Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/08/03
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_and_Daisy(_from_Ebon_Atoll).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![149 File:"LA NUEVA GENERACIÓN".jpg](#File:"LA_NUEVA_GENERACIÓN".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope INeverCry 21:28, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: The file name suggests that the file came from facebook. Sreejith K (talk) 21:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 00:24, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete – Unused personal photo.—Bill william comptonTalk 16:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph, COM:SCOPE.Érico Wouters msg 01:22, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:51, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 00:46, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photo.—Bill william comptonTalk 16:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph, COM:SCOPE.Érico Wouters msg 01:22, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:51, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 00:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photo.—Bill william comptonTalk 16:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph, COM:SCOPE.Érico Wouters msg 01:23, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Image of questionable use on wikipedia. Articseahorse (talk) 05:43, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 00:52, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photo.—Bill william comptonTalk 16:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph, COM:SCOPE.Érico Wouters msg 01:23, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 01:05, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photo.—Bill william comptonTalk 16:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph, COM:SCOPE.Érico Wouters msg 01:24, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 01:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photo.—Bill william comptonTalk 16:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:53, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 01:19, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photo.—Bill william comptonTalk 16:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph, COM:SCOPE.Érico Wouters msg 01:25, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:53, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 01:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete – Unencyclopaedic .—Bill william comptonTalk 16:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:54, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 01:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photo.—Bill william comptonTalk 16:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:55, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
copyrighted photo of Che Guevarra and John Lennon INeverCry 01:35, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Copyright violation, multiple ghits.—Bill william comptonTalk 16:59, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:55, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 01:38, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 16:59, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:55, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 01:42, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:00, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:56, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 01:49, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:00, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:56, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 01:52, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:00, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:56, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 01:53, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:00, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph, COM:SCOPE.Érico Wouters msg 01:26, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:56, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 01:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 01:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 02:00, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 02:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:58, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
copyrighted screenshot of Christopher LLoyd INeverCry 02:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Copyright violation.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:03, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:58, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 02:09, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:03, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:58, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 02:10, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:03, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 02:14, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:59, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 02:40, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete not useful --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 07:16, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:59, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
This file is a screenshot of a game and it is considered public domain? First of all, it's unlicensed content. Notch didn't even say anyone could use it, so it immediately falls under a default copyright, thus activating the (monotonous) turn of events regarding non-free content. Longbyte1 (talk) 02:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete, {{Copyvio}}. {{PD-because}} is not an invitation to make up any nonsensical rationale. It's not "in the public domain because it is a screenshot of a game"; it's a copyright violation precisely because it is a screenshot of a proprietary game. See Commons:Screenshots. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:41, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – A clear case of copyright violation.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:05, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:00, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 02:54, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:05, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:00, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 02:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:01, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:03, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:01, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:01, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:05, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:02, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:02, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:11, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:07, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:11, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph, COM:SCOPE.Érico Wouters msg 01:29, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:03, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:12, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph, COM:SCOPE.Érico Wouters msg 01:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:03, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:13, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:03, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:17, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph, COM:SCOPE.Érico Wouters msg 01:29, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:04, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:18, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:05, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:19, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph, COM:SCOPE.Érico Wouters msg 01:30, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:05, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
_and_Daisy(_from_Ebon_Atoll).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_and_Daisy(_from_Ebon_Atoll).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:24, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
_and_Daisy(_from_Ebon_Atoll).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:05, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
_and_Daisy(_from_Ebon_Atoll).jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:06, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:06, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:27, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph, COM:SCOPE.Érico Wouters msg 01:30, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:05, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:28, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:06, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:33, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:07, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:07, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
File:2 ppl.jpg INeverCry 03:38, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:08, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:09, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:42, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:09, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
no description, not usable Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:09, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:10, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:10, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:52, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:10, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
probably copyvio from kosovo crisis net. can't find the image tho. no exif data, user talk page with (c) material. save to assume copyvio. nonetheless, unknown monument in unknown location. not usable without description Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:11, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:58, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:11, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 07:05, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:12, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 07:05, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:12, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope (imho) Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 07:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:12, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
no educational use without more information Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 07:10, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:13, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 07:13, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:13, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 07:14, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:14, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
because i don't like 88.61.32.25 08:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Keep Personal taste is no reason for deletion. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 13:49, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 18:14, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
blurry, unidentifiable Thiotrix (talk) 08:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
blurry, unidentifiable Thiotrix (talk) 08:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
blurry, unidentifiable Thiotrix (talk) 08:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:17, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Promotional images used for spamming on enwp. Jafeluv (talk) 11:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:15, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/74089637@N00/493661281 Smooth_O (talk) 12:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:15, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: by Benoit Rochon. Yann (talk) 18:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 16:16, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph, COM:SCOPE.Érico Wouters msg 01:32, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:21, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 16:17, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph, COM:SCOPE.Érico Wouters msg 01:31, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:21, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned casual snapshot that is non-educational in value. Out of scope Sarah (talk) 17:49, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope - not in use. INeverCry 23:20, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:24, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 18:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph, COM:SCOPE.Érico Wouters msg 01:33, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:24, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Google Maps. Common Good (talk) 19:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:25, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Internet screenshot. No permission. Common Good (talk) 19:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:25, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 20:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete Unused personal photograph, COM:SCOPE.Érico Wouters msg 01:21, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:27, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:27, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:14, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:27, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:58, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO in UK Bulwersator (talk) 06:12, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Below UK TOO actually. Fry1989 eh? 21:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 03:19, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 07:15, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 03:17, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 16:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 03:18, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-notable promotional material. OUt of scope. Sarah (talk) 17:50, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission. Yann (talk) 03:23, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 22:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 03:17, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Low resolution personal picture of a not notable person. Not used. Out of scope. Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 21:38, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Florent Pécassou (talk) 12:43, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted High Contrast (talk) 09:45, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Of.jpg Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photograph.—Bill william comptonTalk 17:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
The Avaz Twist Tower in Sarajevo is a recent (2006-8) building by architect Faruk Kapidžić and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, Bosnia/Herzegovina has no usable FOP exemption in its copyright law. Therefore, this image violates the copyright of the architect. Either we get a permission or all images of this tower have to go. --Túrelio (talk) 12:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Images of the final tower:
- File:Avaz Tower (1).jpg
- File:Avaz Tower.jpg
- File:Avaz twist tower 3 02 08.jpg
- File:Avaz Twist Tower, Sarajevo.jpg
- File:Sarajevo Twist Tower.jpg
- File:Top of the Avaz Twist Tower.jpg
- File:Avaz.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Images from the construction phase:
- Delete Unfortunately I must agree with the nominator. The FOP exemption in the law of Bosnia and Herzegovina is limited to non-commercial uses, which makes it insufficient for Commons. cmadler (talk) 17:22, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- I have now notified[1] the users of :bs wikipedia about the problem and asked them to try to get a permission from the architect. --Túrelio (talk) 20:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sreejith K (talk) 14:54, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
1. Copyright issue - Stamp is from 2006, 2. Reason for showing pictures and description not encyclopedic (looks more like a pillory or detective work). Arno-nl (talk) 08:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:09, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:21, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:32, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Romania. Architect Nicolae Porumbescu (1919-1999). 128.250.5.250 04:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Moldova. built 1981. 128.250.5.245 04:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Moldova. 128.250.5.245 04:50, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Moldova. built 1964. 128.250.5.246 04:51, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Moldova. 128.250.5.246 04:52, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Moldova. 128.250.5.246 04:53, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Romania. 128.250.5.245 05:10, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Romania. Architect still alive. 128.250.5.245 05:10, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FoP in Romania, architect Anca Petrescu died in 2013 A1Cafel (talk) 14:28, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, violation of architectural copyright. The children of Anca Petrescu are very litigious, having slapped the Chamber of Deputies (one of the building's owners) with image use lawsuit. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:26, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
No FOP in Romania. Architect still alive. 128.250.5.245 05:12, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Romania. Architect still alive. 128.250.5.250 05:12, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Romania. Architect still alive. 128.250.5.250 05:12, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Photo is 1987-copyright Paramount.From Fatal Attraction; photo by Richard Corman. We hope (talk) 05:32, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Bulgaria. "built between 1974 and 1979 to the design of leading Japanese architect Kisho Kurokawa (1934–2007)". 128.250.5.245 05:39, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Bulgaria. "built between 1974 and 1979 to the design of leading Japanese architect Kisho Kurokawa (1934–2007)". 128.250.5.245 05:40, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
no educational use without description possible Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:42, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
no educational use without description possible Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:42, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Bulgaria. completed 2010. 128.250.5.245 05:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
imho out of scope. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:19, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Es fehlt die Bildbeschreibung, wird nicht angezeigt. Juetis (talk) 08:21, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
This "image" is not only questionable in COM:SCOPE (used only on a userpage), but has also potential for being damaging due to the purported, anti-jewish/anti-semitic statement. Therefore an independent source for this statement is necessary, IMO. I asked the uploader for it already on July 27th, but so far no checkable link or source for the statement was provided. Of course, if the cited actress really said this, then she has to live with the consequences. --Túrelio (talk) 08:23, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Screenshot of copyrighted computer software Robot Monk (talk) 08:46, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Improperly licenced, appears to be a derivative work of an image hosted here, which may well be PD but if so should be identified as such. Mjroots (talk) 12:32, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Might be a copyright violation, as the description states that this is the cover of a guidebook. Rudolph Buch (talk) 13:56, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
SVG with technical defect; unused. Rudolph Buch (talk) 14:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
unused, unidentified, (account unsed) Chesdovi (talk) 14:17, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
too small, unused, copyvio too? Chesdovi (talk) 14:21, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 14:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
- File:Uyen02.jpg
- File:Uyen03.jpg
- File:Uyen04.jpg
- File:Uyen05.jpg
- File:TuanUt004.JPG
- File:TuanUt001.JPG
- File:TuanUt.JPG
- File:TuanUt003.JPG
unused personal image, out of scope Morning Sunshine (talk) 14:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 14:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Low quality private image - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 15:00, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused private primitive drawing. Out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 15:05, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Low of not significant organization or test self-made image. Out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 15:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 15:09, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
and File:Hussain Dawood.jpg. Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
and File:Prasad Oak.jpg. Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement photo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Low resolution collage, consist of photos with unknown status. Doubtful authorship. Art-top (talk) 15:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 16:22, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 16:28, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 16:39, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 16:40, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 16:42, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 16:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 16:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 16:46, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 16:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
This picture doesn't really show the experience of gay marriage, and it appears to be a casual snapshot. In theory, a non-educational snapshot thus out of project scope. Sarah (talk) 17:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Promotional material. Out of scope. Sarah (talk) 17:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 17:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, orphaned photograph of a non-notable web person. Sarah (talk) 17:51, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 18:05, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 18:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 18:10, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
bad license: this picture of Russian engineer Yury Ulianin (1926-2010) is made ca. 1940, I don't think the uploader is old enough to claim it as self made work. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Look like as spam. And doubtful authorship - low resolution photo without original exif. Art-top (talk) 19:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
![19:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/08/03#c-Art-top-2012-08-03T19:45:00.000Z-File:"LA_NUEVA_GENERACIÓN".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
![00:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/08/03#c-Fastily-2012-08-10T00:03:00.000Z-File:"LA_NUEVA_GENERACIÓN".jpg){kind=link}
Substituted by [2] Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:59, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mappa_ferr_Mendrisio-Stabio.png){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Highly doubtful that ownership is the user that has uploaded it : can be found easily on the net and already deleted image in the past (might be quick deletion if identical to File:Adlène Guedioura.jpg) : http://www.kooora.com/images/algeria/gdiora/gdiora7.jpg Loreleil (talk) 20:41, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
own work? scope? permission? McZusatz (talk) 20:41, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:00, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:03, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:03, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:11, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - article on en.wiki in which this file was used was deleted for lack of notability INeverCry 21:17, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Typical web resolution for such images. Own work of the uploader is possibly not true. Note that there is no valid EXIF data given. High Contrast (talk) 21:32, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
"Não é permitida a cópia e reprodução fora da Wikipédia" means a not-accepted licence restriction. ("It is not permitted to copy and reproduce outside of Wikipedia") Rudolph Buch (talk) 21:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Dublicat of File:RWB Bahnhof.svg Flor!an (talk) 21:35, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Wordmark makes this questionable. Fry1989 eh? 21:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 22:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope (non-notable gaming guild, no educational use) Rudolph Buch (talk) 22:14, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Found in this Tumblr post as part of a group of retouched images. I can't find the original un-Photoshopped source, but judging from the other uploads by this user, they don't seem to understand how copyright works. — ξxplicit 22:23, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 22:35, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 22:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 22:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 22:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 22:49, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 22:50, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 22:56, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 01:14, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photo.—Bill william comptonTalk 16:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 23:24, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 01:28, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused personal photo.—Bill william comptonTalk 16:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 23:24, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:32, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:15, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Private image collections, e.g. private party photos....Érico Wouters msg 01:21, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:16, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Private image collections, e.g. private party photos....Érico Wouters msg 01:21, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:16, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Private image collections, e.g. private party photos....Érico Wouters msg 01:21, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:21, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope.Érico Wouters msg 01:23, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:31, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:22, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope.Érico Wouters msg 01:23, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:31, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope.Érico Wouters msg 01:23, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:32, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope.Érico Wouters msg 01:23, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:32, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Romania. Architect still alive. 128.250.5.250 05:11, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Comment Are these anonymous nominations OK? Who is hidden behind this IP?--MrPanyGoff 06:18, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:42, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Bulgaria. Built 1958 architect Lyuben Podponev. 128.250.5.250 05:32, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Are these anonymous nominations OK? Who is hidden behind this IP? --MrPanyGoff 05:40, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Furthermore, I would like to ask if this hidden person attacks only particular counties and if not then what about these categories:
--MrPanyGoff 08:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, I think the templates for deletion must be removed since they are placed by unregistered user.--MrPanyGoff 08:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Well, the IP is irrelevant: it does appear there is no FOP in Bulgaria, so there is no need to remove the deletion nominations. One suggestion is to blur the portion that is likely copyright - in this case maybe blur just the architectural "stone work" to rely on the tower lattice work being purely utilitarian and so not copyrightable. As to those other categories - well, some of the images there probably need deleting too - I've started with this one with a suggestion to blur out the pyramid. -84user (talk) 21:04, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment in response to the categories you listed, I believe they all need attention. I have posted a query at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Court Philippe Chatrier as it is difficult to determine the threshold of originality and I have submitted a very few examples for deletion. -84user (talk) 00:40, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:43, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Bulgaria built 1974. 128.250.5.250 05:33, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Are these anonymous nominations OK? Who is hidden behind this IP?--MrPanyGoff 06:16, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- I'm checking the various nominations and they seem Ok. They may have been prompted by the recent post Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Validity of Freedom of Panorama for artworks on Commons but otherwise the IP geolocates to the University of Melbourne. My suggestion is to look for either a de minimis defence or blur out the copyrighted portions, if sensible. Meanwhile I have been adding {{NoUploads}} to a few categories and nominating some images for discussion and adding {{De minimis}} to others. -84user (talk) 22:05, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:42, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Bulgaria. 128.250.5.250 05:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. cmadler (talk) 12:33, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:42, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Bulgaria. built 2007. 128.250.5.250 05:46, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. cmadler (talk) 12:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:43, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Bulgaria. built 2006. 128.250.5.250 05:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. cmadler (talk) 12:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:43, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Above COM:TOO in UK Bulwersator (talk) 06:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - Too simple --Sreejith K (talk) 12:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with Sreejithk2000. Fma12 (talk) 04:17, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 06:35, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
This is my family property. I gave no permission to have it photographed, on put pn wikimedia Skwilson89 (talk) 06:32, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
I am Aesopposea who took the photograph. The Counterfeit House is listed on maps of Adams County, Ohio. It is also sometimes listed in Adams County Convention & Visitors Bureau publications. There is also a sign (although partial obscured by bushes and foliage) that the property is the Counterfeit House. If you want no one to photograph the property, you might call the Adams County Map Department or Convention and Visitors Bureau in West Union to have this information removed from publication. I vote to keep the photograph on Wikipedia.Aesopposea (talk) 21:15, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
I am in the process of getting The Counterfeit House removed from maps and publications. The house is now closed. I would not mind having a picture of the house that shows what it used to look like on here, and a note that says closed. The Counterfeit House was open for tours for more than 20 years. It upset me to see the picture posted. I grew up in and around the house. Helped give tours, etc. It upsets me that the house is no longer what it once was. The house in in very bad shape and needs to be tore down. The family maintained the house for many years, my grandparents and my mother as well as my sister and myself and our families. Through the age of the house, my mother battling cancer for over 4 years, and lack of funds, the house wasn't kept up. My mother passed away this past April. The house is now unsafe to go in. I, in no way, meant to be rude about the picture posted. I just ask that people understand the circumstances, and respect our families.
Kept: There is no permission to give, there is no privacy break in the pictures, I'm sad to here about your story but the picture is legal and can stay here. PierreSelim (talk) 08:47, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:35, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope.Érico Wouters msg 01:25, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:35, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope.Érico Wouters msg 01:25, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:35, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Revert to previous : some strange thing appears on the loaded image Trassiorf (talk) 07:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
I think that we've managed to figure out what was going wrong with the SVG. The font was not recognized on the server, so all the spacing was off. Please do not delete. Thanks! Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 01:33, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion PierreSelim (talk) 08:53, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
i have created this page on wikipedia so it is better to delete and get free more space.. Diamond oina (talk) 07:19, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: User request. Yann (talk) 06:36, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Clearly not "own work". Would be an unfree image as this is the logo for National Youth Council of Singapore. Strange Passerby (talk) 07:53, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep In fact this is not an "own work" by the uploader. But the logo is too simple to be copyrightable. Fma12 (talk) 04:20, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 06:37, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
An SVG version of this exists (File:UK traffic sign 611.1.svg) that is licensed properly under the OGL. I have a funny feeling that 'Pædia' is not the creator of the British road signs. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:35, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep There is no rule about that SVG files have to substitute PNGs. A simple licence tag changing (to PD-ineligible or similar) should be enough to close the discussion. Fma12 (talk) 04:19, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 06:37, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
A better SVG file exists of this road sign so this file is redundant Nathan A RF (talk) 21:20, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:36, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
nieuwe versie utechtsesneltram 62.131.82.189 09:46, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Just keep, this is no reason the delete a file. Maurits90 (talk) 12:08, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 06:38, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
This and likely all other uploads from the Flickr account "Viva Vivanista are highly questionable, as they come from different photographers and, despited the alleged CC-By licensing, most or all are credited to "Viva Vivanista".
On Flickr, File:Michelle Trachtenberg 3, 2011.jpg, though declared to be under CC-BY, carries the caption "© Patrick McMullan". Consequently it can be found at the website of Patrick McMullan Company (10th line, 4th column), where it is declared as "Copyright © 2012 Patrick McMullan Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved" and where prints can be acquired.
Similarly, File:Edwin M. Lee.jpg, which is sourced to the same Flickr account and declared as under CC-BY, carries in its EXIF data multiple instances of the copyright entry "© 2010 Drew Altizer". Therefore, all 18 uploads[3] on Commons sourced to Flickr account "Viva Vivanista" should be checked and, likely, deleted, as this Flickr user may not be entitled to CC-BY-licensing. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:13, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- File:Michelle Trachtenberg 3, 2011.jpg see above
- File:Michelle Trachtenberg 2, 2011.jpg, crop of File:Michelle Trachtenberg 3, 2011.jpg
- File:Edwin M. Lee.jpg see above
- File:Russell-Coutts-2011.jpg, our source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/54585499@N04/5537061283/, rights: "Tim Williamson @ TDWMedia.com"
- File:Father Gregory Boyle.jpg, our source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/54585499@N04/5532952482/, copyright: "© 2010 Drew Altizer"
- File:Anna Bergman (5428862682).jpg, our source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/54585499@N04/5428862682/, photo by: "Rob Rich © 2011 robwayne1@aol.com"
- File:Jimmy Fallon.jpg, our source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/54585499@N04/5490046604/, EXIF:] "Rob Rich © 2011 robwayne1@aol.com"
- File:Tim Curry and Marcia Hurwitz in 2010.jpg, our source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/54585499@N04/5490044078/, EXIF: "Rob Rich © 2011 robwayne1@aol.com "
- File:Christine Taylor.jpg, our source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/54585499@N04/5489448685/, EXIF: "Rob Rich © 2011 robwayne1@aol.com"
- File:Alec Baldwin 2, 2010.jpg, our source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/54585499@N04/5490044854/, EXIF: "Rob Rich © 2011 robwayne1@aol.com"
- File:LuPone and Burke.jpg, our source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/54585499@N04/5445871245/, EXIF: "Rob Rich © 2011 robwayne1@aol.com"
- File:Masanori Mark Christianson.jpg, our source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/54585499@N04/5661900907/in/photostream, copyright: "Tim Williamson @ TDWMedia.com"
- File:Mia Wasikowska and Ryan Hastings at Balenciaga and Spain Opening Gala (2011).jpg, our source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/54585499@N04/5577126721/, copyright: "© 2010 Drew Altizer"
- File:Linda Gray 2.jpg, our source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/54585499@N04/5449046756/, EXIF: "Rob Rich © 2011 robwayne1@aol.com"
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:Amy Ryan (2010) 2.jpg,
- File:Amy Ryan (2010).jpg,
- File:Tim Curry in MOMI 2010.jpg,
- File:Archbishop George Niederauer, Father Gregory Boyle, Jeff Bialik.jpg, our source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/54585499@N04/5532370415/, copyright: "© 2010 Drew Altizer"
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- I suggest someone with a Flickr account should ask them about the validity of their license and forward it to OTRS. Unless we get a sufficient answer images should be deleted and account added as untrusted Flickr user. --Denniss (talk) 18:28, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Obvious corporate logo. Peacock graphic at top rises above threshold of originality. Description gives no accurate info on source or author. Upload has apparent history of copyvio. Google Translate translates description "הסמליל של חוגלה קימברלי" as "Kimberly partridge's logo." Dcoetzee (talk) 14:27, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete The logo is complex enough to be eligible for copyright. Fma12 (talk) 04:22, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:44, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Possibly a copyright violation in regard to the main photograph. Out of project scope as well. Rudolph Buch (talk) 14:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete No educational value, not in use. Out of scope. INeverCry 18:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:43, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete, {{Copyvio}}: non-free Internet image.[4] —LX (talk, contribs) 17:54, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:45, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 01:27, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:49, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 16:19, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 01:28, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:49, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 16:20, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph, COM:SCOPE.Érico Wouters msg 01:32, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:49, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 16:20, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 01:30, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:50, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, non-notable promotional material. Sarah (talk) 17:49, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. INeverCry 23:19, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:54, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 17:52, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 01:30, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:55, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 18:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 01:31, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:55, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:00, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete as duplikate from File:DibujoZFVN X.PNG --AtelierMonpli (talk) 21:14, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:59, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete duplicate from File:Dibujo8647341.PNG --AtelierMonpli (talk) 13:30, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:59, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete as duplicate from File:Dibujoczxbxvgb.PNG --AtelierMonpli (talk) 21:06, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:59, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete unidentified person, low quality --AtelierMonpli (talk) 21:19, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:09, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 01:31, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:13, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 01:33, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Dublicat of: File:Ikona ulica rondo z ulicą z prawej.svg Flor!an (talk) 21:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not true SVG format. Fry1989 eh? 21:35, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
File is replaced with a true svg --Nik15 (talk) 17:33, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Ok, keep it now. Fry1989 eh? 18:56, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:01, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
out of scope INeverCry 21:59, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 01:34, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:01, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 22:14, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 01:34, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:02, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 22:15, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 01:34, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:02, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 22:16, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 01:34, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:02, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope INeverCry 22:18, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 01:34, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:02, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Previously nominated by Coentor with the following reason: "Unaccurate information: merges dialects of the Spanish with the other languages of Spain, includint Basque, which isn't even a latin language." :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 08:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Strongly disagree - This map DOES NOT represent the "dialects of the Spanish with the other languages of Spain, includint Basque, which isn't even a latin language", it is just a map of the dialectal variation of Spanish (Castilian, in the broad sense) in the territory of Spain. Do not be confused by the fact that some of the dialects are called by the name (in Spanish) of other languages, like "vasco" or "catalán". The note on the left-down corner states that in the map are not represented the other languages of Spain besides Spanish, and that the only thing represented are the dialects and accents of Spanish. The Ogre (talk) 11:37, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- "Gallego", "Catalán", "Balear", "Vasco" or "Asturiano y Leonés" aren't the names of any dialectal variation of the Spanish/Castilian, but indeed are the common names used for describing the other languages (and some dialects in those languages) in Spain. This map is unsourced. It's doesn't exist any "dialect of the Spanish" called "Valenciano" and which occupies exactly the area were Catalan/Valencian is spoken in Valencia. In those areas, the population who doesn't speaks Valencians, speaks "standard Spanish", not a "dialect of Spanish called Valenciano". Besides, Castellano is considered the whole "Spanish of Spain" and in this map only occupies a tiny part of Spain. The author could have tried to represent the variations of Spanish in Spain, but has created an inaccurate map in which some dialects have been invented, and where some of those dialects have the name usually used for representing the other languages in Spain. --Coentor (talk) 19:07, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- And I would even say more: Which sources are used for dividing the Spanish in Spain into "northern" and "southern", and which criteria is used? Why The "Basque dialect of Spanish" and "Catalan dialect of Spanish" share category, when having different substrata, and "Manchego" and "Castillian dialect of Castillian language" are in different categories, while their origin is the same? --Coentor (talk) 19:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oh! I'm not disputing that the map may depicts incorrectly the dialectal varieties of Spanish. I was just saying that other languages are not represented here, and that this map tries to depict those dialectal varieties. As to the accuracy of the representation (which does not seem to me to be so wrong as you say - see File:Castillian dialects in spain.png) I would prefer more editors to comment, namely ones who know more about it than I. What about the author of the map? The Ogre (talk) 11:25, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Well, seems like We could have some kind of consensus, let's talk: The separation between northern and southern varieties of Castillian could be right, but in traditional dialects. In this map seems that the author presumed that this classification could be extended to the Castillian spoken in bilingual territories, so He added for example "Catalan-Castillan" to "Northern Castillian". What's the problem? the inclusion of "Catalan Castillan" in "Northern" and the name of a "Catalan variety of Castillan/Spanish" is unsourced, and probably, original research. The map you have linked represents properly the differences between dialects in Spanish, but this one We discuss does not, because uses the name of the other languages in Spain for describing "the varieties of Spanish spoken in those areas" (unsourced and possible original research) and expands the classification of Northern and Southern Castillan in a suspicious way. This map should be deleted (gives wrong, original research information) if doesn't changes those problems. --Coentor (talk) 18:42, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oh! I'm not disputing that the map may depicts incorrectly the dialectal varieties of Spanish. I was just saying that other languages are not represented here, and that this map tries to depict those dialectal varieties. As to the accuracy of the representation (which does not seem to me to be so wrong as you say - see File:Castillian dialects in spain.png) I would prefer more editors to comment, namely ones who know more about it than I. What about the author of the map? The Ogre (talk) 11:25, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- And I would even say more: Which sources are used for dividing the Spanish in Spain into "northern" and "southern", and which criteria is used? Why The "Basque dialect of Spanish" and "Catalan dialect of Spanish" share category, when having different substrata, and "Manchego" and "Castillian dialect of Castillian language" are in different categories, while their origin is the same? --Coentor (talk) 19:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
My friend, can I propose that you fix the errors in tha map, thus coming up with a correct map of the dialectal varieties of Spanish (Castilian) in Iberia? The Ogre (talk) 10:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- And what is the situation of Castilian varieties in Bilingual national regions, such as Catalonia and Galicia (etc.)? Is there no specifity to the Castilian spoken there? I remember that in Asturias (granted, Astur-Leonese languages do not posses the present strengh of Catalan or Basque...) most people spoke Castilian. Does it not have any specificity? The Ogre (talk) 10:26, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- I would gladly do that if I knew how, I'll consult to other people who maybe is able to modify images. About the situation in bilingual territories... well, there are native Spanish speakers, who talk in their "original" dialect (most in Valladolid-Toledo Castillan, considered "standard") and also is the Spanish spoken by the speakers of the other languages, who (at least in Valencia and Catalonia) most speak in "standard Spanish", and some speak Spanish with the accent (and some characteristics) of their original languages. Notice that in es.wiki, the article about the "Catalan Spanish" is named "Variety of Spanish in Catalan-Speaking territories" while in ca.wiki, the article is name "Characteristics of the Spanish spoken by Catalanophones". As long as "those varieties" have no name, such titles are used in those articles, and similar for the basque, asturleonese or galician case. --Coentor (talk) 19:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Kept: - in use, at Wikimedia Commons we don't judge if it's accurate or not. If it's in use in Wikipedia, it's automatically in scope - Jcb (talk) 15:31, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- You are presuming that people is using this map with a complete knowledge of the issue when that's not necessarily true. --Coentor (talk) 19:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- I don't presume that. It's just not our task to judge the quality of the maps. Jcb (talk) 21:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Esto es una total manipulación de la realidad. El título correcto debería ser acentos del castellano en España. Aospina (talk) 11:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep and speedy close. No new arguments offered, and the file is still in use. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:50, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Mapa erróneo
Este mapa no representa la realidad de los acentos en el español o castellano hablado en el sector sudeste de la península Ibérica. La frontera lingüística entre el español (murciano) y el catalán (valenciano) en la provincia de Alicante es tajante y traza líneas rectas que separan zonas abismalmente diferentes en todos los aspectos de la lengua.
Algunos errores:
1) En la provincia de Albacete no existe ninguna localidad o paraje cuyos hablantes presenten acento valenciano, sin embargo en el mapa existen motas azules (que representan acento valenciano) en territorio enmarcado en la Provincia de Albacete.
2) En la Región de Murcia tan solo en una pequeña franja fronteriza con El Pinoso (Alicante) tiene acento valenciano (hablantes de El Carche)sin embargo este mapa tiene motas de acento valenciano en una gran parte del sector oriental de la Región de Murcia, e incluso casi en el centro de la misma. --84.121.39.5 12:25, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Este mapa (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Castillian_dialects_in_spain.png) refleja fielmente dónde queda la frontera entre español y catalán en la Provincia de Alicante. De una frontera a otra el acento cambia radicalmente y sin graduaciones. De Yecla, Jumilla, Orihuela o Villena, que hablan español (variedad dialecto murciano) se pasa al pueblo de al lado (Pinoso, Guardamar del Segura) que habla en catalán (variedad valenciano alicantino.
--84.121.39.5 12:41, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, again: thanks for playing, but this is not going to get deleted as long as it's in use on fifteen pages on two different projects. If you don't like it, upload an alternative and try to gain consensus to use that instead. Cheers, —LX (talk, contribs) 12:58, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept In use. Yann (talk) 06:39, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Contemporary architecture. No FOP in Italy --User:G.dallorto (talk) 22:33, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Just a plain highrise office building. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:50, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep By the logic of this deletion request, most contents of Category:Architecture of Italy would be copyvios, which clearly isn't the case. --Latebird (talk) 14:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Kept. No architect or copyright holder mentioned by anyone. Yann (talk) 17:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 14:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted --Denniss (talk) 14:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship. Photos in low resolution without exif or taken with 2 different cameras.
Art-top (talk) 04:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:40, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MaximMilan94 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 07:03, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by S-H-O-T HD (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 07:12, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:13, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Edwin Rendon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Complejo Financiero-TdeA.jpg
- File:Tecnológico de Antioquia-TdeA.jpg
- File:Tecnológico de Antioquia.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samuelchowhk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution professional promo photos - doubtful authorship.
- File:Rainky CD Page IMG-20120804-WA0001.jpg
- File:IMG-20120804-WA0000.jpg
- File:Det SAM2418.JPG
- File:Rainky Wai (2)- IMG 0805.JPG
-_IMG_0805.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Art-top (talk) 17:32, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ricardogomezize (talk · contribs)
[edit]Doubtful authorship - low resolution photos without original exif.
Art-top (talk) 19:19, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Low resolution professional photos without original exif (excluding one). Doubtful authorship.
- File:"Alpine Energy Stadium.jpg".jpg
- File:"South Canterbury v Russia, Alpine Energy Stadium.jpg".jpg
- File:'Alpine Energy Stadium, Timaru, New Zealand.jpg".jpg
- File:2011 South Canterbury v Russia.jpg
Art-top (talk) 19:42, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Low resolution photos without original exif. Doubtful authorship.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Art-top (talk) 19:49, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
SIRPA Terre
[edit]
Sylvain Petremand is a member of the French Army (see EXIF data) and therefore the licenses of these files is wrong. --Badzil (talk) 20:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Keep As it is written in the EXIF data, Petremand Sylvain seems to be some DoD employee. Let me cite: DoD photo by Petremand Sylvain. The lower part that the nominator is citing seems to be incorrect. --High Contrast (talk) 20:51, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- The EXIF data says: "Copyright holder: Sylvain PETREMAND/SIRPA Terre Image". The SIRPA is the media branch of the French Army. Badzil (talk) 20:53, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- The EXIF data says: "DoD photo by Petremand Sylvain". The DoD is the "United States Department of Defense". --High Contrast (talk) 20:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete With such a French-sounding name, it should be pretty clear that the photographer is not American and therefore not a member of the US Army. But OK, it is valid to ask for more proof, so here is one: on page 20 of Journal Servir ([5]), the article discuss the visit of French soldiers in Canada. The two pictures bear the copyright: "Photo: adjuc Sylvain Petremand". FYI, "adjuc" is a common way to abbreviate "adjudant-chef", a rank in the French Army. So, the licenses on these files are wrong and the fact that the DoD publishes them with a wrong license does not allow Commons to keep them. Badzil (talk) 21:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- keep as long as there is no valid evidence for the nominator's speculation. This is a classical one person's word against another's - the DoD versus the "Sevir"-journal. Who says that the Sevir magazine cites this person's relation to the US DoD correctly? There is only one valid evidence: An Email to http://www.defenseimagery/ and ask the US DoD publishers for clarifications. They should know best why they state sources as they did.
And by the way: a french sounding name in the US military is a very poor argument - you will find lots of Spanish, Russian, Polish, German etc. sounding names in the US military. Reagrds, High Contrast (talk) 21:15, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- This official NATO page says "Photo by French Army Master Sgt. Sylvain Petremand, Task Force La Fayette". Badzil (talk) 21:17, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Finally a valid evidence has been found. I think we should delete it due to authorship/employee problems. It seems that the author of the two files above is/was no governmental employee. --High Contrast (talk) 21:29, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Comment The pic is probably not a DoD pic cause the VRIN has as letter a O inside which indicates it as Other (see here) and not a D for DoD. But that is unfortunate still not an evidence that he is a French soldier, he could be also someone from FBI or DEA. If there would be written Sergant then I would have said he is French but like this there are sill questions which are not answered. Just searched a little bit longer... the date is pretty close with this one of the ISAF and it's the same region.--Sanandros (talk) 03:45, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:58, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Javi blues (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like promo and fan photos.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Historical photos of some kind. May be in public domain but relevant info must be provided.
- File:ABALLAY Roberto Mouloudia Club Algérois 1955-1956.jpg
- File:ABBES abdelkader cycliste.jpg
- File:Cherchalli et abbés velo sport musulman.jpg
- File:Abbes Abdelkader.jpg
- File:ALI AMMAR dit Ali La Pointe.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Copyrighted files (life + 50 for public domain in Algeria), and false license (like here). Pilkarz (talk) 20:54, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:46, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Olivier.bergerot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vitor.vieir4 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Doubtful authorship - low resolution for own work, no original exif.
Art-top (talk) 15:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vitor.vieir4 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution professional photos without original exif. Doubtful authorship.
- File:Reserva Florestal Manancial de Cañaverales.png
- File:Parque Nacional dos Lençóis Maranhenses.png
- File:Superporto do Açu.png
- File:Projeto greenfield de mineração.png
- File:FPSO OSX-1.png
- File:Unidade Serra Azul da MMX.png
Art-top (talk) 08:35, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted.
Modern art of some kind. I think painter identity confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Bourgely - 2011-La cravatte aveugle.jpg
- File:Bourgely - 2011-LaPlumeForceLeVent 240X120.jpg
- File:Bourgely - 2011-LeVolSembleSiPresDeLaDestination.jpg
- File:Bourgely - Ceci n'est pas une chaise.jpg
- File:Bourgely - Le chemin n'est pas mien.jpg
- File:Bourgely - Où es-tu M. Henri.jpg
- File:Bourgely - Noire est la pomme.jpg
- File:Bourgely - M. Newton.jpg
- File:Bourgely - En phase.jpg
- File:Bourgely - Being there, 2012.jpg
- File:Bourgely - Anonyme.jpg
- File:Bourgely - 2011-AuLoinMaMereDanseCommeUnePoussiere.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused files, self-created artworks
- File:Bourgely - Being there 2011.jpg
- File:Bourgely - Anonyme - 2011.jpg
- File:En phase - 2011.jpg
- File:Où est-tu M. Henri - 2012.jpg
- File:Le festin d'un amorphe - 2011.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 14:58, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:36, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images/artworks of non-notable artist
- File:MaPeauLitDeRivière. - Assemblage - 2016.jpg
- File:What is art when imagination migrates.jpg
- File:Creating somewhere to sit 2016.jpg
- File:Bourgely-X016-2016.jpg
- File:Bourgely-X017-2016.jpg
- File:Bourgely-X015-2016.jpg
- File:Bourgely-X014-2016.jpg
- File:Bourgely-X012-2016.jpg
- File:Bourgely-X013-2016.jpg
- File:Bourgely 2015.jpg
- File:Mum and dad ? Maman et papa ? 2016.jpg
- File:Some times, we believe that there is Somewhere. Quelque fois, nous croyons qu'il y a un Quelque part - 2016.jpg
- File:And why the numbers have no names ? Et pourquoi les nombres n'ont pas de noms? 2016.jpg
- File:Stairway to somewhere. Echelle vers quelque part - 2016.jpg
- File:Stairway to nowhere. Echelle vers nulle part - 2016.jpg
- File:Mais qui a écrit lHistoire. This? 2016.jpg
- File:Mais qui a écrit lHistoire. ...? 2016.jpg
- File:Mais qui a écrit lHistoire. Them? 2016.jpg
- File:And why the 5 comes before the 6? Et pourquoi le 5 précède le 6 ? 2016.jpg
- File:And why the 6 is not 5? Et pourquoi le 6 n'est pas 5 ? 2016.jpg
- File:AssisSurUneEtagereLeMondeTourne.jpg
- File:Where they go, Jacques - Où allaient-ils, Jacques.jpg
- File:Bourgély - For a long time, yesterday - Pour longtemps, hier.jpg
- File:Walls and glaces 002.jpg
- File:Walls and glaces 001.jpg
- File:Bourgely LaPleureuse.jpg
lNeverCry 00:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:54, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Kuští.jpg
- File:Šiva.jpg
- File:Angampora.jpg
- File:Kaloň dlouhonosý.jpg
- File:Giorgi Markov.jpg
- File:Horní Lipka.jpg
- File:Pitárné.jpg
- File:Bothati.jpg
- File:Malyutham.jpg
- File:Tang-ta.jpg
- File:Kuttu varisai.jpg
- File:Aki kiti.jpg
- File:Silambam.jpg
- File:Guru Hargobind.jpg
- File:Kalarippajattu.jpg
- File:Mukhna.gif
- File:Images.jpg.jpeg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 04:26, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted as per nom. Yann (talk) 06:46, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yakitoriboy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Denmarkmaine (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos of some kind. May be in public domain but relevant info must be provided.
- File:Denmark Fire Station 3 Circa 1940s.jpg
- File:Denmark Fire Station 2 Circa 1940s.jpg
- File:Denmark Fire Station Circa 1940s.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ronaldblack100 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Post WWII bare-lief.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Historical photos, unlikely to be own works, dubious licensing.
Sealle (talk) 07:37, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:03, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Striker6313 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Game (?) screenshots - doubtful authorship. Not significant logo - out of project scope.
- File:Minecraft Chinese Temple.png
- File:NeoCraft Logo Pixel Art.png
- File:NeoCraft Spawn.png
- File:NeoCraft Title Art.png
- File:Minecraft Banner.png
- File:Powder Toy Glitch 1.png
- File:Powder Toy Glitch 2.png
- File:Two Swords Fighting.gif
Art-top (talk) 17:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Low resolution photos without original exif. doubtful authorship.
Art-top (talk) 17:23, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Unknown model, so out of project scope ALE! ¿…? 17:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Image is in use in uploader's user space. INeverCry 23:14, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- I am a bit worried about published pictures of minors. She seems to me an active editor, so that's might be acceptable, but... Yann (talk) 06:53, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No consensus to delete FASTILY (TALK) 09:05, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Unknown model. So out of project scope. ALE! ¿…? 17:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Image is in use in uploader's user space. INeverCry 23:13, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- I am a bit worried about published pictures of minors. She seems to me an active editor, so that's might be acceptable, but... Yann (talk) 06:52, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: keep? FASTILY (TALK) 03:33, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Coolcolney (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Lammual Stadium.jpg
- File:Dampa Tiger Reserve Forest.jpg
- File:Hmuifang Mountain Side.jpg
- File:Mizoram Assembly House.jpg
- File:Pachhunga University Science Building.JPG
- File:PUC Entrance.JPG
- File:Mizoram university Building.JPG
- File:Lengpui Airport Building.JPG
- File:Tuirial dam 2 diversion tunnels.jpg
- File:Mizo National Front Office.JPG
- File:Lunglei View.jpg
- File:Mizoram University Entrance.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Uploads are all my photos,I am a Wikipedia user from Mizoram, all photos I have uploaded can be viewed from my blog- www.miyzone.blogspot.com, all photos that I have uploaded are donated to wikimedia community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolcolney (talk • contribs)
- Could you please re-upload images in full resolution with EXIF to confirm your authorship? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- I have edited some of the photos to fit the page, I am not sure what EXIF that you are talking about, can you be more specific? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 111.93.97.178 (talk)
- Could you please re-upload images in full resolution with EXIF to confirm your authorship? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm. Of the ones I could find on the internet, all seem to come from http://miyzone.blogspot.com , done by a Tluanga Colney, which seems likely to be the same person as the uploader. There are a couple different Coolpix models involved for the images which do have EXIF, though the second model is for a photo three years after the ones with the earlier model, which also seems pretty consistent. I'd have to guess these are indeed by the same person and not just collected from the internet. For images which already do exist out there though, we do usually prefer to have some external indication that the uploader is the copyright holder -- accounts here are anonymous, so it's hard to tell the difference between a legitimate owner and someone who creates an account just to take someone else's images, falsely claim ownership, and upload them. The usage terms at miyzone.blogspot.com indicate non-commercial use. The usual procedure is to send a private email per the instructions at COM:OTRS, ideally with an email address which could be tied to miyzone.blogspot.com. The email could give explicit permission for specific images, or it could just generally confirm your Coolcolney account here is the same person, and any actions done by that account in regard to miyzone.blogspot.com images are legitimate. Alternatively, you could post a comment on an article there, confirming the license for the images taken from there, or also confirming the Wikipedia account name. Just adding a comment to one of the images that it is indeed licensed CC-BY-SA on the blog may be enough confirmation. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:59, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 06:10, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
I have explained to EugeneZelenko and I think its very arrogant on the part of Fastily to just delete the photos that have been uploaded by me. The usage terms in my blog miyzone.blogspot.com have been changed as suggested by Carl Lindberg. I have put "Please note: photos uploaded in http://commons.wikimedia.org by coolcolney are from the same account as myself tluanga colney. " in my blog link - http://miyzone.blogspot.in/p/terms-of-use.html I request Fastily to please undo the delete. Also please note that I am a major contributor for the small state of Mizoram and it's of great use to people of my state. I you have any objections to my photos, let me know and I will reupload it.---Coolcolney (talk) 13:36, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- The note on the usage terms should be plenty. I posted a note at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Files uploaded by Coolcolney. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:57, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- They have been undeleted. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:08, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Undeleted Yann (talk) 06:14, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shashankduhan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Looks not used.
- File:Asli Desi face.png
- File:We are Together 2.jpg
- File:Chandu Richsaws.jpg
- File:Curl Designs.jpg
- File:Shashnk Duhan Circular logo.gif
- File:Captain H.jpg
- File:Bifu 1.jpg
- File:Bomberman Graphic.jpg
- File:Shahsnak Duhan 7.jpg
- File:Shashank Duhan 6.jpg
- File:BEAN NOSE i.jpg
- File:We are Together.jpg
- File:A1-Thought Process.jpg
- File:Shashank Duhan 5.jpg
- File:Shashank Duhan 4.jpg
- File:Shashank Duhan 3.jpg
- File:Shashank Duhan 2.jpg
- File:Shashank Duhan 1.jpg
- File:Milky-softy.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 01:41, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shashankduhan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Primitive test images, created in 3D graphical editor. Not used, not educational, not artistic. Out of project scope.
- File:Big Roboman.jpg
- File:3D Characer 2.jpg
- File:3D Character 1.png
- File:Background 1.jpg
- File:1947 UFO.jpg
- File:3D(HailHumanity) HD.png
- File:3d firanid (Comicart).jpg
- File:3d comicart 1.jpg
- File:HH 2.jpg
- File:HH 1.jpg
- File:Fall off Tunnel 2.png
- File:Fall off tunnel.png
_HD.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Art-top (talk) 15:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Andy why they are deleted but the discussion isn't closed?--Sanandros (talk) 23:35, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Files were deleted. INeverCry 00:27, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PiedgauchedeZidane (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution images without original exif. Doubtful authorship.
- File:Immeubles de Vesoul.jpg
- File:Sécurité sociale de Vesoul.jpg
- File:Majestic de Vesoul.jpg
- File:Institut universitaire de technologie de Vesoul.jpg
- File:Grand Grésil.jpg
- File:Montmarin.jpg
Art-top (talk) 17:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- I've talked with him (on French-speaking Wikipedia). According to him, the pictures were made by him [but with a cell phone :-(] except this one which has to be deleted. Remi Mathis (talk) 16:30, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 06:11, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Request temporary undeletion -- I am concerned by a pattern shown by the individual who speedy deleted this image. Rather than weighing in, with an opinion, in open discussions, they place questionable {{No license since}} or {{No permission since}} tags on images, then wait seven days, and speedy deleted the images. I suspect the revision history here will show this individual applied the speedy tag himself or herself. Geo Swan (talk) 20:59, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- The image was originally tagged by User:Maciamo2. Nevertheless I find User:Denniss's closure with no explanation highly disturbing in light of the many subtle issues surrounding this file, and have already complained to them to no avail. Dcoetzee (talk) 07:00, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Nominating on behalf of User:Maciamo2, who claims to be the original author of the image at [6] and requests deletion as copyvio. The Eupedia work appears to be based on an earlier CC-BY-SA upload File:Distribution_Haplogroup_R1b_Y-DNA.svg by User:Phirosiberia. The essential question is whether the new map's additions and changes in and of themselves reach the threshold of originality. I think they probably do but would like additional opinions.
Some notes: Because it's based on a CC-BY-SA work, the Eupedia map either must be released under CC-BY-SA, or is itself a copyright violation. Because the source website contains no license statement (or even attribution), I believe that it is a copyvio - however that has no bearing on the question of whether this upload is a copyvio since we cannot compel the Eupedia author to release it under CC-BY-SA. The original author of the work (User:Phirosiberia or User:Cadenas2008) may issue a legal demand that Maciamo2 license the work under CC-BY-SA or else remove it, which could resolve this, but that has not yet occurred. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:WP on Getty images with watermark.jpg for a similar case. I've left notices with both. Dcoetzee (talk) 15:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- (ec) Firstly, I think that all these maps are eligible for copyright. Secondly, if indeed the Eupedia work is derived from an earlier CC-BY-SA map (this seems to be the case as colors etc are shared), its current publication constitutes a copyright violation. Derivations of free works licensed under a viral license such as CC-BY-SA must be similarly free when published. The only exception would be a private non-free license by the copyright holder of the map at Commons to the Eupedia site. This appears unlikely. In summary, I think, that it does not help us much here that probably Eupedia violates copyright. Unless the original author puts some pressure on Eupedia to change the license of the derived map, we have to delete this as well. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- This file posted by eupedia.com is a derivative of File:Distribution Haplogroup R1b Y-DNA.svg by User:Phirosiberia. This in turn derives from File:R1b-map.JPG by User:Cadenas2008. If a site uses Wikipedia for its updates, then why would we stop Commons do the same for the same site? In these maps coincide gradient colors by Phirosiberia, and style and geographic region by Cadenas2008.--Maulucioni (talk) 16:17, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- "Tit for tat" is an appealing moral principle but has no basis in law. Dcoetzee (talk) 16:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- This file posted by eupedia.com is a derivative of File:Distribution Haplogroup R1b Y-DNA.svg by User:Phirosiberia. This in turn derives from File:R1b-map.JPG by User:Cadenas2008. If a site uses Wikipedia for its updates, then why would we stop Commons do the same for the same site? In these maps coincide gradient colors by Phirosiberia, and style and geographic region by Cadenas2008.--Maulucioni (talk) 16:17, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- The design of eupedia graphic is very close to the older cc-by-sa versions, but uses other base data, so it is quite difficult to prove it es derivative work. But, if eupedia wants to make trouble about this reimport, we could possibly check their usage of other commons media ... -- Smial (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- The dark red colour used for haplogroup R1b on Eupedia has been used since mid 2008 (for example on the History of European haplogroups page, which you can see using web history). The R1b map on Eupedia has been updated several times since 2008, but it entirely original (except the blank map, which was in the public domain at the time). I suppose that you are referring to this other map of R1b made by Crates in 2009. That map seems to be a copy of an earlier version of my map on Eupedia.
--Maciamo2
- Keep Most interesing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.59.164 (talk • contribs)
I think a) Maulucioni shoud upload own work using the latest SVG file and updating it even based on Eupedia work by giving credit to the source or b) this unsatisfying file format (GIF) with uncorrect author information (clearly a 1:1 copy from Eupedia) should be deleted. If the distribution map is completely reconstructed in a SVG and gives credit to the Eupedia source I would found it inappropriate if Maciamo2/Eupedia still requests deletion as copyvio. MartL --151.62.133.122 21:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
I don't see any evidence that the map on Eupedia is a derivative work of File:Distribution_Haplogroup_R1b_Y-DNA.svg. The underlying base map of Europe seems to be the same, but seems to be one of those free/PD base maps everyone here uses without caring to reference the original. The data shown in the map is obviously completely different from that in File:Distribution_Haplogroup_R1b_Y-DNA.svg – just look at it, there doesn't seem to be a single line (border between two colors) that's identical to those in our SVG. Hence, the Eupedia-map is not automatically licensed CC-BY-SA for being a derivative work and our version of it has to be deleted. --El Grafo (talk) 12:49, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
- Although I agree with your conclusion, note that "automatic" licensing of works under CC-BY-SA never actually occurs, as explained above. Dcoetzee (talk) 00:04, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Is the data on which the distribution is based in the public domain? If it is, I would tend to Keep the file, since it would be mere representation of public domain data, and therefore not above the threshold of originality.-- Darwin Ahoy! 02:52, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- The question is not meaningful as mere data is not copyrightable. Moreover, the image involved many creative choices in how it chose to depict the data, and it is those to which copyright attaches, not the underlying data itself. Dcoetzee (talk) 19:41, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- Then the "borders" people are talking about above are directly drawn by the public domain data, and should not be an issue here. What is the issue then? The placement of the numbers? The choice of colours? Are choices of colours copyrightable at all? Or label positions, for that matter? -- Darwin Ahoy! 19:49, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- By the way, this kind of representation is not a "creative choice" at all, it's standard. I've used it for a number of data representations while in University. I can't recall it's name, but it's very much a standard way to represent a distribution map. If the data is on public domain, then a mere computer software can generate that graphic, no creative process involved.-- Darwin Ahoy! 19:54, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- Assuming the underlying map is public domain, copyright would attach to choices like the placement of labels and choice of colours, and possibly more minor things like the geographic region depicted and the smoothness of the region boundaries. I'm uncertain because Commons:TOO#United_States lists a particular image (File:Arkansas map by Sean Pecor.png) of a coloured map with labels which was found to be non-copyrightable (see file description page for details). The question is whether introduction of multiple regions with different colours can elevate this map above the threshold of originality - it's very close to the line and I am not confident making a judgement. Dcoetzee (talk) 20:14, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- I do not understand how images consisting of PD text, whatever the font used, are generally considered below the TO, with the "choice of colours" always olympically ignored, and it would be of any matter here. I doubt very much label positions are creative in this case, they are more or less centred, and when that is not possible, they are placed where the region is wider enough, and those which would hardly be seen over the background colour are placed sideways. It's pretty much what you, me, or any person drawing such a distribution map would do, it's practical, not original.
- About the map, it is almost certainly just a redrawn of a map from a scientific publication, like the ones that are shown here, or the intersection/union of some of such maps published in scientific publications (those maps being public domain, I believe, since they are the data themselves, no?). Otherwise, it would be "Maciamo2 map", copyrightable, perhaps, but useless for us. This brings us to one of the main problems I see here. This, and this, in fact. All those maps lack a source, we don't know where that data came from. Where did Crates get that data? Based on what data Cadenas changed the map to his new version? Why is Wikipedia using unsourced "Crates map" and "Cadenas map"? May I draw a new "scientific" map of the distribution of Haplogroup R1b Y-DNA out of my mind, and if I'm reliable enough (and my Wikipedia colleagues uncritical enough) to keep it in some sister project for enough time, it becomes on scope? What should we do to this kind of material?
- Having said this, if the proper source or sources for this map is/are found, I do believe it is public domain, and no "borders" there can be copyrightable, since it's the only way to draw such a distribution map based on what was published. If not, it should be deleted, since it could be (I do not believe it is, but could be), with all due respect to Maciamo2, "Maciamo2 map" - an image created by Maciamo2 out of his mind - and in that case probably copyrightable, and out of scope as well. As I said above, the choice of colours and label positions are what matters less here, I do not believe those to be even near the threshold of originality, and if by some weird design they are, a new version can be drawn from the source maps (or from this very map) just changing the tiny bits that are deemed to be changed. -- Darwin Ahoy! 21:07, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- By the way, there is not really a "choice of colours" here, rather a choice of tones or shades (or whatever it is). They seem to be all variations of exactly the same colour (red), from dark to light, as would be expected in a distribution map, though I doubt it makes any difference. I doubt as well that there is any institution in the (free) world that can dictate what colours or shades I must choose in a distribution map.-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:32, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 07:42, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
