Commons:Bots/Requests/BOT-Twm Crys

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Operator: Llywelyn2000 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought:

Add one template to around 100 images uploaded by User:Llywelyn2000, in the Category:Llandaff Cathedral - interior.

Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run):

Automatic

Maximum edit rate (e.g. edits per minute):

One / 10 seconds

Bot flag requested: (Y/N): Y

Programming language(s): AWB

Llywelyn2000 (talk) 11:05, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

I don't thin there is a botflag needed for just ~100 edits. The main account can be used. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:19, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
EugeneZelenko If you are requesting a test run, please give access at Commons:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage. Riley Huntley (talk) 14:30, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@EugeneZelenko: You want approve a bot for 100 edits? Seriously? --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:35, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Edit conflict) There is not enough here for a bot task, editing 100 images does not warrant going through the BRFA process. Operator can makes these edits themselves using AWB, VFC or various other tools on their main account. User can also request a bot to do it at Commons:Bots/Work requests. Bot userpage contains a redirect to another wiki in, local bot policy requests you "make sure you have listed all information before requesting bot permission." If this task very well warrants a bot, please expand the description of the task by specifically stating which template you wish to add to these pages and include a manual example (diff). Riley Huntley (talk) 14:30, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Strong oppose per Riley, low amount of edits, for own ends only. Suggest speedy decline. --Krd 14:44, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Strong oppose per Riley. -- Poké95 02:17, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Come on people. The 100 edits will hopefully be the first of many edits of this (for us new) bot operator. Bot has over 100.000 edits in another wiki so I'm sure by now Llywelyn2000 knows how to run a bot. No need to be overly bureaucratic here. Multichill (talk) 16:36, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • If the bot operator wishes for this task to be approved, they should folow my recommendations and further explain the task (which template and an example diff). In addition, they should run the bot trial before you support. ~riley (talk) 20:07, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Strong oppose a botflag for 100 edits is not needed at all. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just a reminder that this is the discussion section, not the vote section. For those of you wanting to drop votes, please go to the ongoing RfA (coincidentally mine, not canvassing, feel free to oppose). Otherwise, let's stick to useful comments and let the 'crats handle this. <!-- This is not a vote. It is a discussion --> is below the section header for a reason. ~riley (talk) 20:07, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Then I'll do it by hand. Thanks. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 05:06, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Llywelyn2000: If you are withdrawing your BRFA, please state so. You can request AWB access be transferred to your main account at Commons:Requests for rights#AutoWikiBrowser access as well, if interested. ~riley (talk) 18:59, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. --Krd 14:10, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]