There are traces of rather coarse masking (with double contours) at the border of the sky in the top-right corner. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Like Cmao20 above (and my own original remark), I am not sure whether the sky has been replaced or just edited in a rather coarse manner, but the artifacts at the border to the sky are certainly irritating. – Aristeas (talk) 20:22, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 18:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Temporary oppose. There is a significant amount of sky replacement. See notes. Some work was done because of cranes in 2008. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Charles. --Milseburg (talk) 10:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose For now. We need a clarification by the author Poco a poco (talk) 23:08, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2025 at 04:55:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#India
- Info C, U & N by iMahesh (talk) 04:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support For me this is a somewhat oppressive recording.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Striking perspective, good quality Cmao20 (talk) 12:45, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 13:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:41, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose whatever that thing at the back right is really distracting for an FP. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi there, I attempted to remove it using Photoshop, but when I zoom in, the modification is visible. iMahesh (talk) 10:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Interesting architecture, narrow space handled well with good perspective. Took the liberty to change the gallery link slightly because the photo shows the interior of a religious building. – Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. iMahesh (talk) 10:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Fjernelse af fremragende-status
[edit]Nogle gange hænder det at statussen for fremragende billeder ændres. Billeder som tidligere var god nok, vil ikke længere blive anset som det. Her listes billeder som du ikke længere synes fortjener at være det. Da trænges to tredels majoritet (og mindst fem stemmer) som er enig i at fjerne statussen fra billedet. Eftersom ikke to tredele af stemmerne er enig i at fjerne statussen, bliver den beholdt. Her stemmer man med {{keep}}
(behold billedet som fremragende) eller {{delist}}
(billedet fortjener ikke længere at være fremragende). Når du nominerer et billede her, tag med linket til den oprindelige nomination (den findes under Links på billedtes beskrivelsesside. Brug dette link for at lægge til en fjerningskandidat.
Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 19:11:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phalacrocoracidae (Cormorants)
- Info A widespread and sociable species; several FPs of individuals. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:11, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:11, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 19:01:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
- Info Endangered species with no FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 21:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 16:24:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People
- Info created by unknown - restored by Wcamp9 – uploaded byWcamp9 – nominated by Wcamp9 -- Wcamp9 (talk) 16:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Wcamp9 (talk) 16:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:35, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 14:13:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Russia
- Info Overall view of Solovetsky Monastery created by Новинская Г. - uploaded and nominated by FBilula (talk) 14:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 14:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose It makes me very sad to oppose this photo. The composition is wonderful, I love the reflections, I love the subject, I really like the boat in the foreground. At thumbnail size I was ready and eager to support. But at full size it is both badly oversharpened and noisy. Cmao20 (talk) 14:19, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I make Cmao20 words mine. FBilula, you nominate a lot of pictures to QI I'd expect that you have a feeling about quality (this is not) and usually I recommend you to nominate here only images that became QI Poco a poco (talk) 15:16, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 13:45:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Ukraine
- Info I know there are some blown highlights (though, the walls are white so there's not a lot of detail lost) but nevertheless I think in terms of composition this is an outstanding drone photo that gives us a privileged view of this interesting fifteenth century fortified monastery. created by Rbrechko – uploaded by Rbrechko – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for nomination. I've fixed blown highlights. --Rbrechko (talk) 14:18, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! Even better now. Cmao20 (talk) 15:03, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 13:23:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
- Info created by Kabelleger - uploaded by Kabelleger – nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support A splendid view Cmao20 (talk) 13:50, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support A little bit blurred, but anyway nice view. --Rbrechko (talk) 14:21, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Could perhaps be sharper but the scene is stunning.--Ermell (talk) 21:42, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 08:27:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info Princess Elizabeth of York — the future Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom — when she was seven years old. Oil on canvas, artist Philip de László. Created by Philip de László – uploaded by The Most Comfortable Chair – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 08:27, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 08:27, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent quality reproduction of a superb painting Cmao20 (talk) 13:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 21:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 05:53:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Switzerland
- Info Reformierte_Kirche_S-charl
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:05, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Very satisfying composition. Good quality and colours Cmao20 (talk) 13:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Splendid autumn scenery. --Rbrechko (talk) 14:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Water reflection of trees on islands with pirogue being careened at golden hour in Si Phan Don Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 04:59:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support the lack of a reflection near the right bothers me, but that's not really within your control. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 14:22, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 04:38:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
- Info Maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) at Parken Zoo, Eskilstuna, Sweden. Photo taken through a wire net fence. Created by Calle Eklund/V-wolf – uploaded by V-wolf (current user name Vivo) – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 04:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 04:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Really poor quality. Not even a QI for me. The background suffers from chroma noise and the animal is unsharp. For a zoo picture "taken through a wire net fence" it's quite disappointing -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but per Basile Morin. Nice composition and light but the quality is not good, too much chroma noise at full size, shadow detail lost (contrast overall too high), and low sharpness Cmao20 (talk) 13:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Zquid (talk) 15:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2025 at 15:18:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Phylum_:_Porifera
- Info Sea sponge (Cinachyra australiensis), Anilao, Philippines. Note: we have no FPs of the whole order Tetractinellida. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:18, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:18, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support High resolution and quality for an underwater image Cmao20 (talk) 15:40, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 21:17, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Link Cinachyra australiensis above goes to an empty page. Yann (talk) 21:18, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- True, I removed it Poco a poco (talk) 23:20, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Interesting biological shape, looking like a friend of virus SARS-CoV-2 :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2025 at 07:10:43
- Info This retouched version is broken. If you open both this and the original and switch between them a few times it's easy to see the problem: Perry's face is scaled down here (which itself might violate COM:BLP), leaving behind misalignment artifacts, most noticeably in the top left and top right of her hair where it meets the background. Additionally, her ear and chin aren't scaled down with the face, making them appear proportionally larger (for some reason, part of the earring is scaled, leaving it warped).
I'll be more than happy to abandon this in favor of a "delist and replace" if someone uploads a similar retouched version that doesn't have technical issues (I've asked the original editor if he could upload a corrected version but was denied). (Original nomination) - Delist -- AVDLCZ (talk) 07:10, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist per nomination. --Harlock81 (talk) 09:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist Clear technical problem. -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist Thank you, AVDLCZ --Poco a poco (talk) 12:23, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist per nomination. Very well observed. Cmao20 (talk) 15:40, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist --Thi (talk) 11:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist Wilfy ? --Mile (talk) 11:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist very definately. --Msb (talk) 14:27, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2025 at 04:56:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Daphniidae
- Info created by Janeklass – uploaded by Janeklass – nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 04:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 04:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Souvenir program for the première production of Gilbert and Sullivan's Patience - Cover.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2025 at 02:11:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera
- Info created by D'Oyly Carte Opera Company, printed by Clement Smith and Company, London, signed "J. W." – restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:11, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:11, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support We need an FP for every Savoy Opera! Cmao20 (talk) 15:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Looks like we'll have at least one for seven of the 14 after this (plus a number of related works like The Contrabandista and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern). Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:12, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Flight of Papilio polytes Linnaeus, 1758 - Common Mormon (Female) Form- romulus WLB IMG 9780a.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2025 at 01:45:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
- Info created by Sandipoutsider – uploaded by Sandipoutsider – nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 01:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 01:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 04:45, 11 January 2025 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Impressive capture but sorry, quality is too poor for FP Cmao20 (talk) 15:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 22:43:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2010-2019
- Info Memorial Ceremony at the Raoul Wallenberg square in Stockholm with Holocaust survivors. A participant shows number tattoo on the arm. 27 January 2013, International Holocaust Remembrance Day. Created by Lesula – uploaded by Lesula (Frankie Fouganthin - current user name FrankieF) – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 22:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 22:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Info I didn't know if I should have put this photo and File:Överlevande från förintelsen.jpg together as a set (I'm still new at this), but now I nominated the photos one by one. If you want, perhaps we can change? I also choosed gallery Historical#2010-2019 because showing Holocaust survivors. --Zquid (talk) 22:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment 3600 ISO, flash fired, harsh shadow, light reflection -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:32, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow effect with light or sharpness. The composition is not good. There is a problematic artifact above the arm. The person's head should have been captured. I agree that there is little opportunity to take a photo of a concentration camp prisoner tattoo, but the fact that it is a more dramatic historical fact cannot be put aside all other aesthetic criteria. Sorry. (And sorry for the English mistakes, I'm French). --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Zquid (talk) 04:05, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 22:37:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2010-2019
- Info Memorial Ceremony at the Raoul Wallenberg square in Stockholm with Holocaust survivors (one showing number tattoo on the arm). 27 January 2013, International Holocaust Remembrance Day. Created by Lesula – uploaded by Lesula (Frankie Fouganthin - current user name FrankieF – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Info I didn't know if I should have put this photo and File:Tatuerat fångnummer.jpg together as a set (I'm still new at this), but now I nominated the photos one by one. If you want, perhaps we can change? I also choosed gallery Historical#2010-2019 because showing Holocaust survivors. --Zquid (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Flash fired, cluttered composition with busy background, tight crop at the bottom. And are we sure these people want to be on Commons? (no {{PR}}) -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Let's ask the photographer... Pinging @FrankieF - do you remember the occasion and what the participants said about photos? (this and File:Tatuerat fångnummer.jpg) --Zquid (talk) 14:03, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Obviously I can't answer for FrankieF, but this is a public annual event (often with Swedish dignitaries present) where you are free to take photos, so much like this FP or this FP. The absent {{PR}} is probably just an oversight. Frankie is one of the top people-at-events photographers we have in the wiki-Sweden community, and he usually never adds that template to his photos. Just my 2 cents. --Cart (talk) 19:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Let's ask the photographer... Pinging @FrankieF - do you remember the occasion and what the participants said about photos? (this and File:Tatuerat fångnummer.jpg) --Zquid (talk) 14:03, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Zquid (talk) 04:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 19:05:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Atelidae_(Howler,_Spider_and_Woolly_Monkeys)
- Info Female, baby, and male Panamanian white-faced capuchins (Cebus imitator). I originally called this a "family," but apparently capuchins practice alloparenting, so it's hard to say. We got lucky catching a troop of maybe 25 individuals crossing a clearing between patches of forest. I uploaded some other shots, too, but I think this is the one with the best combination of detail and comp? Surprised by how few decent photos we have of these and other new world monkeys. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 19:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 19:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:37, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 17:09:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info There is already another FP of the Basilic but this is a vertical panorama with a very different angle not frequently exploited, which takes in the staircase on the right that leads towards the top. In the foreground, more shots were necessary in order to select the smallest number of people in the frame, together with scattered objects such as backpacks, water bottles and any other stuff removed. In fact, the grassy meadow on the left free and the empty staircase depicted are impossible to find at any time, even and especially on evenings and nights. Created, uploaded, nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 08:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:55, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Interesting composition Cmao20 (talk) 15:37, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 16:56:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info Marly Palace, en:Peterhof, Saint Petersburg created by Игорь Гордеев - uploaded and nominated by FBilula (talk) 16:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 16:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Love the details! Wolverine X-eye 20:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:12, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support But a bit oversharpened --Llez (talk) 07:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:26, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 08:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Very nice but chromatic aberrations and overshapened, yes, as noticed by Llez -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:41, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Excellent composition and colours outweighs quality issues Cmao20 (talk) 15:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Agree, the processing is not good and the building is overexposed. The compo is great, though. Poco a poco (talk) 15:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 12:31:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Posters and advertisements
- Info created by James Gillray, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Info Satirical caricature about the fight between the British and the French over Malta. The cartoonist has misplaced Malta, possibly confusing its location with that of Cyprus.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 12:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 17:21, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:57, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 05:50:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Russulaceae
- Info Russula, oddly shaped Russula in decline. Focus stack of 146 photos. This Russula dies back in beautiful colors and contributes to biodiversity.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent focus stack Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 17:23, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support That's looking pretty good. Wolverine X-eye 20:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Focus stacking issue on the yellow leaf (image note added) and other places, for example at the lower right corner -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. But sorry, I don't see any mistakes in the yellow half-decayed leaf. The further away the leaf is from the camera (so behind the mushroom) the leaf fades. That was also the intention. I took the first photo of the rear tip of the mushroom and then further forward so that the entire mushroom (so the object) was sharp. I think that worked out well.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:19, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry but the top of that leaf is in focus, while the bottom is blurry, all around the mushroom. You might have a frame in your batch with that leaf in focus. Then please, fix the issue on a software. Best regards -- -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:34, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have 146 photos each with a space of half a millimeter between them of the mushroom. There is no sharp leaf that you mean in between. That is not possible because that part of the leaf is behind the mushroom. Only the forward curled ends of the leaf were captured by the camera at f/5.6.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Basile and would agree with trying to correct the focus issue. IMO still think this is an impressive image and support for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:04, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2025 at 01:47:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1800-1849
- Info created by Léon Sabatier after Louis Le Breton and Auguste Étienne François Mayer - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Really interesting and beautiful artwork Cmao20 (talk) 03:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 17:25, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 23:28:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
- Info created by Petrovskyz – uploaded by Petrovskyz – nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I think this motif has potential but it seems tilted and not centred, so I'm not sure the composition is quite there for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 03:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done I've corrected the tilt and centred the picture.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Perspective correction necessary. The boards on the right and left run slantwise inwards. --Llez (talk) 07:55, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:44, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
File:005c Greater flamingos courtship display in the Camargue during mating season Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 21:57:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
- Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice posture, interresting light and high level of detail of a bird in its natural environment. I've suggested a crop (see image note) with less empty space around -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done Thank you for the review, crop done, new version uploaded -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:54, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent light and superb quality Cmao20 (talk) 03:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 17:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Funny stance, almost looks like it's dancing. Wolverine X-eye 20:52, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- It's because it's actually a dance move part of it's courtship display ;) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:46, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:27, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:37, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:04, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:41, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:47, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support very rare capture of a nice posture. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:08, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 21:20:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Order_:_Chiroptera_(Bats)
- Info Proboscis bats (Rhynchonycteris naso), also known as long-nosed bats, resting on a branch during the day in Alajuela Province, Costa Rica. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note - There is another active nomination of this subject, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Proboscis bats (81745).jpg. It was suggested there that this shot may be preferable. As it's a totally different photo (not another version of the same photo), it does not quality as an alternative in the same nom. Figured I'd just nominate it separately to see what happens. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Update: Withdrew the other one, as there seems like a clear preference for this one. — Rhododendrites talk | 19:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support They are both FP. If the consensus is that only one should be promoted, I'll change my vote and strike my support on whichever has the least support. Cmao20 (talk) 21:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support These bats look like natural branches of a tree. And I find this picture better than the other one, due to a more appealing light, higher level of detail, and a great background, that makes the subject standing out visually. -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I prefer this one and -as I would do with an alt- oppose the other one. Poco a poco (talk) 22:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:05, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:44, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 19:48:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
- Info I thought this was a great composition, with the sweeping curves of the platform and the Moscow Leningradskaya Hotel, an important and historic landmark, in the background. Created by Mike1979 Russia – uploaded by Mike1979 Russia – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Simply stunning! Wolverine X-eye 20:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. I agree the composition is well balanced, and find the light compelling -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yaqub Qomarudin Dibiazah (talk) 11:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Quality is exellent, but I miss wow factor here. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:06, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 18:02:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Agamidae (Dragon Lizards)
- Info created by Blackmysterieux – nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Very good find, however, I had to correct the gallery for you, it would be appreciated if you could make sure that's correct in future. Cmao20 (talk) 19:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The shadows ruin this image for me. Wolverine X-eye 20:27, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:07, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Is that noise around the eye? Poco a poco (talk) 15:50, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:07, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 16:14:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
- Info The flooded bell tower of St. Nicholas Cathedral. Kalyazin. Tver region, Russia. All by Елена Нечипоренко -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 16:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 16:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Stunning motif and composition, but it seems tilted to me Cmao20 (talk) 19:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, the water is not horizontal -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, you were right. I fixed it Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 07:25, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much Cmao20 (talk) 14:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:15, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:47, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:08, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:34, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Exposure management and detail not the best, but the motif and compo are extraordinary Poco a poco (talk) 15:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Poco -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:58, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 11:15, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 14:58:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train_stations
- Info: Riomaggiore railway station, Liguria, Italy. Second nomination; redeveloped to improve fidelity. Also visible is the Via dell'Amore coastal path, which is quite prone to rockslides due to the nearly vertical bedding of the cliffs. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:49, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment It looks Overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:42, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose When you superimpose this picture to this one from the history, it's very clear that the post-treatment has gone too far. Also an image from 2016 of low quality, sorry. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Impressive; if it is overprocessed, it don't bother me. —Bruce1eetalk 07:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:46, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:03, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:31, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The view is great but it isn't even a QI, do you have similar images with more detail? Poco a poco (talk) 15:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose overprocessing very visible. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 10:35:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Hesse
- Info The Rhön Mountains seen from the west (Horst). All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 10:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 10:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Not just a large panorama but a satisfying composition too Cmao20 (talk) 14:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 18:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support This panorama is best appreciated by looking at it with the zoomviewer tool. Terragio67 (talk) 17:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:46, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:29, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:29, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Three golden statues of the Buddha at Wat Mai with colorful clouds at sunset in Luang Prabang Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 02:23:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful place, excellent light Cmao20 (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 16:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Cmao20. -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:36, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:27, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I'd though warm the WB a bit Poco a poco (talk) 16:07, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:10, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 12:10, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2025 at 01:24:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1880-1889
- Info created by Charles Milton Bell – uploaded and restored by Wcamp9 – nominated by Wcamp9 -- Wcamp9 (talk) 01:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Wcamp9 (talk) 01:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Not with this yellow tint. Yann (talk) 09:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The yellow is too prominent. Wolverine X-eye 20:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Black-and-white version
[edit]- Support - Wcamp9 (talk) 03:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- May I suggest that you adjust the contrast? Yann (talk) 09:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose We should not get in the habit of treating "make historic image black and white" as if that's a good thing, or a default improvement. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: No chance to succeed. Yann (talk) 09:31, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2025 at 15:30:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Cheloniidae (Sea Turtles)
- Info Portrait of a Hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata), Ad Dimaniyat Islands, Oman. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice face. Wolverine X-eye 18:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Another one for the 'featured pictures that could be repurposed as memes' category. Seriously though, excellent quality and detail Cmao20 (talk) 20:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support What a look. – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 18:46, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I am not so happy with colors (WB). --Mile (talk) 11:16, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2025 at 09:52:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Switzerland
- Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Some technical limitations due to an old drone sensor but the overall composition, light and colors are beautiful to me. Also, this is a shot from a unique perspective that can't be reproduced because it's not possible to fly a drone there anymore due to a change of regulation (it was previously only possible with drones bellow 500g like the Mavic Air used for this) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:11, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Now that's a high vantage point. Wolverine X-eye 18:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 19:50, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. Excellent weather and superb composition from this special viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:37, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Indeed very beautiful colours, light, and composition; we can excuse the technical limitations thanks to these virtues and to the special situation (it’s a pity about all these excessive drone regulations). – Aristeas (talk) 10:05, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 16:18, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:06, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:10, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 17:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2025 at 08:47:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Conidae
- Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 08:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Pretty shell, usual great quality Cmao20 (talk) 14:11, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I love them shells. Wolverine X-eye 18:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 15:37, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:39, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 04:46, 11 January 2025 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:07, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2025 at 13:37:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
- Info I thought this was a superb composition with magical light. No similar FPs. created by Aristeas – uploaded by Aristeas – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 15:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 16:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good choice. Wolverine X-eye 20:42, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition with the water in front, mirror effect and good weather. (The blurred face at the right is fortunately very small, almost invisible, perhaps it was not even necessary.) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:06, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much for the nomination, Cmao20, and all of you for your support! – Aristeas (talk) 11:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:37, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice shot, was passing that bridge in winter. --Mile (talk) 11:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 16:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 00:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:08, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:12, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2025 at 12:41:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Siberian Federal District
- Info created and uploaded by Alexandr frolov – nominated by AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:41, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:41, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral Really nice photo and composition, but IMHO too much saturation in the sky (with a cyan colour prevalence) makes it an ordinary one, sorry. Terragio67 (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Beautiful composition and impressive landscape. But I understand Terragio67’s concerns about the sky: these pure colours look somewhat artificial to me. – Aristeas (talk) 09:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Per above and on top of that I find the level of detail not really FP-worthy Poco a poco (talk) 16:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral – sky colours feel unnatural. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:12, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2025 at 10:30:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Others
- Info created by Shufu Liu, uploaded by 鐵路1, nominated by Yann
- Info Rescue workers near the semi-collapsed ten-story Uranus Building on Xuanyuan Road after the 2024 Hualien earthquake.
- Support Average quality, but can't be taken again, and a lot of wow. -- Yann (talk) 10:30, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--🚊。鐵路Railway Talk 11:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose No, definitely not with that problem of perspective, which gives the impression that all the buildings are collapsing, while in fact there is only one in the center. But believe it or not, I was working on a derivative version of this file on my computer to propose a "delist and replace" nomination on en-Wikipedia. In addition to this major problem of perspective, the sky is horribly dotted with many dust spots. The resolution is not great and I'm not sure that, even with these corrections, it can become a FP on Commons. Still, I'm going to upload another version soon, so you can compare. To finish, I'm not sure the file name, that translates into "04.03 The Vice President went to Hualien to learn about the disaster situation and rescue progress - 53629407644" really describes the image. I don't think the Vice President is a fireman :-) Best regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done: File:Rescue workers near the semi-collapsed ten-story Uranus Building on Xuanyuan Road after the 2024 Hualien earthquake.jpg -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- {{Support}} only perspective corrected version; Oppose original version. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:43, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- AirshipJungleman29, your (double) vote will be invalid for the User:FPCBot we use here for the result. There is no alternative yet, thus I've fixed your (invalid) support. -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:48, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Update: Now Yann has added the alt, AirshipJungleman29, you are free to cast your green support below. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose this version but would support Basile's version. The perspective problems in this one are the killer. If you're illustrating a collapsing building you really need to aim for realism. With no perspective correction it genuinely looks like all the buildings are damaged and leaning. Cmao20 (talk) 13:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose against, subject very interesting but "it would be possible to take a better photo" => there are some stain on the tract-sin. Olivier LPB (talk) 15:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]- Support --Yann (talk) 14:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:32, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Better focus on the central theme.--Paracel63 (talk) 17:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per above. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:05, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:34, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much for the editing, Basile! – Aristeas (talk) 19:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 21:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 02:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cool stuff Poco a poco (talk) 16:11, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 07:56:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Monarchidae (Monarch Flycatchers)
- Info created and uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Kaim Amin -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Too much empty space IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 12:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support A square crop would improve this one, but still good Cmao20 (talk) 13:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Info Kaim Amin, I have made a cropped version of this image that reduces the amount of empty space here. If you like this version and think it would improve this nomination's chances of success, I can add it as an alternative? Cmao20 (talk) 21:46, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Cmao20, Sure go ahead. I wasn't sure how to do it otherwise I'd have done it myself. — Kaim Amin (talk) 09:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support (would also support crop) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:03, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 02:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Alternative version
[edit]- Support . Pinging Kaim Amin, Poco a poco, Giles Laurent, Harlock81 to notify about alternative version. Cmao20 (talk) 13:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for pinging me. I prefer the first one, but my support is for both versions. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the ping Cmao20 but as Poco a Poco says I think the image needs lead room on the left. I would support an alternative with square crop that has more lead room to the left or an alternative with a crop with same format as the original but with less space at top and left or an alternative horizontal 4:3 format -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for pinging me. I prefer the first one, but my support is for both versions. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I'd have left a bit more of space as lead room on the left but I still prefer this one. Thank you for the alt version, Cmao20 --Poco a poco (talk) 23:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Not a fan of this crop. If anything, a slight from to the left and the top of the original, but I prefer as is. — Rhododendrites talk | 02:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Vulcan supports both version –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2025 at 14:27:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia
- Info: Peace River Valley in autumn colours; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful panorama and I love the subtle changes in the landscape across its span Cmao20 (talk) 18:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Oh my. Wolverine X-eye 20:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:54, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful panorama and also interesting due to the disposition of the clouds caused by the particular orography of the area. --Terragio67 (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I love the photo (and don't want to be pixel-peeper), but there are some stitching errors in the image (blurry areas). See notes (probably I haven't catched all of them). — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:07, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Reading the comments on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kiskatinaw River Bridge.jpg – it could be caused by some optical distortion of your lens, because there is striking difference of sharpness in the panorama. — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- You're correct, the unsharp areas are the artifacts of the lens, not the stitcher. I took care of the most problematic parts prior to nominating. I'm currently travelling with a small laptop, and, unfortunately, I won't be able to edit this immediately. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Reading the comments on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kiskatinaw River Bridge.jpg – it could be caused by some optical distortion of your lens, because there is striking difference of sharpness in the panorama. — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 22:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Until it's fixed. — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2025 at 08:11:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Spain
- Info created & uploaded by Mikipons – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 08:11, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:11, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
SupportGood composition and light Cmao20 (talk) 12:46, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Per below, I think it's bad cloning rather than the sky being replaced - can't see any issues elsewhere along the horizon that suggest the image is a composite - but yes, unfortunately noticeable, likely to be building work. Cmao20 (talk) 17:21, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 13:44, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Support Amazing light.--Rbrechko (talk) 19:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- per Charlesjsharp --Rbrechko (talk) 19:18, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:24, 4 January 2025 (UTC)SupportAppealing composition, interesting building and compelling light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 5 January 2025 (UTC)- Support --Llez (talk) 09:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Support--Mile (talk) 10:07, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Times have come, where you must check each pixel. @Charlesjsharp ping the voters. --Mile (talk) 11:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose No response to identification of editing flaws. And as requested: @Tomer T, Agnes Monkelbaan, Giles Laurent, Rbrechko, Ermell, and Llez: @SHB2000, Crisco 1492, Poco a poco, Famberhorst, Aristeas, and Paracel63: Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:52, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Will also Weak oppose per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:26, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Support— Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)SupportPoco a poco (talk) 12:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC)- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral It's a pity that the sky is oversaturated a bit, IMO. — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Weak supportBeautiful view, good light. There are traces of rather coarse masking (with double contours) at the border of the sky in the top-right corner. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Like Cmao20 above (and my own original remark), I am not sure whether the sky has been replaced or just edited in a rather coarse manner, but the artifacts at the border to the sky are certainly irritating. – Aristeas (talk) 20:22, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 18:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Temporary oppose. There is a significant amount of sky replacement. See notes. Some work was done because of cranes in 2008. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Charles. --Milseburg (talk) 10:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose For now. We need a clarification by the author Poco a poco (talk) 23:08, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2025 at 04:55:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#India
- Info C, U & N by iMahesh (talk) 04:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support For me this is a somewhat oppressive recording.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Striking perspective, good quality Cmao20 (talk) 12:45, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 13:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:41, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose whatever that thing at the back right is really distracting for an FP. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi there, I attempted to remove it using Photoshop, but when I zoom in, the modification is visible. iMahesh (talk) 10:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Interesting architecture, narrow space handled well with good perspective. Took the liberty to change the gallery link slightly because the photo shows the interior of a religious building. – Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. iMahesh (talk) 10:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)