[#59462] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9342][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#clear does not notify waiting threads in Ruby 1.9.3 — "jsc (Justin Collins)" <redmine@...>

9 messages 2014/01/02

[#59466] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9343][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#max= wakes up waiters properly — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

11 messages 2014/01/02

[#59498] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9352][Open] [BUG] rb_sys_fail_str(connect(2) for [fe80::1%lo0]:3000) - errno == 0 — "kain (Claudio Poli)" <claudio@...>

10 messages 2014/01/03

[#59516] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9356][Open] TCPSocket.new does not seem to handle INTR — "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charliesome@...>

48 messages 2014/01/03

[#59538] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>

33 messages 2014/01/03
[#59582] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2014/01/06

Intersting challenge.

[#59541] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2014/01/04

Hi, I noticed a trivial typo in array.c, and it fails building struct.c

[#59583] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9367][Open] REXML::XmlDecl doesn't use user specified quotes — "bearmini (Takashi Oguma)" <bear.mini@...>

12 messages 2014/01/06

[#59642] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9384][Open] Segfault in ruby 2.1.0p0 — "cbliard (Christophe Bliard)" <christophe.bliard@...>

11 messages 2014/01/08

[#59791] About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

A while ago I created a proof-of-concept that I intended to use in my

16 messages 2014/01/15
[#59794] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2014/01/15

On 15 Jan 2014, at 11:58, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com> wrote:

[#59808] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2014/01/16

Em 15-01-2014 19:42, Eric Hodel escreveu:

[#59810] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2014/01/16

On 16 Jan 2014, at 02:15, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com> wrote:

[#59826] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2014/01/17

Em 16-01-2014 19:43, Eric Hodel escreveu:

[#59832] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2014/01/17

On 17 Jan 2014, at 04:22, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com> wrote:

[ruby-core:60065] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9439] Remove OpenSSL from stdlib

From: mame@...
Date: 2014-01-24 19:13:57 UTC
List: ruby-core #60065
Issue #9439 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.


Shyouhei Urabe wrote:
> OpenSSL seemd easy to support at first.  We were only needed to
> wrap the C library with Ruby and that's it.  Now, things gets more
> complicated.  People requests us to keep being MORE SECURE THAN
> the OpenSSL itself.  That costs us very much.  I studied this topic
> these days very much and still have no idea how to actually absuse
> CRIME to get any uncrypted data.  It's as clear as sky that I cannot
> be more secure than the default without actually understand
> its backgrounds; I lack knowledge, or experience, or maybe both.


Fully agreed.  That said, I'm not positive for the proposal as long as Martin Bosslet is willing to maintain the library.


Off-topic: A bigger problem is "kind" people.  In an extreme case, we can ignore those who just require something.  But it is far more difficult to ignore those who kindly say "I can help you."  In fact, they are sometimes much more harmful; they let us take a hard road, saying "don't worry, I'll help you!", and then they disappear.

This time, there are some persons who said so.  But I don't see their action after the actual patch appears.  Did they read it?  Did they verify it?  Do they have no opinion?  I don't know.  They must become busy suddenly.  If they would not return, I'd have to say they tried to bullshit us in an innocent way.

Thus, I do not trust such "kind" words.  True contributors do never say "I can contribute!", but do contribute first.

-- 
Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>

----------------------------------------
Feature #9439: Remove OpenSSL from stdlib
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9439#change-44574

* Author: Zachary Scott
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* Category: lib
* Target version: current: 2.2.0
----------------------------------------
Regarding [ruby-core:59943], I agree with nobu that we should remove OpenSSL from ruby.

It's become too hard to maintain, and would better serve our users to encourage the use of a different implementation.

Another benefit of removing OpenSSL is the impact backport fixes have on the release management team.

Although I haven't yet determined the extent of work required to remove it (ie: tooling, tests, etc). We can discuss them here.



-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread

Prev Next