Commons:Deletion requests/2024/08/01
_logo_(2).svg){kind=link}
August 1
edit
Taken from their website which is all rights reserved. 186.172.188.169 00:29, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- @186.172.188.169: I did not find earlier upload in a reverse image search. Link please? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sculpture Cor-ten
editThere is no frredom in panorama in Greece, confer COM:FOP Greece. The sculpture has been created by Giogros “George” Zongolopoulos who died in 2004. Hence his artwork is not free until 2075.
- File:Cor-ten (1).jpg
- File:Γλυπτό ΔΕΘ (1966), Γιώργος Ζογγολόπουλος, Πλατεία Σιντριβανίου, Θεσσαλονίκη.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
,_%CE%93%CE%B9%CF%8E%CF%81%CE%B3%CE%BF%CF%82_%CE%96%CE%BF%CE%B3%CE%B3%CE%BF%CE%BB%CF%8C%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%85%CE%BB%CE%BF%CF%82,_%CE%A0%CE%BB%CE%B1%CF%84%CE%B5%CE%AF%CE%B1_%CE%A3%CE%B9%CE%BD%CF%84%CF%81%CE%B9%CE%B2%CE%B1%CE%BD%CE%AF%CE%BF%CF%85,_%CE%98%CE%B5%CF%83%CF%83%CE%B1%CE%BB%CE%BF%CE%BD%CE%AF%CE%BA%CE%B7.jpg){kind=link}
Speravir 01:11, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
_logo_(2).svg){kind=link}
_logo_(2).svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image is not "official". User is uploading images they've poorly cut and made into unofficial .svg logos. Livelikemusic (talk) 02:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
_logo_(2).svg){kind=link}
Delete along with File:Murphy Brown (Warner Bros. sitcom) logo.svg; these appear to be poorly traced PNGs. Too low quality to be of proper educational use. I've uploaded File:Murphy Brown 2018 crop.png to serve as an alternative, and have updated the Wikidata item with it. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 20:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
_logo.svg){kind=link}
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Daniel.9 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Extracted from website with portions unreadable due to white text Yann (talk) 06:07, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Okładka jest ocenzurowana, co sprawia wrażenie, że postać mogłaby "hajlować". W rzeczywistości na okładce widać kobietę która miesza jakąś bardzo dużą łyżką. AkaruiHikari (talk) 06:12, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Keep The listed source -- https://polona.pl/item/65062800/4/ -- has an unpixellated version of the cover. It would be better to repair the in-use file than to delete. —Tcr25 (talk) 17:19, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see any need to change anything.
- The original version is available from CBN Polona under the Public Domain license: " Copyright: Public Domain. You may copy, change, distribute, and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, without having to ask for permission. " .
- If the original version is in the public domain, then its derivative (made by me) is also in the public domain, and my potential contribution is available under the CC-3.0 or cc-4.0 license.
- The excessive accusation of copyright infringement is therefore unfounded. Wieralee (talk) 15:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by HeminKurdistan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: logo PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 06:19, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jmcgnh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Work created in 1999 or later, so cannot be in public domain for first publication before 1929. Could possibly be PD-TEXTLOGO PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 06:20, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Geraldo Perez as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: as stated in the description Viggo Mortensen is the copyright holder, not the uploader as claimed Simple text? Yann (talk) 06:25, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Russia, artist Сергей Александрович Щербаков is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 08:54, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- К счастью, жив. А на что это влияет в данном случае? Не поняла характер претензии. Rita Malich (talk) 09:22, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Самая первая ссылка про "Свободу панорамы" (Commons:FOP) подробно описывает эту проблему. Если вкратце, то ваша фотография является "производной работой" от работы этого скульптора, и вам надо спрашивать у него разререшения, чтобы использовать её как-то ещё, кроме как для информационно-справочных материалов. Такое ограничение не подходит для Викисклада. Olksolo (talk) 19:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
The statue "Monumento alla lotta contadina (Giuseppe Novello)" is recent, dating 1991-05-12, and there is no FoP in Italy. It might be a work for hire for the city council of Montescaglioso, then it would be PD 20 years after creation. Ruthven (msg) 09:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Too soft by far, plenty of other pix of the same building Sardaka (talk) 10:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Logos are free use and not licensed correctly for Commons SerChevalerie (talk) 11:19, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- If so, why did you nominate this for deletion? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Nicht konform i.S. von: Commons:Deletion_policy/de#Nicht nützlich für Bildungszwecke, hat eher werblichen Charakter von mäßiger bis schlechter Qualität; das Logo verstößt u.U. sogar gegen das Urheberrecht H7 (talk) 11:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ich habe damals den Wikipedia-Artikel "Heumilch" geschrieben, weil mir auf einer Käsepackung aus dem Aldi dieser Begriff zu ersten Mal untergekommen ist und dazu auf Wikipedia noch nichts zu finden war. Also habe ich die erste Version dieses Artikels geschrieben und zur Veranschaulichung dieses Foto vom Siegel mit dem Text "aus Heumilch" auf der Käsepackung beigefügt. Es dokumentiert schlicht den Stand aus 2010, nix Werbung und Urheberrecht. 79.241.36.133 11:57, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Below COM:TOO, in scope as a good fit for Category:Organic certification labels TheImaCow (talk) 12:24, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per above. "Educational character" is to be interpreted very broadly as any image that is plausibly usable on any Wikimedia site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
The National Gallery of Art uploaded this image as part of its contribution to Wikimedia Commons in 2019. Since then, it has come to the Gallery's attention that this image, while out of copyright, has complex relationships with Native American tribal rights and traditions. The Gallery has taken this image down from its website as it works with Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPOs) to ensure that it respects Native American culture and agency. It asks, in the spirit of respecting indigenous traditions and belief, that this image be deleted until the Gallery has received approval and guidance from the THPOs on its reproduction. Brwz (talk) 16:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
The National Gallery of Art, the uploader of the image, requests a courtesy deletion of an image that it uploaded more than 30 days ago by mistake in light of new information that has come to our (the uploader’s) attention that weighs in favor of courtesy deletion. The image does not appear to be used to illustrate any Wikipedia article on the subject. Namely: (1) The image provider has since learned that the copyright term in the artwork depicted in the image likely has not yet expired and, therefore, the image likely still remains under copyright. Moreover, the image provider is not the copyright owner and lacks permission to authorize others to use the image. (2) The artwork depicted in the image is of cultural sensitivity to the officially recognized Native American tribe (Pueblo of Jemez), whose Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) has asked us to: (a) take down the image from all of our own platforms, which we have done, and (b) ask all platforms to whom we have provided the image to also please delete the image. In both cases, the deletion is requested on cultural heritage grounds, consistent with the Creative Commons guidelines that Wikimedia itself observes. Creative Commons has advised that tribal images, such as this one, should not be eligible for CC0 status. See, Towards Better Sharing of Cultural Heritage - An Agenda for Copyright Reform: A Creative Commons Policy Paper [2022-02-09], p. 20. (3) Since learning the above information, the image provider now believes it provided the image to Wikimedia by mistake. Moreover, it further appears that the image could be deleted without significant loss to the overall educational holdings of Wikimedia Commons. The image does not appear in any of the articles or of galleries for either the main Wikipedia article on Jemez Pueblo or the associated pages, including a page on the people and culture of Jemez Pueblo, even though those pages are rich with historical and cultural images and associated image galleries. In fact, one such gallery appears to contain an image of the same subject but “of greater equal or greater” overall educational value and that is currently in the public domain. Thank you. An Indexer (talk) 17:39, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- A public-domain image on the same subject of ‘equal or greater’ educational value is already in use on Wikipedia at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pueblo_Revolt#/media/File:Kachina_dolls.jpg. The image is used to illustrate Wikipedia’s article on the Pueblo Revolt of 1860: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pueblo_Revolt An Indexer (talk) 18:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I would tend to oppose a courtesy deletion of a useful image. However, copyright could be an issue. An Indexer, please explain why this image is not likely to be in the public domain. When did Patricio Toya die? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Patricio Toya died in 1993, and thus the copyright term would not yet be expired, meaning this image is not likely to be in the public domain. An Indexer (talk) 13:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed. So Delete at least for that reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed. So
- Patricio Toya died in 1993, and thus the copyright term would not yet be expired, meaning this image is not likely to be in the public domain. An Indexer (talk) 13:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- I would tend to oppose a courtesy deletion of a useful image. However, copyright could be an issue. An Indexer, please explain why this image is not likely to be in the public domain. When did Patricio Toya die? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
I have been notified that we would typically say "Arabic Wikipedia" or "the Arabic Wikipedia version", rather than "Wikipedia Arabic". So I uploaded a newer version with the correct form. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Enhancing_Online_Volunteer_Translation_(Wikimania_2024)_Abd_Alsattar_Ardati.pdf Abd Alsattar Ardati (talk) 19:46, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Muster3633 (talk · contribs)
editlooking like personal photos of non contributors, F10. could be 
Speedy delete if there is no respond.
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 19:48, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Used the photo in an article that I just submitted of the person. Muster3633 (talk) 23:52, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Obvious Keep. Your deletion request on Wikipedia was speedily declined. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:07, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Matthew_J._Sharps still, it is not approved. not notable. Delete modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 13:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC) 09:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's premature to delete it. Why are you in such a rush? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- there will be no harm if image got deleted. wikipedia looks into sources and notability, not images. if somehow that draft is approved we can return the image or upload same image in future. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 13:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC) 16:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's premature to delete it. Why are you in such a rush? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Matthew_J._Sharps still, it is not approved. not notable.
Adds nothing. Normally this audio clip should be used in a context that introduces it as "the pronunciation of fête in a Quebecois accent" or something like that. — W.andrea (talk) 20:18, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- And you could add that text to the file page. Doesn't seem like a good deletion reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
This photo was taken someday after 2005, when DK3G was retired from Batong Line, not in 1971 as described, so it's not in public domain yet. Gcycaas (talk) 21:25, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Geof Sheppard as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The date is obviously wrong but this postcard could not have been published before 1948 as it depicts a British Railways locomotive. It is therefore not in the public domain in either UK (70 years from publication) or USA (95 years if not published in USA). Note that Mark Crombie is the original uploader of the copy, not the author of the original work. Yann (talk) 21:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Geohakkeri as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: more or less similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arthur Hitchins.jpg Yann (talk) 21:31, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Geohakkeri as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: more or less similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arthur Hitchins.jpg Yann (talk) 21:31, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
advart. own work? maybe make for hire. not provide permit. similr https://web.archive.org/web/20210411214043/https://www.ksjg.com/kenji/facility . eien20 (talk) 22:04, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
This image is outdated, a new image is proposed to be replaced with a higher quality version. SusanRichards85 (talk) 23:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
