WFinch

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, WFinch!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

File:Neworleans.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Neworleans.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Prosfilaes (talk) 05:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Samuel Insull photo & TIME cover

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for the restoration work on the NPS copy -- and the detective work re its use on the cover of TIME. Good work! Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 00:06, 14 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Welles-Hayworth-Letters-1943.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Welles-Hayworth-Letters-1943.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 00:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Wolfe-Bitter-End.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Wolfe-Bitter-End.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 21:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Wolfe-Over-My-Dead-Body.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Wolfe-Over-My-Dead-Body.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 21:39, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Wolfe-Sisters-in-Trouble.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Wolfe-Sisters-in-Trouble.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 21:39, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Wolfe-Recipes-Cartoon.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Wolfe-Recipes-Cartoon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 21:39, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Wolfe-Fer-de-Lance.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Wolfe-Fer-de-Lance.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 21:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Wolfe-The-Red-Bull.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Wolfe-The-Red-Bull.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 21:41, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Wolfe-Too-Many-Cooks.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Wolfe-Too-Many-Cooks.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 21:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Wolfe-Bitter-End-1.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Wolfe-Bitter-End-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 21:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bots

You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

The simple solution is to simply include the "rawcontinue" parameter with your request to continue receiving the raw continuation data (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&rawcontinue=1>). No other code changes should be necessary.
Or you could update your code to use the simplified continuation documented at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Query#Continuing_queries (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&continue=>), which is much easier for clients to implement correctly.

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Category change

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Happy new year ! Do you know this tool ? Cheers, — Racconish^☎ 07:22, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I certainly didn't until now! I'll figure out how to use that — thanks a ton. I can't believe how many files you've created for these films, it's wonderful. — WFinch (talk) 14:51, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Vœux

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

		En route pour l'aventure !
		Bonne année WFinch ! Je te souhaite de belles découvertes En agréable compagnie ! Au plaisir de te croiser, Cordialement, — Racconish^☎ 12:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Seattle Times

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Can you explain why you removed Category:Seattle Times from File:Seattle Daily Times - big press - 1900.jpg and various other related files? Your summary gives no explanation, just says you are removing it with HotCat. - Jmabel ! talk 05:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi there — I removed it from files categorized under Category:Seattle and the Orient because that category is already a subcategory of Category:Seattle Times. — WFinch (talk) 14:50, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ah; I'll revert my edits of the files specific to the staff and operation of the Seattle Times newspaper. — WFinch (talk) 15:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Yes, it's an odd case where the fact that they published the book puts them somewhere up the hierarchy, but these photos are directly about them, and no one would normally think to go down that branch without a more direct inclusion. Thanks. - Jmabel ! talk 16:30, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Lobby cards

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I can leave them as is-thought what was important was that they aren't posters but lobby cards. We hope (talk) 16:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Okay good, thanks — I'll make a note to circle back to the lobby cards and create subcategories by year. — WFinch (talk) 16:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Punch Almanack

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Not sure why you recognize that the "Punch Almanack for 1885" was likely published in 1884 for File:1885 Punch three-volume-novel-parody Priestman-Atkinson.png‎, but refuse to recognize that the "Punch's Almanack for 1855" was likely published in 1854 for File:1855-daguerrotype-familyphoto-joke-Punch.gif. If you have specific information on the publication dates of those two volumes, that's fine; but if you don't, then the File:1855-daguerrotype-familyphoto-joke-Punch.gif edits are problematic. Churchh (talk) 08:39, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. Punch Volume 28 is dated 1855, so that's why I changed the date from 1854 when I found the illustration via HathiTrust. But I'm sure you're correct: in the bound volume, the Punch Almanack precedes the first issue of Volume 28 (January 5, 1855). I've changed the relevant categories from 1855 to 1854. — WFinch (talk) 15:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

PD-text

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

FYI, PD-text does not apply to 3D objects.[1] Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:54, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, and thanks for doing the cleanup of the file. — WFinch (talk) 12:56, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Kate Burton and Morgan Ritchie in The Corn is Green.jpg

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz 21:37, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Kate Burton and Morgan Ritchie in The Corn is Green.jpg

Yours sincerely, — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 22:12, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Farm Security Administration by US state categorization

Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Walter,
by checking my watchlist I have noticed that you have started creating subcategories of Category:Farm Security Administration and are sorting in images now. I'm sure that you do a good job in general and as a result are helping to push this project forward (as far as I can tell by some of your edits which appeared on my watchlist in the past) but I do doubt the usefulness and moreover the practicability of this category tree which you are creating here. Due to the fact that most of the photographs don't show the work of the Farm Security Administration itself but instead this collection mostly is a huge photo documentary series comprising of many different aspects of people's everyday life I doubt the adequacy of listing these pictures in a category labeled "Farm Security Administration" at all. I've run into a few pictures showing some FSA employees or buildings. In my opinion I would only list these ones in the FSA category.

I'm quite sure that you are aware that we have a lot more images. Category:PD US FSA/OWI lists some 9500 images because they have the {{PD-USGov-FSA}} so they are either FSA or Office of War information photographs. (I don't know who had the idea to mix them into one license template. Maybe this could be split up.) In addition we host quite some FSA images which are licensed as PD-USGov and therefore not listed into this category. I'm not sure If you are going to sort these presumably 15000 images, will you? I'm just telling you because I think you should know, that there is a pretty large-scale development project going on to improve the usability on Commons by developing very powerful features which will eventually make many of the intersection categories obsolete. This project is called Commons:Structured data. In the meantime performing an advanced search may be sufficient despite the fact that the current solution is not implemented in a user friendly way. --Zaccarias (talk) 20:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. My objective is to make it easy to understand the scope and impact of the New Deal in concrete terms; see Category:New Deal by U.S. state. Documentary photographs of everyday life are of considerable interest. But I'm not planning to categorize FSA images beyond those that are presently in Category:Farm Security Administration. I'm happy to hear that a project is under way to organize images that are in such massive categories. — WFinch (talk) 20:43, 17 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your immediate reply. Thinking of my own categorization work in the past with many hours performing tedious tasks I just wanted to tell you this. (Not everybody has to waste as much time on Commons working in a complicated manner as I did.) I hope you're not annoyed by my suggestions. If you want to find images you can perform search inquiries like typing hastemplate:"PD-USGov-FSA" insource:"Oregon" just in case you don't allready know this. With a little tryout some tasks can be done much more efficient. With a precise search operation you get pretty specific results. Then you may perform a sorting of them using Cat-a-lot directly on the search results page. --Zaccarias (talk) 21:04, 17 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the tip. I always seem to do things the hard way, but I'm done with that particular task now. Good luck with your efforts to make things easier to find here. — WFinch (talk) 21:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. Thanks for the job you did here. Best regards. --Zaccarias (talk) 04:45, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Time 1942

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Dear WFinch, please read the deletion request.--Maher27777 (talk) 13:36, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks—I did read the entry and added my comments that the category should be deleted. I see that the entry has been modified since, I'm not sure why. — WFinch (talk) 23:51, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Deletion requests

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Please contribute to deletion requests below:

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Frol Kozlov-TIME-1959.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aleksandr Nesmeyanov-TIME-1958.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anastas Mikoyan-TIME-1957.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nikita Khrushchev-TIME-1957.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nikita Khrushchev-TIME-1956.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nikolai Bulganin-TIME-1955.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Georgy Zhukov-TIME-1955.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nikita Khrushchev-TIME-1955.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kliment Voroshilov-TIME-1934.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joseph Stalin-TIME-1937.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Leon Trotsky-TIME-1937.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Konstantin Rokossovsky-TIME-1943.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aleksandr Vasilevsky-TIME-1943.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Filipp Golikov-TIME-1943.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vyacheslav Molotov-TIME-1940.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Semyon Timoshenko-TIME-1941.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Semyon Budyonny-TIME-1941.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joseph Stalin-TIME-1941.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Boris Shaposhnikov-TIME-1942.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maxim Litvinov-TIME-1942.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dmitri Shostakovich-TIME-1942.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Semyon Timoshenko-TIME-1942.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Georgy Zhukov-TIME-1942.jpg--Maher27777 (talk) 11:42, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

More files:

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Marshal Novikov-TIME-1944.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nikolai Voronov-TIME-1944.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vyacheslav Molotov-TIME-1943.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joseph Stalin-TIME-1945.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Andrei Gromyko-TIME-1947.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Andrei Zhdanov-TIME-1946.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karl Marx-TIME-1948.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vyacheslav Molotov-TIME-1946.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joseph Stalin-TIME-1940.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joseph Stalin-TIME-1943.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vasily Stalin-TIME-1951.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joseph Stalin-TIME-1950.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kremlin Courier-TIME-1951.jpg--Maher27777 (talk) 12:53, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for identifying all of those files. I've supported those deletion requests, and added one more: for File:Georgy Malenkov-TIME-1950.jpg — WFinch (talk) 15:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

File:Nunnally-Johnson-1939.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:08, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

The copyright tag was missing the closing brackets and it also contained a typo. It's corrected, now. Can I remove the tag, or will this be done otherwise? — WFinch (talk) 23:46, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Well, I've removed the tag myself, and I hope that's okay. — WFinch (talk) 23:51, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Princes Edward, Henry, and Albert Time cover 1927.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Dear WFinch..can you help me in saving this file?--Maher27777 (talk) 15:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. I believe User:Yann has resolved the question. I did prepare some comments but it was difficult to even find a place to put them since there was no deletion request. The source and copyright holder was Time and it was not renewed; and no separate copyright notice appears for the photograph, which would be required. — WFinch (talk) 16:14, 22 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Karl Freund.JPG

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Karl Freund.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rosenzweig τ 18:56, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Chapman & Hall

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

@WFinch: since you edited on that category I was wondering what the difference is with Category:Chapman & Hall books. I might have made a mistake but I am not too sure. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 15:03, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ah, thanks for adding the category "Chapman & Hall" to the "Chapman & Hall books" category, so it's nested within that family. Chapman & Hall also published All the Year Round, a magazine; I spent a lot of time organizing those images by year, so perhaps there could be a parallel category for magazines, now. I think the distinction is that the main Category:Chapman & Hall might also contain categories for the people who founded and ran the company, images of the company buildings, and company logos. Fortunately, there's already a subcategory for books—and I'd put Our Cruise in the Claymore into that subcategory. That's my take, anyway. — WFinch (talk) 15:48, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

@WFinch:

Done, and thanks! Lotje (talk) 16:00, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Peter Ustinov in 1987 and Category:Peter Ustinov in 1986

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@WFinch: could you take a look at the images? Looking at the clothes and little details, it seems like this and this file also date from 1986. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 16:11, 8 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I agree that those two images are almost certainly from the same sitting. I'd even categorized one of them as 1986, at first, but then I categorized them both as 1987 as dated by the creator/uploader. I do suspect they're from 1986, though, if all of those other photos are from 1986. — WFinch (talk) 16:30, 8 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Riverside Press

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I found this category: Category:Books published by Riverside Press and Riverside Press printed books for the Houghton Mifflin Company who were the publishers. To my understanding, if you are a publisher and you don't have a printer, you don't have any books.

I am going to just move the stuff from that category into the original category, but in a nice way. If you don't mind.... --RaboKarbakian (talk) 19:42, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Here's is the notice...

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have set the books up by year by using the following syntax: [[Category:Riverside Press| year]] The year being YYYY with a space in front of it so they don't all go under "1" alphabetically.

Further, I am going to make categories for all of the djvu files that are there. I like the title page for wikidata and I think it looks very respectable in the Infoboxen.

So, the notice will show you where to argue with its deletion, and if you win, my contributions will show what files to put back. (I don't really like these notices).--RaboKarbakian (talk) 19:57, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Books published by Riverside Press

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category:Books published by Riverside Press is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

Misleading category.

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

RaboKarbakian (talk) 19:57, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Communication

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Attempts have been made to communicate with you.

Is the failure mine?

I am working on a document from my state which has a list of books that were made available to our schools to fill their new libraries with. I think it is really cool. This "who is the publisher or not" stuff is just silliness. Many publishers appeared on that list.

All of these books also have images. Many have two sets of images. Some were (perhaps) stolen from England by those publishers. It is far more interesting to sort through them as they are than it is to have "problems" with doing that.--RaboKarbakian (talk) 00:04, 20 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Kate Wiggins died in 1856

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

That Kate Wiggins died in 1856 means that her books were probably first published before 1856. Subsequent versions of those books have been published after that.

That first publication probably had different images. Maybe no images.

Your Kate Wiggins texts category has an audio version in it.

For a positive exercise in categorization, try starting with Kate Wiggins works. Separate the audio from the texts. Try to put the book into the year it was published. Try to find out when the book was first published for the main category.

Are you helping s:User:Akme? If so. How are you helping?--RaboKarbakian (talk) 02:02, 20 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. Since the structure for the category Kate Douglas Wiggin (1856–1923) is in place, please recategorize individual files as you see fit. — WFinch (talk) 03:15, 20 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Not sure what the 'thank you' is for. It is easier and more accepted for you to revert your own edits. Also, quite possibly, you have messed things up elsewhere.--RaboKarbakian (talk) 20:46, 20 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Evelyn Nesbit in 1913

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I really doubt that File:Evelyn Nesbit Thaw by Bain News Service, 1913.jpg is a photograph of her in 1913. I think it's probably from around 1901–1902. She looked rather different by 1913. Perhaps the Bain News Service published it in 1913, but I'm pretty sure that is not the date of the photo. BarrelProof (talk) 18:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Yes—I've removed the year from the category. — WFinch (talk) 18:37, 21 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

It's a stunning picture – even if neglecting Nesbit herself, the shoes are amazing. BarrelProof (talk) 01:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

It sure is. After replying to your message I did a search through 1913 newspapers using the Library of Congress's "Chronicling America", hoping to find it published via Bain News Service. It would be great to identify the year the photo was taken and credit the photographer ... That search came up empty, though. But you never know, the information might turn up someday. — WFinch (talk) 02:58, 23 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Cradle-Mercury-1.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Cradle-Mercury-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2605:6001:E7C4:1E00:3C31:892B:FD3A:DB8A 04:36, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Harper's_Bazaar,_1922

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Harper's Bazaar, 1922 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:14, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category removal

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What is the reason for this category removal? It seems relevant and not duplicated as far as I can see. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:44, 13 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for catching that and letting me know. I've created a category for that file and others, and categorized it under "World War I homefront in the United States". That's a crowded category that I've been giving some attention, but I shouldn't have just removed it from that poster file without creating a subcategory. — WFinch (talk) 13:07, 13 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Funeral of Billy Spillers

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

You put this in a category related to Washington state. Photos say the funeral was at Arlington National Cemetery. Am I missing something, or was this just an error? - Jmabel ! talk 02:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Boy, that is a confusing one. It seemed like Arlington National Cemetery to me until I read the caption on this file: "U.S. Sailors salute Chief Navy Counselor Billy Spillers as his coffin is lowered into the ground during his funeral at Arlington Cemetery in Arlington, Wash., April 16, 2014. Spillers and three of his children died in a March 22, 2014, mudslide that struck his home and others in Oso, Wash., a rural community 55 miles northeast of Seattle." Spillers' memorial at Find a Grave has him buried in Washington state. — WFinch (talk) 03:17, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Oof. OK. I missed that! - Jmabel ! talk 16:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

So you are saying that the title & caption of File:U.S. Sailors fold a flag over the casket of Chief Navy Counselor Billy Spillers during his funeral April 16, 2014, at Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Va 140416-N-MM360-070.jpg are wrong? - Jmabel ! talk 16:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

(Based on a Google search, I bet you are correct, and they are wrong. Want to fix that, or should I?) - Jmabel ! talk 16:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please, you go ahead and fix it — I'm so glad this came up. Thanks again. — WFinch (talk) 17:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Orson Welles, 1960.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Orson Welles, 1960.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Mutter Erde (talk) 09:50, 16 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Sarah Bernhardt - Camille.png

And also:

File:Sarah Bernhardt - Theodora.png

Yours sincerely, Vera ^(talk) 15:33, 6 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Seattle Times, redux

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

While I think your recent "Seattle Times" category changes are mostly reasonable, Category:The Seattle Times people seems really awkward. When the name of the paper is used adjectivally, "the" is never included. If you really want to keep "the" it should be something like "People associated with The Seattle Times". - Jmabel ! talk 17:52, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Charles Baker headstone

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm trying to understand your removal of category: medal of honor recipients buried at Mount Moriah Cemetery, Philadelphia from File: Charles Baker headstone.jpg. He is a medal of honor recipient buried at Mount Moriah Cemetery. Dwkaminski (talk) 14:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi — I've added that category to his entire category, Category:Charles Baker (Medal of Honor), which contains that image — WFinch (talk) 14:13, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Grand-Illusion-1937.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Grand-Illusion-1937.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:53, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Suspected Vandalism

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

What is your reason for deleting two categories (my edits) at File:Minidoka Relocation Center. G. Kenneth Hikogawa. Polishing "grease-wood" to make furniture. - NARA - 536584.tif. Broichmore (talk) 12:21, 31 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi there — no, this wasn't vandalism. My edit summary reads "categorized jpg"; please see Category:NARA TIF images with categorized JPGs and its talk page. Like many images from the National Archives and Records Administration, this image has duplicate tif and jpg versions that are linked. It's preferred that only the jpg version carry the categories. The jpg version of this image has the two categories you added, as well as categories that I added. Image selection is so much easier when categories aren't crowded with duplicates. Please revert your edit or join the discussion at Category talk:NARA TIF images with categorized JPGs. — WFinch (talk) 13:49, 31 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'm Sorry, why are you not in this conversation? It's in 2012, are you having me on? Regards Broichmore (talk) 14:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I agree with the consensus of that discussion. I encouraged you to join it if you don't agree and feel that the tif versions need to be categorized. The consensus is that they should not be categorized. — WFinch (talk) 14:50, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Overcat

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Isn't it overcategorization to put Category:Gordon Hirabayashi on images that are already in Category:Courage in Action, a direct subcat of Category:Gordon Hirabayashi: it was a symposium on the occasion of the presentation of Hirabayashi's Medal of Freedom to the University of Washington Library Special Collection. - Jmabel ! talk 00:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi there — I'd considered that, but since those files included photographs of Hirabayashi, and a document he completed and signed himself, I thought that it wouldn't hurt to have them directly available in his category, as well. If you think that's not right, please revert my edits. Thanks. — WFinch (talk) 00:44, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Radio Annual and Television Yearbook, 1949

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, WFinch, since you created this category and I created Category:Radio Annual, 1949, following Category:Radio Annual, 1947, I am a bit confused now. What do you suggest? Thank you for your time. -) Lotje (talk) 07:00, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I redirected the category I created, and added a "year in television" category to Radio Annual, 1949. That year was the first time the cover stated this yearbook was now also a television yearbook, as well. It's a title in transition, but the copyright title refers to it still as Radio Annual. (BTW, it looks like the copyright licenses on those yearbook pdfs needs to be revised — they're subjects of deletion requests.) — WFinch (talk) 13:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Jerome Relocation Center, Denson, Arkansas. At the Jerome Relocation Center, where some 8,000 west . . . - NARA - 539306.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I don't know if you notice but in this edit you moved the image from Category:United States photographs taken on 1943-03-11 to the parent Category:Photographs taken on 1943-03-11. Is there a reason why you did that? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for spotting it — it was an error. I've put the image back into the more specific category. — WFinch (talk) 02:12, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Seems like you did it for a number of others. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:37, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Henry-Senber-1965.jpg

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Delano

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Apologies for adding the category Photographs by Jack Delano to photographs already in category Union Station, 1943 (a dozen times). I should have looked deeper. Vysotsky (talk) 14:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for getting in touch, that was no problem at all. So many of those FSA and OWI photos are so poorly categorized that I was actually happy to see them get some attention. It seems to have become my life's work here. — WFinch (talk) 15:07, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

And I was glad to be able to rightly add a dozen photos to the category, like this one. And I added this tool (image uptake stats). Vysotsky (talk) 15:27, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Outstanding. It's upsetting when these photographers aren't getting their due, not to mention the Federal agencies. The images tend to get buried — sometimes in the wrong place entirely, like Category:1939 photographs. — WFinch (talk) 16:10, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Grand Illusion image

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This is a little after the fact, but you didn't provide an edit summary in your revert on File:Grand-Illusion-1937.jpg - what was your reasoning for reverting to a lower quality revision? --Iiii I I I (talk) 19:06, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

In the edit that followed, I added the number of the specific promotional still to the file description: "Photograph is numbered GI-3 at lower right". This number is visible in the original upload, showing the image's magazine publication. A screen capture from a video release is not the same image. You could upload it separately, but please do not overwrite this image. — WFinch (talk) 20:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Clayton-Jackson-McGhie-memorial-Duluth-Minnesota.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Clayton-Jackson-McGhie-memorial-Duluth-Minnesota.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Magnolia677 (talk) 23:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wonderful work

Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Just read this fascinating essay then after a Wiki wander found your Resettlement Administration category. Great work. No Swan So Fine (talk) 12:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, and thanks for the link to that essay, too. I've learned so much in the process of organizing these images, and others in the FSA-OWI category. Since reading that essay it's clear that the hole-punched negatives deserve their own category, so I'll create one. There aren't too many of those rejected images in the Commons yet, but there should be. — WFinch (talk) 15:44, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Three images as yet, or even more? Vysotsky (talk) 16:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi — I'm seeing only three photographs, all from the Resettlement Administration. I've created a category for those — Category:Rejected photographs of the Resettlement Administration, subcategorized within Category:Rejected FSA-OWI photographs. This hole-punching practice continued into September 1942, the Farm Security Administration period, per a search at the Library of Congress. — WFinch (talk) 17:05, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:The Brigand (trailer screenshots)

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category:The Brigand (trailer screenshots) is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Palosirkka (talk) 08:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Post office mural

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks WFinch, I fixed the tag as PD-USGov-Treasury. Best, --Taterian (talk) 00:51, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:The Army at War exhibit display Milwaukee.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:The Army at War exhibit display Milwaukee.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:The Army at War exhibit display Milwaukee.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Eleanor-Roosevelt-WH-Portrait.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Eleanor-Roosevelt-WH-Portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Philafrenzy (talk) 22:27, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

WPA vs. Treasury

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

What is your basis for using the "Treasury" license rather than WPA? Not saying you are wrong, but it was in an exhibit specifically of WPA art. Were the curators wrong about how this was funded? - Jmabel ! talk 01:03, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi there — it’s been awhile. Yes, that mural was created for the Renton post office, one of two post office murals Jacob Elshin did. Those were contests run by the Section of Fine Arts, not WPA. The Renton mural is written up at The Living New Deal. Elshin is listed in the September 1938 issue of the Treasury Section’s Bulletin, when he won the commission for the University Station post office in Seattle. His earlier murals at West Seattle High School were created for the WPA, though.

The Archives of American Art has an oral history interview with Elshin. At one point he tries to clarify the distinction between his WPA murals and Section murals when the interviewer is confusing them. — WFinch (talk) 03:16, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I'll get some of that into the description. - Jmabel ! talk 16:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Floral Park Post Offc 35 Tulip Av 11001 jeh.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Are you sure the Floral Park Post Office on Tulip Avenue is a former post office? If so, where did they move? --DanTD (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

I was going by the information at The Living New Deal: "The historic former post office building in Floral Park, New York was constructed with Treasury Department and Public Works Administration (P.W.A.) funds in 1936. The building presently serves as the Floral Park Public Library. Postal operations have been moved to a new facility a few hundred feet down Tulip Ave."

So thanks for your question. You're quite right about this photograph, which shows the "new facility", an active post office. I'll revert my edit, and I'll also move the "New Deal post offices in New York (state)" category to this photograph of the library up the street. — WFinch (talk) 20:45, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Silent film lobby cards

Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Heyo Walter, I am doing some work in Category:Silent films, and I see that you've created a couple of subcategories for silent films' lobby cards. I think that it would be sensible to move the files up one so they can be consolidated. I just don't think it's worth it to have two categories for only 3 to 6 files. Would you be okay with that? SWinxy (talk) 01:12, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi there — thanks for checking in. I'm not sure which specific lobby card categories you've seen that I've created for silent films; I'm sure I've created quite a few. There are a great many categories for lobby cards for years that fit into the silent era: see Category:Lobby cards of the United States by year. A lobby card is a film poster format that has a particular graphic design interest. Each lobby card category — even if it contains only two files — is subcategorized within a corresponding film poster category, and part of a larger scheme of fairly long standing. Please keep the lobby card categories. Let me know if I'm not explaining things well, it wouldn't be the first time. — WFinch (talk) 02:25, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'm noticing categories like Category:Environment (lobby cards), Category:Everybody's Sweetheart (lobby cards), Category:Folly of Youth (lobby cards), and so on. (Though I'm now noticing you're not the only one who created all of the categories.) I never knew what a lobby card was, so thanks! Is there a particular reason for having them? Is it like, it's always been that way? If the subcategories with only two or three files were removed, the files inside could still inherit the categories. Would a larger discussion need to take place for my idea to happen? SWinxy (talk) 04:51, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Lobby cards are a distinctive type of advertising. The lobby card categories are useful, consistent and correctly subcategorized. When multiple lobby cards for an individual film are uploaded here, they're also categorized by film title. I personally don't understand the rationale for doing what you propose. Yes, I believe deleting dozens of categories would require a discussion. — WFinch (talk) 11:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

What exactly makes them useful, though? I find that having dozens of categories with so few files in them rather pointless. SWinxy (talk) 18:37, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Broken Dishes.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Broken Dishes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Adamant1.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 09:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Removal of "The Vietnam Memorial" photo

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Good morning, Hope all is well. I received an email this morning requesting that this phot be taken down. Why? I took this photo as an interpretation of an event in our history. Giving the due respect to those who answered the call of our nation. Please let me know what the issue is, maybe we can resolve.....Thanks for your attention. 2601:147:8201:2940:658C:A138:6FE8:C687 13:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, and thank you for getting in touch. Please read the discussion I started on the talk page for Three Soldiers — which includes a link to a deletion discussion of Korean War Veterans Memorial photographs. Photographs of permanent monuments and sculptures in public spaces cannot always be hosted by the Commons. In this case, the subject of your photograph is a sculpture that was also actively copyrighted by the artist and the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund in 1983. Their permission is required before any images of the sculpture are uploaded at the Commons. — WFinch (talk) 14:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Big White Fog - original.tif

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I just want to explain my categorizing the above named file. It does not have a categorized jpg so it cannot go in "LC TIF images with categorized JPGs". So I re-categorized it. Krok6kola (talk) 15:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Got it — thanks for your note. — WFinch (talk) 15:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Rio-Rita-1929-LC-1.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Rio-Rita-1929-LC-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:06, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for improving the category for Gorton's Minstrels. Concision is always better. Krok6kola (talk) 03:11, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to participate in/contribute to a photo contest.

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

English

Dear WFinch,

We’re excited to share with you our first-ever art and photo contest for this year’s #VisibleWikiWomen, on Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports!

We’re inviting submissions of photos, illustrations, and other forms of art depicting womxn and non-binary people in sports — as athletes, fans, cheerleaders, referees, journalists, and much more. Our #VisibleWikiWomxn contest celebrates the bodies of womxn in sports by centering their voices, images, stories, and experiences in all their diversity, plurality, and glory.

You can find all the information on our landing page: Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports

Spanish

Hola WFinch,

Queremos invitarte a participar de nuestro primer concurso de arte y fotografía "Cuerpos plurales en el deporte" en el marco de la campaña #VisibleWikiWomen de este año.

Estamos convocando a presentar fotos, ilustraciones y otras formas de arte que representen a mujeres y personas no binarias en el deporte - atletas, personas aficionadas, animadoras, árbitras, periodistas y personas ligadas al deporte en todos los aspectos. Nuestro concurso #VisibleWikiWomxn celebra los cuerpos de las mujeres en el deporte centrándose en sus voces, imágenes, historias y experiencias en toda su diversidad, pluralidad y gloria.

Puedes encontrar toda la información en la página del concurso.

Portuguese

Olá WFinch,

Ficamos felizes em convidar você a participar de nossa primeira Wiki-competição de arte e fotografia, como parte da campanha #VisibleWikiWomen deste ano, sobre "Corpos plurais no esporte"!

Estamos recebendo fotos, ilustrações, e outras formas de arte que retratem mulheres e pessoas não-binárias nos esportes — como atletas, torcedoras, juízas, jornalistas, e muito mais. Nossa competição #VisibleWikiWomxn celebra os corpors de mulheres e pessoas não-binárias e coloca ao centro suas vozes, imagens, histórias, e experiências em toda sua pluralidade e glória.

Você pode encontrar todas as informações necessárias em nossa página: Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports.

Sunshine Fionah Komusana (talk) 15:57, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Milne-Shadowland-1922.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Milne-Shadowland-1922.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hekerui (talk) 20:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:UN Fight for Freedom Leslie Ragan 1943 poster.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:UN Fight for Freedom Leslie Ragan 1943 poster.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Porky Pig any-bonds-today.png

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Porky Pig any-bonds-today.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Nosferattus (talk) 16:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ministry of Information

Latest comment: 11 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This Category:Ministry of Information is a redirect you created in 2018 to the UK's Ministry of Information.

I have found an Indonesian Ministry of Information (MoI) that published their post-WWII constitution here:File:1950 Constitution Eng.jpg

Should this category not be a redirect, since there are at least two and maybe other nations with MoI? Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 18:32, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oh yes, it should be a disambiguation. Please feel free to change that redirect, or I'll circle back later and take care of it. — WFinch (talk) 19:59, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have not done that yet. Please, take cate of it when you are able. Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 03:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done. Thanks for suggesting this; I did find a few existing categories and added them to the list on the disambiguation page. — WFinch (talk) 05:55, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Farm Security Administration / Resettlement Administration

Latest comment: 9 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, How do know which images should be in which category? Thanks, Yann (talk) 20:05, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Yann. I think the best resource is the 1988 book Documenting America 1935–1943. A good bit of it can be searched via Google; I finally bought it in hardcover. When I was categorizing FSA-OWI images a few years ago, I scribbled this on a post-it that's still in my work area — the dates that one program transitioned into another:

RA > FSA — September 1, 1937
FSA > OWI — October 1942

The Resettlement Administration was created May 1, 1935, and was folded into the Farm Security Administration on September 1, 1937. The Office of War Information photography division began in June 1942, but it took until October 1942 to move the FSA photographers (with the exception of Russell Lee) into it. When an image has a FSA-OWI license I refer to those transition dates, then try to confirm the image date as best I can via LOC and other resources. It can be a tangle. WFinch (talk) 21:46, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

OK thanks, but then most of files under Category:Farm Security Administration are in the wrong categories. Yann (talk) 12:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oh dear. If you see particular files, please put them where they need to be or let me know and I'll do some more work. I created categories for individual photographers in Category:Farm Security Administration photographs — and likewise Category:Resettlement Administration photographs and Category:United States Office of War Information photographs. — WFinch (talk) 12:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

A play vs. a particular production

Latest comment: 8 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:The_Yellow_Ticket_(play)&diff=prev&oldid=866405867: unless I'm mistaken, The Yellow Ticket was a much-produced play. Should we really lump all productions of it under one producer? - Jmabel ! talk 14:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I was considering the same thing when dealing Arthur Hopkins, A. H. Woods, Katharine Cornell and other theatre producers who should be given their due. I agree there should be subcategories for individual productions. For now, though, I've been adding producers to the play category, just to get the connection on the record. All of these categories should be built out, really, with the subcategory structure of Category:Productions of Romeo and Juliet. — WFinch (talk) 15:28, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

PS — In the case of The Yellow Ticket, A. H. Woods was the original producer, so I think his name belongs on the play itself. — WFinch (talk) 15:32, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Maybe something like a Category:Plays by original producer? Just like playing Falstaff doesn't make you Will Kemp. - Jmabel ! talk 20:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Shocktrauma-1982-Cowley-Conrad.jpg

Latest comment: 2 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Shocktrauma-1982-Cowley-Conrad.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Shocktrauma-1982-Cowley-Conrad.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Queen of Hearts (talk) 04:35, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

(for the avoidance of doubt, this is a crop of a file I nosourced.) Queen of Hearts (talk) 04:38, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I see: I cropped the original file and placed it in the article for the film Shocktrauma. An editor named ShockTrauma1 uploaded the photo in 2013 and claimed it as their own work, and that's proving to be doubtful. Thank you for starting the speedy deletion process. — WFinch (talk) 13:17, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 17 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:FDR-Memorial-The-Rural-Couple-color.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 08:34, 11 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 17 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:FDR-Memorial-Fireside-Chat.jpg

Yours sincerely, – BMacZero (🗩) 17:07, 11 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic