Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive 7

Miguelmerida

Resolved

• User: Miguelmerida (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Vandalism, multiple uploads which were out of scope or copyvios, use of a second account (Miguel Angel Lopez Merida (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user)

Indeedous (talk) 10:39, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

 Done Migue Angel López Merida, Miguel Angel Lopez Merida, and Miguelmerida blocked. INeverCry 17:07, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

88.131.31.186

Resolved

• User: 88.131.31.186 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Repeated attack against a user at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Barnard 33.jpg

Jee 15:18, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

• Reported here as well. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 15:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

 Done. See AN/B. --Alan ^(talk) 15:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Jee 15:40, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

109.3.192.42

Persistent vandal. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 15:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

 Done by Natuur12 --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:49, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

108.169.0.223

Came from somewhere, not nowhere. Obviously he has something against Russavia. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 07:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

 Done. --A.Savin 07:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

91.38.26.240 (talk · contribs)

17 times vandalism this morning on file:Steck.jpg about 'Hitler and penisses' (and things like that) - Richardkw (talk) 12:43, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Victory is mine again

• User: Victory is mine again (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: This account, and several like it, are banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki. He is an amateur filmmaker who has been very persistent in trying to post articles about himself and his films. I have tagged all his images for deletion, but he continues to post them to en.wiki while the deletion period is pending. Could someone delete all the images that I have tagged in the last few days, and block those accounts? Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 14:45, 31 March 2014 (UTC) (admin, en.wiki)

NawlinWiki (talk) 14:45, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

 Done Uploads nuked, user blocked (indef) --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 14:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Would you mind doing the same for User:LesleybexsCarter and his images? NawlinWiki (talk) 15:31, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

 Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

198.110.174.175

Resolved

• User: 198.110.174.175 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Privacy / vandalism on File:Acacia cultriformis leaves.jpg. Richardkw (talk) 14:15, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

On NL-Wikipedia it is possible that a moderator hides names and things like that. Is that possible on Commons aswell? (see the file above) - Kind regards, - Richardkw (talk) 14:15, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

 Done by Elcobbola --Alan ^(talk) 14:25, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

XxElsanxx

Resolved

• User: XxElsanxx (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: notoric copy vio - user blocked for this reason at deWP [1] and see his talk page at commons.

Codc (talk) 13:58, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Kchs

• User: Kchs (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting:

Kchs (talk · contribs), likely a sockpuppet of Ckvin2u (talk · contribs), uploads a copyvio after noticing the same image has been deleted as a copyvio. That's intentionally violating an important Commons policy (after warnings) and should not be tolerated.    FDMS  4    15:07, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

 Done Uploads nuked, User blocked indef. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 18:38, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

94.153.10.122 (talk · contribs)

Resolved

spambot, see also [2] /St1995 20:41, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Tegel globally blocked 94.153.10.122 (expires 20:15, 4 May 2014) with the following comment: Cross-wiki spam: spambot. --Alan ^(talk) 20:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Carlosrycbar

Resolved

• User: Carlosrycbar (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Several copyvios; last warning by Túrelio on 2014-04-04; uploaded this copyvio today.

ireas (talk) 10:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

 Done - file deleted and user blocked for 1 week. JurgenNL (talk) 11:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

108.210.154.192

108.210.154.192 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user - unconstructive/test edits; warned. /St1995 14:05, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

78.94.133.60

78.94.133.60 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user - repeatedly nonsense and piggish Edits --Trzęsacz (talk) 11:33, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

65.254.225.129

Resolved

65.254.225.129 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user Spambot (see also deleted contributions) /St1995 19:41, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Originally indef blocked by Hedwig in Washington (talk • contribs • blocks • protections • deletions • moves • rights • rights changes), and I changed block duration to a year, as we usually don't indef IPs. — Revi_complaint? 08:23, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

211.30.211.14

211.30.211.14 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user - vandalism /St1995 21:38, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

 Done. --A.Savin 21:41, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

108.210.154.192

108.210.154.192 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user - vandalism-only IP /St1995 21:17, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

 Done. --A.Savin 21:24, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

5.149.212.198

5.149.212.198 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user - spambot, previously blocked /St1995 18:12, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 18:21, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Sexdealer

Resolved

• User: Sexdealer (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: May be a vandalism-only account. See this.

— Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 04:36, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

 Done. --A.Savin 06:00, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

186.108.173.106

Resolved

• User: 186.108.173.106 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: May be a vandalism-only account. See this [3]. Suspected sockpuppet see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Retaux.

Maxxl2 - talk 15:14, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Blocked --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:05, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

User:Mohammad Muaaz Bin Zaka

removes speedy deletion tag and deleted deletion request--Motopark (talk) 14:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Are you sure you have the correct user? Mohammad Muaaz Bin Zaka hasn't edited since 2011. Эlcobbola _talk 14:47, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Correct right user user:Muhammad Muaaz Bin Zaka--Motopark (talk) 14:52, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

I don't think action is required. You're nominating his user page, which seems perfectly in scope to me, for deletion. Removing a notice from a file nominated for deletion is problematic because potential reusers of the file won't receive a warning, but here there's no real harm, especially since the deletion request is unscathed. Эlcobbola _talk 16:02, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

@Elcobbola: Userpage spam is not in scope. page deleted + user blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:25, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

@Steinsplitter Indeed, but that's not what this was. You'll also be deleting several admin user pages, then? Эlcobbola _talk 16:36, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:14, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

VÁNDALC0CK

Resolved

• User: VÁNDALC0CK (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Did some minor disruption, but appears to be a vandalism-only account and a sockpuppet of Badfaithvándal who also vandalized the Village Pump twice and is now blocked. — SMUconlaw (talk) 17:40, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Locked globally. Socks as well. Glaisher (talk) 17:42, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

 Done globally by stewards. Alan ^(talk) 18:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

紫菜汤圆

Pending

• User: 紫菜汤圆 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Almost all the uploads of this user are copyvios.

Siyuwj (talk) 13:09, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

 Done All files deleted. User warned. Yann (talk) 13:30, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

User:Andyt32

 Done User warned, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 13:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Resolved

• User: Andyt32 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Please block and nuke.    FDMS  4    13:23, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Could somebody add the above template as a preload to the edit link of {{Administrators' noticeboard}}?    FDMS  4    13:25, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Again Copyright violations: User blocked --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:48, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

2602:306:CD29:AC00:1133:4ED4:B728:26B4

Resolved

• User: 2602:306:CD29:AC00:1133:4ED4:B728:26B4 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Numerous nonsense DRs & CfDs, similar to a few made by 98.16.200.38 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user a couple of weeks ago

—Odysseus1479 (talk) 04:56, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

decided all nonsense DRs as keep. Because it too late now it makes no sense to block this (dynamic) IP now. --JuTa 05:17, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

C-perspect-bur4

C-perspect-bur4 (talk · contribs) is uploading files with nonsensical names, nonsensical descriptions and at best categorizes them in nonsensical categories. Files are not used. This seems like vandalism. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:29, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

 Done I will delete all his/her uploads and warn him/her. Taivo (talk) 07:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

188.25.156.132

188.25.156.132 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user - vandal\spambot /St1995 20:55, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:59, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Dkankeriffic

Resolved

• User: Dkankeriffic (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Uploading copyrighted pornographic images for vandalism use at the English Wikipedia

~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 18:13, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Blocked --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:29, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

AdityaNofrianda

• User: AdityaNofrianda (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Keeps on uploading copyvio despite multiple warnings.

BrightRaven (talk) 09:31, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 04:28, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Biatorb

Hi. I just examined edits of User:Biatorb which appear to be purely disruptive: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Biatorb

In page "Old maps of Vojvodina" this user removed relevant category "Old maps of Serbia": [4]. After this edit was reverted by me, Biatorb removed it again: [5]. And again after I asked for explanation on talk page: [6]. As you can see there is only my comment on talk page but no answer from Biatorb: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Old_maps_of_Vojvodina

However, after examining edits of this user, I noticed a long term disruption in several pages, such are these:

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maramures_Josephinische_Landesaufnahme_1782-1785_Background.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Harta_Iozefina_a_Banatului_background_1769-72.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BihorSolnocCrasnaCountyJosephinischeLandesaufnahme.jpg

It appears that this user is involved in long term revert-warring over these same pages in long time period, just check page histories and diffs of user Biatorb there:

• [7]
• [8]

For some, reason, Biatorb here continuosly removing category "Old maps of Romania" since February 2013: [9].

See same edit in August 2013: [10]

Same in May 2014: [11].

As I counted, Biatorb edited that page as many as 46 times, always removing category "Old maps of Romania" from it. Biatorb obviously battling there his revert war with few other users, but as this map shows part of present-day Romania, category "Old maps of Romania" is relevant for it: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maramures_Josephinische_Landesaufnahme_1782-1785_Background.jpg

Thus, edits of user Biatorb appear to be pure vandalism. PANONIAN (talk) 18:29, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

 blocked and protected Maps protected, User blocked for one month (only). Next time infinite. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 21:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Chicareli

Resolved

• User: Chicareli (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Special:Contributions/Chicareli

Jee 09:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:59, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

User vandalizing maps of Serbia

Pending

• User: Nikswerdhond (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: This user is constantly vandalizing maps of Serbia, and according to list of contributions that user's only activity on Wikipedia. User is changing maps to show Kosovo as independent state even though Kosovo is not a member of the United Nations. Nobody can insist that Kosovo is represented as independent state since there are many self-proclaimed states and it would a complete chaos on Wikipedia if their supporters would be allowed to update existing maps in this way. Updating new maps can be tolerated up to some point, but changing existing maps is absolutely unacceptable. This user definitely needs to prevented from making any further changes on Wikipedia. Tresnjevo (talk) 10:26, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

• • Welcome to the reality, I reverted YOUR changes were appropriate. Don't start this edit-warring again, this was deemed settled some months ago. --Denniss (talk) 16:33, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

ːːIf you want to have maps of serbia that you find "reality", upload new ones, Deniss, do not edit war with vandals. Otherwise, you are vandalising same as this user above, as that is not vikipedia rules. Those maps was changed all over the vikipedia, that is not normal, that is vandal. Create new maps, and other vikipedias will use them, if they want. --Anastan (talk) 22:00, 5 May 2014 (UTC) ːːWhere was this "deemed settled"? Post here that for us to see. I have understood that original image cannot be chenged here, and that new must be send to use here. --Anastan (talk) 22:10, 5 May 2014 (UTC) ːːːI talked with people, and now i know you do not can replace this images, Denis. Commons:OVERWRITE If another editor thinks that a change is not an improvement (even if the editor making the change thinks it minor), the change can be reverted. Once a change has been reverted, the new image should be uploaded under a new filename (unless the reverting editor explicitly or implicitly agrees to the contested change). A big number of peoples reverted yur edits, so you cannot edit it anymore! --Anastan (talk) 22:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Denniss, now you are informed about official guideline about overwriting files. Next time you revert any of these images, you will be reported for vandalism as well. Tresnjevo (talk) 05:50, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Blablurb and threaths, you really need to enter the real word. If you continue to overwrite maps with your fantasy version I'll lock these images. Many images already have alternative (Serb fantasy) versions. Please tell me if there's one missing and I may split it from the existing old ones.--Denniss (talk) 05:57, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Please visit Google maps and tell me if you can see Abkhazia as independent state? No, you cannot see it even though it's de facto independent, and in matter of fact much more independent than Kosovo. Reason for this is that Abkhazia is not member of UN. Period. If you want to create new map for Albanian Wikipedia where Paris is part of Albania, just go ahead and do it. But you cannot promote your nationalist views on maps that other users created. Once again, you are warned (nobody is threatening here) about consequences if you repeat the same thing again. Tresnjevo (talk) 06:34, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

FYI:

• w:en:International recognition of Kosovo
• w:en:International recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia

Whether Google Maps indicates that a country exists or not can only be additional evidence. Disputed is disputed and has to be treated on Commons as such. Therefore adding Kosovo, Abkhazia, and South Ossetia as such is common sense and a necessity to provide accurate information / maps. This doesn't sanction an edit war. The logical conclusion would be to create two versions: One where the disputed part is indicated as part of another country, and one where it is not. If there's a problem with an admin, one can always file a complaint here. What shall it be? --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 04:22, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Its interesting how none see the problem. We all agree that Kosovo should have ther maps, but Serbia must have them also. So, i will now restore original maps, and all of you are welcome to create new ones with not kosovo situation. Original maps, that are in use all over will stay as they are, and new ones can be uploaded. And i would love to see who will block me for respecting Commons:OVERWRITE!! --Anastan (talk) 11:15, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

2A02:810D:10C0:6F4:6D77:439C:D035:B13A

Resolved

• User: 2A02:810D:10C0:6F4:6D77:439C:D035:B13A (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Vandalims in User talk:Steinsplitter.

Steindy (talk) 18:05, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Steindy, du hast beim Wiederherstellen deines Beitrages einen fremden Beitrag überschrieben. Deswegen hat die IP – meiner Meinung nach zurecht – revertiert. // Steindy, you deleted an other post while restoring/adding your post. That’s why the anonymous user reverted your edits (justified, in my opinion). — ireas (talk) 18:11, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Bullshit. It is vandalism by User:Steindy who is deleting other users' messages as those by Artbuero, Steinsplitter, Victor Lledo, Prosfilaes and Baronfuzz. --2A02:810D:10C0:6F4:6D77:439C:D035:B13A 18:14, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Closed. No vandalism by the IP. --A.Savin 18:16, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Endcunda

Resolved

• User: Endcunda (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: User continues to remove {{Information}} templates and warnings from his talkpage, already warned with uw-v2 twice.    FDMS  4    12:21, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

 Done 3 days. Please extend it if you think more block is appropriate. — Revi_complaint? 12:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

User:Mr Wiki Pro

Resolved

• User: Mr Wiki Pro (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: User continues to remove categories
• Examplesː17:44, 21 May 2014 (diff | hist) . . (-31)‎ . . File:Ehrengrab Elisabeth Selbert (Friedhof Niederzwehren).jpg ‎ (Undo revision 124527300 by 91.65.49.45 (talk)) (current)
• 17:43, 21 May 2014 (diff | hist) . . (-38)‎ . . File:Elisabeth Selbert (timbre RFA).jpg ‎ (Undo revision 124526806 by 91.65.49.45 (talk) Category does not exist yet) (current)
• 17:42, 21 May 2014 (diff | hist) . . (-30)‎ . . File:DBP 1987 1338 Elisabeth Selbert.jpg ‎ (Undo revision 124526867 by 91.65.49.45 (talk) Category does not exist yet) (current)
• 17:42, 21 May 2014 (diff | hist) . . (-31)‎ . . File:Frauen 120 Pf Elisabeth Selbert.png ‎ (Undo revision 124526895 by 91.65.49.45 (talk) Category does not exist yet) (current)
• 17:41, 21 May 2014 (diff | hist) . . (-31)‎ . . File:Ehrengrab Elisabeth Selbert (Friedhof Niederzwehren).jpg ‎ (Undo revision 124527116 by 91.65.49.45 (talk) Category does not exist yet)
• 17:40, 21 May 2014 (diff | hist) . . (-31)‎ . . File:Väter Mütter des Grundgesetzes.png ‎ (Undo revision 124527065 by 91.65.49.45 (talk) Category does not yet exist) (current)
• 17:38, 21 May 2014 (diff | hist) . . (-31)‎ . . File:Elisabethselbertgesamtschule.jpg ‎ (Undo revision 124526946 by 91.65.49.45 (talk) Category does not yet exist) (current)
• Reported by 91.65.49.45 18:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

This is a stupid bad faith report. The IP was adding non existent category to articles and I was removing them because we dont want loads of red link categorys!--Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 18:17, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

I count 7 vandal actions. Is that not enough to report you? And who should repair your damages if not you? 91.65.49.45 19:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

"Vandal actions" that's a stupid thing to say. It me who spent ages clearing up the crap you left around. It's just a complete waste of my time!--Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 20:18, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

The two of you should get a nice little break from Commons for edit warring. A simple question would have done it.

Q: Are you going to create the categories?

A: Yes or No

Simple as pie. But noooo, you guys feel better wasting our time and butt heads. If any of you appear here again with something like this there will be consequences. Grow up and talk to each other! Dear IP: PLEASE! Next time create the categories first.

 Categories replaced, no admin-action needed (yet) --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 20:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

The vandal has claimed, that red links/categories are not allowed. Is that true? 91.65.49.45 20:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

What good would a red link do? And for calling the other user a vandal you get a little Commons break to calm down. Drink a cup of tea and figure out how to behave her properly. You may want to get a little stash of teabags since you'll pause for a week now.

 Now admin action needed, IP blocked for a week for harassment and obvious lack of tea --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 20:41, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Sexy turds

Resolved

• User: Sexy turds (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Uploads are for harassment only

Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:21, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

•  Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:13, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

220.235.129.22

Resolved

• User: 220.235.129.22 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Deletion troll: [12]

Mariofan13 (talk) 06:57, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

200.96.57.12

Resolved

• User: 200.96.57.12 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Offensive comment after his lock on pt-wiki.

Biólogo 32 ^What? 21:18, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Done, blocked. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 21:59, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Antony Kiriakoglou

Resolved

• User: Antony Kiriakoglou (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Keeps on uploading copyvio pictures, despite warnings. He was already blocked once.

BrightRaven (talk) 09:54, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Blocked --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:00, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Commons_fair_use_upload_bot

Resolved

• User: Commons_fair_use_upload_bot (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: abuse of speedy delete tags with minor reasons as "fair upload" disrupting articles and pictures global inuse. An "unfair upload" may be a reason for deletion, but not without informing users and without discussing the problem.

Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 06:10, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

The mayor problem is the missing discussion an documentation of removed pictures. --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 06:11, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

No idea what you see as a problem. I (and probably other admin colleagues and users) automatically "invoke" this bot by tagging files with {{Fair use delete}}. I do this for files on Commons which are currently in use on :en Wikipedia, but have been requested for deletion due to copyright/licensing problems. I.e., the files would be deleted from Commons anyway. --Túrelio (talk) 06:42, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Well, these pictures have been in use for long time without any probs. If there in use on EN:WP maybe one issue how the files are handled by commons to make it other projects avail. But the issue is even larger. What if pictures from commons were found in the web without reference. This would change the owner and donator of the picture to a violator of copyright if the external use does not give a reference to commons. A deletion requires to have a discussion log to make the process visible for the owners. --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 07:09, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

"for long time" - no, this is not generally true, as the history of the files and the reasons for deletion are quite variable. Though I may repeat myself, these are two rather separate issues: this concerns only files which would be deleted from Commons anyway, because they violate our licensing policy. Whether this is performed via a speedy-deletion or a regular (slow) deletion-request depends on the circumstances (and a bit on the nominator). A blatant or clear copyvio is of course speedy-deleted, even if it has been in use on a project or remained on Commons for some time — thanks to our efforts at recent-upload patroling, this happens not so often. Besides, the deletion-logs are preseved anyway, though for the speedy-deletions they are less visible.

The fair-use-to-:en process is just a service for a subgroup of the above mentioned files which are is use on :en. Of course, if other projects have a similar broad fair-use policy as :en, they might also install a similar process, which would then need to be integrated in our processes. --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

It looks like there's no vandal on this bot. Please contact bot operator if you need bot fix. PS, Image was on Commons without problem != image has no problem. — Revi_complaint? 03:56, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Asiancock

Resolved

• User: Asiancock (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Single Purpose User, abusing commons as porn website of his own dick, inappropriate user name (or appropriate for his sole mission here). --Yikrazuul (talk) 15:03, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
  • I wiped the uploads. I'm not sure whether or not to block the uploader; clearly they're here for the wrong reason, but I'm not a fan of blocking without warnings. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:37, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
    • Suggest him username change? And block if he ignores? Ankry (talk) 20:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
      • Should we blacklist accountcreation for usernames containing "cock"? --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:54, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
        • It would be too far. Ankry (talk) 20:59, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
          • Bad idea. I agree. Example: User:Joe Cocker. --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:02, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Blocked for username. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:38, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Nazeem Hari Suriya

• User: Nazeem Hari Suriya (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Strange behaviour in deletion requests, obviously contributing images which are not useful (he should use facebook or flickR). --Yikrazuul (talk) 21:46, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

• disappointed, user with no wiki experience and communication problems. I see no reason for any action if no further problem with the user appear. Ankry (talk) 07:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Mr Wiki Pro

Resolved

• User: Mr Wiki Pro (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Keeps adding offending lyrics at http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=TimedText:United_States_Navy_Band_-_Maamme.ogg.en.srt&action=history.

82.141.126.126 19:05, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Actually if the IP bothered to read the message i left on his talk page and the edit summaries he would know I have nominated the page for deletion (see Commons:Deletion requests/TimedText:United States Navy Band - Maamme.ogg.en.srt--Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 19:08, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Page deleted --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Alvesgaspar

Resolved

• User: Alvesgaspar (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: He ascribed vandalism to me. I didn't vandalize the page, I just nominated two of my images. Look my talk page: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mariofan13#Plese_stopo_vandalizing

Mariofan13 (talk) 19:50, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

 Mariofan13: Check your edits first and don't spam the AN board with nonsense. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 21:15, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

93.50.115.250

Resolved

• User: 93.50.115.250 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: User:Pava is edit-warring under IP. User has been abusing multiple accounts/IPs (including a related IP) in the past (see his block log here) and the CU

Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 14:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

 blocked (1 week) Do we need to add a CU? I blocked Pava indef for edit warring after warnings (not the first time), copyvios, and abusing multiple accounts. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 04:01, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

I ran a CU and did not identify any sleeper accounts. Эlcobbola _talk 14:23, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

OK. Done for now. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 20:54, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

SALTI FAN

Resolved

• User: SALTI FAN (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: User were uploaded files only for vandalical purposes (including copyvio), affecting an article at es:Wikipedia. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Amitie 10g (talk) 19:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Uploads deleted and user warned. The user has not continued to upload files, so I am not blocking at this time. User should be blocked if uploads resume. Эlcobbola _talk 20:42, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Futbase

Pending

• User: Futbase (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: This user does not stop to remove the logos of football shirts for no reason. I Reverté once then I put a message but it will not stop. I post therefore this claim to end the problem. Gustavo neto and Zotteteen1 are witnesses.

Principal adjoint (talk) 10:05, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

User blocked. Ankry (talk) 10:15, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

@Principal adjoint: A consensus about images edited by Futbase is required. Can you point any? Ankry (talk) 11:03, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

The files changed already exist for most version without logo. Principal adjoint (talk) 11:09, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

178.183.135.65

Resolved

• User: 178.183.135.65 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Inserts curses and removes adequate categories from pictures.

Abderitestatos (talk) 09:37, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Blocked one week. --Krd 09:44, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

AlvaFereday

Resolved

• User: AlvaFereday (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Cross-wiki spambot. Block and deletion required. Thanks.

—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 17:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Blocked --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:51, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Cvbnapple

Resolved

• User: Cvbnapple (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: After the nomination to deletion of one of his images this user seems to think, to blank my user discussion site would be a good idea. This and the fact, that the user only upload bad quality exhibistionistic porn, he should be blocked for a time.

Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:51, 1 July 2014 (UTC) PS: Second time

Blocked --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

User:Ogono godspower

Resolved

• User: Ogono godspower (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: for [13]

Havang(nl) (talk) 12:10, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

• • User warned. Yann (talk) 12:52, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Marking as resolved. — Revi_complaint? 08:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

68.190.2.124

Resolved

• User: 68.190.2.124 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Repeated inane deletion request on the same image after it was kept. Vydra (talk) 17:52, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Warned. I reverted the DR. Yann (talk) 18:35, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Marking as resolved. — Revi_complaint? 08:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Waisenbube/IP

Resolved

• User: Waisenbube/IP (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: [14] + [15] + [16] + [17].

__Simsalabimbam (talk) 14:30, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

I'm failing to see the issue, other than that they are uploading over your uploads. Are these copyright violations, are you reporting an upload war? Please be more specific. Thanks, Tiptoety ^talk 19:29, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

it's the same behaviour as in this case: [18] (2012). --Simsalabimbam (talk) 05:38, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, but everything is Stale. No action taken. Tiptoety ^talk 02:11, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

[19] 2003:50:AD35:5278:F1A9:AB04:6812:A6E1 07:09, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Devinorte

Resolved

• User: Devinorte (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Usuario títere de Geógrafo23, bloqueado en es.wikipedia. Chico512 (talk) 04:03, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

 Done blocked and nuked. Thanks for the info! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 04:46, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Hishashanka

Pending

• User: Hishashanka (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Uploading of copyrighted images, inspite of receiving warnings.

Amartyabag (talk) 16:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

 Done User warned, copyvios deleted. Yann (talk) 18:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Ranj

Resolved

• User: Ranj (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: 30 miuntes ago I've found the File:RETARDED KID.jpg into the Category:Media requiring renaming. Seeing the file (this is the rename request), I've tagged it for speedy deletion (see also: COM:IDENT#Defamation). Reading the description I've seen that picture's subject is "Ranj" (as uploader's nick), than I've found this deletion request (badly formatted). This case seemed clear: a new user wrongly uploaded a joke image about himself and after requested a deletion. Ok, no problem... But I've discovered something really strange. In the first upload it seems he was conscious of what he was uploading (see CATEGORY:RETARD FAKER and description WARNING THIS KID IS RETARD). Two hours later he made this change into the file description (writing that the subject was him), then he added this and only after he requested a rename to "wrongupload.jpg" (I think as an attempt to request deletion). I would assume good faith but, IMHO, the intent to upload this kind of file looks like clear, and not just a wrong upload... User could have done it intentionally, then he repent, I dunno. Btw, I left this report for "safety", just because defamatory files are a serious issue. Of course, I request file deletion as soon as possible. Thanks. --Dэя-Бøяg 01:32, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

 Done I left a warning and some info on his talk page. I don't think a block is needed at this point. For good measure the filename is edit protected as well. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:21, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanx a lot. Anyway, I'll watch in case of eventual other edits as this. Greets. --Dэя-Бøяg 02:25, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Strorm

Resolved

• User: Strorm (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Repeatedly uploading copyrighted images, ripped from the web, as own work, in spite of multiple warnings on their talk page. In one case uploading the same image again and again, each time having it speedily deleted as a copyvio. The copyvio images uploaded here have been added to articles on en-WP, where he has now been blocked indefinitely for repeated copyvios.

Thomas.W ^talk 14:44, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

 Blocked for a week. Yann (talk) 16:30, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Patmagno

Resolved

• User: Patmagno (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: User has uploaded copyvio images of Filipina acreess Shy Carlos, in spite of numerous warnings telling the user to refrain from doing so.

Blakegripling ph (talk) 02:06, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

 Done 1 week block. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:28, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

72.209.215.243

Resolved

• User: 72.209.215.243 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Plain vandalism

HelenOnline 18:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:11, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Joseso19

Resolved

• User: Joseso19 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: This user uploaded various non-free files, for vandalical purposes at es:Wikipedia, ignoring the several warnings. Also, the user vandalized es:Wikipedia, then reported there, too (and has been blocked permanently). Please block user and speedelly delete all his uploads. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Amitie 10g (talk) 03:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

 Done All files deleted. He already have a warning, will be blocked if uploading more copyvios. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:59, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

This is clearly an account created for vandalize and still uploading vandalical pictures. Please Block him inmediatelly, delete all his uploads and hide all his editions. Already blocked at es:Wikipedia. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:29, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

 Done Blocked indef, 70 (c) porn pics from the net today. Indef blocked. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:32, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Meerta

Resolved

• User: Meerta (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: User is only here to discuss about the mokey drama and to PUSH his POV (except two upload). Per the comments on this talk page the user seems not to change his behavior. I request to block the user indefinitely or for a longer period for "trolling". Regards -- Steinsplitter (talk) 13:08, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

 Support At least one month block, until the drama is over. Yann (talk) 14:31, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

 Done Blocked for 1 month per Yann and Steinsplitter w/ tp access removed. I also looked at this acct's edits on en.wiki, and almost all of them were to 1 ongoing dispute, just as they are here. If any other admin disagrees with this extended block, please feel free to unblock or change it. INeverCry 18:57, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

173.60.192.129

Resolved

• User: 173.60.192.129 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Nonsensical deletion request for my (almost empty) user page.

Vydra (talk) 11:23, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

I've removed the DR from your userpage, deleted the DR page, and removed it from the daily listing. I also reverted the talkpage notice. The above IP looks to be dynamic, so a block is useless. I'll keep your user page on my watchlist, and protect it if another attack occurs. INeverCry 18:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Eloquence

Resolved

• User: Eloquence (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Image thief, Eloquence must be to know it much better!!! He uploaded an image with a false license tag: File:Fundraising_screenshot_02.png

Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Not done - Yes he should have made a proper atribution and yes he should have included the right licese tagg. Yes he didnot behave himself elswhere. But all of this no reason to report him for vandalisme when he simply misunderstood Commons policy's. No need to dramatise things even more. Natuur12 (talk) 21:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

• • Still  Not done for me. User Eloquence from our WMF staff must to know it much much better! This is simly vandalism for me! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:07, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

This image was uploaded in 2012 (!). I would not block anyone for a two years old copyvio. --A.Savin 22:28, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Seriously Alchemist, you're trying to get a WMF staffer banned over a single 2 year old copyvio? -mattbuck (Talk) 22:44, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

I answer in german, because my englich is to small: ich habe erst Heute von dem Bild erfahren. Und nun frage ich mich: wofür haben wir denn unsere Lizenzbausteine und die Lizenzbedingungen, wenn diejenigen die es am besten wissen müßten diese einfach ignorieren! Auch ein Eloquence muß sich an die hier aufgestellten Regeln halten. Ich sehe Lizenzverstöße als eine sehr ernste Sache an! Nun könnt ihr machen was ihr wollt/now you can do what you like. Bye, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:36, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

I have no tolerance for this. That's cow-cookies. No action to be taken, thread closed. Holy cow! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:47, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

That's about I'm thinking about: no more image donation for Commons/Wikipedia. It is only a license ... we can ignore it, unimportant ...

Resolved

. Bye. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:34, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Verklage die WMF auf die üblichen Lizenzgebühren da sie wissentlich gegen die vergebene Lizenz verstoßen haben. Keine Gnade bei sowas da man gerade von der WMF eine Einhaltung solcher Lizenzen erwarten kann.--Denniss (talk) 08:29, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Eher sollte man ihn wegen ignoring communety consensus and abusing staff rights sperren. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:32, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Jetzt kommt mal wieder 'runter. Übrigens ist dieses mw.user.isAnon() unnötig, da das Gadget sowieso nur aktiv ist, wenn der Benutzer das "purge"-Recht hat. Das ist z.Z. "the recommended way", ein Gadget nur für angemeldete Benutzer zu aktivieren. Siehe bugzilla:42171. Oder funktioniert dieser Rechte-Hack nicht mehr? Lupo 08:45, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

NigelHowells

Resolved

• User: NigelHowells (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: vandal and copyright problems

Atamari (talk) 22:38, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

• User: NigelHowells (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: String of nonsensical deletion requests

Oxyman (talk) 22:53, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

 Done by Materialscientist --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 00:26, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Trassiorf

Pending

• User: Trassiorf (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: The user deletes useful categories ([20], [21], [22])

Mithril (talk) 16:41, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Trassiorf seems to be confused. Edits don't make sense. I asked on his talk page. Maybe it's a harmless hiccup. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:17, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Nickguarino

Resolved

• User: Nickguarino (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: crosswiki vandal-only account that uploaded this file to vandalize en.wiki. Just to resume: His first edit (enwiki) sounded like a newbie error but, seeing the image title of second edit (trash can) I had a suspect and searched for the image linked (in the 1st edit): this one. After a 4th level warning, he added the picture uploaded here (the trash can with Matty B face). Clearly a vandal-only account trolling en:Matty B page, to indef ban as soon as possible. Btw, I've still reported him at en:WP:AIV. --Dэя-Бøяg 02:46, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

 Indef. blocked Upload nuked. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:10, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. --Dэя-Бøяg 03:10, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

5.104.108.125

Resolved

• User: 5.104.108.125 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Cross-wiki vandalism; came here to leave this message on my talk page after I blocked him, revoked his talk page access on enwiki and suggested that his use of Nazi language from an IP resolving to Germany might not be a very good idea from a legal standpoint. I wouldn't be surprised if he does this again. Daniel Case (talk) 18:03, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Done - blocked him for two weeks. If this continues on other projects you might want to ask for a global block. Natuur12 (talk) 18:08, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
    • Never mind, already requested a global lock. User looks like this LTA. Not a hundred percent (95% sure) sure but a user making comments like that cross wiki is unwanted as well. Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
      • Yeah, that's Wikinger, and he'll be back @Daniel Case: , either here or on en.wiki with another open proxy to post whatever diffs he was referring to, and more nonsense. I've rev del'd the edit & summary, and I'll keep your page on watch in case semi-protection is needed, as it often is. He may start targeting your edits/pages here or on en.wiki. So far, he's targeted every single one of FutPerf's edits here over the past year or two atleast... INeverCry 21:16, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. I'll let you know if he does anything. Daniel Case (talk) 03:22, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

I hate Tory Ailes

Resolved

• User: I hate Tory Ailes (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Sockpuppet of banned User:David Beals, using ceiling fan images to vandalize en.wiki and wiktionary

NawlinWiki (talk) 22:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

• Blocked him. Deleted the upload. CU is looking into it. Natuur12 (talk) 22:22, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

• Seems done. Natuur12 (talk) 22:39, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Driigt Hiift and Vvvgcfff

Resolved

• User: Driigt Hiift (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• User: Vvvgcfff (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: More David Beals socks. Please be aware that any uploads of pictures of ceiling fans or QR codes by new editors are almost certainly David Beals socks. He has been doing this every day for the past few days.

NawlinWiki (talk) 17:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Done- blocked him and asked Trijnstel to have a look at it. Natuur12 (talk) 17:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Done (the checkuser part, see cu-l, also for those below) Trijnstel_talk 20:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Buckeal Yung and Fatonio Rawlings

Resolved

• User: Buckeal Yung (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• User: Fatonio Rawlings (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: More David Beals fan/QR code vandalism

NawlinWiki (talk) 19:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

•  DoneAlso blocked those accounts, deleted the upload. Natuur12 (talk) 19:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

• Requested a global lock for those accounts, the one in the previous request and the one you mentioned at my talk page before they turn up on another project. Natuur12 (talk) 19:18, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

 Question Could you please add the sockpuppet template? --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 19:59, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Did so and I will try to find the other socks without the sockpuppet template. Natuur12 (talk) 20:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

John Franklin Square etc

Resolved

• User: John Franklin Square (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• User: Benjamin Smith Avenue (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Yet more David Beals socks.

NawlinWiki (talk) 21:04, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Done blocked them, asked for a global lock etc etc Natuur12 (talk) 21:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Also  Done CU wise. Trijnstel_talk 21:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Heelo Grrru

Resolved

• User: Heelo Grrru (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: More David Beals, blocked on en.wiki for vandalism

NawlinWiki (talk) 01:43, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

 Done Blocked. INeverCry 02:28, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Donotenterhere2014

Resolved

• User: Donotenterhere2014 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Sock of banned User:Paul Easter, back after an absence promoting his homemade films

NawlinWiki (talk) 20:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Done - blocked him. Let's hope he will stay quiet. Natuur12 (talk) 20:34, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Pompommam

Resolved

• User: Pompommam (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Nothing but vandalism and copyvio images. Blocked at enwiki for similar activity. 99.118.34.43 22:00, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

 Done Blocked. INeverCry 22:23, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

USER/IP

Resolved

• User: USER/IP (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: REASON.

I have no idea who did this, as the part of the page that's vandalized doesn't show in the edit or history.

But please fix it back. (It's the aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa in the "other versions" part).

88.114.202.195 08:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism at Template:Other versions/Digestive system diagram. Thanks for reporting --Denniss (talk) 09:09, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Calvin Farwell

Resolved

• User: Calvin Farwell (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: sock of User:David Beals, ceiling fan vandal

NawlinWiki (talk) 19:56, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

 Done Blocked, and upload deleted. INeverCry 20:19, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Robin Compdou

Resolved

• User: Robin Compdou (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Latest David Beals/ceiling fan sock

NawlinWiki (talk) 12:32, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

 Done Nuked and blocked. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 14:43, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

DR of :File:Flag map of Greater Vietnam.png opened three times from three differen IPs

Resolved

• Users:

• 115.178.26.105 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• 42.115.80.51 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• 42.115.21.242 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• 203.144.92.208 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• 203.144.92.34 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user

• Reasons for reporting: The user(s) under the above IPs (and possibly the same person using a Proxy) opened a DR for the file indicated above. He/she didn't provided any valid reason and refuses to follow the OTRS process to claim the authorship (if he/she really is the copyright holder). In the third nomination, the IP user threatens the uploader, that I considered all of them as a vandalical DR without any basis.

If the file is really inside the project scope, once closed the DR, I suggets to protect the file.

Amitie 10g (talk) 19:12, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

 Done Closed as speedy keep and semi-protected. The issue is that the map contains what are now parts of Cambodia and Laos, and not any copyright violation. INeverCry 03:30, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Parts? It contains 100% of those 2 countries, a claim for which I found no support, trusting these articles. This image is a good example of what Commons should not be hosting — it is neither in use (not even in a user page, which could excuse contentlessness and bogusity) nor it includes sources or even a suggestion of usability in its description. I voted against an ill-formed DR, but would vote to delete this and many others in a properly worded DR. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:57, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

I closed this because of the continued disruption from the IPs and the lack of a sufficient rationale for deletion. I'm not experienced with fictional maps/flags (if that's what this would be called), so if you or someone else wants to DR this & other images like it, I'll stand back and learn something new. INeverCry 02:50, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

I tagged the map as fictional and disputed. I wonder what would happen here if someone makes a map where the US is part of Mexico or Canada. Or even better: France as a part of Great Britain. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:08, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

There are many such items under fictional flags and fictional maps — the amount and cleverness of protest against them should not be a reason to delete, however. I have nothing against those (indeed you could google that plus my name to know I played that game a lot in the past), but I think Commons’ scope does not include random gratuitous depictions self-created non-notable fictional items, there should at least be a descriptions of what it is and where it comes from. The costumary exemption for use page files, but again that is not a limitless escape clause. (And possibly this discussion should go somewhere else.) -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:02, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

ModAppi, Mysticseaport

Resolved

• User: ModAppi (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• User: Mysticseaport (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: More David Beals ceiling fan vandalism. Please block and delete contributions. Thanks.

NawlinWiki (talk) 03:23, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

 Nuked and blocked --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:44, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Tubin Cohu

Resolved

• User: Tubin Cohu (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: David Beals, same old same old. Please block and delete the file.

NawlinWiki (talk) 17:18, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

 Blocked and nuked --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 17:27, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Nifl99, Mobimaks

Resolved

• Nifl99 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Mobimaks (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: These two users are vandalizing the map of Daylight saving time by adding incorrect and POV pushing information. After someone corrected the map by making Crimea orange as it follows Russian time not Ukrainian, they have been constantly reverting it back to Ukrainian time. I stated that no matter what your POV on Crimea is, it follows Russian time and that a user can be reported for POV pushing, although even after that one of them once again reverted the map. I suspect this to also be a case of sock puppetry as the two accounts have only made edits to this map and no other activity is present as if they were only created for this purpose. I strongly believe that these two accounts were made by one person who doesn't want to put acts of POV pushing on their own account. Leftcry (talk) 21:04, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

• I've full-protected the file temporarily to end any edit-warring. It may be a better idea to upload the map showing Crimea as part of Russia as a seperate file, and let individual wikis decide which to use. If this is done, I would suggest protecting both files long-term to avoid the inevitable edit-warring. INeverCry 23:00, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

• INeverCry, I really don't want to have to make another file for this as the current file has been used for a very long time and many people look back to it for historic purposes. As for Crimea, it has already been changed on most files on the page including the counter Daylight Saving Time file, so the choice of individual wikis has pretty much been determined. So if you could please first revert the last edit made by Mobimaks and then full protect the file that would be a lot better. Thank you! --Leftcry (talk) 00:33, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

•  Done INeverCry 22:29, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Herrimam

Resolved

• User: Herrimam (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: As for this deletion request user confused Commons with Facebook. He uploaded lots of unsed and personal images, most of them deleted per project scope. For example this and this other deletion requests are this file, uploaded 2 days after the deletion, noticed onto his talk. I know this because at es:CGRR#Fuentes, the subject of the file "Yoa" has the same name and surname of this deleted file. Anyway, apart this habit to upload again deleted files, despite the notices, he uploaded some unlicensed files, created pages as Campismo el salto (now empty because all files were deleted) and Vida nueva (see first and second rollback), that are out of project scope and promotional about a group based in a town in western Cuba. This file was saved 1 year ago because it was used on eswiki, but in this promotioal edit by Herrimam above the article es:Shekhiná, now removed. Before it was added here (now removed), in the page es:Vida Nueva, that is unrelated (it is a Spanish literary magazine). The only 3 files used on Wikipedia are the ones in the article es:CGRR, edited only by Herrimam. this portraits are used as "sources" (???), this one could be the only one useful for the project scope but, trying to understand what is es:CGRR I've found on this Cuban government website that the CGRR (center for management for risk reduction) is not (as wroten in the lead of eswiki article) based only in Mantua, but in several Cuban cities and towns. I don't know es.wiki policies but is IMHO normal to have a general page about this subject instead of a page about a section of it. Just to remark that user contribs at eswiki look like the same to the ones here (including the speedy deletion of "Campismo el salto"). All this looks like a localist (to Mantua, Cuba) promotional attitude, completely out of project scopes (and in write-only, also using his UP). Anyway, several edits looking like nonsenses. Just to make an example: this file showing a man playing the drums is named "Iglesia Mantua" ("Church Mantua"), picture's subject changed completely 3 times, description says "imagen", picture is unused and (IMHO) unusable and, reading the "Comment" into file history... again "Yoandri" (file's subject of this and this other DR, as said above). Also this file changed subject (but was rollbacked by Palosirkka). For all the reasons shown I request an indef ban: user periodically continues to upload the same kind of files (or the same files) despite all the notices and DR. I suggest, who can, to report this case to the admins of eswiki, just to control the edits.

• Note #1: Before my investigation I created the Category:Vida Nueva to add that pictures. I'm sorry... Of course, I'm going to request the speedy deletion of that category and files.
• Note #2: I forgot to mention this DR about "files uploaded by Herrimam".
• Note #3: I request a speedy deletion for all the files and pages, including this one, also used for his local promo and because, at this point, user contribs are IMHO all untrustable. Anyway, I found also the deleted Category:Grupo Vida Nueva. Anyway, I suspect a self-promotional intention: re-creation of the "Yoandri" files, addition of "Yoandri, Gomez" categories for example here or in this sort of self-vandalism (the one reverted by Motopark), usage of his portrait as source at es.wp is a bit strange

Concluding: I perceive a substantial incompatibility with the project scopes (including WP) that looks like vandalism in write-only. Sorry for my usual length explaining the reported cases and regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 04:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

I've not seen this vandalism still now. --Dэя-Бøяg 14:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Blocked for 5 days and added a informations template about the PS to users talkpage. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:40, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. I've seen you deleted this file... Also the other ones (01, 02, 03, 04, 05 and 06. see a previous mass DR), lesser useful for project scope, (and the category created by me before), need to be deleted. Btw, I've also removed that portraits used as sources on eswiki. Thanks again. --Dэя-Бøяg 15:41, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

My User page is vandalized

Resolved

My User page User:Vshustov has been vandalized on September 11 2014 by removing the following two entries: 1. Elderly_fitness_exercise.gif and 2. To-seismic-sustainability-through-earthquake-protector.gif which were immediately deleted by User:INeverCry without any discussion or crying (I mean her User name). However, it's never too late! Let's play by the rules, please... Vshustov (talk) 08:49, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

No vandalism here , therefore  . Please read COM:L--Steinsplitter (talk) 10:48, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

User:Silar

Resolved

• User: Silar (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Silar reverts constantly the right category - File:0.2014 Franziskanerkloster Sanok.JPG in this file. This ilustration has an appropriate category: Category:Statue of Virgin Mary at Franciscan Church in Sanok (anniversary 1377-1977), but user Silar still reverts and changes to the over category Category:Franciscan Monastery in Sanok and that is not agreeable, because there is an exact category within. Please react to this.

Lowdown (talk) 13:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

 Not here, User problems please. — Revi_complaint? 13:48, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Inaidfeew and Wapner Ethel

Resolved

• User: Inaidfeew (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• User: Wapner Ethel (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: David Beals sockpuppets, uploading usual ceiling fan garbage. Note that Inaidfeew uploaded the file and Wapner created a deceptive redirect. Please block and delete the upload and the redirect page.

NawlinWiki (talk) 02:39, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Blocked and tagged, and image & redirect deleted. INeverCry 03:25, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

93.44.110.225

Pending

• User: 93.44.110.225 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: At first IP 93.40.203.170 deleted a text on deletion request [23]. Then IP 93.44.110.225 (the same person, I guess) nominated a page with deletion request for deletion [24], [25]. --Juggler2005 (talk) 14:20, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

刘海梁1986

 Done

• User: 刘海梁1986 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Many times add the copyright photo

9shi (talk) 04:19, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

I warned him/her. Next time (s)he should be blocked. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Alvavargas

ResolvedDeleted all uploads. User is warned, if they resume uploading copyvios, they should be blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 03:24, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

• User: Alvavargas (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: User contribs need IMHO a control for license problems and other. Several files have no sources or they are Street View screenshots, others are duplicate and others are tagged by deletion request, by the same Alvavargas. All the pictures are about the Church of Firavitoba, a Colombian municipality in Boyacá Department. About the church page is contributing the user on eswiki. Btw:

• The File:Iglesia de Firavitoba5.jpg (8 Sept, 18:444) has 3 dupes: File:Iglesiafira.png (8 Sept, 22:12), File:Iglesiafira1.jpg (9 Sept, 2:53), File:Iglesiafira2.jpg (9 Sept, 3:42). Anyway all of them are only 398x375, and there is this image of the facade uploaded by Baiji in 2007. So, they are IMHO, all superseded.

• The File:Vidrieraigle.jpg (10 Sept, 4:36) is a dupe of File:Vidrieraiglesia.png (8 Sept, 22:46).

• The File:Baldaquinofira5.png (8 Sept, 22:55) has 3 dupes: File:Baldaquinoiglesia.png (9 Sept, 1:48), File:Baldaquinofira6.png (9 Sept, 2:12), File:Baldaquinofir.jpg (9 Sept, 3:05).

• The File:Baldaquinofir.jpg (9 Sept, 3:05) is a dupe of the File:Baldaquinofira2.png (8 Sept, 22:55).

• The File:Nuestra Señora de las Nieves de Firavitoba5.pdf hasn't a valid copyright tag. Curiously, some minutes after the upload, Alvavargas requested a rename to the current title but, 2 hours later, he requested another rename, to the original title.

• DR and tags: Yesterday user opened 5 deletion requests: for Vidrieraiglesia.png, for Flagfira.png (see file), for Baldaquinofira2.png, for Baldaquinofira5.png and Iglesiafira1.jpg. The reasons given are no source. He also tagged his files for missing permission/no source: 01, 02 and 03... Ok, assuming good faith, user has (maybe) noticed the invalid copyright status of his uploads and wanted to repair. Ok but, why the dupes of the files tagged for DR by the same author haven't been also tagged and they're still used on es:Iglesia de Firavitoba, edited still today? And mainly, if he understood the source/copyright problem, why he today uploaded some files with the mark "Google"?

• The files uploaded today: File:Iglesiafira3.jpg (author changes from G. Eearth to Alvavargas), File:Iglesiafira4.jpg, File:Iglesiafira8.jpg, File:Iglesiafira6.jpg, File:Iglesiafira5.jpg have the mark "Google Earth" in the lower right corner. Also the file File:Iglesiafira7.jpg, not marked with "Google", seems to be clearly taken from Google. Just to control, I found Firavitoba on G.Maps and seen it on Street View: if you observe the church from the road named "Kr 3A" (and "Kr 4") you can see that the pictures are taken from Street View. For what I know, this images are not free.

To resume: The only files not tagged for license problems/speedy del/DR (also by the same author) are their duplicates and so, all of them have a copyvio problem and IMHO need to be deleted. --Dэя-Бøяg 23:53, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Note (14 September): After warnings and deletions, today user resume to upload copyvios. File:Vidrieraf.jpg is a dupe of the deleted files Vidrieraigle.jpg and Vidrieraiglesia.png. And (to repeat) the DR for Vidrieraiglesia.png was opened by the same Alvavargas. I don't understand user's behavior: a day he uploads a file, another day he uploads a duplicate of it, after he requests file's deletion and, the day after deletion... he uploads it again. Is it a strange way to make fun of the project? Btw, copyvio after warnings and write-only. --Dэя-Бøяg 15:45, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Blocked for two weeks.--Denniss (talk) 15:51, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

User:Zalo941

Resolved

• User: Zalo941 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Has been taking pictures of detention centers in the United States, then using photo editing software to change the name on the front of the center. For example, changing "prison" to "hotel". This user then uploads the deceptive photo into a Wikipedia article, such as this one. Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 01:25, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Uploads nuked, user blocked. INeverCry 01:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Thuy Ho

Pending

• User: Thuy Ho (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: All recent uploads (mostly scanned portraits of bishops and religious artwork) are tagged as own work, but look to be the same sort of copyvios which were deleted last year. Some of the photos are of people who died long enough ago that it's unlikely the uploader could possibly be the photographer (judging by the self-portrait on his user page, anyway).

Psychonaut (talk) 09:00, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Hunter Marinov

Resolved

• User: Hunter Marinov (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: David Beals sock, already blocked on en.wiki

NawlinWiki (talk) 16:00, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:11, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

JackTorrance311

Resolved

• User: JackTorrance311 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Uploading vandalized images (including historical photos with Hitler edited into them).

~Kevin Payravi (talk) 18:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Gone. --Denniss (talk) 18:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

108.194.238.251

Resolved

• User: 108.194.238.251 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Special:Contributions/108.194.238.251

Jee 03:19, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Blocked. Geagea (talk) 03:24, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

HHubi

Resolved

• User: HHubi (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: I blocked HHubi for vandalism (starting nonsense DR on used files) and controversial rename requests after warnings. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:21, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

FYI, he had some rename requests after denied by admin. (i.e.this) — revi^{^} 12:36, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

I support this block. People should not request renames over and over again if they disagree with a decline. That is frustrating the system. And DR's like this one are notdone imho. Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

• HHubi was editing disruptively before his block and not communicating via talk pages. S/he should be encouraged to discuss his/her concerns (in German perhaps, since s/he may not be fluent in English).[26] His/her block may be terminated early if s/he agrees to stop disrupting Commons. Good block, but I would say it is for disruption, not vandalism. Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:18, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

He is also removing warnings he received months ago... I setting this as {{Resolved}} because no disagreement. --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:40, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Inappropriate description on Wikimedia

Resolved

• User: 86.207.188.169 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: REASON. - inappropriate description

I would like to report an inappropriate description by an unknown user on the page commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Temple_of_Athena_Nike_in_Athens The French reads "This temple is shit, we don't give a shit about it".

Can this be removed? 80.111.227.253 10:07, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Typical vandalism. Reverted to earlier version. --Túrelio (talk) 10:11, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

HHubi

Resolved

• User: HHubi (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Continuing with sating DR on used files and requesting wrong renamings after warnings. Please re block.

Steinsplitter (talk) 15:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

46.119.117.255

Resolved

• User: 46.119.117.255 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Created a bunch of spam pages cross-wiki. Already globally blocked but please delete the local pages.

Ajraddatz (talk) 02:40, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 02:43, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/46.118.159.145 too; same spam. Ajraddatz (talk) 02:45, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 02:49, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Nuuhgtv

Resolved

• User: Nuuhgtv (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: The usual David Beals fan image. Please block and delete user's upload. Thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:30, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

 Done Yann (talk) 16:44, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

81.210.42.195

Resolved

• User: 81.210.42.195 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Vandalism

79.130.38.212 06:39, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Blocked & edit summary hidden. Long-term troll wikinger. --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Endcunda

Resolved

• User: Endcunda (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Continues his pre-block {{Delete}} abuse.    FDMS  4    14:41, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:36, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Tyler1193

Pending

• User: Tyler1193 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LerkSkidwaker.jpg pointless sh*t then used for vandalism on en.wiki.

77.96.249.228 20:04, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Rubbfiri, Yuboktying

Resolved

• User: Rubbfiri (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• User: Yuboktying (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: David Beals sockpuppets again. Please block and delete the usual ceiling fan files.

NawlinWiki (talk) 21:58, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Blocked, tagged, deleted. INeverCry 22:14, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

DABustersBar

Resolved

• User: DABustersBar (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Another David Beals sock, please block and delete the fan photo. Thanks.

NawlinWiki (talk) 01:43, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Done - Thank you, Tiptoety ^talk 02:30, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Wurpless

Resolved

• User: Wurpless (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: While I was controlling a theater-related disambiguation category (not empty) I've found two files by the user. To resume: yet another self-promotional account using Commons to stock several pictures to use on Wikipedia. I discovered the article it:Wurpless (an Italian theatre group), tagged for speedy deletion as promo and created by the same Wurpless. Anyway, I've tagged for speedy deletion all the files uploaded here (01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07 and 08). Just to have a confirm, I've searched "Wurpless" on google.it and found quite nothing (a YouTube video, a FB profile). I request the indef ban as self-promo only (and crosswiki) account. Thanks. --Dэя-Бøяg 20:57, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: The article it:Wurpless has been deleted... Anyway, a reflection: suddenly it happens that somebody uses Wikipedia as a soapbox for self-promo articles, also not matching notability criteria. Same users fill Commons of pictures used only for that articles (until their deletion). Sometimes it happens that while they are discovered and blocked on Wikipedia, their promo uploads are not reported to Commons patrol and go unnoticed. So, sometimes, several files out of project scope remain here for a long time. A rapid block and file deltions could help to counteract this habit by promo-only accounts, IMHO. Thanks. --Dэя-Бøяg 21:27, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done Uploads nuked, user blocked indef. INeverCry 21:28, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for attention. --Dэя-Бøяg 21:30, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Corazo

Pending

• User: Corazo (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Repeated vandalism of category structure.

jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 22:00, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

I see only one problematic edit. Yann (talk) 10:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

All of his five edits are 100% trolling. -- Tuválkin ✉ 12:34, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Both edits to Category:S-Video were vandalism. Seems to have stopped now, I was just being cautious in case it didn't. --jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 20:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Антон патріот

Resolved

• User: Антон патріот (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: This user created a POV pushing file in which he depicted Crimea as a follower of Ukrainian time even though it switched to Russian time all the way back in March, he then replaced the correct map with his POV pushing/incorrect map on almost all of the pages which used the map, including pages in other languages. Can someone please delete the file and revert the user's changes returning the correct map. Leftcry (talk) 22:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

File deleted after restoring good version, user warned. --Denniss (talk) 23:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Denniss, The user has just repeated his actions. --Leftcry (talk) 06:28, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done I've blocked the user indef, used GlobalReplace to revert his 75 changes, and deleted the re-uploaded file. INeverCry 07:03, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Kayatw

Resolved

• User: Kayatw (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: This user uploaded copyvio images repeatedly regardless of warnings.

Wcam (talk) 15:01, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:05, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

TheRedPenOfDoom

Resolved

• User: TheRedPenOfDoom (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Keeps adding his political agenda into this file.

Kohelet (talk) 00:17, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Bad behaviour by both of you, use the talk page for content disputes. The claims the original source data is not based on 100% facts is valid. I have therefore moved the file to reflect this. --Denniss (talk) 09:18, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

TheRedPenOfDoom just repeated his actions, here. However, I did step in and revert this change promptly. DLindsley (talk) 17:44, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

 DoneProtected --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:14, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Purlziggy

Resolved

• User: Purlziggy (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Replacing photos with pornographic images.

Mike V • Talk 01:25, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done User VOA blocked, overwrites removed. INeverCry 01:36, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

@INeverCry: Please double check the file history. It's still visible. Mike V • Talk 01:39, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Some kind of bug affecting the thumb display. I have no way of fixing it myself. I VOA blocked another sock and have full upload protected. INeverCry 02:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

@Mike V: @Tutelary: The thumb is back to normal for me. INeverCry 02:12, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Same for me. :) Thanks for your help in resolving the issue. Mike V • Talk 05:59, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Purlziggy

Resolved

This user keeps uploading a image with clear privacy and copyright violation, overwriting File:Jennifer Lawrence at the 83rd Academy Awards crop.jpg, and keeps deleting the speedy deletion requests of his image. Tm (talk) 01:29, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

 Comment Case as already been taken care by INeverCry. Tm (talk) 01:32, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Irmagild8920

 Done

• User: Irmagild8920 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: File:Blue morpho butterfly 300x271.jpg

--64.85.215.152 12:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Image (version) deleted and user blocked for 1 week. --Túrelio (talk) 12:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

University of Pennsylvania

Resolved

• User: University of Pennsylvania (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: David Beals sock with the usual fan uploads - please block and delete both files, thanks.

NawlinWiki (talk) 00:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 01:07, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

141.91.240.163, return of Flow92?

Resolved

• User: 141.91.240.163 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: This seems to be the return of Hamburg-based Flow92/Invitto/Hamburg73 who used a series of 141.91.240 ip addresses. Useless edits to Nissan pages such as this one and this one matches Flow92's obsession with miscategorizing and confusing various Nissan vehicles. See also earlier investigations. NB, I am totally willing to accept that this may be a coincidence and maybe this is some other user, but at least if Flow92 should return with his previous ferocity we already have a start.

mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 02:49, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Blocked by INeverCry. Green Giant (talk) 13:08, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Christiannese

Resolved

• User: Christiannese (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: David Beals sockpuppet, already blocked on en.wiki. Thanks!

NawlinWiki (talk) 12:57, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:05, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

GuffElofFriends

Resolved

• User: GuffElofFriends (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Another David Beals sockpuppet, back with the same Dave & Buster's ceiling fan file. Please block and delete, and please watch for this picture repeatedly being uploaded. Thanks!

NawlinWiki (talk) 03:26, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 04:08, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Legenderfox

Resolved

• User: Legenderfox (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Keeps stealing images from other websites, and uploading them on to Commons. Please block him and review his uploads. Thanks.

DLindsley (talk) 01:01, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

P.S. I've nominated at least some of his uploads for speedy deletion as copyvios, if you want to review those. DLindsley (talk) 01:04, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Uploads nuked. Only 4 uploads and 1 talkpage edit, so not blockable yet. Next step should be an {{End of copyvios}} warning, and after that a short block if necessary. INeverCry 04:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks INeverCry for nuking his uploads. His behavior seems to have ceased. DLindsley (talk) 13:21, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

USER/IP

Resolved

• User: USER/IP (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: REASON.

Why someone removes pictures from wikicommons without contacting the person having uploaded it?! 'Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work' is no argument at all! I obtained the permission from the photographer and uploaded the file (because the photographer is no wiki-person and has other things to do, but you can contact him immediately, as soon as I got the signal that there is a problem). But simply removing is quite arrogant. CorneliusHasselblatt (talk) 17:38, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

I'm guessing this is about File:Veenker.jpg, which was deleted by Krd. When uploading, you stated that this was your own work and that you were the copyright holder, which is obviously not true. You also linked the author's name to your user page, which is misleading. Regardless of whether you obtained the author's permission to upload the file, those untrue and misleading details on the file description did make it a copyright violation. Such files are eligible for deletion without prior warning (though you should have been notified after the fact). Such deletions are in accordance with policy and do not constitute vandalism. To get the file undeleted, please follow our documented procedure. Do note that permission to upload the file to Commons is not sufficient; you need the author's permission to publish the photo under a license that allows anyone to use it in modified or unmodified form for any purpose, including commercial purposes. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:09, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Closing as resolved: No admin action needed. — revi_msg 05:05, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

User:Everyprune

Resolved

[27]- --Gripweed (talk) 21:54, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

I see that the file (version) has been deleted, so no real worries here. DLindsley (My talk page) 16:43, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done. One version deleted by -revi as a copyright violation. Green Giant (talk) 12:23, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Mtec

Resolved

• User: Mtec (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Vandalisms on File:Jean d'Alembert.jpeg and File:Tallinn Nevski detail.JPG. Thanks.

HB (talk) 13:34, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done. One file revision deleted. The Tallinn revision was just a lower quality image. User has been warned. Green Giant (talk) 13:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

BrianMalting

Resolved

• User: BrianMalting (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Two nonsense uploaded images were used for attack pages on en.wiki. Not sure if this qualifies as vandalism or is blockable here, but they've been blocked over there.

§FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Drmahmadi

Resolved

• User: Drmahmadi (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Apparently a promotion only account. Their talk page is full of nothing but DR talk page notices and one warning.

DLindsley (My talk page) 23:37, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 16:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Xm1702

Resolved

• User: Xm1702 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: permanent copy vio - see his talk page

Codc (talk) 07:08, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Yann Has given him a final warning. INeverCry 16:36, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

FordK500

Resolved

• User: FordK500 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Promotion-only account. I nominated a file uploaded by him, which is File:FordEcoBoost300.png, for deletion as being taken from a promotional site, and being out of Commons' scope. He then proceeded to re-upload this file under a different name, which is File:FordEcoboost.png, after JuTa deleted it yesterday. I have nominated the re-uploaded file for deletion, and I hope an administrator sees the nomination page soon. You also might want to consider asking him what he is uploading this file for. Thanks.

DLindsley (My talk page) 22:12, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

The files are slightly different, one being EcoBoost 300, the other 400, but still another obvious copyvio. I've warned the uploader. As for the promo angle, this uploader may just be a fan of Ford. Ford-related logos would very likely be in scope with proper permission, which I doubt would be forthcoming. INeverCry 23:11, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Timothe8872

Resolved

• User: Timothe8872 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Does not stop uploading copyrighted images.

Milad A380 ^talk? 21:14, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Taken care of at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections#Timothe8872. INeverCry 21:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Omateus11

Resolved

• User: Omateus11 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Seems to be a possible sockpuppet of WikiDiego91, due to the fact that this account reuploaded File:WWE Hell In A Cell 2014 Poster With Dean Ambrose.jpg after Denniss deleted it on October 12th. Please block and delete this recent upload by him. Thanks.

DLindsley (My talk page) 01:55, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

All images deleted, but leaving block to others. — revi_msg 03:48, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Since WikiDiego91 is only on a 1-month block so far, it would probably be better to have a CU look at this new account before we pin it on Diego, and likely increase his block/warn him, etc. @Magog the Ogre: @Krd: @Jameslwoodward: INeverCry 05:42, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

One doesn't need checkuser privileges to see that sockpuppetry is unlikely. Aside from Commons, Omateus11 has only been active on Portuguese Wikipedia, while WikiDiego91 has primarily edited on Spanish Wikipedia. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:16, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, I didn't think it passed the duck test either, as the sources and descriptions are also different. I would've blocked the account otherwise. A 2nd opinion is more what I was thinking of. I'm just used to talking to other CUs about possible socking. INeverCry 21:23, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

I can definitely see what you are saying, LX. I have some theory that WikiDiego91 could have been hacking this account in question somehow. If that was the case, then an extension of WikiDiego91's block would be necessary if he hacked other people's accounts to re-upload this file. DLindsley (My talk page) 21:35, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Also, I've left Diego a note on his talk page. DLindsley (My talk page) 21:41, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

There is no reason at all to suspect hacking. Omateus11 continues to edit in Portuguese on Portuguese Wikipedia, a language never used by WikiDiego91. This is simply a case of two people who don't understand or don't care about copyright copying the same non-free image from English Wikipedia to Commons to use on their respective projects. It happens all the time. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

I have left a note on Omateus's talk page suggesting to him that he read Commons:Licensing. DLindsley (My talk page) 22:59, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

I also just added to my note suggesting for him to read the project's scope as well. DLindsley (My talk page) 23:10, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Shahzado_Chachar

See edits of this user, please block--Motopark (talk) 18:07, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Self promotion only account. Indef.'ed main account and all socks. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:37, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Cloxy

Resolved

• User: Cloxy (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: He's uploading only pictures and videos containing advertisement, self-promotion, license violation (his clips are also available at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnWWZK1ozeZtU3UfOSi8b-Q under a non-free license) and providing no educational benefits - everything in the videos can be better presented with structured text.

Exonie (talk) 15:55, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Exonie, if a file is used, it is in scope. However, the license issue probably requires a change of license at source or a permission via OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

What if there's an edit war and I cannot remove the files from the wikipedia articles because he's putting them back? --Exonie (talk) 17:36, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Well, that's an issue you have to deal on Wikipedia, not here. Also if you report someone here, politeness requires that you inform him/her. I did it for you. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:38, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

I am capturing education videos on Bulgarian. My videos are with free license. I am talking on the whiteboard - there is no advertisements there. --Cloxy (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

There's a watermark and link to your website in the vids - that's advertisement. Besides, it's not the only issue as I have explained --Exonie (talk) 17:44, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

@Cloxy: Please do not upload files with watermarks. They could be removed by anyone, and it gives more works to us volunteers. As I said above, if your files wee published on YouTube before, could you either change the license at the source or send a permission following the procedure at COM:OTRS. Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

OK, I will capture next videos without watermark. YouTube license is "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)". I think it's OK. --Cloxy (talk) 18:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

No clear case of vandalism. Scope & copyright issues should be discussed in a DR. Changing status therfore to resolved --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:12, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

42.60.224.22

Resolved

• User: 42.60.224.22 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Persistent vandalism at Category:United States. Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 13:24, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

 Info this IP has been globalblocked 12 minutes after this is reported.

Anyway, blocking for a week. Resolved. — revi_msg 13:47, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

180.92.129.217

Resolved

• User: 180.92.129.217 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: persistent unconstructive editing

Buxtehude (talk) 16:04, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Done. Alan ^(talk) 22:05, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Orijentolog

Resolved

• User: Orijentolog (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Disruptive editing, based on looking at the user's contributions. I have reverted enough of the disruption by the user, but he had better not be engaging in an edit war.

DLindsley (My talk page) 00:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

UPDATE: He just told me what to do, however he is not an administrator. Please have a discussion with him. DLindsley (My talk page) 00:38, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment: DLindsley, see the contributions of Orijentolog closer. The user just removed the Interwiki links, because that are superseded by Wikidata. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:59, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment: @Amitie 10g, I left him an explanation here, he confused removing interwikis with vandalism. None of such removal is without further editing on Wikidata (I've made over 12,600 edits there). @DLindsley, just easy, no one is telling you "what to do", just constructive advices for future. Cheers. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 01:08, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Mmkay. Won't do this in the future (this is a legitimate/serious promise). DLindsley (My talk page) 01:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

It may be worthwhile if you ask an administrator or other experienced editor before making a report here for confirmation you're doing the right thing. Many of your reports have been unhelpful and could potentially result in an editor being blocked by accident. Nick (talk) 01:50, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

No admin action required. — revi_msg 12:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Rodrigo.Argenton

Resolved

• User: Rodrigo.Argenton (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Edit-warring hereafter warnings (he removed the warning on his talkpage).

Steinsplitter (talk) 14:14, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

I've reverted users talk page and left a note there. ~ Nahid ^Talk 15:16, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:01, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

2602:306:CC2E:EFB0:7009:BED1:CA6C:18E1

Resolved

• User: 2602:306:CC2E:EFB0:7009:BED1:CA6C:18E1 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Vandalizing other's talk pages.

We hope (talk) 20:14, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done, thanks for reporting! --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:18, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

And thank you for fixing things! We hope (talk) 20:19, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you also for the extra rights! We hope (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

محمد يوسف سليمان

Resolved

• User: محمد يوسف سليمان (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Keeps on uploading random logos as "own work".

DLindsley ^{Need something?} 01:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

 Blocked, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 10:57, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Joshddz104

Resolved

• User: Joshddz104 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Uploading copyright violations as "own work".

DLindsley ^{Need something?} 20:48, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

User warned, next time block. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:55, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Blocked because user is continuing. --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:19, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Joshddz104

 Done Above

• User: Joshddz104 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: This user has been uploading copyvios all day, after repeated notices and warnings. Most have already been deleted but the user is still uploading more.

EoRdE6 (talk) 21:20, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

• Someone took care of it above I see Thanks! EoRdE6 (talk) 21:21, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Jmdiogo

Resolved

• User: Jmdiogo (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: She just keeps on uploading copyright violations despite notices. She even ignored the final warning that Krd sent her as a result of the copyright violations. This and the fact, that she has uploaded nothing but copyright violations, including ones with no licenses, makes me feel that she should be blocked for a time.

DLindsley ^{Need something?} 18:14, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:45, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

152.26.51.96

Resolved

• User: 152.26.51.96 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Continuous vandalism of talk pages, like User talk:EoRdE6

EoRdE6 (talk) 19:29, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:42, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

2.62.44.243

Resolved

• User: 2.62.44.243 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: see difference history page .

Doalex (talk) 12:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Vicky4515

Pending

• User: Vicky4515 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Spambot. Uploading spam. All spam files from them so far have been nominated for deletion.

DLindsley ^{Need something?} 19:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 20:06, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

FritsHG

Resolved

• User: FritsHG (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: [28]

Jee 15:56, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Given the user a final warning, next time block. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:47, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Krishanseo5

Resolved

• User: Krishanseo5 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Four images uploaded, all spam.

NativeForeigner 토론 (talk) 07:04, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

global locked, images deleted. Giving an indef-block for autoblock. — Revi 17:22, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Chamelle67

Resolved

• User: Chamelle67 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: This user uploaded this image and used it for defamation on fr-wiki (on fr:Khouribga and fr:Lait de chamelle). I blocked him on fr-wiki, please block him here. Best regards,

Jules78120 (talk) 00:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done by Green Giant. Alan ^(talk) 02:11, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

LykaSanson

Resolved

• User: LykaSanson (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: This user has constantly uploaded copyright images despite warning [29] (Twinkle doesn't seem to work so couldn't pile on warnings), Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 10:27, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done Blocked, files deleted. Yann (talk) 10:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

180.253.122.150

Resolved

• User: 180.253.122.150 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: removes speedy tag at an obvious hoax image (see softpedia.com for proper image)

Sjö (talk) 13:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done Blocked, file deleted. Yann (talk) 14:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Ebbx

Resolved

• User: Ebbx (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Promotional account. All of the users uploads are promotional and need deleting.

Alan Liefting (talk) 05:00, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 05:24, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

94.213.150.247

Resolved

• User: 94.213.150.247 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: I just removed a personal attack on File:Districtsbeker2008.PNG. It was put there in 2012, so it's a bit late to do something about the IP-address now, but as the attacked person is still mentioned in the history of the file I wanted to check if the history should be hidden like I have seen on other projects. With regards, Cycn (talk) 08:48, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:59, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

AlexanderCamacho14, Rodrigo Cardenas 720...

Hi, I blocked AlexanderCamacho14 (talk · contribs), Rodrigo Cardenas 720 (talk · contribs), and 187.161.65.44 (talk · contribs) for repeated vandalism on File:Jonathan Alexander Manzanares Camacho..jpg. I also semi-protected this page for a month. A CU is certainly in order. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:51, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Aside from passing the duck test, the initial blocks of these 2 accounts generated only one autoblock. I've switched to indef blocks for these VOA socks. INeverCry 20:14, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

2620:0:1000:437C:F966:A6C:E775:7243

Resolved

• User: 2620:0:1000:437C:F966:A6C:E775:7243 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: DR/speedy tag vandalism.

DLindsley ^{Need something?} 20:03, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done Holiday until the new year. ;oD Yann (talk) 20:22, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

OliverLyden

Resolved

• User: OliverLyden (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Nonsense image uploaded for vandalism use on the Danish Wikipedia.

DLindsley ^{Need something?} 03:24, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 04:03, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

70.190.229.97

Resolved

• User: 70.190.229.97 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Numerous invalid DRs and some vandalism. Already warned by Túrelio once.

DLindsley ^{Need something?} 16:12, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

IP blocked by Yann, so I'll be marking this as "Resolved". DLindsley ^{Need something?} 16:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

 Done Blocked, closed all DRs. Yann (talk) 16:30, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Lijingliang88926

Resolved

• User: Lijingliang88926 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Spam/advertising-only account.

Lanwi1(Talk) 09:51, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

User warned, all nominated for deletion. Yann (talk) 11:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

I'm not an admin, but Yann appears to have missed three of the user's uploads. I nominated those three uploads for deletion. DLindsley ^{Need something?} 16:51, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

 Done All uploads nuked and user blocked. User is also blocked on zhwiki for the same reason. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:02, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Silar

• User: Silar (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user

Deleting categories: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.
See in plWiki: pl:Wikipedysta:Silar = pl:Wikipedysta:46.174.26.245. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:50, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

 Done Blocked for a week. This was not his first block. Taivo (talk) 12:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Victorcolon

Resolved

• User: Victorcolon (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: This editor was blocked back in November for uploading copyright material, He's returned this year to simply upload more copyright images, Cheers, –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

 Done by Denniss. Yann (talk) 13:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Asiflfc

Resolved

• User: Asiflfc (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Nonsensical deletion request of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steve Staunton with Older brother Giz.jpg.

DLindsley ^{Need something?} 13:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Actually the original DR was probably not appropriate. Both deleted. Yann (talk) 13:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

 Comment But maybe the photo should be deleted anyway as out of scope and uploader's request? This is his/her only upload, maybe (s)he does not know, how to behave? Taivo (talk) 14:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Йайценюк Арсеній Петрович

Resolved

• User: Йайценюк Арсеній Петрович (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Vandalism.

Permjak (talk) 20:54, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

I am not an admin, but the user has been blocked indefinitely by Russavia. Therefore,  Done. DLindsley ^{Need something?} 21:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

INeverCry

ResolvedNot vandalism --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

• User: INeverCry (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: user deleted file File:OmniaHD.jpg This file was found on flickr, where posted under CC BY-SA 2.0 license. Direct link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/james_nash/3284560392/in/photolist-61fenA-61ff31-89Y5rZ-61jBkG-6DPzTd-6ZfzXU-8QvMu6-6ZbyGK-5VK4z4-9qkfNt-6ZbCbp-6ZbBDF-6ZfAVj-6ZbANB-6ZbB8X-6ZfAyQ-cJgX5J-9qkfLT-cJgWMs-7wq1aJ

I cant find same image in google, so looks like flickr user posted his own work. I dont have idea, why User:INeverCry deleted image, he didnt bother to explain his position and solution. Please restore image in subject if its posible. Thank You. Cap1000 (talk) 11:03, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

The subject of that photo seems to be a proprietary user interface with non-free, copyrighted icons which the Flickr user does not have the right to license. As there are thousands of copyright violations uploaded every day that have to be deleted by a handful of administrators, there isn't enough time to explain the rules individually to everyone who doesn't bother to read the existing explanations such as those at Commons:Licensing, Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Screenshots. Is there a particularly good reason why you would assume bad faith and jump to the conclusion that an experienced administrator is engaged in vandalism? —LX (talk, contribs) 11:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

The photo is derivative work of copyrighted content. INeverCry acted correctly, deleting the photo. Taivo (talk) 14:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

You really want us to take action against an administrator over a deletion? Really?? The subject has been asked to take action here. DLindsley ^{Need something?} 15:21, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

The problem is not about reporting on an admin. The problem is misusing this page with bogus claims of vandalism. Should an admin actually incurr in vandalism, this is the proper venue, and surely actions are expected to be taken against it. -- Tuválkin ✉ 13:54, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

 Comment This image was tagged for speedy deletion by a license reviewer, and I deleted it as a copyvio per COM:DW. No vandalism occurred. @Cap1000: In future you should ask the deleting admin on his/her talkpage about any deletions you think may have been mistaken. INeverCry 17:27, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

John Malfoy

Resolved

• User: John Malfoy (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: User is consistently vandalizing by overwriting images.

The Haz _talk 02:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

I was putting better images. John Malfoy (talk) 02:49, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

The user seems to be dealing with namely:

• File:Dave & Buster's video arcade in Columbus, OH - 17910.JPG
• File:Lake mapourika NZ.jpeg
• File:Canoagemcanada.jpg
• File:Teletica logo.jpg

The Haz _talk 03:40, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

@Hazmat2: blocked indefinitely by Materialscientist now! Holger1959 (talk) 06:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

if someone is interested: this list shows the vandalism effect (all images between 02:36 AM and 05:57 AM!) Holger1959 (talk) 07:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Fantastic! The Haz _talk 17:35, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Ripon Cathedral Rood Screen, Nth Yorkshire, UK - Diliff.jpg

Unprotect for replace in 2-nd row en to es in description this fie or correct by administrator.-- Володимир Ф (talk) 08:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

 Fixed --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks!-- Володимир Ф (talk) 09:01, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Vania11031

Pending

• User: Vania11031 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Uploaded an image of himself to use it for vandalism on the Russian Wikipedia.

DLindsley ^{Need something?} 20:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

VorteXLP

Pending

• User: VorteXLP (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Abusive DR. The {{Speedy}} stating "dupe (F8)" and "abuse (G3)" was later reverted as INUSE. That's actually the attack vector here. –Be..anyone (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Suspect video

Re: File:Laminoplasty-and-Laminectomy-Hybrid-Decompression-for-the-Treatment-of-Cervical-Spondylotic-pone.0095482.s001.ogv (found with [30]).

The video on this page was blocked the Java security in my computer.

I was searching for "cervical" laminectomy, referring to cervical vertebrae. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cramosm (talk • contribs)

No problem for me. Yann (talk) 14:25, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Some web browsers (e.g. Safari, WebKit) require Java to play ogv/webm videos. It sounds like your Java installation has been misconfigured to block the Wikimedia video plugin. -FASTILY 02:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Suspect video

Re: File:Laminoplasty-and-Laminectomy-Hybrid-Decompression-for-the-Treatment-of-Cervical-Spondylotic-pone.0095482.s001.ogv (found with [31]).

The video on this page was blocked the Java security in my computer.

I was searching for "cervical" laminectomy, referring to cervical vertebrae. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cramosm (talk • contribs)

No problem for me. Yann (talk) 14:25, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Some web browsers (e.g. Safari, WebKit) require Java to play ogv/webm videos. It sounds like your Java installation has been misconfigured to block the Wikimedia video plugin. -FASTILY 02:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Draco Smith

Resolved

• User: Draco Smith (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Long term banned user at enwiki who puts pictures of ceiling fans in pages. See contribs and en:User:David Beals and enwiki ANI archive. Johnuniq (talk) 01:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

 Done Blocked & tagged, all overwrites history cleaned, target images protected. INeverCry 02:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Mondolkiri1

Pending

• User: Mondolkiri1 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: This user constantly edits maps with very questionable changes without reaching, or even attempting to reach, a consensus. Then if his edits are reverted, which is almost always the case, he continues edit warring and rather than providing his own sources, he demands sources from other users. (as per File:ESC 2015 Map.svg and File:Eurasian Economic Union (2014).svg) After giving up on edit warring with the files, he then uploads his own POV version of the map and starts replacing them on different language Wikipedias. The user did this a couple of months ago with maps of countries of the Nordic Council, in which he edit warred on the original maps and then made his own versions which were all later deleted. He is now doing this again with the maps of the Eurasian Economic Union, while at first he tried to edit the original maps File:Eurasian Economic Union (2014).svg, File:Customs Union of Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia (orthographic projection).svg, File:Eurasian Economic Union (orthographic projection) - Crimea disputed.svg, he is now making his own POV maps and adding them to different Wikipedias File:Unión Euroasiática-2015.svg, File:Map of the Eurasian Union.svg. This user is already blocked on the English Wikipedia for this type of behavior and he has already received multiple warnings on Wikimedia Commons, however he still continues with his disruptive edits. I am sick of this user editing without consensus and POV pushing with his maps. Leftcry (talk) 04:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

I haven't broken the 3RR rule in any of those cases. Concerning to the changes in the Map of the Eurasian Union.svg, and I ignore any rule preventing adding different maps in other Wikipedias. I used this source: http://www.worldbulletin.net/economy/152032/eurasian-economic-union-begins-today . I thought it would be more informative, but I won't change the maps further, since I don't consider those changes as such an important issue, given that Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan are only potential members (as Tajikistan is, and this country is already shaded in a different colour, so I used the same logic as it had been used for Tajikistan). I think that if Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan are not shaded in a different (lighter colour), neither should be Tajikistan, in any map, but this particular issue is open to discussion. I don't disagree with this approach concerning to the map, where only current and acceeding members are coloured. Nevertheless, as I said, according to the informations I've consulted, then I guess it makes no sense to display Tajikistan in a different colour either (either in these ones or in other files). Concerning to ESC 2015 Map.svg, I used the same logic as, e.g., Cyprus, where Northern Cyprus is not displayed in a different colour (since both are non-UN members and both have limited recognition). As I learned later, Kosovo has already participated in some Eurovision events, so I think the map is correct now (therefore, I didn't do any further changes on that map, obviously. I admit that I commited the mistake of making the changes without discussing them in the talk pages, but most changes in the maps are done without any discussion, anyway. If I'm allowed, in further map changes, I'll present the sources supporting the changes not only in the articles but also in the explanation of the change. Mondolkiri1 (talk) 22:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Concerning to the Nordic Council countries, I only reverted once in the case of Denmark. I haven't reverted anything else, apart from a couple of self-reverts in the case of Sweden. And I didn't edit those maps since then.Mondolkiri1 (talk) 22:53, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Gripweed

Resolved

• User: Gripweed (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: [32] and [33].

DLindsley ^{Need something?} 22:14, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

• Neither of those edits qualify as vandalism. Some of Gripweed's comments might be out of line, but I see nothing that warrants a block. If you wish to further address this user I suggest creating a thread at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. Tiptoety ^talk 23:17, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Dbigcargon

Resolved

• User: Dbigcargon (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Obvious sock of David Beals (talk · contribs) overwriting images associated with Mohonk Mountain House with cceiling fan images. Acroterion (talk) 03:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 04:12, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

BarrettProductions

Resolved

• User: BarrettProductions (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: User seems to have confused Commons with a personal blog or a space for self-promo (see his user page). He's uploading some files produced by him looking like personal diatribes and nonsenses; IMHO not usable for the project scope. He created also a pair of (deleted) categories (this and this other). Btw, to use (again) the words of Jameslwoodward: Out of scope. Personal political diatribe. Also violates Commons rule against setting type in images. --Dэя-Бøяg 23:14, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

 Done Uploads nuked, user blocked. INeverCry 23:20, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for attention :-) . --Dэя-Бøяg 23:24, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

ديفيد_عادل_وهبة_خليل_2

Resolved

• User: ديفيد_عادل_وهبة_خليل_2 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Removing useful content from galleries and categories, no explanation as to why. Also redirecting galleries to categories with the reason: "category has more files"

EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 07:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Blocked for three days (user is indef blocked on arwiki, but i can't read the reason because i don't speak ar. Googe translator don't help.) See also User talk:ديفيد_عادل_وهبة_خليل_2#Stop_redirecting_galleries_to_categories. @EoRdE6: can you please help with cleaning up? --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:34, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Google translates the block reason (كان حساب مؤقت) to "Was a temporary account", presumably of ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:18, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Nikhit96

Resolved

• User: Nikhit96 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Obvious sockpuppet of User:Nikhit Reddy. Matched pair of copyvio uploads of variants File:Auto Cognizance 2k15 Logo.jpg & File:Auto Cognizance logo.jpg.

Bazj (talk) 12:13, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 21:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Weaver Lightning

Resolved

• User: Weaver Lightning (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Another David Beals sock, changing existing files. Please block, thanks.

NawlinWiki (talk) 16:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:34, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

kwameghana

Resolved

• User: Kwameghana (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: This is not a vandalism issue, i just want you to show me how I can become an admin.

Thank you Kwameghana (talk) 18:30, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

If you couldn't find Commons:Administrators and couldn't find a better place to ask for directions than the Vandalism noticeboard, you're probably not ready to become an administrator. Far too few contributions and recently deleted uploads are further nails in the coffin. Sorry, —LX (talk, contribs) 19:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

42.66.239.134

Resolved

• User: 42.66.239.134 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Vandalism.

4028mdk09 (talk) 12:56, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

 Done Blocked. Yann (talk) 13:19, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

194.199.37.18

Resolvedblocked for one month. Materialscientist (talk) 00:19, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Vandal /St1995 22:25, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

IP :87.17.14.144

Resolved

• User: 87.17.14.144 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Continous removing templates during Deletion requests.Kacir (talk) 19:13, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:15, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Continuation by IP 87.17.14.144. Thank you.--Kacir (talk) 11:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Blocked User:Crasha for two weeks because of this and the ongoing copyvio issues. Clearly identified itself at Kacir's talk page. --Denniss (talk) 13:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

5.56.186.194

Resolved

• User: 5.56.186.194 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Signature faking.

Leyo 16:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done and i deleted the DR. Looks like a LTA (sock/metapuppetry). --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Messina from de wiki, he's whining over there that his "properly sourced" files where deleted but those "inappropriately licensed" from Xocolatl were not. Seems to live in his own small world.--Denniss (talk) 17:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Tetra_quark

Resolved

• User: Tetra_quark (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: see recent uploads from user

Sigwald (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Blocked indef, uploads reverted by me and other admins. Looks like revanche foul for block at en wiki. --Denniss (talk) 17:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Thesmokedetector

Resolved

• User: Thesmokedetector (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Sockpuppet of globally-blocked User:David Beals.

Acroterion (talk) 17:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done Эlcobbola _talk 17:46, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, can you delete the image so that the next sockpuppet will at least have to re-upload it? Acroterion (talk) 18:08, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

72.15.24.129

Resolved

• User: 72.15.24.129 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: vandalism

Thanks. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:00, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done Blocked for a week. Taivo (talk) 18:11, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

197.83.246.10

Resolved

Only vandalism /St1995 19:11, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:12, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

StefanStern94‎

Resolved

• User: StefanStern94‎ (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Create only pages outside of the project scope (fake articles) with pictures, is now block in the German Wiki[34], please block also here. regards --Pitlane02 _talk 08:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:06, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Mrbean4200

Resolved

• User: Mrbean4200 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Corsswiki vandal also active at enwiki in the article en:Marc Dutroux. Here he uploaded the file:bsmark.jpg (now deleted after my request) to add in the article about Dutroux (see his last edits), that he's vandalizing from December with a series of nonsense (see: this "bsmark" by an anon, and after this, this, and this. As explained in the WP report page against vandalism, the user is clearly not here to do a real work. Anyway, I also suspect that this insistence of "bsmark", also in the description of this file, could be something related to his real intent: I suspect that the user is trolling the unknown skier depicted in the file (absolutely not resembling to Dutroux in any way), using Wikipedia and Commons. And IMHO also violating the COM:IDENT policy. Btw, there are imho sufficient reasons to request an indef ban. --Dэя-Бøяg 15:25, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done Vandalism-only account. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:28, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanx. And btw, the user was also blocked at enwiki :-) . --Dэя-Бøяg 15:40, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

TScreen group

Resolved

• User: TScreen group (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Replaces the file information (File:TS004.jpg) on false.

KAV777 (talk) 15:25, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

I protected the file for a week and closed all his deletion requests speedily. I did not block him/her yet, but I will, if (s)he continues. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done TScreen group continued uploading copyvios and got blocked for a week, then started socking and using bad language and got blocked forever. Taivo (talk) 18:35, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

72.15.24.129

Resolved

• User: 72.15.24.129 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Vandalism.

Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:39, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

I have just warned him with {{Test2}}. Please report again if he continues vandalising. Thanks. Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 15:43, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

 Blocked and hidden to revisions because of grossly insulting. Ip was blocked previously. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:54, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

204.28.99.2

Resolved

• User: 204.28.99.2 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Recurring vandalism.

Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:16, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done by Marcus Cyron --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:31, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

This guy seems really not to like us ;). Marcus Cyron (talk) 17:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Caidin2015

Resolved

• User: Caidin2015 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Just look at the contributions list. User used to post the same crap on Wiktionary, once without logging in (see wikt:aword).

Keφr (keep talk here) 11:44, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done VOA blocked, edits reverted, and trash uploads deleted. INeverCry 20:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

What is COM:VOA? Never mind. Keφr (keep talk here) 20:43, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

For the sake of any other readers, 'vandalism only account'. Revent (talk) 13:30, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

微醺2002

Resolved

• User: 微醺2002 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Vandalism-only account, uploaded some porn images.

Lanwi1(Talk) 09:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Uploads nuked, user blocked. INeverCry 09:13, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Dick657Tap

Resolved

• User: Dick657Tap (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Paul Easter (User:SEFPRODUCTIONS) sock again. Please block and delete the upload, thanks.

NawlinWiki (talk) 21:19, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Blocked along with sleeper User:Davekipps34. INeverCry 22:23, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Improper use of a private photograph

Pending

I wish to complain that a photograph has been used File:Newmore_Castle_2008.JPG ‎(480 × 360 pixels, file size: 72 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg) This was taken without my permission and from my private garden and is now available for all to use as copyright has been removed. This is a contravention of my rights as owner. How do I obtain its removal as the building is in an unsafe condition and is in a private garden and public access must be avoided. My husband and I have owned this property for very many years. I have issues with the person who thought it was ok to publish as this is clearly not the case without my permission - perhaps you would be kind enough to forward this to him and he would contact me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎81.149.156.56 (talk • contribs)

@QuintusPetillius: Anything to say? Regards, Yann (talk) 12:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

The image is in use on WP:EN illustrating the article on the building. I'm not sure you have grounds to demand the removal of the image. No copyright issues are involved and I don't think that Scottish law gives you, as owner of an ancient building, the right to control images of the building. The law might give you the right in Germany, but not in most common law countries. You may have a case for trespass against the photographer, but that does not affect the use of the image here.

In any event, if it turns out that Scottish law would demand the removal of this image on the owner's request, it is well established WMF policy that the demand cannot be made by an anonymous IP user. It must be made by someone who actually identifies herself (in private) to an OTRS volunteer and establishes her connection with the building to the satisfaction of the volunteer. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Sisagester/125.41.136.57

Resolved

• User: Sisagester (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user and 125.41.136.57 (talk · contribs)
• Reasons for reporting: He constantly change the information of files I uploaded. I know that common files are free and modifiable. But he puts wrong websites on the "source" in Summary section over and over again, even I undo it so many times. Firstly, the site he wrote is under copyright protection. Secondly, it's not where the picture comes from. He keep on changing the source site, ignoring my "undo" actions. What he trying to do is to prompt his website. I think it's very bad and destructive to wikipedia. And I don't know how many times should I undo the modifications until he stops. Files he changes: Lb-asphalt-plant-structure.jpg, Asphalt plant for construction.jpg etc....

Wikisay (talk) 07:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

OMG, he is doing it again, and I found that he also changes other users' files in the same way. [File:Asfaltinstallatie met paralleltrommel.jpg],[File:Asphaltmischanlage Gesamtansicht.jpg]. Ivyzhang214 is his sockpuppet, also IP: 125.41.79.101. Can you help blocking him?

Wikisay (talk) 02:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Now, I found that he changed the licensing information: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Lb-asphalt-plant-structure.jpg&action=history you can see it in the history. Section (int:license-header) I've changed it back "for now". And now I'm sure I can call him vandalism. Wikisay (talk) 03:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Warned and all uploads nominated for deletion. I seriously thought about blocking both (Sisagester and Wikisay) for edit warring, so be warned. --Didym ([[User talk:|talk]]) 06:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

@Didym: Thanks, man. I'm sorry, I admit that I fight him back and that's not proper. But I was too angry. And he continues doing it, I don't know what else to do. I sincerely accept the warning, like I accpet all good modifies and advises. But now I need to change them to the way before valdal, which is not intending to keep the edit war. Best Regards.----Wikisay (talk) 06:59, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Varsity_Walnut

ResolvedIndeffed, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 02:29, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

• User: Varsity_Walnut (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Long term abuse

Ian.thomson (talk) 02:27, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Hsbdfnrndnd

Resolved

• User: Hsbdfnrndnd (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Cross-wiki vandalism, LTA

Ian.thomson (talk) 02:39, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 02:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Bugdom_Dragonfly

Resolved

• User: Bugdom_Dragonfly (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: LTA, as with last two reports

Ian.thomson (talk) 02:47, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 02:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Sehfhfnfhhrjf

Resolved

• User: Sehfhfnfhhrjf (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: LTA again. Probably need page protection for the file.

Ian.thomson (talk) 02:55, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 03:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Michael_Rosoft

Resolved

• User: Michael_Rosoft (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Same as previous reports, LTA, imitation of User:Mike Rosoft. Also need to delete his upload File:AcventImage.jpg.

Ian.thomson (talk) 02:38, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 03:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Sisagester

Resolved

• User: Sisagester (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Like I reported some days ago, this user Sisagester won't stop changing the sources where other users' files come from. Even after he was warned by administrator. Please check: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Asphaltmischanlage_Gesamtansicht.jpg&action=history

By the way, he also upload pictures with the same source and advertise it on the wikipedia, all the edits is done under his IP addresses. I don't think this user will stop hacking others' file until he is blocked. Best Regards.---- Wikisay (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Now indef blocked for uploading copyvios and vandalizing file description pages after warnings and a previous block. --Didym (talk) 10:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Returnnew and sockpuppets

Resolved

• User: Returnnew (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• User: Unsulupilus (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• User: Charliewolf79 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• User: Acus010 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Crosswiki vandal-only account based on edits related to Bruce Lee and similar. Still banned at enwiki as Charliewolf79 and Returnnew (see the SPI case archive). Anyway, here Charliewolf has no edits but Returnnew did several vandalisms: on this file he uploaded twice a new version, any time rollbacked by Denniss, he uploaded several copyvio files despite any warning (see his talk or this examples), recreated deleted content continuing to post links and promotional text after warnings (just see), etc. Following the Global account info, I've found that Returnnew was banned also on itwiki (as sp of Charliewolf), created this page using this file uploaded here by Unsulupilus, and is doing this kind of work in almost all the wikis in which he is contributing. Same thing for Charliewolf (blocked also on dewiki and itwiki). Also Unsulupilus was blocked on itwiki as sp of Charliewolf. Acus010, that has no contribs here, was linked in the SPI of Charliewolf as evident SP. For all the reason shown, the continuos copyvio, the abuse of Wikimedia Project's wikis as a soapbox for pages related to Bruce Lee and Concord Production: I request an indef ban for the user and all the sp as soon as possible. Note: due to the gravity of the vandalisms (repeated copyvio after several warnings, spam, sockpuppetry, usage of lesser controlled wikis -as incubator- to work undisturbed), could it be the case to block the users globally? Thanks for attention. --Dэя-Бøяg 20:48, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: searching for user's career, I discovered this CU request on itwiki (look, Unsulupilus is confirmed), and this page. Final note: the user "Mechagoji75", added some minutes ago by JohnBlackburne at the SPI page, is not registered here. --Dэя-Бøяg 20:59, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

 Done Returnnew, Unsulupilus, and Acus010 are Confirmed as connected to each other. I've blocked them. I've also blocked Charliewolf79 per the cross-wiki blocks, etc, just to be safe. I don't see any other socks/sleepers. INeverCry 22:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: I've posted this on CU-L so stewards can consider if global locking is needed. INeverCry 22:11, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Note 2: I can sufficiently understant Italian, as Spanish, to see that this text I've removed is pure trolling against JohnBlackburne, along with threats to do something as get angry (!) and contact personally Wikipedia (?) if someone dare to defend him. There are also included other threats to the same user in broken English. In the same text he admits that his cousin Charliewolf is him. Here (as Unsulupilus) he talks about an edit war for strange reasons (lying) at en:Concord Production Inc. about a video file (this one). I discovered that the page is continuously vandalized by anons and sp of the user (still now, at this moment), and was still protected. It's unbelievable that a user ignoring any policy about copyright, any netiquette, trolling, sending legal (and illegal) threats, mockin' and lying to several serious users that tried to follow and help him, using lesser controlled Wikimedia pages to do whatever he wants; continued to vandalize and lie with this impudence, using systematically cyberbullying. Btw, I repat, it could be considerable to think to a global ban. And about the threats to JohnBlackburne, I'll report 'em to it. Due to its nationality (Italian), threats and repeated cyberbullying, i know that it could be the possibility to notice this to a unit named Polizia Postale e delle Comunicazioni (Postal and Communications Police). Thanks a lot for your interventions and for the report to the stewards. --Dэя-Бøяg 23:03, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Just to add a final note, about this itwp page I linked above, admins added other links to the same kind of threats, repeated also there. Something as how dare you idiots, I put upside-down Wikipedia and similar. Each comment is superfluous, thanks for the rapidity of global ban. --Dэя-Бøяg 00:14, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Caarl 95

Pending

• User: Caarl 95 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: charge images, above the other, and not specific licenses that inserts, and continuous edit wars (council Global Lock)

82.50.39.138 20:53, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

MichaelMaggs

Resolved

MichaelMaggs (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user

Vandalism and admin abuse on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:State Emergency Service of Ukraine (MChS) Mil Mi-8MTV picking up water near Nezhin.jpg. Caveat: You cannot actually execute it, it has to be handled on m:Steward requests/Permissions based on a community consensus. –Be..anyone (talk) 01:45, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Maybe INeverCry and Dschwen also want to comment on this. I personally consider the whole action to be blatant nonsense. --Didym (talk) 01:57, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

This is the vandalism AN, and this case doesn't look like vandalism. For user problems, there is COM:AN/U, and for requests for de-adminship COM:DEADMIN.    FDMS  4    02:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

And see community opinion here. That page can be simply deleted. Jee 01:17, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

I closed this as per above comments. Yann (talk) 09:46, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

79.2.2.146

• Resolved
• 79.2.2.146 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Block evasion of returnnew and sp. The same ip was blocked on wikipedia for a week (see the block log). Anyway, 2 edits on this file, only edited by Unsulupilus. So, it seems to be a static IP... I would suggest a long block. Uhm, just another request: due to the fact that this file was created by a globally banned user and has been used for edits (or better vandalisms) as this, this, this, this, this etc... is it possible to speedy delete it? As you can see, it was used only for vandalisms. Thanks a lot for attention. --Dэя-Бøяg 02:17, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

 Done IP and new sock User:Geronimoaug blocked. INeverCry 02:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks a lot :-) . --Dэя-Бøяg 02:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

• Block evasion: Is it possible to delete this talk and revoke its access to the user? Yet another trolling and delirium: for the user a global ban is a spite between buddies who get angry, or something similar. And again the same script: lies, dramatic excuses (as every time after a ban) with oaths to repair, the wish to start again with the same damages we have seen and partly repaired, and so on. Sincerely, this way to mock the entire foundation project, still now, is unacceptable. Along with the usage of Commons as a "sorting shed" for that files. As said, the IP is static, along with 82.55.165.94. A very long block for both the IPs, or better a global ban, is IMHO the only solution. Thanks for attention. --Dэя-Бøяg 15:23, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:00, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. --Dэя-Бøяg 23:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Unidentified subjects

ResolvedNo admin action needed

Hi, vandalism on this caregory page (see [35]) by an IP -- Christian Ferrer 06:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for reporting. That was reverted by Jkadavoor. Apparently there is no other measure to be taken as reverting solves the problem for now. Cheers.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 23:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

125.41.29.166

Resolvedblocked, reverted. Materialscientist (talk) 09:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

• User: 125.41.29.166 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: This is IP of user Sisagester, I reported many of his IPs in wikipedia today because of Disruptive Editing, now his IPs are blocked in wikipedia. However, he continues vandalizing my file description pages in wikimedia again, just as why his account is blocked now. Can you help blocking his IPs, this is really endless....

Wikisay (talk) 09:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment: Your file description pages? Unless your mean your user page or others under it, you should read COM:OWN again. Also, please note that this is Wikimedia Commons, a Wikimedia project, not just “wikimedia”, and that what you’re refering to as just “wikipedia” is the English Wikipedia (one of many), also a Wikimedia project. (As for the reported vandalism, it is spam and should be reverted and blocked, of course — no qualms there.) -- Tuválkin ✉ 12:11, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment: Meh. Perfectly reasonable to say "my file description pages" rather than "the file description pages of files I have uploaded." - Jmabel ! talk 16:16, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment: Thanks for making it clear for me. I'm always comfused about the relationship between wikimedia commons and wikipedia. However I know that files in commons are public and free to modify in good purpose, and I did use imprecise expression without noticing it:). Anyway, thanks for all the helps.

Posts of inappropriate personal information

Resolved

• User: 磯部真優デモクラシー (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: w:ja:LTA:ISECHIKA. Posts of inappropriate personal information. (Requested oversight)

kahusi (會話) 13:41, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Blocked, uploads deleted, logs hidden & edit summary rev deleted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. This text also request： "File:(hide).JPG" from Commons:Deletion requests/Breach of privacy20150325. --kahusi (會話) 16:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. --kahusi (會話) 16:40, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Another IP of user Sisagester

‎123.6.199.250

Resolved

• User: ‎123.6.199.250 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: This is another IP of user Sisagester (talk · contribs), who is blocked for vandalizing file description pages. Also his IP(125.41.29.166) is blocked for three months just a few days ago. Now he comes back. I think this is a very serious problem that he so disrespect others' effort and won't stop it after warnings and warnings.

Wikisay (talk) 08:52, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

 Done Could you please change the source link as I did in File:DHB-asphalt-drum-mix-plant.jpg, add categories, and ask for license review with a {{LicenseReview}} template? Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

OK, I have listed the direct links for each file, and left the {{LicenseReview}} template. I'm not very familiar with this. Please help me check it. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikisay (talk • contribs)

125.41.142.0

Resolved

• User: 125.41.142.0 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Dear @Yann: , this is another IP of Sisagester (talk · contribs), He deleted all the changes I did as you required. How can I avoid attacks from his other IPs?

Wikisay (talk) 00:57, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Reverted and blocked for 1 week. --Didym (talk) 01:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

IP of Sisagester

Resolved

• User: 115.60.168.132 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Vandalize files again. Please block.

Wikisay (talk) 00:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Blocked and reverted. @Wikisay: can you list the usually vandalized files, so we can protect them? --Didym (talk) 00:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

@Didym: Ok, these files are:File:Lb-asphalt-plant-structure.jpg,File:DHB-asphalt-drum-mix-plant.jpg,File:LB asphalt plant.JPG,File:Asphalt plant pic.jpg,File:Asphalt plant for construction.jpg.thank you very much, however these files had been protected before. Once the time is over, he will begin vandalizing them. I don't know if there is a permanent to avoid this. Anyway, thanks again.Wikisay (talk) 01:09, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

All protected for 3 months. --Didym (talk) 01:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

THANK YOU!Wikisay (talk) 02:09, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

What about blacklisting the spamvertized website? Or do they offer anything of use for Commons ? --Denniss (talk) 02:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

I've added it to the spam blacklist. The site has an ARR copyright statement at bottom that directly mentions all photos. INeverCry 03:12, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Forecar ford

Resolved

• User: Forecar ford (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: David Beals sock, the usual ceiling fan crap.

NawlinWiki (talk) 19:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

• •  Done Natuur12 (talk) 21:37, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Ihggvg

Resolved

• User: Ihggvg (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: More David Beals.

NawlinWiki (talk) 19:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

• •  Done Natuur12 (talk) 21:37, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Atvhayward

Resolved

• User: Atvhayward (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Obvious spammer.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done Yann (talk) 19:30, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Marfryd6360

Resolved

• User: Marfryd6360 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Questionable page moves.

Keφr (keep talk here) 18:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

 Comment Looks like a lost newbie. Some explanation in her/his language might help. Reverted and deleted. Yann (talk) 19:31, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Kagamine Rin 02

Resolved

• User: Kagamine Rin 02 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: User indulges in spamming and copyright violations. Can an admin please take care about that user?

CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 18:58, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done Undef. for spamming. Yann (talk) 19:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

202.176.202.135

Resolved

• User: 202.176.202.135 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Also 202.176.202.136 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user & 202.176.202.138 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user. Nonsense/trolling deletion requests directed at harmless shrubbery.

—Odysseus1479 (talk) 06:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done I already blocked 202.176.202.128/28 for a couple weeks after cleaning up the vandalism. INeverCry 08:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

God.ta35

Resolved

• User: God.ta35 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: add useless categories to some pages

Slick (talk) 06:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done Now I have blocked a god! Let us be atheists for 1 week. Taivo (talk) 08:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Jones771

 Done Materialscientist (talk) 00:45, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

• User: Jones771 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Sock of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS; please block and delete the usual Paul Easter headshot upload.

NawlinWiki (talk) 19:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Patricspike

Resolved

• User: Patricspike (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: inappropriate behavior (see contribs)

Stepro (talk) 14:20, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

• •  Done - blocked him indef. Thanks for reporting. Natuur12 (talk) 14:23, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

149.172.245.24

Resolved

• User: 149.172.245.24 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: removing DRs, most likely Messina

тнояsтеn ⇔ 08:41, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

an User:Thgoiter . Die Bilder sind über 100 Jahre alt. /The pictures are 100 years old, like many other pictures (with unknown authors) on commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.172.245.24 (talk • contribs) 08:45, 16. Apr. 2015‎ (UTC)

Die Löschanträge entscheidet ein Admin, nicht du. (DR are decided by an admin, not by you). --тнояsтеn ⇔ 08:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

siehe File:Burgplatz Essen, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Denkmal.jpg Ich habe Ihnen nicht das Du angeboten — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.172.245.24 (talk • contribs) 08:49, 16. Apr. 2015‎ (UTC)

Bitte Beiträge signieren. de:WP:Du. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 08:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:58, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Also see my comment here: [36]. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 08:59, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

& reverted :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:02, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

EMwiki9

Pending

• User: EMwiki9 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Persistent copyright violations, after multiple warnings.

WikiDan61 (talk) 17:10, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done Blocked, file deleted. Yann (talk) 17:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Fake meteorites

Pending

• User: GEOGOZZ (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Uploading pictures of fake meteorites, claiming they're real. Looks like an old tailpipe and some foundry slag so far.

Geogene (talk) 01:58, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

 Comment And also socking as Lostcitymeteor (talk · contribs). Yann (talk) 08:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

I nominated some of her uploads for deletion and closed two DR-s. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Charliewolf's new SP

Resolved

• User: Iurgens (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• User: Jonny9791 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: yet another block evasion of Charliewolf79, recognized as SP at enwiki (Jonny's contribs, Iurgens' contribs, SPI archives 1 April and 21 April). Jonny9791 has no contribs, Iurgens uploaded this and this other versions of the File:Yin and Yang.svg (vandalizing a highly used file that should be protected). Look at the 1st Yin-Yang upload, is the logo of the Concord Production (one of the scopes of the vandal). To indef block as soon as possible and, who can, send a request (another) of global block for both of them. Thanks. --Dэя-Бøяg 01:42, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

I sent a request for global lock. --Dэя-Бøяg 02:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done - Users have been globally blocked on meta by Billinghurst. So the report could be considered resolved. --Dэя-Бøяg 03:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Mike B. Rosoft

Resolved

• User: Mike B. Rosoft (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Re-uploading existing files with images of ceiling fans. See this report. Also suggest monitoring new accounts made with the word "Rosoft".

discospinster (talk) 17:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

• Blocked by me and locked by Vito. Natuur12 (talk) 18:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

• • Sadly this idiot will not stop vandalizing Commons and other projects. And as usual he's impersonating an existing user. Don't know if we can block similar named new users via filter. --Denniss (talk) 09:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Mat334

Resolved

• User: Mat334 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: All of this user's edits seem to target User:Muyo for some reason. Changed Muyo's page and added a strange image saying "Wikipedia is not yours", claiming Muyo made the image in question.

mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 01:21, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Could it be this guy? They seem to be having some kind of tiff over in :ja. mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 01:24, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Blocked, upload deleted. --Didym (talk) 01:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Yadirac9001

Resolved

• User: Yadirac9001 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Spam-only account, user is here to promote a Cuban restaurant. See the description below the 8 pictures he uploaded (01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08), unused and awaiting speedy deletion (tagged by me). Btw, user was also skilled to add the right (for spam) categories: Cuba, Food, Restaurants, Dinner... Also the one of an airport serving the province in which the restaurant is located. --Dэя-Бøяg 15:45, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Just to make an example of what is the kind of text in the descriptions, I report a phrase: We work every day in getting better the quality of our product. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 17:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done Advertising-only account --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Somedayzzz

Resolved

• User: Somedayzzz (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: clearly a vandalism only account, with no constructive edits.

Bidgee (talk) 09:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done Blocked undef. Yann (talk) 09:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Now back using Report2thamist (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user. Bidgee (talk) 09:49, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Idef blocked by Túrelio (talk · contribs). Bidgee (talk) 09:53, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

103.17.164.185

Pending

• User: 103.17.164.185 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Fake Russavia vandalism, some pages need to be Revdel as well.

Bidgee (talk) 04:39, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

197.76.130.111

Pending

• User: 197.76.130.111 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Vandalism

Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:16, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done Blocked for a day. Longer block will be done if vandalism continues. Yann (talk) 19:58, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

36.253.210.51

Resolved

• User: 36.253.210.51 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Nonsense vandalism.

Bidgee (talk) 01:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done Blocked for a day. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Trung Brown

Resolved

• User: Trung Brown (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Keeps reverting to weird fan image at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Graves_at_Arlington_on_Memorial_Day.JPG

OkuRaku (talk) 04:09, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, fans of Memorial Day buried under gravestones. Trung Brown (talk) 04:11, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

• Trung Brown hereby warned (and also on his talk page) that if he does this one more time he'll be blocked. - Jmabel ! talk 05:01, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
• I have reverted this and will revert the rest of his vandalism. At this point, I am assuming that all of his uploads over anyone else's image are vandalism. - Jmabel ! talk 05:06, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

.

Sorry Jmabel, I already blocked this user, it's a reincarnation of our valued ceiling fan vandal. Uploads nuked as well. :-) --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 05:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

AdamSchlaung

Resolved

• User: AdamSchlaung (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Based on his actions at the English Wikipedia, and based on his file uploads here, I think the user is just here to vandalize/disrupt the project. None of the uploads are ever going to be used and all have been nominated for deletion. In fact, he's nominating some of his own files now for deletion further adding to the disruption.

Only (talk) 09:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

KeithBlackD (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user probably needs to go with him. Only (talk) 09:46, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet and master blocked, uploads nuked. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 15:35, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Alexander Goldman

Resolved

• User: Alexander Goldman (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: It is David Beals the ceiling fan vandal

Apparition11 (talk) 14:40, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Blocked & file protected. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:43, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Scott Rowland

Resolved

• User: Scott Rowland (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Ceiling fans.

Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:21, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Blocked and tagged. I've cleaned the file's history and semi-protected it for a while. I also deleted the DR and rolled back the IP edits, as we don't need to give this sockmaster any extra attention. INeverCry 03:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Lead Gray

Resolved

• User: Lead Gray (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: See above threads.

   FDMS  4    16:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

@Thibaut120094: Please also hide the vandal's revisions.    FDMS  4    17:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

@FDMS4: Done. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Ferling_PR

Resolved

• User: Ferling_PR (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Upload lots of logos that can be found on the internet, see user talk page and contributions.

GY Fan★ 10:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

 Not done The images are monothematic and it is likely that we receive an OTRS permission for them, as it was previously. I do not see a reason to block here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankry (talk • contribs) 06:23, May 30, 2015‎ (UTC)

2.86.132.44

Resolved

• User: 2.86.132.44 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: IP continues changing the description regarding my own image, adding information that's not really required and biased. Image in question is here. Either block him or protect the page as the first edit was made on 18 April and I recently changed on 27 May although it seems they are watching the page so it would be better that the page is protected Luxure Σ 05:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Not vandalism, just edit warring.

Luxure, you do not 'own' the description, even if you uploaded the file, and you both need to discuss it on the talk page instead of you arbitrarily blanking the IP editors comments there. You should not be trying to have a discussion in edit summaries, especially one where you threaten another editor with blocking. You are both 'wrong' in your behavior, regardless of whose description is correct (and tbh, it should probably be described as the former flag, with the relevant dates, regardless of what else is mentioned). "Vandalism" is when a person is intentionally damaging things, not when they disagree about something but are acting in good faith.

Your claim to the copyright is probably bogus anyhow, since the exact same image was uploaded as a PNG in 2010 (merely changing an image from one format to another is not a creative act and does not create a copyright claim). Revent (talk) 05:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Revent, visit the "Macedonians (ethnic group)" page on wikipedia. The flag is referenced as the ethnic flag for these people, so the description is correct. Luxure Σ 05:42, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Luxure: Ah, fair enough, I was mixing up that design with this one based on a textual description. Still, the IP's edit aren't really 'vandalism', even if misguided, just a content dispute, and people should be warned on their personal talk pages, not in edit summaries. The drama should be hashed out on the image talk page, not in an edit war, and you were wrong when you blanked the IPs attempt to do so. What is the correct description should be decided by discussion and consensus (you do not own the file page, even if you own the copyright to the image), and if someone is attempting to act in good faith but still causing problems they should be taken to COM:AN/U, not here.... this board is for 'obvious' vandalism (like if they were changing it to 'flag of the penises' or something). Revent (talk) 05:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

It's just adding NPOV info, that's really not needed for an image, better suits an article. I will however undo my edit on the talk page. Luxure Σ 05:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Indeed, but it's not vandalism, it's just a content dispute/edit war. Don't war, talk it out, and ask for other opinions if needed to get consensus...then, if the IP keeps fighting about it, go to ANU. Revent (talk) 06:26, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

I protected the file File:Ethnic_Macedonian_Flag.svg for a week in hope to avoid an edit war. Macedonia is a hot topic right now. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 08:00, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks my favourite owl! Luxure Σ 11:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Owl? Right.... --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 22:27, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

@Hedwig in Washington: Harry Potter's owl is named Hedwig. INeverCry 23:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

That one. Gotcha. Thanks for waking me up! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 23:10, 2 June 2015 (UTC)