Vassil

Welcome to the Commons, Vassil!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

QI Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006-1- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

grendel|khan 03:38, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Petting: yes; pets: no

Hi. Thanks for adding categories to the images I uploaded. I regret to inform you, however, that in the interest of accuracy, you will probably need to recategorize most of them. Those are not pets, they are wild animals who converge on my backyard and while, indeed, I have been privileged enough to be able to pet some of them, their home in the forest, and unlike Kitty, they do not depend on me for food and shelter. Also, I feel I should point out that the creature in this and many other similar images is not a squirrel, but rather, a chipmunk (much smaller, timid). See this image, for example, as a frame of reference to compare between the two. Many thanks. Best, ElC 15:50, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Hello again and thanks for the prompt response. I replied on my talk page. Best, ElC 20:58, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale d'Auch 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte Mars 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Cornély 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Antique dolls.

But don't you know which country's doll are these? It is can be a help for viewers. --Beyond silence 04:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC) Well, I took the picture in a stand during an exhibition.It was in France, but it doesn't mean that the dolls are French, and I didn't want to bore the antiquarian with questions, just because she authorized me to take pictures. But I am sure that these dolls are old, I suppose they are from the second half of the 19th century. Vassil 12:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:ND de Tronoën Calvaire 2.jpg

Can you help on overexpod parts? Otherwise I can promote it. --Beyond silence 00:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks, I tried my best.I think it's better now, especially in the right corner. Vassil 01:28, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Great! My plesure. --Beyond silence 03:09, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ND Amiens gargouilles 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agate de l'Esterel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vitraux Cathédrale d'Auch 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ND de Tronoën Portail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Finistère .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Notre-Dame-de-Roscudon 060706.jpg

Please can you write an English Description? Thanks --Beyond silence 03:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC) It's done (for other pics of this church too). Thank you for rewiewing my pictures. Vassil 17:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siamang 140804.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grues couronnées 140808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abreuvoir 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame-de-Roscudon 060706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suricate 140803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mara Thoiry 19801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gnou Thoiry 19801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhodochrosite 2581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Servals Thoiry 19801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Framboise Margy 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danburite 2581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gibbon Amiens 26873.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Tiled roof in Dubrovnik.jpg

Can you see new edit of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Tiled roof in Dubrovnik.jpg? Do you see marks on the sky? Thank you very much --Beyond silence 08:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Don't you like vote? --Beyond silence 19:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Hôtel de Ville 24972 C.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheval de bois 281072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion (23)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Génie de la Liberté 971.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Location of Image:Chapelle Finistère .jpg

Could you please give further indication on the location of this chapelle or its name? There are probably hundreds of them in Finistère, so the image is unlikely to be used in an encyclopedical article without this info... Thanks, --Jul 16:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC) It's done. Vassil 13:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gargouille Saint-Urbain Troyes 110208 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

-- kind of a sad way to be stuck for eternity.... carol 10:53, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Please link images

---

Hello Vassil!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. Siebrand 20:42, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Photos de la cathédrale d'Amiens

Permets-moi de te féliciter pour tes nombreuses photos et notamment celles de la cathédrale d'Amiens. J'ai remarqué que tu en avais publié de nouvelles ce 15 juin. Etant donné que je termine l'article en français concernant cette cathédrale, j'en ai déjà incorporé quelques-unes qui manquaient cruellement. Une question : tu as fait la photo d'une "Vierge à l'enfant" repertoriée Vierge Cathédrale d'Amiens 090608.jpg. Puis-je te demander où elle se situe dans la cathédrale, car je n'arrive pas à la retrouver dans ma documentation? Merci.

Encore une chose : d'après le nombre de tes photos d'Amiens, j'en déduis, peut-être erronément, que tu habites la région ou que tu y passes régulièrement. Si tu y repasses, serait-il possible de prendre une ou deux photos de la façade sud du transept et de l'intérieur de celui-ci (surtout la chapelle saint Sébastien, à l'angle du transept nord et du déambulatoire du choeur). Commons ne possède quasi rien sur ce transept, à part la rosace nord et la Vierge Dorée du portail sud. Excuses-moi de te déranger avec ça, mais je n'habite pas tout près (Bruxelles) et je suis handicapé des deux jambes, ce qui m'empêche totalement de marcher. A plus, j'espère.

Jdresse de Wikipédia francophone.

91.177.141.125 13:03, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Photos de la cathédrale d'Amiens (II)

Bonjour,

Merci beaucoup pour ta réponse à ma demande et à mon message. J'ai déjà incorporé certaines de tes nouvelles et très intéressantes photos (chapelle de S. Sébastien et monument J. de Sachy). Excuses-moi de t'avoir pris pour un habitant de la Somme. Puisque le transept sud de la cathédrale est en restauration, et que tu habites Reims, je me sens gêné de t'avoir sollicité . Excuses-moi encore. Ce que tu as fait est déjà formidable. Cependant si un jour, plus tard, tu passes par là, une bonne photo de cette façade sera toujours bienvenue. Encore merci,

Jdresse de Wikipédia francophone.

91.176.129.73 07:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Photos de cathédrales

Rebonjour,

Merci pour tes derniers messages. Tu l'as peut-être constaté, tes dernières photos sont déjà intégrées dans l'article, qui commence à prendre ainsi une belle allure. Si j'ai un peu tardé à te répondre, c'est que j'ai beaucoup réfléchi à ta proposition de réaliser de nouvelles photos sur un autre site. Alors, disons que j'accepte avec enthousiasme. Mon problème est que je ne possède pas toujours de documentation suffisante pour écrire un article complet et valable. C'est le cas pour les cathédrales de Laon, Beauvais, Troyes, et surtout Reims, que j'aimerais un peu travailler.

Pour le moment, je me permets de te proposer une excursion à la Cathédrale Saint-Étienne de Meaux, ville historiquement champenoise et non pas francilienne comme on le prétend actuellement, pour laquelle je possède une documentation valable, mais dont "Commons" ne possède que ... deux malheureuses photos. Un vrai désert pour lequel tout est à faire, tant l'intérieur que l'extérieur. J'avais commencé à étoffer l'article il y a peu, mais face à la pénurie de photos, j'avais suspendu ce projet. Comme cela correspond à ton rayon d'action, ce serait gentil d'y faire un petit tour quand tu en as le temps. C'est non seulement une superbe (petite) cathédrale gothique, mais aussi l'ancien évêché de Bossuet. Merci beaucoup d'avance et à plus,

Jdresse de Wikipédia francophone. 91.176.34.220 16:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Chapelle Saint-Etienne Cathédrale d'Amiens 110608 01.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:28, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Photos de la cathédrale d'Amiens (III)

Bonjour, j'espère que tu vas bien,

Merci beaucoup pour ton message, et surtout félicitations pour la qualité des photos qui m'ont presque coupé le souffle...Je vais bientôt les introduire dans l'article qui, grâce à toi, est devenu un "must" pour ce qui concerne l'art baroque français. Et puis, merci pour les notices que tu as ajoutées aux photos ; elles me seront fort précieuses pour compléter les paragraphes concernant les diverses chapelles, car je compte remanier l'article, au vu de l'abondance de détails que tu me fournis. Il y a certains détails que je ne trouvais pas dans ma documentation et que tu explicites fort bien. Merci aussi d'avance pour Meaux. Je constate que tu es pleine de ressources, alors puisque tu es Rémoise, puis-je te demander, si un jour tu te promènes dans la campagne environnante (ou à Reims), de prendre une ou deux belles photos de la Vesle et de l'Ardre, son affluent (ou de n'importe quelle rivière de la région d'ailleurs). Il se fait que j'ai aussi écrit une série d'articles sur les rivières de Champagne (et d'un peu toute la France), mais ça manque cruellement de photos. Si ça ne te dis rien de le faire, ou si tu n'aimes pas prendre des photos de paysages, je ne serai pas vexé. J'espère ne pas t'ennuyer avec mes demandes. Surtout ne te déplaces pas rien que pour me faire plaisir. A bientôt j'espère.

jdresse 91.176.139.35 18:00, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausolée de Charles de Vitry Amiens 110608 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. -- א 13:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausolée de Charles de Vitry Amiens 110608 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Très bien! (Well done!) --א 13:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Joseph Saint Luc Amiens 110608 01B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments meets QI requirements --Mbdortmund 01:23, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Cathédrale de Meaux

Chère Vassil,

J'ai bien reçu ton message concernant ta visite à Meaux, et je t'en remercie. Ravi aussi d'apprendre que l'excursion t'a plu, et soulagé, car c'est épatant de pouvoir joindre l'utile à l'agréable. Tes photos sont superbes. Elles m'ont appris qu'il existait des gargouilles mâles et ce sont les premières photos de celles-ci que je découvre. Félicitations aussi pour tes photos primées de la cathédrale d'Amiens. Je vais, bien sûr, les intégrer toutes dans l'article. Il me faut d'abord terminer un travail engagé fin juin et concernant les cours d'eau français et wallons, et dès ce week-end, je reprendrai les articles sur les cathédrales.

A bientôt j'espère,

Jdresse 91.177.136.124 12:50, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

PS : Sans vouloir t'importuner, quelques photos des portails et chapelles de Notre-Dame de Laon seraient aussi les bienvenues... C'est un article auquel je réfléchis depuis deux trois mois, et puisque c'est assez proche de Reims, je me permets de t'en faire part. En fait, je vise toutes les cathédrales de la moitié nord de la France (surtout les gothiques), mais c'est un travail extrêmement long et complexe. Ainsi, j'ai travaillé plus de 400 heures rien que sur Amiens, et autant pour Notre-Dame de Paris...et ce n'est pas terminé. Bonne journée

Vézelay

Rebonjour,

J'ai oublié de te parler de Vézelay. D'abord, mes félicitations pour les fort belles photos que tu y a prises. A part la rubrique historique, l'article est très sommaire et nécessite un "lifting" très important. C'est malheureusement le cas de quantité d'articles sur les édifices religieux (et pas seulement dans la wikipédia francophone...). Je vais me réserver quelques heures ou quelques jours dans les prochaines semaines pour tenter d'améliorer cela, d'autant plus que ça me fait plaisir que tu t'adresses à moi pour le faire. Ça me permet de te faire plaisir à mon tour. Et puis un monument aussi superbe que la Basilique de Vézelay mérite bien un peu d'attention. Mon problème est que je m'y connais moins bien en art roman. Mais heureusement j'ai un peu de documentation sur les principales églises bourguignonnes. J'ai d'ailleurs travaillé sur les cathédrales de Sens et d'Auxerre (qui elles manquent cruellement de photos...). Bref, à plus,

Jdresse 91.176.35.188 08:49, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Re-Vézelay, Ardre et Notre-Dame d'Amiens

Bonjour, j'espère que tes vacances se passent bien (si tu es en vacances),

J'ai analysé à fond le cas Vézelay et décider de développer cet article prioritairement, étant donnée la quantité énorme de photos qui dorment dans commons (dont 75 sont tiennes), et l'absence totale de développement de cet article depuis un an ou deux. Si tu y jettes un coup d'oeil, tu verras que j'ai déja intégré une série de tes photos, au niveau des portails du narthex notamment. Mais ce n'est qu'un début, car je vais bientôt aborder les chapiteaux. Tes chapit~eaux sont superbes et très intéressants, alors j'ai décidé de foncer...

Concernant l'Ardre, j'ai épluché les libellés comme tu me l'avais demandé. Il y a, à mon avis, une erreur de localisation du pont qui fait la limite entre les sections de première et de deuxième catégorie, car l'Ardre ne passe pas à Méry-Prémécy, mais à Faverolles-Coëmy. Un arrêté préfectoral de la Marne que j'ai trouvé sur internet précise de fait que cette limite se trouve au pont de Faverolles. Et cela correpond bien à ce qui est dessiné sur la carte Michelin. Peux-tu rectifier la légende? Il y aurait dès lors le même problème au niveau de la station d'épuration.

Enfin pour Amiens, je t'avais posé la question concernant l'endroit où se trouve la Vierge Vierge Cathédrale d'Amiens 090608.jpg. Je pense qu'elle est située au niveau inférieur du puissant contrefort nord ou gauche édifié fin du XIVe siècle, sous le règne de Charles V, pour éviter l'écroulement de la tour nord. Penses-tu que c'est juste ? Merci de rassembler tes souvenirs.
De plus, en relisant un ancien message, j'ai lu que tu retournerais à Amiens cet été. Si c'est le cas, puis-je te demander de prendre une ou deux photos de cet énorme contrefort très orné, paraît-il, et qui comporte outre la Vierge et deux saints, les statues du roi Charles V (très rare) et de ses deux fils, dont le dauphin, futur Charles VI. Ce serait génial d'avoir une photo de ces deux rois. Ils se situent au dessus du niveau de la Vierge c'est-à-dire au deuxième niveau. Je n'ai trouvé nulle part la moindre photo de ce coin là.

Merci d'avance et encore tous mes compliments pour les photos de Vézelay et d'ailleurs,

Signé Jdresse - 91.176.34.39 09:47, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale de Meaux Vitrail Marie 290708 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Berthold Werner 15:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale de Meaux Vitrail Marie 290708 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Berthold Werner 15:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierge à l'Enfant Laon 150808 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice looking with no flaws! Mrmariokartguy 23:31, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Façade Cathédrale de Laon Hippopotame 14 09 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good picture . interesting motive --Mbdortmund 11:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orgue Cathédrale de Laon 140908 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 11:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC) "Good" is not a proper review. Mrmariokartguy 14:15, 16 September 2008 (UTC) Still better than your discuss reason. Changed back to Promotion. --Dschwen 17:31, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortillonnages d'Amiens 190908 Passerelle 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture, but could you perhaps add a geocoding? -- MJJR 19:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC) It's done. Vassil 22:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortillonnages d'Amiens 230908 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, subject well valued.--B.navez 21:53, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Pierre l'Ermite Amiens 190908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 21:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortillonnages d'Amiens 230908 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too dark at first sight, but actually very good work! -- MJJR 20:45, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dynasty Fismes 270908 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sépulcre Arc-en-Barrois 111008 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 20:09, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vitrail Arc-en-Barrois 121008 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Lycaon 13:17, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sépulcre Joinville 200908 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent -- Albertus teolog 10:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enfant Jésus de Prague Joinville 200908 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's OK. --Lestath 21:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vitrail Vierge Arc-en-Barrois 281008 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good detail for a picture of this kind. --Eusebius 08:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

File:Amiens Cathédrale Spectacle 190908 01.jpg

Bonjour.

En cherchant à illustrer l'article "son et lumière" de fr.wp, je suis tombée sur vos photos de la cathédrale d'Amiens. Et je me suis posé des questions : que voulez-vous dire par "Façade de la cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Amiens pendant le son et lumière. Ce spectacle gratuit (...) reconstitue la polychromie des statues par projection lumineuse, réalisée par la société Skertzo (à contacter pour une utilisation des photos)." : l'éclairage est-il copyrighté ou non ? S'il l'est, alors la photo ne doit pas être sur Commons.

J'ai parlé de mon interrogation sur le Bistro : Commons:Bistro#Photo qui ne devrait pas être ici ?. Jastrow m'a conseillé de vous poser la question... Merci d'avance de vos réponses (peut-être directement sur la discussion du Bistro ?). --Edhral (talk) 17:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Photo Musée G

Bonjour, Je suis tombé par hazard sur une de tes photos du musée Guillemet. Sais tu si une photo prise dans ce musée est vraiment publiable? Est-ce autorisé par le musée? En te remerciant de l'info. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 18:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Gorgoroth pictures

Hi, please do not remove description or categories from images, even if they are nominated for deletion. If they are kept eventually, it creates extra-work to restore these informations, and it can be misleading for people who review the images to comment on the DR. Thanks. –Tryphon^☂ 21:27, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Snow Leopard Clearance

Hi, I am interested in using your photo of a snow leopard turned away from the camera with his tail in the foreground in a book I am writing. While I realize you have released this photo into the public domain, my publisher is insisting I make sure you are the photographer and owner of the rights to the photo. Would you be willing to help me out by signing a permission form? If you could email me at matteier@gmail.com, I could give you the form I would need signed, and you could email it back to me. I would give you credit in the book, and I could also pay you a small sum if you are interested. Thank you.

réponse Florac

Bonjour, et tout d'abord jolies photos, le projet Lozère & Gévaudan est toujours preneur de photos de cette qualité pour ses articles ;). En ce qui concerne Urbain V, rien de bien compliqué quand même. Dès qu'il y a un pape dans une église lozérienne, sauf cas particulier, il s'agit de Guillaume de Grimoard. D'autant plus si proche de son lieu de naissance. Bonne continuation, Sanguinez (talk) 18:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Vassil!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:19, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Taake Hellfest 2009 3 NB.jpg is uncategorized since 26 June 2009.
• Image:Dark Tranquillity 121007 05.jpg is uncategorized since 29 June 2009.
• Image:Vitrail Cathédrale de Moulins 160609 31.jpg is uncategorized since 3 July 2009.
• Image:Lourdes ND Rosaire 06.jpg was uncategorized on 27 August 2009.
• Image:Marduk Paris 21207 19.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Horna Paris 897 07.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Negura Bunget Hellfest 2010 TERR 04.jpg was uncategorized on 17 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Longwy Emaux Rudhardt Terre de fer 27 11 2011 01.jpg was uncategorized on 30 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:48, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Endstille Osnabruck 03 12 2011 07.jpg was uncategorized on 14 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:37, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Next time

Thanky for your edit in de:wikipedia, next time you can also add the image directly to "Bild" which means picture in German. Greetings --hroest 18:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ND de Fourvière Intérieur 250709 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good --George Chernilevsky 15:28, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Metz Saint-Martin Vitraux 291109 07.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:20, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Image dates

Hi, I looked at several metal images you took and I want to ask you to please use the date of creation as the photo date - the line is not meant for the date of upload (which is clearly visible in the log anyway). Could you please also use the ISO-format YYYY-MM-DD, so the date is displayed right for all languages? Thank you! 18:36, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Please give images good descriptions

---

I noticed you've uploaded File:Cambrai 221109 Carpeaux La Jeune Fille 6.jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

High Contrast (talk) 12:19, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Done.Vassil (talk) 12:21, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dolichotis patagonum (Patagonian Mara).

review

•  Support Following Archaeodontosaurus' reason. --Myrabella (talk) 11:25, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

MVR Scores: 
1. Dolichotis patagonum -Temaiken Zoo-8a-1c.jpg: -1
2. Mara Thoiry 19803.jpg: +1 <--
=>
File:Dolichotis patagonum -Temaiken Zoo-8a-1c.jpg: Declined.
File:Mara Thoiry 19803.jpg: Promoted. <--

--Myrabella (talk) 19:23, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image File:Liseron Amiens.jpg

Dear Vassil, I just changed the ID of your image File:Liseron Amiens.jpg from Convolvulus arvensis to Calystegia sepium. There might be Calystegia silvatica in parts of France (see http://www.tela-botanica.org/eflore/BDNFF/4.02/nn/12348 ), which might look very similar. Convolvulus arvensis has got different leaves which are not as wide relative to their length and not as deeply heart-shaped at the base. Nevertheless I got some advice from de:Wikipedia:Redaktion_Biologie/Bestimmung (see the Commons page with your image for the actual link!) before reassigning the image to Calystegia sepium. Best regards -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 15:58, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Gargouille Cathédrale de Moulins 060709 16.jpg

Hello, I just saw your two pictures and added the category "Cynocephali" to it, because I think this gargouille is a "dog-head" and not a werewolf.--Inugami-bargho (talk) 11:31, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Gibbon Amiens 26873.jpg

We wanted to let you know that we've used another of your pictures in a project of ours: http://litpics.tumblr.com/post/6915717177/lit-journal-of-voyages-by-jacob-dunham-pic

Here is the other picture that we've used of yours: http://litpics.tumblr.com/post/843277257/lit-the-rustlers-of-pecos-county-by-zane-grey

We created a computer program to generate random pairings of sentences from public domain texts and public domain / creative commons images. Some of the pictures we've selected come from the Wikipedia Commons. All the pictures we select ourselves, but the pairings and the text are random. Of these pairings that are generated, we only post the most interesting combinations.

We welcome any feedback about our site.

Thanks for sharing your pictures,
Samantha and Patrick

blog: http://litpics.tumblr.com/
email: litpicsblog@gmail.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/litpics

Litpics (talk) 01:59, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Permission

Hello.

I have written a book for children about animals that I want to publish. In searching for photographic images, I have found your picture that is very beautiful and fit the storyline that I want to convey. I will appreciate it if you will give me permission to use these photo in my book. Below are the animal that will represents your photo. I will also include all info that will accompany the acknowledgements.

I will acknowledge your work - Beneath the photo and at the end of the book, your information. I ask that if you agree, to kindly send me your Name and appropriate information as you wish it to be published.

Photographer: Vassil. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coccinelle_sur_une_fleur.jpg Ladybug.

Thank you very much. Louise - zandtree@yahoo.com

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Throne of Katarsis Speyer 19 02 2011 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Will pass IMO --Ximonic 10:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Setherial Igel Rock 12 09 2010 1 NB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Barely a good photogrpah. Like it that you decided to take it in black and white --A.Ceta 09:34, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Mosquée_de_Tarbes_191007.jpg

File:Mosquée_de_Tarbes_191007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Civa (talk) 13:48, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Galmier Eglise 07 2011 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 21:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urgehal Metal Mean Festival 20 08 2011 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me.--Jebulon 17:59, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Place_Stanislas_Opéra_211207.jpg

File:Place_Stanislas_Opéra_211207.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Léna (talk) 20:58, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

QIC Decline

For some reason you have declined this image which I nominated in QIC with the reason "crop at the top". I didn't crop this picture and all of the Alpaca except for the end of a few hairs at the top which doesn't really disturb the image in my opinion. The quality of the image is also good. I've commented on the image's nomination 2 days ago and you don't seem to respond there--Someone35 (talk) 11:03, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

I meant to view only the face of the alpaca, I have other pictures of alpacas which have all of their body visible, also how am I supposed to take a picture with both ears of the alpaca?--Someone35 (talk) 13:26, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Will it be better if I crop the right part of the image?--Someone35 (talk) 14:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Cropped the image, please take a look at it again--Someone35 (talk) 14:38, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

k thanks--Someone35 (talk) 14:12, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Keep of Kalessin Metal Mean 20 08 2011 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:16, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urgehal Metal Mean Festival 20 08 2011 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:33, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liège Eglise saint-Jacques 23 08 2009 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and propotion but the lighting is problematic, but it's good enough for QIC in my opinion --Someone35 15:51, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liège Eglise saint-Jacques Vitrail 23 08 2009 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Someone35 17:27, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hylas Saint-Romain-en Gal 07 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 22:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée GR de Saint-Romain-en-Gal 27 07 2011 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 22:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais du Tau Statues originales 17062011 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but try not to have objects in the background of your pictures next time --Someone35 15:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwiefalten 28 04 2011 Angels 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vishnou Gujarat Bruxelles 02 10 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice! --Ralf Roletschek 08:18, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahavira Bruxelles 02 10 2011 .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:13, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shiva Nataraja Tanjore Bruxelles 02 10 2011 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 06:53, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodhisattva Jin Shanxi Bruxelles 02 10 2011 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 15:09, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Pauluskerk Antwerpen 21 08 2010 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 13:24, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Pauluskerk Antwerpen 21 08 2010 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:25, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Keep of Kalessin Metal Mean 20 08 2011 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments excellent --Ralf Roletschek 18:29, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Bruxelles Divinite farouche Tibet 02 10 2011.jpg

Hi Vassil, could you please date (approximately) the original art work shown in this image. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruxelles Divinite farouche Tibet 02 10 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 07:59, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine des Quatre-Parties-du-Monde 20 11 2010 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 19:03, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dark Fortress Metal Mean 20 08 2011 10 B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruxelles Cheval Tang 02 10 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 21:02, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carpeaux Valenciennes 080810 36 Amour blessé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Comment Anomaly on the background see note. --Archaeodontosaurus 13:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Thanks, I fixed the anomaly. --Vassil 18:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC) k, promoted--Someone35 08:16, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Artedia squamata new versions

Hi. There is a little problem. You have upload a new verision of File:Artedia squamata 1 edit.jpg, but also i made it File:Artedia squamata 1.jpg. What need to do? Sorry for my english. --T137(talk) 13:15, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Ok, but now we have 2 identical phots. Is it fine? thanks anyway. --T137(talk) 16:49, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chene Fau Verzy 23 10 2011 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 08:40, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Trou maçonnique

Salut !

Conformément à ta demande, le "trou" maçonnique a désormais perdu sa feuille...--Jebulon (talk) 15:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fau de la Demoiselle Verzy 23 10 2011 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:33, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruxelles Disque jade Xuanji 02 10 2011 B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:33, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fau de Verzy 23 10 2011 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 14:28, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mur Païen 01 11 2011 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a little bit dark but QI for me. --Ralf Roletschek 22:00, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mont Saint-Odile 1 11 2011 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice colors! --Ralf Roletschek 19:55, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruxelles Zodiaque Boeuf Shanxi 02 10 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 00:39, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helfaut Interieur 28 10 2011 03 B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Léna 01:05, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helfaut Interieur 28 10 2011 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Léna 01:05, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helfaut Generatrice 28 10 2011 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments little "tilt" ccw, non ? Otherwise very good.--Jebulon 15:38, 12 November 2011 (UTC)Merci, j'espère avoir corrigé le problème. --Vassil 12:22, 13 November 2011 (UTC)oui.--Jebulon 10:38, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Loup de l'Arctique 14082.jpg

We wanted to let you know that we've used another one of your pictures in a project of ours: http://litpics.tumblr.com/post/12898836074/lit-murphy-by-ernest-gambier-parry-pic-vassil

Thanks for sharing your pictures,
Samantha and Patrick

blog: http://litpics.tumblr.com/
email: litpicsbloggmail.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/litpics

Litpics (talk) 14:55, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Name for a photo

Hello! I needed some photos for a book that I'm doing at the work, and I chose on of yours (this one). It could be possible to know your real name to put it in the attributions' page? (it's a kind of book where it looks far better a complete name&surname than an user name). Thank you anyway, -- Syrio posso aiutare? 10:48, 23 November 2011 (UTC) Please credit to Vassil Asjac.

Thanks a lot! :) -- Syrio posso aiutare? 13:13, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Musée Boyadjian MRAH 20 11 2011 Ex-voto 09.jpg

Salut, Je m'interroge sur la description de ce coeur. Je ne vois rien de catholique là-dedans, mais j'y reconnais bien, en revanche, le monogramme de la reine Marie-Antoinette, ce qui le daterait plutôt de la fin du XVIIIème siècle. As-tu d'autres lumières sur le sujet ?--Jebulon (talk) 10:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Merci de ta réponse. Avoue qu'on pourrait s'y tromper. Je vais creuser la question. Merci en tous cas pour une belle photo d'un bel objet, avec un peu de mystère...--Jebulon (talk) 00:36, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Boyadjian MRAH 20 11 2011 Ex-voto 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very nice --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Boyadjian MRAH 20 11 2011 Coussin 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 12:54, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Boyadjian MRAH 20 11 2011 Coussin 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 12:54, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MRAH Verre 07 Roemer XIX 20 12 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The blurring of the background is not perfect, but the main subject is very good and sharp--Jebulon 16:47, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vitrail Jean Hack 3 1542 MRAH 20 11 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and interesting, with very good EV. I'm not a fan of the white background in this case and the "cut-off" is a bit harsh IMO, but it is a QI, because the main subject is very good and sharp.--Jebulon 16:36, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Thanks. But I didn't remove the background, the faces are set on a white lighting glass. --Vassil 19:41, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vitrail Jean Hack 4 1542 MRAH 20 11 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Same comments as for the "Jean de Louvain" 's one.--Jebulon 16:38, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vitrail Jean Hack 2 1542 MRAH 20 11 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments As Jean de Louvain's comments.--Jebulon 16:38, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MRAH Verre 01 Fiole Egypte 20 12 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for QI, even if I'm not sure with the DoF.--Jebulon 02:05, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dinant Collegiale 270510 Vitrail 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aleks G 23:25, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MRAH 271211 6 Dieu et la Vierge XVI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilt ccw ? --Jebulon 17:24, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Exact, merci. Est-ce mieux maintenant ? Le fauteuil de la Vierge n'est pas d'équerre, c'est d'origine. --Vassil 17:58, 27 December 2011 (UTC)C'est très beau et très bien photographié. QI--Jebulon 23:46, 27 December 2011 (UTC) Merci :) --Vassil 10:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MRAH 271211 2 Seigneur et dame.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and interesting--Jebulon 16:08, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MRAH Aquamanile Aristote et Phyllis 261211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments hoi! fine picture! --Mbdortmund 00:09, 27 December 2011 (UTC)...and nice object too. But I'm not sure with the background, the thing seems "floating"...--Jebulon 01:40, 27 December 2011 (UTC)C'est vrai...je voulais changer du fond noir, que j'ai mis aussi. --Vassil 12:51, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MRAH Verre 271211 03 Ducdalf FN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI (maybe maybe a little unsharp at the bottom, but otherwise very good).--ArildV 22:14, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MRAH Verre 271211 02 Bocal XVI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 22:19, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

MAP Expo Armure Clan Ikeda Dragon 30 12 2011 2.jpg

Bonne année! Ceci dit il est très bien ton dragon en QI, mais il penche un peu si tu le redresse se serait parfait...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:18, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Masque de Samouraï

Il est splendide ce masque, le pb c'est l'éclairage, mais tu n'y es pour rien. Par contre sous les parties sombres tu as toutes les informations. Avec photoshop, j'ai vérifié, tu peux les faire réapparaître (tons clairs/tons sombres)... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:09, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Image guidelines - downsampling

Hello. There have been many inconsistencies regarding the evaluation of images in Commons, mainly on the issue of resolution and sharpness. I think we should agree upon a uniform policy, and try to reach a consensus. I started a new discussion on the matter of downsampling, if you would like to share your view. Thank you. Gidip (talk) 21:07, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAP Expo Armure Clan Ikeda Dragon 30 12 2011 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 15:08, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAP Expo Somen Muneakira 02 01 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 13:12, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAP Expo Nanban kabuto 05 01 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAP Expo Empereur Ojin Poupée 03 01 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, and Nice eyebrows ;).--Jebulon 15:58, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Map Expo Zunari kabuto 03 01 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, and Nice ear ;) --Jebulon 16:00, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAP Expo Sujibachi kabuto Menpo 06 01 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, and Nice mustache ;)--Jebulon 16:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAP Expo Maori Hameçon 13012012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 04:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAP Expo Maori Epingle 30 12 2011 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAP Expo Maori Hei tiki 15 01 2012 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The light could be a little bit more diffuse, but still QI I think. Also interesting valuable Motif. --NorbertNagel 21:47, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAP Expo Maori Hei tiki 15 01 2012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The light could be a little bit more diffuse, but still QI I think. Also interesting valuable Motif. --NorbertNagel 21:47, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MRAH Verre 23012012 Aiguiere 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --99of9 09:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MRAH Verre 23012012 Flute 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 17:28, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Vierge à Cordoue

Bonjour Vassil.

J'ai tenté de prendre en compte ta remarque sur le caractère jaunasse de "ma" statue de la vierge dans la Cathédrale de Cordoue. Je te remercie de ton coup d'oeil, car je crois en effet que tu as raison. J'ai tenté d'améliorer la chose. Ces chapelles sont bien sombres, et l'omniprésence des dorures baroques est encore amplifiée par l'éclairage, effectivement. Je sais que tu n'ignores pas à quel point ce genre d'images est difficile à faire ! Peux-tu à nouveau jeter un regard, s'il te plaît, et me dire ce que tu en penses ? Merci --Jebulon (talk) 17:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Chipotons, chipotons, il en reste toujours quelque chose !! Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 19:05, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Remi Reims Rose Façade 05 02 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Super. Digne des trois labels à mon avis. Tente une proposition en FP.--Jebulon 00:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PBAL Rodin L'Ange déchu 28012012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 15:46, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PBAL Deplechin Amphitrite 28012012 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Vitraux

Bonjour,

Je crois que tu pourrais proposer quelques-uns de tes vitraux comme images remarquables. Nous avons peu d'images de vitraux de cette qualité. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:21, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mons Sainte Waudru Vitrail 12 02 2012 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 05:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mons Sainte Waudru Vitrail 12 02 2012 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent! --Yann 05:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for editing the picture Psyche_Leptosia_nina_by_kadavoor.JPG; I know little editing. Thanks, Jee - Jkadavoor (talk) 06:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MRAH Verre 20022012 Coupe XVII 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and High EV--Jebulon 23:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MRAH Verre 20022012 Calice XVII.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice ! --Jebulon 23:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Remarque sur le détourage de photos

Bonjour,

Merci pour vos remarques. Je ne fais jamais de sélection automatique, je procède par sélections multiple en faisant des sélection par contour, par couleurs, par contraste, et en faisant les finitions à la main (ce qui prends beaucoup de temps, mais j'essaie d'être parfait). Ici, il semble effectivement qu'il y a ait un léger soucis pour le nez de l'ange (pourtant je l'ai recommencé 2 fois). Pour ce qui est de Hercule, je crois simplement que c'est un problème d'adoucissement de la sélection qui cause cet effet. La jambe est correctement découpée mais un peu crénelée. Et pour le buste d'André Lens, je pense que c'est le marbre lui-même qui est cassé, je vérifierai sur la photo originale.

Merci pour votre vigilance. --M0tty (talk) 13:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cambrai SPAD VII 221109 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 08:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cambrai SPAD VII 221109 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality image for me. --Frank Schulenburg 14:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vienne Saint Maurice 28 07 2011 07 Voussures.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helrunar Metal Mean 20 08 2011 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's good, albeit somewhat high ISO, but I'm not convinced by the composition - bit tight at the top. Mattbuck 23:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC) Now I've uploaded the original shot without crop, is it better ?. --Vassil 19:04, 28 February 2012 (UTC) Yes, as are the colours. Mattbuck 16:51, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAP Paris Fibules 04032012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 14:33, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAP Paris Bracelet Siwa 04032012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 14:33, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vienne Saint Maurice 28 07 2011 02 Feuille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 16:30, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée du Quai Branly Pendentif turkmene 04032012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image for me. --Frank Schulenburg 08:34, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée du Quai Branly Robe Pakistan 04032012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 19:48, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée du Quai Branly Coupe-noix d'arec Inde 04032012 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be sharper for parts, but good and interesting--Jebulon 23:43, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée du Quai Branly Papouasie Pectoral 04032012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and useful. --NorbertNagel 21:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée du Quai Branly Papouasie Karahut 04032012 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and useful. --NorbertNagel 21:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée du Quai Branly Papouasie Statuette 04032012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:59, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tsjuder Igel Rock Valenciennes 03 03 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A crop that doesn't cut off his guitar would've been better, but good quality nevertheless. --Óðinn 22:11, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cultures précolombiennes MRAH Masque Teotihuacan 01 10 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good to me--Lmbuga 23:30, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cultures précolombiennes MRAH Chimu Hergé 02 10 2011 B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice and very useful ! --Jebulon 21:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soissons Cathedrale Vitraux 01 04 2012 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 19:25, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soissons Cathedrale Vitraux 01 04 2012 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 19:25, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soissons Cathedrale Vitraux 01 04 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:15, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vitraux Saint-Denis 190110 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 19:29, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Vierge à l'enfant en ivoire

Désolé mon cher Vassil,

Tu assures souvent la promotion de mes images, et me voici contraint, pour "jouer le jeu", de contester celle qui est faite de ta "Vierge à l'enfant" en ivoire du Musée Royal... Il y a trois fois des surexpositions sur l'avant bras-droit de la Vierge, sur son genou, et sur l'épaule de l'Enfant Jésus. Les parties un peu sombres sont "bruitées", de surcroît. A mon avis, c'est pour l'instant rédhibitoire en vue d'une promotion. J'espère que tu ne m'en veux pas, c'est avec regret que j'envoie cette photo à l'examen d'autres "reviewers" en "Consensual Review".

Bien amicalement, malgré tout !--Jebulon (talk) 17:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vautour Doué-la-Fontaine 25 04 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 22:33, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abeille charpentière Ré 25 04 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:49, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crane suture metopique 01 04 2012 2 B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--ArildV 09:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MRAH 20112011 Vierge 14eme s Ivoire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chaussure chinoise Saverne 02 05 2012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:06, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame Bar-le-Duc Vitrail Saint Fiacre 30 04 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Jebulon 16:19, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame Bar-le-Duc Vitrail Saint Vincent 30 04 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Jebulon 16:18, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donon 01 05 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 16:20, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame Bar-le-Duc Vitrail 30 04 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:28, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donon Musée 01 05 2012 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Très bien. --Cayambe 07:10, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Permission to use photo of salt evaporation

May I use the photo of salt evaporation? Contact me at sandra.poon@pearson.com

Thanks Sandra Poon Pearson Malaysia

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donon Musée 01 05 2012 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 15:28, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donon Musée 01 05 2012 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, maybe overexposure of the sky could be corrected --Moroder 09:16, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donon Musée 01 05 2012 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, good lighting --Moroder 09:16, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sedan Fauconnerie 20 05 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bird and glove nicely highlighted with good light and adequate DOF. The falconer's shirt has a few blown areas, but I think it is acceptable as it is not the main subject, and it is a white shirt in sunlight for which small blown aeas are hard to avoid whilst getting adequate exposure on the main subjects. --Slaunger 20:23, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Callais Neolithique Musée Vannes 19082012 01.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:40, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Ciboire Cathedrale de Vannes 19082012.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Saint Isidore de Vannes

Bonsoir Vassil, et merci de ton indulgent soutien pour mes images de Ségovie.

J'adore ton crâne d'évêque, très réussi.

J'allais supporter ta statue vannetaise, mais j'ai l'impression que la mise au point s'est faite plutôt sur le mur, qui est net, que sur la statue, qui est un poil floue à mon avis. Qu'en penses-tu ?

Amicalement--Jebulon (talk) 22:54, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Callais Neolithique Musée Vannes 19082012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me.--JLPC 10:34, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crane Tombeau Mgr Bertin Cath Vannes 19O82012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Parfait--Jebulon 14:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Vitrail Notre-Dame de Paris 191208 04 Fuite en Egypte.jpg

Ich habe eben Dein FP File:Vitrail Notre-Dame de Paris 191208 04 Fuite en Egypte.jpg für den 25.12.2012 (1.Weihnachtstag) als "Bild des Tages" eingegeben. Ich hoffe, Du freust Dich darüber. Für den 24.12.2012 (Heilig Abend) fehlt noch ein passendes FP als "Bild des Tages". Dafür habe ich das Bild File:Bramantino - De aanbidding der herders.jpg in FPC eingestellt. Es ist ein ungewöhnliches mittelalterliches Bild mit Understatement (ohne Engel und betende Hände, die sonst in jener Zeit üblich waren). In Stil und Farbgebung wirkt das Bild sehr modern. Das sind die Gründe, warum ich dieses Bild für FP und "Bild des Tages" geeignet finde. Was meinst Du? --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:00, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame de L'Epine 9 12 2012 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me. --JLPC 18:34, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame de L'Epine Vitrail 9 12 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --Rjcastillo 22:40, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame de L'Epine Vitrail 9 12 2012 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:00, 26 December 2012 (UTC) Comment Nice images but I'd suggest a perspective/tilt correction and a little correction of of dark and light tones --Moroder 10:06, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame de L'Epine Vitrail 9 12 2012 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:10, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame de L'Epine 9 12 2012 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SDF Sapin de Noel Paris 27 12 2012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:45, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison de Victor Hugo Paris Vitrail 27122012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:57, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victor Hugo Buste David 27122012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:55, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison de Victor Hugo Paris 27122012 Chambre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Improved version uploaded, thanks to JLPC --Vassil 16:43, 6 January 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 17:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison de Victor Hugo Salon chinois 271220120 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 19:25, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:32, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Location?

Hello Vassil - do you have photo locations for File:Abies alba 0107.jpg, File:Larix decidua 01072.jpg, and other related files, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 22:42, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Also locations for File:Alnus incana 010702.jpg and File:Alnus incana 010703.jpg, please - MPF (talk) 10:35, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

I use some of your photos

Hello Vassil!

I have use some photos of Connochaetes gnu from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)

You can see directly in the follow link and click over "Siguiente" ("Next") several times:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=36038

If you wish, you can send me (via fernando.lison@educa.madrid.org) some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor profile" in Animalandia (In your profile there is a link to your user page in wikimedia):

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Vassil

I want show to my students (and so everybody) that Animalandia is make for "real person", and I can tell them about "generosity", "share" and other similar words that they use very few...

This is my "contributor profile" and others, for example:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Mamen%20Jim%E9nez

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=David%20P%E9rez

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Boris%20Loboda

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Steve%20Garvie%20%28Rainbirder%29

In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón

--Fernando.lison (talk)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saliera Cellini Vienna 18 04 2013 01 B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, especially when you consider that the object is behind glass. --Steindy 23:11, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunsthistorisches Museum 09 04 2013 Vanitas Group 07 B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice --Moroder 23:18, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunsthistorisches Museum 09 04 2013 Vanitas Group 07 B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice --Moroder 23:18, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Megaloceros giganteus Paris 25 05 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Megaloceros giganteus Paris 25 05 2013 01.jpg

Aucun problème, Vassil : j'ai vu que ton image était discutée et que tu n'intervenais pas et j'ai pensé que tu étais absent momentanément. Or la retouche demandée était facile à faire. Très bonne photo, bien entendu. Heureux d'y avoir mis la main à bon escient ! -- Bien cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 13:32, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunsthistorisches Museum 09 04 2013 Female bust Francesco Laurana 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:36, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Paris Gay Pride 2013 003.jpg

File:Paris Gay Pride 2013 003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 07:02, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunsthistorisches Museum 09 04 2013 Drinking horn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 21:17, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunsthistorisches Museum 09 04 2013 Archduke Ferdinand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 04:22, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunsthistorisches Museum 09 04 2013 Medallion William V of Bavaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Delicate subject and work. QI for me, despite some overposed reflections. --Myrabella 06:47, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunsthistorisches Museum 09 04 2013 Allegorical scenes Friedrich Sustris 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 22:06, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dunkleosteus Vienna 22 04 2013 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! British Museum Bronze head Pazuzu B 27072013 BB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 16:35, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museum of London Wax head 06082013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 11:39, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southwark Cathedral stained glass windows 01082013 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:14, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marduk Mortuus Mean 17 08 2013 01.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pyb 05:29, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deströyer 666 Metal Mean 17 08 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 20:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deströyer 666 Metal Mean 17 08 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 20:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vitrail ND Visitation Rochefort Belgique 18082013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:58, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vitrail Rochefort Belgique St François 18082013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 21:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vitrail Rochefort Belgique St Nicolas 18082013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Mattbuck 21:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Creche napolitaine Musee des Beaux Arts Rouen 31082013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:07, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ovis aries Naturhistorisches Museum Basel 27102013 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 23:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pech de Bugarach 27072014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 15:55, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ille-sur-Têt Orgues 27072014 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:38, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Pictures from Kunsthistorisches Museum

Hello! I want to thank you for very high-qulity pictures from Kunsthistorisches Museum. I used them to illustrate my articles in Ukrainian wiki (for example Bacchus und Ariadne, Hl. Gregor mit Schreibern, Aquamanile in Gestalt eines Greifen etc). Do you have more pictures (especially from Collection of Egyptian, Greek and Roman Antiquity and Kunstkammer)? --AnatolyPm (talk) 10:25, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Belemnite opalisée 8127.jpg

I cropped your spectacular opalized belemnite a bit -- I think it brings out the color & fire more. See what you think. And thanks for uploading this great photo! Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 20:58, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

PS: Compare to File:Opalized Peratobelus fossil belemnite, Coober Pedy.jpg

File:Carpeaux Valenciennes 080810 22 Charles Carpeaux.jpg

File:Carpeaux Valenciennes 080810 22 Charles Carpeaux.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

81.135.31.3 00:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Global account

Hi Vassil! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:29, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Effort de mémoire...

Salut Vassil.

Tu as versé des photos du Hellfest 2009. As-tu fait les trois jours, cette année-là ? J'aurai besoin de tes souvenirs pour la page de la prog des HF car j'ai une homonymie sur le groupe Squealer et je ne sais pas si c'est le Sqealer français ou le Squealer allemand qui est venu en 2009. Si tu t'en souviens, ça m'arrangerait beaucoup.

Merci d'avance. --Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 00:08, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Cheer! for You black Metal pictures Moughamir (talk) 17:10, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for the photograph of Cupid which I have used in a self-published book cover. PGB01 (talk) 11:20, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Historisches Museum Basel Totentanz.jpg

Your high resolution detail photos need to be mounted together. I did this today. Because your originals were exactly rectangular, they fit together perfectly. Only the shades of the four parts differ and might need some effort with GIMP or Photoshop. Now every detail can be cut out wiithout loss of precision. This panorama could replace the existing image Bild-Basler Totentanz.jpg of user Pollinosisss. Thank you for your brilliant photos! --GRIPS (talk) 21:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Image attribution

Dear Vassil, I'm currently writing a popular science book about the evolution of locomotion, to be published next year by Basic Books. I would like to include your <Agaricocrinus americanus Carboniferous Indiana.jpg> image: can I just confirm that it is licensed under the CC BY-SA 3.0 license, and may I ask how you would like the work to be attributed? Many thanks, and best wishes, Matt Wilkinson

I should add that my email is mtw210 at googlemail should you wish to discuss anything further. Thanks, Matt

Agaricocrinus americanus Carboniferous Indiana.jpg

Dear Mr Wilkinson, Sorry for the late answer and many thanks for choosing my picture "Agaricocrinus americanus Carboniferous Indiana.jpg" for your book. This picture is under the CC BY-SA 3.0 license. Please credit to Vassil Asjac. Regards, Vassil (talk) 08:47, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Pour la vue de la cathédrale de Laon! Aarp65 (talk) 18:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Palace of Nations Human Rights Geneva 20102014 1.jpg

And also:

• File:Palace of Nations Human Rights Geneva 20102014 2.jpg
• File:Palace of Nations Human Rights Geneva 20102014 3.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 21:43, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Jacques Laudin

Porcelaine signee Laudin.

Bonjour, Vassil et merci pour ton travail que je croise régulièrement. Désolé de te déranger pour un travail aussi ancient, ais-je bien compris quand je range l'image citée dans la quatégorie Jacques Laudin ? Je comprends du texte que ce serait une coupe faite par Laudin dans le style porcelain chinoise ? Cordialement Garitan (talk) 15:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Vassil,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2017 has started

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started It is a world event. The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th. Here you can find more details. This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active and who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...). #WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017 Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 11:15, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Cléo de Mérode Diadème Musée Grévin 10 09 2011.jpg

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vitraux Saint-Denis 190110 18

Bonjour, j'espère que tu vas bien,

J'écris de la part de Trinity University Press (San Antonio, Texas). Nous publions un livre dans lequel il s'agit d'art, et je voudrais utiliser ta photo excellente (ici). As-tu une version de cette photo qui n'est pas JPEG?

Merci beaucoup, --Isaiah Mitchell (talk) 22:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:Zoo_d'Amiens

Zoo d'Amiens has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Achim (talk) 10:29, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Jan Toorop Prowlers 1892 28102016.jpg

@Vassil: since you where the uploader, I was wondering why you describe this image with you as the author? If it is from Jan Toorop he should be author I guess. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 05:30, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Marriage equality demonstration Paris 2013 01 27 31.jpg

File:Marriage equality demonstration Paris 2013 01 27 31.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Your Photo Ming Porcelain

Hello, I just want to inform you that I have used your good photo of Ming Porcelain in my video/ vlog. I make vlog as a hobby. You can watch in youtube yy4g7gNQLlo Thank you kindly for sharing your photo.

Best Regards, S. Toha Stef Toha (talk) 10:28, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for all your great contributions!

What it says. I've added a number of your fine photos to various articles. Best regards, Pete Tillman (talk) 19:19, 25 September 2019 (UTC)