Spiessens

Mrs. Spiessens is dead

• • • I got this message today: "Dear Sir, Frau Nadia Spiessens is unfortunatly dead in may 2016 aged 82. Sorry about that, she was very involved in Wikipedia." Jean-Pierre (his son)." -- Kürschner (talk) 13:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

-- 18:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

File:France 50 francs Le Verrier 01.jpg

Solved.

File:France 5000 francs terre et mer 01.jpg

Solved.

File:France 5000 francs terre et mer 01.jpg

Solved.

File:Denis Diderot by Jean-Baptiste Pigalle.jpg

Solved.

File:Virginius.jpg

Solved

File:Thomen 1910.JPG

Solved

File:Revillon Frères, Rue de Rivoli, Paris.jpg

Solved

Copyright status: File:LPJ 21 février 1904.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:LPJ 21 février 1904.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Solved, --Spiessens (talk) 13:09, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Re;

I know, that's automatic categorization generated by flickr2commons tool. Files in the category Category:L'Espagne are being properly recategorised in the subcategory Category:Illustrations of L'Espagne by Gustave Doré. But, you know, three hundred files... it takes time. Thanks, anyway. Strakhov (talk) 09:47, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

I've just removed the category "Litography" from every remaining file in the by-now-not-so-properly-categorised-category "L'Espagne" with HotCat tool. It keeps needing work, anyways. :( Strakhov (talk) 09:57, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Spiessens. You have new messages at ww2censor's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ww2censor (talk) 14:24, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Vichy stamps

Where do you get the idea that Vichy stamps are any different than other creative products where the designer and engraver hold the copyright per the hatnote you placed in Category:Stamps of Vichy Government. Most (I have not checked them all) are created by the same designers and engravers whose French stamps are still copyright such as File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1941-49.png by Jules Piel or File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1944-3.png by Charles Paul Dufresne. 70 years has not passed since some of these stamps were produced and I am certain most of the designers and engravers did not suddenly die in 1944. Most of these stamps, as I had previously mentioned to you are still in copyright per the talkback link just above this post. Ww2censor (talk) 10:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

• I support this Ww2censor's opinion. It's absolutely premature to upload the French stamps of the 1940s due to the definite copyright issues. --Michael Romanov (talk) 11:12, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Actually I don't think any of these stamps were uploaded by Spiessens. Ww2censor (talk) 13:23, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Indeed Ww2censor ! I won't take any risk to upload those images. But I am still waiting for the answer of La Poste authorities which I am in contact with. Yours, --Spiessens (talk) 14:14, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Printer's marks vs Logos of publishing houses

Bonjour, j'ai vu que tu avais créé une nouvelle catégorie : Category:Printer's marks in France.

Il existe des catégories sous la forme Logos of publishing houses from XXX et d'autres Printer's marks in XXX. Y a-t-il une différence ? Aristoi (talk) 16:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Br Aristoi, je me suis posé la question après avoir créé la première catégorie : historiquement, l'imprimeur est celui qui possède une presse et il applique sa marque au début du codex ; au XIXe siècle, l'éditeur se met à apposé également sa marque (on a certes des imprimeur-éditeurs comme Mame en France mais aussi de simple éditeur qui n'imprime pas), suivant cette vieille tradition de la presse à imprimer. Le logo est un terme générique très moderne, qui à mon humble avis, fait partie d'un concept disons markéting et communication. Dans les logo (inclus dans une charte graphique), on trouve rarement une devise latine, etc. Pour moi la marque c'est comme un sceau de garantie. J'espère t'aider avec cette réponse. --Spiessens (talk) 19:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

J'ai du mal à comprendre, mais si tu t'y retrouves, je te fais confiance. Merci pour ta réponse. Aristoi (talk) 22:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

C'est compliqué, je suis d'accord. En français, le mot éditeur par exemple est confus : c'est à la fois la personne qui publie, la maison d'édition et aussi la personne chargée de préparer un texte (ou un programme informatique, etc.) ! Je trouve l'anglais (et l'allemand) plus précis. Bon courage à vous ! --Spiessens (talk) 06:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:La Palette 1912.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:La Palette 1912.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 13:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello Ta, thks for the message, I just mispelled the PD-70 template. Whatsoever, it is a Gallica Public Domain document... Yours, --Spiessens (talk) 15:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Nicolas Caron

Bonjour ! En créant Category:Nicolas Caron vous avez indiqué que ce graveur entrait dans la catégorie Category:1719 births. Or je lis sur internet que Nicolas Caron est né en 1700 [1], et non en 1719. Quelle est la source de la date que vous avez indiquée ? S'il n'y a pas de source solide, il faudrait rectifier la catégorie de l'année de naissance. Cordialement, Baronnet (talk) 11:20, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Baronnet, merci pour le message ! La source n'est pas très solide c'est le Bénézit (repris par Oxford Press : tome 3 page 264), souvent bourré d'erreurs. Pour l'instant je n'ai rien de mieux, si peu que je n'ai même pas pu compléter l'article idoine sur le Wiki francophone... Cdlt, --Spiessens (talk) 11:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Je vous ai fait une ébauche ici, si vous voulez vous pouvez l'améliorer, merci à vous, S.

Copyright status: File:Glasgow Institute MacNair MacKintosh.pdf

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Glasgow Institute MacNair MacKintosh.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Scoopfinder^(d) 13:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello Scoopfinder, thks but I want it to be erased, it is a mistaken import. --Spiessens (talk) 17:50, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Henri Héran - Spielendes Meerweib.png

And also:

• File:Henri Héran Fleur de mai.png

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 12:12, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Travail des enfants et résurrection des morts?

Bonjour, vous avez absolument raison avec votre remarque sur la photo Charles Brandebourg, j'en doute aussi, mais c'est ce que dit la source. D'ailleurs une autre photo, datée 1868, lui est aussi attribuée par une source plus "officielle". Disons qu'il y avait des gosses qui travaillaient dans les mines, tandis que d'autres faisaient des photos.

Deux photos lui attribuées ont été prises des années après sa mort.

Weird... --Jwh (talk) 09:52, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello Jwh, oui, très étrange... Peut-être aller sur la photothèque officielle de la Bibliothèque du Luxembourg ? --Spiessens (talk) 15:04, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Oui, la phototèque est dans mes projets.

I've so much left to do; I've so little time to fail --Jwh (talk) 21:58, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Ohhh this is magnificent (this motto shall be mine...), regards --Spiessens (talk) 04:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

évidemment pas de moi --Jwh (talk) 14:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Le Canard sauvage 19 Fersen.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Le Canard sauvage 19 Fersen.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I try to add {{PD-GallicaScan}} but it doesn't work well. The template is here, can you help ? Yours, --Spiessens (talk) 14:22, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

It's done ! Sorry, --Spiessens (talk) 15:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Marguerite Delorme La Poupée 1898.png

File:Marguerite Delorme La Poupée 1898.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 11:53, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Louis Borgex Les Sardinières.png

File:Louis Borgex Les Sardinières.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Emmepici (talk) 12:33, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Turban Legroux Soeur - illustration Demachy janvier 1944.jpg

File:Turban Legroux Soeur - illustration Demachy janvier 1944.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 01:58, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Camille de Sainte-Croix.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 14:11, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Delphi Fabrice Citrouillot Méricant 239.png

File:Delphi Fabrice Citrouillot Méricant 239.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 04:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Pierre Girieud autoportrait.jpg

File:Pierre Girieud autoportrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 04:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Medeleine Carpentier autoportrait.png

File:Medeleine Carpentier autoportrait.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 11:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Lévy-Dhurmer Belle d'antan.jpg

Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 21:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

File:De Paris à la mer.jpg

File:De Paris à la mer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 10:01, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

File:La femme à Paris.JPG

File:La femme à Paris.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 10:02, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:SP 10 Henri Rivière Enoch & Cie The Studio 68 july 1898.jpg

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ^💬 17:07, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Waterman Rapeno.JPG

File:Waterman Rapeno.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrightRaven (talk) 10:24, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Porteurs de socca Nice.jpg

File:Porteurs de socca Nice.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:32, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Vigo et Kaufman Nice.jpg

File:Vigo et Kaufman Nice.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Pearson Without Strapline Blue RGB HiRes.png

Yours sincerely, SCP-2000 02:51, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Paul Jouve Le jugement de Pâris.png

Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 14:41, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Rigaud Air embaumé 1931.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 15:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Charles Huard Les Pêcheurs.png

File:Charles Huard Les Pêcheurs.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

WεFt (talk) 06:45, 19 October 2023 (UTC)