Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/10/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 26th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scope unclear Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:39, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: wrong file, my bad. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rgury (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Com:Toys

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Web grab. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Seite war ein Experiment, um etwas auszuprobieren, da sie jetzt nicht mehr notwendig ist, bitte ich um Löschung Ermione 13 (talk) 13:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potentially confusing users, actually not a documentation, the content itself is heavily flawed. Speravir 00:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Not used anymore. --Speravir 00:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, trash, user's only contrib. --Achim (talk) 19:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source for the base map, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 12:22, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is a derivative work of File:Saudi Arabia USA Locator.svg. The sources somehow got lost but could be seen in the other language versions and are now supplied. No copyright violation and no need for a deletion request. --Furfur Diskussion 18:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Jcb (talk) 20:43, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 20:43, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Liujunhui1989 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files are uploaded for the purpose of propagandizing the original work by the author, which is not notable and out of scope.

Siyuwj (talk) 00:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:57, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistake. please delete Lionster (talk) 08:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. -- Geagea (talk) 09:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TV-Screenshot Magnus (talk) 07:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 12:44, 27 Oktober 2017 UTC: Copyright violation: TV-Screenshot --Krdbot 18:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non trival logo design, equivalent media at English Wikipedia was non-free w:File:Alfa Romeo logo.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:06, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:30, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non trival title card, Equivalaent at English Wikipedia is non-free w:File:Las Estrellas title card.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of http://tvdiario.verdesmares.com.br/programas/nas-garras-da-patrulha Leon saudanha (talk) 23:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 02:58, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the copyright information. Thank you . Gilbert.or.george. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilbert.or.george (talk • contribs) 04:51, October 29, 2017‎ (UTC)

Kept: withdrawn. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:41, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File taken from Flickr stream with text notice announcing temp hiatus. No value to Commons. Wikimandia (talk) 08:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:55, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded in copyright violation Wolf in Rabbits (talk) 06:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaded by sock, copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:02, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davide Cam 19 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

At least one of these is taken from http://www.fotoportale.it/modelle/pittrice/

Highly unlikely that the rest were taken by a new user whose only uploads are these photos

Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:04, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: File must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Stang 13:47, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own work claim doubtful Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:22, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:31, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Senthamizhcholan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

THese are promo images with exif stripped unlikely to be the "own work" that is claimed. As these are crops of larger images I can't find the right match for source files, but there's no doubt that it's a copyright infringement and PRP should apply.

SpacemanSpiff 00:34, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:37, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:37, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 01:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private pic Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 01:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 01:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 01:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 01:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 01:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 01:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 01:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private pic Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 01:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 01:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 01:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE at this tiny size Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 01:36, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image/drawing Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 01:37, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Svrnee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Own work not very likely. Scope unclear.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality edit 47.41.177.122 02:19, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No! It is very good quality. It is Tomio Okamura in koala.--94.230.146.226 18:17, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. PD-textlogo? Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:02, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 13:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:49, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:44, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ronlafondadon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

Igor Volkovsky (talk) 05:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:42, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

discolored, unusable photo kennethaw88talk 05:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:42, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

discolored, unusable photo kennethaw88talk 05:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:43, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

discolored, unusable photo kennethaw88talk 05:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:43, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Igor Volkovsky (talk) 05:57, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:43, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Igor Volkovsky (talk) 06:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:43, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hathamppm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - no educational value - this is what list pages on wikis are for

Igor Volkovsky (talk) 06:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:44, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SuranjanSaha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Igor Volkovsky (talk) 06:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:44, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Igor Volkovsky (talk) 06:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:44, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Igor Volkovsky (talk) 06:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:44, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Igor Volkovsky (talk) 06:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:44, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Igor Volkovsky (talk) 06:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value - it's not even in proper English Igor Volkovsky (talk) 06:24, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by T.Diskeuve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The photo is maybe a copyright violation (small size, no EXIFs) + the logos seems above ToO IMO

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fully superseded by vector image File:Evolution of the broadband spectral energy distribution of AT2017gfo.svg, which is taken from the original source, has better resolution and smaller file size. There is no reason to keep a JPEG version of this. Geek3 (talk) 19:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mike70BA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are low-quality nude images with no educational purpose here.

Guanaco (talk) 19:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - And thanks to OP for doing the particulars. GMGtalk 19:39, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need OTRS-permission for every used image. Taivo (talk) 19:37, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cardgioinc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused logo of questionable notability: out of scope. Maybe above ToO too

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexgonzriv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader has made clearly false "own work" claims on other images. I think these low-resolution photos were actually taken from the web.

Guanaco (talk) 19:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of newspaper photo, needs OTRS-permission from newspaper photographer. Taivo (talk) 19:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author Marc Sagliocco is needed. Taivo (talk) 19:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by İnfaz26 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos

Apocheir (talk) 20:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pure text, out of scope Apocheir (talk) 20:43, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:29, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 20:43, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:29, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crisnaspanicz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos

Apocheir (talk) 20:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adriansantosg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promotion

Apocheir (talk) 20:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:27, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: resume. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion / spam

Apocheir (talk) 21:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:25, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower-reslution duplicate of File:Church of St Paul 20130408 001.JPG Ham II (talk) 06:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: It's the other way around, File:Church of St Paul 20130408 001.JPG is the lower-resolution copy. Deleted that file. Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ru:Далгат, Дженнет Магомедовна, died 1938. No information about the photographer. Almost certainly not own work/BY-SA. Guanaco (talk) 06:43, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Comercial.miguel.leal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

Igor Volkovsky (talk) 06:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no edu value Igor Volkovsky (talk) 06:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Igor Volkovsky (talk) 06:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:57, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Igor Volkovsky (talk) 06:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:57, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Igor Volkovsky (talk) 06:49, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:57, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pekape (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Igor Volkovsky (talk) 06:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:57, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Igor Volkovsky (talk) 06:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Igor Volkovsky (talk) 07:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Igor Volkovsky (talk) 07:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:2012 IIFA Awards

[edit]

These photos were taken during the IIFA Awards ceremony 2012 held in Singapore. Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama clearly states that the CC-BY-3.0 license permission does not extend to non-Indian events. So these images aren't under CC-BY-3.0 license and are most likely copyrighted. --Skr15081997 (talk) 13:10, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These photos were taken during the IIFA Awards ceremony 2012 held in Singapore. Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama clearly states that the CC-BY-3.0 license permission does not extend to non-Indian events. So these images aren't under CC-BY-3.0 license and are most likely copyrighted.

Skr15081997 (talk) 14:42, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos were taken during the IIFA Awards ceremony 2012 held in Singapore. Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama clearly states that the CC-BY-3.0 license permission does not extend to non-Indian events. So these images aren't under CC-BY-3.0 license and are most likely copyrighted.

Skr15081997 (talk) 05:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - noe that the cat contains another 60+ images not nominated above, so it cannot be deleted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:13, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos were taken during the IIFA Awards ceremony 2012 held in Singapore. Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama clearly states that the CC-BY-3.0 license permission does not extend to non-Indian events. So these images aren't under CC-BY-3.0 license and are most likely copyrighted. The remaining (returns) files in the category were most probably taken at Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport, Mumbai, India so they are acceptable.

Skr15081997 (talk) 07:13, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manksolin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Igor Volkovsky (talk) 07:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:01, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The given licence at the source website is: CC BY-NC-SA Daniel H. Janzen 2013 NC=Non-commercial, which is not a possible licence for Commons Emha (talk) 07:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete At the source webpage and a mirror (more clear) each photograph has a different license, but the photograph at hand is not present. License was not reviewed, so we cannot keep it. I did quite an extensive search at the BOLD System site to find a different location for the photograph that possibly showed the correct license. I didn't find it. Lymantria (talk) 08:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:01, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, getty images WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 07:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clear copyright violation. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image non pertinente, inutilisée Landerster (talk) 09:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:37, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MSM2581990 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unhelpful personal photos

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I deleted speedily 2 copyright violations from Facebook. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:03, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems out of scope. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:22, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:03, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons isn't Facebook. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:02, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo of unknown child, out of project scope — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 14:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 14:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joaslin Mwinda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jos1712 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused copies of Wikipedia articles.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious flag. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a private photo, this is a picture that I'm using in the profile of Maria Isabel Dias Lago. Famous Cuban actress living in Spain.--Esp.fra.jap.por (talk) 17:19, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio - prior publications are avalaible on the web. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pablo Gállego Lardiés (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://scontent.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/s480x480/e35/15803716_1277279495663275_2851926540164268032_n.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DMcBh_PXkAM2Zci.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lwimba M Chibamba (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.yesforevs.eu/img/m183.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Logan Denney (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo and flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 14:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ogunboye Iyanu Ezekiel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader claims to be the subject AND the photographer. Unless they're selfies (they're not), that's not possible.

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - facebook images. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 14:50, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nicklauscott (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://fstcawka.com/resources/clients/uploads/others/564b5eb393a37476147399060471700.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:Q magazine logo.svg. Guanaco (talk) 19:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gabriel Rockwell (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use.

Wikicology (talk) 17:06, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:01, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie. Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use. Wikicology (talk) 17:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use. Wikicology (talk) 17:13, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use. Wikicology (talk) 17:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oceanaquamarine (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use.

Wikicology (talk) 17:31, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use. Wikicology (talk) 17:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlinked redirect Saltmarsh (talk) 17:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bestproperties (talk · contribs)

[edit]

obviously advertisements, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons,

Roland zh (talk) 17:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use. Wikicology (talk) 18:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content (see file desc), out of scope. Achim (talk) 18:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DanNkhonde (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use.

Wikicology (talk) 18:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Christopherdzowa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use.

Wikicology (talk) 18:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anees eldeghidy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos

Apocheir (talk) 20:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates.

Stefan4 (talk) 19:40, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom Dschwen (talk) 21:51, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates!

Ras67 (talk) 23:23, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:08, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! None of these buildings or its architectural elements interior are free to photograph! Without consent of the architects it is not possible to publish their works under a free licence.

Ras67 (talk) 20:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scooe Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE UKIP member (talk) 16:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image UKIP member (talk) 16:06, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private pic UKIP member (talk) 16:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: спам Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not spam (спам), but low quality tho. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:22, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, many alternatives in its categories. P 1 9 9   16:08, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: спам Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: low quality, unusable, many alternatives available. P 1 9 9   16:09, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: спам Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: low quality, unusable, many alternatives available. P 1 9 9   16:09, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, low-quality photo kennethaw88talk 03:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: reasonable quality, not blurry but misty. P 1 9 9   16:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flags by Psychotictp

[edit]

It seems to be the user's own personal flag. Sradia does not turn up any Google hits as a town, etc. Wikimandia (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:18, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry to be used. Many quality photos of the same gate already exist in Category:Bab Bou Jeloud. Wikimandia (talk) 13:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:18, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear what it is Lord Bumbury (talk) 14:24, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no educational value, out of scope. "A free Flickr image" is not a keep reason. P 1 9 9   16:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have published this incorrect image as part of our thesaurus. It should be removed. 193.190.154.22 14:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. this can be deleted --TobiasMoMu (talk) 14:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I understand why this should be removed. If the description is incorrect (i.e. this isn't a polo neck), then the description can be changed and the file renamed. With a correct description, the image would definitely fall within COM:SCOPE. Is there a surplus of drawing of polo shirts on Commons? --bjh21 (talk) 12:29, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Bjh21. P 1 9 9   16:42, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small PNG made from thumbnail of locator map of Spain (File:EspañaLoc.svg). Unused and uncategorized... not sure why it was created. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 15:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:43, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per an entomologist at the University, there are several types this could be. I was wrong to give it an ID. PLEASE REMOVE IT DesertTrip (talk) 15:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use {{Fact disputed}} instead. P 1 9 9   16:44, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChristianoMark25 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. All nominated files are historical photos related to es:Cristino Centurión, an Argentine footballer with international career (see es:Cristino_Centurión#Clubes) which ended 1993. Per eswiki user page the uploader was born 14.05.1987. The question here is to solve the conflict between "own works" and (examples)taken date identified per description + club career

In other words: Can't be "own works" in the meaning that the uploader was at this time not able to pull the trigger. Unknown is the source country (1st published) but the photos by unknown photographers were apparently taken in Belgium, Paraguay, Colombia and Argentina. Per other uploads by this user (related to es:Paulo Centurión) the photos may be coming from a family album.

Gunnex (talk) 18:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:28, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChristianoMark25 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Composite images with missing source information for individual images

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, DW. P 1 9 9   16:46, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality (out of COM:EDUSE) & there are tons of better X-rays in Category:X-rays of forearm fractures.-- Mackpie (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The quality isn't bad enough to make it unusable, and I think it's the only picture in that category showing a break in the middle of only one of the bones. Most of the others are breaks in both bones. --bjh21 (talk) 17:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Bjh21. P 1 9 9   16:48, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. Till (talk) 18:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:48, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please delete this file Skleroza (talk) 23:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:52, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nestadead (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 18:21, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nestadead (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work - Small/middle size without EXIFs, other uploads were deleted

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:37, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot "Lobby rendering " Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Tommes 21:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused redirect. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:50, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:13, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source Own work - false information or flag is not official O revolucionário aliado (talk) 02:22, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 23:15, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Acredito que o arquivo constitui uma violação dos direitos de autor porque por engano coloquei que esta imagem é um trabalho meu. VMStraka (talk) 04:32, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 23:16, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:13, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JPG makes no sense - can be done in Wiki markup or SVG or HTML. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use at NL wiki in article space (has been in use for almost a year now). --Jcb (talk) 23:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata (the only two photos with camera metadata were taken with different cameras), watermarks, and previous publications found elsewhere.

LX (talk, contribs) 08:06, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:Packagning. — Racconish ☎ 13:34, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:23, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cette image n'est pas le drapeau des francophones de Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador 76.11.4.194 13:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It is sourced as such. Fry1989 eh? 16:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak keep It's close to the actual one, but the details are off [1] and [2]. Should be modified to be closer to the actual flag --Jackqc (talk) 03:22, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Looks pretty close to this flag and per consensus. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:23, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Com:Toys.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
as author of File:Minichamps - Triumph Spitfire MkIV 1-43e.jpg, I would like to say I do not agree with that request. In my opinion, Com:Toys does not apply to such models that are faithful, reduced-scale reproductions of cars, as they are not toys and lack any creative addition or change to the original model. They are not original creations, but reproductions, hence not eligible to their own copyright but that of the original designer of the car. Thus, if pictures of the original car are allowed on Commons, pictures of reduced scale faithful reproductions of that car are allowed on Commons too. At least, this is my opinion Clin
Yours, Akela NDE (talk) 08:27, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, models are eligible for copyright (see User:Elcobbola/Models). Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Toys

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:43, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Rudolphous (talk · contribs). --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:18, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Belarus.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chocomawine (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work of packaging

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Kazakhstan. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by Hedwig in Washington. --Jianhui67 TC 17:41, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redbrok (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except self-promotional userpage in en.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file has two problems. At first, unused .pdf-files are usually considered out of project scope. At second, the file is likely copyright violation (a lot of photos with uncredited photographers). Taivo (talk) 18:57, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ZukhraGabi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are from all over the internet - definitely not own works

Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a derivative of a picture from here "Dubai, EAU. Fuente: Obvious Magazine.", COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qureshi.saqib (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The third of this user's uploads appeared on many copyrighted web pages at higher resolution. Google does not find these, but they are small, without EXIF, and I doubt that they are "own work" as claimed.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://dompisatel.ru/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/000289.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nkegles (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:49, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown copyright situation. The anthem itself may be PD, but the performance probably isn't. Jcb (talk) 16:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photos with no EXIF Metadata, possible copyvio. Wikicology (talk) 17:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hamidovich (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios. See here for example.

Wikicology (talk) 17:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RTouza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyvio (EXIF), missing permission or OoPS

Hystrix (talk) 19:13, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 20:36, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Цей файл порушує мої авторські права. Оригінал вже існує на цьому сайті - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Church_of_St._Mykolay_in_Rozdilna.JPG Hmarskiy II (talk) 22:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: description has been corrected. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and also File:Voynyliv (20).jpg, File:Greek-Catholic Church in Voynyliv.jpg No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Building after 1990, see page village. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio, not PD-old. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk - 15:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted file. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 01:39, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: probably copyvio, this photograph is found commonly in many web site. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:48, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted content. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 01:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: probably copyvio, this photograph is found commonly in many web site. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:50, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

George Tweed Blvd (Grants Pass, OR 97527) Christopher Ruppel (talk) 04:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:58, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Southwest Blessing Place (Grants Pass, OR 97527) Christopher Ruppel (talk) 04:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dahlia Way (Grants Pass, OR 97527) Christopher Ruppel (talk) 04:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:00, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Southwest Eastwood Lane (Grants Pass, OR 97527).jpg Christopher Ruppel (talk) 04:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Southwest Swopes Drive (Grants Pass, OR 97527).jpg Christopher Ruppel (talk) 04:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a photograph of a photograph, doubtful own work. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Considering other uploads of Zeeshan Nadeem Shafee, this is probably not own work, but photo of photo. Real photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio, this photograph is found commonly in many web site. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sangharsh Rao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User has uploaded other images for the same subject claiming "own work" when that was clearly not the case -- watermarked and syndicated news images. These are also unlikely to be own work but just webgrabs and should therefore be deleted per PRP.

SpacemanSpiff 08:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:23, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission at the source provided Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:43, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:44, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no reasonable rationale that the author is the owner of such work Hakken (talk) 10:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: probably copyvio, this photograph is found before uploaded on commons. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: "Copyright © 2000-2017 XINHUANET.com All Rights Reserved" (see http://www.xinhuanet.com/) 112.5.238.6 11:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Apparent copyright violation per metadata. P.S. I oppose the original uploader's view (see talk page, in Chinese) that the non-official portrait for Xi Jinping we used in various Wikimedia projects is subject to moral rights and we never seek approval from Mr. Xi, thus constitutes violation of moral rights. --Spring Roll Conan ( Talk · Contributions ) 12:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@春卷柯南: yes. in addition, we need a free-use photo because Zhao is an important politician of china.--112.5.238.6 12:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Hedwig in Washington (talk · contribs). --Y.haruo (talk) 16:56, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong PD tags for this modern logo, no permission Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:12, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The paintings is copyrighted and needs OTRS-permission from artist. Taivo (talk) 11:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:11, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright mark in lower right corner. This is a non-free use image. 204.111.108.120 13:06, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:10, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wilfrid de Glehn (1870 – 11 May 1951). Please restore in January 2022 Mutter Erde (talk) 13:22, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:08, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wilfrid de Glehn (1870 – 11 May 1951). Please restore in January 2022 Mutter Erde (talk) 13:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:07, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be an edit of a image that already exists according to a reverse image search. This exact version seems to be new however and the EXIF says it was made in Photoshop. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 13:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:05, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File tken from internet and no sign of permission. E4024 (talk) 14:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:05, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work, unused file. E4024 (talk) 14:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:04, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

extremely low quality (no COM:EDUSE), better use File:Mike Tirico 2017.JPG.-- Mackpie (talk) 17:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Didym (talk) 22:02, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol: non a 'own' work (magazine cover page, non a creative commons file); and also not a PD-Italy/PD-1996 file. Danyele (talk) 17:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:02, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"File:Sinar Mas Center.jpg" it's a photo from Shanghai (China), not UAE. Jackedi07 (discusión) 11:35 14 may 2016 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Jackedi07 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FOP in the UAE

Elisfkc (talk) 18:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:32, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jackedi07 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These drawings are silhouettes of copyrighted buildings and can not publish under a free licence without the architect's consent!

Ras67 (talk) 21:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Estas imágenes ni siquiera son representaciones exactas de los edificios, no entiendo como una imagen en negro puede tener copyright, entendería si fuera la imagen real del diseño del edificio. Y ademas esto no se aplica a fotos en las que salen diferentes edificios, ¿por que en esta si cuando ni siquiera es una representación exacta si se aplica este criterio de borrado? Jackedi07 (talk) 09:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the silhouettes are very simple --> PD-ineligible. --Jcb (talk) 17:46, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. Copyright holder is "OSEGA SOLOMON". There is no evidence that uploader is the same person as "OSEGA SOLOMON" Wikicology (talk) 17:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:25, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no proof for the date, so license may not apply.-- Mackpie (talk) 19:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The experts on www.scenicworld.com.au describe reliably: "This postcard by W. H. Green (Wally) was probably taken in the mid 1940s. The gentleman on the back right hand side is Gus Benham who was a tour bus driver who became a conductor." --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:45, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Mackpie: Is there any reason to believe that this photo had been taken after 1. January 1955? Oops. 06:53, 27. Okt. 2017‎ NearEMPTiness (Diskussion | Beiträge)
@NearEMPTiness: Is there any reason to keep a 11 KB photo in Wikipedia? IMHO it doesn't even realistically fit into COM:EDUSE. (PS: "Ping" needs a signature to work)--Mackpie (talk) 12:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Mackpie: The photo is used on de:Katoomba Scenic World, and doesn't look blurry at this size. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:57, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use and it's highly unlikely that this picture dates from 1955 or later. --Jcb (talk) 18:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded from it Wikiverity. But I am in doubt about the license. Original uploader was a Italian young boy and uploaded only this picture of United States. Moreover it seems a reproduction. Pierpao.lo (listening) 11:02, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:09, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Carlos yo as Speedy (speedydeletion) and the most recent rationale was: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons: surpasses threshold of originality Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:31, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO below TOO. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:31, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Below threshold in the U.S., but source country of this image is Chile. COM:TOO#Chile is scarce on information but I would prefer to delete it because the design does have some originality to it. It is probably not a fair assumption to think all countries operate like the U.S. in my opinion. seb26 (talk) 01:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per seb26. Ruthven (msg) 13:59, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bmoretrain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Camden Station.jpg, I am not sure that the uploader owns the copyright to these images.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete. Shame since they are nice images, but the finders keepers' argument by that uploader is not applicable in terms of copyright. Unknown photographer means unknown copyright status regardless of who has physical possession of the negatives. seb26 (talk) 01:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:59, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the source is a website, this is a modern color painting, no source / evidence provided that this qualifies for PD-Art Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 04:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per seb26. Ruthven (msg) 14:00, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy Vio, Not own work. [3] Skivsamlare (talk) 08:33, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:00, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy Vio, Not own work. [4] Skivsamlare (talk) 08:37, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:00, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requested by uploader via email (is part of a GLAM collaboration) Kippelboy (talk) 11:46, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It is in use in 3 WPs, so it cannot be deleted on request. The license was reviewed and appears to be correct. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of Shouting Men, a copyrighted collective work [5]. — Racconish ☎ 10:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of Study for Picasso's Guernica in the Style of Jackson Pollock and Study for Index: Map of the World, two copyrighted collective works [6]. — Racconish ☎ 10:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: de minimis. Ruthven (msg) 14:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Everything in this image except the white wall, the black floor, the man, and the pillar, has a copyright. The test of de minimis is if an average observer would notice if the copyrighted work(s) were removed. If that were done here, all we we have is the man, the pillar, the wall, and the floor. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The artists sent a permission that should be registered.--Philippe49730 (talk) 07:19, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. No email found at OTRS. --Green Giant (talk) 22:56, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No liberty of panorama in France (artist dead in 1962, still under copyright) Culex (talk) 12:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No liberty of panorama in France (artist dead in 1962, still under copyright) Culex (talk) 12:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No liberty of panorama in France (artist dead in 1962, still under copyright) Culex (talk) 12:22, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No liberty of panorama in France (artist dead in 1962, still under copyright) Culex (talk) 12:22, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete These are 3D works of art installed in 2002, and thus subject to copyright. Per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States, such works of art do not enjoy freedom of panorama. Further, the works of art are not deminimis to the entirey image. Hammersoft (talk) 15:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Greek keyboard mono 3.png - Saltmarsh (talk) 17:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:03, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Guise as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The author, Adolphe Cossard, died in 1952. Regular deletion request is created, because the file has been 10 years in Commons and it is used 50 times in 40 projects, but actually I support deletion. Taivo (talk) 20:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:03, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is copyrighted and should not be on wikipedia. Respubliko de Gvapolando (talk) 21:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

THIS PICTURE MUST BE REMOVED TO AVOID LEGAL ACTION. 86.17.222.42 21:30, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no source. Ruthven (msg) 14:05, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is copyrighted and should not be on wikipedia. Respubliko de Gvapolando (talk) 21:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear wikipedia, please remove this copyrighted image or further action may follow.


Deleted: no source. Ruthven (msg) 14:06, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is copyrighted and should not be on wikipedia. Respubliko de Gvapolando (talk) 21:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no source. Ruthven (msg) 14:06, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque el propietario lo subió por error y no desea que circule por la red 88.10.27.15 22:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC) Deseo borrar la fotografía, gracias[reply]


Kept: el proprietario es @Rmmingo2: ; que lo pida el. Ruthven (msg) 14:07, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder : Hervé Inizan, copy of https://share.orange.fr/#zm5N68ALLn461beaabb5/read/image/Photos Dremmwel/_MG_0532 color 300dpi.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, j'ai bien reçu la demande de précision concernant le fichier 1-Odet Inizan.jpg. C'est moi qui ai fait la déclaration d'autorisation car la photo nous a été donnée ainsi que les droits de l'utiliser par la personne qui a pris la photo : Hervé Inizan. S'il est nécessaire je peux lui demnander de refaire lui-même une demande d'autorisation. Merci de me préciser ce que je dois faire. Bien cordialement, Marin Lhopiteau (Article "Dremmwel Musique Bretonne" en cours de publication)


Kept: OTRS approved. Ruthven (msg) 14:08, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, may be undeleted if determined it falls under a free license. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:17, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of company with no apparent notability. Apparently uploaded for use in en:User:Gauravkanojiya1988, which has been deleted as spam, as noted on en:User talk:Gauravkanojiya1988. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. If deemed within scope for some reason and if it is above the threshold of originality required for copyright protection as asserted by the uploader, then verified permission is required. LX (talk, contribs) 17:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also: File:Logo booktrip.jpg, uploaded by sockpuppet Booktrip2017 for use in en:User:Booktrip2017/sandbox, which has been deleted as spam, as noted on en:User talk:Booktrip2017. LX (talk, contribs) 17:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion

Apocheir (talk) 20:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, except for File:Lipka cover 2016.png which is in use on frwiki. --Guanaco (talk) 16:18, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is copyrighted and should not be on wikipedia. Respubliko de Gvapolando (talk) 21:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Respubliko de Gvapolando: Do you have any proof for what you assert? Otherwise I'll say  Keep. --Ruthven (msg) 14:04, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 16:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request of author Emma dusepo (talk) 09:07, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:09, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is copyrighted and should not be on wikipedia. Respubliko de Gvapolando (talk) 21:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep unless a proof is provided. No results from Google Images. --Ruthven (msg) 14:05, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Ruthven. --E4024 (talk) 09:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 16:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request of author Emma dusepo (talk) 09:09, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:09, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is copyrighted and should not be on wikipedia. Respubliko de Gvapolando (talk) 21:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @Respubliko de Gvapolando: Copyrighted by whom? Where? --Ruthven (msg) 14:07, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 16:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request of author Emma dusepo (talk) 09:08, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, they are in use. Too late... --E4024 (talk) 12:00, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:09, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There was a discussion in Village pump about the photo and @Ruslik0: suggested these two licenses, which I added to the photo. Problem is that the photo was likely not first published in USA, as second license claims, but in Europe, and that case URAA applies. I do not find suitable licenses. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect needs to be deleted because the page it redirects to does not fulfull the correct purpose for the name, nor is there any other image which show that particular purpose (i.e. the result of the 2017 election showing a Labour led government in the horseshoe shape format). Once this redirect is deleted, then either I or Fanx can upload an image fulfulling that purpose to this location. Tomiĉo (talk) 09:13, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to fix every page that this redirects to, across multiple projects? And ... haven't you done enough damage already? Admins haven't shown any willingness to resolve this - best not try waking them up again. Fanx (talk) 09:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As soon as the redirect is deleted, we upload a new image. No continuity problem. And I'm sure the admins have no problem with working towards a solution. Tomiĉo (talk) 09:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've already asked two admins ... they've told me NO, or just ignored me already. This page was already fixed so that it redirected to another file with an unambiguous name, so this filename in now defunct -except as a redirect ... which it already was. So now ... it has to be recreated as a redirect - because for so many editors like you, the name it had just seemed to invite change, and that will happen again you can bet on it. Because it seem your basic wiki-editor doesn't see beyond their own nose, and isn't going to bother checking ... just like you didn't. Fanx (talk) 10:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep It's the flag of Campo Limpo Paulista, a municipality in Brazil, and thus public domain per the Brazilian government. It has the appropriate license already on the page. Wikimandia (talk) 11:49, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Please add a source to show that this version is indeed the official flag from the government. I could not find it at a government website with reverse image search. Without such a source we do not know whether the license may apply. Jcb (talk) 12:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - image has no source. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1942. Jcb (talk) 10:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, regrettably, the "source" given in the description pointed at a non-existent site and I was unable to find any additional information about the image other than its in wide use on the internet in larger versions. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLeE29pX4AAx6MW.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This is my own work. I took the photo when Gilbert and George visited the Art Gallery of New South Wales in 2010. Please refer to the other photos I took on the day. Please don't delete my photo. -- User:Gilbert.or.george

@Gilbert.or.george: Can you please upload the original full size photo with intact EXIF metadata (with a separate filename if it thumbnails differently than this photo)?   — Jeff G. ツ 22:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what a EXIF is. I took the photo 7 years ago, I can't even remember what device I took it with, or where the original file is.User:Gilbert.or.george


Kept: Per statement by uploader. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Saferworld logo was recently updated, so I tried to change it on the Saferworld page to this updated version. However I didn't realise that I uploaded it with the same filename as the old one. So when I try to insert the new file code it doesn't update because it seems to think I'm still pointing to the old one. I would like to delete and reupload the new logo with a different filename so that it will recognise them as separate and be able to update the Saferworld wikipedia page. Saferworld1989 (talk) 16:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused logo. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The "FBMD" in the exif data was a total give-away. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is not probably not "own work". Artix Kreiger (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My name is Stas Suscov and I work for Pro:Atria. My email is my first and last name at the proatria dot com domain. We are updating our page and we want to publish our logo. The logo was created by me using Inkscape. Feel free to ask me questions if you need more details. Thanks. (Feel free to remove the previous revisions though, sorry about that). Stas` (talk) 19:43, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Attached to submission declined at en:wiki essentially for lack of notability. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims considering the uploader's history (compare, for example, File:Политическая глобализация.jpg). LX (talk, contribs) 19:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too original to be free. No proof of authorization. May be moved to French WP where fair use is accepted for logos. Same problem for File:Deep Forest.png. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deep Forest.png has been reverted to original not-so-much-lookalike- version. Deep Forest logo.svg could be done using that as model.--RicHard-59 (talk) 08:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded new not-so-much-lookalike-svg. Too original-versions can be removed from histories.--RicHard-59 (talk) 08:25, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep--RicHard-59 (talk) 09:13, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: but deleted first version. --Jcb (talk) 13:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. The sculpture shown in the picture was designed by sculptor Alexander Gvozdikov (born in 1951; Russian: Александр Гвоздиков, reference). Jarash (talk) 20:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 10:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Anonymous-EU should apply here. --JuTa 20:08, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 10:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This is a tinted version of an extremely old photo, likely taken around 1900, that was made into postcards to sell to tourists, thus the name in Russian and French. This tinted version identifies the city as Petrograd (you can see they blacked out "Saint Petersburg" and stamped on "Petrograd"), which means it was made after 1914 when they changed the name of the city, which was changed again 10 years later to Leningrad. This earlier black and white version identifies it as Saint Petersburg, which means it was originally made prior to 1914.[7] The copyright would be with the original photographer/postcard maker, who were surely local to the area or associated with the cathedral. All works prior to the Russian Revolution are not copyrighted and are public domain. ru:Сроки действия авторских прав: "Все произведения, опубликованные до Великой Октябрьской социалистической революции (7 ноября 1917 года), считаются неохраняемыми и находящимися в общественном достоянии." Wikimandia (talk) 11:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: still unclear copyright situation. --JuTa 20:02, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that this is an official WH photo. The photo is currently available at http://www.whitehouseusher.com/photos-1.html which states that these are from Emery's collection. And they can't be own work since Emery was in the photo, not behind the camera Gbawden (talk) 12:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Emery may have also collected those pictures for his book, but they do not belong to him. It states on the bottom of www.whitehouseusher.com/photos-1.html that they are not his. They are under the public domain because they are Official White House Photographs. Please see the following emails in reference to the photograph. The image is very clearly taken in the White House where only Official White House Photographs are permitted. Please remove the deletion request. Thsmi002 (talk) 13:39, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Forwarded message ----------

From: Michael Pinckney <michael.pinckney@nara.gov> Date: Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:08 PM Subject: Reagan Photo

My name is Michael and I was forwarded your request.

The two photos below are part of the Official White House Photo collection and are considered to be in the public domain and can be used without getting the Reagan Library permission.

Thanks and please feel free to contact me with any questions.

Michael

Michael Pinckney Archivist Audio Visual Department Ronald Reagan Presidential Library National Archives and Records Administration 40 Presidential Drive Simi Valley, CA 93065 tel. 1-800-410-8354, ext. 74077 tel. 805-577-4077 fax 805-577-4080 michael.pinckney@nara.gov www.reaganlibrary.gov Check out our new YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/c/RonaldReaganLibrary



Forwarded message ----------

From: Mary Finch <mary.finch@nara.gov> Date: Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:02 PM Subject: Re: Photos Bush Use of Bussh Photo's. . .


Thank you for contacting the George Bush Presidential Library and Museum Audiovisual Department.

The White House photos are public domain so you do not need to get permission to use them. The credit line should be to the George Bush Presidential Library and Museum.

If you needed digital copies of the photos, the cost would be $15.00 for a 5x7, 300 dpi, $20.00 for 8x10, 400 dpi, and $25.00 for any other size or resolution.

Please contact me if you have any other questions.

Best regards, Mary


Forwarded message ----------

From: Herbert Ragan <herbert.ragan@nara.gov> Date: Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:53 PM Subject: Re: Use of Clinton WH Photo's. . . Cc: John Keller <john.keller@nara.gov>


As you were provided those prints by the White House you simply need to credit them "White House Photographs." Photographs taken by White House photographers fall into public domain, so are no further specific stipulations for publication.

- Herbert

Herbert Ragan Audio/Visual Archivist / National Archives and Records Administration Certified Society of American Archivists' Digital Archives Specialist William J. Clinton Presidential Library 1200 President Clinton Ave., Little Rock, AR 72201 Ph (direct): (501) 244-2852 / Fax: (501) 244-2850 Herbert.Ragan@nara.gov

@Thsmi002: It is for us impossible to verify these email here. Please ask Herbert Ragan to send a permission (or any other statement) to OTRS. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 15:46, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: should be confirmed through Commons:OTRS. --JuTa 20:11, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the original uploader on it.wikipedia said that it was "released into the public domain (by the author)"; later, he clarified that the original document is in his personal collection, and stated that he is the author. However, he is not the author. Pino Rucher (1924-1996), was the author. I changed the license to template:PD-Italy, because that's 20 years after creation, and the drawing was made in 1979. But if PD-Italy doesn't apply to drawings and doodles, this work will not be PD until 2066. DS (talk) 01:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Public domain I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide.
In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so:
I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.
Alessandroferri (talk) 07:09, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You are not the copyright holder of this work. Pino Rucher is the copyright holder of this work. DS (talk) 14:27, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:56, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Isn't there no COM:FOP in the U.S. for 3D art? ViperSnake151 (talk) 04:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 11:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]