Commons:Deletion requests/2024/11/19

18 November 2024

20 November 2024

Deletion requests on 19 November 2024

November 19

File:Mister Sunday.jpg

No such free license seen at source site. Unused. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:02, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:30996951316264ل.jpg

Out of scope as unusablly low quality The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Dmartin969 (talk) 22:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Art in Giardini-Naxos depicting Nike di Kalkis

The sculpture Nike di Kalkis in Giardini-Naxos has been created by Carmelo Mendola (link to itwiki) who died in 1976. Alas, there is no freedom of panorama in Italy, confer COM:FOP Italy. Hence these four files have unfortunately to be deleted.

Speravir 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Eric Harris jr (talk · contribs)

Dubious own work claim

Zaxxon0 (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not own work. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RUN by Cirque at Luxor - Dec 2019 - Stierch 5.jpg

Possible copyright infringement, the screen of the scene in this show is likely copyrighted Itscyp (talk) 01:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dltjrrb1122 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dltjrrb1122 (talk · contribs)

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.

✗plicit 02:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santiago Giménez - 2023.jpg

No cuenta con la licencia Creative Commons. Mauricio C. (talk) 02:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mauricio C.

Keep El vídeo tiene laciencia Creative Commons https://web.archive.org/web/20231012050638/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5lQ1uJgZlA Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 04:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tienes razón, mi error fue no ver la web archivada. Desconozco porque ahora le quitaron la licencia, pero en el momento en que se subió sí la tenía. Una disculpa. Mauricio C. (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Works by Brazilian public organs are uploaded with generic licenses. Filipe46 (talk) 14:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brazilian Presidential Car 2024.jpg

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Works of the Brazillian Government are not public domain. Dmartin969 (talk) 22:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lula G20 Brazil 2024.webm

Obviously not old enough to be in PD A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP The image is not in PD for being old, but because of PD-BrazilGov. Just like File:Joe Biden presidential portrait.jpg is PD for the US counterpart laws. :ExclusiveEditor (talk) 07:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @A1Cafel: If you opened this by mistake, you may close it. ExclusiveEditor (talk) 11:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - US copyright laws are not the same as Brazilian copyright laws. The template said "It is a work published or commissioned by a Brazilian government (federal, state, or municipal) prior to 1983"--A1Cafel (talk) 11:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Works of the Brazillian Government are not public domain. Dmartin969 (talk) 22:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sea-Ceptor-missile.jpg

No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no evidence of free license. Dmartin969 (talk) 23:00, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frankie Yip - POPFEST (Jason Kui).jpg

Author is yiktung82659430, not uploader, see EXIF shizhao (talk) 02:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is my own work for my idol. This image is uploaded for the category that is pending. May I ask the reason why you want to delete?

I can provide the information for this image:

Camera: Sony SLT A57

Lens: α lens SAL55200-2 DT 55-200mm F4-5.6 SAM Kerororororororo (talk) 05:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kerororororororo: I imagine they're looking at the metdata and seeing the diffrent name. It might help for you to submit a VRTS ticket. Dmartin969 (talk) 23:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't know why the author name will show yiktung82659430, but my real name is yik tung. I don't know if it is related to the photo location in my Macbook when I upload it. Kerororororororo (talk) 06:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, no evidence of copyvio. 23:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Milano - Torre San Babila - 01.jpg

No FoP in Italy, architect Alessandro Rimini died in 1976 A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milano - Torre San Babila - 02.jpg

No FoP in Italy, architect Alessandro Rimini died in 1976 A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Torre Snia Viscosa Milano 1.jpg

No FoP in Italy, architect Alessandro Rimini died in 1976 A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Torre Snia Viscosa Milano 2.jpg

No FoP in Italy, architect Alessandro Rimini died in 1976 A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milano - edificio corso Venezia 1.jpg

No FoP in Italy, architect Alessandro Rimini died in 1976 A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palazzo Corso Venezia 1.jpg

No FoP in Italy, architect Alessandro Rimini died in 1976 A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Hôtels de Région Languedoc-Roussillon

No FoP in France, architect Ricardo Bofill died in 2022

A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74397.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kiev (233498509).jpeg

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And what is the protected monument??? -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton^m 07:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Grave of Kaya (Père-Lachaise, division 71)

No FoP in France, the subject died in 2000, so the author of this grave is unlikely to be dead for 70 years

A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riga, Latvia (7182823681).jpg

No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mežaparka estrāde detail.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First time uploading a file on Wikipedia commons. I thought the main issue was to own the picture, which is the case. My excuses for not being acquainted with these regulations. Out of pure interest, what does this mean in the broad image - no pictures whatsoever can be uploaded into wikipedia anymore? How is this expected to work? Kihvi (talk) 06:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tổ sư Thạch Liêm.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) 源義信 (talk) 03:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The uploader used wrong copyright template (CC-4.0), while this is a copy of an ancient painting ([1], [2]) 源義信 (talk) 03:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mežaparks Great Bandstand side view.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mežaparks Great Bandstand.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mežaparka estrāde.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First time uploading a file on Wikipedia commons. I thought the main issue was to own the picture, which is the case. My excuses for not being acquainted with these regulations. In any case, how does this affect the broad case? No pictures whatsoever can be uploaded? Only the owner of this structure or the architect are deemed capable of doing so? Kihvi (talk) 06:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mežaparka estrāde skatuve.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RigaBruninieku29-31.jpg

No FoP in Latvia, architect Alfred Karr died in 1949 and Kurt Betge died in 1963 A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Occupation-museum.jpg

No FoP in Latvia, architect Gunārs Lūsis-Grīnbergs died in 2015 A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tổ Minh Hải.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) 源義信 (talk) 03:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: According to the text on the painting, it was painted in 2022 by Đinh Thanh Minh (Tâm An). This file is in high quality and can't be find somewhere else. Please consider the possibility that the uploader is the artist himself. 源義信 (talk) 03:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canuto García.jpg

The name of author and the date death of author this image are not mentioned. Worried that the image is still under copyright protection. Astrinko (talk) 03:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the name of the author, which is a goverment corporation, non profit, payed by taxpayers. The sourse explicit says: "complete or partial reproduction authorized, as long as the source is mentioned." Page 2 at the bottom. P4blogarcia (talk) 15:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Titans Vilnis piemineklis Baumanu K.jpg

No FoP in Latvia, sculptor Vilnis Titāns died in 2006 A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument to Lea Davidova-Medene in Oak Park, Bishkek.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Kyrgyzstan A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This monument is in the public domain because it was donated to the city (see File:Plate in Sculpture Museum in the open air, Oak Park 2024-09-02 (ru).jpg), also the law authorises the free use of works permanently located in public places (see Copyright in Kyrgyzstan^{[2017 Article 27(3)]} ). Incall ^talk 03:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Media missing permission as of 11 November 2024

This file was initially tagged as no permission (No permission since)

Krd 03:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Latgales Mara.jpg

No FoP in Latvia, sculptor Leons Tomasickis died in 1996 A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Livonians marker in Staicele -20190413.jpg

No FoP in Latvia, sculptor Zigrīda Džoana Rapa died in 2024 and Juris Rapa died in 2022 A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thiền sư Minh Hải - Pháp Bảo.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) 源義信 (talk) 03:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: According to the text on the painting, it was painted in 2022 by Đinh Thanh Minh (Tâm An). This file is in high quality and can't be find somewhere else. Please consider the possibility that the uploader is the artist himself. 源義信 (talk) 03:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tổ sư MINH HẢI - PHÁP BẢO.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) 源義信 (talk) 03:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: According to the text on the painting, it was painted in 2022 by Đinh Thanh Minh (Tâm An). This file is in very high quality and can't be find somewhere else. Please consider the possibility that the uploader is the artist himself. 源義信 (talk) 03:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cố Hoà thượng Thích Tâm Giác.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) 源義信 (talk) 03:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The person in the photo died in 1973, the file could be undeleted in the future according to it. 源義信 (talk) 03:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep "anonymous work first published more than 75 years ago." --RAN (talk) 12:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chaim Frenkel monument in Shiauliai, Lithuania, in a rainy day 02.jpg

No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Romualdas Kvintas died in 2018 and architect Alvidas Songaila is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chaim Frenkel monument in Shiauliai, Lithuania, in a rainy day 01.jpg

No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Romualdas Kvintas died in 2018 and architect Alvidas Songaila is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This is bordering on de minimis. You really can't see any details of the statue. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weebl - Flickr - Beny Shlevich.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Lithuania A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HT Thích Quảng Độ.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://sentrangusa.com/2021/03/12/sen-trang-tong-hop-thanh-kinh-tuong-niem-le-tieu-tuong-duc-de-ngu-tang-thong-ghpgvntn-truong-lao-hoa-thuong-thich-quang-do/ 源義信 (talk) 03:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: the person in the photo died in 2020 (vi:Thích Quảng Độ), the file should be undelete in the future according to it. 源義信 (talk) 03:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juozas Mikenas Grave1.JPG

No FoP in Lithuania, the subject died in 1964 so the creator of the grave is unlikely to be dead for 70 years A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juozas Mikenas Grave2.JPG

No FoP in Lithuania, the subject died in 1964 so the creator of the grave is unlikely to be dead for 70 years A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A380 العملاق.jpg

Out of COM:SCOPE as plain text The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Đại lão Hòa thượng Thích Huyền Quang.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) 源義信 (talk) 03:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: the person in this photo died in 2008 (vi:Thích Huyền Quang), the file should be undelete in the future according to it. 源義信 (talk) 03:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Đại lão Hòa thượng Thích Đôn Hậu.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) 源義信 (talk) 03:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The person in this portrait died in 1992, the file should be undeleted in the future according to it. 源義信 (talk) 03:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG 7112-Edit (3619676586).jpg

No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image has been uploaded by the designer under a free licence. Pelmeen10 (talk) 04:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The architect of this building (Karli Luik, see: https://estonianarchitecture.com/project/emu-sports-hall/) and the Flickr user who shared this photo under a free license are one and the same person, thus permission can be assumed as the architect has the rights to his work and can license derivative works of it as he wishes. Nakonana (talk) 16:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Đại lão Hoà thượng Thích Tâm Châu.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) 源義信 (talk) 03:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The person in this photo died in 2015, however based on his age and other photographs of him, it is assumed that this photograph was taken before this century. The file should be undeleted in the future. 源義信 (talk) 03:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears to be more than 75 years old so meets the PD-Vietnam license. --RAN (talk) 13:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Konstantin Päts memorial.jpg

No FoP in Estonia, both sculptor Vergo Vernik and architect Toivo Tammik is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طاولة ذات مِفْرَشْ أنيق.jpg

Low quality AI image (nonsense plates, furniture). Easily replacable with freely licensed actual photo. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as misgenerated, tablecloth also makes no sense. Belbury (talk) 14:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:National Assembly Building in Ljubljana.jpg

No FoP in Slovenia, architect Vinko Glanz died in 1977 A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peta vseslovenska ljudska vstaja (8685721591).jpg

No FoP in Slovenia, architect Vinko Glanz died in 1977 A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:KASONGO NGANDU 001.png

This file was initially tagged by 北極企鵝觀賞團 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 03:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PRISM Pride Parade 0021.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 03:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ted polar plunge.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 03:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ted Speech.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 03:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ted Wheeler and Jennifer Williamson at an anti gun rally (cropped).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 03:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ted Wheeler and Jennifer Williamson at an anti gun rally.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 03:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mayor Cianci (1).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 03:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What are you referring to? SecretName101 (talk) 05:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mayor Cianci.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 03:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What are you referring to? SecretName101 (talk) 05:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, how do you know? It would be best to make these things clear. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Snake River - Mora Minnesota.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 03:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Narodni dom 04 07 2021.jpg

No FoP in Italy, architect Max Fabiani died in 1962 A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question Would that fall under COM:TOO Italy? The page says it's a very high threshold for industrial design but doesn't provide any examples. Nakonana (talk) 18:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:D804354.jpg

This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as no source (No source since) Krd 03:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also File:Tomohiro Hatta.jpg uploaded by the same user. Apocheir (talk) 04:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DaisukesugiyamaatIGLTAphotosession.jpg

This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as no source (No source since) Krd 03:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deai Bridge 20241027 (1).jpg

This file was initially tagged by %USER% as no source Krd 03:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomohiro Hatta.jpg

This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as no source (No source since) Krd 03:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also File:D804354.jpg uploaded by the same user. Apocheir (talk) 04:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:阪急.jpg

This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as no source (No source since) Krd 03:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Artist Mohsen Attya (talk · contribs)

Three paintings by living artist, not dead yet 70 years would require permission from COM:OTRS process for retention. User's other uploads have included outright copyvios of other living and recently deceased artists works.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:45, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Artist Mohsen Attya (talk · contribs)

No indication of user's own work on these two diagrams. Probable COM:COPYVIO. User's other uploads are all modern art.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Artist Mohsen Attya (talk · contribs)

Modern artworks by presumably living artist... is the artist notable, and if so, can COM:OTRS permissions be received? Commons is not a free hosting site for personal artworks.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:48, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS needed. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Artist Mohsen Attya (talk · contribs)

Further uploads from this user with no COM:PERMISSION.

Belbury (talk) 14:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Missing permission via COM:VRT. --Wdwd (talk) 14:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Artist Mohsen Attya (talk · contribs)

I removed all of these images from ar.wikibooks articles, where the uploader was self-promoting their own work. I don't think these are within COM:SCOPE.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kidnapped flyer in Stanford University during 2023 Israel–Hamas war - 9 (cropped).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What are we talking about here? It's an image of flyers. By definition, they are meant to be viewed freely by the public. Joalbertine (talk) 13:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joalbertine: The copyright of any work - in this case the photos in the flyers - belongs to the person that created that work. Freedom of panorama is a set of laws in some countries that essentially handwave away that copyright for photos of copyrighted works that are permanently positioned in public places (buildings, statues, murals, etc. - what is and isn't FoP varies from country to country). In the United States, there is no FoP for 2d works, like flyers, so this image is a violation of the copyright of the photographers of the photos in those flyers. This has come up a lot with the Kidnapped series - especially because in in most (all) countries with FoP, including Israel, FoP specifically states that the work has to be permanently situated in a public place, and flyers aren't permanent. I'm sorry, but A1Cafel is right in this case. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kidnapped flyer in Stanford University during 2023 Israel–Hamas war - 9.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2023.11.14 March for Israel, Washington, DC USA 318 201256.jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corona Distance at Kosaka Hospital (1).jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corona Distance at Kosaka Hospital (2).jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bezak berilgan choynak.jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GOLDORAK JOUET FIGURINE.jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jugete.jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Junior Trix Metallbaukasten.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kid toy.jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:02, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mario peluche.jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nerfuls Rein.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I took this picture and think it adds value to the Neful page. If there's some kind of copyright issue or policy against pictures of packaging, I won't object. I think it adds value to the Nerful page. Earein (talk) 04:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Earein, look at the fair use policy of whichever Wikipedias you might upload to locally. Commons has no COM:Fairuse. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nev the Bear Toy Large.png

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Odd Apple Bean.png

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tiki Juice Bar Specialties.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Booster Juice Cups! (2424553662).jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bignay juice.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Images taken out a west facing window of TTC bus traveling southbound on Sherbourne, 2015 05 12 (102).JPG - panoramio.jpg

I took this photo, I uploaded it to Panoramio. But someone else transferred it from Panoramio to the Commons... It's blurry. I think it should be deleted because it is blurry... Geo Swan (talk) 04:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 蛇口 Shekou 沃爾瑪 Walmart Store August 2018 IX2 Lemon Tea Ice bottle drink.jpg

Ice Tea packaging, please see: COM:PACKAGE 茅野ふたば (talk) 04:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SKD TKO Po Yap Road 將軍澳廣場 Tseung Kwan O Plaza K-mart fresh food indoor market shop Kai Bo Food Supermarket goods Tingyi Master Kong Lemon Tea plastic bottles July 2021 SS2.jpg

Ice Tea packaging, please see: COM:PACKAGE 茅野ふたば (talk) 04:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳城市規劃展覽館 Shenzhen City Planning Exhibition Hall Quality Life sign Jan 2017 Lnv2.jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted image 茅野ふたば (talk) 04:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:变体假名（部分）.png

I don't see where the license is in the source page Thyj (talk) 04:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest to delete it. When I first update the picture, I really cannot find its real source. Maybe it could be find in a Unicode proposal, however, I have no time to confirm it now. It could be replaced by other legal pictures. Hatsunium (talk) 07:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bangla WikiConference 2024 in 15 November 09.jpg

Out of scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 05:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support as uploader. Mehedi Abedin 05:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Videos by Yumdaeng, 2018

Out of scope: All of these Korean video blogs seem to have been somehow gotten imported from YouTube with no sound. I'm not certain if they'd be in scope even if the sound were present, but as silent videos they're clearly unusable.

Omphalographer (talk) 05:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per this discussion page, and per this discussion ("... However, the inclusion of subtitles means that the educational use of the video, ... is sufficient for keeping on Commons."), there is no Commons policy that demands videos on the site should contain sounds such as music and voices (even some of Youtube videos do not have sounds, in this case, due to copyright-related reasons of the background music.) The videos describes Korean Internet personallties' normal business(Yumdaeng(윰댕)), not just a private situation. Puramyun31 (talk) 09:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is no Commons policy that says that video clips shall have sound, true. But transforming video clips that originally were made with sound into silent movies is also removing their educational usability. Actors in silent movies do act in a way that their visual representation remains understandable even without sound, but this is not the case where filmed persons rely on sound and vocalizations to communicate with their watchers. A single administrative opinion in Commons:Deletion_requests/File:포체티노_단독_인터뷰_2편!!_"한국에_가고_싶어요"_(GOAL_인터뷰).webm is no immutable case law and can be overturned if and when needed (especially as this "keep" opinion disregarded an earlier deleting decision about the same case and file). Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 11:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Masum-al-hasan/Credits

Request from user. Rocky Masum (talk) 05:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rocky ভাই, আপনি কি নিশ্চিত আপনার সকল ছবি থেকে {{User:Masum-al-hasan/Credits}} সরিয়ে {{User:RockyMasum/Credits}} করা হয়েছে? ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 07:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:孳-bigseal-L01347.svg

i made a mistake Wikiuser3315 (talk) 05:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nisga'a Flag.jpg

Copyright violation. No evidence this is public domain and it is too complex to be simple geometry. Official flags are by default copyrighted in Canada. This flag was created in 2001 by Lloyd McDames and Peter McKay and I can find no evidence of it being released to public domain or creative commons. Its initial posting on the Nisga'a government website came with a copyright symbol beneath it: https://web.archive.org/web/20011205183330/http://www.nisgaalisims.ca/flag.html Intervex (talk) 06:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:슈당연의.djvu

The copyright may not be expired in South Korea. We can't find when the translator died. It is assumed that he was alive until mid 1950s. Reference: http://www.ujeil.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=45341 Motoko C. K. (talk) 06:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:도술유명한 소강절젼.djvu

The copyright may not be expired in South Korea. We can't find when the author died. Motoko C. K. (talk) 06:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Victoria harbour – night (6215081870).jpg

unclear, very hard to see EX Centre from Star Avenue 2018 (talk) 06:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not really hard to see the light reflections. It can be flipped 90 degrees if you like. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Victoria harbour – night (6215081470).jpg

very hard to see EX Centre from Star Avenue 2018 (talk) 07:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not that hard. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alireza Yandankhah3.jpg

This is screenshot of television broadcast, possibly copyrighted. Astrinko (talk) 07:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alireza yazdankhah2.jpg

This is screenshot of television broadcast, possibly copyrighted. Astrinko (talk) 07:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cherry Blossoms at the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial (ff64871a-a62b-45aa-fbc0-1303f30de109).jpg

Copyrighted sculpture (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Martin Luther King, Jr. National Memorial) – BMacZero (🗩) 07:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marvel vs. Capcom 2 Character Select Screen.jpg

There is a copyrighted game screenshot on the photo. Astrinko (talk) 07:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Yes, derivative works. 茅野ふたば (talk) 08:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete F1. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 01.jpg

Derivative work of non free content. There is no Freedom_of_panorama in Mongolia for this. Yann (talk) 07:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:稲荷神社拝殿.jpg

外観が大幅に変わり、情報が古くなったからです。 Mitanimasayuki (talk) 08:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Google translation: "The look has changed drastically and the information is out of date." Great. Then this is a historical photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Ikan. In-scope photo. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 10:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atish-e-Chinar front page.png

uploaded with claim of CC licence, but nothing in the source indicates that DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biography 1.jpg

PR, deliberately false categorization. A joke? Nicoljaus (talk) 09:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Out of scope. Screenshot of a self-bio...unused and no foreseeable educational use. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 10:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peoples IMG 0149 (1295423327).jpg

Personal holiday snap per COM:PERSONAL Rept0n1x (talk) 09:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete F10, personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Street life (5513017877).jpg

No FoP in UK for 2D graphics works per COM:FOP UK Rept0n1x (talk) 09:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Street life (21820402082).jpg

No FoP in UK for 2D graphics works per COM:FOP UK Rept0n1x (talk) 09:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Newlyweds (6071088190).jpg

Personal holiday snap per COM:PERSONAL Rept0n1x (talk) 09:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete F10, personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corendon Airlines 2014 logo.png

Copyright infringement Corendonairlinestr (talk) 09:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Selling bread in İçərişəhər, Baku.jpg

Appears to be a screenshot, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 09:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not own work. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flame Towers in Baku (2012).jpg

No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 09:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flame Towers.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan - Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Former_Soviet_Union Mifter (talk) 06:50, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:17, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flame Towers.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 09:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sabayil, Baku, Azerbaijan - panoramio (33).jpg

No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 09:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Ritz-Carlton Baku.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 09:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sevirəm parkı 11.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 09:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harry Villegas.jpg

Source is EcuRed, likely https://www.ecured.cu/Archivo:Harry-Villegas.jpg uploaded in 2013 and there is a previous version without thumbnail uploaded in April 9, 2010. However, the photo already was already on the web in March in March 26, 2010, see https://guerradeangola.com/2010/03/26/bajo-fuego-enemigo/. Günther Frager (talk) 09:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Devendra Koli Sign.png

Signature of a non-notable person, out of scope A1Cafel (talk) 10:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete F10. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:3D 2020-175a-Stereo Photo 3D (50145660852).jpg

This stereoscopic image has been Flickrwashed by its creator. The tornado images that were used to make it come from a copyrighted video by storm chaser Pecos Hank. You can see one of his images on his Facebook page [3] and the whole video from which the stereoscope image were taken is on YouTube here. The images were taken from around the 2:58 mark.

Without any evidence that the videographer has released these images into the public domain or under a free license, we can't host this here. Rlandmann (talk) 10:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wladimīrs Toporōws.jpg

This image is taken from what looks to be an unofficial, translated Wikipedia mirror at https://wikipedia.prusaspira.org which the uploader claims on File:Klussis2005.jpg uses ShareAlike 3.0. But I can only see a statement on the front page that the site's text is CC-licenced. The images don't appear to have any licence statements, and some (such as the cartoon clip http://wikipedia.prusaspira.org/index.php/File:Loituma.gif on that same front page) are clearly copyrighted, Wikipedia uses the same image under fair use.

Other files with the same issue:

--Belbury (talk) 10:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes. Managed to mess that one up.
At the time I may have thought the site saying the text being ShareAlike 3.0, meant that the images were too. Not how it works, is it?
But wait, if that GIF that you just mentioned is actually in fair use, then why not these images? Apparently, fair use can be used for educational purposes...
But since we don't even know what the copyright for this image actually is, does it even work?
I also found a few replacements, however there are problems with all of them;

kvb.lt says ©, but doesn't tell us what copyright it is.

tiesos.lt ([4] [5] [6]) doesn't specify, but it seems to be CC 3.0.

Since tiesos.lt seems to have CC 3.0 (The contents of the site can be distributed by inserting a functioning link. -tiesos.lt), File:Klussis2005.jpg can be deleted, for a good replacement seems to have been found. Kxeo (talk) 15:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The GIF I link to is hosted on the English Wikipedia, which allows fair use uploads. To upload a fair use image of these people to the English Wikipedia, you'd have to make the case there that no equivalent free image existed or could be made in future (which may be reasonable, if they're deceased).

Commons doesn't allow fair use uploads. Belbury (talk) 16:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well then; it looks like all 3 have to be deleted. Oops. Kxeo (talk) 16:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:El consejo de las tres tías, Roberto Ossaye, 1948.jpg

Roberto Ossaye died in 1954. This 1948 painting is still protected in the country of origin (Guatemala) untill 2030 and in the US until 2044 due to the URAA. 81.41.176.97 10:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The author died 70 years ago El Nuevo Doge (talk) 19:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@El Nuevo Doge: Wrong, 70 years since the author’s death did not passed yet. For almost copyright laws, the copyright expires at the beginning of the year following the 70th anniversary of the author’s death (for the case of an author deceased in 1954, on New Year’s Day of 2025). However, in Commons (more info here), works must to be at least in the Public Domain both in the United States and their country of origin (if different from the U.S.). So, although this work would be PD in many countries next year, unfortunately we cannot keep it yet, as in its country of origin (Guatemala) it wouldn’t be in the public domain until 2030 (Guatemala has a copyright term of 75 years p.m.a., see here). Also, for the other hand, its U.S. copyright also persists until January 1, ~~2030~~ 2044, 95 years after the work’s first [presumed] publication due to being still copyrighted in Guatemala in 1996 (the URAA date of restoration for Guatemala). 81.41.185.128 10:35, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info: 2030 as the U.S. copyright expiration date is wrong (1948 + 95 + 1 = 2044). I apparently couldn't count yesterday, though I've revised my comments above. The U.S. copyright will expire on January 1, 2044. 81.41.185.128 22:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Still copyrighted in the US due to URAA (also in its country of origin but that last until next year.) Günther Frager (talk) 09:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info: @Günther Frager according with COM:Guatemala, the copyright in its country of origin lasts until 2030 (75 years after the author’s death). However, in 2030 would be also still copyrighted in the U.S. due to the URAA, so the file can be undeleted only after 2044. 81.41.185.128 11:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification! I agree, the US copyright is the longest. Günther Frager (talk) 11:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1954+70=2024 PUBLIC DOMAIN El Nuevo Doge (talk) 20:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@El Nuevo Doge: Firstly, Guatemala has 75 years pma protection and not 70 as point out by the IP user. Secondly, URAA restoration date was in 1996, so it is not PD in the US. Lastly, copyright last until December 31, so the right calculation would be 1954 + 70 + 1 = 2025. Günther Frager (talk) 20:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colorado Mountain Tornado.jpg

Uploader claimed this to be CC-BY-SA, but at the source, it's CC-BY-NC-ND, which is not free enough for the Commons. We can't keep this here. Rlandmann (talk) 10:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find current contact information for the original author, nor can I find where NWS shared the photo (which often states permissions). If the license doesn't allow for use here that was my unintentional mistake and the file may be deleted -BusyWikipedian (talk) 17:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Silicon Travels.svg

out of com:ps. this map contain that someone traveled regions. eien20 (talk) 10:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marquette, Kansas EF4 tornado on April 14, 2012.png

Uploader claims this as their own work, but it is simply a crop of someone else's photo -- File:April 14, 2012 Marquette, Kansas EF4 tornado.JPG -- for which deletion is currently requested as a presumably unfree image. Rlandmann (talk) 10:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. Wolfgang Blank.jpg

possible copyvio © Thomas Kunsch - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:- panoramio (372).jpg

This image has been copied very many times, and the version we're hosting has been laundered through Panaoramio. The original photographer is weather photographer and storm chaser Mike Hollingshead. He offers it for licensing on his website Storm and Sky (image STA1333).

This is an unfree image and we can't host it here. Rlandmann (talk) 11:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WilkinCountyEF4 (2).jpg

This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder.

Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 11:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Growth2023.png

The background image is likely a copyright violation. Toadspike (talk) 11:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination, appears to be a stock photo we can assume to be copyrighted. Reverse image search shows the background image being used across random articles across the web (e.g. [7]), and a close variation of the background can be found on VectorStock (can't link VectorStock due to spam filter, but the path is royalty-free-vector/world-trade-map-vector-264173). ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 10:14, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soneibau2021.jpg

same https://www.vill.fudai.iwate.jp/lifescene/koutsu.html, and COM:DW. eien20 (talk) 11:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lucas Kunce (Machinists Union Rally).jpg

EXIF data says "Screenshot". Yann (talk) 12:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A screenshot was used to crop the image from a personal photo. Inform if this is not permitted & best course of action to rectify the issue. Horizon Falling (talk) 12:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the photographer? If it is the case, please upload the original image with EXIF data. Otherwise, please ask the copyright holder to send a permission for a free license via COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 15:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the photographer, but I do not wish to publish the uncropped original image in its entirety as it includes other individuals. The screenshot was only a matter of convenience, if truly necessary I will crop the original image in another program & reupload. Horizon Falling (talk) 17:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stamps of Tajikistan, 014-08.jpg

The image on this stamp is not a work from Tajikstan, but from the US. The original photographer is weather photographer and storm chaser Mike Hollingshead. He offers it for licensing on his website Storm and Sky (image STA1333).

This is an unfree image and we can't host it here. Rlandmann (talk) 12:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johannes Mueller House 07.jpg

COM:Derivative works#Text. Photograph of what appears to be a post-1978 document that is above COM:TOO DanielPenfield (talk) 12:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Girardcr29.jpg

This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party. https://www.weather.gov/sgf/events_2003may4 -- click the "Pictures" tab

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder.

Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 12:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lindgren, Ingrid 1.tif

EXIF ("Foto Anders Roth, SR") doesn't match the Author field or uploader username. Belbury (talk) 13:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pandanales-phylogenesis.jpg

Low quality image nowhere used. Easily replaced with Template:Clade Alfa-ketosav (talk) 13:02, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2021-03-12 05 40 02 A bag of Snyder's of Hanover Honey Mustard & Onion Pretzel Pieces in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg

COM:PACKAGING DanielPenfield (talk) 13:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Model of NSWIT.jpg

The photograph is possibly still in copyright. In the period it was taken, the owner of the copyright is generally the client who commissioned it. The Institute, being an incorporated body, would not form part of the Crown (the Crown is strictly federal or state departments). Education, including universities, technical education and government schools, has generally not come under Crown copyright. Other unclear factors that may have impacted copyright status would be if the ownership has been transferred, which may have occurred as the legal structure of the now-university evolved repeatedly and substantially over the years. This casts reasonable doubt over ownership. As it is not in use and uploaded recently, it would not harm any projects when removed. Datassette (talk) 13:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Free minhaz photo.jpg

Copyrighted : FBMD0f0007580100005d0900000e160000d5170000e8190000f91e00008a2f0000c42f0000 — Delwar • 13:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Irish Football Association logo.svg

False license, it's not Franko1916's own work. It's a logo of Irish Football Association since at least 2019. --Corwin of Amber (talk) 13:00, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:第18回フライヤー.jpg

File created as advertisement, advertisement from Japan. Astrinko (talk) 13:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A longer cumming on masturbation.webm

Personal video by non-contributors, see COM:NUDITY Astrinko (talk) 13:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Commons:Nudity#New uploads. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arthur & Caroline Lily Drey with their children Claude, Elizabeth & Dorothy around 1927 Frankfurt Germany.jpg

The name of the photographer and the photographer's date on this photo are not mentioned, the copyright license is doubtful. Astrinko (talk) 13:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Swisshide.gif

the uploader tagged ja:WP:CSD#G8 on jawp (special:diff/oldid=521320758) but someone was imported. I respect them opinion. and low quarity. eien20 (talk) 13:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Automatic10 (talk · contribs)

One AI-generated historical portrait, one strangely colourised one with no original source. Neither in use, both uploaded by a now-globally blocked user who was blocked from enwiki for misrepresenting sources.

Belbury (talk) 13:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coumarin120 mesomeric.png

replaced by file:Coumarin120 mesomerism.svg NadirSH (talk) 14:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Петров О.М..jpg

Likely not own work: visual characteristics suggest screengrab, DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not own work. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graz Hauptbahnhof bei Tag.jpg

Not a useful picture, similar versions already existing Maxthurner (talk) 14:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No reason for deletion. Herbert Ortner (talk) 22:04, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graz Hauptbahnhof bei Nacht.jpg

Not a useful picture, similar versions already existing Maxthurner (talk) 14:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/pngwing.com

All pngwing.com image pages seem to say the same thing, Licence: Non-commercial use, DMCA Contact Us. Their poorly translated terms of use at https://www.pngwing.com/terms-of-use also says that they can't guarantee any copyright statements they make are genuine:

As all PNG images in PNGWing are derived from the network users to share(self-design or cut out from unknown user's JPG files), so PNGWing does not have sufficient monitoring capabilities to review the picture there are infringement and other circumstances. The user should consciously abide by the copyright law and other relevant laws and regulations, shall not infringe the legal rights of this site and the right holder, To PNGWing and any third party losses, infringing users should bear full responsibility.

Belbury (talk) 14:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bahngleis mit Cityjet am Grazer Hauptbahnhof.jpg

Not a useful picture, similar versions already existing Maxthurner (talk) 14:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bangla WikiConference 2024 - Day 2 by SHEIKH 64.jpg

Duplicate of Bangla WikiConference 2024 - Day 2 by SHEIKH 65.jpg Rocky Masum (talk) 14:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chab chab.jpg

Copyright violation. Author is Jean Marie Marion according to this source. If it's really own work of the uploader, we may need VRT verification. Ratekreel (talk) 14:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hakim Meliboev (talk).jpg

Out of scope --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 14:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Takaaki matsuo.jpg

cropped from https://web.archive.org/web/20210430054550/https://www.simple-life.style/about eien20 (talk) 15:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Devil of Gothic Europa.jpg

Unused random photo through window with doodle, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete pr nom. Taylor 49 (talk) 15:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Petřínská rozhledna v noci.png

very low resolution, blurred, see cat for better night views of the tower — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Moreover, I doubt that it's Petřín Tower. I looks like Eiffel tower and thus FoP doesn't apply for its illumination. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks too small to be the Eiffel tower, and there are too many trees around it. The two towers do resemble each other, though. Other illumination examples of the one in Pragu: File:Petřínské sady, Praag, Tsjechië Aug 19, 2019 09-14-38 PM.jpeg, File:Aussichtsturm-01957.jpg, File:Petřín Lookout Tower at night.jpg, File:Overview of illuminated Petřín Tower in support of Ukraine during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine in Prague 04.jpg, File:Czech-03600 - Petrin Observation Tower (32173125974).jpg. So, its blurriness and the availability of alternatives should probably be the only deletion reasons. Nakonana (talk) 20:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete blurry and bad quality. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:12de232.png

Unusably tiny version of File:Charles Ernest Butler - King Arthur.jpg from the same source, uploaded later Nutshinou ^Talk! 15:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duomo di Milano detail.jpg

looks like cropped from other source, very likely to be an imagevio, precautional DR — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Tancrede Bourgeois (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in scope. The caption of the first listed file gives it away: those are Gastrotrich of the Pseudostomella kind. As you can see, there are wiki articles on them (with the latter lacking any illustrations, so that's where those diagrams can go). The other files seem to be anatomy details of those Pseudostomella. E.g. one of the files is named "Pentancre side view", and this paper on Pseudostomella is stating: "Pseudostomella cheraensis sp. nov. is the fourth taxon of the genus known from India; however, all the previous species reported hitherto from India have tetrancres instead of pentancres." (emphasis added by me) Nakonana (talk) 20:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One of the files even got a good name: File:Pseudostomella 7 dorsal papillae.jpg. I've added them all to Category:Pseudostomella. Nakonana (talk) 21:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Andyduf76 (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laura Schadeck no Sad Clud Fest em 2022.jpg

The description indicates that the author is the singer's photographer, and that the image was "given" to the journals. So it is a copyrighted image uploaded to commons under the justification of having been "given to the press" by the author, which does not indicate whether it is copyright free. MinerbNosk (talk) 16:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by NYSaints (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logos. Bayer logos are available in SVG.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Billboard art Ann St Fortitude Valley IMGP3321.jpg

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 16:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jesuslovesmeperfection (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Weak)

Keep.

While of low-ish quality (which can probably be blamed on early 2000s cameras) and personal, African countries tend to be underrepresented on Wiki projects and therefore deletion criteria might need to be applied a bit more lax.
For example, File:Sitting Room.jpg shows a room, and we have a "whopping" number of images of house interiors in Nigeria. In absolute numbers, that's three images. And that's after I added the above Sitting_Room.jpg and MY_BIRTHDAY.jpg to the relevant category (see Category:Rooms in Nigeria).
Then there's the Ajisi_Tourish_Hotel.jpg — a hotel that is located in Lagos, Nigeria. There are yet again "lots" of images in Category:Hotels in Lagos, Nigeria, i.e. there were three before I added some of the above images. Only two out of three depict(ed) hotel buildings, and rather than being of actual "local", Nigerian hotels, the two photos depict two international hotel chains from the United States of America (Radisson Hotel and Sheraton Hotel). With Ajisi Tourist Hotel we at least now have a local representative in that category, and locals will probably rather stay in such a hotel than in the two international fancy ones. American hotels are really not useful to illustrate Nigerian hotel culture. Ajisi Tourist Hotel probably gives a better idea of Nigerian hotels.
Furthermore, a lot of the images have people in them who are wearing traditional Nigerian clothing. I'd say that traditional clothing is clearly in project scope.
Then there are several photos featuring various celebrations. Some may be familiar to the Western Wikipedian (i.e. birthdays, baptism) and they might therefore consider those photos redundant, especially given the personal nature and low quality in this case. But I for one have never seen that someone changes their attire three times for their 75th birthday celebration. (Is that a local custom?) We also don't seem to have many photos of Nigerian baptism practices (or at least not enough for Category:Baptism in Nigeria to exist). We have plenty of images of baptism in Western countries, though, e.g. Category:Baptism in the United States, Category:Baptism in Germany, etc., and nobody is trying to delete them for being out of scope as personal images (even though they are undoubtedly all "personal photos", because "staged photos" might not be as educationally useful as "authentic photos"). So why should we delete authentic photos of Nigerian baptism, especially if we have so few of them? And, aside from that, what even is a "Celebration of Introduction" (i.e. CELEBRATION_OF_INTRODUCTION.jpg)? Do we have such celebrations somewhere in the west? I've never heard of such celebrations, so there's definitely something to learn about Nigerian celebrations for me. And the above image could help me learn. I need more information, more photos of this celebration rather than less. Why delete the already small information pool that we have? If it were just yet again a photo of Thanksgiving in the United States, and of low quality at that, then low quality is an argument for deletion given plenty of good quality alternatives. But if a single blurry, low resolution photo is all we have of a cultural heritage then we keep this one photo despite its quality, because that's all we have. So, do we have any other photos of this Celebration of Introduction thingy...?
Are Nigerian presidents and ministers out of scope...? Do we have plenty of high quality images of those politicians that we can justify (or afford) to delete them? American presidents have thousands of photos on Commons. Does Nigerian Wikipedia not need images of their politicians for illustration?
Was the COVID-19 pandemic handled the same way in Nigeria as in the West, so that we don't have a need for images on Covid in Nigeria...? Are the above Covid photos out of scope because they are low quality and there are plenty high quality alternatives...?

Nakonana (talk) 23:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coy Branscum.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coyote Kolb in Bali.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:تراكم الغيوم في السماء.jpg

There is absolutely no reason to have an AI image of clouds - which will never be as accurate as a picture - when we have thousands of pictures of actual clouds. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CLUSTERGRAMMERINTRO.png

Nonsense diagram that doesn't illustrate the concept it's supposed to - see especially the left edge The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Donald Duck in The Spirit Of '43 (US propaganda film).webm

Was not aware of this already-posted graph, upload appears to have been disallowed. I assume the screenshot of Donald I posted *should* be fine, looking at the graph and the screenshot of proto-Scrooge that has been up for a good while, it appears the Disney character segments are mostly PD, and it's the trenches/factory segments have the most issues - however there is a chance any non-photographed Donald imagery is prohibited as a whole (The Mad Doctor isn't uploaded in full and the only screenshots involving Pluto have his head on a chicken's for instance), but there's also a small few illustrations posted of copyrighted Disney characters, such as multiple Goofy stamps, an ensomble Christmas card, and the aforementioned chicken Pluto. File:Video Statistic for The Spirit of '43 (1943).png RockosModernLifeFan848 (talk) 16:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:El Toro R.C.jpg

Out of COM:SCOPE as plain text The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Document (1) page-0002.jpg
Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Robert92107 (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts and tables.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fatma Aslanpay.jpg

COM:DW photo of photo; license status of original photo needed -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi. i found that in the museum of independence. --Zemxer (talk) 19:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HinduVeershaivLingayatManch, Maharashtra.jpg

Copyright violation. See https://www.facebook.com/HinduVeershaivLingayatManch/?locale=hi_IN Bradv (talk) 16:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bradv it is a public organization. I am not aware of wikimedia laws, If it is not according to them, It could be deleted. Still according to me, it is not copyrighted. Thank You ! PerspicazHistorian (talk) 19:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.vskmumbai.org/tag/veershaiv-lingayat-samaj/ it exists on other websites too. PerspicazHistorian (talk) 19:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But you labeled it as your own work when you uploaded it. Bradv (talk) 21:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that, might be in hurry. I am not a full time wiki editor so please pardon with that. Do we need to delete this one and reupload it? PerspicazHistorian (talk) 03:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foto de perfil reverendo.jpg

This item have the wrong information post. BFloresrev (talk) 17:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ideal Toys Commercial - Kermit the Frog and Rowlf the Dog by Jim Henson.webm

While Kermit's status is somewhat ambigious (so the Henson sausage commercials I posted can *likely* stay up), Rowlf the Dog seems to almost certainly be under copyright. I was not aware of the rules relating to PD content of copyrighted characters, so this, as well as the screenshot of Rowlf I posted from the ad, should likely be removed RockosModernLifeFan848 (talk) 17:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:3D Movie Maker - Gregory.png

All other 3D Movie Maker files are 100% fine to my knowledge, however this particular file features the "McZee" character on a T-shirt, who is not permitted under an MIT license due to debuting in "Creative Writer" and "Fine Artist" before 3D Movie Maker, which have not been released under any kind of free use license. Gregory does have swappable outfits in the game, so this file is easily replacable. RockosModernLifeFan848 (talk) 17:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sports enhanced by creatine supplementation.png

For the same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ergogenic benefits of Creatine.png. While the research paper it came from is freely licensed, a screenshot of a block of text is mostly out of scope. Atomicdragon136 (talk) 17:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frank H. Buck was an oil tanker of the Associated Oil Company.png

It may have been created in 1924, but created does not show it was PUBLISHED before 1929 as the uploader's license indicates. The identical photo is present in 2008 at https://web.archive.org/web/20081121021828/http://caviews.com/Shipwrecks.html and it is not released as PD or CC-BY-SA and maybe in copyright until 2034, which is 70 years after Josselyn's death. This is my assessment after carefully reviewing According to COM:Hirtle Chart. Graywalls (talk) 17:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

* Keep - per license {PD-US-expired}, copyright: May 3, 1924. The following website says: "Frank H. Buck oil tanker of the, Associated Oil Company, and was 427 feet long she went on the rocks at Point Pinos, Pacific Grove on May 3, 1924

Lewis Josselyn Photo." Greg Henderson (talk) 18:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-1978 publication is a murky matter. U.S. courts have ruled that the sale of photographs from the photographer to another party have constituted publication. So provenance of the photograph must be considered. Abzeronow (talk) 18:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The website Graywalls linked to says this is from a negative, so we might have to consider that 2008 was the first publication. Abzeronow (talk) 18:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Abzeronow: , And the website uploader referenced is a product buying website and the seller is Monterey County Historical Society. If it's in the public domain, I am not sure why a digital file isn't offered in high resolution. It seems like the purpose of the photo being here might be to be a catalog in order to cause an increase print sale. Their own website https://mchsmuseum.com/local-history/people/california-views-the-pat-hathaway-collection-of-historical-photographs/ Graywalls (talk) 18:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two relevant pieces of information: "The initial collection, received from the window of Carmel photographer Lewis Josselyn in 1970, was the start of an avocation for the Monterey Peninsula’s premier photo archivist." and "Many of California Views’ images are one-of-a-kind, and Pat possesses the original glass plates (ranging in size from 4″ x 5″ to 11″ x 14″), film negatives (ranging in size from 35 mm to 8″ x 10″), original prints and postcards. He personally prints and mounts images from the Collection" Abzeronow (talk) 18:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also of potential relevance: https://www.montereyherald.com/2022/01/23/legacy-of-late-local-photographer-pat-hathaway-continues-on-at-monterey-county-historical-society/ . The website offered as the source by the uploader is the product selling outlet of the acquirer (Monterey County Historical Society) which stands to gain financially when someone buys prints from their store at fineartamerica.com. Graywalls (talk) 19:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Abzeronow: ,Of course, it's quite possible that plenty of them never made it to print or sold just like we only print a handful of pictures we actually take. For the picture in question, is it assumed published, if so when? He may have started doing this in the 1970s, but that doesn't mean the photograph in question was published at all, or published before March 1989. I am not sure what to in this situation. Do we assume the most restrictive assumption unless proven otherwise? Graywalls (talk) 19:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- There is no evidence that this photo was published (either in the normal or stictly legal sense of the word) prior to 1989, so it is presumably protected by copyright for 70 years after the death of the photographer. The COM:ONUS is on the uploader to provide evidence of details of any publication that would demonstrate that copyright had been lost or had expired. I note that there was a very similar photo published in The San Francisco Examiner on May 5, 1924, page 3 that could be used as a free alternative for anyone needing a photo of this ship or incident in the meantime. --Rlandmann (talk) 05:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was published the picture when left the photographer's custody. Yann (talk) 18:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Explicit: , I see you've been very active as an admin and been here for a long time. I am not sure what country you're in, but I was hopping you're familiar with matters relating to copyright matters in the United States. I have carefully reviewed https://copyrightalliance.org/faqs/what-make-image-published-registration/ Hirtle Chart but there's nothing said there that says it is assumed photograph is published as soon the image leaves the photographer's hands. I was wondering if you could shed light on this? Graywalls (talk) 19:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Yann -- Not necessarily; it depends entirely on when it left their custody and under what circumstances and conditions. It's just not as simple as that, and we do not have sufficient facts to make a determination one way or the other. --Rlandmann (talk) 21:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We have lots of photos by Lewis Josselyn -- if photography was his profession, he likely published many. That said, given the information found above for this particular photo, it seems like this one came from a negative sold or given by his widow to the author of that website in 1970. Unless we can find separate evidence of publication, it may well be that it wasn't published until the 1970s or even later. If copies from that owner were distributed without notice before 1989, they may have lost copyright, but we have no evidence of that. They would need to remain unpublished until 2003 to get only the 70pma term, which would expire in 2035 -- if first published between 1978 through 2002 the term would expire in 2048 due to a grandfather clause for unpublished works. If first published from 1970 through 1977, it would be 95 years from publication and thus last even longer than 2048, unless copies were actually distributed without notice (and we'd need evidence of that). Normally I don't quibble too much on evidence of publication, but in this case where it's from a negative obtained long after the photo was made and the author died, I think that puts it into the significant doubt area. If we can find any evidence of publication earlier, it would be OK, but I think we need to require that evidence in this case.

Delete Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This photograph, taken by Lewis Josselyn, was published on May 3, 1924, as indicated by a newspaper clipping referenced in this training manual, which credits Josselyn for the image. It is important to retain this photo as it has appeared in multiple publications.

In 1924, this wreck was a notable subject for photographers, many of whom captured it with the intention of getting their work featured in newspapers and magazines covering the event. The photograph is still protected under the PD-US-expired copyright license, as it was originally published in 1924. Greg Henderson (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Greghenderson2006: If it was published in 1924 as you mention, then it is NOT protected anymore. I suppose that is what you mean. Yann (talk) 16:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann, I believe Rlandmann makes a valid point with COM:ONUS. Please provide some reliable sources supporting the claim photos being considered "published" once they leave the photographers' possession. Graywalls (talk) 16:43, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's what we have been doing for the past 20 years. We can't change a long accepted practice for no reason. So for old pictures, specially pre-1929 US images, the COM:ONUS is on the person requesting deletion. Yann (talk) 17:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained" Graywalls (talk) 17:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You quote only part of the policy (the part which suits your claim). There needs to be significant doubt for deletion. For a 1924 picture to be still under a copyright, 1. it should not have been published before 1929; 2. if published before 1964, it should have a copyright notice and a copyright renewal; 3. if published between 1964 and 1977, it should have a copyright notice; 4. if published between 1978 and 1989, it should have a copyright notice, or a subsequent registration within 5 years. That's a lot of IFs. Yann (talk) 21:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if there is more than theoretical doubt. You can put publication doubts, or lots of other theoretical doubts, on lots of old works. We don't have to be absolutely 100% certain (that is almost frankly never possible). Most works were made to be published. However, when there is some indication that a work really may have lasted a long time without being published, as I think was done here, the publication question needs more scrutiny and better evidence. It may well have been published long before then, but we probably need to actually find that. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:29, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Greghenderson2006 Enlighten us on what exactly you mean by ""protected under the PD-US-expired copyright license". Do you understand "PD" stands for public domain? "protected" and "public domain" don't go together. If this photo is truly in public domain, which is unlikely, the estate of Josselyn, Pat Hathaway Collection, or the Monterey County Historical Society (which appears you might have a COI with) have absolutely no copyright whatsoever. In the 2022 Monterey Herald piece, it says "“The collection is just particularly unique,” said Tim Thomas, local historian and longtime friend of Hathaway. “There are some local photographs that no one has ever seen before. It’s incredibly important to Monterey County local history." " which is an indication that it can not be published until 2034 (70 years after Josselyn's death). I also don't understand why you've linked to the historical society's PRODUCT PURCHASING WEBSITE where they sell copies of the same photo at exorbitant prices as the source of your uploaded copy of low resolution photo. Graywalls (talk) 16:39, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What I mean is that this photograph is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929. The source I’ve cited clearly states that the photo was circa 1924, well before the 1929 cut-off. I’m unsure why there would be any desire to delete one of the few educational examples of the tanker Frank H. Buck, especially since it was captured by Lewis Josselyn, an early Monterey County photographer, known for his 1920-1930s photographs of area events. Greg Henderson (talk) 17:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo was created in 1924. There's little dispute about that. You've not produced credible proof of publication . Graywalls (talk) 17:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also all the photos on the product buying website has a little watermark, so I'm questioning that website being the actual source. The one on Caviews (without product buying portal) does not have the water print. Graywalls (talk) 17:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at File:Nude (Charis, Santa Monica), by Edward Weston.jpg Edward Weston's (1886–1958) photographs for 1936. Many say, no copyright notice and point to an auction house. Greg Henderson (talk) 17:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The product buying website you linked as a source which is currently actively selling Josselyn photo at exorbitant prices also don't have the version that isn't watermarked. So, why is that site even referenced? Graywalls (talk) 17:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your question. Both websites reference the 1924 photograph for Frank H. Buck. Either can be used. As I said above, the Edward Weston photograph points to an auction house website with the date 1936. If you would like me to update the description and/or source, I would be happy to do so. I think the photo should remain based on the 1924 date, which any copyright would have expired and now be in public domain, unlike photos after the 1929 cut-off date. Greg Henderson (talk) 17:48, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. So far nobody is disputing when the picture was taken. We're talking about photographed vs published. Show documentation when and where it was published, per COM:ONUS. Graywalls (talk) 18:54, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Updated the license from PD-US-expired to PD-US, as it applies to "media files" that are in the public domain in the United States. This adjustment aligns with the Edward Weston file, which has a similar author age context. In Josselyn’s case, the image dates to 1924, further supporting this classification. Greg Henderson (talk) 21:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Greghenderson2006 I missed a reference which says it was published in 1924. If it was indeed published in a newspaper, that would change things. The source website does say it specifically comes from a negative, which was under control of the photographer's family until after his death, and given (or sold) to the owner of the source website's business in 1970. If that is the only publication history we have, that could very well be a photo create in 1924 but not published until much later. Use in a newspaper would be publication (at least of the version seen in that newspaper). But where was that? I only see links to a Fine Art America thing, which I think can sell photos under license, in that case from the Monterey County Historical Society which I think is related to the other archivist -- I think the source for that is the same negative under question. Someone above said there is a "very similar photo" in the The San Francisco Examiner from May 5, 1924, but unless it's this exact photo, that is no help at all. The ship went aground on May 3, 1924; it is unlikely a photo appeared in a newspaper that same day. So... what are some of the details of that? I have seen postcards from other photographers published at the time so there are likely similar images we could use. In this case though, the immediate source came from a negative that did not leave the photographer's possession until after he died -- which raises the very real possibility it was not published anywhere near when it was created. Many photos created in 1924 are fine now, but a few may not be. We have to go by the information we have available on this photo. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:29, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are some local photographs that no one has ever seen before from the 2022 Monterey Herald is a reasonable cause to believe photos are not published without a specific credible indication of individual photos in question having been published with date, name and page of verifiable publication. Having been printed for family/internal use is obviously not publication by US legal definition. Graywalls (talk) 04:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is published if the photographer is not a family member. In 1924, cameras were expensive, and not everybody had a camera. Pictures were usually made by professional photographer for a fee. This whole "not published" claim is not understanding the conditions in which pictures were taken in 1924. Yann (talk) 12:14, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think it's strictly a family member -- it can be a judgement call which means there is lots of gray area. Just a couple of close friends, probably not. With a professional photographer and a work made on commission, you get into other areas which were ruled both ways -- either the commissioning party owns the copyright (which can remain unpublished), or it was a sale of copies, meaning the photographer would retain copyright but they needed a notice as they would be published (I tend to think the latter is likely enough to assume for studio photos, though would not remove a "heirs" license which would come from a commissioned-ownership claim). When it's from a negative though, that opens up a lot more questions. The negative itself remained in possession of the photographer their entire life. Maybe he took more than one view, and only published other versions at the time. Or maybe it was a hobbyist photographer who did not publish anything. Or worked for someone else as a photographer, so had the know-how and equipment, and made other photos on his own time for himself, which only came to light after he died. Or maybe they only published a crop, meaning there are unpublished portions of the negative (this was pretty common). Those possibilities move this more into the "significant doubt" area for me. There were certainly other photos of the incident published at the time, but was this one? I do think we need to find an actual publication of this photo. I tend to make the same arguments when it comes from the Bassano archives -- ones from negatives may have been unpublished, but the ones from prints show they were published at the time. (That archive does have examples of a series of negatives taken but only some chosen for publication.). Someone buying an archive along with any remaining copyrights may not have any idea which were actually published so would put a copyright claim on all of them, but we need to prove that wrong beyond a significant doubt. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tuas dispute.png

This is a reupload of File:Tuas maritime dispute.png posing as an original file by a known sock farm with previous copyright issues. It has some small edits that for some reason make it less useful for the topic at hand, as it removes the coastline from which some of the maritime claim lines shown are derived. CMD (talk) 17:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Продукция Марс.JPG

per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 11:51, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Below TOO, copyrighted parts DM Natuur12 (talk) 21:37, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Продукция Марс.JPG

COM:PACKAGE. The wrapper has an image of nuts which are not de minimus; wrapper is above TOO US. We have a license for the derivative work, but we also need a license for the packaging. Glrx (talk) 17:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete peer nomination AbchyZa22 (talk) 21:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Furaki98 (talk · contribs)

Source is Facebook.

Günther Frager (talk) 17:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Snickers Almond (8587030482).jpg

COM:PACKAGE. The wrapper has an image of nuts which are not de minimis; wrapper is above TOO US. We have a license for the derivative work, but we also need a license for the packaging. Glrx (talk) 17:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete peer nom. AbchyZa22 (talk) 18:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What makes you think that it is above TOO US? The threshold of originality is very generous in the US (unlike the UK). The almond on the wrapper is hardly visible because the text logo takes up like 90-95% of the wrapper. It's de minimis. Nakonana (talk) 00:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think Nakonana is the only wise guy here. I wonder how the others find something copyrightable on that package... KEEP! 186.175.6.104 01:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The pictures of almonds probably make this above COM:TOO US. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Niños Sordos en Chile.pdf

Article written by the uploader and without historical importance.Not in COM:SCOPE. Günther Frager (talk) 17:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Bolivarflores90

Items include the wrong information Bolivarflores90 (talk) 18:00, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no useful content, no warnings, safe to delete. Taylor 49 (talk) 18:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep no need to delete, useless request. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reverend Bolivar Flores.jpg

This item have the wrong information post. 50.213.82.229 17:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article have the wrong information Bolivarflores90 (talk) 18:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Uploader's req (6+1/2 years later) ... not notable. Taylor 49 (talk) 18:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mauzac 24 église vitrail (1).jpg

doublon avec File:Mauzac (24) église vitrail choeur détail.jpg Père Igor (talk) 18:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mecca possil.jpg

Appears to be taken from http://www.scottishcinemas.org.uk/scotland/mckissack/4.html, though it could be out of copyright Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Andrewjohnmoore (talk · contribs)

Appears to be taken from https://cinematreasures.org/theaters/50796

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Credited to HUCKLEBERRYKING MEDIA GMBH Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anton Repnik, Kovači (1980).jpg

COM:COPYVIO; the author died in 2020, no evidence of permission by the current copyright owner. — Yerpo ^Eh? 20:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:3lídio.jpg

Não é um conteúdo adequado para a população, de acordo com o autor da obra. Elídio Hatutale (talk) 20:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inuvialuit flag

Copyright violations. Official flags in Canada are by default copyrighted for 50 years (https://copyright.ubc.ca/public-domain/) and the Inuvialuit flag was made in 1984 by the Government of Canada (https://www.fotw.info/flags/ca_inuv.html). The Inuvialuit do appear to allow noncommercial use of their flag (https://irc.inuvialuit.com/terms-of-use/) but this is not enough for inclusion on Commons. There is also a plagiarism issue here: both uploaders claim to be the "author" of the flag when uploading. Simply digitizing or making an SVG version of a flag does not confer authorship under Canadian law. Neither User:Sprucecopse nor User:Telebeam have the rights to be releasing the image into the public domain and PD-self is inappropriate. -- Intervex (talk) 20:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can't the .svg file just be marked with a copyright notice? Vector files of copyrighted flags are okay to my understanding, but I can upload a smaller version of the .svg file and upload it to English Wikipedia as a non-free file instead if that's ok with you. Sprucecopse (talk) 14:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but that's not how Canadian copyright law works (see COM:CANADA as well as that UBC link I posted earlier.) Copyright of an artistic work means protection from people copying or reproducing the artistic work. An SVG reproduction of a copyrighted flag is still a copyright violation, because it is a reproduction. The file format doesn't matter, the visual likeness is what matters.

It's worth remembering that Commons and Wikipedia have different standards about what images can be uploaded. Commons is strict: images *must* have a free license (Commons:Project_scope#Must_be_freely_licensed_or_public_doma). Wikipedia allows for fair use & fair dealing under certain circumstances (Commons:Fair use, see relevant Wikiproject for their policies).

The good news is that I think it should be straightforward to justify uploading the flag to Wikipedia on the basis of fair dealing (w:Fair dealing in Canadian copyright law). It's a really pretty flag and I'm fond of it myself.

I'd recommend that it get transferred over to Wikipedia. See w:Wikipedia:Non-free content to get started. Best, Intervex (talk) 05:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Charlotte Downs and Ben Marshall.jpg

No user here 186.172.78.209 01:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: user photo in use on en:W. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charlotte Downs and Ben Marshall.jpg

Self promotion on English Wikipedia user page 186.175.168.104 21:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You'd probably have better luck using the rationale "personal image of non-contributor" (though I'd say it makes a nice stockphoto). Nakonana (talk) 00:32, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Farhadnobakhtkolor (talk · contribs)

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 21:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete F10, personal photos. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nikesh Ram-.jpg

The user's other upload (File:NikeshRam.jpg) was taken from a Khaleej Times cover without permission. This file is also a professional photo marked as "own work," with metadata very similar to the other file. I haven't found it anywhere else online, but it seems too suspicious to ignore. Sinigh (talk) 21:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fernando (4259951524).jpg

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fibercom broschuere Deutsch.pdf

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fiirefox Extended Release.png

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flora MartínezPorBreinnerParrado.jpg

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 21:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not own work. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Patoleharshad (talk · contribs)

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 21:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foreign affairs.jpg

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by AntonioOrtizL (talk · contribs)

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 21:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foto da Isis. Presente. Ramon.jpg

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete F10, personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foto Coimbra.jpg

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete F10, personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Fabiopestanabezerra (talk · contribs)

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 21:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foto Dott Taurozzi.jpg

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foto Guto Ajayu retrato.jpg

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diseño 1 Puente Ferroviario Metro Cúcuta Línea 1.png

Archivo: Diseño 1 Puente Ferroviario Metro Cúcuta Línea 1.png Cnortedesantander08 (talk) 21:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Eunika B (talk · contribs)

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 21:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete F10, personal photos. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foto wkp.jpg

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete F10, personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nitaskinan flag.png

Copyright violation. Flags in Canada are by default copyrighted. Precedent from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:SVG flags of cities of Canada is this is above Threshold of Originality. The Atikamekw flag was made by Jacques Newashish thirty years ago (https://ici.radio-canada.ca/espaces-autochtones/1975034/drapeaux-autochtones-symbole-etendard) and there is no evidence it has a free license. Intervex (talk) 22:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Francesco Vecchio.jpg

out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Như Quỳnh

The main image was uploaded on 21 October 2022 without EXIF data by Canhnn. The photo depicts Hoàng Ngân Ánh (left, not notable according to this DR) and Như Quỳnh. This is the only upload of that user who tried to create an article for Hoàng Ngân Ánh at vi:wp which failed. The very same image can be found at this webpage (direct link to image) but this was published in March 2023 after the upload in October 2022. This could be a copyvio on base of an earlier publication of the very same image which is now gone or not found by Google or Tineye. For me a copyvio appears more likely as the EXIF data are missing and as the last sentence on the page indicates that the pictures were shared by Hoàng Ngân Ánh. Another possiblity is that all these are attempts of self-promotion. But then we would still need to verify that the photographer has granted the necessary rights for a publication under CC-BY-SA license. In this case we would need this to be processed through COM:VRT. The other photos are derivatives.

AFBorchert (talk) 23:02, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just notice that Canhnn uploaded also File:Hoang-Ngan-Anh.jpg on 21 October 2022 which was deleted. That picture has been taken in the same setting as this one or this one but is not identical to them. They appear to have been created by some professional photographer. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zarząd BZPN.jpg

This file was initially tagged by BZPN2 as Speedy (QD) and the most recent rationale was: Author's request - I don't want this photo to be on Commons. BZPN2 (talk) 20:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC) Not eligible for G7, so opening DR. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, I want this file deleted. It is my own work and I do not want it to be available on Commons any longer. BZPN (talk) 06:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohamedmediene.jpg

Already on the internet in 2020 according to TinEye, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frederick Omoyoma Odorige.jpg

out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete F10, personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JokerJankowski.jpg

out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete F10, personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:علي عيسوي.jpg

out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete F10, personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ayanne.jpg

Le fichier est en double Jcthehyraud (talk) 23:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Aamir Kashmiri Al Maqdisi (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: self-made, probably AI-generated "coat of arms" of a small village (which doesn't even spell the name of the village consistently).

Omphalographer (talk) 23:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Aamir Kashmiri Al Maqdisi (talk · contribs)

Copyvio: these logos are all well above the threshold of originality, and I doubt very much that the uploader created all of them. Source and licensing information is needed.

Omphalographer (talk) 23:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by RašaSaSalaša (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: fake AI-generated images of protests. Uploader is globally locked for vandalism.

Omphalographer (talk) 23:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bakkkkyyyy.webp

Out of scope: AI-generated image of a robot, now unused; was used in a likely hoax edit on enwiki which I've reverted (en:Special:Diff/1258418950). Omphalographer (talk) 23:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SOLUTIONsa.webp

Out of scope: unused AI-generated "logo" with nonsense text ("Solutiona - Sogpry here"). Omphalographer (talk) 23:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:3 DSW Wikipedia own work.png

no own work 2003:E5:FF2C:1540:9944:22C5:3307:FC40 17:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is my own work. T7t7t7 (talk) 15:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reverend Bolívar Flores.jpg

This item have the wrong information post. 50.213.82.229 17:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sun Outage - DSC 6720.JPG

Unacceptable derivative work of a monitor. ✗plicit 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep De-minimis --Sreejith K (talk) 02:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with this as the main subject is the message displayed on the TV Atomicdragon136 (talk) 03:42, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, what do you mean by deletion request? I took my own images of a TV with a message saying the sun outage. Do you mean now we can't just took images of a TV anymore? How am I supposed to tell people what sun outage looks like on their TV? AlphaAdhito (talk) 03:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Copyrighted transmission. --Krd 03:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]