Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/08/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
cobaloxime_formal_charges_removed.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![142 File:Matthew "MattG" Gonzales.jpg](#File:Matthew_"MattG"_Gonzales.jpg){kind=link}
Barack Obama TheFightersView (talk) 01:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy close -- nonsense. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 01:56, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Stefan Kießling Robertodimatteo (talk) 07:46, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No reason given SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 10:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Steve Mandanda 5423 Robertodimatteo (talk) 10:34, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: inconsistent request SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 10:53, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
cobaloxime_formal_charges_removed.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
cobaloxime_formal_charges_removed.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Mistake in the bond notation from Co to north-east N: either need simple lines for all Co–N or this one also needs to be an arrow to the Co. "Just this one" doesn't make sense to be a single bond vs the other three as datives. Have File:Structure of Chloro(pyridine)cobaloxime fixed.png as corrected one. DMacks (talk) 03:46, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
cobaloxime_fixed.png){kind=link}
cobaloxime_formal_charges_removed.png){kind=link}
Delete Clear case: The corrected version was uploaded by the same user only 2 minutes later. Hence, (s)he must have noticed his/her mistake. --Leyo 07:12, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
yep I have already uploaded a correct version, thanks for the reminder and please help me to delete it LHcheM (talk) 14:51, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
cobaloxime_formal_charges_removed.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Per nom and uploader's wish. Leyo 14:55, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
cobaloxime_formal_charges_removed.png){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 17:33, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 17:34, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Speedy deleted, blatant copyright violation, false source and false license claims. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:31, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused photo of an unidentified person. Sreejith K (talk) 16:10, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Have you notified the original uploader? He might want to extent the description page. --Leyo 16:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Keep Identified and now used. Badzil (talk) 16:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Subject identified. Image not out of scope. Sreejith K (talk) 16:28, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
El usuario ha tomado la imagen de internet, posiblemente de algún periodico que esté cubriendo la noticia sobre el caso de la restauración del Ecce Homo de Borja. Además, la descripción de la imagen es empleada para ridiculizar a la señora que intentó la restauración, denominandola "La octogenaria" en tono despectivo. jespa (talk) 09:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Pero dejate de joder solo representa la pinturas no hay ninguna burla wikipedia no le creas!
- Deleted, the image appears on several sites on Google. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:50, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Tomuglysbridge2.jpg Mike Peel (talk) 19:35, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, I see the other file is a lower resolution version of this image. So the image pages should be merged, with the higher quality version used. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:37, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
, Files were merged by User:Túrelio - many thanks! Mike Peel (talk) 16:51, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
experimenting by a new user Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 23:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:05, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Mistake... Goozpeak (talk) 04:11, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Verschiebung Alma (talk) 12:33, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: by Foroa. Yann (talk) 18:44, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image.
- File:DJ REWIND in Fayetteville, NC.jpg
- File:DJ REWIND BARCELONA FAY NC.jpg
- File:DJ REWIND DJ FAYETTEVILLE NC.jpg
- File:DJ REWIND SASHA SIMONE.jpg
- File:DJ REWIND HUMAN TORCH.jpg
- File:DJ REWIND J. COLE FAYETTEVILLE NC.jpg
- File:DJ REWIND MIKE EPPS.jpg
- File:DJ REWIND MTV PARTY DJREWIND FAYETTEVILLE nc.jpg
- File:DJ REWIND FAYETTEVILLE NC CLUB.jpg
- File:DJ REWIND NC FAYETTEVILLE.jpg
- File:DJ REWIND DJ EPIC NC.jpg
Érico Wouters msg 00:11, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:22, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 00:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:26, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Moises-RCDespanyol.jpg Jump to: navigation, search Robertodimatteo (talk) 22:30, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Moises-RCDespanyol.Jpg 87.10.183.190 06:10, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 09:42, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio Thesupermat (talk) 07:40, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
This might be used as an example for color filters in image processing programs. Sorry, but it is useless for any other purpose. Wikimedia Commons is no private photo album. Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 16:27, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --McZusatz (talk) 16:36, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
TVscreenshot, see the watermarks of Botola pro at the other uploads. Martin H. (talk) 19:50, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image.
- File:RM EL Ultimo De Los Verdaderos Machos Latinos.jpg
- File:Latinoooooo Ho Ho Ho Ho Ho Ho Ho..jpg
- File:Ecuador Te LLevo En Mi Cora Mi Tierra Bella.jpg
- File:RM RM La Leye La Leyendaaa.jpg
- File:Que Cante Mi Gente,A La Le Lo Le Lo La Latinooooo.jpg
- File:Stop Aqui La Leyenda Viviente Soy Yo, Aguante RolyMan EL Rey De Los Latinos.jpg
- File:RolyMan EL Lugarteniente.jpg
- File:En Espera De Lo Mejor De Miii Y Lo Nuevo.jpg
- File:Sienten Ya Mi Ritmoo Y Escuchan Mi Vozz Se Mueven Con EL Bajo Y EL Stringeee.jpg
- File:2010 EL General Rolyyy En EL Pamperooo.jpg
Érico Wouters msg 22:19, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:27, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:28, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:24, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
As all other images from this Flickr-washing account, very unlikely "own work". -- Túrelio (talk) 22:31, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:12, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image.
Érico Wouters msg 22:39, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:01, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:17, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:27, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 00:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 05:39, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
The background image is copyrighted. Sreejith K (talk) 01:21, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Its just 20% of a movie poster.Clearly the actor and actress are the main subjects in the image.If this is deleted due to the background image being copyrighted then all movie promotion related pictures will have to be deleted cause they all will have actors and actress standing in front of a movie poster. Boseritwik (talk) 12:56, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Comment Agree the focus is on the actors and inclusion of part of the poster is incidental; looks like it would have been near impossible to photograph the people without including a portion of the background poster. If included bit of poster is deemed to exceed de minimis, I suggest image be cropped -- probably best as two seperate photos of the 2 actors. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- I have blurred the background. Not sure whether I have blurred enough to make the poster de minimis. --Sreejith K (talk) 18:01, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: with the background blurred. Yann (talk) 05:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Advertising purpose, single upload from user, out of COM:PS. Funfood ␌ 20:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: by Denniss. Yann (talk) 05:42, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 00:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Uploaded by accident, file format problems. Deharris (talk) 00:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Uploaded by accident, file format problem. Deharris (talk) 00:29, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Uploaded by accident, file format problem. Deharris (talk) 00:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 00:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 00:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 00:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
tam buolyavakı ıseter mi baklımkibıl 178.233.108.136 00:43, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
No evidence of permission of original photographer; inadequate evidence that the file is public domain as claimed. Diannaa (talk) 02:21, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
incomplete information and substantially the same as File:113th U.S. Congress House districts blank.svg Nlvwarren (talk) 02:45, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
incomplete information and substantially the same as File:113th U.S. Congress House districts blank.svg Nlvwarren (talk) 02:45, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
A PUF. Since the subject died only in 1957, there is no proof that the photograph was published before 1952 in India. The uploader is a student as per his own en.wiki user page and is quite unlikely to be the author of the work. Lovy Singhal (talk) 03:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
The picture was taken in 1952 when the subject re-assumed his constitutional office;the original work is available in archives in vernacular form and is deemed fit to be in public domain in India as per the existing law of the land.This has been scanned from the original source and provided for reference.I would further like to say that i have already declared this fact in the source description and that it may be a bonafide case of mis-representation rather than concealment of fact.I regret if this has violated any norms here and will abide by the decision of the learned colleagues at wikimedia commons.
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copied from a magazine or book. You can see some lightly printed letters in the air. Lymantria (talk) 05:31, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per derivative. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:40, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Sreejith K (talk) 03:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Also nominating:
No reason to assume this is PD-RomaniaGov: not an official legislative text. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:27, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
No reason to assume PD-RomaniaGov, neither an official state symbol nor an official text of legislative nature Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:33, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 08:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:19, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
defective file ChemDoc 2010 (talk) 08:23, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
defective formula ChemDoc 2010 (talk) 08:24, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
defective formula ChemDoc 2010 (talk) 08:25, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Doubtfully own work, found on many websites, e.g. in better resolution here: http://33m.lista.cl/posts/deportes/11085379/U-de-Chile-Campeon-Torneo-de-Apertura-2011.html. Funfood ␌ 09:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. Probably not own work. Badzil (talk) 16:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 19:19, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Yahoo answers has copyrights. UAwiki (talk) 09:16, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture, single upload from user, out of COM:PS. Funfood ␌ 10:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Looks mildly suspicious to me: drive-by uploader, no metadata. That said, I can't find any matches online. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:52, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:John Moe.JPG, renominating to give uploader a chance to respond this time. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:26, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:14, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:23, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:14, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:23, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:23, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:21, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:21, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:19, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:19, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 14:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:26, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 14:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. As long as I understand, this image is the derivative work of image in www.anunner.com/anahit.koryun. + photograph of a modern statue in Armenia. See COM:FOP#Armenia. Takabeg (talk) 14:35, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
A better version exists: File:RedBandTrPlateFV.svg. Both are my uploads. I tried to "upload a better version of the file" but it failed since the new image was *.svg --Infestor (talk) 15:11, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Photograph of a modern statue in Armenia. See COM:FOP#Armenia. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tumanyan Yerevan house-museum statue.jpg. Takabeg (talk) 15:36, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Photograph of a modern statue in Armenia. See COM:FOP#Armenia. Takabeg (talk) 15:47, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Reinhardhauke (talk) 16:16, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
not own work, copyrighted material 178.41.152.241 16:33, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Unknown author an {{PD-old}} does not fit together for an 1906 foto. Author can easily lived past 1942. Compare de:Datei:Rauchsches Palais am Marktplatz und Kilianskirche in Heilbronn.jpg too. JuTa 16:35, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Cette photo est une copie de celle : "GM Guelma Theatre romain04.jpg" qui a été déposée en 2006 90.3.63.215 17:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
This poster has know author and it's only 27 years after his death. Author Тоидзе, Ираклий Моисеевич died in 1985 Justass (talk) 18:44, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work. Common Good (talk) 19:00, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Incorrect license. Leyo 19:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture, single upload from user, out of COM:PS. Funfood ␌ 20:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:29, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope Justass (talk) 20:38, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Is it really neccesary to have 6 of this??? Pick the good one, delete the other rest. Fry1989 eh? 20:43, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
No source for satellite image. Common Good (talk) 20:46, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope Justass (talk) 20:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope Justass (talk) 20:50, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope Justass (talk) 21:17, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope Justass (talk) 21:29, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
No usage, no links to this file. Uploading this image, which appears to be a user picture and has no encyclopedic relevancy at all, has been the only contribution of the uploader. 77.23.254.1 21:36, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Photo by RFE/RL Wizardist (talk) 21:43, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 21:54, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 21:55, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 21:55, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:00, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:32, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused, not a peer reviewed academic paper or a PhD (or similar) thesis. Out of project scope. QU TalkQu 22:00, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Simple text in a png image, single upload from user, out of COM:PS Funfood ␌ 22:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:33, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 18:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 18:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 18:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 18:23, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:06, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 18:41, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Bernard Borgeaud born in 1945. Not in public domain. No freedom of panorama in France. 90.44.111.139 22:10, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:28, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:35, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:28, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:35, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:29, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:32, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:32, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:33, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:35, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:36, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:36, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:39, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope Justass (talk) 22:37, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:40, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:39, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:44, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:47, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:41, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:47, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:41, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:47, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:42, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:47, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:42, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 22:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:42, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:43, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:43, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Low quality, no EXIF. Most likely not own work. INeverCry 23:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Low quality, no EXIF. Most likely not own work. INeverCry 23:10, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
SVG at File:Flag of Comoros (1975-1978).svg Fry1989 eh? 23:10, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:12, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:44, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:44, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:44, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:45, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:45, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:45, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:47, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:47, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:17, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:55, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
I don't think that we can trust Flickr user 8612652@N05. Three of the user's images, including this one, have been uploaded to Commons. I have just tagged the other two ones, File:Maynard dog.jpg and File:Maynard fill Caduceus.jpg, as copyright violations, and I wouldn't be surprised if this image also is a copyright violation, although I can't find it elsewhere. Most of the user's uploads have no EXIF and this image doesn't have a very high resolution. I think that 8612652@N05 should be added to User:FlickreviewR/bad-authors. Stefan4 (talk) 23:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. INeverCry 23:28, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Most likely not own work. INeverCry 23:29, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
![23:29, 24 August 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/08/24#c-INeverCry-2012-08-24T23:29:00.000Z-File:Matthew_"MattG"_Gonzales.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
![00:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/08/24#c-Fastily-2012-08-31T00:06:00.000Z-File:Matthew_"MattG"_Gonzales.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:31, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, and low quality. INeverCry 23:36, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:39, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:58, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
possible copyvio. Low quality, no EXIF. INeverCry 23:39, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:44, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:44, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. No use/educational value. INeverCry 23:50, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
It's no longer needed! :) Epurus (talk) 23:57, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Photo of a photo. There's no copyright info about the photo of the poster Cambalachero (talk) 23:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 00:00, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Possibly copyrighted image of a coat of arms. Diego Grez return fire 00:40, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Per precautionary principle; there it is no evidence of source being free-licensed. Lobo (howl?) 10:59, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Not sure if Freedom of panorama would allows this. Most of this is text, and it doesn't look very permanent. Vera (talk) 12:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Der Schwanenweiher ist ein wichtiger Teil vom Schloßpark von Schloß Karlsberg (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schloss_Karlsberg). Das Foto ist im Artikel dort auch schon länger mit eingebunden und dient auch als Quelle der dort gemachten Aussagen. Es ist also sehr sinnvoll diese Datei zu erhalten, gerade weil das Schild eventuell nicht dauerhaft ist. Aufgestellt wurde es von den örtlichen Behörden. Vielleicht sollte man es doch lieber der jeweiligen Landesausgabe (und den dortigen Bearbeitern) von Wiki überlassen ob ein Foto sinnvoll ist oder nicht.--Tara2 (talk) 13:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- this isn't about usefulness, this is about copyright - Vera (talk) 18:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Das Schild steht auf einem frei zugänglichen öffentlichen Platz und wurde von der öffentlichen Hand erstellt daher wird das Urheberrecht sicherlich nicht verletzt.--Tara2 (talk) 18:17, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: It is meant to be permanent. Yann (talk) 06:50, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 14:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete You're probably right. Badzil (talk) 15:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Photograph of a modern statue in Georgia. See COM:FOP#Georgia. Takabeg (talk) 15:45, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't know Tbilisi is in Armenia.--Yerevanci (talk) 16:43, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
own work very doubtfull as an 1918 foto. Compare de:Datei:1918 St.Mihiel Gartenfest 3.MGK IR403.JPG too. If uploader is a heir of the fotograf verification through COM:OTRS should help. JuTa 15:53, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- The same applies for File:1918.10 Vervins Reg.Stab IR 403.JPG. --JuTa 16:20, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete: There is no FoP for artistic works in Taiwan. An image of the building without the sculpture would be ok. Ww2censor (talk) 16:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: There is no sculpture in this new image now. I believe this different image can be used. --Leoboudv (talk) 23:47, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: and older version deleted Yann (talk) 06:57, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Superseded, orphaned image. Rico Shen contact... 16:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --McZusatz (talk) 16:31, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Superseded is not a reason. Yann (talk) 06:59, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Inappropriate structure of an ionic compound. Leyo 20:25, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- What exactly does that mean? I own all copyright to it, as seen on the Wikipedia Media Copyright Questions board... It was created using a program called Chemsketch which also does the 3D rendering. --Activism1234 (talk) 20:39, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- It's not about copyright, it's about correctness. --Leyo 21:01, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Inappropriate structure for an ionic compound. Leyo 20:33, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Can u eventually just upload a corrected version over this file like K+(OH)- ?--Sanandros (talk) 00:34, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think this is necessary. There are three correct crystal structures in Category:Potassium hydroxide. --Leyo 08:34, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in France, the subject is an unfree picture, morever the Brennus shield is also unfree. PierreSelim (talk) 21:16, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Low quality, no EXIF. Most likely not own work. INeverCry 23:11, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I added a comment about Thk25 representing the infantry back in 2011[1] but for the life of me I don't remember why I did that. Almost certanly had something to do with the uploader's other work or the author's uploads to Wikipedia under the same/different username indicating s/he is the secretary (seeing as there was no private or public communication between us). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:28, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:HammondPlaque.jpg&diff=57052453&oldid=55505461){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:23, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 23:29, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 23:29, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:31, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
doubtfull if uploader equals to fotografer. Should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Compare de:Datei:Arthur Duerst.jpg too. JuTa 16:27, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep See statement and this inappropriate removal. --Leyo 16:35, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep See additional the statement at his disk. --Quedel (talk) 17:13, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept, per above. Was originally uploaded to German Wikipedia where the uploader Post stated that he is Matthias Dürst (probably a relative of Arthur Dürst, a son?) and that the photo is his own work, see Leyo's link. Without further indication of a copyright issue, I see no reason to doubt this statement. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:39, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hinchada de Club Aurora.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hinchada de Club Aurora 2.jpg
no license Sealle (talk) 08:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship. Photos, taken with 7 different cameras, other user contirbution deleted as copyvio or files without permission. Besides these photos unused, uncategorized and are of questionable value to the project.
- File:2011 Πάτραs Festival.jpg
- File:2011 Πάτρα 2.jpg
- File:2011 Πάτρα 1.jpg
- File:2010-19th Patras Festival.jpg
- File:2010 Patras Festival.jpg
- File:2009 Patras Festival.jpg
- File:2008 Patras Festival.jpg
- File:2007 Patras Festival.jpg
- File:2006 Patras Festival.jpg
- File:Assimakopoulos.jpg
Art-top (talk) 08:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Images uploaded by Robertodimatteo (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Ioan Andone CFR Cluj 02.jpg
- File:Marinus Costantin.jpg
- File:Roberto Di Matteo.jpg
- File:Andres Guardado Valencia.jpg
- File:Luiz Gustavo.jpeg
- File:Eden Hazard Chelsea.jpg
- File:Stefan Kiessilng.jpg
- File:Vasile Maftei.jpg
- File:Ivica Olic Wolfsburg.jpg
- File:Franck Ribèry.jpg
- File:Ronny.jpg
No EXIF data. Different resolutions. Together with the following files the user uploaded several copyright violations (see my deletion log) on the same subject. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:51, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:16, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Not “Own work” (see e.g. here). Hence, the licence is inappropriate. Leyo 12:55, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Should be licensed as {{PD-ineligible}}. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 14:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think it is ineligible for copyright. IMO it is not below ToO. --Leyo 14:21, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep die lizenz ist Quatsch, das hat keine SH --Ralf Roleček 19:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Info See also discussion (in German): de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen/Archiv/2012/08#Gebotszeichen. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 07:39, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: This definietly does not fall under COM:TOO... FASTILY (TALK) 05:48, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
In the deletion discussion Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Tasting_a_condom.jpg there was a general request by the photographer for all images uploaded from the Flickr account "dianaoftripoli" to be removed from Commons. In the case of the Tasting a condom image there was concern about the subject of the image being connected with the photographer's personal life as the source Flickr stream explains that all photographs are a document of their personal life. Consequently we can interpret COM:IDENT applying here not just to the models but the same principle applying to the identity of the photographer, potentially without regard to specific content of the image. The relevant images are:
- File:Glass Sex Toy.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (no person is in this image)
- File:Lesbic use of nipple clamps and strap-on dildo.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (includes body and partial face image)
- File:Nipple Clamps.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (nipple close up)
- File:Fake sacrifice.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (graphic violent and nude image of identifiable person)
- File:Nipple Clamps in Use.png (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (derivative of file #2)
There is a good case against IDENT for all these images to be deleted along with interpretation using wmf:Resolution:Images of identifiable people, so even if this is a form of "license remorse" we can still have compassion for the views of the photographer and any people involved in the creation of the sexual images. In the case of file #2 and #4 the models are potentially identifiable, though there have not been complaints from the models themselves as far as I am aware. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 11:55, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete We must not host images taken in private situations without subject consent; and where subject consent has not only been emphatically withdrawn, but the Flickr account holder has bitterly complained of our violating their privacy ([2]), we should remove promptly. --JN466 12:36, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3ADeletion_requests%2FFile%3ATasting_a_condom.jpg&diff=67108318&oldid=66957446){kind=link}
- Keep Except for File:Fake sacrifice.jpg people are not recognizable so the DR is irrelevant for them. As for the "Fake sacrifice" one, I just don't know what to think but maybe we should delete it... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:20, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- The comment by the Flickr account owner explains that both her privacy and that of subjects are compromised by the link to her account. We should have consent from them, and don't. --JN466 02:18, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- That link doesn't say who could be portrayed in those files (except the "fake sacrifice" one - and maybe the "lesbic use etc" one, which can be discussed). But overall it's still hypocrit to claim privacy when the files have first been published publicly by this same person ! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:21, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- Having images on the 18+ section of Flickr is very different from having them on Wikimedia Commons. We are supposed to obtain consent before uploading images taken in a private setting to Wikimedia Commons. We didn't. The Flickr account holder is identifiable through the source link, and she tells us both that her subjects are identifiable through her account, and that there is no consent for us to have these images. --JN466 01:56, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- That link doesn't say who could be portrayed in those files (except the "fake sacrifice" one - and maybe the "lesbic use etc" one, which can be discussed). But overall it's still hypocrit to claim privacy when the files have first been published publicly by this same person ! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:21, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- The comment by the Flickr account owner explains that both her privacy and that of subjects are compromised by the link to her account. We should have consent from them, and don't. --JN466 02:18, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: To make this short and sweet. These photos are being kept based upon the reasoning of TwoWings, and going along with TwoWings, the "Fake Sacrifice" photo is being deleted, as it is clearly a COM:IDENT issue, as well as being of dubious scope. russavia (talk) 03:05, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
No se usa en ninguna página y es demasiado pornografica como para que la vean los menores de edad 189.141.142.139 15:10, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Translates as "Not used on any page and it's too pornographic to be seen by minors." - I would support deletion on Photographs of identifiable people grounds, however not being in use or being too pornographic are not reasons for the image to be out of scope. --Fæ (talk) 15:24, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Speedy kept per previous listings; proposed for deletion and kept twice before. Wikimedia Commons no está censurada. Foto mantenido por discusiones anteriores. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:01, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete on "Photographs of identifiable people grounds". Delicious carbuncle (talk) 22:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Speedy kept on the basis that this was speedy kept ONLY FIVE HOURS AGO. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Reopened by Delicious carbuncle - The deletion rationale is entirely different and Fæ noted that he would support this deletion rationale so this is not a speedy keep candidate. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 02:14, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep The people are not identifiable. Their faces are not visible - even their family would not recognise them from this photo. The source image on Flickr has been removed, so it offers no hints as to their identity either (I don't see anything on the Flickr account identifying these specific models). One could argue that the people may be identifiable from scars and tattoos, but regardless there's no reason to believe this was taken in a place where they would have an expectation of privacy - they were mostly likely participating in a professional photo shoot with the knowledge that the photos would be made widely available. Dcoetzee (talk) 06:34, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- You seem to be missing the point entirely. This image was uploaded to Commons by User:TwoWings (a cropped version was later uploaded by the prolific porn uploader User:Max Rebo Band, although the log has been altered by persons unknown to remove their name). The photographer has stated here that they do not want the images on Commons and consider the "posting of my photography and commentary are in violation of my private life and those who are in the photographs". That seems like a clear appeal to COM:IDENT. The photographer obviously did not realize that their choice of license on Flickr would allow someone to post an age-restricted Flickr image to Commons where anyone could see it, reuse it, and follow the link to their Flickr account and real life identity. It is not necessary for the faces of the models to be clearly in view for there to be identity concerns. We don't need this image. It is not in use on any project. Why would we keep this against the wishes of the creator of the image? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:56, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- I participated in that discussion. That comment was regarding that particular image, and the deletion discussion that arose out of it. I would avoid generalising it to all their images. Simply put, I think this image has an educational purpose and cannot plausibly harm the photographer or subjects in any way. However, I'd be happy to delete it if a higher-quality substitute for the depicted topics were made available. Dcoetzee (talk) 02:32, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- The comment was clearly in regard to all images (note the use of the plural "photographs" and the part that asks "REMOVE this photo from this site and all others that I have taken"). We have many images of nipple clamps and many images of strap-on dildos - are you suggesting that it is difficult for people to imagine the two together? Is this worth ignoring the wishes of the person who took the photograph? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:15, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- I participated in that discussion. That comment was regarding that particular image, and the deletion discussion that arose out of it. I would avoid generalising it to all their images. Simply put, I think this image has an educational purpose and cannot plausibly harm the photographer or subjects in any way. However, I'd be happy to delete it if a higher-quality substitute for the depicted topics were made available. Dcoetzee (talk) 02:32, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- You seem to be missing the point entirely. This image was uploaded to Commons by User:TwoWings (a cropped version was later uploaded by the prolific porn uploader User:Max Rebo Band, although the log has been altered by persons unknown to remove their name). The photographer has stated here that they do not want the images on Commons and consider the "posting of my photography and commentary are in violation of my private life and those who are in the photographs". That seems like a clear appeal to COM:IDENT. The photographer obviously did not realize that their choice of license on Flickr would allow someone to post an age-restricted Flickr image to Commons where anyone could see it, reuse it, and follow the link to their Flickr account and real life identity. It is not necessary for the faces of the models to be clearly in view for there to be identity concerns. We don't need this image. It is not in use on any project. Why would we keep this against the wishes of the creator of the image? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:56, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing new since the previous DR. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:20, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept No new argument since last DR. Yann (talk) 17:26, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, different cameras.
- File:R1212.jpg
- File:SM11.jpg
- File:Sobhan mehrdad mohammad pour2.jpg
- File:Sobhan mehrdad mohammad pour.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
I've edit them.
Deleted: All speedied as copyvios. --- Túrelio (talk) 10:26, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cristian0331 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Penikmatbelia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Miyabi666.jpg
- File:Prilly5.jpg
- File:Pemain.jpg
- File:Bessara.jpg
- File:Sahila2.jpg
- File:Prilly3.jpg
- File:Bella Graceva.jpg
- File:Salsabilla Adriani.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- see prilly5 google --Chatsam (talk) 17:19, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios. Yann (talk) 13:14, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wwwfenomenaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Bir damci urek.jpg
- File:Efs lacin.jpg
- File:Külək və Narın pərqu.JPG
- File:Agtehle.JPG
- File:Gulussan.JPG
- File:1345458197 81c7da277b21-copy-copy-copy.jpg
- File:MəmmədovTural.jpeg
- File:81c7da277b21 copy copy copy.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio uploader, false claims of own work. Martin H. (talk) 23:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dancer SMAN3 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dampf.hans (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely to be advertisement.
- File:Daelim Besbi 125 2010 Weiss.jpg
- File:Daelim Besbi 125 Detailbild Schwinge.jpg
- File:Daelim Besbi 125 2010 Schwarz mit Scheibe.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. Badzil (talk) 16:23, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thetroublewithkatierogers (talk · contribs)
[edit]I think permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Katie Rogers Rebooted.jpg
- File:Katie Rogers Original Novel.JPG
- File:Katie Rogers by Des Taylor.jpg
- File:Des Taylor's comic book creation Katie Rogers.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Albarellos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo-only images (see Arte fusion titeres); copyright violation; low resolution files; out of scope.
Trijnsteltalk 21:41, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leialel Alejandro Sesto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images only used as self promotion, out of scope
- File:Leialel Alejandro Sesto logo Alas y Smoking.png
- File:Leialel Alejandro Sesto.JPG
- File:LEIALEL ALEJANDRO SESTO.jpg
- File:Leialel Alejandro Sesto®.JPG
- File:Leialel Alejandro Sesto®.png
Justass (talk) 21:41, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyvios. Logos without permission.
- File:The Monkeys.jpg
- File:The Monkeys Logo.jpg
- File:3DM Type .jpg
- File:3DM Type CMYK.jpg
- File:Oaklogo new2010.jpg
- File:OAK.jpg
INeverCry 23:56, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
at least one source image was deleted Denniss (talk) 02:17, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Another one is about to get deleted. I am not sure if its worth to fix this picture? Nevertheless I could fix it if I have appropriate pictures. --McZusatz (talk) 10:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep
Done. --McZusatz (talk) 08:28, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment It's still necessary to remove the problematic versions from the revisions history. Lobo (howl?) 11:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- Old versions deleted but most probably another image has to go, checking the sources I stumbled about a non-confirmed free use statement for File:Namdaemun at night.jpg and had to nominate it for deletion. --Denniss (talk) 11:22, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Bad source for the other image of the two. Guess we can't keep this collage... FASTILY (TALK) 05:49, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
I'm sorry but I don't see how this has any educational value, it's just the current arms of the Republic, with the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha line's arms superimposed. No source and historically anachronistic. Fry1989 eh? 21:01, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- hmmm, what do you mean "historically anachronistic"? educational value? Granted it is not perfect (it is missing both the motto and the chain), but it is not the only image that is meant to represent those arms. I am not sure about the exact historic use of the arms, but they are currently in use by the H.M. as you can see by his website. [[3]] Also, there has long been on the wikicommons historical variations of the Royal arms of Belgium, some which have the same variation. Tinynanorobots (talk) 22:55, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- It's just the current arms of Bulgaria with the Saxe shield on top. The current design has only existed since 1990s. The version used on the royal website has more in common with File:Coat of arms of Bulgaria (1927-1946).svg than it does File:Coat of arms of Bulgaria.svg. Fry1989 eh? 23:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- hmmm, what do you mean "historically anachronistic"? educational value? Granted it is not perfect (it is missing both the motto and the chain), but it is not the only image that is meant to represent those arms. I am not sure about the exact historic use of the arms, but they are currently in use by the H.M. as you can see by his website. [[3]] Also, there has long been on the wikicommons historical variations of the Royal arms of Belgium, some which have the same variation. Tinynanorobots (talk) 22:55, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 05:48, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
