User:ComputerHotline/Archive 1

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Colias croceus (Clouded Yellow).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info - I was going to nominate a picture of mine but then I saw this one, which is much better -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

•  Support Satisfies all criteria. Walter Siegmund (talk) 01:57, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 09:08, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Papilio machaon (Common Swallowtail ).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Really good, but i like this one more. --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Support The contrasting background and the flower that it is feeding upon make it the most valuable, I think. Walter Siegmund (talk) 02:35, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 09:10, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Thomas Bresson - Machaon-1 (by).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thomas Bresson - Machaon-1 (by).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 01:20, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Richard Stallman.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support It's ok for me, but the file should have a descriptive name. --Eusebius (talk) 15:59, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment @Eusebius : What do you want to say ? There is already a description in image page. -- ComputerHotline (talk) 17:53, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I just want to say that "Titles of media files should be meaningful, helpful and correct in the language chosen" (Commons:Naming policy) and "Photo 035" doesn't say much about the picture. But it is only a remark: it is part of the requirements for QI, but not here (for the moment), so it doesn't affect my vote. --Eusebius (talk) 19:55, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment this aught to be moved to Most valued reviews. --J.smith (talk) 18:03, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Already the case. --Eusebius (talk) 19:55, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Support - this one --Pudelek (talk) 13:09, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

1. ComputerHotline - Richard Stallman (by-sa) (12).jpg: -1 <--
2. Thomas Bresson - Photo 035 (by-sa).jpg: +2
=>
File:ComputerHotline - Richard Stallman (by-sa) (12).jpg: Declined. <--
File:Thomas Bresson - Photo 035 (by-sa).jpg: Promoted.

--Eusebius (talk) 21:54, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Valued images

Hi. Please read COM:VISC and COM:VICR thoroughly before nominating images. Thank you. Lycaon (talk) 12:55, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Pieride1-1 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pontia daplidice (Bath White).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria ok to me. I took the liberty to add the link in the scope. --Eusebius (talk) 13:56, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Description is still lacking IMO. Lycaon (talk) 15:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Better now? I also took the liberty to add in the scope the vernacular name I found in the english article (I see that more as formatting than as a real scope change). --Eusebius (talk) 16:48, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Since you've fixed it, I'll support. --Acarpentier 07:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 15:21, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panthera tigris altaica.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support The best one according to me, maybe with this one. --Eusebius (talk) 10:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support The one that Eusebius looks not naturally. Therefore my support for this one. --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:01, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. GIPE25 - Tiger (by).jpg: +2 <--
2. Tiger colchester.jpg: 0
=>
File:GIPE25 - Tiger (by).jpg: Promoted. <--
File:Tiger colchester.jpg: Declined.

--Eusebius (talk) 21:29, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Machaons (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments that's good --Böhringer 22:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ComputerHotline - Machaons (by).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ComputerHotline - Machaons (by).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

TUSC token c077dc1da6b94524175183053f703b77

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Ruines-fort1 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I might be wrong, shouldn't it be tilted to the right just a bit (window in the back and top horizontal part) ? --Coyau 16:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC) --- @Coyau : No. It's the real vision. --ComputerHotline 18:38, 24 February 2009 (UTC) couldn't you kill the balustrade? *g* --Mbdortmund 15:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Picromerus bidens (feeding).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• (Link to previous reviews)
•  Comment It appears the reason that this image failed the previous nomination was simply the scope was too broad, the helpful reviewers didn't bother to suggest a suitable scope - so having read some of the many, many directions I have re-nominated with what I think is a suitable scope.

 Info Many sheild bugs are vegetarian so a picture of the feeding habits of this species is significant. There appears to only be one other image that could contest for this nomination and that is File:Picromerus_bidens_mit_Beute.jpg which has a few things going for it, but is not as good as this one for illustrating the bugs feeding technique. --Tony Wills (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Not geo-located. Lycaon (talk) 11:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Info @Lycaon : It's geolocated. --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Question Aren't the colours more natural in this version? Other criteria look ok. --Eusebius (talk) 13:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

 Comment No. This image is the real scene. -- ComputerHotline (talk) 14:48, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

I assume you know better than me. --Eusebius (talk) 16:32, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Support OK for me, provided colours are the natural ones. --Eusebius (talk) 16:32, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Since you've geolocated it. --Acarpentier 17:58, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Please add a list where the image is used (not compulsory, but if it is used it is handy). And similarly for all your other noms. Lycaon (talk) 21:11, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Whose other nom.s? --Tony Wills (talk) 06:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
    • Sorry, that was confusing ;-). This was meant @ComputerHotline of course, but misplaced (and yet proper) here :-P -- Lycaon (talk) 07:08, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
      • ;-). Actually the toolserver was playing up when I originally submitted this so the only usage I could find was the stub article on en:wp which hardly seemed worth mentioning. But it is in fact used in a variety of places. --Tony Wills (talk) 10:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
        • Great! Thanks :-). Lycaon (talk) 10:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 16:26, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

• This was posted to my talk page ages ago, but I think it is more sensibly posted here :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 19:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Salb-1 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Correct composition, good enough quality -- Alvesgaspar 00:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Stal-2 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - entree (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sehr ausgewogen und gleichmäßig beleuchtet. Symmetrischer Aufbau. Fingalo 19:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Photographe

Bonsoir monsieur,

Merci pour votre sympathique message. En effet, par celui-ci vous m’encouragez à continuer ma collaboration, à faire découvrir, mais aussi à partager ma passion pour la photographie.

N.B. En parcourant votre jolie galerie de photographies, j'ai vu que nous avions le même amour pour la nature et toutes les beautés que celle-ci offre à notre regard.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 18:41, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Liens dans les descriptions

Bonjour, tout d'abord je suis un fan de tes photos félicitations! Elles sont chouettes, tu donnes de la richesse à commons et d'une manière plus générale à tout les wikis. Je ne sais pas si tu as vu par contre, sur tes images qui sont présentées aux featured pitures, je rajoute des liens vers Wikipédia et Species. En fait ça part d'une idée simple, imaginons que je tombe par hasard sur la photo en tapant "rouge" par exemple, je tombe sur ta photo File:ComputerHotline - Ibis rouge (by).jpg mais cette photo ne me dit pas plus ce que c'est malheureusement. les liens dans la description, m'y aideront.

Ou bien imaginons, je suis un spécialiste de l'Ibis rouge. J'ai cherché des photos et je suis tombé sur la tienne. Par curiosité je vais voir ce lien écrit sur l'Ibis rouge. je me retrouve sur Wikipédia. S'il y une erreur peut être que j'améliorai WP.

De plus, procéder ainsi améliore les moteurs de recherche, en effet il associent le texte aux images. Un lien permettrait donc aux moteurs de recherche d'être plus pertinent (sans se tromper surtout avec les cas d'homonymie). Vous pouvez également vous inspirer de Luc Viatour qui le fait après m'avoir vu dans sa liste de suivi apparemment (Exemple). Cordialement, Otourly (talk) 19:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Pelecanus crispus (by) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Some CA in the wing. A QI nevertheless. --Siipikarja 10:25, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Vautour moine (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Ianare 20:38, 18 April 2009 (UTC)  Support Minor overexposure in the tree stump and in the tail, but still a QI. --Siipikarja 10:21, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Tourelle (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments interesting picture, good solution of the difficult light-conditions --Mbdortmund 20:09, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Lavoir (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice colors and good composition --Lucarelli 23:32, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GIPE25 - Cigognes dans leur nid (by-sa).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good momentPro2 16:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Boulangerie (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments First I thought it's tilted, but it isen't. There is small barrel distortion but i think it is still QI --Berthold Werner 08:51, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ComputerHotline - Pelecanus crispus (by) (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ComputerHotline - Pelecanus crispus (by) (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Entree (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fits the QI criteria. --Coyau 02:26, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Gastrophysa viridula-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Best of the set, correct camera settings --Ianare 18:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coreus marginatus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support OK for me. --Eusebius (talk) 11:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 09:52, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Pyrrhosoma nymphula-1 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Petite nymphe au corps de feu-2 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good! kallerna 19:17, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Agrion élégant (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice shot. kallerna 19:17, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Agrion jouvencelle (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image. --kallerna 13:09, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Coenagrion puella copulation (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done --kallerna 13:09, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Thomas Bresson - Agrion élégant (by).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thomas Bresson - Agrion élégant (by).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ischnura elegans (Blue-tailed Damselfly).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Clearest photo in the category. Jolly Janner (talk) 15:59, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment Please format scope according to scope guidelines. Lycaon (talk) 13:54, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

 Done Jolly Janner (talk) 15:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 11:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Petite nymphe au corps de feu-5 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crop could be tighter, but otherwise nice. --kallerna 11:51, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Cour (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Ianare 21:56, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Stalactites (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments cool --Ianare 21:54, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Acces-est (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Entree-principale (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CCW tilt (l'image penche un peu à gauche...), but otherwise good quality. -- MJJR 21:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Libellula depressa-6 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Mbdortmund 00:34, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brenthis ino by Thomas Bresson.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Ianare 12:40, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Calopteryx virgo-1 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 23:38, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

The Butterfly Barnstar

		The Butterfly Barnstar
		Thank You for a lots of very successful photos of insects! :) --George Chernilevsky (talk) 12:45, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Thomas Bresson - Libellula depressa-6 (by).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thomas Bresson - Libellula depressa-6 (by).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Thomas Bresson - Calopteryx virgo-1 (by).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thomas Bresson - Calopteryx virgo-1 (by).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Calopteryx splendens-3 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good QI. It is hard object for a photographers --George Chernilevsky 14:54, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Symp-nerv (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 19:23, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calopteryx virgo (Beautiful Demoiselle) female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I formatted the scope according to the guidelines. I am not competent to vote on this scope. Yann (talk) 18:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

•  Support I further formatted the scope according to the guidelines. Male and female are visibly distinguishable in this species (sexual dichromatism), so a female subscope seems warranted. All criteria are met IMO. Lycaon (talk) 07:25, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 10:05, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Libellula quadrimaculata (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. QI --LC-de 14:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Symp-fons-2 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --LC-de 09:06, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Ishn-eleg-2 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good shot --George Chernilevsky 10:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Libellula quadrimaculata-3 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Maedin 19:13, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Orth-albis-2 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --kallerna 17:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Thomas Bresson - Ishn-eleg-2 (by).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thomas Bresson - Ishn-eleg-2 (by).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argynnis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --kallerna 14:44, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Enallagma cyathigerum (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO FP-material. --kallerna 14:45, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Ruines-fort2 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just above the 2 MP limit but good. --Iotatau 10:08, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Thomas Bresson - Enallagma cyathigerum (by).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thomas Bresson - Enallagma cyathigerum (by).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Cour-du-fort (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Ianare 05:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macroglossum stellatarum (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly soft but great subject, good composition and colors. --Iotatau 20:04, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Araneus diadematus (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Mbdortmund 11:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Eclairs-1 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done, albeit the overly long exposure. -- H005 16:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Foudre-4 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good Abigor 20:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Citron-1 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Böhringer 21:38, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Lib-quad-1 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 07:55, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Lib-quad-3 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good showing wings --George Chernilevsky 07:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Lib-quad-5 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks ok to me. --Eusebius 21:13, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ComputerHotline - Syrphidae sp. (by) (3).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ComputerHotline - Syrphidae sp. (by) (3).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Anisoptera (4) (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments More or less flawless. --Ferengi 08:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Fort-salb-8 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great detail, nice green tint. --Ferengi 06:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Citadelle de Belfort (by) (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Amazing colors and detail, good perspective. --Ferengi 19:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vanessa cardui (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! --kallerna 15:14, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vanessa cardui (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! --kallerna 15:14, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

New FP

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Thomas Bresson - Citron-1 (by).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thomas Bresson - Citron-1 (by).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Citadelle de Belfort (by) (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --kallerna 13:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Sympetrum sanguineum (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --kallerna 13:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Anisoptera (2) (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentFLICKR sourced Gnangarra 14:16, 24 July 2009 (UTC) ---- Like all of my images. --ComputerHotline 17:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)} QI, the author is a Wikipedian --Mbdortmund 09:57, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Tour de la Miotte (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Ferengi 11:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Pieris brassicae (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- Korall 14:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Leste-vert-2 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --kallerna 18:02, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Leste-vert-3 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --kallerna 18:02, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Leste-vert-4 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --kallerna 18:02, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ComputerHotline - Pieris brassicae (by).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ComputerHotline - Pieris brassicae (by).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Karel (talk) 21:23, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Syrphidae sp. (by) (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 20:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Apis mellifera (by) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 20:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Symp-rouge-sang-2 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --kallerna 07:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de Vezelois (by) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Interesting, but the tube light spoils it. Yann 15:13, 13 August 2009 (UTC) * Support quality is fine, the light doesn't bother me. --Ianare 20:02, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de Vezelois (by) (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. Yann 16:16, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Syrphidae sp. (by) (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good one -- Korall 18:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Apis mellifera (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Ianare 19:55, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Alveoles pleines de pollen (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ça l'air délicieux ! --Ianare 19:55, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Vespidae sp. (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good angle --Ianare 19:55, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Syrphidae sp. (by) (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it. Abigor 18:15, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de Vezelois (by) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Argiope bruennichi (by) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 07:04, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort du Bois d-Oye (by) (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good composition --Ianare 03:56, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Chrysops relictus (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Ianare 03:43, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ComputerHotline - Chalcolestes viridis (by).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ComputerHotline - Chalcolestes viridis (by).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:14, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Aeshna cyanea-1 (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --George Chernilevsky 14:35, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Sympetrum striolatum (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent --George Chernilevsky 13:57, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Tachina fera (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Korall 18:59, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Araneus diadematus (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good sharpness, colors, good EV - QI --Vladanr 16:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Araneus diadematus (by) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit low DOF, but ok. --kallerna 19:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Thomas Bresson - Aeshna cyanea-1 (by).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thomas Bresson - Aeshna cyanea-1 (by).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 17:56, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Thomas Bresson - Tachina fera (by).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thomas Bresson - Tachina fera (by).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 17:59, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Danaus plexippus (by) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 13:32, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

“Photographers Blackbelt”

Bonsoir Thomas,

Merci de m’avoir décerné la “Photographers Blackbelt”. Ton appréciation me fait vraiment plaisir.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 19:16, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Je fais de même, merci de m’avoir décerné la “Photographers Blackbelt”. Je prépare depuis un certains temps toute une nouvelle série sur les flying legends (show aérien d'avions militaires historiques) et la fighter collection... mais ironiquement, depuis que je suis admin sur le wiki Fr, je suis totalement débordé de travail dans la vie active, du coup, pas de grosses modifs sur commons pour moi ces temps-ci ! La blackbelt devrait me motiver un peu plus ! --Jmrosier (dit Ampon) (talk) 21:45, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Salut, je te remercie moi aussi, c'est très apprécié. --Bgag (talk) 23:13, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Bonjour, merci beaucoup. Tu me fais trop d'honneur. Toujours est-il que ca fait plaisir. Mais, lorsque je vois la qualité de toutes tes photos promues, je me dis qu'il faut que j'améliore la qualité des miennes. A bientot. CaptainHaddock (talk) 14:01, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

“Photographers Blackbelt” 2

Merci for the Photographers Blackbelt" you awarded to me. Month are gone since my last visit here at commons. Maybe that was a good reminder and I will share again some pictures with the community. Thanks a lot! --Simonizer (talk) 08:46, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Merci bien pour la ceinture noire, ça sera ma seconde! Le problème c'est que je ne suis plus très active à Commons FPC et QI. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:43, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for admitting me to the club too :-). I am currently cataloging a few thousand photos, might upload some more soon :-). I have a new (used!) camera, but can only afford a very old and dirty lens ... but things are coming along. One day i will produce some great photos ;-) --Tony Wills (talk) 21:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Well thanks! I've almost given up on ever receiving an award :-( ... ;-) --Dschwen (talk) 23:03, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Lepidoptera sp. (by) (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp, good colour, OK composition. --Relic38 16:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Chalcolestes viridis (by) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments DOF very shallow, but appropriate in this case. Maedin 10:01, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Chalcolestes viridis (by) (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good enough IMO --Cayambe 20:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Photographers Blackbelt (answer)

Un grand merci ;) --Luc Viatour (talk) 09:24, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Photographers Blackbelt

Bonjour, Merci, ça fait plaisir ! Yann (talk) 10:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Fort du Salbert-10 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good --George Chernilevsky 19:17, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Fort du Salbert-8 (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. Yann 17:46, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Chalcolestes viridis (by) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like this image.--Mbz1 02:28, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Récompense

Ah merci pour ta récompense, cela fait plaisir :) C'est parce que j'ai passé les milles imports d'images aussi? Guérin Nicolas ^(messages) 13:59, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ComputerHotline - Caelifera sp. (by).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ComputerHotline - Caelifera sp. (by).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 18:00, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

POTD

Bonjour,

Je pense qu'il serait préférable de varier les sujets... et les photographes, même si tes photos d'insectes sont très belles. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:30, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ComputerHotline - Danaus plexippus (by) (3).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ComputerHotline - Danaus plexippus (by) (3).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 15:51, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ComputerHotline - Lepidoptera sp. (by) (30).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ComputerHotline - Lepidoptera sp. (by) (30).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 15:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Sympetrum sanguineum-11 (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 07:10, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Chalcolestes viridis-10 (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 12:26, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Sympetrum sanguineum-10 (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Cesco77 13:38, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Fort du Salbert-3 (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --George Chernilevsky 20:09, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Lepidoptera sp. (by) (34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Intersting -- H005 20:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Physalis sp.-1 (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For garden plants ID enough, quality is good --George Chernilevsky 08:28, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Physalis sp. (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For garden plants ID enough, quality is good --George Chernilevsky 08:28, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Tachina fera-4 (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Korall 17:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Chalcolestes viridis-20 (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 09:51, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Sympetrum striolatum-3 (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Korall 17:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Sympetrum striolatum-16 (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments interesting composition --Mbdortmund 22:49, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Papilionidae sp. (by) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- JovanCormac 11:25, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Bravo! Belle image du jour

Félicitation Thomas, belle image du jour sur Commons ;) --Luc Viatour (talk) 14:49, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Merci à vous. --ComputerHotline (talk) 15:46, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Je joins mes félicitations à celles de Luc ! Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 18:01, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Merci à vous. --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:07, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - O.B. (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't know who he is, but this is a quality image whoever he is. Very clear. --99of9 12:41, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Agree with 99of9.--Cayambe 14:02, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Chalcolestes viridis (by) (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Chalcolestes viridis (by) (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Would benefit from cloning away the structures at the left bottom.--Cayambe 08:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Chalcolestes viridis (by) (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 07:37, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Chalcolestes viridis (by) (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:08, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Chalcolestes viridis (by) (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Cayambe 08:08, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort du Salbert (by) (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 18:24, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Water droplet (by) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like this one --Mbdortmund 10:59, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Water droplet (by) (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice one ! -- Grez 21:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de la Justice (by) (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sensible use of HDR -- Smial 23:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de la Justice (by) (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sensible use of HDR -- Smial 23:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de la Justice (by) (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sensible use of HDR -- Smial 23:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de la Justice (by) (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sensible use of HDR -- Smial 23:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort du Salbert (by) (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. (In spite of some overexposed regions at the right image border.) --Johannes Robalotoff 20:24, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - sas (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 12:03, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - couloir-salle-a1 (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - stalactite-1 (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 16:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - stalactite (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 16:32, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - detail-porte-blindee (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 12:57, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - cables (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Thomas Bresson - Fort de Roppe (15) (by).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thomas Bresson - Fort de Roppe (15) (by).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:06, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Fort de Roppe (abri-caverne) (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting. Was this made with flash? --kallerna 13:06, 26 December 2009 (UTC) ---- Yes. --ComputerHotline 18:36, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Thomas Bresson - Fort de Roppe (abri-caverne) (by).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thomas Bresson - Fort de Roppe (abri-caverne) (by).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Lepidoptera sp. (by) (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice. Meets the QI-criteria. --High Contrast 18:26, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Mosaique-ecl-lune-20091231 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Of course. --MattiPaavola 20:18, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Fort du Salbert-24 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High-quality photo --George Chernilevsky 17:37, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Fort du Salbert-23 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and interesting. --Cayambe 17:52, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Fort du Salbert-22 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 17:40, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Fort du Salbert-20 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 17:48, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pano-fl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Creation-goutte-eau-redim (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Creative, useful and well done sequence. --Iotatau 20:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Stalactite-5 (by).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Cayambe 09:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Stalactite at the Salbert hill fortifications-2 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Exceptional view of the formation of aragonite Archaeodontosaurus

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Stalactite at the Salbert hill fortifications (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done photo! --George Chernilevsky 18:30, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Lac du Malsaucy (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 18:28, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Thomas Bresson - Creation-goutte-eau-redim (by).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thomas Bresson - Creation-goutte-eau-redim (by).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:07, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - A36 (by) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting view --Carschten 18:40, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

International Photoworkshop

Hello, motivated by the six Fotoworkshops of the German Wikipedia an international Photoworkshop in the Swedish Nyköping will be launched during the Easter Weekend 2010. Nyköping was chosen since Skavsta Airport is a Ryanair Base and very close to Stockholm. Further information can be found on Commons:Photoworkshop_Nyköping_2010. --Prolineserver (talk) 06:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - KL-Natzweiler (by) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good --Pudelek 16:05, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Granges-sur-Vologne church (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! --Berthold Werner 18:19, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Belfort (by) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Pudelek 16:05, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Insecte-mort-13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Yann 10:15, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dead insect-14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Yann 10:15, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chambre antenne S4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 07:59, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Fort du Salbert-29 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 07:57, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Fort du Salbert-26 (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. Please try to review about as many images as you submit (today about 25 in a row). --Iotatau 18:39, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dead insect (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, subject sufficiently sharp. Some indication of scale in the description would be useful. --Avenue 09:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC) ---- Done. --ComputerHotline 09:57, 7 March 2010 (UTC) Thanks. --Avenue 16:39, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dead insect (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for these small objects. --Ikar.us 11:37, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de Roppe (by) (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 07:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Bresson - Castle of Belfort (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Insecte-mort-13.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Insecte-mort-13.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Chiroptera sp. (by) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --kallerna 14:02, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de Roppe (by) (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment enough DOF for major subject components on the plane of focus. Fred Hsu 21:51, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de Roppe (by) (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de Bourlemont (by) (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --George Chernilevsky 13:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de Bourlemont (by) (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. Usefull for "Commons".--Jebulon 16:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de Bourlemont (by).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Jovianeye 20:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de Bourlemont (by) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Pudelek 11:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Iced Dew droplet (by) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The most interesting of the three, IMO. QI for me.----Jebulon 22:58, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de Bourlemont (by) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good. --Berthold Werner 17:16, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de Bourlemont (by) (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Berthold Werner 17:16, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de Bourlemont (by) (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Ianare 23:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Fort de Bourlemont (by) (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice view --Ianare 23:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

[[File:|75px|center]]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments tu as bien progressé ... --Ianare 23:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casernement.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI IMO --Croucrou 20:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casernement de gorge (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI For Me --Croucrou 20:25, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casernement de gorge (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI For Me --Croucrou 20:25, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ComputerHotline - Iced Dew droplet (by) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, QI to me. --Avenue 00:14, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ComputerHotline - Fort de Bourlemont (by) (8).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ComputerHotline - Fort de Bourlemont (by) (8).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:02, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Barthelemy church of Gérardmer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp, good exposure and framing, QI --Croucrou 07:47, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water droplets.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very strange picture. Diamonds ? I don't know if it is an "absolute" QI, but it is QI for me, cause I'm fascinated --Jebulon 23:00, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water droplet (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture! --Dein Freund der Baum 21:08, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Formicidae sp (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good and informative --Ianare 03:35, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anthocharis-cardamines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good!--Mbz1 17:08, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort de Roppe (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good light and perspective study, IMO. --Jebulon 17:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Light painting

Bonjour Thomas, La catégorie Light painting commence à être très assez largement peuplée, et tu est en train d'y développer un véritable thème en soi. Aussi, je te propose de créer une sous-catégorie pour mieux le faire apparaître, et je suggère un libellé assez général, par exemple "Urban exploration in light painting". Si tu en es d'accord, je peux m'en occuper. --Myrabella (talk) 09:13, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour. Selon moi, elle n'est pas si peuplée que cela. D'autres le sont davantage. Cependant, si cela vous arrange, faites le classement que vous proposer. --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:53, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

OK, je vais m'en charger et vous tiendrai informé. Par ailleurs, excusez-moi d'avoir adopté d'emblée le tutoiement, pratique assez usuelle sur cet espace — peut être préférez-vous aussi que l'on utilise votre pseudo plutôt que votre prénom ? Si vous me permettez une question supplémentaire, exposez-vous vos photos sur tirage papier, ou prévoyez-vous de le faire pour cette série ? --Myrabella (talk) 10:06, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

"préférez-vous aussi que l'on utilise votre pseudo plutôt que votre prénom ?" Peu m'importe. "exposez-vous vos photos sur tirage papier" Pas encore. "prévoyez-vous de le faire pour cette série ?" Je n'en sais rien. --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:42, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done Nouvelle categorie créée : Category:Urban exploration with light painting. Il existe effectivement des catégories bien plus peuplées (celle-ci notamment :-) mais votre recherche photographique sur le thème est intéressante, et se rapproche d'un courant qui fait l'objet de travaux publiés (ex. [[1]], [[2]], qui ne sont que des exemples piochés rapidement). --Myrabella (talk) 12:51, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ouvrage-g (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI and Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:18, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ouvrage-g-ent-mat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments goog exposure, sharp QI IMO --Croucrou 19:42, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Couloir-casern-princ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp, good DOF, good exposure, QI IMO --Croucrou 14:46, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obs-cuirasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and very good idea QI IMO --Croucrou 17:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Love the atmosphere, sharp, QI. Description could be better. --Letartean 18:27, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entree-fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:55, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort de Roppe (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Ianare 17:53, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 13:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Anthocharis-cardamines.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anthocharis-cardamines.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:02, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort de Roppe - casernement betonne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 17:19, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Automobile light trails.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 21:27, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danaus plexippus (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 09:20, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danaus plexippus (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 09:18, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danaus chrysippus (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 21:29, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danaus chrysippus (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --High Contrast 16:48, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papilio palinurus (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 21:33, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lepidoptera sp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:14, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Danaus_chrysippus_(1)_edit.png

I'm not quite sure about the new shadow for the leaf on the stem, and a few of the edits of the bokeh, so I've uploaded as PNG so that others can easily modify. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:32, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort de Roppe - casernement betonne (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 07:34, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort de Roppe - reseau souterrain (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 07:34, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort de Roppe - reseau souterrain (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 07:34, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort de Roppe - abri-caverne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good series of pictures IMO. --Cayambe 07:34, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

L'Oedemeridae

Pour moi c'est Oedemera nobilis (scopoli) un beau mâle. Je suggère de le rajouter...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:21, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Oui, mais je ne suis pas sûr de l'ID. --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:56, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Cette hésitation t'honore mais si les femelles peuvent parfois poser problème les mâle sont vraiment typique.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:04, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Maimbœuf church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really excellent. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:28, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Etang du Ruderop-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good image. --Cayambe 11:56, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

FPC careless reviews

Hi Thomas, You may be interested in participatin in this_discussion. Cheers, Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:32, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calopteryx splendens (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 08:49, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platycnemis pennipes (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 08:50, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calopteryx splendens (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me and useful --Archaeodontosaurus 12:09, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danaus plexippus (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Ianare 08:24, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Floods in QI

You might be interested in an ongoing discussion regarding QI floods of late, here. Cheers, ianaré (talk) 19:27, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papilio palinurus (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Ianare 06:00, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Danaus plexippus (7).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Danaus plexippus (7).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:06, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Papilio palinurus (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Papilio palinurus (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:10, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platycnemis pennipes (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrrhosoma nymphula (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:30, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calopteryx splendens (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Ianare 21:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calopteryx splendens (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would like to be able to take such pictures...--Jebulon 09:20, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oedemeridae sp (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort de Roppe (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --George Chernilevsky 19:08, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort de Roppe (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 19:10, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Libellula quadrimaculata (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 19:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Libellula quadrimaculata (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 12:34, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epitheca bimaculata (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 12:35, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Les punaises

tes punaises sont Eurydema ornata (souvent confundues avec pyrochorus apteris), je vais placer ta photo comme référence dans WK elle est bien meileure que celle qui est déjà... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:39, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort de Roppe (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 13:57, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Saint-Maimbœuf church.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint-Maimbœuf church.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 15:01, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enallagma cyathigerum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epitheca bimaculata (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. Lycaon 21:10, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epitheca bimaculata (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort de Roppe (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. Mattbuck 02:35, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

FYI

I mentioned you here. Regards.--10:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort de Roppe (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:46, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coreus marginatus (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feu1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coul-entree-nord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --George Chernilevsky 19:09, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platycnemis pennipes (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aglais urticae (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 14:18, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aglais urticae (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apis mellifera (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 14:22, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orthetrum albistylum (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. Please, help the nominators with trying to give different names of nominations (same name, same time, same date... Mistakes are possible). A simple number would be sufficient. Thank you.--Jebulon 16:40, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Localisation image

Bonjour. Serait-il possible de localiser les photos que vous avez déposé dans commons et qui sont maintenant présentes dans Category:Forests in France. Cela permettrait une meilleure catégorisation de ces images. Merci d'avance. Mel22 (talk) 19:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Fait. --ComputerHotline (talk) 15:13, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Merci. Mel22 (talk) 19:20, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eclairs1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments interesting --Mbdortmund 12:01, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort du Salbert - showers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 10:25, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort du Salbert (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Mbdortmund 12:01, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calopteryx splendens (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Carschten 10:25, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

FP

Bonjour, Thomas!
Maintenant on utilise les nouvelles règles. On permet seulement 2 nominations actives FP.
Bien amicalement -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Blackbelt

Merci pour cette reconnaissance Thomas. Venant d'un photographe aguerri comme toi, c'est particulièrement flatteur! --Cephas (talk) 20:40, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eclairs2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noise is pretty obvious, but a cool night pic, I'm not complaining. --King of Hearts 05:48, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Your uploads to Category Unidentified Anisoptera

Bonjour Computer-Upload,

as my French is pretty lousy, I try English: I see a number of uploads you did in the category Unidentified_Anisoptera. Many seem to be works of other people. Without identification, they are hard to find and to use, therefore I try to identify unidentified Odonata and Orthoptera from time to time (as long as I have the time ;-). But here: Several of the photos you uploaded, carry no information at all. That makes it hard, if not impossible to identify them. What is the reason you uploaded such photos?

Yours, G-u-t (talk) 08:34, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

I don't enough knowledges to identify all species of odonata. --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:27, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort-13-49-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 08:22, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Libellule-15-04-26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 15:56, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Libellule-14-45-07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. The category:Macro Photography should be removed (overcategorisation). --Cayambe 08:03, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episyrphus balteatus-2010-07-15 18-08-14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 11:47, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort-11-26-55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI now --Archaeodontosaurus 06:04, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volucella pellucens-2010-07-15 17-22-40.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent, despite the flash--Lmbuga 19:45, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort-09-41-58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 12:17, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort-10-45-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 12:18, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort-14-16-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 12:20, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort-13-30-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 12:24, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort-13-52-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 12:26, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

QIP floods

Hi, it would be great if you could restrict the amount of Quality Image Promotions you list at a time. I see you've recently listed even as much as more than ten at a time. There is not set daily or weekly limit, but according to this discussion, the community would like smaller bunches. Long lists of similar images seem to have a wearying effect on reviewers. Pitke (talk) 12:28, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort-14-06-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI IMHO. —Jagro 22:58, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-46-35-f-mutzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. The lens flare is a minor distraction. --Pitke 14:04, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-19-25-f-mutzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 16:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-23-43-f-mutzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 16:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-44-f-mutzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 19:12, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort-14-14-51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. Rama 13:02, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2010-07-30-pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:45, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2010-07-30 14-11-23-lib.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lighting could be better, but still good. --Quartl 18:05, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2010-07-30 14-21-47-ar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments In parts a little oof, but still good. --Quartl 18:05, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2010-07-30 14-36-42-ar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dramatic – the damselfly is Ischnura elegans. --Quartl 18:05, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2010-07-30 14-36-51-ar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The spider is really impressive. --Quartl 18:12, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-20-22-fort-mont-bart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 17:38, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

OI L'erreur

Bonjour Thomas!
Tu as fait trois Promotion sans signature. Corrige cela s'il vous plaît.
Très amical --George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:14, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Misumena vatia‎

Merci pour ta promotion de cette araignée, ce qui me touche d'autant plus que tu es connaisseur en la matière. J'ai bien essayé d'aller dans les champs avec mon matériel mais je n'y arrive pas! Alors je ramène les insectes dans mon labo où je maitrise mieux les paramètres. Mais je reste frustré et admiratif des photos « in vivo » que tu maîtrise si bien. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:18, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11-36-02-batterie-roches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Mbdortmund 15:54, 6 August 2010 (UTC)